<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 10 power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: detroitlionsnfl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-1791563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[detroitlionsnfl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-1791563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the day when the Lions were bad.... Ha! GO LIONS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the day when the Lions were bad&#8230;. Ha! GO LIONS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtstrecker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-848462</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mtstrecker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-848462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raiders at #9????

You are delusional. They are clearly a top five team. When they when the Superbowl this year, I hope you look back and consider how misguided you were in your ratings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raiders at #9????</p>
<p>You are delusional. They are clearly a top five team. When they when the Superbowl this year, I hope you look back and consider how misguided you were in your ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pastabelly</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-847670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pastabelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-847670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[xtrout says: 
Nov 16, 2010 2:11 PM 

&quot;This guy is delusional. The Browns beat NE soundly. The Jets beat the Browns. Oh yeah, The Jets beat NE too. NE is good, but from a ranking standpoint, Jets beat em handily.&quot;

_______________________________
Hmmm, that was a long time ago and the game was in NY.  The Pats were starting a bunch of rookies on defense and playing a different type of offense.  The Patriots have won road games in Baltimore, San Diego, and Pittsburgh.  But it really doesn&#039;t matter about these lists right now.  If the Patriots beat Indy, Green Bay, and the Jets (all home games), this discussion will be moot and we will know that they will win the division and get the bye.  That&#039;s all that matters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>xtrout says:<br />
Nov 16, 2010 2:11 PM </p>
<p>&#8220;This guy is delusional. The Browns beat NE soundly. The Jets beat the Browns. Oh yeah, The Jets beat NE too. NE is good, but from a ranking standpoint, Jets beat em handily.&#8221;</p>
<p>_______________________________<br />
Hmmm, that was a long time ago and the game was in NY.  The Pats were starting a bunch of rookies on defense and playing a different type of offense.  The Patriots have won road games in Baltimore, San Diego, and Pittsburgh.  But it really doesn&#8217;t matter about these lists right now.  If the Patriots beat Indy, Green Bay, and the Jets (all home games), this discussion will be moot and we will know that they will win the division and get the bye.  That&#8217;s all that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brasho</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-847182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brasho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 23:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-847182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so the Bucs have the best young QB in football, some real talent at WR and RB, an opportunistic defense... and of course according to Florio, they won&#039;t win 7 games for 3 seasons (I guess they need to go winless for the next 2 and a half seasons to fulfill that idiotic prediction)... and on top of that, they have won twice as many games as they have lost and came within a yard of beating the #1 team in the Falcons... which was prabably a better performance than the #4 Ravens had and yet they&#039;re at #18?  

Hilarious!  Especially considering that they beat the #14 team despite their QB playing for the first time in 3 weeks and coming off an injury that only affected his abililty to throw the ball.

And in the meantime, this team has greatly improved since week 1 with rookie LeGarrette Blount emerging as a powerhouse on the ground the last 3 games.

