<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your 2009 All Pro Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tompadre</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tompadre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super -
&quot;He (Peterson) did not have a All pro year in most opinions.&quot;
--------------------------------------------------------
Just how long did it take you to obtain everyone&#039;s opinion to come to that conclusion?
&quot;Touchdowns? take away the 1 yard 1st and 2nd and goal TD&#039;s to get te &quot;differance making&quot; number of productive touchdowns.&quot;
------------------------------------------------------
I thought all touchdowns produced the same thing - 6 points, thus making the same difference in the game - increasing a lead by 6 or decreasing a deficit by 6.  This isn&#039;t fantasy football where longer scores garner more points.
&quot;In my opinion differance making TD&#039;s count. The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.  i just disagree with the selection. by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.&quot;
-------------------------------------------------------
Doesn&#039;t mean squat??  It doesn&#039;t make sense!  Quite frankly this statement is idiotic beyond belief!  Since you obviously gathered everyone&#039;s opinion on AD&#039;s All Pro worthiness, you should also take a poll of all the RB&#039;s in NFL history who failed to score from the one and in, and thus their team&#039;s failure to score a TD, and ask them if those 1 yrd plunges count or if they make a difference.
Bottom line - Peterson&#039;s ypc is right there with the other backs worthy of consideration.  He has more TDs than anyone and more recieving yards than the other backs mentioned except Rice, who has less than half the TDs.  It isn&#039;t that outrageous he was chosen.
Agree on the two RBs being picked though - weird!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super -<br />
&#8220;He (Peterson) did not have a All pro year in most opinions.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Just how long did it take you to obtain everyone&#8217;s opinion to come to that conclusion?<br />
&#8220;Touchdowns? take away the 1 yard 1st and 2nd and goal TD&#8217;s to get te &#8220;differance making&#8221; number of productive touchdowns.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I thought all touchdowns produced the same thing &#8211; 6 points, thus making the same difference in the game &#8211; increasing a lead by 6 or decreasing a deficit by 6.  This isn&#8217;t fantasy football where longer scores garner more points.<br />
&#8220;In my opinion differance making TD&#8217;s count. The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.  i just disagree with the selection. by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Doesn&#8217;t mean squat??  It doesn&#8217;t make sense!  Quite frankly this statement is idiotic beyond belief!  Since you obviously gathered everyone&#8217;s opinion on AD&#8217;s All Pro worthiness, you should also take a poll of all the RB&#8217;s in NFL history who failed to score from the one and in, and thus their team&#8217;s failure to score a TD, and ask them if those 1 yrd plunges count or if they make a difference.<br />
Bottom line &#8211; Peterson&#8217;s ypc is right there with the other backs worthy of consideration.  He has more TDs than anyone and more recieving yards than the other backs mentioned except Rice, who has less than half the TDs.  It isn&#8217;t that outrageous he was chosen.<br />
Agree on the two RBs being picked though &#8211; weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Favre On HGH</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Favre On HGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Asante Samuel, Philadelphia shouldn&#039;t be on there. His best days were with the Pats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asante Samuel, Philadelphia shouldn&#8217;t be on there. His best days were with the Pats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobrala2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cobrala2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is either given credit???  Both are based largely upon journalists&#039; opinions.  Whoop-dee-doo.  Thank God the Super Bowl winner isn&#039;t decided by journalists...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is either given credit???  Both are based largely upon journalists&#8217; opinions.  Whoop-dee-doo.  Thank God the Super Bowl winner isn&#8217;t decided by journalists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam-Chris Scheftersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jx4cmario1 says:
January 14, 2010 4:14 PM
And only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP. But you conviently left that out. AP did more with less. Plus had more yards from scrimmage than 2 of those 3.
---------------------------
I conveniently left it out because it didn&#039;t enter into what I was disputing.  If Peterson ran the ball more than all but 3 NFL RBs could you possibly make the assertion that they&#039;re a pass happy team?  No.
Also, you don&#039;t find it just a little bit misleading to say, &quot;only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP&quot;?  You could also say that only one of the 3 men with more carries had a LOWER ypc than Peterson.
Or I could say that only 4 of the top 10 RBs by carries had FEWER ypc than Peterson.
