Comments on: Vikings finally sign Lorenzo Booker

By: barneyrumble

barneyrumble — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 18:09:34 +0000

I don’t think there will be a collusion charge from this. This is just doing good business, making the cost more in line with the risk reward when taking into consideration the limited number of games left in the schedule.

By: agamemnon1974

agamemnon1974 — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:59:10 +0000

Does this mean that Favre is going on IR to make room for Booker?

By: toe4

toe4 — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:42:57 +0000

With every NFL team refusing to pay the big money but teams starting to pay the little money… how will this harm the teams standing with the union negotiations vis-a-vis collusion?

By: hobartbaker

hobartbaker — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:38:35 +0000

Not to be confused with Lorenzo Texter. Who may, in fact, be headed the other way. In lieu of the $25,000 fee.

By: newagerocker

newagerocker — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:35:20 +0000

Nice guy, but he didn’t do anything on the field for The Birds or The Fins.

By: jimmy1smith

jimmy1smith — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:32:11 +0000

The missing piece to their Superbowl run.

Wait, they are 5-7, maybe next year.

By: canadianvikingfaniii

canadianvikingfaniii — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:30:12 +0000

Please dump Albert Young. He has been freeloading on this team and can’t contribute to anything at all. He’s not fast, strong or evasive.

By: FinFan68

FinFan68 — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 17:29:39 +0000

The Vikings signed another player that has shown a willingness to not play…nice move