Skip to content

Could the Pack want T-Jack?

One of the reasons we like doing radio spots (apart from the fact that it’s free advertising) is that the conversation sometimes gives us ideas for topics about which to write.

And so it was that the just-completed segment with our old pal Paul Charchian (who’s filling in for Paul “I’ve Got 250 Paid Vacation Days, At Least I Think They’re Paid” Allen) on KFAN in Minneapolis resulted in a light-bulb flickering regarding the current situation involving Vikings quarterback Tarvaris Jackson.

Last night, Michael Lombardi of NFL Network said he’s hearing that Jackson will ask to be traded once the Vikes blow the horn for Brett Favre.  We said that we think Jackson should sit tight, in large part because it’s too late in the offseason for him to get ensconced with a new team.

One of the impediments would be the task of learning a new offense without the benefit of participating in the offseason program, during which much of the playbook is installed.  So Jackson’s best chance for getting up to speed based only on training camp and the preseason would come on a team that runs a similar if not identical offense.

And there happens to be one such team, in the same division as the Vikings.

The Green Bay Packers use essentially the same offense as the Vikes, which is one of the reasons why Brett Favre would (will) be such a good fit in Minnesota.  Also, the Packers have two unproven backups to Aaron Rodgers — Matt Flynn and Brian Brohm.

Thus, the Packers could end up being interested in Jackson.  And Jackson could end up being interested in the Packers.

This potential dynamic, however, is all the more reason for the Vikings to decline any trade request from Jackson.  His potential appeal to the Packers also gives the Vikings all the justification they need to refrain from cutting him, even if he fails to beat out Sage Rosenfels for the No. 2 spot on the depth chart.

Permalink 74 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Minnesota Vikings, Rumor Mill, Top Stories
74 Responses to “Could the Pack want T-Jack?”
  1. descendency says: Jul 14, 2009 11:57 AM

    Why not just wait for him to get cut after they get Favre?

  2. drgreenbaypackers says: Jul 14, 2009 11:59 AM

    wow. that is a real hypothetical ‘rumor’.

  3. eeerockski says: Jul 14, 2009 12:04 PM

    And then Rodgers gets hurt and we have the who wants to stick it to their old team more, game. That would be weird to watch.

  4. jimicos says: Jul 14, 2009 12:05 PM

    God I hope this never comes to pass. I know Flynn and Brohm aren’t exactly ready for prime-time.. But I don’t want Jackson.
    Oh, and charch is a chooch. For those of you who don’t know, he owns fanball.com.

  5. PurpleNGold says: Jul 14, 2009 12:06 PM

    football sure has changed
    oh the drama of it all
    this is too funny

  6. Bob S. says: Jul 14, 2009 12:09 PM

    No way Jose!

  7. MrHumble says: Jul 14, 2009 12:10 PM

    LOL…..it would be a bonus to have the Pack sign TJoke….then the Vikes defense could have some of that “ez pickin’s” that TJoke likes to serve up to opposing defenses plus the fact that he can’t hit the broad side of a barn with a pass….i say, “have at it pack”, use up a roster spot.

  8. zeakman says: Jul 14, 2009 12:11 PM

    That will show the Vikings who’s boss! We’ll give you T-Jack for an optional bus ride to Hudson on Sunday to get beer, fireworks, and cheese.

  9. Hungry N. Hadasnack says: Jul 14, 2009 12:12 PM

    Everyone knows T-Joke’s going to Houston in exchange for Grossman, who’s coming back to Minny to re-unite with B-3 (Benedict Bernard Berrian), in order to exact his revenge on the city, fans, and media of Chicago.
    Get ready to tremble, Chicago!
    No more Turnoverasaurus Rex!!
    (phonetically = Turn over-ass-sore-us)
    Now…tremble before the mighty Septemberasaurus Rex!! He’s FEROCIOUS during Sepember!!

  10. Bob Nelson says: Jul 14, 2009 12:13 PM

    Your just trying too hard for comments with such a laughable idea.
    The Packers haven’t had to prove their backups yet. That Jackson is a proven inept failure as a QB.
    The T-crap sucks and everyone knows he sucks.
    Only the viklings were stupid enough to draft such a terrible “player”. Still more stupid was wasting multiple draft picks on such a loser.
    That idiot no talent Jackson has no appeal to anyone in the NFL or CFL.
    Ted Thompson one of the best GM’s in the NFL will never be so stupid.
    Tarvaris Jackson is just another vikling bust of a draft pick. Just like Troy Williamson, Erasmus James, Dimitrious Underwood, and all those long forgotten D-linemen who were quickly out of the league.

