<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tomlin confirms that Maurkice Pouncey is out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 03:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeronkrabbe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-952953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeronkrabbe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-952953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....mmmm....Suzy Kolber.....
I wanna kiss you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.mmmm&#8230;.Suzy Kolber&#8230;..<br />
I wanna kiss you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itwasagoodrun</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-951400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[itwasagoodrun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-951400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pouncey is a bigger loss than all 16 ir packers combined. Pittsburg has more to overcome but will still win because Ben has the &quot;it&quot; factor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pouncey is a bigger loss than all 16 ir packers combined. Pittsburg has more to overcome but will still win because Ben has the &#8220;it&#8221; factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubby Brister</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-951168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bubby Brister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-951168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Ben is tough to bring down but is also the slowest QB in the league…probably by FAR.&quot;

Without question one of the most insanely idiotic comments I&#039;ve ever seen on this site. And that&#039;s really saying something. Congratulations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ben is tough to bring down but is also the slowest QB in the league…probably by FAR.&#8221;</p>
<p>Without question one of the most insanely idiotic comments I&#8217;ve ever seen on this site. And that&#8217;s really saying something. Congratulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expatpatfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[expatpatfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legursky and Ben also fumbled some exchanges, one of which lead to a safety.  Sure, getting two weeks of practice helps some, but it&#039;s not a panacea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legursky and Ben also fumbled some exchanges, one of which lead to a safety.  Sure, getting two weeks of practice helps some, but it&#8217;s not a panacea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hscorpio</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hscorpio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, at least Legursky and Roethlisberger had time to work out the center exchange.  

I would hope so anyways.  

Use of the shotgun may be something of an adventure.  Especially if Raji plays like he has for the last 8 games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least Legursky and Roethlisberger had time to work out the center exchange.  </p>
<p>I would hope so anyways.  </p>
<p>Use of the shotgun may be something of an adventure.  Especially if Raji plays like he has for the last 8 games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: showmeyourtds</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[showmeyourtds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 22:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These boards are filled with a bunch of clueless football fans, that probably never played at any level. I&#039;ll be curious if the Steelers lose, how many of the same people talking trash, will be to chicken$hit to show back up on here. I loo forward to a good game and anyone that thinks it will more than a 3-7 point game is an idiot!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These boards are filled with a bunch of clueless football fans, that probably never played at any level. I&#8217;ll be curious if the Steelers lose, how many of the same people talking trash, will be to chicken$hit to show back up on here. I loo forward to a good game and anyone that thinks it will more than a 3-7 point game is an idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pigspigspigspigs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950925</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pigspigspigspigs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jrmbadger

im not sure if you have watched any steeler games but the main point was that teams were able to dominate the line of scrimmage with their defensive line creating havoc in the backfield which did not even give the steelers a chance to worry about getting to the linebacker level...this game seems like they will be able to...

im not saying that Pittsburgh will dominate the line of scrimmage; the Packers front seven is still the better unit. What I&#039;m saying is that if Pittsburgh had to choose a top five defensive front to play against, they may choose the Packers because of the style. The great equalizer for Green Bay should be their outside linebackers, particularly Clay Matthews. 

In the running game, the Steelers offensive linemen will rarely be blocking these types of athletes. That responsibility will fall to their tight ends, mainly Heath Miller.  He was probably the best blocking tight end this year,  he is capable of handling either Matthews or Erik Walden in the running game by himself.

The Steelers also use trips bunch formations in the ground game, which should help handle these edge players. The outside linebackers will be forced to align wider against these types of formations. If Miller can hold his own against the outside linebackers in standard formations and personnel  and the Steelers can handle the inside linebackers with just their offensive line in three wide receiver sets, I think the Steelers have a good chance of running the ball like they did against the Jets.

and in the 3-4 the d line not only has to keep the linebackers clean they have to destroy the run fits that are present and this was clear they did not do that good of a job as they ranked 18th in yards allowed and were in the bottom 5 of ypa...

