Comments on: Favre-Sterger decision apparently coming next week

By: theytukrjobs

theytukrjobs — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:08:53 +0000

Goodell would be doing Favre a favor to give him a 4 game suspension after the season is over. Just so no teams get any funny ideas.

By: goldsteel

goldsteel — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:21:07 +0000

Not next week but the week after is when the decission will be made. Or a non decision because Farve won’t be playing anymore.

By: sportsmediacritic

sportsmediacritic — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:23:10 +0000

This isn’t complicated. They are giving Favre a free pass because of who he is, nothing more and nothing less. They aren’t going to discipline him prior to his last game.

And you don’t need to violate the “law” to be punished under personal conduct.

If sending pics of your @#$@$ to a team employee/contractor and asking the lady to send you texts back of her #@%$#@%# isn’t something warranting a personal conduct violation, well, then I don’t know what is….

Free pass for Favre.

By: supergoonone

supergoonone — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:22:35 +0000

It was Bens second problem in 8 months. What part of that do the steelers fans not understand. Ben didn’t do anything except be stupid. Why if you accused in something like that would you get involved with another chick like that. Big Ben suspension was a reminder not to screw up again. Kind of like when you did something in the sandbox, then did it again after an adult told you not to.

By: supergoonone

supergoonone — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:15:02 +0000

@stellar performance.

and thats when that should happen

like I told you before. 1 game for fratenalization. No admittance of guilt.

By: stellarperformance

stellarperformance — Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:51:34 +0000

The statute of limitations runs out on the 28th. Look for a response from the NFL on the 29th.

By: nbseesnothing

nbseesnothing — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 23:35:53 +0000

Wait for it. This means poo slinger was w wr wro wrongggggggggggggg. Love when i-tie justice comes thru. And remember the cast of judgement time was reported on the. Nothing But Crap Network first.

By: notredamegirl

notredamegirl — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:40:13 +0000

There is no wrong doing in the first place! Punish him for what? Being a cheater? Give me a break! Then you have all the Favre haters screaming for blood! What a joke this whole thing has become…the good ole American way!

By: steelers6pack

steelers6pack — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:37:59 +0000

Here si a theory. Goodell never wanted to punish the “great Favre”! Why..The commish is SOFT! He has a text message and photos and does NOTHING! Ben gets “accused” with no evidenve and gets suspended?? Goodell is makign a mockery of the NFL and is the worse commish in any sport! This man and his hencemen need investigated for there doings!

By: akpackfan

akpackfan — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:33:32 +0000

Wasn’t this decision supposed to come in October? Yeah, the decision will probably come Jan 3…the day after the regular season ends.

By: packrulzm

packrulzm — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:21:11 +0000

Wow, Roger. Fantastic timing. You sir, have made a mockery of yourself. This is pathetic. Any other player would have been fined, suspended or had the case against him to be proven false. But not Brent. No, he’s too precious to leagues best interests………money. Ridiculous. I don’t care if Brent is guilty or innocent, just make a decision for Christ sake. You spent what, like 2 seconds deciding on Rothlisberger, but this case CANNOT be cracked. What a joke of a commissioner.

By: silkyjohnson937

silkyjohnson937 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:30:15 +0000

Steelers qb is named ben rapingthefurburger for a reason and who cares about favre his wife will divorce him and take all his money soon as he done making money just like michael jordans wife did so basically she is just pimping him out right now get out there and make her money betch

By: chrisbermansdoublechin

chrisbermansdoublechin — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:07:48 +0000

there will be NO DISCIPLINE b/c it’s too difficult for the league to determine whether sexual harrassment as defined by the law occured??? … he wasn’t reluctant to slap Ben with a six game suspension, when there were NO CHARGES brought against him, [not that a suspension of Ben wasn’t justified}, the double standard here is nauseating …the NFLPA needs to go after GODells authority in the next collective bargaining aggreement, there needs to be some type of committee that players can address & challenge greivances, fines & suspensions when this Commissioner shows no consistency in his discipline & FAVORTISM to certain players.

By: mean13

mean13 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:33:17 +0000

wtf2812 says: Dec 24, 2010 10:12 AM

“Isn’t it fitting that GODell waited until the last week of the regular season to announce a decision on the golden boy??? What’s he gonna do … suspend a guy who is retiring? It would have been nice if the Commish waited that long to act on Big Ben.

But some people are treated differently ,,, even when the evidence is in front of your face.”