This Buc team is the youngest in the league and unlike the veteran laden teams, instead of getting worse throughout the year (because vets tend to breakdown physically), this team will continue to improve as they adjust to the speed of the game, gain experience, learn techniques, and learn the playbooks.  This #18 Bucs team will be far better than the one that started the season (they already are) and will continue to improve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so the Bucs have the best young QB in football, some real talent at WR and RB, an opportunistic defense&#8230; and of course according to Florio, they won&#8217;t win 7 games for 3 seasons (I guess they need to go winless for the next 2 and a half seasons to fulfill that idiotic prediction)&#8230; and on top of that, they have won twice as many games as they have lost and came within a yard of beating the #1 team in the Falcons&#8230; which was prabably a better performance than the #4 Ravens had and yet they&#8217;re at #18?  </p>
<p>Hilarious!  Especially considering that they beat the #14 team despite their QB playing for the first time in 3 weeks and coming off an injury that only affected his abililty to throw the ball.</p>
<p>And in the meantime, this team has greatly improved since week 1 with rookie LeGarrette Blount emerging as a powerhouse on the ground the last 3 games.</p>
<p>This Buc team is the youngest in the league and unlike the veteran laden teams, instead of getting worse throughout the year (because vets tend to breakdown physically), this team will continue to improve as they adjust to the speed of the game, gain experience, learn techniques, and learn the playbooks.  This #18 Bucs team will be far better than the one that started the season (they already are) and will continue to improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roddy84</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-847032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roddy84]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-847032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All Roddy White did was knock the idiot defender&#039;s arm and hand away from him before the dunderhead could hold him, push him or otherwise interfere with his route.  White can&#039;t help the fact that the DB can&#039;t stay on his feet and was trying to grab him to begin with.  White made a great play and &quot;got away&quot; with nothing more than saving the stumbling, bumbling, falling DB from his own illegal contact penalty.  Give it a rest....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All Roddy White did was knock the idiot defender&#8217;s arm and hand away from him before the dunderhead could hold him, push him or otherwise interfere with his route.  White can&#8217;t help the fact that the DB can&#8217;t stay on his feet and was trying to grab him to begin with.  White made a great play and &#8220;got away&#8221; with nothing more than saving the stumbling, bumbling, falling DB from his own illegal contact penalty.  Give it a rest&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borderline1988</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[borderline1988]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 20:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say the Eagles and Packers are playing the best football in the NFC right now.
The underrated Packers defense is arguably the best defense in the league (given up the fewest points so far). And the offense is starting to click - they&#039;re easily one of the best offensive teams in the NFL when healthy (even w/o grant). They&#039;re what you would call a &#039;complete&#039; team.
All those AFC teams have some great strentghs, but are not all-around good teams. 

The Jets should count their lucky stars that they&#039;re not 5-4 right now.  Their offense just isn&#039;t that good. The Pats are inconsistent. The Falcons have not beat anyone convincingly all season long (except for Arizona). They&#039;ve won games, but it&#039;s hard to say they&#039;ve been the better team in a lot of their wins. 

I guess you can make arguments for any team. But I can&#039;t wait to see the Packers-Falcons game in 2 weeks. It&#039;ll prove to be a big power-changer in the NFC&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say the Eagles and Packers are playing the best football in the NFC right now.<br />
The underrated Packers defense is arguably the best defense in the league (given up the fewest points so far). And the offense is starting to click &#8211; they&#8217;re easily one of the best offensive teams in the NFL when healthy (even w/o grant). They&#8217;re what you would call a &#8216;complete&#8217; team.<br />
All those AFC teams have some great strentghs, but are not all-around good teams. </p>
<p>The Jets should count their lucky stars that they&#8217;re not 5-4 right now.  Their offense just isn&#8217;t that good. The Pats are inconsistent. The Falcons have not beat anyone convincingly all season long (except for Arizona). They&#8217;ve won games, but it&#8217;s hard to say they&#8217;ve been the better team in a lot of their wins. </p>
<p>I guess you can make arguments for any team. But I can&#8217;t wait to see the Packers-Falcons game in 2 weeks. It&#8217;ll prove to be a big power-changer in the NFC&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtrout</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xtrout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper.

To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.&quot;

This guy is delusional. The Browns beat NE soundly. The Jets beat the Browns. Oh yeah, The Jets beat NE too. NE is good, but from a ranking standpoint, Jets beat em handily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper.</p>
<p>To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.&#8221;</p>
<p>This guy is delusional. The Browns beat NE soundly. The Jets beat the Browns. Oh yeah, The Jets beat NE too. NE is good, but from a ranking standpoint, Jets beat em handily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keabu</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keabu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All teams have injury problems.  Green Bay and Indy are winning with serious injury problems.  Pittsburgh (and other teams) is no worse off than them...so stifle it on the injury excuses.  No one should ever bring up injuries when discussing power rankings ... everyone has to over come them so I just don&#039;t want to hear about it.  

