<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl Week 10-pack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: polishkingski</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-950603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polishkingski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-950603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[every once in a great while i get a feeling come superbowl sunday that you can throw out all the stats, team history, injuries and the other stuff used to compare the two opponents. what matters most come sunday is which team is blasting on all cylinders. the past few weeks it looks like GB is a machine grinding up teams into pulp. i gotta feeling their gonna be unstoppable on offence and will have more than enough defence to not allow the steelers to keep pace. i hope not coz i`d rather have a good game and enjoy keeping an eye on my 15 SB squares (for recreational purposes only).  final score?  GB31  PITTS9.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every once in a great while i get a feeling come superbowl sunday that you can throw out all the stats, team history, injuries and the other stuff used to compare the two opponents. what matters most come sunday is which team is blasting on all cylinders. the past few weeks it looks like GB is a machine grinding up teams into pulp. i gotta feeling their gonna be unstoppable on offence and will have more than enough defence to not allow the steelers to keep pace. i hope not coz i`d rather have a good game and enjoy keeping an eye on my 15 SB squares (for recreational purposes only).  final score?  GB31  PITTS9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thereisnoiinteam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-947834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thereisnoiinteam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 05:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-947834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jrmbadger says: 
Jan 31, 2011 2:15 PM 
“spyboots says:
Jan 31, 2011 1:18 PM
The IR number above is misleading, though. Of those 15 IR’d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters. The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.”

Umm…. no (just off the top of my head):

Jermichael Finley (starter)
Morgan Burnett (starter)
Nick Barnett (starter)
Ryan Grant (starter)
Mark Tauscher (starter)
Brad Jones (starter)

_________________________
180 games missed by all players not including Al Harris (CB) &amp; Johnny Jolly (DT) who did not count in the IR numbers. Their replacement starters also got hurt and missed games like

Atari Bigby missed much of the season.
Aaron Rodgers missed 1.5 games.
Cullen Jenkins missed a few games.
Brandon Chillar (LB) missed much of the season and was a starter.
Donald Driver missed a couple of games.
Mike Neal (DE) was to be a significant lineman hardly played.
Brady Poppinga (LB) was an occasional starter and went on IR early.
Ryan Pickett (DL) missed several games.
Frank Zombo became a started and has missed several games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jrmbadger says:<br />
Jan 31, 2011 2:15 PM<br />
“spyboots says:<br />
Jan 31, 2011 1:18 PM<br />
The IR number above is misleading, though. Of those 15 IR’d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters. The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.”</p>
<p>Umm…. no (just off the top of my head):</p>
<p>Jermichael Finley (starter)<br />
Morgan Burnett (starter)<br />
Nick Barnett (starter)<br />
Ryan Grant (starter)<br />
Mark Tauscher (starter)<br />
Brad Jones (starter)</p>
<p>_________________________<br />
180 games missed by all players not including Al Harris (CB) &amp; Johnny Jolly (DT) who did not count in the IR numbers. Their replacement starters also got hurt and missed games like</p>
<p>Atari Bigby missed much of the season.<br />
Aaron Rodgers missed 1.5 games.<br />
Cullen Jenkins missed a few games.<br />
Brandon Chillar (LB) missed much of the season and was a starter.<br />
Donald Driver missed a couple of games.<br />
Mike Neal (DE) was to be a significant lineman hardly played.<br />
Brady Poppinga (LB) was an occasional starter and went on IR early.<br />
Ryan Pickett (DL) missed several games.<br />
Frank Zombo became a started and has missed several games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newreality1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-945463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newreality1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-945463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two work,in town mentalities  and smaller city venues in the BIG GAME. Thats why I love football,because no matter how much money you have, you cant buy a championship. I thank jerry jones for building  a nice stadium for us to play in. Im sure the cheese heads and stealer nation will enjoy the amenities.  We dont even have cheerleaders to send to the game.  Hot damn , those sure are some fancy seats in that godarn stadium.  I hope they got plenty of beer because this aint the sushie crowd comin. Bring the cheese hats and yellow towels and lets GET IT ON!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two work,in town mentalities  and smaller city venues in the BIG GAME. Thats why I love football,because no matter how much money you have, you cant buy a championship. I thank jerry jones for building  a nice stadium for us to play in. Im sure the cheese heads and stealer nation will enjoy the amenities.  We dont even have cheerleaders to send to the game.  Hot damn , those sure are some fancy seats in that godarn stadium.  I hope they got plenty of beer because this aint the sushie crowd comin. Bring the cheese hats and yellow towels and lets GET IT ON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad3004560</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dad3004560]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the chatter is here is ridiculous.  This worse than watching the game with my wife and kids.  Only this year I have an ace up my sleeve.  I am going to download super bowl commercial bingo on all there phones and watch the game in peace.  They&#039;re entertained and so am I.  Besides we all know the Pack is going to win anyway; more salt in Favre&#039;s wounds.  It&#039;s to perfect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the chatter is here is ridiculous.  This worse than watching the game with my wife and kids.  Only this year I have an ace up my sleeve.  I am going to download super bowl commercial bingo on all there phones and watch the game in peace.  They&#8217;re entertained and so am I.  Besides we all know the Pack is going to win anyway; more salt in Favre&#8217;s wounds.  It&#8217;s to perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask a Republican about the NFL and he will call it “socialism” since all the revenues are split amongst the members of the league.

