<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McDaniels plans to have a lot of No. 1 receivers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon St. Randy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon St. Randy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 02:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WR is still not the issue in Denver. Too many question marks on defense to focus on the offense. Free agent signings in the offseason will make or break the Broncos season this year....
But D. Thomas was in a completely different system in college, there&#039;s no way we&#039;ll know what kind of NFL WR he&#039;ll be. Gaffney had a good game against the Chiefs, but so did the entire KC offense. They won&#039;t be able to win shootouts with the porous D we&#039;ve come to expect. Really wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Denver shocks the league and earns a playoff berth, or if they tank and sniff the butts of the entire league. Stop trying to analyze a team that&#039;s still analyzing itself.
Huck it, Chuck it, Football.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WR is still not the issue in Denver. Too many question marks on defense to focus on the offense. Free agent signings in the offseason will make or break the Broncos season this year&#8230;.<br />
But D. Thomas was in a completely different system in college, there&#8217;s no way we&#8217;ll know what kind of NFL WR he&#8217;ll be. Gaffney had a good game against the Chiefs, but so did the entire KC offense. They won&#8217;t be able to win shootouts with the porous D we&#8217;ve come to expect. Really wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Denver shocks the league and earns a playoff berth, or if they tank and sniff the butts of the entire league. Stop trying to analyze a team that&#8217;s still analyzing itself.<br />
Huck it, Chuck it, Football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deeb0NYC</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deeb0NYC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 01:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What most media people dont understand is the scheme of this offense. This leads to the public developing an inference about the broncos or macdaniels. This is a team game. You do not need a number 1 receiver in this offense.  Any receiver can line up at any spots and be the number &quot;1,2,3&quot; receiver. Its all about matchups and not being predictable. its all about running a combination of routes that exploits weakness in the opposing defender or defense. Example of this proof is the Patriots offense when they won their superbowls. They did not have a &quot;1&quot; receiver. Team concept.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What most media people dont understand is the scheme of this offense. This leads to the public developing an inference about the broncos or macdaniels. This is a team game. You do not need a number 1 receiver in this offense.  Any receiver can line up at any spots and be the number &#8220;1,2,3&#8243; receiver. Its all about matchups and not being predictable. its all about running a combination of routes that exploits weakness in the opposing defender or defense. Example of this proof is the Patriots offense when they won their superbowls. They did not have a &#8220;1&#8243; receiver. Team concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert ethen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert ethen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DeMaryius Thomas may be the most physically gifted player in this draft. 4.38 speed at 6-3.5, 230 pounds. Also one of the smartest. 34 on the Wonderlic. Top notch character and he is a good blocker already. Broncos made a lot of noise about Dez Bryant, but obviously this was the guy they wanted all along. I think he will be the best player to come out of this draft, along with Tim Tebow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeMaryius Thomas may be the most physically gifted player in this draft. 4.38 speed at 6-3.5, 230 pounds. Also one of the smartest. 34 on the Wonderlic. Top notch character and he is a good blocker already. Broncos made a lot of noise about Dez Bryant, but obviously this was the guy they wanted all along. I think he will be the best player to come out of this draft, along with Tim Tebow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgy1957</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edgy1957]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 18:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bious says:
The Broncos are going to miss BM as their main target
How many times did he make catches that just shouldn&#039;t have been caught?
Without that guy, Orton is going to regress badly
**************************
Here&#039;s the funny thing about that statement: according to Football Outsiders, the guy who benefitted the most has been Brandon Marshall. All of his numbers were up SIGNIFICANTLY with Orton than they were with Cutler.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bious says:<br />
The Broncos are going to miss BM as their main target<br />
How many times did he make catches that just shouldn&#8217;t have been caught?<br />
Without that guy, Orton is going to regress badly<br />
**************************<br />
Here&#8217;s the funny thing about that statement: according to Football Outsiders, the guy who benefitted the most has been Brandon Marshall. All of his numbers were up SIGNIFICANTLY with Orton than they were with Cutler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bious</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627619</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Broncos are going to miss BM as their main target
How many times did he make catches that just shouldn&#039;t have been caught?