But none of that enters into the discussion of whether or not the Vikings offense is &quot;pass happy&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jx4cmario1 says:<br />
January 14, 2010 4:14 PM<br />
And only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP. But you conviently left that out. AP did more with less. Plus had more yards from scrimmage than 2 of those 3.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I conveniently left it out because it didn&#8217;t enter into what I was disputing.  If Peterson ran the ball more than all but 3 NFL RBs could you possibly make the assertion that they&#8217;re a pass happy team?  No.<br />
Also, you don&#8217;t find it just a little bit misleading to say, &#8220;only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP&#8221;?  You could also say that only one of the 3 men with more carries had a LOWER ypc than Peterson.<br />
Or I could say that only 4 of the top 10 RBs by carries had FEWER ypc than Peterson.<br />
But none of that enters into the discussion of whether or not the Vikings offense is &#8220;pass happy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MustaphaM0nd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MustaphaM0nd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to clarify, the record is 143 by Marvin Harrison. Welker was not going to break that record and catch 20 passes in the last game.
If he hadnt sat out the first two games he may have done it.
And while we&#039;re speculating, if he had caught his 9 passes in the first two games, perhaps his knee would have buckled in week 15. All we know is that Welker tied Herman Moore in 14 games (122 in 13, 1 in the game he was injured)
On other selections...
Asante is a playmaker but idk if his game is complete enough to warrant an all-pro selection.
Peterson had an elite year. Not as memorable as previous years, but still among the best of the best. Having said that...AD fumbled a game away. With ball security issues like that, he the tiebreaker in my book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to clarify, the record is 143 by Marvin Harrison. Welker was not going to break that record and catch 20 passes in the last game.<br />
If he hadnt sat out the first two games he may have done it.<br />
And while we&#8217;re speculating, if he had caught his 9 passes in the first two games, perhaps his knee would have buckled in week 15. All we know is that Welker tied Herman Moore in 14 games (122 in 13, 1 in the game he was injured)<br />
On other selections&#8230;<br />
Asante is a playmaker but idk if his game is complete enough to warrant an all-pro selection.<br />
Peterson had an elite year. Not as memorable as previous years, but still among the best of the best. Having said that&#8230;AD fumbled a game away. With ball security issues like that, he the tiebreaker in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasonable</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reasonable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get off Welkers ass. He had tied for the second most catches all time(  123 )and only played 13 games! hE WOULD HAVE EASILY SET A NEW nfl RECORD HAD HE NOT GOT HURT ON THE FIRST DRIVE OF THE hOUSTON GAME.He had a hell of a year and got the crap knocked out of him all season long.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get off Welkers ass. He had tied for the second most catches all time(  123 )and only played 13 games! hE WOULD HAVE EASILY SET A NEW nfl RECORD HAD HE NOT GOT HURT ON THE FIRST DRIVE OF THE hOUSTON GAME.He had a hell of a year and got the crap knocked out of him all season long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jx4cmario1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jx4cmario1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Pass happy Vikes offense? Three men in the NFL had more rushing attempts than Peterson. Three.
-----------------------------------------------
And only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP. But you conviently left that out. AP did more with less. Plus had more yards from scrimmage than 2 of those 3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pass happy Vikes offense? Three men in the NFL had more rushing attempts than Peterson. Three.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
And only one of those men (Chris Johnson) had a better ypc than AP. But you conviently left that out. AP did more with less. Plus had more yards from scrimmage than 2 of those 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam-Chris Scheftersen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam-Chris Scheftersen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notoroius B.U.G. says:
January 14, 2010 11:40 AM
Supersuckers: Why do you think AD shouldn&#039;t be on the first team? Fumbles? He did have 18 rushing TDs...and was 5th in rushing yards with a pass happy Vikes offense.
-----------------------------
Pass happy Vikes offense?  Three men in the NFL had more rushing attempts than Peterson.  Three.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notoroius B.U.G. says:<br />
January 14, 2010 11:40 AM<br />
Supersuckers: Why do you think AD shouldn&#8217;t be on the first team? Fumbles? He did have 18 rushing TDs&#8230;and was 5th in rushing yards with a pass happy Vikes offense.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Pass happy Vikes offense?  Three men in the NFL had more rushing attempts than Peterson.  Three.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .VoxVeritas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.VoxVeritas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Once again faux me&quot;
Not with a borrowed coquette.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Once again faux me&#8221;<br />
Not with a borrowed coquette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireJerryJones</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FireJerryJones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welker belongs.