Not only that, the practice of awarding the last pick in the draft to the Super Bowl champ would be decried as “punishing success” by those same folks.

My pick–PACKERS 23 STEELERS 17

Of course a Republican would see the NFL as one business entity and is entitled to shift funds as it sees fit. Of course Dems/Progressives would call this anti-trust and bust it up if it suited them to, but treat as one entity when it suits it for some other interventionist purpose. Consistency isn&#039;t their strong suit.

Obviously being a Packer fan I have to favor revenue sharing because without it my team wouldn&#039;t exist.
 
I do have a problem with taxpayer subsidized stadiums anywhere. It&#039;s a scandal that a multi-Billion dollar business with 32 multimillion dollar branch units who pay it&#039;s top employees several million dollars a year have to shake down the taxpayers for places to play. But I guess when you turn on the socialist tap it&#039;s going to keep running until the &quot;water&quot; runs out, which at this pace should be sometime in 2012. Fitting since the owners and players are going to call it quits for a year trying to figure how to split their subsidy-enhanced pie.

Oh, the game will be 
Pack 34
Steelers 20]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask a Republican about the NFL and he will call it “socialism” since all the revenues are split amongst the members of the league.</p>
<p>Not only that, the practice of awarding the last pick in the draft to the Super Bowl champ would be decried as “punishing success” by those same folks.</p>
<p>My pick–PACKERS 23 STEELERS 17</p>
<p>Of course a Republican would see the NFL as one business entity and is entitled to shift funds as it sees fit. Of course Dems/Progressives would call this anti-trust and bust it up if it suited them to, but treat as one entity when it suits it for some other interventionist purpose. Consistency isn&#8217;t their strong suit.</p>
<p>Obviously being a Packer fan I have to favor revenue sharing because without it my team wouldn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>I do have a problem with taxpayer subsidized stadiums anywhere. It&#8217;s a scandal that a multi-Billion dollar business with 32 multimillion dollar branch units who pay it&#8217;s top employees several million dollars a year have to shake down the taxpayers for places to play. But I guess when you turn on the socialist tap it&#8217;s going to keep running until the &#8220;water&#8221; runs out, which at this pace should be sometime in 2012. Fitting since the owners and players are going to call it quits for a year trying to figure how to split their subsidy-enhanced pie.</p>
<p>Oh, the game will be<br />
Pack 34<br />
Steelers 20</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluestree</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluestree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan says: 
Jan 31, 2011 11:00 AM 
I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but… When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though…
------------------------------------------

Just sayin&#039; they&#039;re due.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rabidbillsfan says:<br />
Jan 31, 2011 11:00 AM<br />
I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but… When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though…<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217; they&#8217;re due.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electstat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[electstat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you should have paid attention to baseball before trying to compare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should have paid attention to baseball before trying to compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;spyboots says: 
Jan 31, 2011 1:18 PM 
The IR number above is misleading, though. Of those 15 IR’d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters. The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.&quot;

Umm.... no (just off the top of my head):

Jermichael Finley (starter)
Morgan Burnett (starter)
Nick Barnett (starter)
Ryan Grant (starter)
Mark Tauscher (starter)
Brad Jones (starter)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;spyboots says:<br />
Jan 31, 2011 1:18 PM<br />
The IR number above is misleading, though. Of those 15 IR’d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters. The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm&#8230;. no (just off the top of my head):</p>
<p>Jermichael Finley (starter)<br />
Morgan Burnett (starter)<br />
Nick Barnett (starter)<br />
Ryan Grant (starter)<br />
Mark Tauscher (starter)<br />
Brad Jones (starter)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyboots</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spyboots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The IR number above is misleading, though.  Of those 15 IR&#039;d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters.  The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IR number above is misleading, though.  Of those 15 IR&#8217;d for GB, it appears there are only 3 starters.  The Steelers have more than 3 starters injured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theo547</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theo547]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@rabidbillsfan

