<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Packer photo fallout: Jermichael Finley responds to Rodgers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:58:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ruvelligwebuike</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ruvelligwebuike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I have been working my tail off 5 hours a day!&quot;
--------------

J-Mike later listed other accomplishments, like never beating the crap out of a women and not stealing for over 6 months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have been working my tail off 5 hours a day!&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>J-Mike later listed other accomplishments, like never beating the crap out of a women and not stealing for over 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerfantastic</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerfantastic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This issue is not a distraction to the Packers.  It is a mere annoyance.  We will have no Stanley Wilson or Barret Robbins moments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue is not a distraction to the Packers.  It is a mere annoyance.  We will have no Stanley Wilson or Barret Robbins moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trollaikman8</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trollaikman8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green Bay needs to pull a Hosni Mubarak and kill all Twitter and Internet access or this team is going to lose before the game even starts.


//F Mubarak]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green Bay needs to pull a Hosni Mubarak and kill all Twitter and Internet access or this team is going to lose before the game even starts.</p>
<p>//F Mubarak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kcjohnson2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kcjohnson2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finley and Barnett need to grow up. They are acting unprofessionally and their actions could easily have a negative impact on their careers. Their twitter pages are entertaining and a great way to build fan relationships, however, issues regarding the team should be handled behind closed doors. If they have an issue with the team picture or with Rodgers they should call or show up in GB for a sit-down.

Rodgers was responding candidly to a question made by a reporter. I doubt it was meant to say Barnett or Finley weren&#039;t part of the team. It seems that he meant the picture should include those members who have been in the locker room in this playoff run and who will be in the locker room at the Super Bowl. Commenting on the situation was probably a bad idea, but if anyone has a right to speak on the issue it&#039;s the team&#039;s leader.

Either way, as I&#039;ve stated before, this is more of an issue on internet message boards. Rodgers&#039; comments were made in a routine interview and this &quot;story&quot; really hasn&#039;t materialized in the locker room. The only people it is affecting, negatively, are Barnett and Finley.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finley and Barnett need to grow up. They are acting unprofessionally and their actions could easily have a negative impact on their careers. Their twitter pages are entertaining and a great way to build fan relationships, however, issues regarding the team should be handled behind closed doors. If they have an issue with the team picture or with Rodgers they should call or show up in GB for a sit-down.</p>
<p>Rodgers was responding candidly to a question made by a reporter. I doubt it was meant to say Barnett or Finley weren&#8217;t part of the team. It seems that he meant the picture should include those members who have been in the locker room in this playoff run and who will be in the locker room at the Super Bowl. Commenting on the situation was probably a bad idea, but if anyone has a right to speak on the issue it&#8217;s the team&#8217;s leader.</p>
<p>Either way, as I&#8217;ve stated before, this is more of an issue on internet message boards. Rodgers&#8217; comments were made in a routine interview and this &#8220;story&#8221; really hasn&#8217;t materialized in the locker room. The only people it is affecting, negatively, are Barnett and Finley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pervyharvin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pervyharvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere, Brett Favre sits clutching his cell phone laughing at the lack of Packer leadership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere, Brett Favre sits clutching his cell phone laughing at the lack of Packer leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: footballrulz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[footballrulz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is absolutely ridiculous.  Will next Sunday ever get here?????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is absolutely ridiculous.  Will next Sunday ever get here?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwil444</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwil444]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[steeler bias on full display on this site]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>steeler bias on full display on this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stellarperformance</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stellarperformance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Hey, who wants to rehab in Green Bay and remain connected with your replacements, teammates, and coaches?&quot;

&quot;Not I, said the little red LB...not I, said the little red TE.&quot;

&quot;Hey, who wants to show up for SuperBowl credits?&quot; 

