<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals court refuses to grant rehearing in StarCaps case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says:
December 15, 2009 2:43 PM
They need to get the cheaters and suspend them like everyone else. Im sick of this.,
==========================
They are, they just re-indicted Johnny Jolly!
I bet you he pooped his pants!
I thought codeine constipated you?...hmmm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily says:<br />
December 15, 2009 2:43 PM<br />
They need to get the cheaters and suspend them like everyone else. Im sick of this.,<br />
==========================<br />
They are, they just re-indicted Johnny Jolly!<br />
I bet you he pooped his pants!<br />
I thought codeine constipated you?&#8230;hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tompadre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompadre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beer -
In the court of law they may be seen as innocent, but just as you Packer fans have crucified Viking players who turned out to be &quot;innocent&quot;, they still can be deemed guilty in the court of public opinion.  And as I stated &quot;not guilty&quot; does not mean they were found &quot;innocent&quot;!  This would pertain to your absurd comment of &quot;Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!&quot;  Talk about a juvenile playground retort!
I&#039;m not saying &quot;they did it too&quot;.  I&#039;m saying it is incredibly hypocritocal for Packer fans to bash Viking players for their troubles with the law when Green Bay&#039;s had their fair share of the same over the years.  I figured people knew the rest of the &quot;glass house&quot; saying.  Sorry I gave you too much credit.
I live in LA (what hick town are you from again?) and witnessed the small framed, light weight Matthews walk on at USC.  His starting job at USC coincided with his relatively sudden weight and muscle mass gain.  The rumors here were based in the same supposition that followed Barry Bonds for years.
For the longest time I had a tendency to side with you in your tiffs with Supersucker &amp; Adam Scheft, but now I understand their opinions of you.
Don&#039;t you have some fire Ted posters to make?  You know, that guy who has your team primed for a second playoff appearance in the last three years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beer -<br />
In the court of law they may be seen as innocent, but just as you Packer fans have crucified Viking players who turned out to be &#8220;innocent&#8221;, they still can be deemed guilty in the court of public opinion.  And as I stated &#8220;not guilty&#8221; does not mean they were found &#8220;innocent&#8221;!  This would pertain to your absurd comment of &#8220;Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!&#8221;  Talk about a juvenile playground retort!<br />
I&#8217;m not saying &#8220;they did it too&#8221;.  I&#8217;m saying it is incredibly hypocritocal for Packer fans to bash Viking players for their troubles with the law when Green Bay&#8217;s had their fair share of the same over the years.  I figured people knew the rest of the &#8220;glass house&#8221; saying.  Sorry I gave you too much credit.<br />
I live in LA (what hick town are you from again?) and witnessed the small framed, light weight Matthews walk on at USC.  His starting job at USC coincided with his relatively sudden weight and muscle mass gain.  The rumors here were based in the same supposition that followed Barry Bonds for years.<br />
For the longest time I had a tendency to side with you in your tiffs with Supersucker &#038; Adam Scheft, but now I understand their opinions of you.<br />
Don&#8217;t you have some fire Ted posters to make?  You know, that guy who has your team primed for a second playoff appearance in the last three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffisaturdandwhacksoffdaily]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They need to get the cheaters and suspend them like everyone else.   Im sick of this.,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to get the cheaters and suspend them like everyone else.   Im sick of this.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beer Cheese Soup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beer Cheese Soup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tompadre says:
Beer says:
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!
--------------------------------------------------
Just llike in the OJ case, right?
In a court of law they don&#039;t find a defendant &quot;innocent&quot;, they find them &quot;not guilty&quot;. There is a significant difference between the two.
____________________________________
Yes, there is a difference, but &quot;innocent until proven guilty&quot; is still a true principle.
We all have our opinions on OJ. Many of you seem to have similar thoughts on Chmura. However, they are considered innocent until proven guilty, and both men were most certainly NOT proven guilty!