Without that guy, Orton is going to regress badly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Broncos are going to miss BM as their main target<br />
How many times did he make catches that just shouldn&#8217;t have been caught?<br />
Without that guy, Orton is going to regress badly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoxVagina</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VoxVagina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ robert ethen
You have to realize this was with Pro Bowlers Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall.  Cutler had the arm and accuracy to get it to Royal, who was usually open when Marshall was double teamed.  Royal benefitted from having a great receiver across from him.  It will be very tough to put up those numbers without a better QB or #1 WR, though he has potential]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ robert ethen<br />
You have to realize this was with Pro Bowlers Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall.  Cutler had the arm and accuracy to get it to Royal, who was usually open when Marshall was double teamed.  Royal benefitted from having a great receiver across from him.  It will be very tough to put up those numbers without a better QB or #1 WR, though he has potential</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Black Cat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Black Cat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coincidentally, he&#039;s also hoping to have several #1 QBs thoughout the year...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, he&#8217;s also hoping to have several #1 QBs thoughout the year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Auz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McD is a bad-ass.  Not sure where all the hate is coming from, the guy has already revolutionized the game with his bad-assery.  What other coach gets a team fired-up on National T.V.?  McD and the Bronco beasts are looking to whip some mother-fu*king-ass while winning mother-fu*king-games.  He knows what he is doing.  Look for the Bronco&#039;s to be a powerhouse in the NFL.  There are a lot of good teams in the NFL and the Broncos are about to be a good football team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McD is a bad-ass.  Not sure where all the hate is coming from, the guy has already revolutionized the game with his bad-assery.  What other coach gets a team fired-up on National T.V.?  McD and the Bronco beasts are looking to whip some mother-fu*king-ass while winning mother-fu*king-games.  He knows what he is doing.  Look for the Bronco&#8217;s to be a powerhouse in the NFL.  There are a lot of good teams in the NFL and the Broncos are about to be a good football team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brewster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brewster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#  shaslers says:  May 25, 2010 1:05 PM
You know what you call someone who is one of your three #1 receivers?
A #3 receiver.
_________________
A very funny comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  shaslers says:  May 25, 2010 1:05 PM<br />
You know what you call someone who is one of your three #1 receivers?<br />
A #3 receiver.<br />
_________________<br />
A very funny comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefloater</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thefloater]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Soon we will hear about McDaniels plan to unleash his squadron of 4th string QBs upon the NFL!!! Fear Coach McHoodypants!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soon we will hear about McDaniels plan to unleash his squadron of 4th string QBs upon the NFL!!! Fear Coach McHoodypants!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolcopter</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lolcopter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The broncos lost every game that Marshall had 100+ receiving
he is a big loss, but not the entire team. WRs are a dime a dozen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The broncos lost every game that Marshall had 100+ receiving<br />
he is a big loss, but not the entire team. WRs are a dime a dozen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patpatriotagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patpatriotagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 15:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[shanahan drafted a bunch of talented &quot;upside&quot; guys who were headaches. cleaning up takes a lot of work]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shanahan drafted a bunch of talented &#8220;upside&#8221; guys who were headaches. cleaning up takes a lot of work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IV:XXMileHigh</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IV:XXMileHigh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[myeaglescantwin-
You&#039;re a douche! You need to learn how to form sentences before you call anyone &quot;undereducated&quot;. I believe you meant prima donna not Pre-Madona, and why would anyone want to get along with a petulant, temperamental person anyways? &quot;No one&quot; is two words and every team in the league had game footage on the Bronx after game one, genius. Damn, they grow &#039;em stupid in Phili, don&#039;t they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>myeaglescantwin-<br />
You&#8217;re a douche! You need to learn how to form sentences before you call anyone &#8220;undereducated&#8221;. I believe you meant prima donna not Pre-Madona, and why would anyone want to get along with a petulant, temperamental person anyways? &#8220;No one&#8221; is two words and every team in the league had game footage on the Bronx after game one, genius. Damn, they grow &#8216;em stupid in Phili, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spliffbunker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spliffbunker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CleanSlaton says: May 25, 2010 12:41 PM
Poor Broncos fans. If any of you decide to expatriate yourselves until the McDaniels-era of Broncos football is over, there&#039;s plenty of room on the Texans&#039; bandwagon. Gary Kubiak, Rick Smith, [formerly] Alex Gibbs, and David Gibbs were with the Elway superbowl teams...come down and sit on the Texans bandwagon with these familiar faces. Ahhhhhh, feels just like home.