and if lergurski does blow the center position is the easiest position to give help too

handling matthews in the passing game will be hard as the steelers will have no answer but ask suggs how that worked out...the past 2 games against the steelers he had 6 sacks and a forced fumble that was returned for a td and they lost both games]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jrmbadger</p>
<p>im not sure if you have watched any steeler games but the main point was that teams were able to dominate the line of scrimmage with their defensive line creating havoc in the backfield which did not even give the steelers a chance to worry about getting to the linebacker level&#8230;this game seems like they will be able to&#8230;</p>
<p>im not saying that Pittsburgh will dominate the line of scrimmage; the Packers front seven is still the better unit. What I&#8217;m saying is that if Pittsburgh had to choose a top five defensive front to play against, they may choose the Packers because of the style. The great equalizer for Green Bay should be their outside linebackers, particularly Clay Matthews. </p>
<p>In the running game, the Steelers offensive linemen will rarely be blocking these types of athletes. That responsibility will fall to their tight ends, mainly Heath Miller.  He was probably the best blocking tight end this year,  he is capable of handling either Matthews or Erik Walden in the running game by himself.</p>
<p>The Steelers also use trips bunch formations in the ground game, which should help handle these edge players. The outside linebackers will be forced to align wider against these types of formations. If Miller can hold his own against the outside linebackers in standard formations and personnel  and the Steelers can handle the inside linebackers with just their offensive line in three wide receiver sets, I think the Steelers have a good chance of running the ball like they did against the Jets.</p>
<p>and in the 3-4 the d line not only has to keep the linebackers clean they have to destroy the run fits that are present and this was clear they did not do that good of a job as they ranked 18th in yards allowed and were in the bottom 5 of ypa&#8230;</p>
<p>and if lergurski does blow the center position is the easiest position to give help too</p>
<p>handling matthews in the passing game will be hard as the steelers will have no answer but ask suggs how that worked out&#8230;the past 2 games against the steelers he had 6 sacks and a forced fumble that was returned for a td and they lost both games</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crusty14</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950914</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crusty14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@pigspigspigs

I&#039;m not doubting that the pack are a quality team and deserve to be in the SB, but, how did the pack make other teams o line look silly week in week out and only have a10-6 record? Some teams ( at least 6) must have had their way with your o line as well!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pigspigspigs</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not doubting that the pack are a quality team and deserve to be in the SB, but, how did the pack make other teams o line look silly week in week out and only have a10-6 record? Some teams ( at least 6) must have had their way with your o line as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FoozieGrooler</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FoozieGrooler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Green Bay fans can now breath a collective sigh of relief knowing their team won&#039;t have to face a Steelers rookie.
Unfortunately, our veterans players are still very much alive and well...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green Bay fans can now breath a collective sigh of relief knowing their team won&#8217;t have to face a Steelers rookie.<br />
Unfortunately, our veterans players are still very much alive and well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cityofchampyinz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityofchampyinz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jrmbadger

&quot;a record 14 (I believe) significant contributors on IR&quot;

Really, ALL 14 were significant contributors?? I&#039;m sure you would be happy to list them out for everyone here??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jrmbadger</p>
<p>&#8220;a record 14 (I believe) significant contributors on IR&#8221;</p>
<p>Really, ALL 14 were significant contributors?? I&#8217;m sure you would be happy to list them out for everyone here??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie54</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jamie54]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big deal, they won AFC championship game without him and if he had played he would not have been better than 60% or so anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big deal, they won AFC championship game without him and if he had played he would not have been better than 60% or so anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crusty14</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crusty14]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is a shame that pouncey is out, but I&#039;m sure Legursky will do ok.I&#039;m sure the steelers assumed pouncey would be out and therefore have 2 weeks to prepare with the new center.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame that pouncey is out, but I&#8217;m sure Legursky will do ok.I&#8217;m sure the steelers assumed pouncey would be out and therefore have 2 weeks to prepare with the new center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iced107</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iced107]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Tomlin really think he was fooling anyone by delaying to rule him out?

I mean yea I could see him trying to tough it out with just a high ankle sprain,but not with a broken bone on top of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Tomlin really think he was fooling anyone by delaying to rule him out?</p>
<p>I mean yea I could see him trying to tough it out with just a high ankle sprain,but not with a broken bone on top of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;cityofchampyinz says: 
Feb 4, 2011 4:06 PM 
@jrmbadger 

The standard is the standard.

We don’t make excuses. This is an opportunity for a young man to fill in and do his job to the standard of the greatest organization in professional sports.

