<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Curious developments in case against Roethlisberger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:50:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pensacolasteelers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pensacolasteelers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The irritating thing is I&#039;ve never defended Ben. I&#039;m defending a principle that you don&#039;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo.&quot;
EXACTLY!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The irritating thing is I&#8217;ve never defended Ben. I&#8217;m defending a principle that you don&#8217;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo.&#8221;<br />
EXACTLY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pensacolasteelers ...
Not quite sure about RebaT, but I think you&#039;re right about robhug71 not being a Steelers fan and just claiming it as a way to push our buttons. All this &quot;your boy Ben&quot; and &quot;your hero&quot; stuff--it&#039;s like talking to a schoolchild. It trivializes the discussion.
The irritating thing is I&#039;ve never defended Ben. I&#039;m defending a principle that you don&#039;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo. We still don&#039;t even know what the girl alleges he did. But I&#039;m confident, based on her statement and subsequent court filings, that he didn&#039;t rape Andrea McNulty. And since he&#039;s innocent of that sexual assault, it makes me seriously question the likelihood that he suddenly ran out and committed this one. I&#039;m still waiting to hear any evidence to suggest otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pensacolasteelers &#8230;<br />
Not quite sure about RebaT, but I think you&#8217;re right about robhug71 not being a Steelers fan and just claiming it as a way to push our buttons. All this &#8220;your boy Ben&#8221; and &#8220;your hero&#8221; stuff&#8211;it&#8217;s like talking to a schoolchild. It trivializes the discussion.<br />
The irritating thing is I&#8217;ve never defended Ben. I&#8217;m defending a principle that you don&#8217;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo. We still don&#8217;t even know what the girl alleges he did. But I&#8217;m confident, based on her statement and subsequent court filings, that he didn&#8217;t rape Andrea McNulty. And since he&#8217;s innocent of that sexual assault, it makes me seriously question the likelihood that he suddenly ran out and committed this one. I&#8217;m still waiting to hear any evidence to suggest otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pensacolasteelers ...
Not quite sure about RebaT, but I think you&#039;re right about robhug71 not being a Steelers fan and just claiming it as a way to push our buttons. All this &quot;your boy Ben&quot; and &quot;your hero&quot; stuff--it&#039;s like talking to a schoolchild. It trivializes the discussion.
The irritating thing is I&#039;ve never defended Ben. I&#039;m defending a principle that you don&#039;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo. We still don&#039;t even know what the girl alleges he did. But I&#039;m confident, based on her statement and subsequent court filings, that he didn&#039;t rape Andrea McNulty. And since he&#039;s innocent of that sexual assault, it makes me seriously question the likelihood that he suddenly ran out and committed this one. I&#039;m still waiting to hear any evidence to suggest otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pensacolasteelers &#8230;<br />
Not quite sure about RebaT, but I think you&#8217;re right about robhug71 not being a Steelers fan and just claiming it as a way to push our buttons. All this &#8220;your boy Ben&#8221; and &#8220;your hero&#8221; stuff&#8211;it&#8217;s like talking to a schoolchild. It trivializes the discussion.<br />
The irritating thing is I&#8217;ve never defended Ben. I&#8217;m defending a principle that you don&#8217;t railroad a man on gossip and innuendo. We still don&#8217;t even know what the girl alleges he did. But I&#8217;m confident, based on her statement and subsequent court filings, that he didn&#8217;t rape Andrea McNulty. And since he&#8217;s innocent of that sexual assault, it makes me seriously question the likelihood that he suddenly ran out and committed this one. I&#8217;m still waiting to hear any evidence to suggest otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pensacolasteelers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pensacolasteelers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deb they can say they&#039;re Steelers fans all they want but I don&#039;t believe them.
I will criticize Ben as much as anyone else and as loudly as I can IF and WHEN all the FACTS are laid out and he is CONVICTED. But unlike Rohbug and Reba, I am not going to convict or condemn him before then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb they can say they&#8217;re Steelers fans all they want but I don&#8217;t believe them.<br />
I will criticize Ben as much as anyone else and as loudly as I can IF and WHEN all the FACTS are laid out and he is CONVICTED. But unlike Rohbug and Reba, I am not going to convict or condemn him before then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@robhug71 ...
I don&#039;t know whether to be impressed that a kindergartner has access to a computer or furious at myself for repeatedly allowing him to engage me in conversation. You can&#039;t be adult about the discussion. You&#039;ve got to keep up this idiotic juvenile &quot;your hero&quot; and &quot;your boy Ben&quot; BS.
If you&#039;d been paying attention to my posts, you&#039;d know I don&#039;t need a nimwit like you to educate me in life, football, the Pittburgh Steelers, and certainly not in international politics.