  11. PKRBKR1 says: Jul 14, 2009 12:15 PM

    i can’t believe i just wasted time reading this non-sense. Quit smokin Flo!

  12. mikeb30 says: Jul 14, 2009 12:17 PM

    That would be great for the Packers! Then they could have 3 unproven backups!

  13. JakeScott says: Jul 14, 2009 12:22 PM

    This one is pretty far fetched. But on the topic of Favre/Jackson/Vikes QB Situation:
    1. The real problem with the Vikes passing game is Childress’ lame offense and its absurdly conservative and predictable approach, which appears to be due to Childress’ complete lack of imagination, innovation and creativity.
    2. Jackson was looking pretty decent at the end of the season last year. I think he is better than most people give him credit for but at the end of the day (based on the limited number of times I have heard him speak and/or seen him directly quoted) does not appear to be intelligent enough to ever be anything beyond “pretty decent.”
    3. The best thing Favre would bring to the Vikings is that he is likely to completely ignore Childress’ play calling when necessary. This might (stress: might) create a passing game that will otherwise never exist under Childress.
    4. Childress is not a very good head coach.

  14. Buschman says: Jul 14, 2009 12:24 PM

    “…And Jackson could end up being interested in the Packers.”
    Really??? I thought Tavaris wanted out because he’d be losing his starting job and wants to remain a starter. How could backing up Aaron Rodgers be a better situation. He just signed a long term deal. I’m sure Favre will be done long before Rodgers.

  15. dobolina says: Jul 14, 2009 12:29 PM

    Not gonna happen.
    If TT was willing to stick with 2 rookies as backups last season, 2 players that have now been in the Packer’s system for a year, why would he dump one of them for TJack?
    His upside isn’t any better than Flynn’s or Brohm’s. He actually has more downside.
    BTW, Charch no longer owns Fanball.

  16. CanadianVikingFan says: Jul 14, 2009 12:30 PM

    Florio please steer clear of drugs. Just say no!

  17. empty13 says: Jul 14, 2009 12:30 PM

    the pack would milk him for playbook details then discard him like a used condom, just after minnehaha discarded him like a used condom.
    lets all get real. t-jack sucks. 3rd string qb and 2nd string wildcat qb. period.

  18. bigfog says: Jul 14, 2009 12:34 PM

    So, let me get this straight. You get picked up by a legit news group, and you repay them by making up some ridiculous rumor out of thin air and running it as the top story on your site? Really? This is the kind of crap armchair quarterbacks come up with! What next, “Giants Willing to Trade Manning for Romo?” See, I just made up a “rumor” too, maybe I can get NBC to give me a paycheck!
    Oh, and Green Bay does N.O.T. run the same offense as the Vikings, regardless of what Brent Favre would have you believe.

  19. whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: Jul 14, 2009 12:40 PM

    Doesn’t Charchanian realize that the flow of players disgarded to the scrap heap only flows from GB to MN, not the other way around?

  20. aaron wilson HATES comments says: Jul 14, 2009 12:40 PM

    T-Jack will be this years Chad Pennington if (when) Favre rolls into town… you watch

  21. davidhare says: Jul 14, 2009 12:40 PM

    Childress went 6-10, 8-8 and 10-6 in his first three seasons. He must be doing something right. While I don’t want Favre here for reasons any Vikings fan can under stand, he is still better than enything we have.

  22. Bob_Zombie, JimmySmits, and Cojones says: Jul 14, 2009 12:40 PM

    The Pack hasn’t had a non-white (see: black) QB since Aaron Brooks (who?).
    There’d be riots in the streets of that little meat-packing town if the Vikings got anything more than a pack of Johnsonville brats and a case of Leinie’s for T-Jack.
    And Bob…you don’t call Tony Mandarich a draft bust? Or most of your mid-round O-Line selections for the past ten years or so that aren’t with the team (or any team, for that matter) anymore? GTFO.