Teams being lucky?????   Good teams find a way to win .  Tell me a team that&#039;s won a super bowl without getting lucky a few times during that season]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All teams have injury problems.  Green Bay and Indy are winning with serious injury problems.  Pittsburgh (and other teams) is no worse off than them&#8230;so stifle it on the injury excuses.  No one should ever bring up injuries when discussing power rankings &#8230; everyone has to over come them so I just don&#8217;t want to hear about it.  </p>
<p>Teams being lucky?????   Good teams find a way to win .  Tell me a team that&#8217;s won a super bowl without getting lucky a few times during that season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nybeez80</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nybeez80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok so the Steelers are being held back due to injuries and you call them one of the best teams in football.  However you make no mention about the Giants injuries despite having more than the Steelers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so the Steelers are being held back due to injuries and you call them one of the best teams in football.  However you make no mention about the Giants injuries despite having more than the Steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmysee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmysee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How humiliating it must be for the Vikings and their troll fans here on PFT to be ranked BELOW Dallas after Dallas got blown out by the young Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How humiliating it must be for the Vikings and their troll fans here on PFT to be ranked BELOW Dallas after Dallas got blown out by the young Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scra22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scra22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2.  New York Jets (No.3; 7-2):  It’s better to be lucky than good.  But good tends to last a little longer.
======

This should be the line for the Falcons. In at least four of their games they got incredibly lucky right at the end to win. Roddy White&#039;s OPI not being called is just one example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2.  New York Jets (No.3; 7-2):  It’s better to be lucky than good.  But good tends to last a little longer.<br />
======</p>
<p>This should be the line for the Falcons. In at least four of their games they got incredibly lucky right at the end to win. Roddy White&#8217;s OPI not being called is just one example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lleesman725</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lleesman725]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no way Floria will make the bet of the Bucs making the playoffs he will shave his head. According to him, they should not win another game until about 2013. 6 wins in 3 years. At least people don&#039;t consider him an &quot;expert&quot;, even though they might as well if they consider Peter King an &quot;expert&quot;. No love for the Bucs ever. If there has ever been a team get its act together, this is it. Too bad the Cowboys are having a bad season or we would hear about them more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no way Floria will make the bet of the Bucs making the playoffs he will shave his head. According to him, they should not win another game until about 2013. 6 wins in 3 years. At least people don&#8217;t consider him an &#8220;expert&#8221;, even though they might as well if they consider Peter King an &#8220;expert&#8221;. No love for the Bucs ever. If there has ever been a team get its act together, this is it. Too bad the Cowboys are having a bad season or we would hear about them more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shallowfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shallowfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have to post again...

Looks like you believe in the Raiders too...they have lost to tenn,cardinals, and san fran...and barely beat the rams and chargers...plus lost to the texans...so you are basing your rankings on the fact they beat the broncos (#26), seahawks (#20), and chiefs (#15) the last 3 weeks...after losing to san fran (#24)...The Bucs last four games...Rams (#21), Cardinals (#28), Atl (#1), Car (#)...only lost to the #1 team...barely.

My point is both teams seem to be beating below 500 teams, yet you have Oakland in the top 10 and you will only believe the Bucs are good when they beat a good team and won&#039;t put them any higher...Everyone talks about beating the teams you are suppose to beat...well Oakland hasn&#039;t done that...they lost to teams they should&#039;ve beat.  The Bucs are beating teams nobody said they should beat and nearly beating the best in the league...even if I wasn&#039;t a bucs fan I would argue your logic is terrible in this case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to post again&#8230;</p>
<p>Looks like you believe in the Raiders too&#8230;they have lost to tenn,cardinals, and san fran&#8230;and barely beat the rams and chargers&#8230;plus lost to the texans&#8230;so you are basing your rankings on the fact they beat the broncos (#26), seahawks (#20), and chiefs (#15) the last 3 weeks&#8230;after losing to san fran (#24)&#8230;The Bucs last four games&#8230;Rams (#21), Cardinals (#28), Atl (#1), Car (#)&#8230;only lost to the #1 team&#8230;barely.</p>
<p>My point is both teams seem to be beating below 500 teams, yet you have Oakland in the top 10 and you will only believe the Bucs are good when they beat a good team and won&#8217;t put them any higher&#8230;Everyone talks about beating the teams you are suppose to beat&#8230;well Oakland hasn&#8217;t done that&#8230;they lost to teams they should&#8217;ve beat.  The Bucs are beating teams nobody said they should beat and nearly beating the best in the league&#8230;even if I wasn&#8217;t a bucs fan I would argue your logic is terrible in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clownburger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clownburger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As is reflected in these rankings, the football media is filled with a lot of dopes who can&#039;t accept the fact that the teams they thought would be good suck and the teams they thought would suck are good. 