WHAT!?!? Okay, 1 more time for the braindead. The Rapenstein investigation was well underway when Pig Ben’s lawyer met with the victim’s lawyer for a day. 2 days later – SHAZAM! – victim and her lawyer withdraw all charges and refuse to discuss the case with anyone ever again.

Yes, some people are treated differently. And some choose to pay off the people they have wronged (that would be the guilty).

By: nupurpleheart

nupurpleheart — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:29:16 +0000

Where was it reported that Childress and the Vikings
have verified that those were photos of Favre?

By the way guys, it is “v” before “r” in Favre!

By: skolvikes1

skolvikes1 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:13:34 +0000

wtf2812 says:
Dec 24, 2010 10:12 AM
Isn’t it fitting that GODell waited until the last week of the regular season to announce a decision on the golden boy??? What’s he gonna do … suspend a guy who is retiring? It would have been nice if the Commish waited that long to act on Big Ben.

But some people are treated differently ,,, even when the evidence is in front of your face.

___________________________________

Yeah, because what Big Ben and Brett Favre did are similar.

Hmmmm….rape or send pictures of your privates. Similar offenses.

By: melikefootball

melikefootball — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:43:28 +0000

Why even write this as a topic. The biggest joke of all the garbage that has come out of God-del’s office this year. They aren’t kidding anyone in NFL land with all the wishy washy talk of the comish office. This proves beyond a doubt that the NFL league office likes to strut there power but are hypocritical in all there actions from fines to addressing Farve crap.

By: slatetundra07

slatetundra07 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:32:06 +0000

Enough of his horse crap…next week…no the next week…no, no, no…I promise the next week!

The NFL will make a decision next year.

By: tprt2

tprt2 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:28:52 +0000

And, we all finally realize what I’ve said all along – this was nothing more than a fishing expedition with absolutely no bait.

Wasted time and emotions.

By: smellmyface

smellmyface — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:52:31 +0000

Crooked NFL…just like they wont hear the Haynesworth case till the season is over. As big a selfish baby that he was the Redskins probably dont have enough cause to suspend him.

By: johnnyb612

johnnyb612 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:27:31 +0000

Those pictures couldn’t have been of favre because chillys head was nowhere to be found.

By: pervyharvin

pervyharvin — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:25:40 +0000

Is it true that Brett and Rex Ryan have been consoling each other?

By: johnnyb612

johnnyb612 — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:22:56 +0000

I suspect that charges will be brought against him on the 27th. If they aren’t, her lawyer is worthless.

By: palinforpresidentofnorthkorea

palinforpresidentofnorthkorea — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:18:41 +0000

Farve will get even with Godell and Sterger by putting a bronze replica of his weenie in the HOF.

They can verify in person, “yep, that’s #4.”

By: flashdeath

flashdeath — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:17:48 +0000

Bring the suit. A good lawyer gets that whore in a deposition and we’re going to find out that Farve’s pee-pee is just the “tip” of the iceberg. You cannot play the slut card and suddenly turn into mother Mary.

By: iffybiz

iffybiz — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:17:40 +0000

There one BIG problem with your thinking. The commish doesn’t have to issue a ruling based on whether Farve legally committed sexual harassment, he has the “for the good of the league” argument for going after Farve. It’s in the league’s best interests not to appear to condone this kind of behavior, it could open them up to lawsuits for anything similar that happens after this.
One thing that is curious, if I’m Farve and the league is told “punish him or we’ll sue him” I’d be telling the league to throw the book at me. Missing the last two games will be nothing compared to the damage a lawsuit would bring.

By: importantpftcomment

importantpftcomment — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:02:38 +0000

So basically what you have here is yet another case of PFT’s RANK speculation and endless conspiracy theories.

Sorry, but *IF* Goodall is telling the truth, and he *HOPES* a decision happens before the end of the regular season doesn’t mean squat. Hope in one hand, crap in the other, see which fills up first!

Not to mention that PFT has also pointed out in the past that any decision the NFL has would have no bearing on any legal case!

By: ratbastardshanahandjob

ratbastardshanahandjob — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:58:31 +0000

Sterger’s next hussle will be for Larry Flint…..

In the immortal words of Iron Mike Tyson. Jenn just “fade into Bolivian”…..

By: notredamegirl

notredamegirl — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:57:08 +0000

Favre did not do anything wrong! She only started yelling SH after he told her to take a hike…..she ain’t getting any money. Now she is trying to make herself look good by saying we want justice! For what? Only the Favre haters thinks this chick is the virgin Mary!

By: prior0knowledge

prior0knowledge — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 16:55:14 +0000

While reading this post, I realize the advantage the readers get because MF is a lawyer.