Skip to content

Packers eliminate Bears, march toward playoffs

The Green Bay Packers cruised to an early lead and looked set to dominate the Chicago Bears today at Soldier Field.

As it turned out, the Packers actually trailed heading into the fourth quarter and had to come from behind to earn a hard-fought 21-14 win.

Packers running back Ryan Grant ran for a 62-yard touchdown less than two minutes into the first quarter, and he also scored a one-yard touchdown in the fourth quarter that gave the Packers the lead for good. Overall, Grant carried 20 times for 137 yards and was the Packers’ best offensive player on a day when their passing attack was held largely in check.

Bears quarterback Jay Cutler had two touchdown passes and at times looked like he was poised to lead Chicago to an upset over its division rival. But he also threw two interceptions, giving him a league-leading 22 on the year, and the second one set up the Packers’ winning touchdown. The Bears, at 5-8, are now mathematically eliminated from playoff contention.

The Packers, on the other hand, improved to 9-4 and are leading the pack in the NFC wild card hunt. Green Bay can’t expect to catch Minnesota in the NFC North, but the Packers are likely to be a playoff team — and they’ll be a tough team to beat in January.

Permalink 115 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Chicago Bears, Green Bay Packers, Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
115 Responses to “Packers eliminate Bears, march toward playoffs”
  1. PervyHarvin says: Dec 13, 2009 5:15 PM

    Good game Packers, I dream that we meet again. So does Favre,Allen and Percy!

  2. last starfighter says: Dec 13, 2009 5:15 PM

    Good teams find ways to win ugly on the road against rivals. The Steelers couldn’t get it done against the Browns when it mattered.

  3. Emoney says: Dec 13, 2009 5:17 PM

    No matter how shitty Chicago is, they always seem to bring their A game against the Pack. I won’t lie…I was slightly worried there for a minute when they took the lead.
    Good game Chicago. Unfortunately, your QB needs to learn how to throw to his own team and not the opposition.

  4. GBP says: Dec 13, 2009 5:17 PM

    Another DPOY type game for Woodson!!!

  5. HoosierDaddy says: Dec 13, 2009 5:19 PM

    Damn right they will be tough to be in January…unlike the Cowgirls we can finish!!!!

  6. MrHumble says: Dec 13, 2009 5:21 PM

    Michael David Smith…….nice opinion you have but I doubt if it is shared my many outside of yourself and wisconsin. Packers will more than likely make the playoffs, as will many other 2nd and 3rd tier teams but as you give them credit for their “wins”, let’s not be too quick to remember who they have lost too either. Against division leading teams the packers lost to the bengals and vikes twice (rather convincingly too i mite add) and also lost to the likes of the tampa bay bucs. I don’t see the Packers being able to beat the Eagles, Saints, Cowboys (away from home), Vikes or Arizona.

  7. Akshun says: Dec 13, 2009 5:21 PM

    Cutler sucks..

  8. Bones22 says: Dec 13, 2009 5:23 PM

    So what winning teams have the Packers beat? Lets name the ones they have beaten Rams, Browns, Lions twice, Bears twice, Ravens, 49ers and the only semi good team the Cowboys. I think the announcers are geeting ahead of themselves. Their luck will run out. I hope the Steelers punish Rodgers next week.

  9. CYGNUS X-1 says: Dec 13, 2009 5:36 PM

    blame the loss on cutler all you want but the fact is once again only ron turner would call a running play on 3rd. and 1 early in the 3rd.quarter with the packers having 8 guys on the line. the bears had momentum on thier side and were moving but no we have to run it up the middle once again to be stuffed.please for the love of god get rid of him before the season ends then get rid of the rest of them after.I am sick of reading how overrated cutler was and he always sucked.realy?then why all the outrage when he was traded?fact is you never heard anything negative about him until he was traded.thanks to the incompentant coaching staff he is just like all the other qb’s they had.oh yea one other thing the nfc north sucks and that’s the only reason the vikings and packers are any good.hey if it was that was the case when the bears were good and winning then it’s that way it is now as far as I am concerned.can’t wait for the viqueens and lord farve to choke in the playoffs.GO SAINTS!!!

  10. MNFANINAZ says: Dec 13, 2009 5:42 PM

    Vikes eliminated Packers back in November.

  11. OmegaXxXNFL says: Dec 13, 2009 5:42 PM

    Packers Vs Queens round III queen fans worst nightmare! Bank on it…

  12. Bones22 says: Dec 13, 2009 5:50 PM

    I think the Packer fans are some of the biggest douche bags of all time. They can’t admit that their team has beaten no good teams. They

  13. wrath4771 says: Dec 13, 2009 5:55 PM

    Like I said before, the Packers will make the playoffs but will be undone by their numerous penalties and Mason Crosby. Really the only two bad losses I’ve seen from the Packers are the first game against Minnesota and the Tampa Bay game. There’s nothing wrong with losing to Cincy this year and Minnesota let Green Bay back into the second game. Of the remaining games, Arizona is by far the toughest. Pittsburgh a few weeks ago I would have said was a likely loss, but now that’s a winnable game. I’m guessing the Packers end up 11-5. Even 10-6 and the Packers should be happy – it really is a 10-6 team.

  14. 1963 says: Dec 13, 2009 5:55 PM

    All you need to do is get in the playoffs and anything can happen. Look at the Giants in 2007, 3 road wins and then a Super Bowl win against an”unbeatable” Patriots. Pack is winning and that’s all that matters!!!!

  15. MNFANINAZ says: Dec 13, 2009 5:57 PM

    Omega,
    We’ll kill you in the Dome, AGAIN.
    Bring it, you fat f*cks.

  16. mike says: Dec 13, 2009 5:58 PM

    At least they best the 49ers and ravens by more then a last second play.

  17. DocBG says: Dec 13, 2009 6:01 PM

    # OmegaXxXNFL says: December 13, 2009 5:42 PM
    Packers Vs Queens round III queen fans worst nightmare! Bank on it…
    ——————————————————
    yeah, the first 2 kept me up the night before worrying about how the vikes were going to handle you children……
    as doubtful as it is that the pack will even make the playoffs, let alone play the vikes again, there is NO concern amongst ANYone in MN about beating the pack again. we’ve whipped you before in the playoffs, and will have no problems doing it again.
    Bob nelson* stat of the week: The vikings are undefeated against the packers in the playoffs.
    *all bob nelson stats are completely meaningless, and usually a few decades out of relevency

  18. cheddar is beddar says: Dec 13, 2009 6:02 PM

    What is the point you are trying to make Bones? The “your team hasn’t beaten anyone good” claim is the most redudant statement an opposing fan can make.

  19. jeremiah says: Dec 13, 2009 6:08 PM

    bones you are a moron. you can’t even finsh a sentence.

