<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your NFC playoff picture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: comeonnowguys</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-893021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[comeonnowguys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-893021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Falcons-Pats – Best Super Bowl in a decade. Mark my words.&quot;

Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiight.  

Also, I love when people end their posts with &quot;Book it!&quot; &quot;You heard it here first!&quot; or &quot;Mark my words!&quot; Like anybody is going to keep track of what some anonymous schmuck on one site predicts.

Sincerely yours,
Some anonymous schmuck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Falcons-Pats – Best Super Bowl in a decade. Mark my words.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiight.  </p>
<p>Also, I love when people end their posts with &#8220;Book it!&#8221; &#8220;You heard it here first!&#8221; or &#8220;Mark my words!&#8221; Like anybody is going to keep track of what some anonymous schmuck on one site predicts.</p>
<p>Sincerely yours,<br />
Some anonymous schmuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigrickonsports</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-892952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigrickonsports]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-892952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still think the Ravens are the team to beat. They have a punishing defense that can carry them all the way to  a Lombardi Trophy. And let us not forget what they did to the Pats last season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think the Ravens are the team to beat. They have a punishing defense that can carry them all the way to  a Lombardi Trophy. And let us not forget what they did to the Pats last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rammerray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rammerray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 20:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RAMS fan here. I know a lot of people out there don&#039;t like the NFC West. Well, after 3 VERY frustrating years, I&#039;m glad that my RAMS have a shot. After winning only 6 games the last 3 years combined, winning 7 in one season IS a big deal here. And for all of you who&#039;s team is doing well now, what goes around comes around. They won&#039;t be on top forever!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RAMS fan here. I know a lot of people out there don&#8217;t like the NFC West. Well, after 3 VERY frustrating years, I&#8217;m glad that my RAMS have a shot. After winning only 6 games the last 3 years combined, winning 7 in one season IS a big deal here. And for all of you who&#8217;s team is doing well now, what goes around comes around. They won&#8217;t be on top forever!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clownburger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clownburger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To help those who don&#039;t know: 

The 4 division winners get the top 4 seeds, period. The seeding among those 4 is decided by the records, best record being #1 seed and so on.  

So whoever DOESN&#039;T win the NFC South, is the #5 seed (aka, the #1 Wild Card team)

People often forget that the whole point of there being 2 wild card teams is to reward the top 2 teams in the conference who DID NOT win their division. 

The moral of the story is that winning your division is a big deal in the NFL, but if you didn&#039;t win your division and are still pretty good, you still have a shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To help those who don&#8217;t know: </p>
<p>The 4 division winners get the top 4 seeds, period. The seeding among those 4 is decided by the records, best record being #1 seed and so on.  </p>
<p>So whoever DOESN&#8217;T win the NFC South, is the #5 seed (aka, the #1 Wild Card team)</p>
<p>People often forget that the whole point of there being 2 wild card teams is to reward the top 2 teams in the conference who DID NOT win their division. </p>
<p>The moral of the story is that winning your division is a big deal in the NFL, but if you didn&#8217;t win your division and are still pretty good, you still have a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kev86</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kev86]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the Giants are going to make it in.  They are getting thrashed by the local/national media pretty good (deservingly so) but have the talent to snap out of it and get hot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Giants are going to make it in.  They are getting thrashed by the local/national media pretty good (deservingly so) but have the talent to snap out of it and get hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: touchdownroddywhite</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[touchdownroddywhite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falcons will see 14-2 tied for the best record in the league, with the Pats, to start building the hype for a Falcons-Pats Super Bowl, which is what every football fan in America, who doesn&#039;t want to see an Eagles-Pats rematch, wants to see whether they realize it or not.

Falcons-Pats - Best Super Bowl in a decade.  Mark my words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcons will see 14-2 tied for the best record in the league, with the Pats, to start building the hype for a Falcons-Pats Super Bowl, which is what every football fan in America, who doesn&#8217;t want to see an Eagles-Pats rematch, wants to see whether they realize it or not.</p>
<p>Falcons-Pats &#8211; Best Super Bowl in a decade.  Mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gamustangdude</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gamustangdude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This game on 
Monday is nothing more than a rivalry game.  It is more meaningful to the saints then the falcons.  If Atlanta wins they rest next week vs the panthers that&#039;s our only incentive. To beat the saints twice would be great but on the grand scheme of things should not be treated no differently then the last preseason game by Atlanta.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This game on<br />
Monday is nothing more than a rivalry game.  It is more meaningful to the saints then the falcons.  If Atlanta wins they rest next week vs the panthers that&#8217;s our only incentive. To beat the saints twice would be great but on the grand scheme of things should not be treated no differently then the last preseason game by Atlanta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claymath52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[claymath52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems to me if there’s anything that’s been shown this season it’s that the Bears do not suck. The team has come through adversity and continued to win.

