Comments on: Packers finally bring back Tauscher

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:39:56 +0000

The refs, DWIs, pot, blah blah blah. More shit from you I’ve never brought up. Keep it up. If you make up this many excuses when your team is undefeated it’ll be hilarious to read your shit when they flunk out of the playoffs and Favre retires.
Again.
And just look at you. Failing to produce on your promises. Again. Words, words, words.. But no action.
Bottom line: you didn’t find shit because I don’t make predictions and I don’t run my mouth about how great the Packers are.
But you’ll keep this up because you’re a ninny with nothing better to do than make himself look like a stupid dafodil. And because you’re unable to let someone else have the last word.
Anyway, I’ve thrown stats at you, I’ve reminded you that your defense has been mediocre against some of the worst offenses in the league. You’ve never responded with facts. Unless you find an obscure alternate ranking to help you sleep better on that big purple pillow of yours.
Don’t worry, chicken. I’m sure Uncle Brett will fulfill all your purple dreams and finally bring home a trophy for that empty case in the Metrodump. And then Zygi can start looking for another QB for 2010. Maybe the euphoria will actually provide an environment conducive to building a new improved indoor playground for your purple boys. And you’ll need to scrub out the protein stains in those purple footy pajamas of yours.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:38:15 +0000

You calling me stupid is laughable, it really is.
Unlike you, I seem to have a life, don’t worry. I’ll get around to it.
You better be careful there Sparky, you may have a gripper in front of the keyboard.
An objective view of my team? They are 5-0.
Beat 3 teams by over 2 tds per, were leading the Packers with SEVEN MINUTES AND TWENTYFIVE SECONDS TO GO.
Went into a soft zone and made asshats like you feel like you were actually in the game.
God you are pathetic. What are you waiting for, me to say the packers are good?
They suck and so do you for thinking otherwise.
debate statistics? The only stats that matter are wins and losses…5-0. 2-2!
Oh wait Minnesota had the 14 th ranked D in week 5, oooooh they suck……idiot
Wait i have a stat here that proves the Vikes record is a mirage!
Jared Allen has 2 dwi’s and Percy smoks pot, games shouldn’t count.
If it wasn’t for the refs…
Piss off you big crybaby.
That you”ll be waiting is proof enough to me that you have no life. What a pathetic loser.
You know what the funniest thing of all is? I’ve told you in not one but 2 posts that I’m pulling your chain, TRYING TO PISS YOU OFF, yet you still don’t get it.
Yeah, I’m sure the stupid one out of the 2 of us….
I hit the return key alot there…just 4 you.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:38:31 +0000

Chickenphallus:
No, I’m not resorting to typing errors. I’m calling you stupid. There’s a difference.
At no point in any of our discussions have you EVER brought any facts to the table. All you ever do is insult, falsely attribute quotes and hit the enter key as much as possible. That’s what you do. You don’t care to debate the actual statistics or look at actual facts. You don’t care to take an objective view of your team.
Yes, I called purple faggy. As does everyone other sane, normal, straight man in this country. Know why? Because purple IS faggy. That’s why. But then again, so is wearing blonde wigs. So maybe they cancel each other out or something.
Hey dipshit, whatever happened to your research? You remember typing this?
“While I’m not at work, I’ll do some research. I’m positive that you will have some explaining to do.”
How did that work out for you? It must’ve gone stunningly well, considering you’ve got jack shit to show for it. So how about you put your money where your mouth is and follow through on something? I’ll be waiting.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:29:01 +0000

Chickendick:
No, I’m not resorting to typing errors. I’m calling you stupid. There’s a difference.
At no point in any of our discussions have you EVER brought any facts to the table. All you ever do is insult, falsely attribute quotes and hit the enter key as much as possible. That’s what you do. You don’t care to debate the actual statistics or look at actual facts. You don’t care to take an objective view of your team.
Yes, I called purple faggy. As does everyone other sane, normal, straight man in this country. Know why? Because purple IS faggy. That’s why. But then again, so is wearing blonde wigs. So maybe they cancel each other out or something.
Hey dipshit, whatever happened to your research? You remember typing this?
“While I’m not at work, I’ll do some research. I’m positive that you will have some explaining to do.”
How did that work out for you? It must’ve gone stunningly well, considering you’ve got jack shit to show for it. So how about you put your money where your mouth is and follow through on something? I’ll be waiting.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:04:39 +0000