Nnamdi Assomoghua is over rated and so is Assante Samuel.
Revis is the main shut down corner in the NFL right now.
BDawk and Ed Reed are there on reputation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welker belongs.<br />
Nnamdi Assomoghua is over rated and so is Assante Samuel.<br />
Revis is the main shut down corner in the NFL right now.<br />
BDawk and Ed Reed are there on reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finsbooyah</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429093</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finsbooyah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polite getting snubbed again here just goes to to show that the people who vote for this honor aren&#039;t as credible as they&#039;re made out to be.   In 2009 he was by far the best FB in the game.  but I guess since he spent most of his time blocking, these so called &quot;experts&quot; wouldn&#039;t consider him as good as McClain.  Yea, ok.
Also, Peterson is a bit overrated in my opinion.  Don&#039;t get me wrong I think he&#039;s great, but he is more of a highlight reel runner than anything else.  Steven Jackson is a superior running back.  He&#039;s been more consistant all year and he plays behind a terrible O-Line, and for a team that gameplan all week to stop him and no one else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polite getting snubbed again here just goes to to show that the people who vote for this honor aren&#8217;t as credible as they&#8217;re made out to be.   In 2009 he was by far the best FB in the game.  but I guess since he spent most of his time blocking, these so called &#8220;experts&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t consider him as good as McClain.  Yea, ok.<br />
Also, Peterson is a bit overrated in my opinion.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong I think he&#8217;s great, but he is more of a highlight reel runner than anything else.  Steven Jackson is a superior running back.  He&#8217;s been more consistant all year and he plays behind a terrible O-Line, and for a team that gameplan all week to stop him and no one else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MustaphaM0nd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MustaphaM0nd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wes Welker is an all-pro. He caught 122 passes in the 13 games he played (thats excluding WK17). Thats almost 10 a game.
I&#039;m a Jets fan but you&#039;ve gotta give the kid his due.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes Welker is an all-pro. He caught 122 passes in the 13 games he played (thats excluding WK17). Thats almost 10 a game.<br />
I&#8217;m a Jets fan but you&#8217;ve gotta give the kid his due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slutnuts</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slutnuts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Supersuckers
have to agree with you, the only thing worse than the 1 yd td vulture, is the 1yd td dance and posture. tomlinson is the best at them, he runs 4 times on a drive for 7 yards, rivers throws for 72 yards to get to the 1 and LT plunges in and celebrates like he was the difference maker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Supersuckers<br />
have to agree with you, the only thing worse than the 1 yd td vulture, is the 1yd td dance and posture. tomlinson is the best at them, he runs 4 times on a drive for 7 yards, rivers throws for 72 yards to get to the 1 and LT plunges in and celebrates like he was the difference maker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429090</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hutchinson for the Vikes got in on past reputation -- his shoulder injury has made him less than All-Pro caliber this year.
And what&#039;s with the whining about Mathews?  The guy didn&#039;t start till the season was 1/4 over, and he takes himself out of as many plays as he makes, when he&#039;s not getting hammered by an O -lineman on running plays of course.  He&#039;s good, but not All-Pro yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hutchinson for the Vikes got in on past reputation &#8212; his shoulder injury has made him less than All-Pro caliber this year.<br />
And what&#8217;s with the whining about Mathews?  The guy didn&#8217;t start till the season was 1/4 over, and he takes himself out of as many plays as he makes, when he&#8217;s not getting hammered by an O -lineman on running plays of course.  He&#8217;s good, but not All-Pro yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jx4cmario1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jx4cmario1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it was 1 RB per All pro team, then obviously CJ would get the nod, but with 2 I think CJ and AP are 1 and 2. And you do make a good point regarding his 1 yd garbage TDs but still, 6 points is 6 points man...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it was 1 RB per All pro team, then obviously CJ would get the nod, but with 2 I think CJ and AP are 1 and 2. And you do make a good point regarding his 1 yd garbage TDs but still, 6 points is 6 points man&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey blackandteal ,
Too Bad Ray Rice had like 300 more receiving yards and rushed for only 60 less yards than MJD but on 60 less attempts.  MJD is good but RR is definitely deserving.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey blackandteal ,<br />
Too Bad Ray Rice had like 300 more receiving yards and rushed for only 60 less yards than MJD but on 60 less attempts.  MJD is good but RR is definitely deserving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supersuckers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supersuckers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jx4cmario1 says:
January 14, 2010 1:22 PM
Super- Let&#039;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#039;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#039;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs.....you are obviously just a Viking hater.
