What's the end game for Vick in Philly?

Sal Paolantonio of ESPN has, within the past 30 minutes or so, provided some compelling analysis of the situation in Philadelphia regarding the use of Mike Vick in the team's offense.

Paolantonio addressed the various confusions and inconsistencies surrounding Vick's role, from Donovan McNabb's dismissive use of the term "gimmick" on Monday to the element of surprise that comes from using the Wildcat offense with the personnel grouping that already is on the field to the Kordell Stewart-style approach the Eagles will actually be using when bringing in Vick to the team's desire to make Vick into a full-time quarterback to Vick's recent vow that he plans to be a full-time quarterback again, soon.

It makes us wonder what precisely the team's ultimate plan is for Vick.

Though there's a chance they don't have a plan, we'll assume that this billion-dollar company regards the most important position on the field a bit more seriously than that.  

If the goal is to get the most out of Vick this year, then the focus should be getting him onto the field as a slot receiver, so that his periodic use as a quarterback will bring with it the "oh sh-t" factor as the opposing defense realizes that Vick has lined up to take the snap.

And that approach would mean not spending so much time remaking him into an every-down NFL quarterback, devoting some reps to teaching him how to run patterns and catch footballs.

So if the team is more committed to making Vick into an every-down NFL quarterback than it is to getting the biggest bang for their bucks, why are they doing it?

Obviously, if McNabb suffers a multi-game injury, having Vick ready to go will make the Eagles look like geniuses in hindsight.  But why would they invite the distraction and disruption associated with signing Vick for the primary purpose of upgrading the No. 2 quarterback?

And if the goal is to buy low and sell high, flipping Vick via trade in March, is the package of picks they'd get in 2010 justified by the short-term head-scratching and hand-wringing that Vick's presence has created?

Bottom line?  We think the Eagles wanted Vick so that they could spend the 2009 season assessing whether it makes sense come 2010 to make him the starting quarterback, and to dump Donovan McNabb.  That outcome -- Vick as a multi-year starting quarterback -- is the only scenario that ultimately validates the stresses and strains that the team will experience in 2009.

It doesn't mean that Vick will supplant McNabb come 2010.  But if the powers-that-be decide that Vick can play at a high level and if the powers-that-be decide that the window has closed on Donovan (who'll be 33 before the current season ends), the transition to new quarterback won't be nearly as dramatic if Vick already has been groomed to step in.

Some might regard the notion as blasphemy.  But Andy Reid surely didn't burn the 36th overall pick in the 2007 draft on Kevin Kolb because Reid thought that McNabb deserved a backup who was only four picks removed from being a first-round selection.  Reid and the Eagles have been looking for the next McNabb for more than two years, and the biggest thing they need to figure out in 2009 is whether Vick is that guy.

Along the way, they need to be sure that McNabb doesn't figure out that this is the real reason why they brought Vick to town.

Permalink 112 Comments Latest stories in: Latest News and Rumors, Michael Vick, NFL Mobile Exclusives - Rumors, Philadelphia Eagles, Top Stories

112 Responses to "What's the end game for Vick in Philly?"

  1. Cleveland Sucks aka Philly Sewer Rat says: September 1, 2009 11:37 AM

    End game? The Egirls aren't going to do anything with McNabb or Vick..they suck. You really think this team is going to beat the Giants? They will be lucky to make it to the playoffs as a wildcard team. They signed Vick to motiviate McNabb. Just wait for McNabb's first bad game, the entire city of Filthadelphia will be calling for Vick to be the starter.

  2. Kidekk says: September 1, 2009 11:37 AM

    I'm confused. You write speculation, then end with a definite. What's going on here?

  3. Philly5IsAlive says: September 1, 2009 11:38 AM

    Kudos for using the term 'end game'

  4. Kidekk says: September 1, 2009 11:39 AM

    And this whole "we" thing is starting to make me think you're Golem from Lord of the Rings.

  5. east96st says: September 1, 2009 11:41 AM

    "Along the way, they need to be sure that McNabb doesn't figure out that this is the real reason why they brought Vick to town."

    Based on Donnie's pouting, it's a safe bet that he already has. He can't win the big game, but he's not a moron. The handwriting on the wall was pretty obvious from day one.

  6. sn@ke says: September 1, 2009 11:42 AM

    another day, another Vick story....give it up Florio

  7. DonTerrelli says: September 1, 2009 11:44 AM

    ruh roh!!

  8. ASS-MAN says: September 1, 2009 11:45 AM

    "One of the most successful head coaches in recent NFL history, Andy Reid has really put his stamp on this city's beloved football team. After taking over a 3-13 club on January 11, 1999, Reid has been simply masterful in turning the Eagles into one of the NFL's elite teams."
    - Mike Florio 2005

  9. straverse says: September 1, 2009 11:48 AM

    Good work Florio, this crap story is sure to generate some mouse clicks.

  10. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 11:49 AM

    Who cares about what happens on the field? Don't you know? It's all about forgiveness and second chances.

  11. Art_Vandalay says: September 1, 2009 11:51 AM

    You are aware the only reason Philly signed Vick is because McNabb wanted him there, right? The organization had little interest in him. McNabb pushed Andy to get a deal done.

    The statements made in the 10th paragraph couldn't be further from the truth.

  12. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 11:54 AM

    Distractions are overrated. They brought in Vick to evaluate all of the above (buy low-sell high, mcnabb replacement, slash-style qb). Philly will still have a great year because they have a solid team loaded with talent unlike the team with punt blocking TV.

    Go Steelers!!!!!!!!!!

  13. REALPHAN says: September 1, 2009 11:57 AM

    C,mon VOX, this is a Philly article where is your insightful banter?

    -----------------------------------------------------
    As to the non-sense this article entails, specifically even wondering if Philly will take Vick over McNabb i the future....WHAT!!!???? WHY?? Why would they take a guy who knows the offense as well as McNabb does, and throw him out for a guy that has not played in two years? WHY?? Especially when we have seen that if anything, Reid stays with players way too long....Reno Mahe, Pinkston, and Greg Lewis, JUST BECAUSE They know the offense so well.