Pissandmoanerson:
Now you are resorting to my typing errors?
That’s the sign of a defeated man.
No real events, numbers or facts? Are you high?
You must be.
I insult you because you deserve it.
You haven’t ever proved me wrong jagoff, it’s an OPINION page!!!
be a hypocrite—–hello pot, this is the kettle, you’re black.
Then to top it all off let’s throw in the “faggy” clothes and wigs…lol
The only thing that was funny or original out of that post, was skoal bandits…I like that.
Anyway, asshat. I posted last night, what i had to say. I told you, you were a fool, because i was playing you like a violin. Yet, what do you do? Just try to walk away with your dignity intact?
No, you come back with one of your lamest posts ever. It took you all this time to come up with something that even Jimmy and Bob would be ashamed to post?
I’m actually embarassed for you.
It’s time for you to just take your big mouth and your ” inkow more than you” attitude elseswhere.
Nobody here cares about your pontifications.
All it amounts to is you trying to prove the packers don’t suck ass.. It’s boring and very tiresome. Get lost!

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:11:48 +0000

Chickndick’s rulz of intergoogle posteing:
- Nevr ooose real events or numbers. Thems doesnt always makes the Vikings look gud.
- Always poste based on emoshun and shun them facks. Emoshuns is bettr then facks.
- Oose lotz of insutls an not much come on cents. Insultz flummoxes thems.
- Hit that there return key afta every peeriod. That maks it looks like youse gots mor ta say.
- Twiste tha argument inta jus a insult fest.
- When dey proofs you rong on sumting, oose a diffrent ranking to say you rite. If they aint got no other ranking, ignor it. Toss in sum more dem insultz.
- Be hippocrit and refoos to admit it.
- Where faggy purple cloths and blond wigs. Trie to ack like its normul or manly. Dunno why, thats jus wut we due.
- Skoal bandits!

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:08:58 +0000

you still here?
You are an asshat. You are a blowhard that thinks he knows better than everyone else on this site.
No one really cares what you have to say, i don’t really either.
I’m just making it my goal to out you for the idiot you are every time you post.
Keep coming back moron.
you think pretty highly of your posting skills don’t you? I really don’t know why.
It’s the same slapdick bile that Jimmy and Bob post every day.
the funny thing is, is that you think you are getting the best of me, you aren’t.
It’s not about “points” it’s about getting you so riled up, that you can’t even get your posts on the site.
I’m sure you are so pissed that it was filled with unheard of vulgarity…..all the while I’m sitting here laughing at you and how pissed you are getting for no reason!
you get suckered in every time, I find it hilarious and it amuses me to pisss you off so badly.
You see, I took a dislike to you from the start. Your insatiable need to answer every post with a retort, the condescending tone of your posts, like you are some eminent sage on all things NFL.
You are just another loud mouth Packer fan that thinks it’s your birthright to have a winning team ever year. Dust off the trophies when your team bewilders you and piles up loss after loss.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, your former icon is helming a bitter rival to a 5-0 start.
I bet that just frosts your pop tarts doesn’t it?
You haven’t even come near to slapping me in the face or kicking my balls.
That you think I give 2 farts in the wind what you say is even more comical.
That you can’t see I’ve been playing you like a violin from day one is incredible.
Tine for bed adam, I’ll be at a sattelite clinic of the hospital I work for in the am, I’ll rest assured that your next post will dazzle me……
Now you know that I was playing with you, like a cat plays with a mouse, maybe you”ll just shut up.
I doubt it though. You have to ” kick my balls”, right?
Pathetic.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:41:20 +0000

Well, once again my response was deemed unfit for the delicate eyes perusing this website. Just slap yourself in the face twice and have someone kick you in the balls. That would have the same effect as reading my response.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:55:27 +0000