  23. J.Cannon says: Jul 14, 2009 12:41 PM

    Good to see fucthm N. Lickdhsac and Bob Nelson have allready chimed in on this post. The true Biqueens at it again. You two are worse than Bruno.

  24. ZN0rseman says: Jul 14, 2009 12:46 PM

    If the Vikings trade T-Joke it will be to the Eagles or to the Texans. There is no way in hell they would ever make such a trade to the Packers. Not because the Vikings have any fear of Tavaris Jackson, quite the contrary, but because Jackson knows their playbook back to front.
    Also, you guys should know better. The Pack already has 3 solid QB’s in Aaron Rogers, Brian Brohm and Matt Flynn.
    The Eagles however, could use Tavaris as a way to quell the racial upset that would be caused by benching or cutting McNabb in favor of Kevin Kolb… something the Eagles should have done a year ago.
    $0.02,
    –Z

  25. DonkeyRider says: Jul 14, 2009 12:50 PM

    There is no better way to give a boost to you unproven back up QB situation then trading for a proven back up. Tarvaris is proven, proven crap.
    His career stats (25 games):
    PASSING:
    58.4% completion percentage
    3,442 yards
    20 TDs
    18 INTs
    41 Sacks
    RUSHING:
    95 attempts
    482 yards
    4 touchdowns
    14 fumbles
    Why would the Packers would trade for a guy who averages less than 160 yards a game as well as having 32 combined fumbles and interceptions vs. 24 touchdowns? Clearly his grasp of the offense is not to keen.

  26. jharmon64 says: Jul 14, 2009 12:52 PM

    If you ARE going to try to make a serious article, at least you could list what his contract is worth. I doubt the Pack or anybody else is interested. Of course that’s if this was a serious or even remote possibility……which it is not.

  27. MrHumble says: Jul 14, 2009 12:52 PM

    Hey Bob Nelson…….as if the Pack hasn’t had their share of draft busts……….including one of the top 5 NFL busts of all time, one Tony Mandarich, lol

  28. Skol says: Jul 14, 2009 12:59 PM

    Why would they have to get T-Joke to get the Vikings playbook? How hard is it to figure out, Run Left, Run Left, Short dump pass to the FB on third and long, Punt? Childress’ IHOP menu playbook isn’t rocket science by any means.

  29. gopackers67 says: Jul 14, 2009 1:00 PM

    I don’t think it’s a good fit, our playbook is longer than 7 pages (single-sided)…

  30. DCViking says: Jul 14, 2009 1:02 PM

    If there is any truth to this story, I hope the Vikings file tampering charges against the Packers…it doesn’t seem to matter if they are true or not…

  31. jeremiah says: Jul 14, 2009 1:04 PM

    i am not even sure how to respond to such a rediculous article.
    and why does everyone say the vikes and the packers run identicle offesnses????
    in case you hadn’t noticed the vikes run a “run run run run throw 3 yards on a 3rd and 8″ type offense.
    the packers run a “run throw throw throw” offense.
    just think how bad travalerious would be/have been if he didn’t have adrian peterson to hand off to, and had to throw the ball 40 times a game instead.
    no news=no substance=no rumor=florio passing time

  32. DCViking says: Jul 14, 2009 1:08 PM

    # whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: July 14, 2009 12:40 PM
    Doesn’t Charchanian realize that the flow of players disgarded to the scrap heap only flows from GB to MN, not the other way around?
    ———————————————
    Best Example: Koren Robinson —- oops.

  33. J.Cannon says: Jul 14, 2009 1:22 PM

    ZNorseman you cant be serious? Why would the Eagles cut McNabb when he is one of the best Qb’s in the league? They tried benching McNabb for Kolb last year in a game vs. the Ravens and he proved that he wasn’t ready to be a starter in the league. Plus the Eagles just gave McNabb a new contract that will keep him there as the starter for the next two years. Would you rather have Kolb or McNabb as the Vikings starter? (hypothetically of course) Now think before you answer because you could potentially sound dumber than you already have.

  34. MrHumble says: Jul 14, 2009 1:26 PM

    hey bigfog…….you may believe in ur Pack but please……understand football before you make certain comments. The vikes and pack DO run the same west coast offense and have for many years. they and about 8 other nfl teams run the exact same style of w.c. offense, you need to look beyond the cheese colored glasses. but you may know more about their styles than all the nfl coaches, coordinators etc. and besides what the hell does lord farve know compared to you.

