<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maurkice Pouncey listed as &#8220;questionable&#8221; but really out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:58:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@cintiphil ...

The aides at the home have probably distributed your meds by now, so you&#039;re fast asleep dreaming of your happy boyhood during the Great Depression when the only woman with a voice was Eleanor Roosevelt. 

@Beer Cheese ...

Leavy said he felt he made a couple of bad calls--and he was very specific about which ones. They didn&#039;t impact the final score. Stop the insanity or they&#039;ll find you a room next to cintiphil&#039;s ... but yours will come with a straitjacket.

@gbfanforever ...

I think it&#039;s a toss-up and anyone counting unhatched chickens is a fool. Sounds to me like &lt;em&gt;you&#039;re&lt;/em&gt; the one being overconfident, Mr. Pot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cintiphil &#8230;</p>
<p>The aides at the home have probably distributed your meds by now, so you&#8217;re fast asleep dreaming of your happy boyhood during the Great Depression when the only woman with a voice was Eleanor Roosevelt. </p>
<p>@Beer Cheese &#8230;</p>
<p>Leavy said he felt he made a couple of bad calls&#8211;and he was very specific about which ones. They didn&#8217;t impact the final score. Stop the insanity or they&#8217;ll find you a room next to cintiphil&#8217;s &#8230; but yours will come with a straitjacket.</p>
<p>@gbfanforever &#8230;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a toss-up and anyone counting unhatched chickens is a fool. Sounds to me like <em>you&#8217;re</em> the one being overconfident, Mr. Pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frye21</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[frye21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doug Legursky will be fine. Reporters make a living on drama. With very little drama on the Steelers front to report this is about the only thing they can find. Both coaching staffs internally do not see this as a big deal because Legursky is very good.   Yes Pouncey is much better. But he&#039;s also much better than 31 other starting centers in the league. This time next year Pouncey will be considered the top center in the NFL and for a very long time.  Legursky will hopefully still be a Steeler next year however it&#039;s going to be hard for them to keep him after Sundays performance.  If Legursky was 6&#039;3 he would be a top 8 center in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Legursky will be fine. Reporters make a living on drama. With very little drama on the Steelers front to report this is about the only thing they can find. Both coaching staffs internally do not see this as a big deal because Legursky is very good.   Yes Pouncey is much better. But he&#8217;s also much better than 31 other starting centers in the league. This time next year Pouncey will be considered the top center in the NFL and for a very long time.  Legursky will hopefully still be a Steeler next year however it&#8217;s going to be hard for them to keep him after Sundays performance.  If Legursky was 6&#8217;3 he would be a top 8 center in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sakatak</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sakatak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Beer Cheese Soup
good post, agree with your comparisons and agree it should be a tough game. Both these teams deserve to be in the Super Bowl and have overcome a lot to get here. May the best team win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Beer Cheese Soup<br />
good post, agree with your comparisons and agree it should be a tough game. Both these teams deserve to be in the Super Bowl and have overcome a lot to get here. May the best team win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wycoff</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wycoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first paragraph of the last post should read as follows:

I didn’t see this gem the first read through. Do you mean “Might well have beaten you if their receivers were allowed to push-off right in front of the ref?” Maybe “Might well have beaten you if their linemen were allowed to hold with impunity?”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first paragraph of the last post should read as follows:</p>
<p>I didn’t see this gem the first read through. Do you mean “Might well have beaten you if their receivers were allowed to push-off right in front of the ref?” Maybe “Might well have beaten you if their linemen were allowed to hold with impunity?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cintiphil</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942628</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cintiphil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deb says: Jan 30, 2011 3:14 PM

@jc1958coo …

Our starting quarterback missed 25 percent of the season, and we’ve been playing with third and fourth string on the offensive line all year. The Steelers don’t make excuses. The standard is the standard. And don’t underestimate Legursky.



You again? Back into the kitchen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb says: Jan 30, 2011 3:14 PM</p>
<p>@jc1958coo …</p>
<p>Our starting quarterback missed 25 percent of the season, and we’ve been playing with third and fourth string on the offensive line all year. The Steelers don’t make excuses. The standard is the standard. And don’t underestimate Legursky.</p>
<p>You again? Back into the kitchen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beer Cheese Soup</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beer Cheese Soup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 23:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nickster2k says:

as I’m sure the Packers fans already plan on using officiating as an excuse as that seems to be trend when losing to Pittsburgh.
______________

When the lead official himself came out and admit that the Seattle part-time fans were correct, common sense would imply MAYBE there&#039;s some reason that.