You are limiting yourself because your knowledge is limited!
I’m a homer? Jesus H. Christ!! you sitting here defending your tard of a GM and HC with spittle hanging off your chin!
All the while thinking that the Pack has some sort of chance this year.
You can give that a rest.
Obviously genius, yards allowed is not a very good indicator of where teams rank. It’s what the NFL uses, so that’s how they are ranked.
I’ll take 14 anyway, it’s led us to 5-0. Piss and moan all you want thae Packers are still 2.5 games back and are irrelevant to the season.
I will pat myself on the back. If anything I did causes you to come here less or not at all, I consider that a blessing.
It’s asshats like you who ruin this site, not me.
You think you have this vast plethora of knowledge that you feel the need to impart to everyone. I got news for you, you don’t know squat!
Oh, and I’m supposed to remember every word from the myriad of post you’ve made? really?!
You know you ran your mouth, so does everyone else.
While I’m not at work, I’ll do some research. I’m positive that you will have some explaining to do.
As for the Aikman ratings, I’m of the understanding that the NFL is considering adopting this as the official stats for the league.
Take it as you will, the Packers blow this year, you’d think you’d stop running your mouth, but no, you are a Packer fan, hear you roar!!

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:49:21 +0000

In case u can’t figure it out, it’s a copied website.
The comments to beging and end the post are mine.
Otherwise you’d be bitching that “I don’t even know who my team plays”, right?
Eat the crow? Hardly.
You should be eating heaping platefuls of it for all the yapping you did in the preseason.
We all know that won’t happen.
Really, Just leave.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:45:07 +0000