I said &quot;Started&quot; - Rodgers actually almost won that game for us... but, he didnt start it. i think it was 21-7 when he came in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rabidbillsfan</p>
<p>I said &#8220;Started&#8221; &#8211; Rodgers actually almost won that game for us&#8230; but, he didnt start it. i think it was 21-7 when he came in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: limey41</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[limey41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@steelermichele
your are talking about two different time oeriod

   #7 pre 2008

   #8 postb 2008]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@steelermichele<br />
your are talking about two different time oeriod</p>
<p>   #7 pre 2008</p>
<p>   #8 postb 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youboettcha</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[youboettcha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@rabidbillsfan

All those games were against the Cowboys in Irving, Texas.  This game is for the Super Bowl in Arlington, against the Steelers.  I don&#039;t think anything you said is applicable to the situation whatsoever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rabidbillsfan</p>
<p>All those games were against the Cowboys in Irving, Texas.  This game is for the Super Bowl in Arlington, against the Steelers.  I don&#8217;t think anything you said is applicable to the situation whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelersmichele</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelersmichele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[#7: During that same stretch, the Steelers have played only two games in domes, struggling to beat a bad Lions team in 2009 and losing to the Saints in 2010…[the Steelers are] better suited to open air.

#8: In their 2005 Super Bowl run, the Steelers beat the Colts in a dome during the division round and the Seahawks in a dome during the Super Bowl.

Seriously, do you ever read what you’ve written?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7: During that same stretch, the Steelers have played only two games in domes, struggling to beat a bad Lions team in 2009 and losing to the Saints in 2010…[the Steelers are] better suited to open air.</p>
<p>#8: In their 2005 Super Bowl run, the Steelers beat the Colts in a dome during the division round and the Seahawks in a dome during the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>Seriously, do you ever read what you’ve written?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpartaChris</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SpartaChris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; Ideally, someone from the P.R. staff should have realized that players like Jermichael Finley and Nick Barnett would not have taken the exclusion quietly, and in turn should have recommended — strongly — to the coaching staff that all players be included in all Super Bowl activities.&lt;/i&gt;

OR they should have realized these guys are self promoting whiners and told them there will be a fine and possible suspension for any team business that makes it way to social media outlets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Ideally, someone from the P.R. staff should have realized that players like Jermichael Finley and Nick Barnett would not have taken the exclusion quietly, and in turn should have recommended — strongly — to the coaching staff that all players be included in all Super Bowl activities.</i></p>
<p>OR they should have realized these guys are self promoting whiners and told them there will be a fine and possible suspension for any team business that makes it way to social media outlets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidbillsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ theo547
Brett was actually knocked out of the game in 2007, and Rodgers came. I mean he played well, but they still lost. This could actually be a good thing, maybe the players can use it as a little outside motivation. Either way I still hope the pack crushes Pitt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ theo547<br />
Brett was actually knocked out of the game in 2007, and Rodgers came. I mean he played well, but they still lost. This could actually be a good thing, maybe the players can use it as a little outside motivation. Either way I still hope the pack crushes Pitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bordner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bordner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan says: 
Jan 31, 2011 11:00 AM 

I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but… When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though…
-------------------------------------------------
You&#039;re right!!!  What a genius!!!!  How could everyone else have missed this??!!!!!

This is an absolute, positive sign that the Packers will lose the Super Bowl!!!!!  Their team hasn&#039;t beaten the Cowboys in Dallas since the day before Christmas 21 years ago!!!  They have no chance!!!  They shouldn&#039;t even bother to show up - the game has already been pre-determined based on their history with mostly different players playing a team that isn&#039;t even in the game at a totally different stadium!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rabidbillsfan says:<br />
Jan 31, 2011 11:00 AM </p>
<p>I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but… When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though…<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
You&#8217;re right!!!  What a genius!!!!  How could everyone else have missed this??!!!!!</p>
<p>This is an absolute, positive sign that the Packers will lose the Super Bowl!!!!!  Their team hasn&#8217;t beaten the Cowboys in Dallas since the day before Christmas 21 years ago!!!  They have no chance!!!  They shouldn&#8217;t even bother to show up &#8211; the game has already been pre-determined based on their history with mostly different players playing a team that isn&#8217;t even in the game at a totally different stadium!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crimhollingsworth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crimhollingsworth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should have thought of a better item for #10. how about talented DT for GB vs a bum C for Pitt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have thought of a better item for #10. how about talented DT for GB vs a bum C for Pitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firethorn1001</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[firethorn1001]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@rabidbillsfan

And the last time the Packers won at Philadelphia prior to this season was 1962.