    See the problem here, is that your taking your information and insight from SAL P.A.L. This guy is reporting on a pre-season game...HAVE YOU NOT LEARNED THE PRE-SEASON MEANS ABOUT AS MUCH AS CLEAN UNDERWEAR TO VOX's MOM????!!!!

  14. stevemcguigan says: September 1, 2009 11:57 AM

    This doesn't make a lick of sense. Why would this team, who made it their business year after year of exposing Vick's weakness as a franchise quarterback, want to sign him with that position in mind?

  15. REALPHAN says: September 1, 2009 11:59 AM

    @ Sewer Rat....

    Uhhhh....the Eagles beat the Giants 2 times last year, once in playoffs....ask Brandon Jacobs when they stuffed TWICE on 3rd and 1 and again on 4th and 1!!!

  16. Fan_Of_ Four says: September 1, 2009 12:00 PM

    Favre Vick Favre Vick Favre Vick Favre Vick Favre Vick Favre Vick....I see a pattern forming here.

  17. Rickah99 says: September 1, 2009 12:01 PM

    Florio = Filly Fan!!!!

  18. surefooted says: September 1, 2009 12:01 PM

    Considering that Andy Reid traded his first rd pick and then drafted a QB with the second, signing Vick for his trade value later isn't really far fetched. Learn more about the team before you start making stupid Theisman-esque assumptions.

  19. Andre Park says: September 1, 2009 12:01 PM

    Mcnabb is a jealous little biznisquet, contradicting his own words, can't even give Vick few downs during pre-freaking-season. Go Skins!!

  20. wvugrad00 says: September 1, 2009 12:03 PM

    man florio have you visited the can recently, thats the most sh*t I have seen you spew in a while

  21. ASS-MAN says: September 1, 2009 12:04 PM

    Finally, an alliance forming between Steeler Nation and Eagle Nation. I mean, why not, we're both in PA and we both have Elite football organizations. Sorry all you other wanna-be hypocrits face it. Winning records and Playoff appearances are what these football teams are about... The Steelers are a down right Dynasty and the Eagles have been to the playoffs more times in the past 10 years then the cowboys or the giants, don't even ask about the Redskins, they just plainly SUCK.

    Go Eagles
    Go Steelers
    Go Pennsylvania

  22. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 12:06 PM

    @gayward

    Forgiveness and Second Chances

    1. TO
    2. Pacman
    3. Tank Johnson
    4. Leon Lett
    5. Hollywood Henderson
    6. Nate Newton
    7. Alonzo Spellman
    8. Michael Irvin
    9. Quincy Carter

  23. munkihed25 says: September 1, 2009 12:06 PM

    "Paolantonio addressed the various confusions and inconsistencies surrounding Vick's role, from Donovan McNabb's dismissive use of the term "gimmick" on Monday to the element of surprise that comes from using the Wildcat offense with the personnel grouping that already is on the field to the Kordell Stewart-style approach the Eagles will actually be using when bringing in Vick to the team's desire to make Vick into a full-time quarterback to Vick's recent vow that he plans to be a full-time quarterback again, soon."

    Longest run-on sentence. . . . . ever.

  24. DaleATL says: September 1, 2009 12:08 PM

    Kudos for not using the word "schism."

  25. Smush Rodrigez says: September 1, 2009 12:26 PM

    Cleveland Sucks aka Philly Sewer Rat says:
    September 1, 2009 11:37 AM
    End game? The Egirls aren't going to do anything with McNabb or Vick..they suck. You really think this team is going to beat the Giants? They will be lucky to make it to the playoffs as a wildcard team. They signed Vick to motiviate McNabb. Just wait for McNabb's first bad game, the entire city of Filthadelphia will be calling for Vick to be the starter.
    ****

    beat the Jersey Giants like they did twice (and should have 3) times last year???

  26. Smush Rodrigez says: September 1, 2009 12:30 PM

    Sal Pal is the only person who has been wrong about the Eagles and specifically mcNabb more than Florio.

  27. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:30 PM

    @ Steeler4life

    a.) Only one guy on your list has done something as grotesque as what Ron the Dog Drowner was convicted of
    b.) You just listed 9 Cowboys players
    c.) I am not a Cowboys fan

  28. Smush Rodrigez says: September 1, 2009 12:31 PM

    ASS-MAN says:
    September 1, 2009 12:04 PM
    Finally, an alliance forming between Steeler Nation and Eagle Nation. I mean, why not, we're both in PA and we both have Elite football organizations.

    ***

    I am in... I like the Steelers. Vox, we now have 6 superbowls. Suck it.

  29. gnop05 says: September 1, 2009 12:31 PM

    "...But why would they invite the distraction and disruption associated with signing Vick for the primary purpose of upgrading the No. 2 quarterback?"

    -- The only distraction that has been created, is by the media. The Eagles made a BUSINESS decision. They HAVE to drop SOMEONE to sign on Vick. That SOMEONE will be A.J. Feeley, unfortunately... not Kolb. Why not sign Vick? I was fire-coming-out-of-my-ears ANGRY when I heard the news about the signing. That anger lasted about 3 minutes until I realized, yes, he tortured dogs, yes, he's a scumbag - BUT, the Eagles signed him for business...BUSINESS. He is lethal to defenses, not to mention having another athletic QB on the field at the same time plus Westbrook and Jackson.

    In conclusion, this is merely a business decision by the Eagles: Sign a cheap, above average QB to throw in the slot for the, uh-hm, 'oh sh-t' factor.

  30. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 12:33 PM

    @Ass-man

    To an alliance!!!!!!

    At least you guys have worthy opponents (Redskins not included). The Browns, Bengals, and Ravens suck.

  31. tblitz25 says: September 1, 2009 12:37 PM

    Its almost comical how you look fat all the angles except the one that really matters most. Why would you assume that Donovan wants to resign with the Eagles. I love how you assume that he just will resign. Even if the Eagles are grooming Vick to be McNabb's replacement or even if the Eagles go out and win two super bowls what makes you think Donnie even wants to stay in Philly? You do know he lives in AZ and Kurt Warner has a two year contract. Dig a little deeper Florio and stop watching so much ESPN.