  20. smokesome says: Dec 13, 2009 6:18 PM

    “I think the Packer fans are some of the biggest douche bags of all time. They can’t admit that their team has beaten no good teams.”
    assuming you are a fan of another nfc north team, your argument has no validity because we all play virtually the exact same schedule. you can only play the games that are given to you. if you are a good team, you will win the games you are “supposed” to win. the packers have had many games against less quality teams, but they have won almost all of them. they have also mostly lost to quality opponents (bengals and vikings.) the bears are terrible and can’t beat anyone. the vikings have beat the packers and bengals. so vikings fans can either admit the packers are a good team or they can accept the fact they have only beaten one quality opponent.
    one thing i know packers and vikings fans can both agree on, the bears still suck!

  21. Biff Henderson says: Dec 13, 2009 6:32 PM

    Chokler gift-wrapped the game. The only reason it wasn’t a total Pickfest is that Woodson was off his game a little bit, missing on 2 easy picks.
    No matter how you spin it-
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2430/3626497235_11a64e4a40_b.jpg
    Pack isn’t ready for the big show, and I would be surprised if they went deep in the playoffs, but at least my team gives me pleasure when I watch them play as of late

  22. Bob Nelson says: Dec 13, 2009 6:36 PM

    This Packer team is one that is getting better as the season progresses.
    They are one of if not the toughest team in the NFL right now.
    Their only fault is coasting after they build the large leads.
    They hold the head to head win tiebreker over the Cowboys and have a better Conference record than the Giants.
    We will see if the NFC East teams can keep the Packers pace.

  23. PolegoJim says: Dec 13, 2009 6:46 PM

    Awesome game for Jay Cutler. Two more INT’s to add to his NFL history record.
    Throw it late, throw it behind, throw it into multiple DB coverage. Ignore those linemens hands, you can throw through them!!!
    Way to go Jay!!!

  24. cheddar is beddar says: Dec 13, 2009 6:51 PM

    MNFAN,
    If you are going to retort with ridiculous insults like “Bring it, you fat f*cks,”
    quit being a pussy and spell it out if you are so tough and mighty.

  25. last starfighter says: Dec 13, 2009 6:57 PM

    I’m going to say right now that the bears will beat the vikings at soldier field.

  26. last starfighter says: Dec 13, 2009 6:59 PM

    How cool would it be to see the pack knock favre out of the playoffs

  27. MkePackFan says: Dec 13, 2009 7:00 PM

    I don’t get the people that say “the Packers haven’t beaten anyone good” statements.
    Assuming these comments are coming from Viking fans, the Packers have almost a mirror schedule of the Vikings.
    Yes, we lost 2x to the Vikes, the Bengals, and the Bucs, but we have beaten the same teams you have and will play the Steelers & Cardinals in the coming weeks.
    So Viking fans either need to admit the only quality team they’ve beaten is the Bengals then or admit that their two GB wins are against a “quality” team and quit saying that GB hasn’t beaten anybody.
    Course, their whole argument can be blown up if the Packers win out their remaining games, but of course, come the last week of the season, they’ll just say the Cardinals weren’t playing any of their starters.
    Guess they can have it both ways in MN.

  28. MkePackFan says: Dec 13, 2009 7:04 PM

    As far as the GB v Bears game…it was a divisional win. Not very pretty but the Bears play tough against the Packers.
    We need to stop settling for FGs in the 1st half and convert them to TDs…we also need to stop taking the foot off the gas in the 3rd quarter.
    Lastly, we need to stop putting Mason Crosby in for kicks longer than 35 yards. I have no confidence left in him and it’s time to start bringing in players for tryouts (not to actually sign but to at least apply pressure to Mason) and bring in a serious contender to replace him in the offseason so we either get a better kicker or to get Mason’s head right.
    Another nice game by Chuck…almost had 2 INTs but made some key tackles…good game by Tramon – 100% PI free!

  29. packers4life says: Dec 13, 2009 7:24 PM

    You Viking fans are some of the biggest idiots on this site. Just because your team beat us twice doesn’t mean they will do it again in the playoffs. Remember 2004? When the Packers swept the Vikings and then losing to them in the playoffs? Yeah have any of you ever tried to think about that? That has a chance of happening again this season except it will be the other way around.
    Goodness you Viking fans need to learn how to think before you post. But don’t try too hard, you don’t want to hurt yourselves.

  30. Majik Man says: Dec 13, 2009 7:26 PM

    # OmegaXxXNFL says: December 13, 2009 5:42 PM
    Packers Vs Queens round III queen fans worst nightmare! Bank on it.
    ____________________
    With Favre’s 7 TD’s, 500+ yards, 0 sacks, 0 picks in 2 games, I’m sure Favre is losing lots of sleep worrying about another game against Green Bay. And 2 convincing wins in 2 games against the mighty Pack, I don’t think anyone who plays for or follows the Vikes is too concerned either.

  31. Calistin says: Dec 13, 2009 7:33 PM

    Gotta love all the Vikings fans spewing the hate on a Packers thread after a win. If you weren’t worried you wouldn’t be here. Must not be too much to do aside from the Sunday games as most of you tools post 3-4 times on threads that don’t even concern your team. What are you gonna do after you go one and done again? Goofer Hockey? ROFL.

  32. GBPackers says: Dec 13, 2009 7:40 PM

    CUT CROSBY!! Man, his head has got to be messed up. If it ever comes down to a last second field goal (see Minnesota game last year), he will most definately choke!

  33. badfish69 says: Dec 13, 2009 7:49 PM

    last starfighter says: December 13, 2009 6:59 PM
    How cool would it be to see the pack knock favre out of the playoffs
    We need to stop making it about Brett Favre. You know why the Packers played the way they did against the Vikings? Because McCarthy made it about Favre and called completely different games than he did against everyone else. If they do play again he and the rest of the team needs to forget that Favre ever played here and call what has worked for them all year. Then and only then will they have a chance to knock them off.

  34. zangy says: Dec 13, 2009 8:15 PM

    I agree about bringing in some kickers for tryouts. Crosby has been on the steady decline since his rookie year and it is at the point in the season where some tires need to be kicked.

  35. Bob Loblaw says: Dec 13, 2009 8:22 PM

    OmegaXxXNFL says: “Packers Vs Queens round III queen fans worst nightmare! Bank on it…”
    MkePackFan says: “So Viking fans either need to admit the only quality team they’ve beaten is the Bengals then or admit that their two GB wins are against a “quality” team and quit saying that GB hasn’t beaten anybody.”
    *********
    I’ll respond to both statements. Yes the Packers are a good team. Two quality wins for the Vikings. But as a Viking fan, playing the Packers a third time would be a benefit to the Vikings.
    First it means the Packers would have gone on the road and knocked off a dangerous and playoff tested Cardinals or Eagles team in the wild card round.
    Plus the Vikings have already won this matchup twice. The cliche of “it hard to beat the same team three times in the same season” is proven to be false. The team that won the first two games wins the third one about 65% of the time (the Steelers did it last year vs. the Ravens).
    When it all boils down, the better team wins the majority of the time. As I said, the Packers are a good team. I just think — and the first two games and overall records have proven — that the Vikings are the better team.