None of us enjoys hearing the words &quot;Pittsburgh Steelers&quot; and &quot;sexual assault&quot; in the same sentence, you arrogant jackass. I&#039;m a rape survivor. Do you think I enjoy hearing those words in the same sentence? When I&#039;m trying to talk about things as serious as evidence and due process, do you think I enjoy having some monumental jerk keep up this juvenile &quot;your hero&quot; idiocy? As though, after what I&#039;ve been through, I&#039;m arguing on the basis of football hero worship???? Do you think I&#039;m 12?????
You are a freaking moron. And I have more than had my fill of you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robhug71 &#8230;<br />
I don&#8217;t know whether to be impressed that a kindergartner has access to a computer or furious at myself for repeatedly allowing him to engage me in conversation. You can&#8217;t be adult about the discussion. You&#8217;ve got to keep up this idiotic juvenile &#8220;your hero&#8221; and &#8220;your boy Ben&#8221; BS.<br />
If you&#8217;d been paying attention to my posts, you&#8217;d know I don&#8217;t need a nimwit like you to educate me in life, football, the Pittburgh Steelers, and certainly not in international politics.<br />
None of us enjoys hearing the words &#8220;Pittsburgh Steelers&#8221; and &#8220;sexual assault&#8221; in the same sentence, you arrogant jackass. I&#8217;m a rape survivor. Do you think I enjoy hearing those words in the same sentence? When I&#8217;m trying to talk about things as serious as evidence and due process, do you think I enjoy having some monumental jerk keep up this juvenile &#8220;your hero&#8221; idiocy? As though, after what I&#8217;ve been through, I&#8217;m arguing on the basis of football hero worship???? Do you think I&#8217;m 12?????<br />
You are a freaking moron. And I have more than had my fill of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhug71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robhug71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Steeler-lady: That&#039;s right. I made it up.
How about pulling yourself away from your computer long enough to discover new and refreshing insight into this matter. Deb&#039;s stale insight doesn&#039;t count.
My post was in answer to someone up the page who had wondered what Roethlisberger&#039;s BAC was. I was trying to provide what info I knew on that subject.
You people are so paranoid, it&#039;s pathetic.
I doubt if you know if a football is blown up or stuffed, yet you pretend to be rightious Steelers fans out to protect your beloved quarterback.
I&#039;m gonna tell you what I told Deb: Roethlisberger wouldn&#039;t piss on you if you were on fire. Roethlisberger is all about Roethlisberger.
If he truly cared about you, the Steelers organization or the NFL, he&#039;d keep his pants up in public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steeler-lady: That&#8217;s right. I made it up.<br />
How about pulling yourself away from your computer long enough to discover new and refreshing insight into this matter. Deb&#8217;s stale insight doesn&#8217;t count.<br />
My post was in answer to someone up the page who had wondered what Roethlisberger&#8217;s BAC was. I was trying to provide what info I knew on that subject.<br />
You people are so paranoid, it&#8217;s pathetic.<br />
I doubt if you know if a football is blown up or stuffed, yet you pretend to be rightious Steelers fans out to protect your beloved quarterback.<br />
I&#8217;m gonna tell you what I told Deb: Roethlisberger wouldn&#8217;t piss on you if you were on fire. Roethlisberger is all about Roethlisberger.<br />
If he truly cared about you, the Steelers organization or the NFL, he&#8217;d keep his pants up in public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhug71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robhug71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 20:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Deb ... The interesting thing about you going above and beyond to prove your hero innocent is this: He wouldn&#039;t piss on you if you were on fire.
They&#039;ve been playing professional football in Pittsburgh since 1933. Each and every season, someone has quarterbacked the team. That trend will continue, with or without Roethlisberger.
No one player is bigger than the organization. That&#039;s the way it&#039;s always been in Pittsburgh. I learned that in 1984, when they sent Franco Harris packing to Seattle.
If you are so convinced Roethlisberger is innocent of any wrongdoing, why are you always in such an uproar?
Dan Rooney is a presidential-appointed Ambassador to Ireland. I doubt very seriously if he enjoys hearing/reading the words ``the Pittsburgh Steelers&#039;&#039; and ``sexual assualt&#039;&#039; mentioned in the same sentence.
I know I&#039;ve had my fill of it; have ever since last year. If you enjoy the drama, great. Have at it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deb &#8230; The interesting thing about you going above and beyond to prove your hero innocent is this: He wouldn&#8217;t piss on you if you were on fire.<br />
They&#8217;ve been playing professional football in Pittsburgh since 1933. Each and every season, someone has quarterbacked the team. That trend will continue, with or without Roethlisberger.<br />
No one player is bigger than the organization. That&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s always been in Pittsburgh. I learned that in 1984, when they sent Franco Harris packing to Seattle.<br />
If you are so convinced Roethlisberger is innocent of any wrongdoing, why are you always in such an uproar?<br />
Dan Rooney is a presidential-appointed Ambassador to Ireland. I doubt very seriously if he enjoys hearing/reading the words &#8220;the Pittsburgh Steelers&#8221; and &#8220;sexual assualt&#8221; mentioned in the same sentence.<br />
I know I&#8217;ve had my fill of it; have ever since last year. If you enjoy the drama, great. Have at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pensacolasteelers ...
