Skip to content

Charles Woodson says he hasn't asked for a new contract

On Tuesday, Josina Anderson of FOX 31 in Denver seemed to report that the Packers and cornerback Charles Woodson are negotiating a new contract.

Woodson has responded.

The 2009 NFL defensive player of the year told ESPNMilwaukee.com via text, “I don’t know any Josina, and I haven’t discussed
anything with the Packers.”

Woodson, 34, has three year left on his current deal.  Per ESPNMilwaukee.com, he’s due to earn $7.5 million in 2010.  His base salary for 2011 moves to $5.5 million.  The following season, he completes his commitment with $6.5 million in base pay.

It’s unknown whether Woodson would like to discuss anything with the Packers.  Or, for that matter, get to know any Josina.

Permalink 34 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Green Bay Packers, Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
34 Responses to “Charles Woodson says he hasn't asked for a new contract”
  1. nerd says: Jun 10, 2010 8:08 PM

    Just agents playing games, “leaking” stuff to reporters. They might guarantee more of his money. Big deal.

  2. Charisma says: Jun 10, 2010 8:09 PM

    Come on Florio, I asked for something this time. You know Contra and Pervy and all the others who are jealous of what the Packers have as a team and organization that would love to respond to you.

  3. T. says: Jun 10, 2010 8:31 PM

    Josina Anderson still tryin’ to make a name for herself by makin’ up shit out in Denver? Whatever.
    Like the man said, I don’t know any Josina.

  4. Stewart says: Jun 10, 2010 8:54 PM

    WTB real stories plz

  5. Pervy Harvin says: Jun 10, 2010 9:05 PM

    Like all aging Packers looking for a last shot at a Superbowl,Mr. Woodcock will try to find his way to the Vikings. Too bad we don’t have a roster spot in the D back field for a senior citizen….last year was his last good year. Remember I said it!

  6. Tsinakis311 says: Jun 10, 2010 10:04 PM

    The entire Packer organization is terrible. It is filled with rapists and drug dealers. Worst run franchise in professional sports. From top to bottom absolutely the worst!!!!!!

  7. Emoney says: Jun 10, 2010 11:04 PM

    It’s nice to know Charles will retire a packer. And its amazing how an idiot in Denver makes up rumors about a player in green bay.

  8. Revolution22 says: Jun 10, 2010 11:18 PM

    Stick with the Broncos Rumor Mill, “Josina” They most likely need you more than we ever will. I’m looking foward to seeing the #21 jersey in the Packers HoF, and hopefully in Canton someday. He desrves it.

  9. PckrFnInMinn says: Jun 10, 2010 11:25 PM

    lol, Pervy…. the Vikings defensive backfield is a joke and they would be lucky to have a player of WoodSONS caliber. Funny how the Vikings do seem to take a lot of Packer re-treads… for every Brett Favre there is a Robert Ferguson.

  10. sukit says: Jun 10, 2010 11:28 PM

    Pervy- remember I said this queens will lose the division this year to the Packers. With an o line the queens and Jared Allen won’t stand a chance.

  11. GBPackers says: Jun 10, 2010 11:35 PM

    # Pervy Harvin says: June 10, 2010 9:05 PM
    Like all aging Packers looking for a last shot at a Superbowl,Mr. Woodcock will try to find his way to the Vikings. Too bad we don’t have a roster spot in the D back field for a senior citizen….last year was his last good year. Remember I said it!
    ====================================
    LOL! You are really going out on a limb there buddy. Saying a 34 year old corner coming of a DPOY is going to decline the following year!! Of course he isnt going to have as good of a year as last year! That would be incredibly wrong to expect a player to do THAT GREAT year in and year out!

  12. bvan says: Jun 11, 2010 12:21 AM

    Is it time to count trophies AGAIN?

  13. steve grogan says: Jun 11, 2010 1:45 AM

    Charles needs a DUI before playing for the Vikes, team rule.

  14. packers4life says: Jun 11, 2010 1:56 AM

    “Too bad we don’t have a roster spot in the D back field for a senior citizen.”
    There is a little someone named Antoine Winfield, dumbass.

  15. packers4life says: Jun 11, 2010 2:00 AM

    I bet Viking ‘fans’ can’t come up with anything else to insult Wisconsin with instead of the the old “women in Wisconsin are fat and ugly’ rant.
    “The entire Packer organization is terrible. It is filled with rapists and drug dealers. Worst run franchise in professional sports. From top to bottom absolutely the worst!!!!!!”
    Copy and paste much? It’s no surprise though. Viking ‘fans’ don’t have the intelligence to think of something else better to say. That and pure laziness which is typical of any Viking ‘fan’.

  16. turk yary says: Jun 11, 2010 2:12 AM

    Child Please, sounds like you didn’t get laid when you visited Wisconsin. Or maybe you spent a night in jail there? Nice ebonics comment, you fu%&ing bigot. Are you a Jew-hater, too? ASSHOLE.