Well, well. Pissandmoanerson is back!
Oooh so you were here for 2 posts and got out quick, not your normal answering every last post usual.
14th is above average—-average is 16.
Piss and moan all you want, you arent accounting for turnover, 3rd down eff. or anything like that.
Yards are just 1 facet, I learned this From Supersuckers.
Check out Aikmans eff. ratings.
Vikes 1 offense
Vikes3 defense
Here you go:
Offense
Aik NFL Team AER
1 19 Vikings (n) 91.7
2 3 Saints (n) 90.4
3 4 Colts (a) 89.6
4 5 Ravens (a) 89.0
5 15 Dolphins (a) 87.6
6 7 Steelers (a) 87.3
7 2 Giants (n) 86.9
8 9 Patriots (a) 84.8
9 13 Falcons (n) 84.4
10 1 Cowboys (n) 84.4
11 8 Eagles (n) 84.0
12 14 Packers (n) 81.7
13 6 Broncos (a) 81.1
14 24 Jets (a) 78.6
15 20 Jaguars (a) 77.8
16 22 Bears (n) 77.6
17 18 Bengals (a) 76.9
18 12 Seahawks (n) 76.5
19 21 Lions (n) 76.3
20 30 Chiefs (a) 74.9
21 17 Titans (a) 74.3
22 29 49ers (n) 74.2
23 10 Chargers (a) 73.6
24 11 Texans (a) 72.9
25 26 Buccaneers (n) 70.5
26 23 Redskins (n) 69.0
27 16 Cardinals (n) 68.4
28 25 Bills (a) 60.9
29 27 Panthers (n) 60.3
30 31 Browns (a) 56.8
31 32 Raiders (a) 55.4
32 28 Rams (n) 54.3
NFL Average 76.8
Aikman Efficiency Ratings Through Week 5, 2009 — Defense
Aik NFL Team AER
1 2 Broncos (a) 94.0
2 6 Saints (n) 94.0
3 14 Vikings (n) 86.9
4 3 Eagles (n) 82.8
5 1 Giants (n) 80.3
6 10 Ravens (a) 80.3
7 4T Redskins (n) 79.9
8 11T Seahawks (n) 79.4
9 9 Jets (a) 78.6
10 17 Bengals (a) 78.3
11 16 49ers (n) 77.6
12 20 Falcons (n) 77.5
13 7 Colts (a) 77.4
14 8 Dolphins (a) 75.4
15 13 Bears (n) 74.6
16 27 Cardinals (n) 74.3
17 4T Steelers (a) 71.7
18 11T Patriots (a) 71.5
19 31 Raiders (a) 70.6
20 21 Cowboys (n) 69.9
21 18 Packers (n) 68.5
22 29 Browns (a) 68.1
23 23T Titans (a) 67.5
24 30 Jaguars (a) 66.7
25 15 Panthers (n) 66.5
26 23T Texans (a) 64.6
27 19 Bills (a) 64.1
28 28 Buccaneers (n) 63.9
29 23T Rams (n) 63.7
30 32 Chiefs (a) 61.4
31 26 Chargers (a) 60.7
32 22 Lions (n) 59.1
NFL Average 73.2
The offense doesn’t surprise me, but I am a bit surprised by the D I guess the Miami game is still skewing results a bit. Any way I have always founf the AERs to be a better ranking system than just about anything else devised (at least that has been devised for general viewing by the public and not the systems mathematicians have developed for the betting industry)
Here’s how the AERs are determined.
Aikman Efficiency Ratings Formula
“The Aikman Efficiency Ratings measure offensive and defensive performance using a combination of seven key statistics identified by Troy, and then measured against league norms (and extremes) established over the last 10 years. An offense or defense performing exactly at league norms in all categories will achieve a score of 75. The better the offense or defense, the higher the score on either scale.
It will take a truly exceptional unit to score more than 90 during an entire season on either the offensive or defensive scale. Higher scores are possible in individual games.
In 2005, AER scores ranged on offense from 92.6 (Seattle) to 60.9 (San Francisco) and on defense from 89.3 (Chicago) to 61.1 (Houston). The seven categories measured are:
Adjusted Points (20%) — Total Points Scored or Allowed minus Points on Returns and Safeties
Turnovers (20%)
Red Zone Efficiency (20%) — Measured by Percent of Possible Points (see below)
Yards Per Play — divided into Yards Per Rush (10% of total) and Yards Per Pass Play (10% of total). Yards Per Pass Play includes yards on plays involving sacks.
First Down Achievement — divided into Total First Downs (10% of total) and 3rd Down Conversion Percentage (10% of total)
Percentage of Possible Points in the Red Zone is figured by taking the number of Red Zone Chances times 7, then dividing it by the number of Points Actually Scored (defined as TDs times 7 plus FGs times 3). ”
Link:
http://forum.colts.com/showthread.php?t=46227
You need to do what you say you were going to and just leave the site. It will be better off w/o you.
But, I’m sure you’ll TRY to blow these #’s out too.
Worry about your own pathetic team, not ours, ok?
is that too much too ask? I bet it is.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:02:47 +0000

Oh, and nothing to say about your stupid comment that I wasn’t here last week? Eat the crow, dumbshit. Chew it well. You don’t want to choke. That would be a tragedy.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:59:28 +0000

Now you’re going to claim that 14th is good for the defense? You wouldn’t have admitted that before the Vikings slipped down that far. Yes, 14 is in the upper half. But it’s also mediocre.
On the LBs and secondary:
I didn’t say they were horrible. I said they were not good. Big difference, but not one that I expect you to see. You’re too busy putting your words in my mouth for those little details.
You can try to explain away the defense’s deficiencies all you want, but the facts will always get in the way.
The facts:
- No team has outscored their opponents more than the Giants, but their defense is ranked #1 overall. The Saints are also undefeated and have been involved in more blowouts than the Vikings. Their defense is ranked #6 overall. The Broncos are undefeated and have outscored their opponents by a wide margin. Their defense is ranked #2 overall. So I don’t buy this notion that the Vikings are giving up lots of yardage because they’re blowing teams out. They’re just not that good. There’s other teams blowing out their opponents AND still stopping them on defense.
- If the Vikings were giving up lots of yards because they were blowing teams out, then their rushing yardage allowed would be anemic because teams would be passing on them to try to score quickly. And yet their rush defense is ranked #10 in the league after three consecutive years of leading the league in rush defense.
- They’ve played some of the worst offenses in the league so far this season and their defense is still ranked in the middle of the pack. Teams are moving the ball at will against the Vikings, as evidenced by the Rams (28th offense in the league) rolling up 400 total yards on them.
- Chad Greenway and Ben Leber agree with me. http://www.startribune.com/sports/vikings/64178942.html?elr=KArksi8cyaiUo8cyaiUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiUr
Yes, 5-0 is 5-0. And I do accept that. But 14 is also 14. And you’re not accepting that.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:03:53 +0000