Hence the constant ripping on the bucs and the constant hopeful urging of the Cowboys and Vikings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is reflected in these rankings, the football media is filled with a lot of dopes who can&#8217;t accept the fact that the teams they thought would be good suck and the teams they thought would suck are good. </p>
<p>Hence the constant ripping on the bucs and the constant hopeful urging of the Cowboys and Vikings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clownburger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clownburger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how anytime the Cowboys or Vikings win a game, the media creams in their pants a little bit and starts wondering if they can run the table. 

NOTE: The Cowboys and Vikings SUCK!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how anytime the Cowboys or Vikings win a game, the media creams in their pants a little bit and starts wondering if they can run the table. </p>
<p>NOTE: The Cowboys and Vikings SUCK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shallowfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shallowfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You seem to be giving Cleveland credit for taking teams to the wire and ranking them pretty high even though they have only won 3 games.  When other teams like the Bucs you give no credit to...they did come 1 yard from taking a late lead against Atl, which may have won the game for them.  

You do know that Atl barely beat san fran, got beat by pit, got stomped by philly, and barely beat cincy...and barely beat the bucs....YET you &quot;believe&quot; they are the #1 team and will only believe the bucs are higher than #18 when they beat someone you deam worthy.  This makes no sense to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be giving Cleveland credit for taking teams to the wire and ranking them pretty high even though they have only won 3 games.  When other teams like the Bucs you give no credit to&#8230;they did come 1 yard from taking a late lead against Atl, which may have won the game for them.  </p>
<p>You do know that Atl barely beat san fran, got beat by pit, got stomped by philly, and barely beat cincy&#8230;and barely beat the bucs&#8230;.YET you &#8220;believe&#8221; they are the #1 team and will only believe the bucs are higher than #18 when they beat someone you deam worthy.  This makes no sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: civilwarfish</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[civilwarfish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;richm2256 says: 
Nov 16, 2010 9:58 AM 
To those who have pointed out that the Browns just beat the Patriots, of course they did. The fact that New England just completely thrashed the world’s favorite team of the week, the Steelers, ought to show you that Cleveland was a mere brain fart on New England’s part. The Browns are what they are.&lt;/i&gt;

The Steelers were injury plagued...and the Patriots were feeling extreme angst at their thrashing at the hands of my Brownies. And it wasnt just a lucky thrashing either. This a week after an equally surprising and thorough defeat of the Saints.

Yes, the Browns are what they are. A damn fine football team just coming into their own.

You, on the other hand, are a moron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>richm2256 says:<br />
Nov 16, 2010 9:58 AM<br />
To those who have pointed out that the Browns just beat the Patriots, of course they did. The fact that New England just completely thrashed the world’s favorite team of the week, the Steelers, ought to show you that Cleveland was a mere brain fart on New England’s part. The Browns are what they are.</i></p>
<p>The Steelers were injury plagued&#8230;and the Patriots were feeling extreme angst at their thrashing at the hands of my Brownies. And it wasnt just a lucky thrashing either. This a week after an equally surprising and thorough defeat of the Saints.</p>
<p>Yes, the Browns are what they are. A damn fine football team just coming into their own.</p>
<p>You, on the other hand, are a moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ihumpedurmom</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ihumpedurmom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raiders at 9? At 9?!? Hahahaha!!! Any team that lost to the Cardinals and 49ers shouldn&#039;t even be in the top 20, let alone top 10. You guys are a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raiders at 9? At 9?!? Hahahaha!!! Any team that lost to the Cardinals and 49ers shouldn&#8217;t even be in the top 20, let alone top 10. You guys are a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannabear</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wannabear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why do you play to win if teams with lower records gets ranked over better ones?
Raiders over Bears and Steelers? Who you smoking with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you play to win if teams with lower records gets ranked over better ones?<br />
Raiders over Bears and Steelers? Who you smoking with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapnastier</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chapnastier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dallas played better because Jenkins and Newman went down and they are looking to get Dez Bryant the ball. Nothing else has changed but the play of the guys on the field. I am optimistic but they cant run the table with Garrett as the HC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dallas played better because Jenkins and Newman went down and they are looking to get Dez Bryant the ball. Nothing else has changed but the play of the guys on the field. I am optimistic but they cant run the table with Garrett as the HC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onewinningdrive</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[onewinningdrive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richm2256 says: 
Nov 16, 2010 8:09 AM 
A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper. 