That being said, next Sunday’s game at Lambeau will be a rumble. Possibly followed by a further rumble at Soldier Field.


Agreed.  It would be tough to beat the Bears twice in a row with the second game in Chicago.  With that said, &quot;The Bears still suck,&quot; is mostly just a chant Packers fans like to use weather it is accurate or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me if there’s anything that’s been shown this season it’s that the Bears do not suck. The team has come through adversity and continued to win.</p>
<p>That being said, next Sunday’s game at Lambeau will be a rumble. Possibly followed by a further rumble at Soldier Field.</p>
<p>Agreed.  It would be tough to beat the Bears twice in a row with the second game in Chicago.  With that said, &#8220;The Bears still suck,&#8221; is mostly just a chant Packers fans like to use weather it is accurate or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: txbearmeat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[txbearmeat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Assuming the Iggles win their last two, there should be no doubt at all the Packers win both upcoming games with da Burrs.
-
The recipe for beating them is simple: Don&#039;t turn it over, and don&#039;t kick to Hester.  GB is more talented and will prove that come Sunday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming the Iggles win their last two, there should be no doubt at all the Packers win both upcoming games with da Burrs.<br />
-<br />
The recipe for beating them is simple: Don&#8217;t turn it over, and don&#8217;t kick to Hester.  GB is more talented and will prove that come Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The team has come through adversity and continued to win.
---------------------------------

Huh? What adversity? They&#039;ve played against how many 2nd and 3rd string QBs this year? Adversity my ass.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team has come through adversity and continued to win.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Huh? What adversity? They&#8217;ve played against how many 2nd and 3rd string QBs this year? Adversity my ass&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Done - whether it&#039;s this week or next.

2. No bye for you, see #6

3. Philly gets the other bye, also see #6

4. Who cares?

5. Saints are in - they&#039;ll get at least one win over the next two weeks.

6. Book it - Bears lose by 20 and 14 in back to back weeks. Unfortunately for Bears fans - Lovie and Angelo return for another 2 years.

7. Sorry Giants, you had your chance. Good luck next year with a new coach.

8. Nice story but ain&#039;t happening. Still waiting for them to beat a good team. Maybe they&#039;ll prove they belong next year.

9. Again, who cares?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Done &#8211; whether it&#8217;s this week or next.</p>
<p>2. No bye for you, see #6</p>
<p>3. Philly gets the other bye, also see #6</p>
<p>4. Who cares?</p>
<p>5. Saints are in &#8211; they&#8217;ll get at least one win over the next two weeks.</p>
<p>6. Book it &#8211; Bears lose by 20 and 14 in back to back weeks. Unfortunately for Bears fans &#8211; Lovie and Angelo return for another 2 years.</p>
<p>7. Sorry Giants, you had your chance. Good luck next year with a new coach.</p>
<p>8. Nice story but ain&#8217;t happening. Still waiting for them to beat a good team. Maybe they&#8217;ll prove they belong next year.</p>
<p>9. Again, who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mysticdriver</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mysticdriver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting good chuckles reading the what-if scenarios that entertain the possibility that Atlanta going 12/4.
Are you that desperate to come up with any illusion that would help you feel better about your teams chances? Why not accept that ATL will be #1 seed going 14/2 and figure your seeds predicated on that fact? Do you honestly expect us to believe that ATL will lose the next 2 @ home? What if there REALLY  is a Santa Claus?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting good chuckles reading the what-if scenarios that entertain the possibility that Atlanta going 12/4.<br />
Are you that desperate to come up with any illusion that would help you feel better about your teams chances? Why not accept that ATL will be #1 seed going 14/2 and figure your seeds predicated on that fact? Do you honestly expect us to believe that ATL will lose the next 2 @ home? What if there REALLY  is a Santa Claus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bears v. Packers outside in January with playoff implications.

Sounds good to me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bears v. Packers outside in January with playoff implications.</p>
<p>Sounds good to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmysee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmysee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[claymath52 says:
Dec 26, 2010 11:37 PM

Sweet Indeed. Can’t think of anything better than to beat the Bears two weeks in a row. The BEARS STILL SUCK!!!

------------------------------------------------------------

Seems to me if there&#039;s anything that&#039;s been shown this season it&#039;s that the Bears do not suck.   The team has come through adversity and continued to win.