  32. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:37 PM

    @ ASS-MAN

    Speaking as an independent observer, I have not seen any evidence of this alleged PA alliance.

    Don't take my word for it though, go ahead and ask Cleveland Sucks aka Philly Sewer Rat how he feels about it.

  33. Jackal138 says: September 1, 2009 12:37 PM

    You're right, Steelers fans.

    It's high time the most talented team in the AFC and the most talented team in the NFC joined forces against the hordes of jealous haters that try to keep us down!

    I do my part, for sure, reminding Pats fans that they cheated to win all of their Superbowls. PA fans gotta stick together!

  34. idio says: September 1, 2009 12:37 PM

    You guys are making waaaaaaayy too much out of this. i can't wait for the regular season to start so these BS stories can go away.

    Bottom line:

    If Vick helps the team win, he plays. If not, he doesn't. Simple as that. McNabb will never, EVER be 'replaced' at QB by Vick. Vick IS a gimmick, who can occassionally throw the ball.

    How hard is this to understand??

  35. ASS-MAN says: September 1, 2009 12:47 PM

    Cheers to the Alliance.
    Dominance Prolonged!!!

    Go PA!

  36. empty13 says: September 1, 2009 12:51 PM


    of course mcnabb figured it out already. problem is, vick cant fill his shoes.

    and... mcnabb cant win a big game... true no sb wins but... what is his playoff record again... 9-6

    mcnabb record vs vick in playoffs... 2-0...

    ////////////

    pic of the day? rename it pick of the month.

  37. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 12:52 PM

    @hayward

    Which team do you support? Since you talk just about as much smack as Vox and Killapup, announce you team. You are always defending the Cowpokes.

  38. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:56 PM

    Jackal138:

    Pats fans don't care about your Eagles or any Philly team in general. Total apathy.

    On the other hand, your obsessive jealousy of anything Patriot-related is embarassing.

  39. Mike Vick, Pet Detective says: September 1, 2009 12:57 PM

    And I'll do my part in the alliance, too. I'll remind the Philly fans that they've never won a Super Bowl.

    And if it wasn't for steroids and biased officiating, Pittsburgh would never have won one, either.

    P.S. The state of Pennsylvania is a toilet.

  40. Cleveland Sucks aka Philly Sewer Rat says: September 1, 2009 1:00 PM

    I will never support the Egirls just because they are in the same state. For all of people saying we need to unite, go jump off a bridge. I hate each and everyone of you. The city of Philly is a dump. We have 6 Lombardi's trophy, the Egirls have none. Go to hell Filthadelphia, PA.

  41. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:06 PM

    "You are aware the only reason Philly signed Vick is because McNabb wanted him there, right? The organization had little interest in him. McNabb pushed Andy to get a deal done."

    So you're saying that the QB is playing GM?

  42. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:08 PM

    "C,mon VOX, this is a Philly article where is your insightful banter?"

    About a week to ten days ahead of everyone else. I said pretty much the same thing a week or two ago, only I don't have the Eagirls replacing McNabb with Vick next year.

  43. Drat says: September 1, 2009 1:09 PM

    Florio is dead right on this one, boys. I can't believe people have waited this long to talk about it. Of course the Eagles took on Vick in the hopes he will become the starter. Nothing else makes sense. Next season? Maybe. Or possibly by the end of this season, depending on how things unfold. And McNabb can feel it.

  44. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:11 PM

    "Finally, an alliance forming between Steeler Nation and Eagle Nation. I mean, why not, we're both in PA and we both have Elite football organizations. Sorry all you other wanna-be hypocrits face it. Winning records and Playoff appearances are what these football teams are about..."

    Yep. One's a couple of bad seasons away from an overall losing record, the other one's already got an overall losing record.

    Lowbrows of a feather, I guess.

  45. kbro says: September 1, 2009 1:12 PM

    The reason why they drafted Kolb is because at the time McNabb kept on getting injured so they needed insurance in case he got hurt again.

  46. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:12 PM

    "@gayward

    Forgiveness and Second Chances"

    Holy crap you freaking retard, when are you going to realize that Hayward's a Pats fan?

  47. isonic1 says: September 1, 2009 1:13 PM

    ASS-MAN,

    Not sure your comments are very logical. So should the Giants and Jets fan base unite also? Oh, and I guess running along those same lines perhaps the Chargers, 49ers and Raider fans should all love each other too. Yeah, I'm sure that is never gonna happen.

    Also, if the Redskins just plain suck why have the beat your team 3 out of last 4 times, including a season sweep last year???????

  48. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:14 PM

    "I am in... I like the Steelers."

    Can't blame you for dumping those loser Eagirls, Smush.

  49. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:16 PM

    "He is lethal to defenses"

    aaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahaha

    He sucked three years ago, but now he's "lethal to defenses" after eating prison food, getting prison workouts and crying in his cell while nursing his sore rectum for two years?

  50. DeVoodoo says: September 1, 2009 1:17 PM

    Jesus, Florio. Where's your ADD when we we need it? You literally just wrote an 85-word sentence. Is NBC paying you by the word?

    "Paolantonio addressed the various confusions and inconsistencies surrounding Vick's role, from Donovan McNabb's dismissive use of the term "gimmick" on Monday to the element of surprise that comes from using the Wildcat offense with the personnel grouping that already is on the field to the Kordell Stewart-style approach the Eagles will actually be using when bringing in Vick to the team's desire to make Vick into a full-time quarterback to Vick's recent vow that he plans to be a full-time quarterback again, soon."

  51. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:18 PM

    "Speaking as an independent observer, I have not seen any evidence of this alleged PA alliance. "

    Smuch has already jumped ship on his "beloved" Eagirls after many times assuring me that he is as diehard a fan as they come. I guess that passes for "diehard" in PA. Like I said, it's not hard to find the bandwagoners.