  35. jeremiah says: Jul 14, 2009 1:31 PM

    a pack of johnsonvilles and a case of leinies?
    no, sorry. try a half eaten johnsonville and 3 empties from the case of leinies! and it would be that summer shandy crap, not any of the better stuff.

  36. jrmbadger says: Jul 14, 2009 1:37 PM

    Not gonna happen.
    My understanding from the Favre saga is that Chilly’s offense is a “day one install” – meaning its very simple.
    My speculation: The offense has been dumbed down for T-Jack.
    I can guarantee that Green Bay’s offense is not so simple. That’s why Flynn and Brohm are having a hard time. That’s why it took A-Rodg so long to come up to speed.
    Not only that, but I cannot imagine the Pack would carry 4 quarterbacks on the roster, and I don’t think GB is ready to give up on Flynn or Brohm yet.

  37. JimmySmith says: Jul 14, 2009 1:38 PM

    It is an insult to even sugget the Packers are that stupid. If they wanted a proven backup, they can scour the waiver wires after the first game and probably pick up the likes of a Bob Griese or similar experienced QB. T Jack Off has no upside potential and he is as dumb as a bag of rocks. I often thought that Klink drafted the idiot so he would always have someone dumber than he was in the locker room, that is if you don’t count the janitor and he’s likely to have an IQ higher than Klink and T Jack Off combined.
    My prediction, T Jack Off gets cut before the first game and never sees the NFL again. UFL maybe, flipping hamburgers at Burger King is likely, but he was never an NFL QB to begin with and only a dumb ass would think otherwise…..as in head coach Col Klink.

  38. Jared Allen's Mullet says: Jul 14, 2009 1:42 PM

    And then when Favre goes down because he’s just too damn long in the tooth (not if, WHEN) T-Jack will regret his decision because Aaron Rodgers isn’t going anywhere. Then again, maybe he just wants to be paid to stand on the sidelines. I guess being a backup behind a capable QB isn’t a bad gig if you can get it!

  39. straw33 says: Jul 14, 2009 1:42 PM

    Ridiculous.
    TJack might be a decent QB in this league if he’s willing to sit behind a vet and learn for another year or two, while sharpening his fundamentals.
    Philly would be the best fit, 2 or 3 years left for the primary starter, a great vet to learn from, and a very similar offense (much more than the Packers). This would give him his chance to start down the road (won’t have that with the Pack) and give him a chance to earn a roster spot (won’t have that with the Pack – since Brohm is the #3 QB right now, the Pack aren’t going to cut bait on a 2nd round pick after 1 year).
    Vikes are pretty dumb, but not that dumb, though we probably already have the full playbook from Sharper (once a Packer always a Packer).
    Florio – now that you work for NBC, you need to quit eating shrooms on weekdays.

  40. whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: Jul 14, 2009 1:56 PM

    # DCViking says: July 14, 2009 1:08 PM
    # whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: July 14, 2009 12:40 PM
    Doesn’t Charchanian realize that the flow of players disgarded to the scrap heap only flows from GB to MN, not the other way around?
    ———————————————
    Best Example: Koren Robinson —- oops.
    ————–
    Except the difference was that Thompson drafted him in Seattle, so he was his guy long before he ever played for the Vikings.

  41. The Family Ghost says: Jul 14, 2009 2:11 PM

    R E A C H ! ! ! !

  42. DCViking says: Jul 14, 2009 2:13 PM

    # whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: July 14, 2009 1:56 PM
    # DCViking says: July 14, 2009 1:08 PM
    # whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: July 14, 2009 12:40 PM
    Doesn’t Charchanian realize that the flow of players disgarded to the scrap heap only flows from GB to MN, not the other way around?
    ———————————————
    Best Example: Koren Robinson —- oops.
    ————–
    Except the difference was that Thompson drafted him in Seattle, so he was his guy long before he ever played for the Vikings.
    ————————————–
    Oh, I guess that makes it OK to ignore the fact that the Packers picked up him up after the Vikings cut him.
    Thanks for clarifying that!

