Skip to content

Availability of franchise tag for 2011 is unclear

If Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb, signed through 2010, is traded to a new team without a contract extension, his new team would be able to retain his rights for 2011 via the franchise tag, right?

Possibly.

The final answer depends on the interpretation of Article XX, Section 1 of the current CBA.  Here’s the full text:   “Except as set forth in Section 10 below, each Club shall be permitted to designate one of its players who would otherwise be an Unrestricted Free Agent as a Franchise Player each season during the term of this Agreement. The player so designated may be one who would otherwise be a Restricted Free Agent.  Except as set forth in Section 2(a)(i) below, any Club that designates a Franchise Player shall be the only Club with which such Franchise Player may negotiate or sign a Player Contract, during the period the player is so designated, notwithstanding the number of his Accrued Seasons.  The period for Clubs to designate Franchise Players will begin on the twenty-second day preceding the first day of the new League Year and will end at 4:00 p.m. New York time on the eighth day preceding the first day of the new League Year.”

Here’s what it potentially means:  Since the CBA doesn’t expire until March 2011 and since the deadline for designating franchise players expires in February 2011, before the CBA ends, the franchise designation may be used for the 2011 season.

The key language, arguably capable of multiple interpretations, is this:  “[E]ach Club shall be permitted to designate one of its players who would otherwise be an Unrestricted Free agent as a Franchise Player each season during the term of this Agreement.”  (Emphasis added.)

The league, which declined to provide its position on this matter beyond merely citing Article XX, Section 1 as the operative clause, would likely argue that, because the deadline for use of the tag in 2011 applies “during the term of this Agreement,” franchise tags are available for 2011.  The union, which has not yet responded to our request for its own position regarding this issue, likely would claim that the qualifier “each season” makes the franchise tag inapplicable during 2011, since 2011 is not a season that falls within the “term of this Agreement.”

It’s yet another high-stakes battle that will be waged between labor and management over the coming year — and it’s an important factor that any team interested in trading for McNabb needs to keep in mind, if he declines to sign a new contract.

Permalink 8 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Buffalo Bills, Oakland Raiders, Philadelphia Eagles, Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories, Union
8 Responses to “Availability of franchise tag for 2011 is unclear”
  1. DaOneWhoKnows says: Mar 28, 2010 8:17 AM

    About this whole McNabb trade thing… Did anyone ever think this was a “smoke screen” to move Kevin Kolb to the Rams for the #1 overall pick? I mean, looking at the “tea leaves”: Management on both the Rams and the Eagles are quitely defending McNabb rumors which could be detracting from the actual player they really have in mind in making a deal for…
    Just a thought… What’s your opinion?

  2. aec4 says: Mar 28, 2010 8:18 AM

    couldn’t a team use them in Feb 2011, and they would expire in March 2011 because the agreement expires?

  3. crispy_bacon says: Mar 28, 2010 10:19 AM

    I actually created an account just to tell DaOneWhoKnows no, and that he’s an idiot.

  4. doubldipp says: Mar 28, 2010 10:32 AM

    don’t be surprised if Kolb is traded not Mcnabb, Reid has a history of making a average backup look good. Feeley, Garcia.

  5. Burnum says: Mar 28, 2010 10:38 AM

    No way any team would give away the #1 OVR pick for an average guy like Kolb.

  6. snnyjcbs says: Mar 28, 2010 12:13 PM

    Wow, all the teams that will have big name players becoming Free Agents are screwed by what you write and looks like players will be free from all over the League. There are a bunch of teams with players going to be FA next year.

  7. LAEaglefan says: Mar 28, 2010 2:03 PM

    “Reid has the history of making an average backup look good”
    Does the name Mike McMahon ring a bell?

  8. P-way Eagles says: Mar 28, 2010 4:13 PM

    Not only would the eagles not be able to get the #1 overall pick for Kolb, they wouldnt want it. A huge contract for an unproven player, no thanks.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!