To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.
----------------------------------

Patriots had one good game.  they are still overrated. Brady watched from the sideline SDs kicker to see if he goes to over time, you were beat by the Browns and jets and needed two punts in over time to beat the Ravens at HOME.

You are ahead of the Steelers, that should be good enough for now.

I think the Packers and the Falcons are too high.  Both are suspect.  Philly should be higher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richm2256 says:<br />
Nov 16, 2010 8:09 AM<br />
A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper. </p>
<p>To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Patriots had one good game.  they are still overrated. Brady watched from the sideline SDs kicker to see if he goes to over time, you were beat by the Browns and jets and needed two punts in over time to beat the Ravens at HOME.</p>
<p>You are ahead of the Steelers, that should be good enough for now.</p>
<p>I think the Packers and the Falcons are too high.  Both are suspect.  Philly should be higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kellyb9</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kellyb9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You lost me at 1. Atlanta Falcons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You lost me at 1. Atlanta Falcons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richm2256</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richm2256]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To those who have pointed out that the Browns just beat the Patriots, of course they did. The fact that New England just completely thrashed the world&#039;s favorite team of the week, the Steelers, ought to show you that Cleveland was a mere brain fart on New England&#039;s part. The Browns are what they are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who have pointed out that the Browns just beat the Patriots, of course they did. The fact that New England just completely thrashed the world&#8217;s favorite team of the week, the Steelers, ought to show you that Cleveland was a mere brain fart on New England&#8217;s part. The Browns are what they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: btintampa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[btintampa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the Bucs beat the best team that ever existed, in this universe of the next, in bare feet and with blindfolds, then, and only then, will I start to maybe begin to think about believing.

Florio, I apprehend you for the churlish knave of a bucket carrier you are.  Only a child would be so childish, and since you&#039;re a stubble beard, there can be only one reason for your stick-in-the-eye journalistic methods: provoke more people, in this case Bucs fans, to register so they can come on and hurl brown matter in your direction.  You have succeeded.  I can see the ad execs at NBC patting your coifed little head now.  Here is a free bit of marketing advice.  If the Bucs make the playoffs, shave your head.  Just think of the ratings!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Bucs beat the best team that ever existed, in this universe of the next, in bare feet and with blindfolds, then, and only then, will I start to maybe begin to think about believing.</p>
<p>Florio, I apprehend you for the churlish knave of a bucket carrier you are.  Only a child would be so childish, and since you&#8217;re a stubble beard, there can be only one reason for your stick-in-the-eye journalistic methods: provoke more people, in this case Bucs fans, to register so they can come on and hurl brown matter in your direction.  You have succeeded.  I can see the ad execs at NBC patting your coifed little head now.  Here is a free bit of marketing advice.  If the Bucs make the playoffs, shave your head.  Just think of the ratings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jetsarestacked</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jetsarestacked]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richm2256

The browns team that the jets squeaked by this past Sunday beat the crap out of the pats by 20 points and it wasn&#039;t that close. Also, the Jets beat the Pats by 2 touchdowns in a game that wasn&#039;t that close either. 