I too can come up with meaningless facts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rabidbillsfan</p>
<p>And the last time the Packers won at Philadelphia prior to this season was 1962.</p>
<p>I too can come up with meaningless facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theo547</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theo547]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ rabidbillsfan

- Yes... and everygame weve played there has had Brett &quot;Let me show you my wang&quot; Favre as the starter... and lets face it... Dallas had there way with him for most of his time in GB.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ rabidbillsfan</p>
<p>- Yes&#8230; and everygame weve played there has had Brett &#8220;Let me show you my wang&#8221; Favre as the starter&#8230; and lets face it&#8230; Dallas had there way with him for most of his time in GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidbillsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943194</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rabidbillsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but... When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant belive no one has mentioned this already but&#8230; When was the last time the packers won in dallas? 12/24/89. Just sayin though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theo547</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theo547]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im guessing you didnt watch Kapinos put atall last year - or for that matter any of GB&#039;s special teams.... THEY ARE HORRIBLE!  

Kapinos: They are really bad

Steelers: We know

Kapinos: What am I doing here then?

Steelers: Hopefully something productive


Go Pack.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im guessing you didnt watch Kapinos put atall last year &#8211; or for that matter any of GB&#8217;s special teams&#8230;. THEY ARE HORRIBLE!  </p>
<p>Kapinos: They are really bad</p>
<p>Steelers: We know</p>
<p>Kapinos: What am I doing here then?</p>
<p>Steelers: Hopefully something productive</p>
<p>Go Pack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peopletrains</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[peopletrains]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really? We&#039;re still reading articles about the Super Bowl photo snub that has been resolved?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? We&#8217;re still reading articles about the Super Bowl photo snub that has been resolved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calloustongue</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calloustongue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photogate won&#039;t die, because you won&#039;t let it.  Anyone I&#039;ve talked to that doesn&#039;t visit this site, hasn&#039;t even heard a word about it.  It&#039;s nbd, but if it gets you hits and makes the Steeler fans think they have a chance, I guess more power to ya.

Being critical of how the Packers handled their 15 guys on IR, and still making the Super Bowl is asinine.  Instead of bashing them, maybe you should give TT some credit for building a team with unbelievable depth, and the coaching staff credit for making UDFA look like 1st round picks.

I know you don&#039;t want to focus on the story that will have the biggest impact on the game.

Raji vs. Legursky.  Raji is playing like the best NT in the game atm.  He brings constant pressure from the middle.  Couple that with Matthews from the right and Jenkins from the left.

Keep ignoring it though, Steeler fans and you can bury their heads in the sand and think something like a team photo will help you win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photogate won&#8217;t die, because you won&#8217;t let it.  Anyone I&#8217;ve talked to that doesn&#8217;t visit this site, hasn&#8217;t even heard a word about it.  It&#8217;s nbd, but if it gets you hits and makes the Steeler fans think they have a chance, I guess more power to ya.</p>
<p>Being critical of how the Packers handled their 15 guys on IR, and still making the Super Bowl is asinine.  Instead of bashing them, maybe you should give TT some credit for building a team with unbelievable depth, and the coaching staff credit for making UDFA look like 1st round picks.</p>
<p>I know you don&#8217;t want to focus on the story that will have the biggest impact on the game.</p>
<p>Raji vs. Legursky.  Raji is playing like the best NT in the game atm.  He brings constant pressure from the middle.  Couple that with Matthews from the right and Jenkins from the left.</p>
<p>Keep ignoring it though, Steeler fans and you can bury their heads in the sand and think something like a team photo will help you win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohenry78</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ohenry78]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ryan Grant may have been able to be back by now. But Jermichael Finley got a staph infection after his knee surgery, and he&#039;s absolutely not ready to play yet. And let&#039;s be honest, while Finley coming back would be big, Grant wouldn&#039;t do any better behind the Packers&#039; O-line than Starks has.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Grant may have been able to be back by now. But Jermichael Finley got a staph infection after his knee surgery, and he&#8217;s absolutely not ready to play yet. And let&#8217;s be honest, while Finley coming back would be big, Grant wouldn&#8217;t do any better behind the Packers&#8217; O-line than Starks has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pftisahalftruth</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pftisahalftruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[your bit about GB saving roster spots is ridiculous!!!  obviously you were stretching to get 10 items into this (see; punter discussion), but get real!  GB had 15 guys go to IR.  now you want to save 2 desperately needed bodies for a late push when at the time it wasn&#039;t clear if they would or wouldn&#039;t be ready for a deep playoff run.  and to compare the GB situation to PIT is dumb; how many guys do the Steelers have on IR??!  HACK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your bit about GB saving roster spots is ridiculous!!!  obviously you were stretching to get 10 items into this (see; punter discussion), but get real!  GB had 15 guys go to IR.  now you want to save 2 desperately needed bodies for a late push when at the time it wasn&#8217;t clear if they would or wouldn&#8217;t be ready for a deep playoff run.  and to compare the GB situation to PIT is dumb; how many guys do the Steelers have on IR??!  HACK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masteel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[masteel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um ....it&#039;s been written and written all over Pittsburgh press that Aaron Smith and Pouncey will not be available.  