  52. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:19 PM

    And looks like that ol' fan thru thick and thin Jackal138 has given up hope as well.

  53. jusford says: September 1, 2009 1:26 PM

    Donavan to the Vikings in 2010 - bank on it.

  54. troll_aikman8 says: September 1, 2009 1:29 PM

    This all spells Bad Newz for 5.

  55. Whododrums says: September 1, 2009 1:31 PM

    @Steeler4life

    Why would you state the Bengals, Ravens and Browns suck if your a Steelers fan?? If this is the case, (which your a standard moron Steelers Fan), so it is not the case. Then the Steelers are just a lucky team that plays in an easy conference. However since, (as stated earlier you are a moron), you fail to understand that this conference is one of the two tuffest conferences in the NFL, probably the top conference, the Ravens are constantly in the top 6 Ds every year and the Bengals although are one of the NFLs punching bags are a very good team on paper just can't pull it together, but there D is also going to be in the top 10 this year. But the Browns do suck!

    I'm a Bengals fan, and don't cheer for the Steelers but would never say, no much how much I dislike them, that they suck, (even know they do have to purposely injure other teams players in the league to stay on-top).

  56. Bob S. says: September 1, 2009 1:58 PM

    How about the Eagles trading Vick to a team (and there are several right now) in need of a QB? Which may have been their purpose all along and get someone they need or a high draft pick in return, especially if Vick plays well in the final Eagles exhibition game?

  57. rockyla says: September 1, 2009 2:14 PM

    "Eagirls" is funny.

    When you're 8. Keep it up.

    And I don't know about any Pennsylvania alliance. But I do know that there isn't any real rivalry, which a lot of people assume or try to manufacture. Who aren't fans of either the Steelers or the Eagles.

  58. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 2:22 PM

    @whodonit

    You are the moron. Your argument would make sense if the Steelers were on the same level as the Bengals. However, they are not. We have won 6 Super Bowls, which means they are the tops in the league. We have won 2 in the last 4 years. It doesn't matter who is in the division, you still have to play NFL teams to win the Superbowl.

    @Vox

    I didn't know gayward was a Cheatriot fan.

    @PA Alliance

    Screw all the haters. They can't understand the excellence that comes out of the state.

  59. Smush Rodrigez says: September 1, 2009 2:28 PM

    Vox,

    Supporting another team does not make you dislike your own team. It is a second team with a common enemy - Cowboys. I am pretty sure an alliance does not really mean anything other than talking crap to the Cowboys fans on this site living in the glory years of 15+ years ago. For that, I am in.

    I will not be giving up my season tickets and I will not stop travelling to other cities to watch the Eagles and I will not stop making fun of Romo and Eli.

  60. Florios_a_tool says: September 1, 2009 2:30 PM

    "....# hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:56 PM
    On the other hand, your obsessive jealousy of anything Patriot-related is embarassing...."

    There you go again.
    Why would ANYone be jealous of the single most disgraced franchise (***) in recorded sports history?
    Talk about obsessed.
    Disgusted? yes
    Jealous? not in your lifetime.

  61. Smush Rodrigez says: September 1, 2009 2:31 PM

    Bob S. says:
    September 1, 2009 1:58 PM
    How about the Eagles trading Vick to a team (and there are several right now) in need of a QB? Which may have been their purpose all along and get someone they need or a high draft pick in return, especially if Vick plays well in the final Eagles exhibition game?
    ***

    Bob S., this is all about trading Vick in the offseason to a team in need for a draft pick. Vick does not become the starter for the Eagles, barring injury.

    Honestly, the Giants should have signed Vick. They could use him on windy downs so Eli's passes do not get blown back in his face.

  62. EskinSux says: September 1, 2009 2:31 PM

    These comments are funny........Where the hell this alliance between Pitts./Philly came from I don't know......But is sure as hell isn't happening in my household...My bet it's just a running joke.....I guess i could be juvenile like the sewer rat, and say i hate everything or whatever that "I got issues" diatribe was. I've been to Pittsburgh for a Steelers and Pirates games, always had a good time, and I will go back again. Damn, but i'm sure as hell not rooting for them......Or any other team for that matter...

  63. redsquare says: September 1, 2009 2:38 PM

    The so-called 'PA alliance' would mostly help the Eagles, who have NEVER WON a Super Bowl. They're the ONLY team in the NFC East who's never won:

    Cowboys: 5 Super Bowl wins
    Redskins: 3
    Giants: 3
    Eagles: 0

    Eagles fans love to call out, say, Dallas for not winning a playoff game in many years, but what do the Eagles have to show for all of their recent playoff "success"?

    A loss in the Super Bowl, and a string of losses in conference championships. Does anyone really think that any other NFC team would have lost after getting to that point so many times? History doesn't back it up.

    Sure, the other NFC East teams haven't won the big game in a while (the fantastic Giants win over the Pats excluded), but they are all certified Super Bowl champs, across multiple decades. As are the Steelers. "Playoff wins" only becomes criteria for greatness when that's all your team has to show for itself.

    So until the Eagles get their Super Bowl winner rings, they should probably be looking for alliances with, say, the Bills.

    But that might insult the Bills, who've been to more Super Bowls than the Eagles. Falcons, maybe? No, that wouldn't work so well these days. Hmm, Vikings? No, they've been to more Super Bowls than the Eagles too.

    Okay, how about the Bengals? They're a pretty good match, history-wise. (Sorry, Bengals fans--I know, I wouldn't want an alliance with them either.)

    Enjoy cheering for the sadistic dog torturer this year, Eagles fans, and explaining to your kids why that's okay. Betcha a Super Bowl ring would throw all morality right out the window.

  64. Florios_a_tool says: September 1, 2009 2:46 PM

    "....# hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:56 PM
    On the other hand, your obsessive jealousy of anything Patriot-related is embarassing...."

    Besides, a Steelers fan being jealous of the Patsies is like Pamela Anderson being jealous of a grade school girl in a training bra.