You&#039;re an idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richm2256</p>
<p>The browns team that the jets squeaked by this past Sunday beat the crap out of the pats by 20 points and it wasn&#8217;t that close. Also, the Jets beat the Pats by 2 touchdowns in a game that wasn&#8217;t that close either. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grendelg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grendelg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@macjacmccoy The Eagles were definitely impressive... But it was just the Redskins. I&#039;d say home field advantage would decide the game between the Falcons and Eagles... The Falcons are nigh on unbeatable at home, but they sure didn&#039;t look good @ Philly. Atlanta has the better record so they&#039;d get the home field, therefore, Falcons on top. For now.

As a Falcons fan it&#039;s nice to see them at #1, but it makes me nervous... Especially going into St Louis where the Rams have been pretty good at home, whereas the Falcons have just been okay on the road.... We&#039;ll see.

@richm2256 When putting down the Jets for only squeaking by the Browns it helps to remember a few facts:
1 - They&#039;ve played some pretty tough teams like the Falcons, Bucs, and Ravens to close games
2 - They beat the Saints
3 - They beat the PATRIOTS WHO YOU&#039;RE CLAIMING SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN THE JETS.... Not just a fluke win but a beatdown!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@macjacmccoy The Eagles were definitely impressive&#8230; But it was just the Redskins. I&#8217;d say home field advantage would decide the game between the Falcons and Eagles&#8230; The Falcons are nigh on unbeatable at home, but they sure didn&#8217;t look good @ Philly. Atlanta has the better record so they&#8217;d get the home field, therefore, Falcons on top. For now.</p>
<p>As a Falcons fan it&#8217;s nice to see them at #1, but it makes me nervous&#8230; Especially going into St Louis where the Rams have been pretty good at home, whereas the Falcons have just been okay on the road&#8230;. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>@richm2256 When putting down the Jets for only squeaking by the Browns it helps to remember a few facts:<br />
1 &#8211; They&#8217;ve played some pretty tough teams like the Falcons, Bucs, and Ravens to close games<br />
2 &#8211; They beat the Saints<br />
3 &#8211; They beat the PATRIOTS WHO YOU&#8217;RE CLAIMING SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN THE JETS&#8230;. Not just a fluke win but a beatdown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ineptguy6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ineptguy6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richm2256 says: Nov 16, 2010 8:09 AM

A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper.

To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.

You do realize that the Patriots lost to the Browns right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richm2256 says: Nov 16, 2010 8:09 AM</p>
<p>A list that has the Patriots at less than Number One after a thorough beating of the worldwide favorite from last week, is a list you can use for toilet paper.</p>
<p>To have the Jets -who barely eeked a wins two weeks in a row against such powerhouses as the Cleveland Browns – ranked higher than New England is demeaning to your reputation as a credible (gulp) football writer.</p>
<p>You do realize that the Patriots lost to the Browns right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelersfan5569</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelersfan5569]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok so Im a Steelers fan I know we didnt play the best of games this week but #11 really Florio Im a little upset about that I dont understand how you put a team that had a bye week in the top like that what did they do this week to earn it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so Im a Steelers fan I know we didnt play the best of games this week but #11 really Florio Im a little upset about that I dont understand how you put a team that had a bye week in the top like that what did they do this week to earn it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steviethewiz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steviethewiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha - I guess all the New England Cheater fans will be crying in their moms basements but facts are facts ladies. Browns destroyed the Pats* and the Jets beat the Browns enough said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha &#8211; I guess all the New England Cheater fans will be crying in their moms basements but facts are facts ladies. Browns destroyed the Pats* and the Jets beat the Browns enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanchoHerreraFanClub</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/11/16/week_10_power_rankings/#comment-846376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PanchoHerreraFanClub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=90737#comment-846376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again with the media bias for the Cowboys. The Cowboys stink. After getting blown away at home by the Lions next week, the Cowboys will be back at the bottom. Take it to the bank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again with the media bias for the Cowboys. The Cowboys stink. After getting blown away at home by the Lions next week, the Cowboys will be back at the bottom. Take it to the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
