Comments on: Restraining order granted against Suggs

By: FumbleNuts

FumbleNuts — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:02:58 +0000

Of course she doesn’t want full custody of the kids. She wants to go shopping and spend some of that $35,000 a month. For alot of folks, 35K is a yearly wage.
The child support laws in America are out of control.

By: bluestree

bluestree — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:12:13 +0000

“The woman has since sued Suggs for $70 million, but has reportedly given up her desire to have custody of the couple’s children.”
_______________________
That says it all.

By: FireJerryJones

FireJerryJones — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:30:47 +0000

Roid rage.

By: MSWRavens

MSWRavens — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:22:15 +0000

From local Bmore news this morning – the woman was a stripper that Suggs met at a strip club. Gee, why am I not surprised. O yeah, and she no longer dances and has become a “full time homemaker.” No police report. No calls to 911. Just filed a protective order and a $70M lawsuit!
Suggs consented to the protective order because he “doesn’t want be anywhere near her.” And the fact the she CONSENTED to Suggs having custody says a TON about whether he was physically abusive and whether he presents a threat to her or the kids.
I think I’ve heard all I need to know! And yes, Kanye’s “Golddigger” comes to mind… At $35K/month I hope Ms. Thing enjoys the retirement that we are all paying for, in a way…

By: Krow

Krow — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:37:09 +0000

Too funny… these fools deserve what happens to them. They ask for it… beg for it. Tough… no sympathy at all for Suggs. Next time keep away from the lowlife.

By: PatricktheDookie

PatricktheDookie — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:15:50 +0000

I’d let Suggs sit on me for $70 million.

By: Nevisyakker

Nevisyakker — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:54:39 +0000

“but has reportedly given up her desire to have custody of the couple’s children.”
This would seem pretty obvious that what is intended here is her agreement to not pursue sole custody and accept “shared custody” as is mentioned. $35 G seems like it ought to keep the kids in play dough, but in most states it is factored by what is considered a “reasonable” percentage of the highest earning spouse’s income. When Suggs the thug quits playing and his income goes to zilch they will have to reconsider the amount.

By: Boyz_R_Back

Boyz_R_Back — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:47:15 +0000

Oops.. Glanced over the story. Didn’t read the 2 kids part. Need to stop drinking and reading – Can be dangerous….

By: Gautam

Gautam — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:41:00 +0000

210k per year for one kid … wtf

By: maskedman

maskedman — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:21:58 +0000

Maybe it was the way it was written, but the following slightly confuses me…
“The woman has since sued Suggs for $70 million, but has reportedly given up her desire to have custody of the couple’s children.
The hearing Friday negotiated the former couple’s breakup. They will share custody and Suggs will pay $35,000 a month in child support.”
If she “reportedly” gave up custody, why is she getting child support?

By: Hosstyle In Tampa

Hosstyle In Tampa — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:15:10 +0000

Lucky gal, some guys will never help with the laundry…

By: JoeStrummerLives

JoeStrummerLives — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:57:32 +0000

Boyz_R_Back:
Divide your answer by two, bro! You almost had it!

By: steveinohio

steveinohio — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:13:34 +0000

I don’t know how many of those “never shake a baby” ads I’ve seen…countless. Not one “never bleach a baby.” Suggs should sue the Public Service Announcement guys.

By: Bill Cowher's Chin

Bill Cowher's Chin — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:10:56 +0000

Boyz_R_Back says:
December 11, 2009 8:57 PM
Nice math Bob Nelson…. $35K per month * 12 months = $420k per year
____________________________________
Not to pick sides here, but Bob Nelson did say: $210,000 per child, per year. So 2 children, at $210,000 per child, is $420,000. You take $420,000, and divide it by 2, and you get the total per child, of $210,000

By: kevo126

kevo126 — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:10:08 +0000

judging by the fact that the mom doesnt want custody of her children makes me think she is just another gold digger. or she is just the worst mother ever.

By: Yung Lil Fly

Yung Lil Fly — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:07:02 +0000

Nice Math Boyz_R_Back… $35k*12 months / TWO CHILDREN = 210/kid

By: Boyz_R_Back

Boyz_R_Back — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:57:55 +0000

Nice math Bob Nelson…. $35K per month * 12 months = $420k per year

By: slipkid

slipkid — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:48:50 +0000

“stop me before i bleach again!”

By: LiveNBreatheFootball

LiveNBreatheFootball — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:48:28 +0000

Okay, fact check. If he agreed, that makes it a consent order. That means there were NO findings of abuse. All he did was agree to stay away from her.
Seriously guys, Maryland law is online. You can find this stuff fairly easily.

By: Bigbluefan

Bigbluefan — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:44:43 +0000

$35,000 in child support wtf
How many kids how old WTF
For that kind of money she had better been one hell of a lay
I think Kyana West made a song about this what a scam $35,000.00

By: Bob Nelson

Bob Nelson — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:43:02 +0000

$35,000 an month = $210,000/child per year x years until age 18.
I don’t want to sound callous but wouldn’t a hitman be cheaper?

By: emoser

emoser — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:41:56 +0000

thug

By: chapnasty

chapnasty — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:40:00 +0000

I was going to make a bleach and white woman remark but that isn’t appropriate……