What&#039;s scaring me is that robhug71 and RebaT say they&#039;re Steelers fans, too.
Have you seen Scully &amp; Mulder? Something strange is going on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pensacolasteelers &#8230;<br />
What&#8217;s scaring me is that robhug71 and RebaT say they&#8217;re Steelers fans, too.<br />
Have you seen Scully &#038; Mulder? Something strange is going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pensacolasteelers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pensacolasteelers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh no!
Former state Sen. Nancy Schaefer and her husband found dead in their Georgia home. Maybe Roethlisberger did it? lmao
Steelers fans, I have been a Steelers fan for almost 40 years, I&#039;m just trying to show some of these idiots just how stupid they sound.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no!<br />
Former state Sen. Nancy Schaefer and her husband found dead in their Georgia home. Maybe Roethlisberger did it? lmao<br />
Steelers fans, I have been a Steelers fan for almost 40 years, I&#8217;m just trying to show some of these idiots just how stupid they sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@robhug71 ...
The illogic of that post makes me worry that you&#039;re skating close to RebaT in venomous obsession.
The guy spent an evening in a bar and had a buzz on. Isn&#039;t that to be expected? I no longer drink, but why consume alcohol if not to feel the effects of alcohol? Why not drink Coke?
Since I was over 18--no longer a minor regardless of legal drinking age--when I drank, it was my job to monitor what I consumed. If I overimbibed, that was MY responsibility.
I totally get that you think Roethlisberger is an overrated QB. I totally get that you think his off-field behavior is reckless and boorish. I don&#039;t get why you are so anxious to paint him as a sex offender that you are now finding fault with his non-drunkenness.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@robhug71 &#8230;<br />
The illogic of that post makes me worry that you&#8217;re skating close to RebaT in venomous obsession.<br />
The guy spent an evening in a bar and had a buzz on. Isn&#8217;t that to be expected? I no longer drink, but why consume alcohol if not to feel the effects of alcohol? Why not drink Coke?<br />
Since I was over 18&#8211;no longer a minor regardless of legal drinking age&#8211;when I drank, it was my job to monitor what I consumed. If I overimbibed, that was MY responsibility.<br />
I totally get that you think Roethlisberger is an overrated QB. I totally get that you think his off-field behavior is reckless and boorish. I don&#8217;t get why you are so anxious to paint him as a sex offender that you are now finding fault with his non-drunkenness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeler-lady</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeler-lady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol Rob  I watch this case closely.. and NEVER did i hear that.....
Lol Iknow alot of 21yr olds who could outdrink the average man.. so i wouldnt use that theory.
It really doesnt matter how many beers Ben did or didnt have... HES LEGAL to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol Rob  I watch this case closely.. and NEVER did i hear that&#8230;..<br />
Lol Iknow alot of 21yr olds who could outdrink the average man.. so i wouldnt use that theory.<br />
It really doesnt matter how many beers Ben did or didnt have&#8230; HES LEGAL to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhug71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robhug71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometime this week, bar manager Rocky Duncan was asked if Roethlisberger was drunk on the night in question. Duncan reportedly said: ``Was he the drunkest person in the bar? No. Did he have a buzz going? Yes.&#039;&#039;
Take that for what it&#039;s worth.
Do you know how many beers it takes to intoxicate a 6-5, 290-pound man? I&#039;m guessing probably a few more than it takes to intoxicate a 20-year-old coed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime this week, bar manager Rocky Duncan was asked if Roethlisberger was drunk on the night in question. Duncan reportedly said: &#8220;Was he the drunkest person in the bar? No. Did he have a buzz going? Yes.&#8221;<br />
Take that for what it&#8217;s worth.<br />
Do you know how many beers it takes to intoxicate a 6-5, 290-pound man? I&#8217;m guessing probably a few more than it takes to intoxicate a 20-year-old coed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeler-lady</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeler-lady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW look at this dyke GO..
Not one single report says Ben was drunk.. As a matter of fact a few stated he didnt even have a drink..one said he nursed a beer while watching a game on the tv...But you  sit here n claim he was drunk.. Its PROVEN she was drunk.. Even if Ben was drunk.. HES ALLOWED.. HES OVER 21!
Hey guys not ALL WOMEN are MONEY HUNGRY Bitches like Reba.. In a real STABLE marriage,its 50-50... You do for each other,and you dont hold things over each others heads. I guess thats just how some women have to live in life to get anything.
lmao this dumb bitch dont even know what happened.. the COPS didnt test her at all.. the hospital did.. and rightfully so.. shes UNDERAGE. They had no reason to test Ben.. he was in a club,over 21 and wasnt driving.. Why would they test him?