  43. pkrlvr says: Jul 14, 2009 2:20 PM

    Funniest thing I’ve read on this site in ages. That statement makes everything else you say absolutely worthless.
    Still, the fact that you called Jackson crap, terrible, worthless, a bust, inept, an idiot and a loser all in one post says a lot more about you than it does about him.
    You’re just like 90% of the guys posting here who have no idea that you can use the internet for reasons other than bashing people anonymously.

  44. pkrjones says: Jul 14, 2009 2:21 PM

    I was hoping this article was about the Packers interest in:
    Tyson Jackson (DE)
    Tanard Jackson (FS) as QB
    Either would be a better option as a backup QB than Tavaris, and they could also play some D for the Packers!

  45. pkrlvr says: Jul 14, 2009 2:24 PM

    Jareds Mullet, Favre hasn’t gone down in 17 seasons. Messed up ankle, broken thumb, bad shoulder, bad bicep, etc. Still hasn’t missed a snap. So when he goes down, you can talk, until then, maybe you should quit prognosticating.

  46. whatthehellisgoingonoutthere says: Jul 14, 2009 2:31 PM

    @DCViking,
    If you want to get technical about everything, as a Viking fan with no logic, it won’t end well. You’re almost as dumb as most of the other Viking idiots spouting off, who run away and ignore facts and stats once they are brought to their attention.
    Yes, while they cut him and he signed with the Packers it’s still a bit different given that he drafted him. Thompson believed he was a good guy with a problem and gave him a 2nd chance. The Vikings cut him because he because they OVERPAID him as a #1 WR after he made the pro bowl as a kick returner (made a lot of sense) and got into trouble, not because he couldn’t make the team. Hell, he was given the #1 WR job. Shows how desperate the Vikings were and still are. The Packers GM who drafted him wanted to give him a 2nd chance after he got help for himself and signed him to a minimum wage deal as their #5 WR.

  47. zygi milf says: Jul 14, 2009 2:37 PM

    @ DC Viking -
    You seem to forget that logic does not apply to Viking-bashing Packer fans like “whatthehelliscrawlinginmyass”.

  48. PossibleCabbage says: Jul 14, 2009 2:46 PM

    Really, considering that Packers coach Mike McCarthy basically made a name for himself for nurturing young QBs (he was responsible for Aaron Brooks’s best season in New Orleans, for example), this isn’t totally crazy.
    The question would be “suppose the Vikings cut Jackson”, who do the Packers cut to make room for him if interested. Brohm is a big name with a lot of potential but hasn’t realized it yet, and Flynn won the backup job fair and square. Do you give up on Brohm this early, or do you cut your #2 guy for some reason.
    Just don’t see it happening.

  49. JakeScott says: Jul 14, 2009 2:55 PM

    davidhare @ 12:40 — Recall that Childress inherited a 9-7 team, THEN went 6-10, 8-8 and 10-6 in his first 3 seasons. So that doesn’t strike me as any terrific accomplishment. The Defense is definitely better but Tomlin and Frazier get the credit for that. Childress has likely had very little to do with the Defensive improvements as he is (or, more accurately, is supposed to be) an Offense guy. The Offense the Vikes run is absurdly remedial and way, way underproductive. Without Adrian Peterson (who miraculously fell into the Vikes’ lap on draft day), the Vikes would have zero hope of being competitive with Childress’ Offense. As I stated above, the biggest potential benefit of bringing Favre in is that he is likely to periodically completely ignore Childress’ play calling, which MIGHT result in some semblance of an NFL caliber passing game. As long as Childress is head coach, that’s about the best Vikes fans can hope for.

  50. jimicos says: Jul 14, 2009 3:01 PM

    Bob_Zombie, JimmySmits, and Cojones says:
    July 14, 2009 12:40 PM
    The Pack hasn’t had a non-white (see: black) QB since Aaron Brooks (who?).
    There’d be riots in the streets of that little meat-packing town if the Vikings got anything more than a pack of Johnsonville brats and a case of Leinie’s for T-Jack.
    ————————————
    Henry Burris. 2002, I think. Never played a snap, and I don’t think he made the final roster. But he was there for at least some of training camp. And after he was let go and signed by the Bears there was talk that he’d be able to steal the Packers’ offensive signals on the sidelines.
    Get yourself a real username and at least a minimum of credibility and then come back.