That being said, next Sunday&#039;s game at Lambeau will be a rumble.  Possibly followed by a further rumble at Soldier Field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>claymath52 says:<br />
Dec 26, 2010 11:37 PM</p>
<p>Sweet Indeed. Can’t think of anything better than to beat the Bears two weeks in a row. The BEARS STILL SUCK!!!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Seems to me if there&#8217;s anything that&#8217;s been shown this season it&#8217;s that the Bears do not suck.   The team has come through adversity and continued to win.</p>
<p>That being said, next Sunday&#8217;s game at Lambeau will be a rumble.  Possibly followed by a further rumble at Soldier Field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biglebronski</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[biglebronski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 13:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, this likely won&#039;t happen every year, but moving division games to the last three weeks looks like a great idea right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this likely won&#8217;t happen every year, but moving division games to the last three weeks looks like a great idea right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eaglesnoles05</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eaglesnoles05]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Falcons will get it done. And if they don&#039;t lose their 1st playoff game, Philly will go to ATL for the nfc championship game. Some...how...that...seems...like...it...might...be...intriguing... for...some...reason...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcons will get it done. And if they don&#8217;t lose their 1st playoff game, Philly will go to ATL for the nfc championship game. Some&#8230;how&#8230;that&#8230;seems&#8230;like&#8230;it&#8230;might&#8230;be&#8230;intriguing&#8230; for&#8230;some&#8230;reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brasho</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brasho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ooops, I meant the Bucs having the better conference record than the Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, I meant the Bucs having the better conference record than the Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brasho</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brasho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also have the Bucs getting in if they beat the Saints and the Giants lose with the Saints owning the better conference record.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have the Bucs getting in if they beat the Saints and the Giants lose with the Saints owning the better conference record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iluvwikileaks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iluvwikileaks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seababies drool. I hope the Rams beat them. They are a better team and deserve it. Hasselbeck is one of the biggest busts of any NFL quarterback. Next to Carson Palmer. I still smile recalling the Steelers kicking his @$$ in the Super Bowl 5 years ago:)

I hope the Bucs get in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seababies drool. I hope the Rams beat them. They are a better team and deserve it. Hasselbeck is one of the biggest busts of any NFL quarterback. Next to Carson Palmer. I still smile recalling the Steelers kicking his @$$ in the Super Bowl 5 years ago:)</p>
<p>I hope the Bucs get in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voodoochild47</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voodoochild47]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Giants don&#039;t deserve to make it into the playoffs! They better take a page from the Cowboys playbook and get a new coach!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Giants don&#8217;t deserve to make it into the playoffs! They better take a page from the Cowboys playbook and get a new coach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voodoochild47</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voodoochild47]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry...meant heart was in the right place...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry&#8230;meant heart was in the right place&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voodoochild47</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[voodoochild47]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 10:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great man! Heart was in the wrong place but when I saw him and Troy Smith go at it I knew he was on the way out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great man! Heart was in the wrong place but when I saw him and Troy Smith go at it I knew he was on the way out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirksimmons</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dirksimmons]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 07:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went on ESPN&#039;s playoff machine and here&#039;s what I got:

-To get the #1 seed, ATL needs to win one remaining game.
-To get the #1 seed, CHI needs to win their last remaining game, have ATL lose both remaining games and have PHI lose one of their remaining games.  If Eagles finish 12-4, somehow the Falcons would regain the #1 seed from the Bears.
-To get the #1 seed, PHI needs to win both remaining games, have CHI lose their last remaining game, have ATL lose both remaining games, and have Saints lose against the Bucs.
-To get the #1 seed, the Saints need to win both remaining games and have ATL lose to CAR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went on ESPN&#8217;s playoff machine and here&#8217;s what I got:</p>
<p>-To get the #1 seed, ATL needs to win one remaining game.<br />
-To get the #1 seed, CHI needs to win their last remaining game, have ATL lose both remaining games and have PHI lose one of their remaining games.  If Eagles finish 12-4, somehow the Falcons would regain the #1 seed from the Bears.<br />
-To get the #1 seed, PHI needs to win both remaining games, have CHI lose their last remaining game, have ATL lose both remaining games, and have Saints lose against the Bucs.<br />
-To get the #1 seed, the Saints need to win both remaining games and have ATL lose to CAR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 54bear55</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-891047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[54bear55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 06:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-891047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the #5 seed is the most desirable spot in the nfc, barring a first round bye. That team will get to play against one of the worst playoff teams in recent memory, regardless of who comes out on top Sunday night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the #5 seed is the most desirable spot in the nfc, barring a first round bye. That team will get to play against one of the worst playoff teams in recent memory, regardless of who comes out on top Sunday night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geauxformore</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geauxformore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saints beating the Falclowns. Is it Monday yet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saints beating the Falclowns. Is it Monday yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scra22</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scra22]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[macjacmccoy says: Dec 26, 2010 11:20 PM
So what happens if the Eagles, Falcons, and Saints are tied at 12-4. I know that gives the Saints the division but who would get home field advantage through out the playoffs(asuming the Bears lose next week vs the Packers)?
=======
If the Saints and Falcons both ended up at 12-4,  the Falcons would be the 5th seed. The Eagles have 3 NFC losses and the Saints only have 2, so the Saints would be #1 and Eagles #2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>macjacmccoy says: Dec 26, 2010 11:20 PM<br />
So what happens if the Eagles, Falcons, and Saints are tied at 12-4. I know that gives the Saints the division but who would get home field advantage through out the playoffs(asuming the Bears lose next week vs the Packers)?<br />
=======<br />
If the Saints and Falcons both ended up at 12-4,  the Falcons would be the 5th seed. The Eagles have 3 NFC losses and the Saints only have 2, so the Saints would be #1 and Eagles #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowboys4life</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cowboys4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colts V Falcons.. Peyton Manning wins his last superbowl....mark it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colts V Falcons.. Peyton Manning wins his last superbowl&#8230;.mark it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dontbugmeanymore</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dontbugmeanymore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bucs’ official website appears to refer to a tiebreaker with Atlanta (which can&#039;t apply since ATL can&#039;t have less than 12 wins) when it should refer to Green Bay, thus everything the Bucs’ official website claims has to be consider suspect.