  65. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 2:50 PM

    @Smush

    "Honestly, the Giants should have signed Vick. They could use him on windy downs so Eli's passes do not get blown back in his face."
    ---------------------------------------------
    LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  66. Opie says: September 1, 2009 2:54 PM

    That was "compelling" what you saw from Sal Pal?!? Remind me never to take Florio's advice on what movie to go see. Next, Florio, you tell me Zoolander was compelling!?!

    Kbro----(thank you for being trying to educate folks)
    Kolb was drafted because McNabb was coming off 3 consecutive years where he didn't play a full season AND they didn't have anyone on their roster who could play if he got hurt again.

    Drat----- you're not bright. Vick will not start if Dnabb were to go down. That's Kolb's job.

    Vox ---- can't believe I'm going to agree with you, again, but I do. How can Vick, in current form, be labeled lethal to anything except dogs?!?

    Oh, and Vox, is "bandwagoners" an actual word? Or is it "bandwagoneers?"

  67. Bob S. says: September 1, 2009 2:57 PM

    EskinSux says:
    Where the hell this alliance between Pitts./Philly came from I don't know......
    --

    There really once was!

    The "Steagles" is the popular nickname for the team created by the temporary merger of two National Football League (NFL) teams, the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Philadelphia Eagles, during the 1943 season. The teams were forced to merge because both had lost many players to military service due to World War II.

    Officially the team was known simply as the Eagles (without a city designation), the Eagles-Steelers, or the Steelers-Eagles. The NFL never registered "Steagles" as a trademark. However, the official NFL record book refers to the team as "Phil-Pitt."

  68. Opie says: September 1, 2009 3:01 PM

    Seriously Florio?!? An 85 word sentence? I almost passed out trying to read it. Give me a comma, semi-colon, or dash.

    Smush: Hotlanta road trip 12/8, it will be a mad house!!

  69. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 3:04 PM

    @ Steeler4life:

    Were you talking to me? who is "gayward" and what is a "Cheatriot"? Perhaps if you talk like an adult people might potentially respect you.

    That aside, you clearly don't know much. I am a proud fan of the Patriots. You say I stick up for the "Cowpokes", which is not true, I just don't care about them one way or the other, considering NE has not lost to Dallas since 1996.

    Then again, you also didn't know that your very own Steelers lost to Dallas in Super Bowl XXX.

    I guess that was before you decided to become a "Steeler fan 4 life".

  70. ctfwest says: September 1, 2009 3:05 PM

    Those Eagles fan need to stop saying how great they have been this decade. You have done nothing. It only counts if you win a Super bowl. You barely got there once under Andy Reid. And against the Giants, the Eagles have a losing record. The Giants are 11-9 in the regular season against Andy Reid's Eagles 1-2 in the post season. Andy Reid is a choke coach. He can't win games of meaning.

  71. Jaydub says: September 1, 2009 3:09 PM

    Can you guys cry and whine any more? If the story doesn't include the author getting on their knees to service the Eagles' entire organization, you turn into a city full of pouting bitches. And here I thought Philly fans were supposed to be 'tough'...

    My 2 year old kid has bigger balls than you sissies

    Man up or shut up

  72. Bigbluefan says: September 1, 2009 3:11 PM

    WOW
    Vick sure is earning his money scum loves him and normal people want to watch him get killed

    As for teams joining together the egurls should join with detroit they both suck

    Any real Steelers fan would not be caught dead with a fan of the epukes

    Yes the epukes beat us in the playoffs last year oh well and the year before the giants won it all.

    As far as the Jets and giant fans getting together I would rather hang out in vox basement that with a jets fans or as we call them the renters

    I watched the Denver game nice to see a bunch of epukes where they belong the AFC worst

    And Elite and epukes do not go together unless the word is not elite

  73. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:12 PM

    Steeler4life says:
    September 1, 2009 12:06 PM
    @gayward

    Forgiveness and Second Chances

    1. TO
    2. Pacman
    3. Tank Johnson
    4. Leon Lett
    5. Hollywood Henderson
    6. Nate Newton
    7. Alonzo Spellman
    8. Michael Irvin
    9. Quincy Carter

    ______________________________

    Wait a minute here--Alonzo Spellman had a legitimate, clinical, psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia).

    Pretty unfair/ignorant to lump him in with what are mostly thugs, criminals, delinquents, and narcissists.

  74. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:17 PM

    jusford says:
    September 1, 2009 1:26 PM
    Donavan to the Vikings in 2010 - bank on it.
    _________________________________

    Yes, "Donavan" would be a PERFECT fit!

    He would bring hype, insecurity, over-rating by the media and fans, perennial disappointment/failure/choking, insecurity, a fragile ego and fragile body, high drama, and total instability at the QB position!!

    I can't wait! Vikings 2010 Super Bowl Champs!
    And 2011! And 2012!! And 2013!!! And 2014!!
    HELL, A WHOLE DECADE STRAIGHT!!!

  75. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:19 PM

    jusford says:
    September 1, 2009 1:26 PM
    Donavan to the Vikings in 2010 - bank on it.
    _________________________________

    Yes, "Donavan" would be a PERFECT fit!

    He would bring hype, insecurity, over-rating by the media and fans, perennial disappointment/failure/choking, insecurity, a fragile ego and fragile body, high drama, and total instability at the QB position!!

    I can't wait! Vikings 2010 Super Bowl Champs!
    And 2011! And 2012!! And 2013!!! And 2014!!
    HELL, A WHOLE DECADE STRAIGHT!!!

  76. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:19 PM

    jusford says:
    September 1, 2009 1:26 PM
    Donavan to the Vikings in 2010 - bank on it.
    _________________________________

    Yes, "Donavan" would be a PERFECT fit!

    He would bring hype, insecurity, over-rating by the media and fans, perennial disappointment/failure/choking, insecurity, a fragile ego and fragile body, high drama, and total instability at the QB position!!

    I can't wait! Vikings 2010 Super Bowl Champs!
    And 2011! And 2012!! And 2013!!! And 2014!!
    HELL, A WHOLE DECADE STRAIGHT!!!