  51. jimicos says: Jul 14, 2009 3:03 PM

    MrHumble says:
    July 14, 2009 12:52 PM
    Hey Bob Nelson…….as if the Pack hasn’t had their share of draft busts……….including one of the top 5 NFL busts of all time, one Tony Mandarich, lol
    ———————————–
    I wouldn’t include Mandarich as a top 5 NFL bust because he actually became a serviceable NFL player, albeit with a different team.
    But if you want to talk about top 5 overhyped players… He’s on the table.

  52. imaginesuperbowlwin says: Jul 14, 2009 3:04 PM

    BOB NELSON shut up loser, how did Mossy Cade work out for you guys?

  53. purpleguy says: Jul 14, 2009 3:15 PM

    That scenario would just be too classic. For once, I agree with most of the cheeser posts, except that Bob Nelson guy who views the world through his clueless green and gold glasses as usual. It will be interesting to watch the Pack collapse even quicker than usual if Rogers goes down. Why the hell does that genius TT even take the chance? Oh yeah, I forgot, he’s sticking with his play mediocre draft picks plan.

  54. TheBaySay says: Jul 14, 2009 3:35 PM

    No, I don’t think the Packers want Jackson. However, if he is angered about losing his number to old Whatisname, it would be cool for GB to get John David Booty from Mini. Just want to hear it once, late in the fourth quarter of some game… McCarthy has taken his headset off – he’s looking down the bench – I think – YES! He’s made the Booty call!!

  55. DCViking says: Jul 14, 2009 3:47 PM

    @whatthehellisgoingonoutthere:
    You indicated Packers never signed ex-Vikings (presumably because they are tainted) and now you cry like a baby with colic because I pointed out an exception to your post.
    If you need to caveat your post, or go back on what you originally stated in your post — it’s OK, everyone makes mistakes.
    Don’t wet your pants and ask momma for some extra cuddles tonight to make the bad man go away.

  56. falstaff1962 says: Jul 14, 2009 4:11 PM

    So who comes out ahead when one team signs a has-been and the other team signs a never-was?

  57. DCViking says: Jul 14, 2009 4:14 PM

    @TheBaySay -
    Don’t think about grabbing our Booty!

  58. JaredAllen69 says: Jul 14, 2009 4:22 PM

    I have to hand it to you Florio, you know how to start the Minnesota vs. GB flame wars. The Jackson story is pretty funny, and far fetched. Funny to see how many people took the flame bait. Surprisingly, I was not one of those people. For once. LOL.

  59. longrodvanhungendong says: Jul 14, 2009 4:27 PM

    Ok Florio, it sounds like NBC has given you a quota for how many articles you must publish a day. I know its slow right now but all these “what if” articles are worse than reading nothing……….Its like kids starting rumors in the gym locker room.

  60. lebowski says: Jul 14, 2009 4:36 PM

    DCViking is a douchebag.

  61. jimicos says: Jul 14, 2009 4:39 PM

    falstaff1962 says:
    July 14, 2009 4:11 PM
    So who comes out ahead when one team signs a has-been and the other team signs a never-was?
    ————————————
    The team that pays less.

  62. Hungry N. Hadasnack says: Jul 14, 2009 5:31 PM

    J.Cannon says:
    July 14, 2009 12:41 PM
    Good to see fucthm N. Lickdhsac and Bob Nelson have allready chimed in on this post. The true Biqueens at it again. You two are worse than Bruno.
    __________________________________
    Jake-Anne-un,
    You flirtin’ with me again, JJ?
    Speaking of sack-licking, this is TWICE now you’ve tried to get my attention/given me your best baby-bird impersonation…
    Well keep that beak open, ’cause I’ve got dinner for ya…
    First, I’m sorry to disappoint you (though, I suspect this MUST be somthing you’ve become accustomed to), but I’m just not into purple-helmet-loving, horn blowing, or living in a place where Stuart Smalley’s insecure influence is as ubiquitous as his reign of gaydom is absolute.
    Secondly, nor am I into teams whose losing tradition is outdone only by their inability to sell out a home playoff game, which is outdone only by the ineptitiude of the head coach, which is rivalled only by the sad and scandalous history of a franchise that EPITOMIZES disappointment, while whoring out whatever remaining fragment of dignity it MAY have had left to a washed up egomaniacal (enemy) re-tread, and all for the sake of selling a few tickets & jerseys.
    Nope, not into any of those things one bit.
    But you go on and call ME the “biqueen”, if it makes you feel better
    (I get it now! Using that hateful word over and over again against OTHER people will “take the sting out of it” when it’s used against you, right?)
    Finally–Sorry, I don’t know any “Bruno”.
    But admittedly, I don’t run around here like a desperate little giggly fanboy, wrists all aflutter, who keeps track of what all the boys are posting and where and when and what they might be wearing today…
    But you keep on keepin’ on, if that’s “how you roll”…but next time (regardless of the severity of your intellectual disabilities), I just might not be so NICE.
    Now you be careful blowin’ those horns, mmmkay?