If you want to check for yourself, see the second scenario 1 (yes, it has 2 scenarios listed as scenario #1, at least from my reading) bullet point 5, sentence 3.

Of course, I don&#039;t blame anyone. The Yahoo playoff scenario generator is having problems too (listing the Eagle&#039;s w/ 17 games).

What does this all mean, just read Gregg Rosenthal&#039;s post and you&#039;ll know enough to make it to next Sunday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bucs’ official website appears to refer to a tiebreaker with Atlanta (which can&#8217;t apply since ATL can&#8217;t have less than 12 wins) when it should refer to Green Bay, thus everything the Bucs’ official website claims has to be consider suspect.</p>
<p>If you want to check for yourself, see the second scenario 1 (yes, it has 2 scenarios listed as scenario #1, at least from my reading) bullet point 5, sentence 3.</p>
<p>Of course, I don&#8217;t blame anyone. The Yahoo playoff scenario generator is having problems too (listing the Eagle&#8217;s w/ 17 games).</p>
<p>What does this all mean, just read Gregg Rosenthal&#8217;s post and you&#8217;ll know enough to make it to next Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattlion</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mattlion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what happens if the Eagles, Falcons, and Saints are tied at 12-4. I know that gives the Saints the division but who would get home field advantage through out the playoffs(asuming the Bears lose next week vs the Packers)?

Also what happens if the Eagles, Bears, and Falcons all end the season at 12-4? The Eagles hold the advantage over the Falcons but the Bears hold the advantage over the Eagles. How does the playoff seeding work out? Is it Bears 1, Eagles 2, Falcons 3?



The first tiebreaker after head-to-head for teams in different divisions is conference record.  So, in scenario 1 (Eagles/Falcons/Saints all 12-4) the Saints would be the 1, the Eagles would be the 2.  The Saints, if they finish 12-4, would have a 10-2 conference record, beating the Eagles&#039; 9-3.

In scenario 2 (Eagles/Bears/Falcons all 12-4) you can&#039;t do head to head since there is no sweep involved (the Eagles went 1-1 against the other 2 and the Falcons and Bears didn&#039;t play), they would all be 9-3 in conference, so it would go to common games.... which I don&#039;t have time to figure out....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what happens if the Eagles, Falcons, and Saints are tied at 12-4. I know that gives the Saints the division but who would get home field advantage through out the playoffs(asuming the Bears lose next week vs the Packers)?</p>
<p>Also what happens if the Eagles, Bears, and Falcons all end the season at 12-4? The Eagles hold the advantage over the Falcons but the Bears hold the advantage over the Eagles. How does the playoff seeding work out? Is it Bears 1, Eagles 2, Falcons 3?</p>
<p>The first tiebreaker after head-to-head for teams in different divisions is conference record.  So, in scenario 1 (Eagles/Falcons/Saints all 12-4) the Saints would be the 1, the Eagles would be the 2.  The Saints, if they finish 12-4, would have a 10-2 conference record, beating the Eagles&#8217; 9-3.</p>
<p>In scenario 2 (Eagles/Bears/Falcons all 12-4) you can&#8217;t do head to head since there is no sweep involved (the Eagles went 1-1 against the other 2 and the Falcons and Bears didn&#8217;t play), they would all be 9-3 in conference, so it would go to common games&#8230;. which I don&#8217;t have time to figure out&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cobrala</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/12/26/wild-card-spots-still-up-for-grabs-in-nfc/#comment-890936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cobrala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 05:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=99781#comment-890936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How could the Packers and Giants lose next week?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How could the Packers and Giants lose next week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