If you feel the need to validate Bob Nelson&#039;s Oxycontin-fueled insane ramblings with the puerile playground retort of &quot;but they did it too!&quot;, by all means do so. All I ask, however, is that you find a Packer player who was actually CONVICTED, so as to have a actual respectable argument. There are several to choose from.
and THEN Tompadre says:
(You GB fans better hope C Matthews is using a diuretic for masking purposes as well)
___________________________________
That&#039;s hilarious. Got any facts to back that accusation up? Of course not. Just &quot;OMG, that fudgie&#039;s played good ans stuff.. he must be on drugs!!!1!&quot;
You redneck idiots have spent so much time not caring about your team, now that they&#039;re doing well you don&#039;t even know what you&#039;re watching. At least it&#039;s good for a laugh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tompadre says:<br />
Beer says:<br />
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Just llike in the OJ case, right?<br />
In a court of law they don&#8217;t find a defendant &#8220;innocent&#8221;, they find them &#8220;not guilty&#8221;. There is a significant difference between the two.<br />
____________________________________<br />
Yes, there is a difference, but &#8220;innocent until proven guilty&#8221; is still a true principle.<br />
We all have our opinions on OJ. Many of you seem to have similar thoughts on Chmura. However, they are considered innocent until proven guilty, and both men were most certainly NOT proven guilty!<br />
If you feel the need to validate Bob Nelson&#8217;s Oxycontin-fueled insane ramblings with the puerile playground retort of &#8220;but they did it too!&#8221;, by all means do so. All I ask, however, is that you find a Packer player who was actually CONVICTED, so as to have a actual respectable argument. There are several to choose from.<br />
and THEN Tompadre says:<br />
(You GB fans better hope C Matthews is using a diuretic for masking purposes as well)<br />
___________________________________<br />
That&#8217;s hilarious. Got any facts to back that accusation up? Of course not. Just &#8220;OMG, that fudgie&#8217;s played good ans stuff.. he must be on drugs!!!1!&#8221;<br />
You redneck idiots have spent so much time not caring about your team, now that they&#8217;re doing well you don&#8217;t even know what you&#8217;re watching. At least it&#8217;s good for a laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tompadre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompadre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Nelson -
Hornung, Jolly, Harris, Barnett, Chmura, Favre, Robinson, Cade...
Gambling, drugs, battery, rape, spousal abuse, drinking with minors, speeding...
Yep, the Packers got it all covered.
As the old saying goes there Bobber, &quot;idiots who live in glass houses...&quot;
(You GB fans better hope C Matthews is using a diuretic for masking purposes as well)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob Nelson -<br />
Hornung, Jolly, Harris, Barnett, Chmura, Favre, Robinson, Cade&#8230;<br />
Gambling, drugs, battery, rape, spousal abuse, drinking with minors, speeding&#8230;<br />
Yep, the Packers got it all covered.<br />
As the old saying goes there Bobber, &#8220;idiots who live in glass houses&#8230;&#8221;<br />
(You GB fans better hope C Matthews is using a diuretic for masking purposes as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tompadre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompadre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting that Fire Ted should spend eight years in the servicce, including time in Desert Storm, fighting for our safety, our freedoms, our rights, yet doesn&#039;t believe in states rights in this situation.
For you GB fans referring to the Williams Wall as fat I have just one question: Have you taken a look at the lard-arses you have on your d-line?  For that matter, take a look at any offensive or defensive line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that Fire Ted should spend eight years in the servicce, including time in Desert Storm, fighting for our safety, our freedoms, our rights, yet doesn&#8217;t believe in states rights in this situation.<br />
For you GB fans referring to the Williams Wall as fat I have just one question: Have you taken a look at the lard-arses you have on your d-line?  For that matter, take a look at any offensive or defensive line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tompadre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompadre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beer says:
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!
--------------------------------------------------
Just llike in the OJ case, right?