Oh wait, Steelers fan.. no common sense... Sorry about that.

You face a real team this year people. With a rich history just like your own. We don&#039;t play in the NFC Worst. We don&#039;t need a dome in a warm climate. We know how to play smash mouth defense. We have quite a few refs of our own that give us calls they shouldn&#039;t, just as the Steelers do. We mowed through the playoffs, all on the road as the 6 seed. We humiliated our biggest rival along the way. Sound familiar?

This ain&#039;t Arizona you&#039;re about to face. It isn&#039;t the overrated &#039;05 Seattle team that might well have beaten you had they been allowed to play. This is a team that really is a lot like the Steelers. 

Therefore, just as I give the Steelers their due (at least this year, not in &#039;05), you&#039;re making a big mistake by underestimating the Pack this year. It&#039;s gonna be a very tough game, regardless of who wins.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nickster2k says:</p>
<p>as I’m sure the Packers fans already plan on using officiating as an excuse as that seems to be trend when losing to Pittsburgh.<br />
______________</p>
<p>When the lead official himself came out and admit that the Seattle part-time fans were correct, common sense would imply MAYBE there&#8217;s some reason that.</p>
<p>Oh wait, Steelers fan.. no common sense&#8230; Sorry about that.</p>
<p>You face a real team this year people. With a rich history just like your own. We don&#8217;t play in the NFC Worst. We don&#8217;t need a dome in a warm climate. We know how to play smash mouth defense. We have quite a few refs of our own that give us calls they shouldn&#8217;t, just as the Steelers do. We mowed through the playoffs, all on the road as the 6 seed. We humiliated our biggest rival along the way. Sound familiar?</p>
<p>This ain&#8217;t Arizona you&#8217;re about to face. It isn&#8217;t the overrated &#8217;05 Seattle team that might well have beaten you had they been allowed to play. This is a team that really is a lot like the Steelers. </p>
<p>Therefore, just as I give the Steelers their due (at least this year, not in &#8217;05), you&#8217;re making a big mistake by underestimating the Pack this year. It&#8217;s gonna be a very tough game, regardless of who wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gbfanforever</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gbfanforever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jrmbadger says: Jan 30, 2011 2:02 PM

“..the Steelers haven’t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet. They lost to both NO and the Patriots.”

Tom Brady &gt; Drew Brees &gt; Aaron Rodgers.
----------------------------------------------------
steeler fan overconfidence is so amusing. All of their big wins have been eked out at home on that lousy turf. They have yet to be impressive but live off of their reputation. Missing the center will hurt against the capers D.  Because Raji will live in the backfield now without a double team, Cullen Jenkins, Clay and others will be put in very favorable match ups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jrmbadger says: Jan 30, 2011 2:02 PM</p>
<p>“..the Steelers haven’t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet. They lost to both NO and the Patriots.”</p>
<p>Tom Brady &gt; Drew Brees &gt; Aaron Rodgers.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
steeler fan overconfidence is so amusing. All of their big wins have been eked out at home on that lousy turf. They have yet to be impressive but live off of their reputation. Missing the center will hurt against the capers D.  Because Raji will live in the backfield now without a double team, Cullen Jenkins, Clay and others will be put in very favorable match ups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelnucs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelnucs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jamson64 says: Jan 30, 2011 3:33 PM

4sacroc

—————————————

Re: that lousy Jets defense. You mean the one that was the third best in the entire league? That one?

===========================

Exactly.  Most of Mendenhall&#039;s yards came with Legursky in the game.   Of course I wish that Pouncey was playing.  Not as big a dropoff as people think.  