I&#039;ve stated that the best option for Steelers with Smith not being able to play - is put him IR the day before the SB, and have him make a heartfelt speech to all his teammates about the fact that he would (tried) to do anything he could to get back on the active roster as a healhty player AND ultimately couldn&#039;t .....so Aaron can ask him teammates to do what he is SO anxious to do himself.  Play and Win.  Do it for the Smith (Gipper). 

I&#039;m being sincere, the team and players completely trust, respect, and love Smith for his selfless playing style and his team first attitude.

GO Steelers !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um &#8230;.it&#8217;s been written and written all over Pittsburgh press that Aaron Smith and Pouncey will not be available.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve stated that the best option for Steelers with Smith not being able to play &#8211; is put him IR the day before the SB, and have him make a heartfelt speech to all his teammates about the fact that he would (tried) to do anything he could to get back on the active roster as a healhty player AND ultimately couldn&#8217;t &#8230;..so Aaron can ask him teammates to do what he is SO anxious to do himself.  Play and Win.  Do it for the Smith (Gipper). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m being sincere, the team and players completely trust, respect, and love Smith for his selfless playing style and his team first attitude.</p>
<p>GO Steelers !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluestree</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluestree]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being familiar with Jeremy Kapinos work, I&#039;d say any way you slice it, he&#039;s a plus for the Packers. 
As far as inside info, I think the Steelers know that the Packers know that he played for them last season. How could the Steelers act on anything he tells them, knowing Green Bay likely self-scouted and changed up some things, as all teams do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being familiar with Jeremy Kapinos work, I&#8217;d say any way you slice it, he&#8217;s a plus for the Packers.<br />
As far as inside info, I think the Steelers know that the Packers know that he played for them last season. How could the Steelers act on anything he tells them, knowing Green Bay likely self-scouted and changed up some things, as all teams do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: henrypuppyhead</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[henrypuppyhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kapinos.  The new Henry Burris.  

Just a absolutely horrible punter.  Pretty sure he&#039;ll be an advantage for the Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kapinos.  The new Henry Burris.  </p>
<p>Just a absolutely horrible punter.  Pretty sure he&#8217;ll be an advantage for the Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintonportisheadd</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clintonportisheadd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask a Republican about the NFL and he will call it &quot;socialism&quot; since all the revenues are split amongst the members of the league.

Not only that, the practice of awarding the last pick in the draft to the Super Bowl champ would be decried as &quot;punishing success&quot; by those same folks.

My pick--PACKERS 23 STEELERS 17]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask a Republican about the NFL and he will call it &#8220;socialism&#8221; since all the revenues are split amongst the members of the league.</p>
<p>Not only that, the practice of awarding the last pick in the draft to the Super Bowl champ would be decried as &#8220;punishing success&#8221; by those same folks.</p>
<p>My pick&#8211;PACKERS 23 STEELERS 17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc1958coo</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/31/super-bowl-week-10-pac/#comment-943058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc1958coo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=108424#comment-943058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kampinos will lose the game for pittsburgh! he&#039;ll miss hit one or two and the pack will get a big run back!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kampinos will lose the game for pittsburgh! he&#8217;ll miss hit one or two and the pack will get a big run back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
