Jamar Williams heads to Carolina in deal for Harris

So the unofficial Chris Harris trade is now official, according to the Chicago Sun-Times and the Chicago Tribune.

Harris will re-join the Bears, almost certainly as a starter. Linebacker Jamar Williams heads to Carolina.  Williams will add depth on the weak side for the Panthers with Thomas Davis recovering from a torn ACL.  He could potentially compete to start on the strong side with James Anderson and Dan Connor.

Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks tackles (long week) in a game he started for Lance Briggs.  He was a restricted free agent, which is one reason the Bears were willing to move him.

51 responses to “Jamar Williams heads to Carolina in deal for Harris

  1. Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs. He was a restricted free agent, which is one reason the Bears were willing to move him.
    _____________________
    Wow, 20 sacks, that has to be a record or something.

  2. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs”
    Yeah, that would be a good game.

  3. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs.”
    Must have been against the Packers…
    PS – Gregg, when will you start proofreading before posting?

  4. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs. ”
    How do I not remember that game?

  5. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs”
    that HAS to be a record..because I think 22 sacks for a season is the record. So 20 in one game must be a record. Wow…I hope he got player of the game that day.

  6. Jamar Williams recorded 20 SACKS in a game? Do you guys read through these stories before you post them?

  7. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game”
    Wow, 20 sacks would be a career year for most people Greg. Maybe you meant tackles.
    Looks like a good move for the Bears: trade from depth and get starting help.

  8. Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs.
    That’s a decent game.

  9. Seeing how I have never heard of this guy i find it hard to believe he recorded 20 sacks in ONE game

  10. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs”
    WOW 20 sacks in one game! now thats a record!
    Time to proofread boys

  11. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs.”
    Sounds an amazing game 😉

  12. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs.”
    That’s gotta be some kind of record!

  13. “Williams had some decent moments last year, recording 20 sacks in a game he started for Lance Briggs. He was a restricted free agent, which is one reason the Bears were willing to move him.”
    wow, 20 sacks in one game. That must be a record

  14. Eventhough I know you mean 20 tackles, how would they trade a guy who had 20 sacks in 1 game. Thats beyond a proofreading error, man you SUCK!!!

  15. Excellent. We were going to lose Williams as a free agent anyways so might as well get a starting safety in exchange.
    Now just trade for an O line while also signing Atogwe and we are set…

  16. if it gets up to 100 consecutive posts saying ‘wow, 20 sacks in a game’, does that mean next article gets proofread? I do more proofreading in day to day emails than some of these posts, and thats kind of sad.

  17. Derrrrr, 20 sacks! derrrrrr!!!!
    Everyone above that commented about there being 20 sacks in a game is a total idiot.
    Obviously a typo…the best part was that every response was dumber and dumber, just like anyone living in the south.

  18. Hell, 20 sacks is nothing for a lot of the Vikings players.
    During the game, before the game, after the game–it doesn’t matter.
    And by “sacks” I mean the NUT variety.
    In their mouths.

  19. Why would they trade some guy who had 20 sacks in a game? He is a one man defense. 2 more sacks and he’d have the record for the season. If he has that kind of talent why was he riding the bench? With skills like that they should have traded Urlacher.
    Worst trade ever!

  20. LOL Love it. 67 posts ALREADY because of sacks vs tackles.
    20 sacks? Is he the Waterboy?

  21. Not one damn intelligent comment in the whole section, You a** clowns can’t figure out what he meant. I was hoping to read some real feed back the subject. Like why trade a top SS for a backup LB

  22. Why yes!!!! Here is Peyton Manning for Brady Quinn!!!!!! WHOOOOOO!!!!
    Is being a Panthers fan now what it was like to be a Cardinals fan for their first 80 years of existence?

  23. # jimicos says: April 27, 2010 4:19 PM
    Jenna Jameson once had 20 sacks in a day.
    ——————-
    LOL
    comment of the day by far

  24. a no name and no draft picks for chris harris?!? ridiculously bad trade for carolina. can’t believe they’re trading the hitman for a guy i’ve never heard of. by far the worst off-season move carolina has made this year….why in the freakin world would they send him back to chicago!!??

  25. If there are any Panther fans out there with the last name of Harris that want to buy a nice authentic black jersey number , I can sell you one cheap.
    Purchased last year, only worn a few times.

  26. this is a steal for the Bears. That “20 tackle” game was actually 18, and it was against the Rams.
    Fact is, the Bears lost 2 of their 3 starting LB’s for the season before halftime of Week 1, and Williams only started 3 games. He had an opportunity to step in and take a spot from Hunter Hillenmeyer and Nick Roach. Those guys aren’t exactly Butkus and Singletary.
    I’ve been bitching about the lack of any presence in the secondary for 2 years and this move is way better than I figured they were capable of making.

  27. Dewey Axewoond says:
    April 27, 2010 4:27 PM
    Hell, 20 sacks is nothing for a lot of the Vikings players.
    During the game, before the game, after the game–it doesn’t matter.
    And by “sacks” I mean the NUT variety.
    In their mouths.
    ================================
    It’s refreshing to know that you will disappear by week 3 of the season. Just like you have done for 2 years in a row now.
    your post sounds like the ravings of either a jealous man, or you really know all about sacks in the mouth. What time is your shift at the glory hole over Dewey?

Leave a Reply