Poor, poor Broncos fans. Don&#039;t worry though, the rest of the world hates Josh McDaniels too.
...........................................
you forgot Rick Dennison who might have been a very good choice to replace Shanahan
week 16 should be the game of the year for a true Broncos fan...the final home game of the season &amp; should the Broncos be in free-fall again it could be a very angry crowd
I really hope McD proves me wrong but I think we are looking at 4-12 to 6-10 ...win or lose here I wish the Texans ( since 2006 ) &amp; Redskins well this year]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CleanSlaton says: May 25, 2010 12:41 PM<br />
Poor Broncos fans. If any of you decide to expatriate yourselves until the McDaniels-era of Broncos football is over, there&#8217;s plenty of room on the Texans&#8217; bandwagon. Gary Kubiak, Rick Smith, [formerly] Alex Gibbs, and David Gibbs were with the Elway superbowl teams&#8230;come down and sit on the Texans bandwagon with these familiar faces. Ahhhhhh, feels just like home.<br />
Poor, poor Broncos fans. Don&#8217;t worry though, the rest of the world hates Josh McDaniels too.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
you forgot Rick Dennison who might have been a very good choice to replace Shanahan<br />
week 16 should be the game of the year for a true Broncos fan&#8230;the final home game of the season &#038; should the Broncos be in free-fall again it could be a very angry crowd<br />
I really hope McD proves me wrong but I think we are looking at 4-12 to 6-10 &#8230;win or lose here I wish the Texans ( since 2006 ) &#038; Redskins well this year</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownsfn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownsfn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[is Josh McDaniels a Ruh-Tard?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is Josh McDaniels a Ruh-Tard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Perro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Perro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really clean slaton?? Join the Texans bandwagon?? Haha, ok you guys have your 1st winning season and by just one game over .500.. No thanks buddy boy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really clean slaton?? Join the Texans bandwagon?? Haha, ok you guys have your 1st winning season and by just one game over .500.. No thanks buddy boy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerf32</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[acerf32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall was responsible for Bronco wins????
Did you know he had a bunch of 100 yard games..... none of which we won.
So, good game for Marshall=loss for team.
You people seem to have no clue for why the broncos were and weren&#039;t successfull last season. We lost Ryan Harris and Chris Kuper on OL. Would have needed a mobile qb to survive after that (week 7). Then our Defense could no longer stop the run with gimmick blitzes and teams exploited our sub-par D-line. These things have been rectified and we now have depth.
What McD is saying is the defense will dictate who is the primary target (definition of #1 reciever). Plenty of teams have won the Super Bowl without a #1 reciever. And if you Giant fans want to bring up Plaxico, I&#039;ll remind you it wasn&#039;t him that made that do or die catch. Also, how many times is the #1 reciever the MVP of the SB??? I can&#039;t remember. Anybody?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall was responsible for Bronco wins????<br />
Did you know he had a bunch of 100 yard games&#8230;.. none of which we won.<br />
So, good game for Marshall=loss for team.<br />
You people seem to have no clue for why the broncos were and weren&#8217;t successfull last season. We lost Ryan Harris and Chris Kuper on OL. Would have needed a mobile qb to survive after that (week 7). Then our Defense could no longer stop the run with gimmick blitzes and teams exploited our sub-par D-line. These things have been rectified and we now have depth.<br />
What McD is saying is the defense will dictate who is the primary target (definition of #1 reciever). Plenty of teams have won the Super Bowl without a #1 reciever. And if you Giant fans want to bring up Plaxico, I&#8217;ll remind you it wasn&#8217;t him that made that do or die catch. Also, how many times is the #1 reciever the MVP of the SB??? I can&#8217;t remember. Anybody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BroncoBourque</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BroncoBourque]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@GW
Clearly your reading comprehension needs work.  You will notice that he said in Marshall&#039;s absence, meaning when Marshall did not play.  In the only game that Marshall did not play, Gaffney had 14 receptions for 213 yards.  That&#039;s more yards than Marshall has ever had in a game and more reception than all but 2 game.   I would say that is going off in Marshall&#039;s absence but maybe you think that is just expected performance from Gaffney.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GW<br />
