http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Sat, 25 May 2013 20:38:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384707 Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:57:34 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384707 Quibstick says:
Interviewing Dungy could also be a superficial attempt to satisfy the Rooney Rule!
____________________________________
What delicious irony that would be..

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384706 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:58:35 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384706 No Rooney Rule is for Front Office now as well.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384705 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:26:20 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384705 The Rooney rule only applies to coaches.
And yeah, LTcrackisgood is correct….please start proof reading your stuff Florio.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384704 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:24:32 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384704 Why would Tony Dungy want to follow Holmgren and inherit the current situation? I just want to know why. Make an argument that would make sense to me.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384703 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:04:54 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384703 Or maybe, since Dungy is one of the smartest football minds today, it was to see if he was interested in turning around a spiraling team?!

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384702 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:04:25 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384702 Or maybe, since Dungy is one of the smartest football minds in football, it was to see if he was interested in turning around a spiraling team?!

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384701 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:03:51 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384701 Cleveland will make the Superbowl before Seattle and the Hawks will continue to sink. Bold move for Leiweke….but will probably be his eventual undoing if this is the direction he decides to take. The Hawks have outsmarted themselves.

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384700 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:57:30 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384700 I’d LOVE to see him in SFran in a front office role,

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384699 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:06:02 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384699 Interviewing Dungy could also be a superficial attempt to satisfy the Rooney Rule!

]]> http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/13/seattles-wide-net-could-hurt-holmgrens-chances/#comment-384698 Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:50:20 +0000 http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69145#comment-384698 “Interviews of folks who currently are employed by NFL teams could start soon”
“interviews of those currently working for other teams will have to wait until the regular season ends”
is it just me or do these both say the same thing in different terms. someone who is “currently employed” by an NFL team is the same as on “currently working for other teams”
aren’t you a lawyer? shouldn’t you be good with words?

]]>