&quot;I do, said the little red LB....I do said the little red TE.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hey, who wants to rehab in Green Bay and remain connected with your replacements, teammates, and coaches?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Not I, said the little red LB&#8230;not I, said the little red TE.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, who wants to show up for SuperBowl credits?&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;I do, said the little red LB&#8230;.I do said the little red TE.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: responsiblechild</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[responsiblechild]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what we get...one week before the Super Bowl???...Kind of makes me nostalgic for the days of feet and (alleged) gutless QB&#039;s...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what we get&#8230;one week before the Super Bowl???&#8230;Kind of makes me nostalgic for the days of feet and (alleged) gutless QB&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nflnfl13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nflnfl13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw a picture of Packer players #56 &amp; #88 in of all places the Webster&#039;s dictionary. Simply looked up the word Stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw a picture of Packer players #56 &amp; #88 in of all places the Webster&#8217;s dictionary. Simply looked up the word Stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyman1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-942033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garyman1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-942033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look.... ARod was absolutely correct... but that doesn&#039;t mean he SHOULD have said it.  Sometimes it&#039;s better to keep your mouth shut.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look&#8230;. ARod was absolutely correct&#8230; but that doesn&#8217;t mean he SHOULD have said it.  Sometimes it&#8217;s better to keep your mouth shut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjjetsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cjjetsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know you Rodger&#039;s lovers (the newly converted - how do you convert a 4 to a 12 on a jersey?) out there might not like this, but this whole issue shows that Rodgers is a little out of touch with his teammates, and if not for the amazing performance he&#039;s had this playoffs, there might be a bit more smoke to questions regarding his leadership.  Guys like Nick Barnett, who have been through the wars for 9 years and are truer leaders in the traditional sense (i.e. absent the position he plays on the field), recognize that it&#039;s in their best financial interest to make sure their injuries are rehabbed 100% in order for them to keep making a living (the Packer already signed Barnett&#039;s backup to a contract extension).  

Does Rodgers really think there isn&#039;t a difference between a QB rehabbing on IR and a LB or TE?  When you have that many guys rehabbing, on top of keeping the active roster healthy enough to keep playing on a week in, week out basis, it&#039;s easy to understand that the higher quality players are going to invest in higher quality treatment (individual treatment) to ensure that their careers can continue at the highest possible level.  Once you&#039;re on IR, you&#039;re toast in terms of the team, unless you play QB (the only meaningful contributor to the weekly game plan).  So Aaron, instead of alienating some of your more important teammates to tote the company line, keep your nose in your playbook and your mouth closed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you Rodger&#8217;s lovers (the newly converted &#8211; how do you convert a 4 to a 12 on a jersey?) out there might not like this, but this whole issue shows that Rodgers is a little out of touch with his teammates, and if not for the amazing performance he&#8217;s had this playoffs, there might be a bit more smoke to questions regarding his leadership.  Guys like Nick Barnett, who have been through the wars for 9 years and are truer leaders in the traditional sense (i.e. absent the position he plays on the field), recognize that it&#8217;s in their best financial interest to make sure their injuries are rehabbed 100% in order for them to keep making a living (the Packer already signed Barnett&#8217;s backup to a contract extension).  </p>
<p>Does Rodgers really think there isn&#8217;t a difference between a QB rehabbing on IR and a LB or TE?  When you have that many guys rehabbing, on top of keeping the active roster healthy enough to keep playing on a week in, week out basis, it&#8217;s easy to understand that the higher quality players are going to invest in higher quality treatment (individual treatment) to ensure that their careers can continue at the highest possible level.  Once you&#8217;re on IR, you&#8217;re toast in terms of the team, unless you play QB (the only meaningful contributor to the weekly game plan).  So Aaron, instead of alienating some of your more important teammates to tote the company line, keep your nose in your playbook and your mouth closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zappa69</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zappa69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SHISM!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SHISM!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombrookshire</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tombrookshire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If GB management wasn&#039;t so tone deaf they would know how divisive something like this could be two weeks before the SB. Why permit such a distraction and the inevitable hard feelings that will exist between IR and active players before the biggest game of their lives? Rodgers is an idiot for opening his mouth. Just let it play out and get yourself ready to go. With some teams, (the Jets, Steelers) this would never even come up because to them, putting the entire team, IR or not, in the picture would be a no-brainer. The Packers waited to gauge the political fallout and then sheepishly changed their position to include the IR players in the pic. That is exactly how Washington does things. Why not set the bar a little higher than that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If GB management wasn&#8217;t so tone deaf they would know how divisive something like this could be two weeks before the SB. Why permit such a distraction and the inevitable hard feelings that will exist between IR and active players before the biggest game of their lives? Rodgers is an idiot for opening his mouth. Just let it play out and get yourself ready to go. With some teams, (the Jets, Steelers) this would never even come up because to them, putting the entire team, IR or not, in the picture would be a no-brainer. The Packers waited to gauge the political fallout and then sheepishly changed their position to include the IR players in the pic. That is exactly how Washington does things. Why not set the bar a little higher than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmySmith</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimmySmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For any of these posters or footballs fans that think this is a distraction to the Packers, well, that&#039;s just stupid.   They are preparing as hard or harder than the Steelers.   