@ cletusvandam - 

Dude!  The Shield, the best show ever on TV.  You&#039;re the man!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jamson64 says: Jan 30, 2011 3:33 PM</p>
<p>4sacroc</p>
<p>—————————————</p>
<p>Re: that lousy Jets defense. You mean the one that was the third best in the entire league? That one?</p>
<p>===========================</p>
<p>Exactly.  Most of Mendenhall&#8217;s yards came with Legursky in the game.   Of course I wish that Pouncey was playing.  Not as big a dropoff as people think.  </p>
<p>@ cletusvandam &#8211; </p>
<p>Dude!  The Shield, the best show ever on TV.  You&#8217;re the man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laxer37</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laxer37]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep in mind the Steelers starting center was an unimpressive Justin Hartwig when they beat the Packers a year ago racking up almost 600 yards of offense.

This is the same Justin Hartwig that was waived in early September in favor of Legursky as the backup to Pouncy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind the Steelers starting center was an unimpressive Justin Hartwig when they beat the Packers a year ago racking up almost 600 yards of offense.</p>
<p>This is the same Justin Hartwig that was waived in early September in favor of Legursky as the backup to Pouncy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteelTown6</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SteelTown6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jrmbadger says: Jan 30, 2011 2:02 PM

&quot;..the Steelers haven’t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet. They lost to both NO and the Patriots.&quot;

Tom Brady &gt; Drew Brees &gt; Aaron Rodgers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jrmbadger says: Jan 30, 2011 2:02 PM</p>
<p>&#8220;..the Steelers haven’t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet. They lost to both NO and the Patriots.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tom Brady &gt; Drew Brees &gt; Aaron Rodgers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamson64</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamson64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4sacroc


---------------------------------------

Re: that lousy Jets defense. You mean the one that  was the third best in the entire league? That one?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4sacroc</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Re: that lousy Jets defense. You mean the one that  was the third best in the entire league? That one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Burton</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Burton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Big Legursky will hold his own, where was Shawn Ellis in that Jets game? He disappeared like Eric Smith and Bart Scott.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big Legursky will hold his own, where was Shawn Ellis in that Jets game? He disappeared like Eric Smith and Bart Scott.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmysee</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmysee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bigcid10 says: 
Jan 30, 2011 2:53 PM 
keep addin fuel to the fire
Legursky going to open a can of woopass on BJ
Go Steelers!

------------------------------------------------

A can won&#039;t do it -- he&#039;d need at least a 6-pack, maybe more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bigcid10 says:<br />
Jan 30, 2011 2:53 PM<br />
keep addin fuel to the fire<br />
Legursky going to open a can of woopass on BJ<br />
Go Steelers!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>A can won&#8217;t do it &#8212; he&#8217;d need at least a 6-pack, maybe more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jc1958coo ...

Our starting quarterback missed 25 percent of the season, and we&#039;ve been playing with third and fourth string on the offensive line all year. The Steelers don&#039;t make excuses. The standard is the standard. And don&#039;t underestimate Legursky.

But you just keep counting those unhatched chickens, baby.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jc1958coo &#8230;</p>
<p>Our starting quarterback missed 25 percent of the season, and we&#8217;ve been playing with third and fourth string on the offensive line all year. The Steelers don&#8217;t make excuses. The standard is the standard. And don&#8217;t underestimate Legursky.</p>
<p>But you just keep counting those unhatched chickens, baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sacram3ntal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sacram3ntal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m pulling for the Packers, but you&#039;ve got to feel for Pouncey.

He was a mauler all year, and to get knocked out just before the Super Bowl is just sh*te luck.

I can&#039;t pretend to know anything about the &quot;drop-off&quot; to Legursky, but Pack fans hoping this leads to an easy win just need to look at our own team-
plenty of examples of unheralded replacements stepping up big time when the chips are down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pulling for the Packers, but you&#8217;ve got to feel for Pouncey.</p>
<p>He was a mauler all year, and to get knocked out just before the Super Bowl is just sh*te luck.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t pretend to know anything about the &#8220;drop-off&#8221; to Legursky, but Pack fans hoping this leads to an easy win just need to look at our own team-<br />
plenty of examples of unheralded replacements stepping up big time when the chips are down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwil444</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942426</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwil444]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, a real football story!  nice!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, a real football story!  nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigcid10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigcid10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[keep addin fuel to the fire
Legursky going to open a can of woopass on BJ 
Go Steelers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>keep addin fuel to the fire<br />
Legursky going to open a can of woopass on BJ<br />
Go Steelers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cletusvandam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cletusvandam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cutler would play]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cutler would play</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickster2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickster2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jc1958coo says:
Jan 30, 2011 12:58 PM
now the steelers have an excuse when green bay is done whoopin #ss! 34-24 packers not even close!