  77. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:20 PM

    jusford says:
    September 1, 2009 1:26 PM
    Donavan to the Vikings in 2010 - bank on it.
    _________________________________

    Yes, "Donavan" would be a PERFECT fit!

    He would bring hype, insecurity, over-rating by the media and fans, perennial disappointment/failure/choking, insecurity, a fragile ego and fragile body, high drama, and total instability at the QB position!!

    I can't wait! Vikings 2010 Super Bowl Champs!
    And 2011! And 2012!! And 2013!!! And 2014!!
    HELL, A WHOLE DECADE STRAIGHT!!!

  78. ham1 says: September 1, 2009 3:22 PM

    @ Sewer Rat....

    Uhhhh....the Eagles beat the Giants 2 times last year, once in playoffs....ask Brandon Jacobs when they stuffed TWICE on 3rd and 1 and again on 4th and 1!!!


    Right, and that was your super bowl LOL, I guess,
    cuz your punk azz team aint ever won one HA HA HA HA


  79. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 3:27 PM

    I've lived in PA most of my life, so I'm very familiar with BOTH teams.

    Which is also why I'm a Bears fan (haha).

    Really, though--an "alliance"?

    Yeah, right--I also heard the Hatfields and McCoys were having a BBQ with the Klan and the Black Panthers, catered by the Nation of Islam with entertainment from the Israelis.
    Pakistan & India are running together in a 3-legged race.

    No self-respecting Steelers fan would even deign to associate himself with the likes of the philthiness coming from the Schukyll-all-the-dogs area...

    Of course, ever since Pittsburgh's won their 6th, they have collected some of the worst, most obnoxious, most insufferable fans this side of Minnesota--so I guess anything is possible.

    I just haven't seen it in my neck of Penn's woods.

  80. Jackal138 says: September 1, 2009 3:31 PM

    # hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 12:56 PM

    Jackal138:

    Pats fans don't care about your Eagles or any Philly team in general. Total apathy.

    On the other hand, your obsessive jealousy of anything Patriot-related is embarassing.

    --------------

    Is that why you feel compelled to respond to me EVERY single time I bring up the Patriots disgraceful history of cheating?

    Methinks thou doth protest too much.

  81. EskinSux says: September 1, 2009 3:35 PM

    So..redsquare.........what team in the NFC east are you a fan of?

  82. Steeler4life says: September 1, 2009 3:39 PM

    @hayward

    I put that SB out of my mind since Benedict O'Donnell was on the team.

    However, I do remember the Steelers spanking the Pats ass last year though. I also remember the 18-0 Pats losing in the Superbowl to Eli. freakin Eli "Opie" Manning.

  83. Jackal138 says: September 1, 2009 3:43 PM

    Jaydub says: September 1, 2009 3:09 PM

    Can you guys cry and whine any more? If the story doesn't include the author getting on their knees to service the Eagles' entire organization, you turn into a city full of pouting bitches. And here I thought Philly fans were supposed to be 'tough'...

    ---------------

    And here I thought New York fans could come up with an insult I didn't use on them yesterday.

    But that's just like most NYC Guidos. A day late and a dollar short.

  84. Jackal138 says: September 1, 2009 3:46 PM

    # VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 1:19 PM

    And looks like that ol' fan thru thick and thin Jackal138 has given up hope as well.

    ---------------------

    The Steelers are no threat to my Eagles, except the few times we play in the regular season. Not even the same conference. I'm not a fan, but I don't dislike them.

    But, I guess you're right - that's bad logic, because the Cowboys don't really threaten my team, either, yet I hate them with the passion of a thousand suns.

    44-6.

  85. EskinSux says: September 1, 2009 4:01 PM

    I'd comment.......But Jackal seems to have it covered........Why Giants and Pats and the Cowgirl frauds are commenting on a Vick blurb is beyond me.......

  86. east96st says: September 1, 2009 4:07 PM

    Smush Rodrigez says: "Honestly, the Giants should have signed Vick. They could use him on windy downs so Eli's passes do not get blown back in his face."

    And yet, Eli won a Super Bowl against a FAR more potent New England team than the one Donovan faced and lost to. And Donnie threw THREE INTS and puked on the field while Eli marched his team down the field in last minutes to win it all. If Donovan is SO superior, as you like to delude yourself that he is, why could Eli handle the Pats and Donnie could not? Harsh realities are hard to face but history proves in the biggest games McNabb can't get it done and Donovan's 3 INTs took away Philly's best chance at a Super Bowl win.

  87. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 4:07 PM

    Steeler4life says:

    However, I do remember the Steelers spanking the Pats ass last year though.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    I remember that game well. Being an objective fan, I can acknowledge Pittsburgh was the better team that day and all last year.

    Nonetheless, I also believe, off the top of my head, that Tom Brady is 5-1 all time vs. Pittsburgh including 2-0 in the playoffs. Thoughts?

  88. empty13 says: September 1, 2009 4:30 PM

    well i dont remember the eagles or steelers losing a "win and in" game as bad as ...

    6-44*.

  89. east96st says: September 1, 2009 4:37 PM

    EskinSux says: "Why Giants and Pats and the Cowgirl frauds are commenting on a Vick blurb is beyond me"

    Can't speak for the Pats or Dallas, but the Giants fans are here because you, Jackal, and Smush are usually in a race to see who will be first to post on a Giants story. That and the fact that you three think winning a playoff game in NY, only to turn around and lose to Arizona, is a great accomplishment.

  90. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 4:50 PM

    @ EskinSux

    Just for the record, if Ron the Dog Drowner was playing for the Seahawks, Lions or Jaguars, I would be posting there instead.

  91. redsquare says: September 1, 2009 4:51 PM

    Eskinsux, I'm actually a fan of all the teams in the NFC East (including the Eagles, up until they signed Vick, and will be again after they cut him and Reid). I'm more of a Cowboys fan than anything else--I follow them every year, a long-time (and often painful) habit begun when my family lived in Texas when I was born--but I enjoy a lot of teams. More than anything, I enjoy the sport.