  36. Majik Man says: Dec 13, 2009 8:24 PM

    # Calistin says: December 13, 2009 7:33 PM
    Gotta love all the Vikings fans spewing the hate on a Packers thread after a win. If you weren’t worried you wouldn’t be here. Must not be too much to do aside from the Sunday games as most of you tools post 3-4 times on threads that don’t even concern your team. What are you gonna do after you go one and done again? Goofer Hockey? ROFL.
    __________________
    Why don’t you hop over to the Vikings clinch thread, and see how this goes both ways. And I’m positive I’ve seen you spewing your nonsense on many Vikings threads.

  37. jasonvah says: Dec 13, 2009 8:32 PM

    believe me as a diehard shareholder of the greatest team in the world all I want for christmas is one more crack at the douche favre in the playoffs

  38. bluestree says: Dec 13, 2009 9:16 PM

    A win is a win. I was waiting for Green Bay to give up a big kick return, they seem to do that when they’re letting an inferior team hang around. Mason Crosby, it’s no longer a trend, it’s a problem. Ryan Grant is begging to be ridden into January. He’s a key to beating Pittsburgh. Guess Urlacher was right about Forte. Woodson took him down with an arm tackle, and he wasn’t the only one. Atari Bigby made plays. Cutler’s rookie receivers are killing him, and the system isn’t helping. Cutler’s getting a bit of a bad rap. A.J. Hawk is playing some ball. Big challenge for the Pack next week with the Steelers coming off the mini-bye.

  39. packers4life says: Dec 13, 2009 10:25 PM

    “With Favre’s 7 TD’s, 500+ yards, 0 sacks, 0 picks in 2 games, I’m sure Favre is losing lots of sleep worrying about another game against Green Bay. And 2 convincing wins in 2 games against the mighty Pack, I don’t think anyone who plays for or follows the Vikes is too concerned either.”
    Rodgers threw for 5 touchdowns and 671 yards against that weak Vikings’ pass defense.
    If you look up the word “bandwagoner” in the dictionary Majik Man, your name will appear right away. It’s clearly obvious that you are nothing but an unintelligent, bitter buffoon that is upset because the Packers were mean to your little Bretty. And may I ask who gave you access to your mom’s computer? You better get off before you make her mad, buddy boy.

  40. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 13, 2009 10:29 PM

    At least now we’re guaranteed a winning record. Couldn’t be happier about that.
    One, maybe two more wins and we more than likely get the wildcard. I don’t think Pittsburgh’s much of a threat anymore, neither is Seattle after their blowout earlier, so I like our chances. I was ready to write off the season after the Vikings and Bucs disasters, but the team bounced back and made some noise.
    If Crosby should go, it shouldn’t be until after Barbie, Bush, and Harrell are long gone. He’s inconsistent, but he’s not absolutely terrible. Plus, replace him with who?? There aren’t a lot of quality kickers available in FA, and even Billy Cundiff has a job these days, Crosby is WAY better than him.
    It’s also officially time to let the Favre thing go. IF (and it’s a long shot) we meet them in the playoffs, he’s only one man on the team. Plus, anyone who doesn’t think we’re better off with Rodgers isn’t much of a Pack fan. It would sure be nice to have Longwell though!!!

  41. MNFANINAZ says: Dec 13, 2009 10:31 PM

    Vikes also have this on their side:
    Vikings undefeated against the Packers in the playoffs.

  42. Majik Man says: Dec 13, 2009 11:06 PM

    packers4life says: December 13, 2009 10:25 PM
    Rodgers threw for 5 touchdowns and 671 yards against that weak Vikings’ pass defense.
    __________________
    Funny how you left out the 2 fumbles, 1 interception, 14 sacks, and 2 losses.
    If you look up the word imbecile in the dictionary… Oh wait, who am I kidding, we all know you wouldn’t be able to find the word imbecile in the dictionary.
    It’s pretty obvious you aren’t able to form your own opinions and just blindly follow, without ever questioning when things are done poorly, remaining content with mediocrity, I’m guessing within all aspects of your life. This is why you work in some dead end factory job, making $11 an hour doing the same thing every day for 30 years, because you don’t have the intellect or the ambition to do better.
    And for your information, I’m not on my mother’s computer tonight. I’m using your mother’s computer, just like I do every time I sleep over.

  43. badfish69 says: Dec 14, 2009 12:13 AM

    Beer Cheese Soup says: December 13, 2009 10:29 PM
    If Crosby should go, it shouldn’t be until after Barbie, Bush, and Harrell are long gone. He’s inconsistent, but he’s not absolutely terrible. Plus, replace him with who?? There aren’t a lot of quality kickers available in FA, and even Billy Cundiff has a job these days, Crosby is WAY better than him.
    ————————————————–
    No he has been terrible. He has missed kicks in the last three games. Today he misses one in the 4th that would have put them up two scores. You may get away with that against the Bears, but that will get you beat against any of those teams in the playoffs. they need to at least get someone in for week and push him. If he wins out at the end he keeps his job, if not he’s gone. This is where GM’s in this league make their money. We cannot go into the playoffs with Crosby performing the way he has.
    John Carney is available. He may be older than dirt, but he could have made that kick today.

  44. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 12:18 AM

    Majik Man calls someone else pathetic. Priceless. Tell us, Majik. Are you going to be a Seahawks fans next year if Holmgren goes back and talks Favre out of re-re-retiring?

  45. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 12:19 AM

    MNFANINAZ says:
    December 13, 2009 10:31 PM
    Vikes also have this on their side:
    Vikings undefeated against the Packers in the playoffs.
    ——————————-
    I’m sure that one win will set them up nicely.

  46. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 12:21 AM

    Beer Cheese Soup says:
    December 13, 2009 10:29 PM
    At least now we’re guaranteed a winning record. Couldn’t be happier about that.
    One, maybe two more wins and we more than likely get the wildcard. I don’t think Pittsburgh’s much of a threat anymore, neither is Seattle after their blowout earlier, so I like our chances. I was ready to write off the season after the Vikings and Bucs disasters, but the team bounced back and made some noise.
    ——————————-
    No, you weren’t ready to write off the season. You DID write off the season. You were rooting for them to lose out to get rid of Thompson. Personally, I have no problem with that. But don’t wear out your shoes hopping off and on the bandwagon.

  47. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 12:32 AM

    DocBG says:
    December 13, 2009 6:01 PM
    as doubtful as it is that the pack will even make the playoffs….
    —————————–
    You can’t be this dumb. You don’t realize the Packers are sitting one game ahead of Dallas with the tiebreaker in hand? And now two games ahead of the Giants? Their fate is entirely in their own hands.
    So it’s hardly “doubtful” that they’ll make the playoffs. It’s likely. They haven’t clinched anything like the Vikings did today, but with the NFC East teams all still playing each other in the last few weeks, it’s pretty damn likly that they’ll get in.

  48. MNFANINAZ says: Dec 14, 2009 12:32 AM

    No Packer fan with half a brain wants any more of #4. Besides, the Packers are going to get crushed by Philly or Zona so it will never happen anyway.
    Packer fans are delusional drunken fat pigs.
    Should be fun watching the Steelers take out their season long frustrations out on Rodgers this week. If the Bears could make him look that bad, just imagine what Harrison and the boys will do to him.