===========================

as I&#039;m sure the Packers fans already plan on using officiating as an excuse as that seems to be trend when losing to Pittsburgh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jc1958coo says:<br />
Jan 30, 2011 12:58 PM<br />
now the steelers have an excuse when green bay is done whoopin #ss! 34-24 packers not even close!</p>
<p>===========================</p>
<p>as I&#8217;m sure the Packers fans already plan on using officiating as an excuse as that seems to be trend when losing to Pittsburgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fancyleague says: 
Jan 30, 2011 1:13 PM 
34-24? The Packers scored 14 on the Bears D.



what you fail to realize is that the Bears just matchup well against the pack.  I wouldn&#039;t count on a similar performance from your Steelers.  Esp. considering that the Steelers haven&#039;t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet.  They lost to both NO and the Patriots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fancyleague says:<br />
Jan 30, 2011 1:13 PM<br />
34-24? The Packers scored 14 on the Bears D.</p>
<p>what you fail to realize is that the Bears just matchup well against the pack.  I wouldn&#8217;t count on a similar performance from your Steelers.  Esp. considering that the Steelers haven&#8217;t managed to stop a top 10 passing attack yet.  They lost to both NO and the Patriots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickster2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickster2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still not convinced that he won&#039;t play.  His cast was removed yesterday and he is in a walking boot.  He also said that he played a week after a similar injury in college and he didn&#039;t miss any time earlier this year with an ankle sprain.  I think he&#039;ll do anything he can to get on the field-- but they&#039;ll at least give him until the last minute to make a decision either way.

Adam Schefter is a little POS that rarely knows what he&#039;s talking about.  Unfortunately there is no longer any effort by these so called journalists to get their facts right before reporting on a story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still not convinced that he won&#8217;t play.  His cast was removed yesterday and he is in a walking boot.  He also said that he played a week after a similar injury in college and he didn&#8217;t miss any time earlier this year with an ankle sprain.  I think he&#8217;ll do anything he can to get on the field&#8211; but they&#8217;ll at least give him until the last minute to make a decision either way.</p>
<p>Adam Schefter is a little POS that rarely knows what he&#8217;s talking about.  Unfortunately there is no longer any effort by these so called journalists to get their facts right before reporting on a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4sacroc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4sacroc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the Steelers actually scored a whopping 17 on the lousy Jets D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Steelers actually scored a whopping 17 on the lousy Jets D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4sacroc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4sacroc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whaddya know:  An actual NEWS story on PFT!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whaddya know:  An actual NEWS story on PFT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heyzeus143</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heyzeus143]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[legursky is tougher and stronger than most cheeseheads know]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>legursky is tougher and stronger than most cheeseheads know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamson64</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamson64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JC1998  

see fancyleague&#039;s post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC1998  </p>
<p>see fancyleague&#8217;s post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamson64</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamson64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jc1958- were you born in 58? you talk smack like a 12 year old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jc1958- were you born in 58? you talk smack like a 12 year old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fancyleague</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fancyleague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[34-24? The Packers scored 14 on the Bears D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>34-24? The Packers scored 14 on the Bears D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenstrange</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[citizenstrange]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pouncey had a HUGE impact in his rookie year. The Steelers hit a grandslam homerun with that pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pouncey had a HUGE impact in his rookie year. The Steelers hit a grandslam homerun with that pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goawayeverybody</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goawayeverybody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go Packers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Packers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletaldrawing</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/30/maurkice-pouncey-listed-as-questionable-but-really-out/#comment-942282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skeletaldrawing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108321#comment-942282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is obviously a huge boon to the Packers, although I feel for Pouncey - no one wants to miss the biggest game of their career due to injury.

To be sure, Legursky is no match for Raji.  This should not only lead to more sacks, but generally help the Pack to contain both the run and pass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is obviously a huge boon to the Packers, although I feel for Pouncey &#8211; no one wants to miss the biggest game of their career due to injury.</p>
<p>To be sure, Legursky is no match for Raji.  This should not only lead to more sacks, but generally help the Pack to contain both the run and pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