In a court of law they don&#039;t find a defendant &quot;innocent&quot;, they find them &quot;not guilty&quot;.  There is a significant difference between the two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beer says:<br />
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Just llike in the OJ case, right?<br />
In a court of law they don&#8217;t find a defendant &#8220;innocent&#8221;, they find them &#8220;not guilty&#8221;.  There is a significant difference between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: footballrulz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[footballrulz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@bustabloodvessel
Nice comment about serving the US.  I&#039;m an Army vet but have respect for anyone who serves in any capacity including the Caost Guard &amp; Border Patrol.  It&#039;s a contractual obligation to put your life on the line for your country &amp; I&#039;m proud to say I served my time as I&#039;m sure many here have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bustabloodvessel<br />
Nice comment about serving the US.  I&#8217;m an Army vet but have respect for anyone who serves in any capacity including the Caost Guard &#038; Border Patrol.  It&#8217;s a contractual obligation to put your life on the line for your country &#038; I&#8217;m proud to say I served my time as I&#8217;m sure many here have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bustabloodvessel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bustabloodvessel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regretably, I did not.  My father, his father, and his father did serve, so I know the sacrifice all make, even during peace time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regretably, I did not.  My father, his father, and his father did serve, so I know the sacrifice all make, even during peace time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PervyHarvin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PervyHarvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ FireTed- Grow up man,act like a soldier. I&#039;m all Army 95 Bravo to the bone dude but will never slam the other branches. Like a football team dude,you need different units to get the job done.   BTW-I don&#039;t give a rats ass about Al Franken. Quit talking about my junk Nancy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ FireTed- Grow up man,act like a soldier. I&#8217;m all Army 95 Bravo to the bone dude but will never slam the other branches. Like a football team dude,you need different units to get the job done.   BTW-I don&#8217;t give a rats ass about Al Franken. Quit talking about my junk Nancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigskyvikes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigskyvikes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bustabloodvessel says:
December 15, 2009 10:05 AM
Fire ted,
If you truly served, much love and respect, but don&#039;t start the our branch is the best crap. You served the United States, just like everyone in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. Treat them all with respect, for they are all your brothers in arms.
-------------------------------------------------
Spoken like a true PATRIOT!!!!!!
Very nice, and thank you, I didnt serve, but I assume you did, so thank you again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bustabloodvessel says:<br />
December 15, 2009 10:05 AM<br />
Fire ted,<br />
If you truly served, much love and respect, but don&#8217;t start the our branch is the best crap. You served the United States, just like everyone in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. Treat them all with respect, for they are all your brothers in arms.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Spoken like a true PATRIOT!!!!!!<br />
Very nice, and thank you, I didnt serve, but I assume you did, so thank you again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bustabloodvessel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bustabloodvessel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fire ted,
If you truly served, much love and respect, but don&#039;t start the our branch is the best crap.  You served the United States, just like everyone in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.  Treat them all with respect, for they are all your brothers in arms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fire ted,<br />
If you truly served, much love and respect, but don&#8217;t start the our branch is the best crap.  You served the United States, just like everyone in the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines.  Treat them all with respect, for they are all your brothers in arms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ambrose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The policy was unclear in the first place, so who gives a crap. And some players (like them) will look for any fringe-dwelling substance-advantage that they can, pushing the envelope all the way. Maybe these fat bookends were influenced by their fans and just trying to lose weight, like so many other Minnesotans. If these guys are so good, why the extra push? No confidence?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The policy was unclear in the first place, so who gives a crap. And some players (like them) will look for any fringe-dwelling substance-advantage that they can, pushing the envelope all the way. Maybe these fat bookends were influenced by their fans and just trying to lose weight, like so many other Minnesotans. If these guys are so good, why the extra push? No confidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigskyvikes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigskyvikes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jungle Juice says:
December 15, 2009 12:55 AM
So they are letting the cheaters get away with it. Saints and Vikings fans. If you get to or win the SuperBowl there will be nothing to &quot;flush&quot; out the Cheater stigma attached to any accomplishment. Everyone will always remember that these guys obviously took steroids and tried to hide it with StarCaps
--------------------------------------------------
Yeah, If one of these teams win there should be an asteric after the win, right?
What an effing moron.
This happened a season ago, they just havent been punished for it yet, it was proven they were not hiding steroids with this, so what is your point, exactley?