Clearly your reading comprehension needs work.  You will notice that he said in Marshall&#8217;s absence, meaning when Marshall did not play.  In the only game that Marshall did not play, Gaffney had 14 receptions for 213 yards.  That&#8217;s more yards than Marshall has ever had in a game and more reception than all but 2 game.   I would say that is going off in Marshall&#8217;s absence but maybe you think that is just expected performance from Gaffney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZombieRevolution</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ZombieRevolution]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Any other probowl caliber players that Joshhy wants to run out of town???&quot;
Not sure if he is going to come close to pulling it off, but he is looking more for team players than ego guys and guys with off-field baggage, like lying about an accident and failing to tell their new team they needed surgery.  Most Bronco fans are ready to dump this guyinto deep water- what if he suceeds?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any other probowl caliber players that Joshhy wants to run out of town???&#8221;<br />
Not sure if he is going to come close to pulling it off, but he is looking more for team players than ego guys and guys with off-field baggage, like lying about an accident and failing to tell their new team they needed surgery.  Most Bronco fans are ready to dump this guyinto deep water- what if he suceeds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GirthyOne</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GirthyOne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belichick Is God says:
May 25, 2010 12:45 PM
The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.
=========================================
They had very talented 1st and 2nd round draft picks up and down both sides of the line.  Denver just lost their stud in Clady.  Finishing 2-8 last year, does not make this team look like it&#039;s heading in the right direction and that was with the very talented Marshall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belichick Is God says:<br />
May 25, 2010 12:45 PM<br />
The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.<br />
=========================================<br />
They had very talented 1st and 2nd round draft picks up and down both sides of the line.  Denver just lost their stud in Clady.  Finishing 2-8 last year, does not make this team look like it&#8217;s heading in the right direction and that was with the very talented Marshall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgy1957</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[edgy1957]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon Marshall did pretty good in his career but let&#039;s face facts: he was a 4th round pick out of Central Florida that had 1 ok season and 1 outstanding season in 4 years. He didn&#039;t exactly wow everyone his rookie year and last year after he was benched, Gaffney came in and had 14 catches for 213 yards.
Thomas did well in 3 seasons at Tech and when you consider the offense that he was in, he did damn good. 3 SOLID seasons and while he may not get 100, he can still do more than what Marshall did as a rookie.
The bigger problem is QB. Are they going to screw with Orton&#039;s head and let him dangle or are they going to do the right thing and let him know that the job is his and let him move on. I know that they brought in Quinn but seriously, he&#039;ll just screw it up like he did in Cleveland. It&#039;s best to go with Orton, keep Quinn around in case an injury happens and groom Tebow for the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon Marshall did pretty good in his career but let&#8217;s face facts: he was a 4th round pick out of Central Florida that had 1 ok season and 1 outstanding season in 4 years. He didn&#8217;t exactly wow everyone his rookie year and last year after he was benched, Gaffney came in and had 14 catches for 213 yards.<br />
Thomas did well in 3 seasons at Tech and when you consider the offense that he was in, he did damn good. 3 SOLID seasons and while he may not get 100, he can still do more than what Marshall did as a rookie.<br />
The bigger problem is QB. Are they going to screw with Orton&#8217;s head and let him dangle or are they going to do the right thing and let him know that the job is his and let him move on. I know that they brought in Quinn but seriously, he&#8217;ll just screw it up like he did in Cleveland. It&#8217;s best to go with Orton, keep Quinn around in case an injury happens and groom Tebow for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Midway Monster</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midway Monster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;McDaniels plans to have a lot of No. 1 receivers&#039;
This should also read:
McDaniels plans to have a lot of No. 1 quarterbacks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;McDaniels plans to have a lot of No. 1 receivers&#8217;<br />
This should also read:<br />
McDaniels plans to have a lot of No. 1 quarterbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaslers</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shaslers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know what you call someone who is one of your three #1 receivers?