I see you like throwing around accusations...your such a damn hyprocrite too.. You got mad n turned me in to PFT becus I didnt buy into your BS about being drugged n sexual assulted.. (i see now thats just how you roll to get what you want) You said and I quote.. &quot; You wasnt there so you dont tell me what happened to me&quot; .. LOL Perhaps you should use the same theory when discussing Ben.
You wont do that tho ,becus you are nothing but a FEMINISTIC man Hating Bitch. Thats plain as day with your last post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW look at this dyke GO..<br />
Not one single report says Ben was drunk.. As a matter of fact a few stated he didnt even have a drink..one said he nursed a beer while watching a game on the tv&#8230;But you  sit here n claim he was drunk.. Its PROVEN she was drunk.. Even if Ben was drunk.. HES ALLOWED.. HES OVER 21!<br />
Hey guys not ALL WOMEN are MONEY HUNGRY Bitches like Reba.. In a real STABLE marriage,its 50-50&#8230; You do for each other,and you dont hold things over each others heads. I guess thats just how some women have to live in life to get anything.<br />
lmao this dumb bitch dont even know what happened.. the COPS didnt test her at all.. the hospital did.. and rightfully so.. shes UNDERAGE. They had no reason to test Ben.. he was in a club,over 21 and wasnt driving.. Why would they test him?<br />
I see you like throwing around accusations&#8230;your such a damn hyprocrite too.. You got mad n turned me in to PFT becus I didnt buy into your BS about being drugged n sexual assulted.. (i see now thats just how you roll to get what you want) You said and I quote.. &#8221; You wasnt there so you dont tell me what happened to me&#8221; .. LOL Perhaps you should use the same theory when discussing Ben.<br />
You wont do that tho ,becus you are nothing but a FEMINISTIC man Hating Bitch. Thats plain as day with your last post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebaT..</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RebaT..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spoonthis..
Ben needed a test if she took one.  Why are you men always one sided?  Just because you have a &quot;kick stand&quot; makes you superior? LOL  Women laugh at you too.  Women are in control here.  Look how your wife handles the money and the house.  You don&#039;t like it, you go without!  That just KILLS men.  Poor little thing and you give in like a lost puppy. HA HA HA HA HA
Ben was as drunk as she was.  OH NO, cops don&#039;t test when you give them 1000 on the spot and take a picture with them.
Here&#039;s a concept you pay for it on dates to achieve the goal.  You PAY FOR IT IN MARRIAGE even more.  Men are so STUPID but it&#039;s an advantage to us.  We control that part of the plan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoonthis..<br />
Ben needed a test if she took one.  Why are you men always one sided?  Just because you have a &#8220;kick stand&#8221; makes you superior? LOL  Women laugh at you too.  Women are in control here.  Look how your wife handles the money and the house.  You don&#8217;t like it, you go without!  That just KILLS men.  Poor little thing and you give in like a lost puppy. HA HA HA HA HA<br />
Ben was as drunk as she was.  OH NO, cops don&#8217;t test when you give them 1000 on the spot and take a picture with them.<br />
Here&#8217;s a concept you pay for it on dates to achieve the goal.  You PAY FOR IT IN MARRIAGE even more.  Men are so STUPID but it&#8217;s an advantage to us.  We control that part of the plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebaT..</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RebaT..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 02:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deb,
Did he actually pay the bill?  That&#039;s a first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb,<br />
Did he actually pay the bill?  That&#8217;s a first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Bigbluefan ...
Thanks for the info! Since my DVR once overwrote something I didn&#039;t want to lose (SBXLIII--which, thankfully, reran in its entirety on the NFL Network) that now makes sense.
The locals immediately called in the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. They&#039;ve handled this case from the start.
It was revealed when the recordings were first mentioned that there were no cameras in the VIP room where Ben &amp; co. were partying or in the bathroom area that serves the VIP room, where the alleged incident occurred. So even if the recordings had been preserved, they would have been of limited use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bigbluefan &#8230;<br />
Thanks for the info! Since my DVR once overwrote something I didn&#8217;t want to lose (SBXLIII&#8211;which, thankfully, reran in its entirety on the NFL Network) that now makes sense.<br />
The locals immediately called in the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. They&#8217;ve handled this case from the start.<br />
It was revealed when the recordings were first mentioned that there were no cameras in the VIP room where Ben &#038; co. were partying or in the bathroom area that serves the VIP room, where the alleged incident occurred. So even if the recordings had been preserved, they would have been of limited use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbluefan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigbluefan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me explain it to you who have no idea how a video system works
It is a Digital Video Recorder and when the hard drive is full it over writes it self it is not a tape it is a harddrive
The Keystone cops should have taken the footage they wanted off the machine this is not foul play this is how the machine is made to work.
Why do I know this I am in that business the machines can store as much as a few TB of video or as little as 100 GB I know to some 100 GB sounds like a lot but when your storing video from various cameras it goes fast in a bar very fast.  The systems are normally set to record on motion and in a bar that would all the time the place is open that would eat a harddrive very fast.