  63. jimicos says: Jul 14, 2009 5:55 PM

    Nice hamster, NBC.

  64. WickedMessenger says: Jul 14, 2009 6:34 PM

    Mike,
    That sounds great and all except one problem. The Packers don’t run the same offense as the Vikings. The vikings offensive coo is Darrell Beavell, he worked under Mike Sherman. I guess you could classify them as being similar both being west coast based. However, from what I understand their pretty different. What Sherman and beavell ran in Green Bay could only loosely be classified as west coast. Mcmarthy on the other hand runs some much more similar to Holmgren.

  65. jxhnne says: Jul 14, 2009 8:32 PM

    I’ve had it! Why is every viqueen fan so blind. You morons sit and drink this kool-aid every offseason that your beloved boys in purple are only one piece away from a championship. Really? Farve is your answer? The only reason this whiny baby is even able to sucker the super intelligent chilly into getting him more money is
    1. In 2007 Brent had the best recieving corps he ever had. (Yes I remember sharpe)
    2. His best offensive line was also in 2007
    3. Ryan Grant ran them into the playoffs. (most rushing yards in the last 9 games of the season)
    So I ask you who is going to catch the ball. You don’t even have a #1 reciever. You do have AP (only by accident) who is a great talent. You let a brilliant pro bowl center walk. Also if you think for one second, now that all the other leagues have joined in, the williams wall will be there your blind. Do you even have a safety or a LB on the team. Oh wait I forgot your only a piece away.
    ONE LAST THING I WILL BE AT THE QUEENS TRAINING CAMP IF BRENT DOES SIGN JUST TO LET HIM KNOW HOW MUCH PACKER FANS THINK OF HIM.
    HE QUITS ON THE TEAM THEN CRYS THAT WE DIDN’T SAVE HIS SPOT. THEN TURNS HIS BACK ON HIS FANS. WELL SORRY BRENT I GUESS I WAS WRONG ABOUT YOU. YOU STARTED IN THIS LEAGUE WITH THE FALCONS AND AS A JOKE NOW YOU’LL LEAVE IT AS A BIGGER ONE!

  66. J.Cannon says: Jul 14, 2009 8:50 PM

    Fucthm N. likdhsac did you change your name on my accord buddy?? Wow I must have struck a nerve. Looks like you do read other peoples posts dont you? Do you know what it is to contradict yourself? Look that one up guy. I will keep blowin my Vikings horn. You just make sure you keep blowin mine. mmmk?

  67. MasterShake says: Jul 14, 2009 9:26 PM

    jxhnne says:
    July 14, 2009 8:32 PM
    “I’ve had it! Why is every viqueen fan so blind. You morons sit and drink this kool-aid every offseason that your beloved boys in purple are only one piece away from a championship. Really? Farve is your answer? The only reason this whiny baby is even able to sucker the super intelligent chilly into getting him more money is:”
    (rant)
    “ONE LAST THING I WILL BE AT THE QUEENS TRAINING CAMP IF BRENT DOES SIGN JUST TO LET HIM KNOW HOW MUCH PACKER FANS THINK OF HIM.”
    Dude, you should go regardless. The Viqueens fans will either kill you or rape you. You deserve(or want) either.