  49. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 14, 2009 1:09 AM

    MNFANINAZ says:
    Vikes also have this on their side:
    Vikings undefeated against the Packers in the playoffs.
    ____________________________________
    It was ONE GAME, moron, and it was due to a typical Favre playoff performance. Plus, wouldn’t that constitute the same “bringing up the past” you always accuse us of? You’re a hypocrite, but that’s almost a prerequisite to being a member of your fairweather fanbase..

  50. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 14, 2009 1:12 AM

    MNFANINAZ says:
    (who cares what MNFANINAZ says):
    ____________________________________
    At least you’re not posting lyrics to Starship songs and dedicating them to Brett anymore though. That one gave “Purple Pride” a whole new meaning.
    Maybe there’s hope for you yet. Probably not, but maybe…

  51. packers4life says: Dec 14, 2009 2:01 AM

    “And for your information, I’m not on my mother’s computer tonight. I’m using your mother’s computer, just like I do every time I sleep over.”
    Haha wow. Are you seriously using “your mom” jokes? because those have gotten so old such a long time ago and they are not even funny anymore. And no I did not use a “your mom” joke in my last post either.
    I wonder how proud your hero Don Majkowski would be if he ever read your posts.

  52. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 8:50 AM

    Majik Man says:
    December 13, 2009 7:26 PM
    # OmegaXxXNFL says: December 13, 2009 5:42 PM
    Packers Vs Queens round III queen fans worst nightmare! Bank on it.
    ____________________
    With Favre’s 7 TD’s, 500+ yards, 0 sacks, 0 picks in 2 games, I’m sure Favre is losing lots of sleep worrying about another game against Green Bay. And 2 convincing wins in 2 games against the mighty Pack, I don’t think anyone who plays for or follows the Vikes is too concerned either.
    ——
    Yes the fans are.

  53. MNFANINAZ says: Dec 14, 2009 9:39 AM

    Packer backers,
    I’m sorry your not “in” on the joke, and I’m sorry you have to tune into Viking games to watch the greatest Packer of all time, but hey, that’s the breaks chubby chub chub.

  54. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 9:59 AM

    packers4life says:
    December 13, 2009 10:25 PM
    “With Favre’s 7 TD’s, 500+ yards, 0 sacks, 0 picks in 2 games, I’m sure Favre is losing lots of sleep worrying about another game against Green Bay. And 2 convincing wins in 2 games against the mighty Pack, I don’t think anyone who plays for or follows the Vikes is too concerned either.”
    Rodgers threw for 5 touchdowns and 671 yards against that weak Vikings’ pass defense.
    If you look up the word “bandwagoner” in the dictionary Majik Man, your name will appear right away. It’s clearly obvious that you are nothing but an unintelligent, bitter buffoon that is upset because the Packers were mean to your little Bretty. And may I ask who gave you access to your mom’s computer? You better get off before you make her mad, buddy boy.

  55. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 10:02 AM

    Adam-Chris Scheftersen says:
    December 14, 2009 12:21 AM
    Beer Cheese Soup says:
    December 13, 2009 10:29 PM
    At least now we’re guaranteed a winning record. Couldn’t be happier about that.
    One, maybe two more wins and we more than likely get the wildcard. I don’t think Pittsburgh’s much of a threat anymore, neither is Seattle after their blowout earlier, so I like our chances. I was ready to write off the season after the Vikings and Bucs disasters, but the team bounced back and made some noise.
    ——————————-
    No, you weren’t ready to write off the season. You DID write off the season. You were rooting for them to lose out to get rid of Thompson. Personally, I have no problem with that. But don’t wear out your shoes hopping off and on the bandwagon.
    —-
    Well said Adam with the exception of the rooting to lose. You never root to lose. Ever. Only losers do that. Beer cheese is one. He clearly wrote off the season 100 percent. He posts using emotion before intellect. Complete football idiot. Ted Thompson for life Beer!! get used to it.

  56. jeff says: Dec 14, 2009 10:29 AM

    Super:
    I wonder about you. You are agreeing with someone with the intellect of Shitterson?
    This guy is a know feces mailer!!
    Seriously, he craps in a box and mails it to people.
    That is frightening. The only good thing is, that he eats the corn out of it before it gets sent out.

  57. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 10:48 AM

    The mailing of poop really needs to be questioned but he made a good football point there.

  58. jeff says: Dec 14, 2009 11:12 AM

    How would you know if it was a good point or not?
    Are you, or are you not, a know nothing about football?
    Shitterson doesn’t even wipe his ass, he typed somewhere on here that toilet paper is for sissies.

  59. jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says: Dec 14, 2009 11:14 AM

    jeff the only one with a passion for turds on here is you. with all your blah blah blah about shit its no wonder you have to masturbate daily. big shit contests and pictures of bronzed poop?? You cant mail poop anyway.

  60. OmegaXxXNFL says: Dec 14, 2009 11:22 AM

    “MNFANINAZ says:
    December 14, 2009 12:32 AM
    No Packer fan with half a brain wants any more of #4. Besides, the Packers are going to get crushed by Philly or Zona so it will never happen anyway.
    Packer fans are delusional drunken fat pigs.”
    So MNFANINAZ, just how fat is your Mom? LOL!

  61. cheddar is beddar says: Dec 14, 2009 11:26 AM

    All you guys sound pathetic. Talk some football.

  62. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 11:26 AM

    jeff says:
    December 14, 2009 11:12 AM
    How would you know if it was a good point or not?
    Are you, or are you not, a know nothing about football?
    Shitterson doesn’t even wipe his ass, he typed somewhere on here that toilet paper is for sissies.
    ——
    Boy that know nothing act has gotten to you too??

  63. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 11:33 AM

    Super and packers4life
    Yes, very well said, indeed. First of all, if you look up the word bandwagoner in the dictionary, you won’t find it, because it’s not a real word. Typical of Packer fans, make stuff up to get a point across. Just ask Ruvell about this, he is the king of it.
    The term you are looking for would be band-wagon fan, or band-wagon jumper. And this term misses me completely, except for in your eyes, of course. To jump on the band-wagon, you jump to a party or team of strength, deserting a weaker one in the process. I stopped rooting for a 13-3 team in order to root for a 4-12 team. And again this year, everyone had the Packers picked to win the North, with the Viking set to struggle for a wild card berth. So once again, not shifting to the apparent front runner, or band-wagon jumping.
    As a matter of fact, the real “bandwagoners” are the vast majority of the Packer fans, who in the course of 13 games have gone from “we’re going to the Super Bowl” to “we suck, fire Ted and McCarthy”, back to “we’re going to kill the Vikings in the playoffs because of Thompson and McCarthy’s greatness.” What a joke.