---
Notice i didn&#039;t mention anything about the other viking selections.  A true hater would have.     you have to look at differance making TD&#039;s vs. 1 yard plunges.   bubba Franks made a living catching the 1 yard 1st and goal TD pass from favre.  I could have caught it thasts the point.    In my opinion differance making TD&#039;s count.   The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.
If Peterson is 2nd in yards in teh NFC alone and we knwo what johnson did in tennessee how can you make a reasonable argument for Peterson being all-pro?    Though he showed measurable improvement in pass blocking he is still a liability in that department and he has ball security issues.   i just disagree with the selection.  by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jx4cmario1 says:<br />
January 14, 2010 1:22 PM<br />
Super- Let&#8217;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#8217;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#8217;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs&#8230;..you are obviously just a Viking hater.<br />
&#8212;<br />
Notice i didn&#8217;t mention anything about the other viking selections.  A true hater would have.     you have to look at differance making TD&#8217;s vs. 1 yard plunges.   bubba Franks made a living catching the 1 yard 1st and goal TD pass from favre.  I could have caught it thasts the point.    In my opinion differance making TD&#8217;s count.   The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.<br />
If Peterson is 2nd in yards in teh NFC alone and we knwo what johnson did in tennessee how can you make a reasonable argument for Peterson being all-pro?    Though he showed measurable improvement in pass blocking he is still a liability in that department and he has ball security issues.   i just disagree with the selection.  by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grunt24</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grunt24]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jx4cmario i agree with you, dont forget that AP had over 40 catches and almost 500 yards,  they got it right with him and cj--and this is coming from a packer fan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jx4cmario i agree with you, dont forget that AP had over 40 catches and almost 500 yards,  they got it right with him and cj&#8211;and this is coming from a packer fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cardsfan81</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cardsfan81]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The list is a good one with a few notable exceptions.
1. Wes Welker does not belong. Welker is a role Wr. and only runs 2 routes on the NFL passing tree (the pivot and option routes.)
2. Larry Fitzgerald was not the fourth best Wr in the league in 2009. He&#039;s not a stretch the field guy and benefits greatly from Anquan Boldin opposite him and his coach calling almost all the redzone targets for him. The NFL PR machine in full effect with Fitzgerald and Welker selections.The power forward Wr Vincent Jackson had a much better season the both Welker and Fitzgerald. Jackson was on a team that won 11 straight games and did not have an exploisive run game. Jackson is one of the great NFL Wr&#039;s that get too little attention and acclaim.
3. Hutchinson is a declining player and part of the reason for the declining statistics of Adrian Peterson as the season went on. Hutch does not belong. A reputation choice only.