Keep your mouth shut, there is enough retarded, non-educated comments on the Viking post&#039;s from real bitter rival fans, we dont need yours.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jungle Juice says:<br />
December 15, 2009 12:55 AM<br />
So they are letting the cheaters get away with it. Saints and Vikings fans. If you get to or win the SuperBowl there will be nothing to &#8220;flush&#8221; out the Cheater stigma attached to any accomplishment. Everyone will always remember that these guys obviously took steroids and tried to hide it with StarCaps<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Yeah, If one of these teams win there should be an asteric after the win, right?<br />
What an effing moron.<br />
This happened a season ago, they just havent been punished for it yet, it was proven they were not hiding steroids with this, so what is your point, exactley?<br />
Keep your mouth shut, there is enough retarded, non-educated comments on the Viking post&#8217;s from real bitter rival fans, we dont need yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Saints have benefited from Will Smith&#039;s presence, but Charles Grant is a liability. So this has been a Seinfeld event for the Saints (Kramer: &quot;You&#039;re Even Steven!!&quot;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Saints have benefited from Will Smith&#8217;s presence, but Charles Grant is a liability. So this has been a Seinfeld event for the Saints (Kramer: &#8220;You&#8217;re Even Steven!!&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sand0</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sand0]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In MN we don&#039;t allow employers to suspend employees and retract over a million dollars in pay for them having a legal substance in their blood stream unless said employee has his day in court.
It is our law.  The NFL made a rule that couldn&#039;t be held in court the way they were hoping.  Deal with it haters.
They could still be suspended, but they first get to plead their case.  I know you want them to be suspended for the playoffs so bad you can taste it but this isn&#039;t about Packer fans and NFL policy sticklers.  It is about the rights of two men under MN state law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In MN we don&#8217;t allow employers to suspend employees and retract over a million dollars in pay for them having a legal substance in their blood stream unless said employee has his day in court.<br />
It is our law.  The NFL made a rule that couldn&#8217;t be held in court the way they were hoping.  Deal with it haters.<br />
They could still be suspended, but they first get to plead their case.  I know you want them to be suspended for the playoffs so bad you can taste it but this isn&#8217;t about Packer fans and NFL policy sticklers.  It is about the rights of two men under MN state law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigskyvikes</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigskyvikes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bigrig says:
December 14, 2009 9:41 PM
I am really impressed with Viking&#039;s fans. Almost 50 years of never winning anything. Most of you probably haven&#039;t even had the viewing pleasure of seeing the Vikings lose a SB [33 years ago].
The team is bouncing between getting a new stadium or possibly moving. Their best season in a decade comes during a year they are at best second in the conference to the Saints. Yet these poor folks keep coming back for more.
Cling to this team while you still have them. Ask yourselves this. If someone offered you a bigger, better home with smaller payments and you also didn&#039;t have to shovel piles of snow out of your driveway six months out of the year, what would do?
------------------------------------------------
This all from a guy (yet to be determined) who hovers around PFT to find Viking post&#039;s, and he says we cling, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
If you, bob dumbassnelson, jimmydipsmith could only see how idiotic you guys look on here, continually following Viking posts and spewing shit out of your butt holes.
The funny thing is how CONSUMED you three are and GBP, might as well through in fire gay ted also.
Its really sad how you guys look, so threatened you all are!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bigrig says:<br />
December 14, 2009 9:41 PM<br />
I am really impressed with Viking&#8217;s fans. Almost 50 years of never winning anything. Most of you probably haven&#8217;t even had the viewing pleasure of seeing the Vikings lose a SB [33 years ago].<br />
The team is bouncing between getting a new stadium or possibly moving. Their best season in a decade comes during a year they are at best second in the conference to the Saints. Yet these poor folks keep coming back for more.<br />
Cling to this team while you still have them. Ask yourselves this. If someone offered you a bigger, better home with smaller payments and you also didn&#8217;t have to shovel piles of snow out of your driveway six months out of the year, what would do?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
This all from a guy (yet to be determined) who hovers around PFT to find Viking post&#8217;s, and he says we cling, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br />
If you, bob dumbassnelson, jimmydipsmith could only see how idiotic you guys look on here, continually following Viking posts and spewing shit out of your butt holes.<br />
The funny thing is how CONSUMED you three are and GBP, might as well through in fire gay ted also.<br />
Its really sad how you guys look, so threatened you all are!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fire Ted</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fire Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, Pervy, I served eight years in the Marine Corps, including Desert Storm...dumbass.  As to whether Ventura was a seal, who cares....the Navy is the farm system for the Corps, plus he is a dumbass.  I also noticed you have no halfwit comeback for why exactly Al Franken got elected?  Lastly, I don&#039;t have a sister, so you are the expert on sleeping with your sister....while your mom takes pictures and laughs at your tiny junk.