At least you know your place Adam.
You are right, you are a slow learner.
If I caused you to leave this site, or “scale back”( does that mean you are only going to retort back to every other post)? Then I consider that a bonus for every other poster on this site.
I never said the Vikes were flawless. Ever.
I never said they were going to the Super Bowl.
14 isn’t that good for defense? out of 32? It’s in the upper half.
You know when you pull ahead and win by 2 tds your 1st 2 games, have a tight one in SF, lead GB by 16 with 7 minutes to go and lead the Rams 24-3 very early in the THIRD quarter, it’s hard not to give up garbage yards.
You do know rankings are based on yardage allowed correct?
You are definitely wrong in saying that the back 7 isn’t good, they aren’t the best ever, but not horrible either.
It’s a good thing we have that d-line…..wouldn’t want to be exposed.
5-0 is 5-0…deal with it.
Don’t go away mad pissandmoanerson, just go away.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:14:08 +0000

Chickenfoot says:
October 12, 2009 3:16 PM
Adam:
Really?! That’s your comeback?
Where were you all week? The tears finally dry up?
Freaking blowhard windbag leading up to the game, and then you can’t show up for a WEEK afterwards?
Honestly, I figured you to be that type of fan. I really did.
You are one of the masses that thinks your team is Superbowl bound every year, and are dumbfounded when they suck.
What are you going to do when the Lions beat the Packers this week? Will you be gone a month then?
You are a horrible fan and an even worse poster.
I bet you suck at life as bad as you suck at posting on PFT don’t you?
I’m willing to bet thats the case.
——————————–
I posted a response to your pathetic little question yesterday. For whatever reason, “the powers that be” chose not to allow it to hit the site.
I’ll restate it, with probably slightly less inflammatory language. I WAS HERE on Tuesday. Dicknose. In fact, we traded insults on more than one thread on Tuesday. Dicknose.
Look it up, idiot:
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/06/packers-vikings-one-liners-1/
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/06/jared-allen-is-a-beast-favre-sheds-a-burden/
And in my post yesterday I mentioned that I’ve been coming here less because (although I’m a slow learner) I’m realizing that daffodils like you, Vikes-N-Favre, Fanof4, etc will never listen to reason. So this is a waste of my time. And I’ve been pulling back. I have better things to do than highlight the idiocy of your inane ramblings.
Anyway, your little pathetic insults just seem funny. I’m not going to stoop to your level and make broad assumptions about what it is you do for a living or how terrible you might be at it.
What’s really funny, though, is how you make me out to be some irrational fan who can’t accept reality. In reality, I expected a loss on Monday night (as I posted both before AND after the game). In reality, I know the Packers won’t go anywhere if they can’t protect Rodgers. And even if they do protect Rodgers, they need more pressure on opposing QBs and they need more production in the running game. Those are the biggest problems facing this team and they are big problems.
You, on the other hand, are unable to see or accept the limitations and weaknesses of your team. You fail to realize that their defense is not very good. Last year they won games because of their defense. This year they’re winning games because of their offense. They get plenty of pressure on the QB (especially when they play GB), but the linebackers and secondary are not good. Without that great defensive line they’d be exposed.