4. Adrian Wilson is out of place too. He had at least 5 poor games this season (watch the Bears tape.) Not sure what the All-Pro voters saw but it was obviously different from what I saw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list is a good one with a few notable exceptions.<br />
1. Wes Welker does not belong. Welker is a role Wr. and only runs 2 routes on the NFL passing tree (the pivot and option routes.)<br />
2. Larry Fitzgerald was not the fourth best Wr in the league in 2009. He&#8217;s not a stretch the field guy and benefits greatly from Anquan Boldin opposite him and his coach calling almost all the redzone targets for him. The NFL PR machine in full effect with Fitzgerald and Welker selections.The power forward Wr Vincent Jackson had a much better season the both Welker and Fitzgerald. Jackson was on a team that won 11 straight games and did not have an exploisive run game. Jackson is one of the great NFL Wr&#8217;s that get too little attention and acclaim.<br />
3. Hutchinson is a declining player and part of the reason for the declining statistics of Adrian Peterson as the season went on. Hutch does not belong. A reputation choice only.<br />
4. Adrian Wilson is out of place too. He had at least 5 poor games this season (watch the Bears tape.) Not sure what the All-Pro voters saw but it was obviously different from what I saw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppdoc13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ppdoc13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kevin williams or jay ratliff over Ngata. i hope the dope you are smoking is expensive, because you are hallucinating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevin williams or jay ratliff over Ngata. i hope the dope you are smoking is expensive, because you are hallucinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supersuckers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supersuckers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jx4cmario1 says:
January 14, 2010 1:22 PM
Super- Let&#039;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#039;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#039;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs.....you are obviously just a Viking hater.
---
Notice i didn&#039;t mention anything about the other viking selections.  A true hater would have.     you have to look at differance making TD&#039;s vs. 1 yard plunges.   bubba Franks made a living catching the 1 yard 1st and goal TD pass from favre.  I could have caught it thasts the point.    In my opinion differance making TD&#039;s count.   The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.
If Peterson is 2nd in yards in teh NFC alone and we knwo what johnson did in tennessee how can you make a reasonable argument for Peterson being all-pro?    Though he showed measurable improvement in pass blocking he is still a liability in that department and he has ball security issues.   i just disagree with the selection.  by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jx4cmario1 says:<br />
January 14, 2010 1:22 PM<br />
Super- Let&#8217;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#8217;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#8217;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs&#8230;..you are obviously just a Viking hater.<br />
&#8212;<br />
Notice i didn&#8217;t mention anything about the other viking selections.  A true hater would have.     you have to look at differance making TD&#8217;s vs. 1 yard plunges.   bubba Franks made a living catching the 1 yard 1st and goal TD pass from favre.  I could have caught it thasts the point.    In my opinion differance making TD&#8217;s count.   The 1 yard plunges and catches off play fakes do not.<br />
If Peterson is 2nd in yards in teh NFC alone and we knwo what johnson did in tennessee how can you make a reasonable argument for Peterson being all-pro?    Though he showed measurable improvement in pass blocking he is still a liability in that department and he has ball security issues.   i just disagree with the selection.  by like us all i am a nobody and my opinion doesnt mean squat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CanadianVikingFan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CanadianVikingFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? No Vernon Davis, the dude was a beast this year. Oh ya, that&#039;s right. All ProBowl and All Pro teams are a joke.
Now, normally kickers don&#039;t matter for anything but really, David Akers? It should be Sebastian Janikowski as the 1st team kicker. The guy kicked a 61 yarder and missed less kicks. Oakland has him try and kick large amounts of kicks that shouldnt be attempted and he comes close or makes them. Oh and Ryan Longwell should get the 2nd team spot. He is automatic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? No Vernon Davis, the dude was a beast this year. Oh ya, that&#8217;s right. All ProBowl and All Pro teams are a joke.<br />
Now, normally kickers don&#8217;t matter for anything but really, David Akers? It should be Sebastian Janikowski as the 1st team kicker. The guy kicked a 61 yarder and missed less kicks. Oakland has him try and kick large amounts of kicks that shouldnt be attempted and he comes close or makes them. Oh and Ryan Longwell should get the 2nd team spot. He is automatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jx4cmario1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jx4cmario1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention he&#039;s in the top 3 in total yards in the NFL, lead the NFL in TDs, and had less carries than CJ, S Jax, and Thomas Jones, the top 3 rushers in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention he&#8217;s in the top 3 in total yards in the NFL, lead the NFL in TDs, and had less carries than CJ, S Jax, and Thomas Jones, the top 3 rushers in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packers4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packers4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is everyone in love with Steve Hutchinson this season? Last time I checked he was nowhere near as good as he has been in previous seasons. The running game has stalled for the Vikings this season and they have been getting torched within the last few games of the regular season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everyone in love with Steve Hutchinson this season? Last time I checked he was nowhere near as good as he has been in previous seasons. The running game has stalled for the Vikings this season and they have been getting torched within the last few games of the regular season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jx4cmario1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jx4cmario1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Super- Let&#039;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#039;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#039;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs.....you are obviously just a Viking hater.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super- Let&#8217;s not act like people on this site do not know football, I&#8217;m well aware ALL PRO means NFL wide, wise ass. But in one breath you say that being 2nd in the NFC in yards doesn&#8217;t mean anything, then discount him leading the NFL in TDs&#8230;..you are obviously just a Viking hater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notoroius B.U.G.</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notoroius B.U.G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Allied...&quot;Flat out sucked&quot;
C&#039;mon maaaaaaaaan.