    That is, I'm not one of these mouth-breathing dopes who wraps so much of their own self-identity in with one team that I refer to them as "we" and other teams as "you" and actually hate other teams and players just because they're not my team. There's fun "love to hate", and there's the ugly kind we see all over the place today.

    I've liked the Eagles plenty over the years. I loved watching Jaws & co. when I was a kid. I rooted for McNabb & TO against the favored Pats.

    My post wasn't even about the Eagles, but just a reality check against trash-talking fans. Though I will be no fan of the Eagles so long as they have Vick.

  92. Jaydub says: September 1, 2009 5:00 PM

    "Can't speak for the Pats or Dallas, but the Giants fans are here because you, Jackal, and Smush are usually in a race to see who will be first to post on a Giants story. That and the fact that you three think winning a playoff game in NY, only to turn around and lose to Arizona, is a great accomplishment."


    It's all they have. Nothing says 'pride' more than boasting about a 1-4 record in the NFCCG, but 'at least they made it that far'

    Beating the Giants last year was their annual Super Bowl. Their trophy case is full of origami. You know....pieces of PAPER folded into the shape of stuff. In this case, all of them resemble the Lombardi Trophy. A single spark in the vicinity could wipe out their entire history.

  93. Opie says: September 1, 2009 5:13 PM

    east96st: #1: to say Eli "marched" down the field, vs Pats, is a gross overstatement.
    #2: So, you're saying we beat the Giants BEFORE we lost to the Cardinals. So, we won the game and went further than you did, is that correct?

    Steeler4life: can you please not refer to Eli w/my moniker? How 'bout we call him a rich puppet......Howdy Doody comes to mind.

    BigBlueFan: epukes? Really? Nothing wittier than that?!? Really? How many Eagles play for Denver to equal a bunch in your book?

    Jaydub: we cry and whine? what are you reading?!?

    Ctfwest: So you say that Reid can't win big games and chokes? Then you follow that up with him being 2-1 vs. Giants in playoffs?!? You contradict yourself, dumbass! Plus, you've got to get to the big games in order to choke. No easy games in the NFL and he wins more than he loses. Two words for you "Fact check!"

    I smell fear on you and the other Giants' oompa loompa's!

    And you should be scared! Your defense is falling apart, you've got no wide receivers, and your qb just got paid huge dollars he didn't deserve.........you guys are real bright!

  94. Dewey Axewound says: September 1, 2009 5:26 PM

    hayward giablommi says:
    September 1, 2009 4:50 PM
    @ EskinSux

    Just for the record, if Ron the Dog Drowner was playing for the Seahawks, Lions or Jaguars, I would be posting there instead.
    _________________________________

    I second that.

    Against the cacophony of mindless lemmings in the media chanting:

    "Sec-ond chance!! Sec-ond chance!!"

    SOME of us have to be the moral voice of reason/dissent that speaks against the sad tidal wave of immorality and apathy that shamelessly values *talent* over deceny, humanity, good taste, or justice.

  95. east96st says: September 1, 2009 5:32 PM

    Opie says: "to say Eli "marched" down the field, vs Pats, is a gross overstatement."

    And what did McNabb do in similiar circumstances? Blew chunks. Wow. Impressive.

    "So, you're saying we beat the Giants BEFORE we lost to the Cardinals. So, we won the game and went further than you did, is that correct? "

    Yep. And that got you, what? Where's the Lombardi?

    "you guys are real bright!"

    Bright enough to know that if your favorite team hasn't won the Super Bowl you really shouldn't be talking trash. Just makes you look like an ignorant jackass.

  96. hayward giablommi says: September 1, 2009 5:36 PM

    @ Dewey Axewound

    Amen. I have never rooted against the Eagles, loved watching Randall Cunningham and blowhard Buddy's defenses back in the day.

    But my conscience now demands that I root against the Eagles every week as long as Dog Drownin' Ronny is wearing green. And yes, I would be just as outraged if Mex was playing for my team.


  97. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 6:00 PM

    "Supporting another team does not make you dislike your own team."

    One team, smush. One team only. You're gonna profess your love for the Steelers after they won the Super Bowl and you expect anybody else to believe that you're not a bandwagon-riding fool? Seriously? You were probably a Rams fan 10 years ago, weren't you?

  98. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 6:06 PM

    "The Steelers are no threat to my Eagles"

    Except fopr the fact that their presence makes Philadelphia wish that it had a professional football team... now the the Philly Soul has folded haha

  99. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 6:08 PM

    "I'd comment.......But Jackal seems to have it covered........Why Giants and Pats and the Cowgirl frauds are commenting on a Vick blurb is beyond me......."

    You know, it's that whole interest in the NFL thing.

  100. VoxVeritas says: September 1, 2009 6:10 PM

    "well i dont remember the eagles or steelers losing a "win and in" game as bad as ..."

    Of course not, you've only been an Eagirls fan for what, 6 or 7 years now?

  101. EskinSux says: September 1, 2009 6:28 PM

    east96st says:
    September 1, 2009 4:37 PM
    EskinSux says: "Why Giants and Pats and the Cowgirl frauds are commenting on a Vick blurb is beyond me"

    Can't speak for the Pats or Dallas, but the Giants fans are here because you, Jackal, and Smush are usually in a race to see who will be first to post on a Giants story.
    ------------------------------------------
    Maybe the Giants fans just need to get laid or something.....

  102. EskinSux says: September 1, 2009 6:30 PM

    You know, it's that whole interest in the NFL thing.
    ---------------------------------------
    Yeah Ok, this from the one who has to wiggle his ears when Jerry Jones balls itch.....

  103. Opie says: September 1, 2009 6:39 PM

    east96st:

    "And what did McNabb do in similiar circumstances? Blew chunks. Wow. Impressive."

    Is 357 yards and 3 TD's vs. NE impressive? 375 yards and 3 TD's vs. Az impressive?

    "Yep. And that got you, what? Where's the Lombardi?"

    Um, got us one game further than your beloved Giants.