The cops should have burned a copy of the video then it would not have been over written of course it goes to show that this case should have been give to the State Cops not andy and barney]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me explain it to you who have no idea how a video system works<br />
It is a Digital Video Recorder and when the hard drive is full it over writes it self it is not a tape it is a harddrive<br />
The Keystone cops should have taken the footage they wanted off the machine this is not foul play this is how the machine is made to work.<br />
Why do I know this I am in that business the machines can store as much as a few TB of video or as little as 100 GB I know to some 100 GB sounds like a lot but when your storing video from various cameras it goes fast in a bar very fast.  The systems are normally set to record on motion and in a bar that would all the time the place is open that would eat a harddrive very fast.<br />
The cops should have burned a copy of the video then it would not have been over written of course it goes to show that this case should have been give to the State Cops not andy and barney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownsfansinceconcieved</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownsfansinceconcieved]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry! I meant to say a SEASON ENDING LOSS TO THE BROWNS. My bad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry! I meant to say a SEASON ENDING LOSS TO THE BROWNS. My bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jl ...
According to a March 14 article in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Roethlisberger and his friends had dinner that night at the Eenoco Japanese Steak &amp; Sushi restaurant a few miles from his home in the Reynolds Plantation resort.
A little after 9 p.m., he told Eenoco owner Heath Burton he was going to drive to Millegeville. &quot;He told me he&#039;d never been down there,&quot; Burton said. &quot;He&#039;s always a nice guy. Very sociable. But he doesn&#039;t like a lot of people hounding him. He comes in a few times a year and will bring his offensive line. They&#039;re great guys, too. We&#039;ve never had a problem with them.&quot;
He should have stayed at Eenoco.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jl &#8230;<br />
According to a March 14 article in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Roethlisberger and his friends had dinner that night at the Eenoco Japanese Steak &#038; Sushi restaurant a few miles from his home in the Reynolds Plantation resort.<br />
A little after 9 p.m., he told Eenoco owner Heath Burton he was going to drive to Millegeville. &#8220;He told me he&#8217;d never been down there,&#8221; Burton said. &#8220;He&#8217;s always a nice guy. Very sociable. But he doesn&#8217;t like a lot of people hounding him. He comes in a few times a year and will bring his offensive line. They&#8217;re great guys, too. We&#8217;ve never had a problem with them.&#8221;<br />
He should have stayed at Eenoco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownsfansinceconcieved</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownsfansinceconcieved]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is funny. I witnessed Ben get sacked 8 times in a loss to the browns and we traded both OUR QB&#039;S. Kudos to you Mike on such a provocative story. I&#039;ve been reading these hillarious comments for over 2hrs. and, if I may make a simple suggestion. Start running advertisement every 10 minutes (as seen on tv) you could retire on another story like this. buckfigben! Go Browns]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny. I witnessed Ben get sacked 8 times in a loss to the browns and we traded both OUR QB&#8217;S. Kudos to you Mike on such a provocative story. I&#8217;ve been reading these hillarious comments for over 2hrs. and, if I may make a simple suggestion. Start running advertisement every 10 minutes (as seen on tv) you could retire on another story like this. buckfigben! Go Browns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@tryagain ...
I may well have jumped on you unfairly. When this story first broke, most of the Steelers fans who commented condemned Ben&#039;s reckless, irresponsible behavior but cautioned that everyone needed to wait and let the evidence determine his guilt or innocence--pointing out that the evidence presented in Nevada refutes Andrea McNulty&#039;s accusations. But very few attacked the Georgia accuser with terms like &quot;slut.&quot; Of course, Florio&#039;s articles are designed to incite extreme comments from both factions, which then incite more comments, so the posts on both sides are getting dirtier.
Yes, I have been Patty Poster on this topic (she says with a wry smile). Neither the Nevada or Georgia allegations are comparable to my experience. However, obviously I have intense feelings on the subjects of sexual assault, false accusations, using rape as an extortion plot, and victimizing women by convincing them they bear no responsibility for taking care of themselves when they&#039;re drinking or that any unwanted touch by a man is an assault and they are helpless to respond. Throw in the emotions of having my team&#039;s QB as the accused and I&#039;ve become like a little dog chewing on a shoe I can&#039;t seem to release. So I get especially aggravated at the many hypocritical commenters who are simply using this situation as an excuse to rag on the Steelers while pretending a nobler cause.