  17. Love_Boat_Scandal says: Jun 11, 2010 5:16 AM

    bvan says:
    June 11, 2010 12:21 AM
    Is it time to count trophies AGAIN?
    ———————-
    Yes. Let’s see here. NFL Championships. Ah, yes, here it is. Packers=12. Vikings=0.

  18. Pervy Harvin says: Jun 11, 2010 6:53 AM

    You all fear Chilly!!!

  19. PULL&SEAL says: Jun 11, 2010 7:19 AM

    Not only do Viking fans have a severe inferiority complex, they’re scared $hitless by the Pack.

  20. JimmySmith says: Jun 11, 2010 7:26 AM

    Woodson, Defensive Player of the Year, 2009.
    To all the Viking fans, when he gets older and slows down to the point where the Packers can’t use him, we will let you know, then you can sign him.

  21. PULL&SEAL says: Jun 11, 2010 8:04 AM

    Pervy Harvin says:
    June 11, 2010 6:53 AM
    You all fear Chilly!!!
    Fear Chilly? The Packers are 5-3 versus that chump. 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12, looks good! go get em guys!!

  22. Ambrose says: Jun 11, 2010 9:44 AM

    RC IV says:
    June 11, 2010 8:35 AM
    Pathetic posters, no argument or comment related to the story, so lets bring out the old standby………..
    ———————————————–
    Talk about old standbys….do you also include the pathetic posters that continue to repeat incessantly their contention that the women are fatter, education is worse, most fans are toothless, and everyone is supposedly subjected to some idiomatic (look it up) gay “thing.” Do you mean those guys…who somehow think that if they repeat something often enough it becomes true? Them?

  23. Hornung's Tumbler says: Jun 11, 2010 10:00 AM

    Great to see RCIV show her lack of logic around these parts again. You talk about not winning a championship this decade. Well, how about not winning one in four chances overall? The only Queen that gets the Packer fan respect now is Tarkenton. At least he had the balls to called out that aging media/glory whore Favre.
    Mark my words. Favre comes back this year. They lose in the playoffs again. Favre will sign a one year deal to play in 2011 then. Queens will bring back Moss in 2011. It’ll be one more race around the Roller Dome before they move to LA. This time GB will sweep them.
    And Pervy, you must be a moron. Antoine Winfield and Pat Williams of the Williams Sisters are in the back half of their 30’s.
    Yeah, we fear Chilly alright. Really fear a guy who cannot stand up to his players and is the biggest pussy/pushover in the NFL. He’ll be coaching in the UFL in no time. He only caters to Favre to save his own ass.
    Child Please…..Minny does have some good looking women there. Never had a problem when I used to make the trek back in the day. Maybe that’s cause all you tools in the state are gnarly looking trolls.

  24. RC IV says: Jun 11, 2010 10:45 AM

    Hornung’s Tumbler says:
    June 11, 2010 10:00 AM
    Great to see RCIV show her lack of logic around these parts again. You talk about not winning a championship this decade. Well, how about not winning one in four chances overall? The only Queen that gets the Packer fan respect now is Tarkenton. At least he had the balls to called out that aging media/glory whore Favre.
    ===============================
    Turd:
    What do you want? Yes, your team has a better history than ours. Now what?
    The fact that you have to brag about 42 years and older trophies speaks volumes. Yes, at least you have them, but they haven’t won anything going on 15 years, it’s not like they have been dominate lately!
    Trust me bocephus, nobody, Viking player or fan cares if you respect any Vikings players, the only reason you like him is because he’s a whiny bitch just like you.
    He’s also stuck in the 60’s 70’s just like you and your Glory years.
    Welcome to 2010, 1967 doesn’t mean much anymore.
    Maybe you should get ahold of Doc Brown and some plutonium huh? You love living in the past, why dont you find a wormhole and go back?

  25. RC IV says: Jun 11, 2010 10:46 AM

    Hornung’s Tumbler says:
    June 11, 2010 10:00 AM
    Great to see RCIV show her lack of logic around these parts again. You talk about not winning a championship this decade. Well, how about not winning one in four chances overall? The only Queen that gets the Packer fan respect now is Tarkenton. At least he had the balls to called out that aging media/glory whore Favre.
    ===============================
    Turd:
    What do you want? Yes, your team has a better history than ours. Now what?
    The fact that you have to brag about 42 years and older trophies speaks volumes. Yes, at least you have them, but they haven’t won anything going on 15 years, it’s not like they have been dominate lately!
    Trust me bocephus, nobody, Viking player or fan cares if you respect any Vikings players, the only reason you like him is because he’s a whiny bitch just like you.
    He’s also stuck in the 60’s 70’s just like you and your Glory years.
    Welcome to 2010, 1967 doesn’t mean much anymore.
    Maybe you should get ahold of Doc Brown and some plutonium huh? You love living in the past, why dont you find a wormhole and go back?