By: packers4life

packers4life — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:43:52 +0000

“Please don’t go there.. I have seen your name on plenty of Viking threads.
Also, I agree the Vikings have played nothing but crappy teams so far (and that most certainly includes us), but I would only call one of their wins luck, and even that is debatable. Do you watch the games at all?”
Yeah that is true. I do go and post on the Viking threads. I shouldn’t of said what I said in my earlier post since I do the same.
and no I don’t watch their games but I do look up their stats. Some are good. Some aren’t that good. I do know that against the Browns and Lions, they played pretty bad in the 1st half and were down at halftime. Against the 49ers, Favre wasn’t really much of anything until that last play but I do admit they played pretty well against the Pack. As for this past Sunday, they didn’t play that well because they allowed the Rams to go over 400 total yards. It was turnovers that got them the win.
…I do say some dumb things in my posts and when I read them later, sometimes I wonder why I posted it in the first place. I honestly do think the Vikes could get far this season. However, they won’t go the Super Bowl. They might win a playoff game but that’s it. I also think my Packers could slide in as a wildcard team and possibly even face the Vikes. It would be one hell of a game if there was.

By: Beer Cheese Soup

Beer Cheese Soup — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:42:00 +0000

packers4life says:
It would be great if you and your Viking buddies go troll on some other team’s post.
and oh yeah the Vikings are not as good as you think. Luck is the best defintion I have for their season.
_____________________
Please don’t go there.. I have seen your name on plenty of Viking threads.
Also, I agree the Vikings have played nothing but crappy teams so far (and that most certainly includes us), but I would only call one of their wins luck, and even that is debatable. Do you watch the games at all?
Chickenfoot says: October 12, 2009 2:29 PM
I do believe that the line will be improved, just for the sole fact that it couldn’t be any worse than it has been.
It’s just that as of now, it’s been atrocious. If they even get semi-adequate, it makes Rodgers that much more dangerous.
____________________
Thank you for summing up what I’ve been saying all day. Rodgers led the league in passing while being sacked eight times and pressured easily a dozen more. Now just IMAGINE what he can do if he only gets sacked three or four times, haha…
I don’t think anyone not named Bob is saying we can make a Superbowl run, but to go from the absolute worst line in the league to a mediocre one, with the weapons we have, should be enough to stay competitive within the division.

By: Crazydiamond

Crazydiamond — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:52:29 +0000

Did Footballrulz call Favre and Longwell has beens? They are outperforming Rodgers and Crosby are they not?

By: JimmySmlth

JimmySmlth — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:26:13 +0000

Bob Nelson and I are laughing at these posts while snuggling in bed together…

By: jruphoff

jruphoff — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:23:02 +0000

why is everyone so mean!!!
anyway… i do not think they they would trade Thomas for Kampman straight up… not do i think it will actually happen. I would just like to see them make a move for him.
The browns have nothing to play for at this point and if they could get Kampman and a draft pick (or clifton) for one guy they might go for it.
I know thompson will not part with the picks, which is why this wouldnt happen, but a fan can dream right?

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:50:03 +0000

Packers for life:
Nah non of your cheesehead brethren troll vikings sites either…..yourself included you Jagoff!!
Luck, schmuck!
Thanks for defining yourself as an idiot.
Mantra of a typical Packer fan: When the Pack wins it’s all skill, when the Vikes do thier lucky.
Pathetic.
I’m sure you are one of the Packer fans that according to your reasoning, the Pack has never lost EVER.
1- injuries
2- refs screwed us
3 – other team is lucky
4- a car was coming
5- we were on gool when that play occured
Luck?
Browns won by 14
lions won by 14
49ers—-favre luck
Packers 30-14 til garbage time
rams won by 28
Yeah, that’s luck alright.
You are racing to the top of Asshat mountain as we speak!!

By: packers4life

packers4life — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:23:57 +0000

“The way Ted Thompson has treated him, I would have signed with another team.”
Yes let’s keep on finding a way to make this look like all Ted Thompson’s fault even though he did nothing wrong to Tauscher.
Dude look up the facts. He had offseason knee surgery and he was not fully healthy at the time and they weren’t going to take any chances on him since he has not completed his 10 month deadline of which was the time he was going to be fully healthy. At the time which was around February, he was just about a month or two off surgery.
So next time look up the facts on what is called the internet instead of making it look like it was Thompson’s fault just because he mistreated your man-crush who you can’t get enough of.