In the end, the QB answered a dumb question and two IR players, who by the way will have nothing to do with the final outcome of the game next Sunday, responded via Twitter, the single dumbest invention in the world. 

One of those players (Barnett) just signed his train ticket out of town and the other mistakenly thought he was just defending himself.  Both should just shut down their Twitter accounts and behave like adults.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any of these posters or footballs fans that think this is a distraction to the Packers, well, that&#8217;s just stupid.   They are preparing as hard or harder than the Steelers.   </p>
<p>In the end, the QB answered a dumb question and two IR players, who by the way will have nothing to do with the final outcome of the game next Sunday, responded via Twitter, the single dumbest invention in the world. </p>
<p>One of those players (Barnett) just signed his train ticket out of town and the other mistakenly thought he was just defending himself.  Both should just shut down their Twitter accounts and behave like adults.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombrookshire</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tombrookshire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If management wasn&#039;t so tone deaf, they would know how divisive something like this could be at a point in time when you need absolute unity as a group to win the game. Who needs the distraction  and the inevitable hard feelings created between the IR and active players two weeks before the biggest game of their lives. Rodgers is some kind of dufus for saying anything at all. Just let this thing play out and get yourself ready. With some teams, this would never have been an issue because they would have said of course we want the entire team, IR or not, in the picture, rather than wait to gauge the fan fallout before sheepishly changing your mind and including the IR players. It is exactly what Washington does. Why couldn&#039;t the NFL standard be at least a little higher than that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If management wasn&#8217;t so tone deaf, they would know how divisive something like this could be at a point in time when you need absolute unity as a group to win the game. Who needs the distraction  and the inevitable hard feelings created between the IR and active players two weeks before the biggest game of their lives. Rodgers is some kind of dufus for saying anything at all. Just let this thing play out and get yourself ready. With some teams, this would never have been an issue because they would have said of course we want the entire team, IR or not, in the picture, rather than wait to gauge the fan fallout before sheepishly changing your mind and including the IR players. It is exactly what Washington does. Why couldn&#8217;t the NFL standard be at least a little higher than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc1958coo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc1958coo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aaron rodgers did stick up for barnett &amp; finley when he met with mc carthy! thats why they&#039;re in the photo! no one can take critism anymore]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaron rodgers did stick up for barnett &amp; finley when he met with mc carthy! thats why they&#8217;re in the photo! no one can take critism anymore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stetai</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stetai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a legit story because it really speaks of the attitude of the Packers and their head coach.