  68. J.Cannon says: Jul 14, 2009 9:40 PM

    Hungry N. hadasnack? Is this the douche bag formely known as Fucthm and lickdhssac? Did you change your name on my accord? That is both sad and funny. I must have really hurt your feeling there guy. You say you don’t read other peoples posts yet you somehow know what I have been posting? You have contradicted yourself more than once in your little comback. Good to see I’ve got to you. As long as you keep posting retarted Vikings bashing bull s%^& I will keep bashing the nonsense that you say. Talk to you soon. Skoal

  69. jxhnne says: Jul 14, 2009 11:14 PM

    mastershack
    I have never been afraid or never will be afraid of fans dressed in purple.

  70. The Rock says: Jul 15, 2009 7:37 AM

    are you really a sports journalist? what a stupid topic.
    shame on you NBC sports for hiring a guy like this. get a life and talk about something we all like to hear – college football. Yeah!!!

  71. Hungry N. Hadasnack says: Jul 15, 2009 10:15 AM

    Gay.Cannon,
    F*CK NO I didn’t change my name!!–and certainly not because of any two-bit wang-riding dolt-hole horn-blower like you…so don’t flatter yourself.
    Man, you Queens fans and your perpetual DELUSIONS–do you know no bounds?
    And my posts and “combacks” are “retarted”, huh? That means they’ve been “tarted” all over again, re-soured perhaps?
    And yeah–I read the comments.
    I just don’t fixate on particular posters with abject, starry-eyed awe and follow them around like some stricken schoolgirl who’s continually bringing up the names of the most popular boys in school whenever there’s a conversation.
    That sad bit of masochistic worship is your forte, not mine.
    Otherwise–where, exactly are my (non-sarcastic) contradictions?
    Regardless, you’re a mere mosquito, alternately buzzing in my ear and nibbling on my nads–nothing more.
    I have BIGGER fish to fry–namely:
    That PFT took the liberty of changing my screenanme on ALL my posts!!
    Has anyone else been squeezed under PFT’s editorial thumb in such a direct, brutal and totalitarian manner?
    I can’t believe this HOLY SH!TPILE–Is this what we can expect of PFT under the new NBC regime??
    It’s ONE THING to edit a post for content–BUT TO ALTER SOMEONE’S SCREEN NAME, THEIR VERY IDENTITY?!?!?
    Wow. Maybe I should be flattered?
    (Or maybe I’ve rattled Florio’s cage one time too many? Maybe by going after his beloved Purple Fairies of the North…)
    Seriously–PFT did me the extreme honor of going back and changing my screename on ALL of my posts…isn’t that simulataneoulsy sad and frightening? (I’m serious!–go look!)
    I guess that’s their un-subtle way of asserting their right to censorship.
    Hmmm….gotta wonder how they’ll change THIS ONE…
    It’s alright though–I already have a few new screen names I’m considering:
    *J.Cannon’sSpellingTeacher
    *Purplehypehornblower
    *J.CannonLovesStuartSmalley
    *Skoalhole
    (that’s my favorite…but is that even how you spell “Skoal”–isn’t it “Skol”?!?!?
    It’s one thing to be a pathetic Dikings fan–but to not even be able SPELL the mindless little sign-offs/cheers…? That’d be like someone writing “Bare Down” or “Go Pak”)

  72. J.Cannon says: Jul 15, 2009 11:53 AM

    Snacky my boy good to here from you again. J.Cannon’sspellingteacher and purplehornblower would be great names for you but I have a couple of my own you might like. Hungry N. Cantseemysac, Hungry N. Talktoomuchcrap, Hungry N. Iamfat… I could keep going but I won’t waste my time. I think its funny that on every Vikings related post you have something off the wall to say. so like I said b4 just know that as long as your only comments are related to Vikings hate ill continue to make fun of the things you say. Hey Hungry N. Likepurplesac spell check this one for me. Thanks

  73. Willie Windex says: Jul 15, 2009 1:32 PM

    Wow…thats like saying that someone who lives in a nice house, would be willing to buy a broken down mobile home and live there for no apparent reason…genious.

  74. phishooks says: Jul 16, 2009 12:09 AM

    first off t-jack is a practice team all american, great in drills for scouts but put in a game his absence of brain becomes apparant. id bet he can hardly read….let alone look off 2 recievers and find the open guy with a min to go with kampman breathing down his neck… favre can…booya

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!