How exactly is Minnesota forward thinking?  That&#039;s effing hilarious.  Maybe if they were forward thinking, they wouldn&#039;t have a shithole stadium that has lost 2/3 of its tenants over the last year in prime Minneapolis real estate with no real plan what to do for the Vikings and this ridiculous hope that if &quot;Favre gets us a Super Bowl&quot; we&#039;ll get a new house....effing hilarious.
As for &quot;all the guys involved being big,&quot; Deuce McCallister is involved, and was not trying to lose weight...and the rules are the rules.
As to states&#039; rights, the NFL is unique...the &quot;union&quot; status of the NFL should not be compared to a typical labor union.  The only reason the union exists in the NFL is to wring more money out of the owners.  Playing in the NFL is a privelage and state labor laws have no place in this situation.  It&#039;s a cop out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Pervy, I served eight years in the Marine Corps, including Desert Storm&#8230;dumbass.  As to whether Ventura was a seal, who cares&#8230;.the Navy is the farm system for the Corps, plus he is a dumbass.  I also noticed you have no halfwit comeback for why exactly Al Franken got elected?  Lastly, I don&#8217;t have a sister, so you are the expert on sleeping with your sister&#8230;.while your mom takes pictures and laughs at your tiny junk.<br />
How exactly is Minnesota forward thinking?  That&#8217;s effing hilarious.  Maybe if they were forward thinking, they wouldn&#8217;t have a shithole stadium that has lost 2/3 of its tenants over the last year in prime Minneapolis real estate with no real plan what to do for the Vikings and this ridiculous hope that if &#8220;Favre gets us a Super Bowl&#8221; we&#8217;ll get a new house&#8230;.effing hilarious.<br />
As for &#8220;all the guys involved being big,&#8221; Deuce McCallister is involved, and was not trying to lose weight&#8230;and the rules are the rules.<br />
As to states&#8217; rights, the NFL is unique&#8230;the &#8220;union&#8221; status of the NFL should not be compared to a typical labor union.  The only reason the union exists in the NFL is to wring more money out of the owners.  Playing in the NFL is a privelage and state labor laws have no place in this situation.  It&#8217;s a cop out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saint33</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saint33]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the moronic ignorance of some of the bitter fans on this board is unbelievable.
If you don&#039;t know the simple facts you shouldn&#039;t be commenting on the subject.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the moronic ignorance of some of the bitter fans on this board is unbelievable.<br />
If you don&#8217;t know the simple facts you shouldn&#8217;t be commenting on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elgar</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elgar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is no surprise that states are empowered to enact state laws.   This has been part of the Constitution since 1791.   The twenty-eight-word Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights is quite clear about it:  If authority is not granted to the the federal government by the Constitution itself, the power resides with the states and with the people.   Federal law only trumps state law where the Constitution says it does.  This country was founded to bring freedom to the people, not to make life easier for lazy lawyers and administrators being paid at large sporting leagues.  Minnesotans are not exempt from drug policies.   The policies being used just have to be legal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is no surprise that states are empowered to enact state laws.   This has been part of the Constitution since 1791.   The twenty-eight-word Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights is quite clear about it:  If authority is not granted to the the federal government by the Constitution itself, the power resides with the states and with the people.   Federal law only trumps state law where the Constitution says it does.  This country was founded to bring freedom to the people, not to make life easier for lazy lawyers and administrators being paid at large sporting leagues.  Minnesotans are not exempt from drug policies.   The policies being used just have to be legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beer Cheese Soup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beer Cheese Soup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DocBG says:
@ bob, your team elects rapists into their hall of fame.
____________________________________
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED! The NFL&#039;s case against the Williams&#039; fat asses was indeed a pile of crap, but if that (or Jolly&#039;s cough syrup binge) is the best argument you have, you might as well pack it in.
