Comments on: Redskins, Haynesworth are suddenly playing chicken

By: Dapollock

Dapollock — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:31:16 +0000

If they really want him to pay back the bonus, tell him he’s the new strong safety or punter.

By: smiley

smiley — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:31:16 +0000

The game is on…..NT or trade big boy? This is Shanahan’s team. Hail!

By: MotorCityKitties

MotorCityKitties — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:30:15 +0000

Fat Albert almost spit out his bologna sandwich when he read this. He doesn’t want to be in DC, he misses the BBQ in Memphis.

By: Elwood-Blues

Elwood-Blues — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:29:39 +0000

Those comments by ESPN reporters are not contradictory.
Just because the team is “not determined to trade” Albert does not mean that the team isn’t “willing to trade” him. I don’t see what you are fishing for here.

By: Topher

Topher — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:27:46 +0000

In order to have contradictory reports the reports need to contradict.
The following is true in every report:
The Redskins are willing, even eager to trade Haynesworth if certain conditions are met but are content to keep him on their roster if those conditions are not met.

By: raider_from_az

raider_from_az — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:06:44 +0000

@Cleg shanahan is a tool. the only reason the redskins might succeed is bruce allen. but shanahan will be there to take all the credit im sure

By: filthymcnasty

filthymcnasty — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:04:46 +0000

Butterworth is gonna eat dat chicken.
HAIL SUCKAS.

By: owumd

owumd — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:03:50 +0000

If Clayton says “the Skins are willing to part with Haynesworth” and Schefter says “the Skins aren’t determined to deal Haynesworth” that isn’t a contradiction. How can a lawyer be so terrible at parsing the nuance of a sentence?

By: jasncondit

jasncondit — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:03:14 +0000

Report — Albert Haynesworth just agreed to stay with the team after he heard the words “Chicken” and ate his fill at the team’s kitchen.

By: OtisDelmas13

OtisDelmas13 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:00:21 +0000

@irishgary
You are an angry little man huh?
Never a positive comment about any team mentioned on PFT.
Are all ND fans as whiny and sour as you are?

By: Slack jawed Yokel

Slack jawed Yokel — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:54:16 +0000

Let this fat boy go! Get me some picks! Albert is a window licker!

By: LionSunBlock

LionSunBlock — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:54:11 +0000

Hey Albert, Jim Schwartz would love to have you in a Lions’ uniform. Give us a call!

By: Bucfs

Bucfs — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:49:11 +0000

I’d like to the see the Bucs make a run at him
D-Line: Stylez G. White-Haynesworth-McCoy/Suh-(Brown?)
Bucs could pick up Haynesworth, draft another D-tackle (either suh or mccoy) and pick up that Brown dude thats supposed to meet on thursday
We can do this bucs! upgrade the line!
remember parethesis (however relevant) are unnecessary

By: irishgary

irishgary — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:47:57 +0000

I signed a $100 million dollar contract, but I don’t want to play where you want me too. Screw the team, I’m fat Albert.
Another great signing Danny boy.

By: gldnboot13

gldnboot13 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:44:29 +0000

Why does every ESPN analyst have to agree on a rumor? Every reporter has his/her sources. That’s why you have multiple reporters who can go after a story from multiple angles. To say that ESPN needs to harmonize their reports is absurd and just means they’d be manipulating the sports public even more than people already accuse them of. I say let each reporter do their job and try to track down the best information possible. Don’t always point out potential biases with every story as a way to degrade a reporter and just give your own opinion on the story. Or hell, get your own quotes so you don’t have to degrade other reporters who actually seem to be going out and getting information rather than making up rumors.

By: Cleg

Cleg — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:42:20 +0000

I am liking Shannahan more and more.

By: Chapnasty2

Chapnasty2 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:41:55 +0000

It is nearly 4 hours since I have been keeping track….. this is the second post about skins/eagles that provides no new news or insight.

By: wryly1

wryly1 — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:39:47 +0000

Too often, Schefter’s ‘sources’ are players agents who have a very one-sided and self serving agenda – which is why he often has to eat his words.

By: Mooch

Mooch — Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:35:22 +0000

Cue DMac Excuse #211
“McNabb would have won the Super Bowl in Washington if only he had a defense.”
McNabb, the only “HOF QB” who needs the best team in the history of the league to win a title.
He’s Boomer Esiason 2.0.