Skip to content

Eagles, McNabb Agree To New Deal

Jay Glazer of FOXSports.com, who apparently has taken a break from watching Matt Leinart hump a heavy bag long enough to do some actual work, reports that the Eagles and quarterback Donovan McNabb have agreed to terms on a deal replacing the final two years of his current contract.
Per Glazer, McNabb gets a raise over the $19.2 million he already was due to earn, and guaranteed money for 2010.
The deal has not yet been extended.
Frankly, it makes no sense.  Why give McNabb more money with no new years in return for it, especially with so many guys making so much less signed to deals they’d love to re-do?
We think this one will cause more problems than it solves in the locker room.  As Brad Childress would say, “Stay tuned.”
UPDATE:  Derrick Gunn of Comcast SportsNet is reporting the move, too.

Permalink 25 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Contracts, Philadelphia Eagles, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
25 Responses to “Eagles, McNabb Agree To New Deal”
  1. sultanofslot says: Jun 11, 2009 10:25 PM

    “Why give McNabb more money with no new years in return for it, especially with so many guys making so much less signed to deals they’d love to re-do?”
    Because it keeps McNabb happy? And, besides Sheldon Brown, no one in the locker room is likely to be angry about it, since all that happened is that McNabb’s pay was raised to a level closer than that to the highest paid QBs in the NFL.
    We cut T.O. for a reason…

  2. desides says: Jun 11, 2009 10:31 PM

    “Frankly, it makes no sense. Why give McNabb more money with no new years in return for it, especially with so many guys making so much less signed to deals they’d love to re-do?”
    1. It keeps him happy.
    2. Kevin Kolb.

  3. 44-6-andthenRomofainted says: Jun 11, 2009 10:31 PM

    1. Manning
    2. Brady
    3. McNabb
    4. Brees
    5. Rivers
    6. Warner
    7. Cutler
    8. Palmer
    9. Ryan
    10. Rodgers
    11. E Manning
    12. Cassel
    19. Pat White
    20. Romo
    24. Rothlisberger
    31. Quinn
    32. Delhomme

  4. sdffa11 says: Jun 11, 2009 10:31 PM

    it makes no sense. why not extend him if you’re giving him a raise? get him cheap now because trying to sign him to a long term deal after his current contract expires will be harder since he’ll want more. the eagles will then lowball him citing age, wear and tear and itll be the beginning of the end.

  5. northcarolina5022 says: Jun 11, 2009 10:37 PM

    TOLD YA FLORIO

  6. RugDaniels says: Jun 11, 2009 10:37 PM

    regardless I’m sure #5 will find something to sulk about.

  7. gibsonplyer says: Jun 11, 2009 10:39 PM

    I’m fairly sure the last two years were voidable (possibly by McNabb) this likely changes that. So yeah he had leverage and plays a much more valuable position than the unspectacular Sheldon Brown. Brown a CB who’s never been to the pro bowl plays a position where they’re loaded at and have proven particularly adept at developing.
    No one else has said a word about their contract despite Sheldon’s attempts to pull them in. Shawn basically told him to shut up about that. He although by the end of the year may see a new deal since he’s projected to be playing RT at this point and the new position will give them a way to give him a new deal.

  8. ICDogg says: Jun 11, 2009 10:41 PM

    Frankly, keeping the QB happy is not a bad investment, and paying an extra bonus for what might be fictional extra years might not be a great idea.

  9. davidm1886 says: Jun 11, 2009 10:46 PM

    made sense to guarantee more money to mcnabb…….they probably want to wait and see what happens with the CBA before signing an extension