It was a mistake to exclude guys from a potential SB team photo.  Guys that have made very real contributions to this team to get them to this point.  And this is all the fallout from a dumb mistake by McCarthy.

it&#039;s devisive, disrespectful, and sends a message that the Packers only care about who&#039;s on the field at that given moment.  That&#039;s fine for a team like the Raiders or somebody, but the Packers used to be a class organization.  Not anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a legit story because it really speaks of the attitude of the Packers and their head coach.</p>
<p>It was a mistake to exclude guys from a potential SB team photo.  Guys that have made very real contributions to this team to get them to this point.  And this is all the fallout from a dumb mistake by McCarthy.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s devisive, disrespectful, and sends a message that the Packers only care about who&#8217;s on the field at that given moment.  That&#8217;s fine for a team like the Raiders or somebody, but the Packers used to be a class organization.  Not anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFTiswhatitis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...have been working my tail off 5 hrs a day ..&quot;

I know I am impressed.  I mean the guy has been working hard, 5 hrs a day!  
Hey man, the rest of us work our asses off for 8 -12 hrs a day and make a heck of a lot less than you.  STFU d-bag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;have been working my tail off 5 hrs a day ..&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I am impressed.  I mean the guy has been working hard, 5 hrs a day!<br />
Hey man, the rest of us work our asses off for 8 -12 hrs a day and make a heck of a lot less than you.  STFU d-bag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stellarperformance</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stellarperformance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The responsibility for maintaining team decorum resides with the players on this issue, and their ability to understand the ramifications of their electronic opinions. If for any reason whatsoever these players are thought of to have had a role in (the unlikely event of,) a Packers loss next week, who do you think will be among the first guys gone next year....and now their pictures are in the group photo too? ....better take two photos. 

Players that are activated for the game need to concentrate on getting the job done and deal with these uninvolved inexperienced attention-hound &quot;twits&quot; next season. 

The Pittsburgh players are laughing their asses off at the inexperience the Packers are demonstrating. Eliminate distractions! Thanks teammates. It&#039;s &quot;little&quot; things like this that get your ass kicked. 

And one last nod to Aaron. He&#039;s right and he&#039;s in charge. 

GO PACK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The responsibility for maintaining team decorum resides with the players on this issue, and their ability to understand the ramifications of their electronic opinions. If for any reason whatsoever these players are thought of to have had a role in (the unlikely event of,) a Packers loss next week, who do you think will be among the first guys gone next year&#8230;.and now their pictures are in the group photo too? &#8230;.better take two photos. </p>
<p>Players that are activated for the game need to concentrate on getting the job done and deal with these uninvolved inexperienced attention-hound &#8220;twits&#8221; next season. </p>
<p>The Pittsburgh players are laughing their asses off at the inexperience the Packers are demonstrating. Eliminate distractions! Thanks teammates. It&#8217;s &#8220;little&#8221; things like this that get your ass kicked. </p>
<p>And one last nod to Aaron. He&#8217;s right and he&#8217;s in charge. </p>
<p>GO PACK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdbragg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tdbragg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a thought . The Packers might want to consider that there is a world championship game called the Super Bowl coming up in just seven days from now . There time could be better spent worrying about their opponent who has won this very game twice in the last five years . To me , a Vince Lombardi trophy is more important than a photo . Just a thought .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thought . The Packers might want to consider that there is a world championship game called the Super Bowl coming up in just seven days from now . There time could be better spent worrying about their opponent who has won this very game twice in the last five years . To me , a Vince Lombardi trophy is more important than a photo . Just a thought .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: discosucs2005</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[discosucs2005]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jc1958coo

