Comments on: WALKER STAYS WITH THE RAIDERS

By: iriedonky

iriedonky — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:58:58 +0000

Really? A champagne spraying referance? Am I the only one that finds that in-appropriate? To so blithely refer to an incident that most likely led to the death of Darrent Williams (R.I.P.) is beneath Florio, and the PFT website. I am a long time fan, and daily viewer and I’ve never had occasion to make a comment like this. Come on Florio, save that finite supply of wit for something that is actually laughable.

By: anaheim2dafullest

anaheim2dafullest — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:45:51 +0000

what happened to this guy, ever since he left green bay hes been wack, n e ways i think raiders go after harrison i mean he did shoot someone and i mean thats the type of players raiders want, T.O. maybe but i thought they said they didnt want him, maybe they are getting ready to trade for vick lol another raider type of player.

By: myusernamestinks

myusernamestinks — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:24:33 +0000

Keeping Walker at a reduced rate is a reasonable decision for both sides. Oakland has some decent young prospects at WR, but it’s good to have a veteran in the mix, even if it’s a douchebag veteran. Hell, he might even care about his image enough to go out and try to prove he’s not the overrated assbag everyone says he is.

By: GB3Pack4

GB3Pack4 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:10:50 +0000

How the mighty are fallen.

By: empty13

empty13 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:09:10 +0000

nope. it is for she-ho.

By: raider_md

raider_md — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:16:09 +0000

TO sees none of this money, it will be used to shore up the OL and a DT/DE would be nice too.

By: RonO

RonO — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:10:28 +0000

Can’t be right. St Florio made it official he was cut.

By: RaiderAnt

RaiderAnt — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:04:02 +0000

This was the Best case scenario for the Raiders considering the situation. At least now there’s some cap space and Walker may be able to contribute rather than lose all that cap space for nothing. It’s been a good offseason so far for the Raiders. Hopefully it’s not ruined with a T.O. signing. Which contrary to all you parrots, I don’t believe will happen.

By: nedirect

nedirect — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:54:42 +0000

they need somebody to play opposite TO.

By: akkent

akkent — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:39:05 +0000

What, a player’s contract w/ reasonable numbers in the later years?! He clearly signed the contract w/ enormous salaries in later years that were unlikely to be reached because the team will have to cut him to save costs. Why do players sign those kinds of deals? Is it just that agents want to have those 4+ year deals even if they know the probability of getting to the last years intact is nearly nill?

By: TheDudesDad

TheDudesDad — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:22:27 +0000

There is the money they need to sign T.O. I am telling you that is where he is going to wind up and I know I run the risk of looking like an idiot if he doesn’t but I am sure it will happen.

By: INVAIDUH

INVAIDUH — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:13:05 +0000

Damn! Just let’m go.

By: empty13

empty13 — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:10:59 +0000

Raiders are going for she-ho. hello old timey afc west bidding war.
it wont matter. he is slipping. walker blows.
and russell is inexperienced/fragile so it will break down soon.
raiders better get a tough old bird backup qb.

By: cmondfrans

cmondfrans — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:10:29 +0000

Best possible outcome to the situation for the raiders.