Comments on: Bears can still get Marshall, but it won't be easy

By: sullijo

sullijo — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:53:01 +0000

The Bears need to trade for a QB, not a WR.

By: shaggytoodle

shaggytoodle — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:51:08 +0000

Trade Olsen for Marshall, hell maybe even get Scheffler. Maybe the Bears could ask for your first rounder back, but they wouldn’t know what to do with it in the first place. Which is why it was so easy to part with them.

By: Rex Grossman

Rex Grossman — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:23:56 +0000

So it won’t happen, but Mike Florio would like to keep the story alive.

By: taudaddy79

taudaddy79 — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:11:24 +0000

This just in:
The Bears can get any player they want if some team will be willing to trade the player to them for a specified sum.

By: onesweetworld

onesweetworld — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:18:30 +0000

The Bears suck and have no idea how to build a winning team

By: D wins games

D wins games — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:10:07 +0000

Yawn! And there’s a chance it will snow in August too. Why not write about where Marshall might really go??

By: nfcbeast

nfcbeast — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:51:57 +0000

The Bears are more likely to get Westbrook….This Marshall talk is a bunch of hodge podge

By: Johnnyutah24

Johnnyutah24 — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:49:30 +0000

It doesn’t need to be a first round pick only. The bears could package say Hester and a third or even throw olsen into the deal if the broncos end up losing schefler. There are still plenty of ways of getting this done. If the bears trade olsen to the pats for a 2nd rounder then the bears can then use that to throw at the broncos as well as Hester or even another player.

By: mustbechris

mustbechris — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:35:19 +0000

so you’re saying there’s a chance?

By: midbloom

midbloom — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:29:31 +0000

the bears can offer their 1st rounder in 2011, if there is a 2011 season that is. but will the broncos bite?…

By: toonster

toonster — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:19:49 +0000

I just don’t buy the Bears-Marshall rumor for reasons I listed in the previous post.
a) Lack of picks.
b) Fit for system.
Actually, the Bears WR core’s abilities right now fit the Martz offense’s demand for quick receivers.
I think the Bears focus on addressing the D first before pondering the offense, with perhaps a DE/FS addition, with the names being rumored.

By: orcs12

orcs12 — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:18:54 +0000

We would take Marshall here in a heartbeat!
We have NEVER had a legitimate receiver! EVER!
Hell the same at the QB position! We love Jay… Don’t let anybody tell you anything different.
We have basically blew a** since 85 ( yeah that includes the 2005 fluke )…. BTW, how the hell did we make it to the Super Bowl in 2005? Really?

By: BaltimoreSports

BaltimoreSports — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:13:27 +0000

Marshall + Ravens = Superbowl Contenders

By: ChicagoJo

ChicagoJo — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:12:21 +0000

uh, so this huge ass post is mean to lend credence to the rumor you reported on earlier? even if he hit the open market without a tender, the Bears will not pursue Marshall. I’m not saying it’d be a bad move, I’m just saying the Bears won’t do it.

By: azbears

azbears — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:00:55 +0000

Chicago already has good recievers. I don’t think they need Marshall…But I would LOVE to see them hire Holt as a recievers coach

By: irishgary

irishgary — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:59:59 +0000

maybe they can trade there 2020 pick. It still won’t help, the Bears suck.

By: milehiclown

milehiclown — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:55:13 +0000

“Given that coach Josh McDaniels is carrying a 2-8 mark from the last ten games of his first season, the Broncos don’t need to have Cutler and Marshall ringing up hundreds of yards and 15 or more touchdowns.”
And those translated into how many playoff games? ZERO.
The Donks don’t care WHO gets him as long as he is out of the AFCWest