  64. jeff says: Dec 14, 2009 11:47 AM

    jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says:
    December 14, 2009 11:14 AM
    jeff the only one with a passion for turds on here is you. with all your blah blah blah about shit its no wonder you have to masturbate daily. big shit contests and pictures of bronzed poop?? You cant mail poop anyway.
    =================================
    How would you know if you can mail shit ot not?
    You must have tried before.
    Super is the one with the big turd contest, not me, I just advertise for him.
    Adam shitterson is the one that offered to mail me his poop.
    So what if I jerk off daily, I’m not hurting anyone.
    You actually went to the trouble to make up that stupid screen name? I bet you are Shitterson in disguise.
    Super: no, I didn’t fall for the act, I know you.
    I know you think you know more than anyone else.
    You ego wouldn’t permit you to admit to anyone that you know less than them.

  65. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 11:49 AM

    Majik,
    You knew what was meant and for you to so desperatly to type two paragraphs explaning the definition of bandwagon shows how desperate you are at being right about something for once. Congrats! you got us (and eveyone). A oldclassmate of mine said it best ove the weekend. Following Favre around is like stalking your ex girlfirend. get over it.

  66. Ruvell100 says: Dec 14, 2009 12:25 PM

    On the topic at hand, Jay Cutler is terrible. It’s a rivalry win and the ground game was exactly what we need down the stretch, but this Bear’s team is just not good. Period.
    If we executed better in the red zone and didn’t have our standard third quarter lull, that game would have been a blowout. They better start figuring out how to play at the tempo they start and finish the game with all the way through.
    Back to flipping burgers, and/or factory work in my $9/hour, dead end job that is not up to Majik’s standards.

  67. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 12:27 PM

    In a desperate attempt at making a correct point Majik types two paragraphs denouncing our use of the term band wagon. Congrats Majik!! You got one finally!!

  68. jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says: Dec 14, 2009 12:34 PM

    jeff says:
    December 14, 2009 11:47 AM
    jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says:
    December 14, 2009 11:14 AM
    jeff the only one with a passion for turds on here is you. with all your blah blah blah about shit its no wonder you have to masturbate daily. big shit contests and pictures of bronzed poop?? You cant mail poop anyway.
    =================================
    How would you know if you can mail shit ot not?
    You must have tried before.
    Super is the one with the big turd contest, not me, I just advertise for him.
    Adam shitterson is the one that offered to mail me his poop.
    So what if I jerk off daily, I’m not hurting anyone.
    You actually went to the trouble to make up that stupid screen name? I bet you are Shitterson in disguise.
    Super: no, I didn’t fall for the act, I know you.
    I know you think you know more than anyone else.
    You ego wouldn’t permit you to admit to anyone that you know less than them.
    ——
    Well whoever would promote a turd contest is disgusting and probably has a little dick. So that makes both you and ssuckers idiots.
    I highly doubt Adam offered to mail you poop. That would be disgusting and he would be in the same shitboat you two are in.
    As far as the masturbation goes whatever. My point is you have to jerk off daily probably due to your obsession with poop and feces. What woman would want to sift through all the shit?

  69. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 12:42 PM

    Super,
    Try proofreading next time, quite a bit of rubbish in that last post, hard to make much out of it. Actually, eerily similar to most of your posts in that aspect.
    And following the Thompson led Packers is like continuing to work for a company who fires their top salesman and replaces him with the janitor. Doesn’t make much sense.

  70. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 14, 2009 1:01 PM

    Adam-Chris Scheftersen says:
    No, you weren’t ready to write off the season. You DID write off the season. You were rooting for them to lose out to get rid of Thompson. Personally, I have no problem with that. But don’t wear out your shoes hopping off and on the bandwagon.
    ____________________________________
    You are a complete moron, you know that? Jeff/Ragnar/Chicken is completely right about you. You ARE an asshat.
    If you were to go back and actually READ what I wrote after the Tampa disgrace, you’d see me repeat numerous times that I NEVER root for the Pack to lose. I wouldn’t be a Packers fan at all if I did. I’d just be another Majik.
    I do still want Thompson gone, and, unless we make some noise in the playoffs, I will stand by that. It’s not worth losing however. A true fan ALWAYS wants his team to win.
    Suck says:
    Following Favre around is like stalking your ex girlfirend. get over it.
    ____________________________________
    That may be the most sensible thing you’ve ever posted. For someone who “knows nothing”, that’s impressive work. Keep it up.

  71. Ruvell100 says: Dec 14, 2009 1:16 PM

    If the top salesman was also unreliable and had abused his position one too many times, and the janitor happened to be a top-book writer in his own right, then yes, that is exactly what we root for.
    Majik, will you just answer the one question you’ve been dodging, please. Who are you going to root for when Favre is finally done?

  72. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 1:37 PM

    Majik,
    They are 9-4!!!! You really do not know what you are watching do you son? Jumpig from team to team because of a player is something a child would do. Its pathetic really. Thompson has this team built to be good for a very long time. Youngest team in the NFL and they are 9-4. It is a process. I do not know why I repeat myself to you. It’s like I want you to get it. For the lighbulb to come on. It’s not going to. For you to say Thompson sucks when a team that plays sloppily for a good portion of their games and is 9-4 is lunacy and I am embarrased for myself for thinking you had a chance to catch on. just think if they could actually put 4 quarters together. If you want to bag anyone (why would you winning is winning) bag on McCarthy. He is the one responsible for the play on the field. Green bay is loaded with great talent.

  73. packers4life says: Dec 14, 2009 1:38 PM

    Majik Man,
    If you don’t like the Packers then stop freakin’ posting on every story there is about them.
    Just get the hell over the fact that Thompson kicked Favre’s a$$ to the curb.
    “Packer fans are delusional drunken fat pigs.”
    Says the guy behind the computer screen…..

  74. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 1:39 PM

    You are comparing Aaron Rodgers to a janitor?
    I am embarrased for you

  75. jeff says: Dec 14, 2009 1:43 PM

    jeffisa:
    Adam-Chris Scheftersen says:
    November 17, 2009 5:42 PM
    Chickenfoot says:
    November 17, 2009 10:50 AM
    Awesome post Pervy: But, you are going to get greif for it. Don’t worry i got your back.
    I bet Adam- Ijust took a2 taperedshitterson’s head is spinning like regans in the Exorcist!
    ——————————-
    And what’s with your obsession with tapered shits? Whatever it is, leave me out of it. I’ll let you roll in all the tapered shits you want. Hell, post your address and I’ll mail you some extra.
    ======================
    It’s YOUR obsession with poop. In specific, two-tapered poops. I suppose that’s because you never find anything other than the one-tapered variety when you check out your handiwork.
    I’ve never mailed my poop to anyone, and I don’t expect I ever will. But I stand by my comment. I’d mail some to you.
    ————————————–
    There it is in black and white. He did offer to do it.
    As far as the masturbation aspect, I have a high sex drive.( average length, thicker than most, not small by any means).
    My girlfreind likes hot carls and cleveland steamers.
    I think super needs to get you the rules to Big Turd 2010. you sound like the type of person that would secretly enjoy competing with others to squeeze out the perfect 2 tapered shit.