Forgive me if I unfairly lumped you into that category.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tryagain &#8230;<br />
I may well have jumped on you unfairly. When this story first broke, most of the Steelers fans who commented condemned Ben&#8217;s reckless, irresponsible behavior but cautioned that everyone needed to wait and let the evidence determine his guilt or innocence&#8211;pointing out that the evidence presented in Nevada refutes Andrea McNulty&#8217;s accusations. But very few attacked the Georgia accuser with terms like &#8220;slut.&#8221; Of course, Florio&#8217;s articles are designed to incite extreme comments from both factions, which then incite more comments, so the posts on both sides are getting dirtier.<br />
Yes, I have been Patty Poster on this topic (she says with a wry smile). Neither the Nevada or Georgia allegations are comparable to my experience. However, obviously I have intense feelings on the subjects of sexual assault, false accusations, using rape as an extortion plot, and victimizing women by convincing them they bear no responsibility for taking care of themselves when they&#8217;re drinking or that any unwanted touch by a man is an assault and they are helpless to respond. Throw in the emotions of having my team&#8217;s QB as the accused and I&#8217;ve become like a little dog chewing on a shoe I can&#8217;t seem to release. So I get especially aggravated at the many hypocritical commenters who are simply using this situation as an excuse to rag on the Steelers while pretending a nobler cause.<br />
Forgive me if I unfairly lumped you into that category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been to Milledgeville multiple times. It&#039;s everything you would expect... and more! I just don&#039;t see why he was there. There are better golf courses up on in the Lake Oconee area and that&#039;s a very scenic area. Athens is closer and better bar scene. It&#039;s too far to drink and drive back and most of the people that are staying there are residents of the college or one of the prisons.
It certainly doesn&#039;t make him guilty. Although I would say, in Milledgeville, it&#039;s not hard to determine which are the college bars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been to Milledgeville multiple times. It&#8217;s everything you would expect&#8230; and more! I just don&#8217;t see why he was there. There are better golf courses up on in the Lake Oconee area and that&#8217;s a very scenic area. Athens is closer and better bar scene. It&#8217;s too far to drink and drive back and most of the people that are staying there are residents of the college or one of the prisons.<br />
It certainly doesn&#8217;t make him guilty. Although I would say, in Milledgeville, it&#8217;s not hard to determine which are the college bars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tryagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tryagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Deb says:
You, Chatty Cathy or Poster Patty, blather on more than I can even imagine or would desire to. I&#039;ve read what you&#039;ve written and I&#039;m sorry if you&#039;ve encountered something similar to what Ben is being accused of here. Ben may or may not be guilty, I&#039;m not saying which is correct because I do not know.  But neither do the Steeler fans.
I&#039;m sorry (not really) if you are offended because I get offended by the ignorant, vile, repulsive, etc. crap written by your fellow Steeler fans who seem to have no regard for the truth or justice, they simply want their quarterback regardless of what the truth may be.
And for the record, I truly have never had any animosity towards the Steelers or Steeler fans until this incident. In fact, when this first blew up and Florio made some comment in a post (maybe in the title) about Steeler fans and their blind love (or to that effect) I made a comment saying that I didn&#039;t see that at all from what I had read at that point. However, I guess after reading a few thousand times how the girl is a slut, was drunk, pretty much got whatever she deserved, is a gold digger, etc. etc. etc. I do get disgusted. Sorry (again, not really), I just can&#039;t help but think what if that was me or one of my friends or family members and they had been assaulted and were treated (or even viewed) this way. If Ben&#039;s not guilty until proven otherwise, why doesn&#039;t she get the same treatment? You can reply and mention all the other comments claiming his guilt, they are equally denying due process, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s okay to just trash the girl without merit either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Deb says:<br />
You, Chatty Cathy or Poster Patty, blather on more than I can even imagine or would desire to. I&#8217;ve read what you&#8217;ve written and I&#8217;m sorry if you&#8217;ve encountered something similar to what Ben is being accused of here. Ben may or may not be guilty, I&#8217;m not saying which is correct because I do not know.  But neither do the Steeler fans.<br />
I&#8217;m sorry (not really) if you are offended because I get offended by the ignorant, vile, repulsive, etc. crap written by your fellow Steeler fans who seem to have no regard for the truth or justice, they simply want their quarterback regardless of what the truth may be.<br />
And for the record, I truly have never had any animosity towards the Steelers or Steeler fans until this incident. In fact, when this first blew up and Florio made some comment in a post (maybe in the title) about Steeler fans and their blind love (or to that effect) I made a comment saying that I didn&#8217;t see that at all from what I had read at that point. However, I guess after reading a few thousand times how the girl is a slut, was drunk, pretty much got whatever she deserved, is a gold digger, etc. etc. etc. I do get disgusted. Sorry (again, not really), I just can&#8217;t help but think what if that was me or one of my friends or family members and they had been assaulted and were treated (or even viewed) this way. If Ben&#8217;s not guilty until proven otherwise, why doesn&#8217;t she get the same treatment? You can reply and mention all the other comments claiming his guilt, they are equally denying due process, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s okay to just trash the girl without merit either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christxn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christxn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Same old story! They&#039;re rich and successful so they can&#039;t rape anyone. Kobe, Ben.... And their fans defend them to the end. If it were my QB acting this way I would be the first one to call for both his heads. C&#039;mon people. Get a spine and get some morals. Require respectable behavior of those you support with your words and with your hard earned fan dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same old story! They&#8217;re rich and successful so they can&#8217;t rape anyone. Kobe, Ben&#8230;. And their fans defend them to the end. If it were my QB acting this way I would be the first one to call for both his heads. C&#8217;mon people. Get a spine and get some morals. Require respectable behavior of those you support with your words and with your hard earned fan dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeler-lady</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeler-lady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julie... do college bars have signs out front stating it?? Cus if you go into a town you dont frequent how is one to know what college bar is which?