Bob is enough of a moron all on his own. You don&#039;t need to join him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DocBG says:<br />
@ bob, your team elects rapists into their hall of fame.<br />
____________________________________<br />
Innocent until proven guilty dumbass. Even more innocent when ACQUITTED! The NFL&#8217;s case against the Williams&#8217; fat asses was indeed a pile of crap, but if that (or Jolly&#8217;s cough syrup binge) is the best argument you have, you might as well pack it in.<br />
Bob is enough of a moron all on his own. You don&#8217;t need to join him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purplejesus28</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purplejesus28]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so many jealous people. if you lived in forward-thinking states (where employees are protected) instead of states where you can marry your sister and make babies, maybe you would understand the rights of others.  Adept has some good info for you morons. even if it was an illegal substance, an employee can not be punished for one failed drug test. they have to be given the opportunity to get themselves clean, normally at the expense of the employer.
@JimmySmith
&quot;Instead of taking like a man &quot;  What? are you Ms. Swan from MadTV? I do admit you were right about the two sets of rules though. The standard rules of football that apply to the league and the other set that get overlooked when playing the Vikings. The refs hold a grudge from getting cracked in the face after the &quot;Pearson Push&quot; Hail Mary game.
&quot;icy December winter roads of Minnesota&quot; and by this statement I assume you do not live here (yeah!) but it is not fact. a quick science nugget, you need both precipiation and below freezing temperatures to make ice. we didn&#039;t have that combination until just recently, well after the mentioned incidents. doesn&#039;t excuse it, but just another example of how ignorant you are.
@Bob Nelson
&quot;the public trust in NFL players&quot; Like those convicted of vehicular manslaughter? Dog-fighting? Murder? yeah, they&#039;re much more trusted than the average citizen.
No wonder you turds have no friends on pft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so many jealous people. if you lived in forward-thinking states (where employees are protected) instead of states where you can marry your sister and make babies, maybe you would understand the rights of others.  Adept has some good info for you morons. even if it was an illegal substance, an employee can not be punished for one failed drug test. they have to be given the opportunity to get themselves clean, normally at the expense of the employer.<br />
@JimmySmith<br />
&#8220;Instead of taking like a man &#8221;  What? are you Ms. Swan from MadTV? I do admit you were right about the two sets of rules though. The standard rules of football that apply to the league and the other set that get overlooked when playing the Vikings. The refs hold a grudge from getting cracked in the face after the &#8220;Pearson Push&#8221; Hail Mary game.<br />
&#8220;icy December winter roads of Minnesota&#8221; and by this statement I assume you do not live here (yeah!) but it is not fact. a quick science nugget, you need both precipiation and below freezing temperatures to make ice. we didn&#8217;t have that combination until just recently, well after the mentioned incidents. doesn&#8217;t excuse it, but just another example of how ignorant you are.<br />
@Bob Nelson<br />
&#8220;the public trust in NFL players&#8221; Like those convicted of vehicular manslaughter? Dog-fighting? Murder? yeah, they&#8217;re much more trusted than the average citizen.<br />
No wonder you turds have no friends on pft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lost</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PackerFan can go pee up a rope. Or anywhere else the employer specifies.
You clowns could try aim for the cup but the way things have been going you&#039;d probably miss and spill all over your boss&#039; hand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PackerFan can go pee up a rope. Or anywhere else the employer specifies.<br />
You clowns could try aim for the cup but the way things have been going you&#8217;d probably miss and spill all over your boss&#8217; hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jungle Juice</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jungle Juice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they are letting the cheaters get away with it. Saints and Vikings fans. If you get to or win the SuperBowl there will be nothing to &quot;flush&quot; out the Cheater stigma attached to any accomplishment. Everyone will always remember that these guys obviously took steroids and tried to hide it with StarCaps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they are letting the cheaters get away with it. Saints and Vikings fans. If you get to or win the SuperBowl there will be nothing to &#8220;flush&#8221; out the Cheater stigma attached to any accomplishment. Everyone will always remember that these guys obviously took steroids and tried to hide it with StarCaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hail2ThaRedskins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386247</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hail2ThaRedskins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bluestree &amp; Adept,
I am aware that diuretucs can be used to conceal the use of other illegal substances.  But the league has already conceeded that was not the case with these players!