    "Bright enough to know that if your favorite team hasn't won the Super Bowl you really shouldn't be talking trash. Just makes you look like an ignorant jackass."

    Actually, I haven't even begun to talk trash. What I was doing was pointing out to you that you've got your facts wrong and giving you a nice spanking before sending you to your room w/out dinner........

  104. Jaydub says: September 1, 2009 7:16 PM

    "Yep. And that got you, what? Where's the Lombardi?"

    Um, got us one game further than your beloved Giants."


    And this is impressive because.....?

    Moral of the story, simpleton: Most people with even marginal brain function don't thump their chests over a loss. The Giants fell short but still walked away with a Division title. The Eagles walked away with one more piece of paper for their trophy case, and you seem to be very proud of it.

    Your 'beloved' Eagles are not capable of living up to your pipe dreams. They will always fail, just like you will always fail. Stick with each other forever.

  105. Opie says: September 1, 2009 8:41 PM

    Jaydub: Okay, I see that I will have to slow down for you.

    You know, you're right, it's not really that impressive to beat the Giants........

    "Moral of the story, simpleton: Most people with even marginal brain function don't thump their chests over a loss."
    -----------------------------------
    I'm not "thumping" over a loss, it's about beating the Giants...... If you lose (like the Giants lost to the Eagles), then you shouldn't talk shit to who? ................Come on, you can say it....... that's right the Eagles!! You see how that works? Got it now?

    The Eagles walked away with one more piece of paper for their trophy case, and you seem to be very proud of it.
    ------------------- what is this paper you speak of?

    Now, we'll just have to see who does what, this season, to see where my pipe dream ends up.

    Based on your definition of failure, it's either you're the Super Bowl champion or a complete failure?!?

    Then you must be miserable........oh wait, you're a Giants fan so you are pretty miserable aren't you?!?

    Now go lay out your clothes for school before you go to bed, the short bus comes early for you special kids.......

  106. Jolly says: September 1, 2009 8:43 PM

    Jaydub said...
    "Moral of the story, simpleton: Most people with even marginal brain function don't thump their chests over a loss. "

    Deep....and you were winning the argument too. Untill you said this...
    "The Giants fell short but still walked away with a Division title."

    So the Eagles fans should not thunp their chest at the Division winners after putting a beatdown on them at home, but the Giants fans should thump theirs after getting beat at home after the bye they got from that division title (which is all a Division title is really good for)?

  107. Poopdollar says: September 1, 2009 10:41 PM

    Vox seriously beat it you dope. You are a cockaroach, the scum of the earth who is just like every other white trash Texas hillbilly with your Dallas stars on your assless chaps. Your QB passes out in the shower after getting RAPED by the Eagles on a game where the Cowboys could have knocked us out of the playoffs. We then march into Minny and beat them - make Eli cry because his boyfriend shoots his toothpick leg. We lose to the cardinals NOT BECAUSE OF MCNABB, if you remember correctly he DID come back to win the game, but the defense lets up a 13o yd drive all thanks to Dawkins who was too old to be playing in the first place.

    Sorry I got off track for a bit. There are so many Eagles haters in year posting over 100 posts just because they are jealous of this city and the fact it is the best sports town in the country. Say what you will about it, but we have passion and know more shit about our sports than any of you 'so-called' fans for your respective cities. Dont even get me started on Pittsburgh - I'd rather have no championships than live in that town. Their main attraction is fries on top of a f*ckin sandwich - way to go guys, nice and creative. You fagets dont even have cheerleaders. If thats not gay then I dont know what is.

    Back to '6' again DO NOT speak on our message board. WE OWN YOU.

    And by the way...the Soul hasn't folded dicknuts - the whole league was canceled this year

    signed 44


    **watch out for that dolllar - it may have poop on it!

  108. redsquare says: September 2, 2009 12:48 AM

    @Dewey & hayward -

    Right on, fellas. Count me among those who will not stop reminding Eagles fans about the sadistic dog torturer in their favorite team's midst.

    I won't be a fan of that team so long as that thug is on the roster. And I'd have disowned my fave Cowboys or any other team just as surely if they'd been the ones to take him.

  109. Jackal138 says: September 2, 2009 1:26 AM

    east96st says:

    Can't speak for the Pats or Dallas, but the Giants fans are here because you, Jackal, and Smush are usually in a race to see who will be first to post on a Giants story.

    ------------------------

    Oh yeah. I've never seen you, Jaydub, BigBlue, empty13 or any of the other Giants fans EVER post something anti-Eagles or anti-Philadelphia.

    If only it weren't for those big, bad, mean Philly posters, boo hoo hoo.

    Get real. You like trash talking, too. It's all or nothing. I read this forum for months before deciding to get involved in the scrum. If you all shut up, I'd shut up. But that won't happen.

  110. Opie says: September 2, 2009 9:30 AM

    Jolly said "Deep....and you were winning the argument too. Untill you said this...
    "The Giants fell short but still walked away with a Division title."
    -------------------------------
    east96st was winning no such argument, just rambling and jumping from one thing to another. Kinda like Riccochet Rabbitt, if you remember that cartoon.

    Truthfully, it wasn't much an argument when one person isn't using facts as the basis for their point of view. If it's merely an opinion, well then, to each their own.

    In another couple months, we'll know how everything plays out.

  111. Jackal138 says: September 2, 2009 12:24 PM

    "In another couple months, we'll know how everything plays out. "

    Eagles at the top, Cowboys at the bottom, and the Giants and Redskins sandwiched helplessly in between, going "If we win 4 games in a row, we can make a Wild Card!"

  112. clemenza says: September 27, 2009 9:30 PM

    let me make shure i understand your claim florio,being from here i know the whole story how mcnabb pushed hard to bring vick to philly and all so "the dog fighting kid" vick could take mcnabb(the guy who really lobbied hard to bring vick to philly) job from him next year.....you are a total nitt-witt florio and do yourself a favor and stop writing stupid stories about vick you idiot

Leave a Reply

Logout

You must be logged in to post a comment. Not a member? Register now!