So are there bars for late 20yr olds....30s 40s? Im curious....Do only college people go to these bars? Last time I checked theres people in college of all ages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie&#8230; do college bars have signs out front stating it?? Cus if you go into a town you dont frequent how is one to know what college bar is which?<br />
So are there bars for late 20yr olds&#8230;.30s 40s? Im curious&#8230;.Do only college people go to these bars? Last time I checked theres people in college of all ages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamson64</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamson64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something stinks is that right Florio. Do you have anything else? Classless]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something stinks is that right Florio. Do you have anything else? Classless</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar in Miami Beach</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oscar in Miami Beach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another woman looking for gold.With Ben&#039;s reputation any woman would think she can get away with a thing like this.The one in Tahoe and now this one.This is going to be another case like the No. Carolina students that were accused by a stripper.All famous people are exposed to these unscrupulous vixens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another woman looking for gold.With Ben&#8217;s reputation any woman would think she can get away with a thing like this.The one in Tahoe and now this one.This is going to be another case like the No. Carolina students that were accused by a stripper.All famous people are exposed to these unscrupulous vixens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cprine</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cprine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m beginning to think that you&#039;re incompetent.
I did report that Ben Roethlisberger&#039;s attorney told us that his client would provide DNA to investigators.  I was the first to do so.
I also was the first to report that GBI later called the attorney to tell him that Roethlisberger didn&#039;t need to submit it because there was no genetic material recovered at the crime scene or on the alleged victim.
I&#039;ve also reported that the attorney had been told about a high blood alcohol content allegedly recorded concerning the accuser.  This, as I mentioned, was corroborated by two other sources close to the investigation that are independent of Mr Cansino.
How is this unusual?  This is the scutwork of reporting, not of bloviating about stories you apparently can&#039;t read, much less write.
The stories are plain on their face.  You are the one who has been extrapolating notions that can&#039;t be backed up by basic reporting.  I have reached no opinions in this case about the innocence or guilt of any party.
I take the facts as they come, corroborate them with independent sources, and put a name to them.  If you want to trash me and my work, that&#039;s cool.
But don&#039;t you have to understand the rudiments of the story, how it is reported or why it matters before you hold forth with opinions of dubious value?
Carl Prine]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think that you&#8217;re incompetent.<br />
I did report that Ben Roethlisberger&#8217;s attorney told us that his client would provide DNA to investigators.  I was the first to do so.<br />
I also was the first to report that GBI later called the attorney to tell him that Roethlisberger didn&#8217;t need to submit it because there was no genetic material recovered at the crime scene or on the alleged victim.<br />
I&#8217;ve also reported that the attorney had been told about a high blood alcohol content allegedly recorded concerning the accuser.  This, as I mentioned, was corroborated by two other sources close to the investigation that are independent of Mr Cansino.<br />
How is this unusual?  This is the scutwork of reporting, not of bloviating about stories you apparently can&#8217;t read, much less write.<br />
The stories are plain on their face.  You are the one who has been extrapolating notions that can&#8217;t be backed up by basic reporting.  I have reached no opinions in this case about the innocence or guilt of any party.<br />
I take the facts as they come, corroborate them with independent sources, and put a name to them.  If you want to trash me and my work, that&#8217;s cool.<br />
But don&#8217;t you have to understand the rudiments of the story, how it is reported or why it matters before you hold forth with opinions of dubious value?<br />
Carl Prine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@julieinduvall ...
You&#039;re don&#039;t have the smarts I&#039;ve been crediting you with, do you? If you did, you could keep this discussion on a serious, adult level.
1. Ben Roethlisberger isn&#039;t my hero. Are you 12?
2. The only person who has said the Georgia authorities want to speak to the Nevada accuser is her lawyer. His agenda is to make her seem credible. He also said he would not let her speak to them. If she had been raped and knowing he cannot go to prison in her case, then why wouldn&#039;t she want to assist the Georgia authorities with a case that could result in jail time? If she had been raped, she would want to see him punished more than she would want his money.