That is why I think it is so asinine that they are pushing this one.  They know they players weren&#039;t taking steriods, they could have warned them specificially that StarCaps had the league banned substance in it even though it wasn&#039;t on the label, but they wanted to make an example of them and it backfired.  Just let it go already.  Close the loophole in the next CBA and work with the union to keep players informed instead of trying to entrap them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bluestree &#038; Adept,<br />
I am aware that diuretucs can be used to conceal the use of other illegal substances.  But the league has already conceeded that was not the case with these players!<br />
That is why I think it is so asinine that they are pushing this one.  They know they players weren&#8217;t taking steriods, they could have warned them specificially that StarCaps had the league banned substance in it even though it wasn&#8217;t on the label, but they wanted to make an example of them and it backfired.  Just let it go already.  Close the loophole in the next CBA and work with the union to keep players informed instead of trying to entrap them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocBG</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DocBG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ bob, your team elects rapists into their hall of fame. Granted, a jury of his &quot;season ticket holding&quot; peers let him off because of the efforts of Favre during a season, but still. you are worried about what happened between consenting adults (love boat) and ignoring what happened between a man and a child. a pedophile if ever there was one. get a clue douchebag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ bob, your team elects rapists into their hall of fame. Granted, a jury of his &#8220;season ticket holding&#8221; peers let him off because of the efforts of Favre during a season, but still. you are worried about what happened between consenting adults (love boat) and ignoring what happened between a man and a child. a pedophile if ever there was one. get a clue douchebag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: footballisfun</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[footballisfun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who has suffered from hearing all of the right-wing nut jobs in this country - since Raygun -  complain against the federal government, and praise states rights, it&#039;s a pure joy to hear them now complain AGAINST state rights because of this ruling.
Sadly, rightwingers are too stupid to see the irony.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has suffered from hearing all of the right-wing nut jobs in this country &#8211; since Raygun &#8211;  complain against the federal government, and praise states rights, it&#8217;s a pure joy to hear them now complain AGAINST state rights because of this ruling.<br />
Sadly, rightwingers are too stupid to see the irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bustabloodvessel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bustabloodvessel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please everyone, DO NOT respond to anything bob nelson or fire ted have to say.  Maybe they will just go away.  I don&#039;t think anyone involved should be suspended.  Look at all the guys in trouble with this case.  Everyone is a big guy.  None of them took it to mask steroids, they just wanted to lose some weight before camp.  The big question I have is why hasn&#039;t anyone gone after starcaps for not including this ingredient on the label?  Isn&#039;t there some sort of law that requires them to list ALL ingredients?  Maybe they have and I just haven&#039;t heard about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please everyone, DO NOT respond to anything bob nelson or fire ted have to say.  Maybe they will just go away.  I don&#8217;t think anyone involved should be suspended.  Look at all the guys in trouble with this case.  Everyone is a big guy.  None of them took it to mask steroids, they just wanted to lose some weight before camp.  The big question I have is why hasn&#8217;t anyone gone after starcaps for not including this ingredient on the label?  Isn&#8217;t there some sort of law that requires them to list ALL ingredients?  Maybe they have and I just haven&#8217;t heard about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigrig</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigrig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were involved in a business that conducted interstate commerce and a certain state kept ruling against you in the courts, would you want to continue doing business in that state?
Hello LA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were involved in a business that conducted interstate commerce and a certain state kept ruling against you in the courts, would you want to continue doing business in that state?<br />
Hello LA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fire Ted</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/14/appeals-court-refuses-to-grant-rehearing-in-starcaps-case/#comment-386242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fire Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=69209#comment-386242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, MN is the state that put a pro (sic) wrestler in the Governor&#039;s shanty and elected (cheated) a half-assed comedian as US Senator....their political structure is a sick combination of NAMBLA and the prom committee.  Retards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, MN is the state that put a pro (sic) wrestler in the Governor&#8217;s shanty and elected (cheated) a half-assed comedian as US Senator&#8230;.their political structure is a sick combination of NAMBLA and the prom committee.  Retards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