When there are two really good teams playing (and they are both really good teams) and one has a roster filled with Super Bowl experience, and that team is an underdog, I would say it is is pretty far away to say that is the &quot;worst bet you can make!&quot; I think even the biggest cheese heads will admit that they are 100% certain their team will win. The Jets beat the Pats, and the Colts, and the Seahawks beat the Saints. I don&#039;t think any bet you make in the playoffs is a horrible one, because upsets happen all the time. I think this game has a good chance of being extremely close (which of course means it will be a blowout) so making bold predictions just makes you look bias and stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jc1958coo</p>
<p>When there are two really good teams playing (and they are both really good teams) and one has a roster filled with Super Bowl experience, and that team is an underdog, I would say it is is pretty far away to say that is the &#8220;worst bet you can make!&#8221; I think even the biggest cheese heads will admit that they are 100% certain their team will win. The Jets beat the Pats, and the Colts, and the Seahawks beat the Saints. I don&#8217;t think any bet you make in the playoffs is a horrible one, because upsets happen all the time. I think this game has a good chance of being extremely close (which of course means it will be a blowout) so making bold predictions just makes you look bias and stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnyb216</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941924</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[johnnyb216]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think TT has assembled a group of soldiers that has nothing on their minds other than beating the steelers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think TT has assembled a group of soldiers that has nothing on their minds other than beating the steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tramonisland</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tramonisland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[goodguyjohn says:
Jan 29, 2011 10:49 PM
Pittsburg +2.5 is the best bet I’ve seen in many, many moons. All in
------------------------------------------
Sounds more like &quot;All broke&quot; to me. Pack 34 Steel 20. Go Pack Go!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goodguyjohn says:<br />
Jan 29, 2011 10:49 PM<br />
Pittsburg +2.5 is the best bet I’ve seen in many, many moons. All in<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Sounds more like &#8220;All broke&#8221; to me. Pack 34 Steel 20. Go Pack Go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: livingdangerous</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[livingdangerous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear IR players. 

Collect your money and SHUT UP! There are people who are going to play a game in a few days that need to prep for it and play to their potential with out you distractions.  SHUT UP!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear IR players. </p>
<p>Collect your money and SHUT UP! There are people who are going to play a game in a few days that need to prep for it and play to their potential with out you distractions.  SHUT UP!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmyt32</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmyt32]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finley and Barnett...way to make it all about yourselves and not the team. 
If distrations can lose a team the Super Bowl, JF and NB just did it for the Packers.
Shut up and let the team get ready for the game!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finley and Barnett&#8230;way to make it all about yourselves and not the team.<br />
If distrations can lose a team the Super Bowl, JF and NB just did it for the Packers.<br />
Shut up and let the team get ready for the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealjimmysmith</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therealjimmysmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys on injured reserve rehab away from the team all the time. Generally, trainers are more concerned about getting the guys on the active roster healthy for the next game versus doing rehab for guys that won&#039;t be playing the rest of the year.
 If Rodgers spent more time thinking before he speaks and less time working on his porn stache, this whole episode wouldn&#039;t have happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys on injured reserve rehab away from the team all the time. Generally, trainers are more concerned about getting the guys on the active roster healthy for the next game versus doing rehab for guys that won&#8217;t be playing the rest of the year.<br />
 If Rodgers spent more time thinking before he speaks and less time working on his porn stache, this whole episode wouldn&#8217;t have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisbermansdoublechin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisbermansdoublechin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodgers DEFENDS Jay Cutler, but CRITICIZES his teammates for not rehabbing in GB? Sounds like someone is starting to believe his media hupe, ... now, he&#039;s A-ROD too? He&#039;s starting to sound a little self- centered like his baseball namesake]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodgers DEFENDS Jay Cutler, but CRITICIZES his teammates for not rehabbing in GB? Sounds like someone is starting to believe his media hupe, &#8230; now, he&#8217;s A-ROD too? He&#8217;s starting to sound a little self- centered like his baseball namesake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Super Bowl team photo is for those who play in the Super Bowl. Period. When Barnett whined about being left out, McCarthy should have ignored him. And if Barnett and Finely &lt;em&gt;loved&lt;/em&gt; the Packers half as much as they seem to love their own egos, they&#039;d shut up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Super Bowl team photo is for those who play in the Super Bowl. Period. When Barnett whined about being left out, McCarthy should have ignored him. And if Barnett and Finely <em>loved</em> the Packers half as much as they seem to love their own egos, they&#8217;d shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: da11ascowboys</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/29/more-packer-photo-fallout-jermichael-finley-responds-to-rodgers/#comment-941898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[da11ascowboys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108271#comment-941898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking pictures and posting on Twitter... sounds more like a Starbucks worker than an NFL team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking pictures and posting on Twitter&#8230; sounds more like a Starbucks worker than an NFL team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