A #3 receiver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what you call someone who is one of your three #1 receivers?<br />
A #3 receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BABRonx</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BABRonx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoever thinks that McDaniel&#039;s won&#039;t be coaching the Broncos for a long time better get their head examined. He is a good coach putting in a great system which will make him a great coach in 3 years....and then....all of you idiots will be saying, I told you so!!!!! Not all of his choices have been taken well to say the least....but really, Jay Cutler, he look&#039;d great last year, Marshall???? he dropped way to many, now he has the money....it will be a burger king bag next time. Good Job McD!!!!! get rid of the trash.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever thinks that McDaniel&#8217;s won&#8217;t be coaching the Broncos for a long time better get their head examined. He is a good coach putting in a great system which will make him a great coach in 3 years&#8230;.and then&#8230;.all of you idiots will be saying, I told you so!!!!! Not all of his choices have been taken well to say the least&#8230;.but really, Jay Cutler, he look&#8217;d great last year, Marshall???? he dropped way to many, now he has the money&#8230;.it will be a burger king bag next time. Good Job McD!!!!! get rid of the trash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Stretch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big Stretch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@#  Belichick Is God says:  May 25, 2010 12:45 PM
The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.
-----------------------------------------------------
Kyle Orton / Tim TeBlow are not even close to being Tom Brady.
Josh McDaniels has 34 years and 3 Superbowl rings to go before he is Bellichick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#  Belichick Is God says:  May 25, 2010 12:45 PM<br />
The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Kyle Orton / Tim TeBlow are not even close to being Tom Brady.<br />
Josh McDaniels has 34 years and 3 Superbowl rings to go before he is Bellichick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: promichael</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[promichael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure that unloading a talented Quarterback and then very talented wide receiver is the best way to build a team. He got draft picks but unless those guys become stars his moves could lead to a short stay in Denver. The Denver Broncos did not make the playoffs and if they again miss the post season, Josh may be kissing Denver goodby. If Josh does not win the owner will be questioning weather he hired to big a personality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that unloading a talented Quarterback and then very talented wide receiver is the best way to build a team. He got draft picks but unless those guys become stars his moves could lead to a short stay in Denver. The Denver Broncos did not make the playoffs and if they again miss the post season, Josh may be kissing Denver goodby. If Josh does not win the owner will be questioning weather he hired to big a personality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_snrub</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr_snrub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s naive to think you&#039;re going to get anything close to Marshall&#039;s production from a rookie wide receiver even if he was the first one drafted.
Speaking of Demaryius, the guy is going to be a huge bust.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s naive to think you&#8217;re going to get anything close to Marshall&#8217;s production from a rookie wide receiver even if he was the first one drafted.<br />
Speaking of Demaryius, the guy is going to be a huge bust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert ethen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627596</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert ethen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eddie Royal had almost  100 catches as a rookie.
Jabbar Gaffney had 14 the one game he replaced Marshall. DeMaryius Thomas and Ed Decker both come in more highly rated than Marshall was as a rookie. Steve Spurrier thought that Kenny McKinley was a better receiver than Sidney Rice. So it&#039;s possible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie Royal had almost  100 catches as a rookie.<br />
Jabbar Gaffney had 14 the one game he replaced Marshall. DeMaryius Thomas and Ed Decker both come in more highly rated than Marshall was as a rookie. Steve Spurrier thought that Kenny McKinley was a better receiver than Sidney Rice. So it&#8217;s possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belichick Is God</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belichick Is God]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Patrots won their three super bowls without any superstar clear-cut #1 diva wide receivers: Givens, Patten, Branch, Troy Brown, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LIONPRIDE</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/05/25/mcdaniels-plans-to-have-a-lot-of-no-1-receivers/#comment-627594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LIONPRIDE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=76507#comment-627594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They traded away two of there most talented catchers and plan on replacing them with scrubs .... good luck with that! The only reason Denver got as many wins as they had last year was because of Marshall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They traded away two of there most talented catchers and plan on replacing them with scrubs &#8230;. good luck with that! The only reason Denver got as many wins as they had last year was because of Marshall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