  10. DP PHILA says: Jun 11, 2009 10:57 PM

    The deal makes complete sense if you know any of the background. When the initial deal was agreed upon, the understanding between the team and McNabb was that he would never see the last 2 years of the deal b/c the contract would be redone. This was based on the assumption that the last 2 years of McNabb’s contract would eat up a large chuck of the Birds cap in 2009 and 2010. The assumption was logical at the time because it was based on then current assumptions of how much the salary cap would rise over the life of the contract. At this point however, the salary cap has risen higher than anticipated. Moreover, not only do the last 2 years of McNabb’s contract not significantly impact the cap, the problem is McNabb is being underpaid, relative to his status as a top tier QB in the league. I believe his pay this year and next would place him as #10 highest paid QB but I’m not sure if that included initial signing bonus.
    In the end, tonight’s deal is about both sides honoring the prior “understanding” reached during negotiations of the last contract. Other considerations include possible uncapped year next year and Kevin Kobb in the wings. This is why the Eagles are guaranteeing more money for the last 2 years of the deal rather than extending the deal. Extending the deal could create problems in the event of an uncapped year and would also upset Kevin Kobb b/c it means he’ll be riding the pine that much longer.
    Sorry Florio, all of this is Eagles 101 to regular Philly fans. Ask your buddy Eskin (aka. Burger King).

  11. antneejay2 says: Jun 11, 2009 11:15 PM

    @ DP PHILA
    Very well put.Geez, ya gotta explain everything to those lawyers.

  12. packerswin says: Jun 11, 2009 11:19 PM

    44-6-andthenRomofainted, what kind of drugs are you on?
    1. Brady
    2. Brees
    3. Manning
    4. Rivers (he’s a bitch tho)
    5. McNabb
    6. Palmer
    7. Rodgers
    8. Warner
    9. E. Manning
    10. Cutler

  13. roughingtheholder says: Jun 11, 2009 11:54 PM

    Rothlisberger is 32nd. He is a sack/turnover machine

  14. kosarsmyidol says: Jun 12, 2009 12:15 AM

    roughingtheholder says:
    June 11th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
    “Rothlisberger is 32nd. He is a sack/turnover machine”
    I like Big Benn, and it kills me to admit that. I’d rank him pretty high. I still hope he eats it at least twice a year though,

  15. ozinsd says: Jun 12, 2009 12:23 AM

    @DP PHILA YES YES YES…..i now see the light. it’s no longer howard eskin…it’s B.K. Eskin….hahaha. maybe we should say separated at birth?

  16. dlcreed says: Jun 12, 2009 12:40 AM

    florio , you’d have been the punching bag if it had gotten you exposure. glazier punks you

  17. sultanofslot says: Jun 12, 2009 1:20 AM

    Brady is NOT #1. One of the most overrated players in NFL history.

  18. Vox Veritas says: Jun 12, 2009 1:41 AM

    This is the same guy that got benched last season, right?

  19. roughingtheholder says: Jun 12, 2009 8:36 AM

    Its also the same guy who beat the Cowboys 44-3 before they kicked a field goal, Romo fainted, fired their coaches, cut T0, and collapsed their building.

  20. Amused 2 Death says: Jun 12, 2009 8:42 AM

    Yeah the guy that took a 5-5-1 team to the NFC Championship. After earning the right to play in the postseason by defeating Dallas 44-6 the last game of the year. Yeah, that’s the guy!

  21. Vox Veritas says: Jun 12, 2009 10:41 AM

    “Its also the same guy who beat the Cowboys 44-3″
    That’s worth 5+ million?
    “Yeah the guy that took a 5-5-1 team to the NFC Championship.”
    Oh, so he’s getting paid for what he did in the past. Gotcha.

  22. mdel1120 says: Jun 12, 2009 10:58 AM

    Hey Vox, tell me what Romo has done to earn his 64 million dollar contract. Talk about a choker! The dude can’t even hold a football. He has not won ONE playoff game for the Cowboys. He likes to spend his time in Cabo instead of preparing for a big playoff game. Then, when they get beaten 44-6 by the Eagles, he says ” If losing a game is the worst thing to happen to me, I am good”. Yeah, that’s what you want to hear from a guy making 64million to WIN A FREAKING PLAYOFF GAME right after the biggest beatdown of the season by the McNabb and the EAGLES!!!!!! You my friend, are a loser.

  23. Hype says: Jun 12, 2009 1:32 PM

    Soooo if you want his rank take what the haters rank him at…then take where the homers rank him at..and hit the middle….looks about right

  24. unclaimedfright says: Jun 12, 2009 7:00 PM

    He’s certainly no Tony Romo! I mean, he wins playoff games.

  25. Alpheratz says: Jun 12, 2009 7:55 PM

    DP PHILA – I’m not sure that calm, reasoned, fact-based analysis has any place on these types of website posting areas.
    Please reevaluate your approach, and try again.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!