<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rams get another rookie under contract, giving them six of 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: technoboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[technoboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they are now at 8 out of 11 signed... The top 2 and a  7th round TE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they are now at 8 out of 11 signed&#8230; The top 2 and a  7th round TE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jram</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 12:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to see they are getting them signed. I think the Rams will be much improved. My biggest concern right now is depth at both tackle spots. Hopefully they can get a veteran through free agency.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see they are getting them signed. I think the Rams will be much improved. My biggest concern right now is depth at both tackle spots. Hopefully they can get a veteran through free agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technoboy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[technoboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has to be a good sign that the front office is much better.   The previous front office destroyed this team.   There was a rumor on the www.stltoday.com that the Rams will have all the picks except 1st and 2nd, signed by the end of the day.    The Rams are on the rise and no body in the NFC West is very scary right now.   So maybe not this year, but next year they might be in the playoff hunt.    GO RAMS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be a good sign that the front office is much better.   The previous front office destroyed this team.   There was a rumor on the <a href="http://www.stltoday.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stltoday.com</a> that the Rams will have all the picks except 1st and 2nd, signed by the end of the day.    The Rams are on the rise and no body in the NFC West is very scary right now.   So maybe not this year, but next year they might be in the playoff hunt.    GO RAMS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darth_vincent</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darth_vincent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow!!! How exciting!!! 6 of 11 signed before July. What a HUGE advantage for them. Because of this profound development, I predict that the Rams have 1st place all wrapped up for the Cellar of the NFC West for the 4th year in a row.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!!! How exciting!!! 6 of 11 signed before July. What a HUGE advantage for them. Because of this profound development, I predict that the Rams have 1st place all wrapped up for the Cellar of the NFC West for the 4th year in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wild_eagle</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wild_eagle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Selvie is a boss, Idk why he dropped that far.. I thought he was much better than jdp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selvie is a boss, Idk why he dropped that far.. I thought he was much better than jdp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RhinoSteel56</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/06/28/rams-get-another-rookie-under-contract-giving-them-six-of-11/#comment-665207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RhinoSteel56]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbcprofootballtalk/?p=77702#comment-665207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One off from there record this year 5-11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One off from there record this year 5-11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