By: packers4life

packers4life — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:13:58 +0000

“Even before Clifton went down the O-line was garbage so why is it suddenly going to be drastically better with him ?”
Actually they weren’t. Yes they allowed Adewale Ogunleye to get 3 sacks week one but that was nearly all Allen Barbre. Clifton did struggle against Odom but it got worse when he went down.
and I know Tauscher is coming off knee surgery but he had it nearly 10 months ago. He is fully healthy and I am really glad we brought him back.

By: packers4life

packers4life — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:11:13 +0000

“It would be great if we could all just quit responding to Bob Nelson.”
It would be great if you and your Viking buddies go troll on some other team’s post. I can’t come and read about my favorite team without coming up to one of your stupid, moronic posts thinking you are so tough.
and oh yeah the Vikings are not as good as you think. Luck is the best defintion I have for their season.

By: DCViking

DCViking — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:07:17 +0000

Assuming Clifton is completely healthy, the Pack line should get better. I know he did a great job against Allen in Green Bay, but I think JA got the better of him in Minnesota last year.
Pack should get to fatten its record for the next two weeks. I’d like really like to see Minnie one out of the next two.
I sincerely the Pack keeps using Kampman the way they are now…loved watching him drop into coverage last Monday night.

By: Canned Heat

Canned Heat — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:59:03 +0000

This will be a slight improvement…but not much. What they need is to get the run blocking scheme changed or fixed to allow Grant and the no names a chance to eat some clock up with ball control. Between an inept strategy, bad personnel decisions, and injury, the defense of GB is suspect enough and then having to be on the field 40 minutes a game isn’t helping.
I like the over confidence of the queens fans too. As if you haven’t watched one Brett Lorenzo Favre self-destruct on his own over the last 5 years, you need to call up the Karma-Gods? this has all the smell of the same bandwagon jumping, trash talking, “locked-up Lombardi Trophy” crap that we listened to when Culpepper was throwing to Moss and Carter…when they were led by: “The walking dunce cap.” This year, they won’t get far enough to see the missed field goal.

By: purpleguy

purpleguy — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:32:39 +0000

Tauscher and Clifton coming back should be an improvement, but mostly because pretty much any warm body would be an improvement from the existing O-line. However, the combination of age and injury to both guys will really limit their effectiveness to the point that the O-line is still going to be below average.
I’ve seen some of it from posters above, but this steaming pile of O-line dung has plopped directly out of the rear-end of Ted Thompson. The guy makes no realistic effort to improve the O-line in the off-season till it’s too late, leaves Tauscher hanging all off-season, and then stiffs him over the bye week to avoid paying another week’s salary. What, has he been going to the Red McCombs school of tightwaddedness? Pack fans should be jumping all over the guy, as Rodgers and the team deserve better.

By: Chickenfoot

Chickenfoot — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:16:54 +0000

Adam:
Really?! That’s your comeback?
Where were you all week? The tears finally dry up?
Freaking blowhard windbag leading up to the game, and then you can’t show up for a WEEK afterwards?
Honestly, I figured you to be that type of fan. I really did.
You are one of the masses that thinks your team is Superbowl bound every year, and are dumbfounded when they suck.
What are you going to do when the Lions beat the Packers this week? Will you be gone a month then?
You are a horrible fan and an even worse poster.
I bet you suck at life as bad as you suck at posting on PFT don’t you?
I’m willing to bet thats the case.

By: karpsta

karpsta — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:13:44 +0000

Good ol Cheapskate Thompson, throwing around nickels like man hole covers again. That must have drove him nuts having to spend money on a player he didn’t draft. The fact that he waited till after the buy to save a couple bucks proves he less interested in making the team better, then meeting the bottom line.
I really wish Tauscher would have told him to F off and signed with someone else.

By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen

Adam-Chris Scheftersen — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:04:34 +0000

Plankshelmet says:
October 12, 2009 2:48 PM
OMG THEY DID IT !!!!! They found the missing piece of the puzzle. Now the Packers will go 14-2 and roll onto a SUPER BOWL VICTORY !! HOOOORAY!! LMAO.
—————————
Yeah, that sums up what everyone’s saying. Nice job.