  76. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 1:45 PM

    Beer Cheese you actually did stop just a c-hair short of saying you wanted them to lose. You called it a “win-win” so if they lost a game your loser mentality fantasy of Thompson being fired would come closer to being reality. Now you look like a fool. What are your reasons now? 9-4 not good enough? Team in good financial shape with plenty of money and capspace to lock up high performing homebred packers? What ARE your reasons now?

  77. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 2:06 PM

    packers4life
    First, I never said that about Packer fans, hard to believe you would misquote somebody. And aren’t you the same guy I see posting all over the Vikings clinch thread?
    Super, weren’t the Packers built to be very good last year? The previous year, they were 13-3, returned almost the entire team, and they went 6-10. 9-4 is pretty good, but they have yet to beat a good team (don’t say the wishy-washy Cowboys). 9 wins is 9 wins, but I think that easy schedule is benefiting them. I know the Vikes have essentially the same schedule, but they win convincingly for the most part. It’s all the Pack can do to beat the Bears, they will be in for a rude awakening in the playoffs when they travel to what looks like a showdown with Philly.
    Ruvell, how did Favre abuse his position? By not being able to decide if he wanted to continue doing what he loved, and the only thing he has known, when he wasn’t sure he could physically do it. Yep, you’re right. When Jordan retired, the Bulls shouldn’t have let him back, they should have traded him to the Clippers to punish him for his indecisiveness. But they didn’t, because they knew Jordan gave them the best chance to win, and they were rewarded with 3 more championships. And it’s very well known that Krause and Jordan didn’t get along, but Krause swallowed his pride and did what was best for the team.
    As for what team I will root for, what does it matter to you? According to you, my opinions don’t mean anything, so why do you care what I think? Maybe I will root for the Colts, out of respect for their beat down of the 1995 Super Bowl Champion Packers, when they were 0-10. Or maybe the Steelers, because they beat the Seahawks in the Super Bowl when Thompson was the GM in Seattle. Why am I still responding to you?

  78. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 14, 2009 2:40 PM

    Suck says:
    Beer Cheese you actually did stop just a c-hair short of saying you wanted them to lose.
    Team in good financial shape with plenty of money and capspace to lock up high performing homebred packers? What ARE your reasons now?
    ____________________________________
    Horseshoes and grenades, man. The point is, I DIDN’T say it, and I won’t have you and Adam misquoting me.
    Once again, the Ted fans point to finances, the only thing he’s been consistently good at. Sadly, I don’t give half a damn about contracts, they STILL don’t give trophies for cap space or roster youth, and that means even less than it does now if we hit an uncapped year anyway.
    I know exactly why you love Ted so much. You’ve stated more than once on here how much you love older men and how attractive you find him. That still doesn’t make him good at his job though, and it isn’t going to make me like him.
    This team needs to win to impress me. By that, I don’t just mean racking up wins in the regular season with the second-easiest schedule in the league. I mean making the postseason, and then actually making a respectable run. Winning playoff games. Winning when it counts.
    If they can do that, I’ll take back everything I’ve ever said about your object of desire. I will not hop on and off of wagons like these other douches however. That’s not who I am.

  79. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 2:41 PM

    Majik,
    Most of the morons on here have wild and crazy opinions. You on the other hand are by far the most factually incorrect poster here. Ill let everyone else find the incorrect “facts” on this lastest dandy. How can one person be factually wrong all the time, corrected by others (many others) and still show his face without a admission of a mistake? Same guy who jumps around teams because of one player i suppose.

  80. jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says: Dec 14, 2009 2:47 PM

    turdjeff u are disgusting. No one wanted or needed to know the size of your genitals. come on. See????? Adam never mailed shit to anyone. Why are you so obsessed with poop? I dont want to participate in your big turd contest. As far as I am concerned you have it all wrapped up. TURD!

  81. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 2:53 PM

    Beer Cheese Soup says:
    December 14, 2009 1:01 PM
    You are a complete moron, you know that? Jeff/Ragnar/Chicken is completely right about you. You ARE an asshat.
    If you were to go back and actually READ what I wrote after the Tampa disgrace, you’d see me repeat numerous times that I NEVER root for the Pack to lose. I wouldn’t be a Packers fan at all if I did. I’d just be another Majik.
    I do still want Thompson gone, and, unless we make some noise in the playoffs, I will stand by that. It’s not worth losing however. A true fan ALWAYS wants his team to win.
    —————————-
    I stand corrected. I can’t find any examples of you actually saying you hope they lose all their games until Thompson’s gone. I could’ve sworn you had posted it.
    Having said that, maybe I misinterpreted the post below–which sounds a lot like someone rooting for their team to lose. I guess instead of being a bandwagon hopper like Majik you were just incredibly wrong.
    =====================
    Beer Cheese Soup says:
    November 9, 2009 12:37 PM
    As painful as that loss was, it’s somehow liberating to be proven right. We’ll keep losing money (and apparently fans) until this horrible situation is FINALLY fixed.
    Some people talk about the 80′s as being the “dark ages” for the Packers. I say we’re much worse now. Infante was nothing special, but he at least knew how to make game-time adjustments. Mandarich was a colossal bust, but he at least SAW the field, unlike Harrell, and could block occasionally too, unlike Barbie. Dickey and Majkowski are certainly not HOF material, but neither one ever led the league in sacks either. Point being, we are on the verge of the worst era in Green Bay HISTORY. We need to act now to fix this.

  82. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 2:53 PM

    Fair enough Beer.

  83. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 2:56 PM

    jeff says:
    December 14, 2009 1:43 PM
    jeffisa:
    Adam-Chris Scheftersen says:
    November 17, 2009 5:42 PM
    Chickenfoot says:
    November 17, 2009 10:50 AM
    Awesome post Pervy: But, you are going to get greif for it. Don’t worry i got your back.
    I bet Adam- Ijust took a2 taperedshitterson’s head is spinning like regans in the Exorcist!
    ——————————-
    And what’s with your obsession with tapered shits? Whatever it is, leave me out of it. I’ll let you roll in all the tapered shits you want. Hell, post your address and I’ll mail you some extra.
    ======================
    It’s YOUR obsession with poop. In specific, two-tapered poops. I suppose that’s because you never find anything other than the one-tapered variety when you check out your handiwork.
    I’ve never mailed my poop to anyone, and I don’t expect I ever will. But I stand by my comment. I’d mail some to you.
    ————————————–
    There it is in black and white. He did offer to do it.
    As far as the masturbation aspect, I have a high sex drive.( average length, thicker than most, not small by any means).
    My girlfreind likes hot carls and cleveland steamers.
    I think super needs to get you the rules to Big Turd 2010. you sound like the type of person that would secretly enjoy competing with others to squeeze out the perfect 2 tapered shit.
    —————————–
    I’ve never in my life pooped in a box or mailed poop to anyone. But Fagnar/chickenshit/Jeff is worthy of it. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Just post your address and I’ll send you a nice moist two-tapered variety.. Just so you know what they look like.
    You ARE infatuated with poop. Half your posts revolve around them.