3. When her attorney (Calvin Dunlap) announced that they wanted to speak with her, I e-mailed my brother and asked why. He was in the middle of a case, but shot back this brief reply:
&quot;I&#039;m not sure if Georgia&#039;s rules of evidence are based on the federal rules, the model rules or something else all together.  But, there are only two reasons they would want to talk to McNulty: (1) to use her testimony against Ben; (2) to see if she can give them anything to support this girl--in other words, they might be questioning the girl&#039;s story and want to see if it matches McNulty&#039;s.
If it is (2), then either, they decide that there is no similarity and that gives them more concern; they decide there is similarity and that confirms their concerns (i.e., both golddiggers); or they decide there is similarity and it confirms this girl&#039;s accusations.  If that&#039;s it, then they decide if they want to try to get McNulty to testify which takes us to (1).
If you get to (1), the federal rules specifically allow the introduction of the defendant&#039;s commission of another offense or offenses of a sexual assault to be considered for bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.  This is contrary to the rules on all other crimes or acts.  And, when combined with the rule that prohibits the introduction of the alleged victim&#039;s relevant acts in these types of cases (which I&#039;m sure Georgia has), create an uneven playing field.&quot;
4. I did not say &quot;hugging on him all night&quot; was &quot;highly sexualized behavior.&quot; Nor was I speaking of the Georgia case at that point. I was speaking in hypotheticals. You might work on your reading comprehension skills--try moving your dripping sarcasm out of the way.
5. This woman&#039;s allegation and version of events has not been released. We do not know what she said or what occurred. You are making it up as you go.
6. Don&#039;t reinterpret me &quot;in other words.&quot; I said EXACTLY what I meant to say and made it perfectly clear. I was talking about rape law in general--something that concerns me as a real rape survivor rather than as a shrieking hypocrite on a blog feigning concern for rape victims as a way to get in digs about a football team.
You are what I thought you were: someone with an agenda who knows nothing about the facts of this case or the Nevada case and is using rape for her own ends. Careful, julie. What goes around, comes around. One day you may get a lesson in what it&#039;s like to face a real attacker.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@julieinduvall &#8230;<br />
You&#8217;re don&#8217;t have the smarts I&#8217;ve been crediting you with, do you? If you did, you could keep this discussion on a serious, adult level.<br />
1. Ben Roethlisberger isn&#8217;t my hero. Are you 12?<br />
2. The only person who has said the Georgia authorities want to speak to the Nevada accuser is her lawyer. His agenda is to make her seem credible. He also said he would not let her speak to them. If she had been raped and knowing he cannot go to prison in her case, then why wouldn&#8217;t she want to assist the Georgia authorities with a case that could result in jail time? If she had been raped, she would want to see him punished more than she would want his money.<br />
3. When her attorney (Calvin Dunlap) announced that they wanted to speak with her, I e-mailed my brother and asked why. He was in the middle of a case, but shot back this brief reply:<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;m not sure if Georgia&#8217;s rules of evidence are based on the federal rules, the model rules or something else all together.  But, there are only two reasons they would want to talk to McNulty: (1) to use her testimony against Ben; (2) to see if she can give them anything to support this girl&#8211;in other words, they might be questioning the girl&#8217;s story and want to see if it matches McNulty&#8217;s.<br />
If it is (2), then either, they decide that there is no similarity and that gives them more concern; they decide there is similarity and that confirms their concerns (i.e., both golddiggers); or they decide there is similarity and it confirms this girl&#8217;s accusations.  If that&#8217;s it, then they decide if they want to try to get McNulty to testify which takes us to (1).<br />
If you get to (1), the federal rules specifically allow the introduction of the defendant&#8217;s commission of another offense or offenses of a sexual assault to be considered for bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.  This is contrary to the rules on all other crimes or acts.  And, when combined with the rule that prohibits the introduction of the alleged victim&#8217;s relevant acts in these types of cases (which I&#8217;m sure Georgia has), create an uneven playing field.&#8221;<br />
4. I did not say &#8220;hugging on him all night&#8221; was &#8220;highly sexualized behavior.&#8221; Nor was I speaking of the Georgia case at that point. I was speaking in hypotheticals. You might work on your reading comprehension skills&#8211;try moving your dripping sarcasm out of the way.<br />
5. This woman&#8217;s allegation and version of events has not been released. We do not know what she said or what occurred. You are making it up as you go.<br />
6. Don&#8217;t reinterpret me &#8220;in other words.&#8221; I said EXACTLY what I meant to say and made it perfectly clear. I was talking about rape law in general&#8211;something that concerns me as a real rape survivor rather than as a shrieking hypocrite on a blog feigning concern for rape victims as a way to get in digs about a football team.<br />
You are what I thought you were: someone with an agenda who knows nothing about the facts of this case or the Nevada case and is using rape for her own ends. Careful, julie. What goes around, comes around. One day you may get a lesson in what it&#8217;s like to face a real attacker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RebaT..</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/25/curious-developments-in-case-against-roethlisberger/#comment-528727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RebaT..]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=73897#comment-528727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not Reba in disquise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Reba in disquise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