This was by far his worst year of his short career, but dude, he did not flat out suck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Allied&#8230;&#8221;Flat out sucked&#8221;<br />
C&#8217;mon maaaaaaaaan.<br />
This was by far his worst year of his short career, but dude, he did not flat out suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supersuckers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supersuckers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jx4cmario1 says:
January 14, 2010 12:36 PM
Supersuckers says:
&quot;you are also in the minority regarding Peterson. He did not have a All pro year in most opinions.&quot;
---------------------------------
Hahahaha yea ok moron. 2nd in the NFC to S Jax in yards (by only 33 yds) and 1st in the NFL in touchdowns. You&#039;re right though, he&#039;s not all pro.
---
Another internet warrior.   You see son, the NFL All Pro award is not like the pro bowl.  it is league wide not devided into conferences.   2nd in the NFC in yards.  You said it all right there why he most share the opinion that he was not all-pro this year.   We havent even looked into the AFC yet.   Touchdowns?   take away the 1 yard 1st and 2nd and goal TD&#039;s to get te &quot;differance making&quot; number of productive touchdowns.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jx4cmario1 says:<br />
January 14, 2010 12:36 PM<br />
Supersuckers says:<br />
&#8220;you are also in the minority regarding Peterson. He did not have a All pro year in most opinions.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Hahahaha yea ok moron. 2nd in the NFC to S Jax in yards (by only 33 yds) and 1st in the NFL in touchdowns. You&#8217;re right though, he&#8217;s not all pro.<br />
&#8212;<br />
Another internet warrior.   You see son, the NFL All Pro award is not like the pro bowl.  it is league wide not devided into conferences.   2nd in the NFC in yards.  You said it all right there why he most share the opinion that he was not all-pro this year.   We havent even looked into the AFC yet.   Touchdowns?   take away the 1 yard 1st and 2nd and goal TD&#8217;s to get te &#8220;differance making&#8221; number of productive touchdowns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: downsouth49er</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429076</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[downsouth49er]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIP__21 says:
January 14, 2010 11:14 AM
&quot;How did Vernon Davis not make this list? And Welker over Fitz or Wayne?&quot;
This is the exact same thoughts I had after reading through that list.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP__21 says:<br />
January 14, 2010 11:14 AM<br />
&#8220;How did Vernon Davis not make this list? And Welker over Fitz or Wayne?&#8221;<br />
This is the exact same thoughts I had after reading through that list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdffa11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429075</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sdffa11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[how can you replace cole for mathis? mathis has freeney rushing from the other end spot. cole has no one else and has to face double and triple teams all the time, yet still ended up with 12 sacks. do you even watch the games before passing judgment?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how can you replace cole for mathis? mathis has freeney rushing from the other end spot. cole has no one else and has to face double and triple teams all the time, yet still ended up with 12 sacks. do you even watch the games before passing judgment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutumnWind999</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/01/14/your-2009-all-pro-team/#comment-429074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AutumnWind999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=70669#comment-429074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kaeding made 6 more FGs than Janikowski ... 16 of which came in extra-point territory (inside 30 yards). Seabass made more from 40+, 50+, 60+ and was better on kickoffs. Ridonkulous. I know Peter King voted for Seabass as his All-Pro kicker. At least one guy was paying attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaeding made 6 more FGs than Janikowski &#8230; 16 of which came in extra-point territory (inside 30 yards). Seabass made more from 40+, 50+, 60+ and was better on kickoffs. Ridonkulous. I know Peter King voted for Seabass as his All-Pro kicker. At least one guy was paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