  84. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 2:59 PM

    Supersuckers says:
    December 14, 2009 2:41 PM
    Majik,
    Most of the morons on here have wild and crazy opinions. You on the other hand are by far the most factually incorrect poster here. Ill let everyone else find the incorrect “facts” on this lastest dandy. How can one person be factually wrong all the time, corrected by others (many others) and still show his face without a admission of a mistake? Same guy who jumps around teams because of one player i suppose.
    ——————————
    Not to defend that douche bag, but I don’t think you can say Majik is “by far” the most factually incorrect poster here. He may be in the ballpark, but there’s plenty of competitors for that title.

  85. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 3:06 PM

    Supersuckers,
    As for incorrect “facts”, if you’re referring to the ’95 Packers remark, or the Thompson led Seahawks remark, those are a reference to Ruvell’s idiocy. Go check out the Olin Kreutz, B.J. Raji thread to see what I mean. It’s a dig at Ruvell, and he knows it.
    Why don’t you go ahead and point out all of my incorrect “facts” in that last post now, as I’m sure no one else will find any, because, well, there aren’t any. And from now on, please speak only when spoken to, it will save you the embarrassment of having no clue what you’re talking about.

  86. Ruvell100 says: Dec 14, 2009 3:15 PM

    Majik-
    I have acknowledged my choronogical mistake regarding the 95-96 Packers losing to the Cowboys and 96-97 team winning the Super Bowl. However, your point that good teams not losing to bad teams, i.e the Bucs is still wrong.
    Here is the link to the Packers loss to the Colts in there ’98 Super Bowl year. Were they a bad team that year? They lost in the SB.
    http://www.nfl.com/teams/schedule?team=GB&season=1997&seasonType=REG
    They were 0-10 when they beat the Packers in 97.
    And you’re right, I don’t really value the opinion of a man who roots for a team who is a historical joke and an archrival simply to follow one man. The only reason I want to know who you will root for after Favre is gone is so I can laugh at you for being so pathetic.

  87. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 3:19 PM

    Ok Majik….here is one
    “they will be in for a rude awakening in the playoffs when they travel to what looks like a showdown with Philly”
    they’d be in Arizona if the season ended today.
    Here is another:
    “By not being able to decide if he wanted to continue doing what he loved, and the only thing he has known, when he wasn’t sure he could physically do it. Yep, you’re right”
    When Favre retired he stated “I know I can play, but I don’t think I want to” He never questioned the physical aspect. Plus you are getting owned by your dumb comment about jaml reynolds and Sherman/Wolf. Then you make youre error worse by offering the “ok fine who do yyou think had more pull the outgoing or the incoming” What a joke.

  88. Supersuckers says: Dec 14, 2009 3:26 PM

    I highly recommend watching the video with that link. Adam, if you truly said toilet paper is overrated you have got to get yourself one of those.

  89. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 3:42 PM

    Adam
    Please explain to me how going from rooting for a 13-3 team to a 4-12 team is bandwagon jumping. To most normal, competent people, it would appear to be the exact opposite of bandwagon jumping.

  90. Ruvell100 says: Dec 14, 2009 4:12 PM

    Majik-
    You were a Packer fan your whole life and now you are a Viking fan because of Brett Favre. You are not a bandwagon jumper. You are Brett Favre apologist/enthusiast to the ultimate extreme. That has to be a medical condition for a grown man to owe his undying loyalty to a quarterback you’ve met once in your life. I’m sure Brett remembers you well and send you a X-Mas card.
    Comparing MJ to Favre is so laughable it doesn’t need explanation.

  91. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 4:25 PM

    How is comparing Favre to MJ laughable. Both are 2 of the best ever to play their sport and each holds mulitple records and MVP awards. Both retired, and came back, retired again, and came back again. And both athletes famously disliked their GM’s. No similarities at all, right.
    Here’s another Favre, MJ comparison.
    http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/10325372/It%27s-the-Truth:-Favre%27s-proving-Thompson-wrong
    And I’m not a Vikes fan just because of Favre, Ted Thompson’s ego and ignorance have a lot to do with it as well.

  92. jeff says: Dec 14, 2009 4:34 PM

    Adam:
    Have you ever had any one fart on your tounge?
    Depending on how long it goes, it feels like a caterpillar walking across it.
    You’ve hear of earning your red wings, right?
    Well I’m a step ahead of eveyone, I’ve earned my brown wings!!
    For the 3rd time now, you don’t need to mail me poop.
    If you got some feces pieces, I may be interested …..

  93. Beer Cheese Soup says: Dec 14, 2009 4:35 PM

    Adam-Chris Scheftersen says:
    I stand corrected. I can’t find any examples of you actually saying you hope they lose all their games until Thompson’s gone. I could’ve sworn you had posted it…
    …I guess instead of being a bandwagon hopper like Majik you were just incredibly wrong.
    ____________________________________
    You’re damn right you couldn’t find it. I told you, I never said it. Hilarious that you spent all that time looking through two month-old posts though.
    Yes, I was wrong. This team doesn’t suck, and McCarthy has shown he knows how to make the necessary improvements. I’m happy to be wrong, in fact. Now, if only we can get a playoff win…

  94. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 5:33 PM

    Supersuckers says:
    December 14, 2009 3:26 PM
    I highly recommend watching the video with that link. Adam, if you truly said toilet paper is overrated you have got to get yourself one of those.
    ——————————
    I don’t remember saying that. And if I did say it, it was certainly tongue-in-cheek. I’m sure chickendick won’t find it for himself, though.

  95. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 5:35 PM

    Majik Man says:
    December 14, 2009 3:42 PM
    Adam
    Please explain to me how going from rooting for a 13-3 team to a 4-12 team is bandwagon jumping. To most normal, competent people, it would appear to be the exact opposite of bandwagon jumping.
    ——————————
    Maybe bandwagon jumping is not the correct term. I’m not sure there’s a term for what you do. Nuthugging? That’s better, I guess. What about “bromancing the grayhair”? That’s a pretty accurate description.

  96. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 5:36 PM

    jeff says:
    December 14, 2009 4:34 PM
    Adam:
    Have you ever had any one fart on your tounge?
    Depending on how long it goes, it feels like a caterpillar walking across it.
    You’ve hear of earning your red wings, right?
    Well I’m a step ahead of eveyone, I’ve earned my brown wings!!
    For the 3rd time now, you don’t need to mail me poop.
    If you got some feces pieces, I may be interested …..
    ————————
    No, actually I’ve never heard of any of those things. Of course I’ve heard of 2 girls 1 cup, but I don’t feel the need to see it. But I’m sure it’s bookmarked on your PC.

  97. Ruvell100 says: Dec 14, 2009 5:58 PM

    Well considering there are 5 people on the court at one time, playing offense and defense in basketball, and in football a 45 man roster is in play with almost everyone manning a specific role, I think the difference is pretty large.
    Jordan’s Bulls won 6 championships and always delivered in the playoffs. Favre’s Packers won one, with the number 1 defense and top special teams units, and Favre is known worldwide as a poor playoff performer.
    I also don’t remember Jordan going on Greta Van Susteren calling the Bulls front office and head coach incompetent. The Bulls didn’t have a 40 year season ticket waiting list without Jordan either.