  26. Calistin says: Jun 11, 2010 11:02 AM

    @tsinakiss311
    “The entire Packer organization is terrible. It is filled with rapists and drug dealers. Worst run franchise in professional sports. From top to bottom absolutely the worst!!!!!!”
    Probably why they have a waiting list longer than the stadiums capacity, and have plenty of revenue for improvements and updates.
    Could say something about the Metrodump, or how Minn can’t pony up for a new stadium. Or how the Vikings end up with the Packers leftovers year after year. Or how your team has won nothing, and let’s put this in a time frame, EVER!!
    Jealous Viking fans are funny.
    Enjoy LA, you should go with the team, I hear it’s nice.

  27. packers4life says: Jun 11, 2010 3:05 PM

    “Do you knows you any Brett Favre whipping your a$$es twice last year?”
    It’s funny how Viking ‘fans’ always say Packer fans need to stop bringing up the past but yet those same loser Viking ‘fans’ keep bringing up the two games against the Packers LAST year. If I recall, that counts as the past as well. Damn hyprocrites.

  28. Pervy Harvin says: Jun 11, 2010 3:37 PM

    RC IV says: The huge difference here is what Allen said was plainly tongue in cheek.
    Woodson talks “ghetto” because he and others like him think its cool(pervy even moreso)
    ===================================
    I talk as plain as English as any on this site. Ghetto RC??? You been hanging with Super too long! LOL

  29. footballrulz says: Jun 11, 2010 4:16 PM

    Calistin
    tsinakiss admitted in another thread that this is just a cut n paste troll post dome in every Packers thread. Evidently tired of the Jimmy Smith’s & Bob Nelson;s of the world. Wouldn;t put too much thoughtinto it from now own.
    Heck, at least he admitted it.

  30. RC IV says: Jun 12, 2010 8:00 PM

    Pervy Harvin says:
    June 11, 2010 3:37 PM
    RC IV says: The huge difference here is what Allen said was plainly tongue in cheek.
    Woodson talks “ghetto” because he and others like him think its cool(pervy even moreso)
    ===================================
    I talk as plain as English as any on this site. Ghetto RC??? You been hanging with Super too long! LOL
    ==========================
    Just screwin with ya Pervy!

  31. Beer Cheese Soup says: Jun 13, 2010 11:23 PM

    RC IV says:
    The fact that you have to brag about 42 years and older trophies speaks volumes. Yes, at least you have them, but they haven’t won anything going on 15 years, it’s not like they have been dominate lately!
    ____________________________________
    You’re right: At least we have them. You should have stopped right there in fact.
    You’re also right that it’s been nearly 15 years since our last one. Tell me though, how many championships have YOU won in the last 15 years? How many have you won in the last five? How many have you won.. ever?
    Fans of the Steelers, Patriots, Broncos, and a few others can talk to us about recent championships. You don’t qualify for that.
    You say we haven’t been “dominate” lately, but you fail to realize that by your own definition, you NEVER HAVE BEEN! Why do you insist on always presenting such a flawed, contradictory argument?

  32. RC IV says: Jun 14, 2010 11:49 AM

    That you cant see the flaw in your own argument speaks volumes.
    What? The packers haven’t done anything in 15 years, but they are still relevant because they won 11 titles pre 1970?
    I haven’t won any titles, neither have you. i just love it when fans think they have something to do with winning.
    I am qualified to talk about and have an opinion on anything, I don’t need your permission or a title. That is a lame argument.
    My point in these posts is to point what dimwits you people are for bringing up titles that have no bearing on present day teams.
    It’s a sad fall back argument that outsidrr of vox veritas, no fans of other teams do on here.
    Things sren’t going the Packs way? At least we were a dyansty in the 60s!
    Stupid lame and sad all at the same time.
    I guess Super was right about you, Beer.

  33. RC IV says: Jun 14, 2010 11:50 AM

    That you cant see the flaw in your own argument speaks volumes.
    What? The packers haven’t done anything in 15 years, but they are still relevant because they won 11 titles pre 1970?
    I haven’t won any titles, neither have you. i just love it when fans think they have something to do with winning.
    I am qualified to talk about and have an opinion on anything, I don’t need your permission or a title. That is a lame argument.
    My point in these posts is to point what dimwits you people are for bringing up titles that have no bearing on present day teams.
    It’s a sad fall back argument that outsidrr of vox veritas, no fans of other teams do on here.
    Things sren’t going the Packs way? At least we were a dyansty in the 60s!
    Stupid lame and sad all at the same time.
    I guess Super was right about you, Beer.

  34. RC IV says: Jun 14, 2010 11:50 AM

    That you cant see the flaw in your own argument speaks volumes.
    What? The packers haven’t done anything in 15 years, but they are still relevant because they won 11 titles pre 1970?
    I haven’t won any titles, neither have you. i just love it when fans think they have something to do with winning.
    I am qualified to talk about and have an opinion on anything, I don’t need your permission or a title. That is a lame argument.
    My point in these posts is to point what dimwits you people are for bringing up titles that have no bearing on present day teams.
    It’s a sad fall back argument that outsidrr of vox veritas, no fans of other teams do on here.
    Things sren’t going the Packs way? At least we were a dyansty in the 60s!
    Stupid lame and sad all at the same time.
    I guess Super was right about you, Beer.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!