Comments on: D.A. to get Brandon Underwood case on Tuesday

By: Oz

Oz — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:25:53 +0000

So that’s where Viking fans come from….

By: TheDPR

TheDPR — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:18:13 +0000

I’m usually on the victim’s side in things like this but it really doesn’t appear that the women are the victims here. How can multiple women be raped by one unarmed guy (presumably at a party with a lot of people around) and mistake it for being raped by multiple perpetrators? The story doesn’t make sense.
My guess is Underwood brought in some paid Hos against the advice of his teammates (that’s why they’re pissed at him) and then there was some sort of dispute either about pay or performance.
But we may never know the whole truth for certain.

By: southernboi727

southernboi727 — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:42:15 +0000

This kind of stuff must be prevalent in many NFL cities if this kind of stupid stuff happens in Green Bay. So funny this comes out of Green Bay. Sounds like something more likely to happen in Tampa Bay than Green Bay. GO BUCS!!!!!!!!!!!

By: DPT

DPT — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:28:11 +0000

Cut him and Johnny Jolly, not worth the headaches.

By: Randomjim

Randomjim — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:15:27 +0000

Viking players with whores-Outrage
Packer players with whores-..mmm that’s O.K.
Jimmy you are an ass, but stating that is like telling everyone the sun sets in the west.

By: JimmySmith

JimmySmith — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:31:10 +0000

I have always maintained that nobody had all the facts so its hard to make blanket statememets like the Viking fans have tried to do. It only makes you sound like an idiot, something that seems to come naturally to most Viking fans.
But the suggestion that these were prostitutes from Milwaukee makes the rest of the story logical . Not that whores can’t be raped (where else do Viking fans come from?), but Underwood’s own admission that he had sexual contact and their story that they were held down by more than one person and the later changed to rape by one guy reminds me of the Duke Lacrosse rape charges, constantly changing and without any substantial evidence to back it up.

By: FoF

FoF — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:35:28 +0000

From precious thread: “You mean there are actual fans of Ted Thompson?”
Yes, Wisconsin is full of those sheep. For some reason, unlike any other fan base in the country, about 50% of Packer fans will throw any player, past, present, or future, under the bus if it will save a little face for Ted Thompson.

By: FoF

FoF — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:30:12 +0000

thugish rugish Packers!

By: itolduso

itolduso — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:13:40 +0000

it sounds 2 me like he wont have any charges brought against him! these bitches r just out 2 get him!!!! and possibly even his money too.

By: Contra

Contra — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:13:04 +0000

DCViking says:
June 7, 2010 6:44 PM
He could very well be innocent of anything, but I find it interesting that his teammate(s) seemed so outspoken in their implication that he was a problem.
Wonder how bad he has to be before he is cut simply because his teammates dislike him…
————
I dont know. Based on the reaction of his teammates and how fast they threw him under the bus it appears that the teammates know what really went on and simply want to walk away as quickly as possible. With that being said it appears some dirty work went on with Underwood.

By: Vikefanman

Vikefanman — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:08:00 +0000

Even as a Viking fan this whole story stinks. Police get a call at 3am about a sexual assult…when they arrive, everyone, including the women are still there….most of the guys are drinking….. the only guy missing UNDERWOOD is in the other room with both women. Sounds to me like the Ho’s thought his check was going to bounce.

By: bluestree

bluestree — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:06:33 +0000

I’m sure they’ve reamed him pretty good over this. Maybe the kid will wake up, but you can see he’s on thin ice.

By: GoBrowns19

GoBrowns19 — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:04:07 +0000

From pro bowl quarterback in 2007, to lawyer for a thug…wow.

By: Fonetik

Fonetik — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:03:55 +0000

Can somebody tell me why a person’s guilt needs to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in order to put them behind bars, but not to take millions of dollars from them? Don’t make no damn sense to me.

By: jerseykingpin

jerseykingpin — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:56:34 +0000

What no thanks for sending you the story

By: Johnnyb612

Johnnyb612 — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:56:24 +0000

From what Leroy Butler said on the radio, he believes these were prostitutes from Milwaukee that underwood hired for his own amusement. After he did what he was going to do, they ended up robbing the dude in his sleep, and then went to the police crying rape. I don’t know if this is the case, but it would probably explain the huge difference in their stories.

By: murray22

murray22 — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:52:32 +0000

He’s at least guilty of being stupid. He might not be charged given the lack of credibility of the witnesses, but he has some serious apologizing to do to his team mates, coaches and fans. Either he learns from this and cleans up his act, or he will be gone. It doesn’t sound like his fellow Packers were too happy with him for getting them involved in this. The worst part is that his coaches were talking him up before this incident, saying he had shown big improvement going into year two. Underwood has good potential as a player, but now we have to wonder where his head is at. What was he doing with those drunk cougars?
Maybe Underwood should be traded to the Vikings, so that he can go on the Love Boat.
Go Pack!

By: robert ethen

robert ethen — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:52:24 +0000

It would be comical if it wasn’t so funny.

By: DCViking

DCViking — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:44:06 +0000

He could very well be innocent of anything, but I find it interesting that his teammate(s) seemed so outspoken in their implication that he was a problem.
Wonder how bad he has to be before he is cut simply because his teammates dislike him…

By: lebowski

lebowski — Mon, 07 Jun 2010 18:30:33 +0000

Skanks… can’t live with ‘em, can’t live without ‘em.