  98. Adam-Chris Scheftersen says: Dec 14, 2009 6:05 PM

    Beer Cheese Soup says:
    December 14, 2009 4:35 PM
    You’re damn right you couldn’t find it. I told you, I never said it. Hilarious that you spent all that time looking through two month-old posts though.
    Yes, I was wrong. This team doesn’t suck, and McCarthy has shown he knows how to make the necessary improvements. I’m happy to be wrong, in fact. Now, if only we can get a playoff win…
    ——————————-
    All that time? I spent 5 minutes looking for it. I have no problem backing up my words with proof–or admitting I’m wrong when I find none. Again, sorry for the accusation.
    Agreed on the adjustments and playoff wins. I wasn’t sure McCarthy had it in him either (on those offensive adjustments). After you play 8 games, go 4-4 and give up an average of almost 5 sacks a game, it should be easy to see that your O-line is incapable of protecting the QB for more than 2-3 seconds. In fact, it would’ve been nice had he realized it… I don’t know, maybe by the bye week.
    Luckily, he identified it in time to turn the season around. Also luckily, Rodgers is good enough to play very efficiently and relatively mistake-free when being pounded and compensating for the most penalized team in football.
    And I think they’d be out of the playoff mix and McCarthy/Thompson might be on their way out the door if Dom Capers hadn’t turned a terrible defensive performance last year into a very good one this year. There’s no doubt part of last year’s problems were due to key defensive injuries. But even if they hadn’t had those injuries, this 2009 defense is head and shoulders above last year.
    Woodson might get defensive MVP, but Dom Capers should be the Packers’ MVP. Look at how the defense played last year and compare it to this year. It’s like night and day.

  99. Majik Man says: Dec 14, 2009 6:41 PM

    Favre’s Packers won one, with the number 1 defense
    __________________
    So they should be guaranteed a championship this year, they have the number one defense, and a QB who is better than Favre according to Packer fans, so I guess it’s just a formality of playing the games then, but the Pack has it locked up. Better clear out some space in the trophy case, Lombardi number 4 is already being shipped.

  100. jeff says: Dec 15, 2009 11:00 AM

    Adam:
    If you don’t have any feces pieces, I know you have some Shittles….mmm taste the asshole!

  101. jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says: Dec 15, 2009 11:14 AM

    See!!!!!! There you are again!!!! What is with your complete obsession with feces??!! Turdwatch2010 has found its winner! Its you!! TURD!

  102. PervyHarvin says: Dec 15, 2009 11:17 AM

    Supersuckers- Looking into my crystal ball,you know the one jeff borrowed me, I see Steelers taking frustration out on the Pack Sunday!! Steelers smash Pack right in the mouth. Want to bet???

  103. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 11:44 AM

    Pervy you give me 3.5 and your on. 50 dollar giftcard to restaurant at winners choice. This way we can both just walk in and collect if we pay by phone.

  104. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 11:45 AM

    By the way Pervy Jeffs crystal ball is below the mendoza line after he suffered another losing prophecy Sunday.

  105. jeff says: Dec 15, 2009 11:59 AM

    Super:
    We agreed that I wouldn’t ne paying on bets I make while unconcious. What does that say about a person that would make a bet with someone in the throes of a Jack Daniels bender? :)
    Also please explain the BT 2010 rules to my ” shadow”, he doesn’t get it. he think its for being the biggest turd, not heaving a havana.
    Come on isa turd farts and shit are fun!
    It isn’t my fault you still call taking a shit #2.
    My big question for the day is, how do blind people know when they are done wiping their ass?
    Do they have to smell the TP?

  106. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 12:13 PM

    Bigturd2010 is a contest that involves shitting, photography, and computer savy so it requires some skill. First, you take a dump. Second, you turn around and look at your turd (pre TP) and decide if you think you might have a turd big enough to be considered the biggest turd of the year. Third, if you think you have a contender you photograph the turd. Fourth, simply email the turd as a attachment to a specified email address and wait until the finalists are announced one week before New Year eve. First place is a 400 dollar toilet seat that is heated, has two motorized spray arms fo cleansing, and blows warm air after the cleansing to dry. It is environmentaly friendly because it eliminates the need for toilet paper. Right up Adam’s alley. (pardon the pun) So if you are interested jeffsturds let me know. Adam too! Anyone for that matter.

  107. PervyHarvin says: Dec 15, 2009 1:00 PM

    Supersucker, let’s not complicate things on an anonymous site by betting cash. Lets just bet what you treasure most…football knowledge. I will prove to have known something that you didn’t know! LOL

  108. jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says: Dec 15, 2009 2:51 PM

    Well super that sure is intriguing but I will pass. Wow. Jeff sure enjoys poop as he is constantly refering to poop when he is not posting idiotic football comments with no facts to back them up.
    Or maybe when he is not “masturbating or getting his red wings” That is just gross.
    Typical Pervy or any idiot Viking fan for that matter. Runs his mouth then backs down when confronted.

  109. jeff says: Dec 15, 2009 3:17 PM

    jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says:
    December 15, 2009 2:51 PM
    Well super that sure is intriguing but I will pass. Wow. Jeff sure enjoys poop as he is constantly refering to poop when he is not posting idiotic football comments with no facts to back them up.
    Or maybe when he is not “masturbating or getting his red wings” That is just gross.
    Typical Pervy or any idiot Viking fan for that matter. Runs his mouth then backs down when confronted.
    ===============================
    Well Adam. at least i don’t have to change my name to do battle with another poster.
    Pathetic attempt bozo.
    Heres a clue for you, stats aren’t facts, they are stats.
    The only stat that matters===Vikes 11-2 Pack 9-4
    I have my brown wings, you get those from licking a girls ass…..you have been with a girl haven’t you?
    I’m masturbating as I type this. I’m typing 1 handed.
    I haven’t ever and I’m sure pervy hasn’t “backed down” from anyone.
    Go back to your old name shitterson, you aren’t fooling anyone.

  110. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 3:42 PM

    Hes Pervy backed down when he asked me if I wanted tobet on the PIT GB game then when I said yes he ran away.

  111. jeff says: Dec 15, 2009 4:10 PM

    He probably knows he wouldn’t get paid off.
    Or thinks that, what is he going to do, hunt someone down he doesn’t know?
    Kinda lame to have to scratch that far down, don’t ya think?

  112. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 4:21 PM

    I give his restaurant my card info and they issue him a gift certificate that he goes and picks up. Pretty simple actually.

  113. Supersuckers says: Dec 15, 2009 4:23 PM

    @ jeff whacks it
    You don’t know what you are missing. You should see 1st prize!!

  114. PervyHarvin says: Dec 15, 2009 4:48 PM

    Supersuckers – You are a friend of jeffs,I’m sure you are a stand up guy. Just don’t want to take your money at Christmas time!! Buy the youngster an I Love Pervy PJ set!LOL

  115. PervyHarvin says: Dec 15, 2009 4:49 PM

    Adam- Backing down is not in my genetic makeup son. You talk like a boy with a paper ass!

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!