Unlike all the Packers fans who keep whining about their 4,000 players on I.R. Like they are the only team in the whole NFL who has injuries.&quot;

We don&#039;t whine about the injuries.... We brag about having such a deep team that we make the superbowl with a record 14 (I believe) significant contributors on IR.  We brag about our coaching staff who has held things together, and we brag about our front office who has built such a deep team.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;cityofchampyinz says:<br />
Feb 4, 2011 4:06 PM<br />
@jrmbadger </p>
<p>The standard is the standard.</p>
<p>We don’t make excuses. This is an opportunity for a young man to fill in and do his job to the standard of the greatest organization in professional sports.</p>
<p>Unlike all the Packers fans who keep whining about their 4,000 players on I.R. Like they are the only team in the whole NFL who has injuries.&#8221;</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t whine about the injuries&#8230;. We brag about having such a deep team that we make the superbowl with a record 14 (I believe) significant contributors on IR.  We brag about our coaching staff who has held things together, and we brag about our front office who has built such a deep team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleisreallypinkyouknow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleisreallypinkyouknow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[63sixtythree says: 
Feb 4, 2011 3:32 PM 
Lugursky will do fine …
___________________________________

That&#039;s what all of the other top notch O-lines said the last 4 weeks. First NFL start and it&#039;s in the Super Bowl?? He&#039;ll be puking on his shoes by the 3rd series and the D-line will have him screwing up left and right....guaranteed. Watch when Ben starts kicking the ball around while it&#039;s on the turf.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

pigspigspigspigs says: 
Feb 4, 2011 3:58 PM 

Doug Legursky, might actually be better equipped to handle this kind of pass rush, Legursky’s short and stocky build should be ideal for handling bull rushes and clubs — his low center of gravity should keep him fairly stable.
___________________________________

See above. Every week, the Packers have taken top notch O-lines and made them look silly. They go and go and go and eventually the tank runs out of gas from the tenacity of GB&#039;s speed and strength. Ben is tough to bring down but is also the slowest QB in the league...probably by FAR. He&#039;ll get caught alot. Pitt&#039;s DB&#039;s won&#039;t be able to keep up with the Pack&#039;s spread and Troy P. can&#039;t cover all 4 or 5 guys. Good luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>63sixtythree says:<br />
Feb 4, 2011 3:32 PM<br />
Lugursky will do fine …<br />
___________________________________</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what all of the other top notch O-lines said the last 4 weeks. First NFL start and it&#8217;s in the Super Bowl?? He&#8217;ll be puking on his shoes by the 3rd series and the D-line will have him screwing up left and right&#8230;.guaranteed. Watch when Ben starts kicking the ball around while it&#8217;s on the turf.</p>
<p>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>pigspigspigspigs says:<br />
Feb 4, 2011 3:58 PM </p>
<p>Doug Legursky, might actually be better equipped to handle this kind of pass rush, Legursky’s short and stocky build should be ideal for handling bull rushes and clubs — his low center of gravity should keep him fairly stable.<br />
___________________________________</p>
<p>See above. Every week, the Packers have taken top notch O-lines and made them look silly. They go and go and go and eventually the tank runs out of gas from the tenacity of GB&#8217;s speed and strength. Ben is tough to bring down but is also the slowest QB in the league&#8230;probably by FAR. He&#8217;ll get caught alot. Pitt&#8217;s DB&#8217;s won&#8217;t be able to keep up with the Pack&#8217;s spread and Troy P. can&#8217;t cover all 4 or 5 guys. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh and another thing pigspigspigspigs:

Cullen Jenkins likely won&#039;t play much on running downs - they will use Howard Green (who is enormous) instead.

Again, the whole point of the 3-4 is to have your D-Line stalemate the other team&#039;s o-line and let the linebackers make the plays (&quot;in-space&quot;).  

So the pittsburgh O-line will have to try and move 1300 lbs of Packer man-meat to try and run the ball effectively.  A tall task.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and another thing pigspigspigspigs:</p>
<p>Cullen Jenkins likely won&#8217;t play much on running downs &#8211; they will use Howard Green (who is enormous) instead.</p>
<p>Again, the whole point of the 3-4 is to have your D-Line stalemate the other team&#8217;s o-line and let the linebackers make the plays (&#8220;in-space&#8221;).  </p>
<p>So the pittsburgh O-line will have to try and move 1300 lbs of Packer man-meat to try and run the ball effectively.  A tall task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holeinone09</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[holeinone09]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sure a number of Packer fans are happy about this.  Some of us Steeler fans prefer the opponents&#039; stars to play so we beat the best.  Nonetheless, the standard is the standard.  No excuses.  Not the first time or last time the Steelers had to deal with a key injury.  If Doug screws up, it will be unfortunate but life will go on.  I expect he will take this as his opportunity to prove what he is capable of.  The pressure frankly is more on Raji, since if Doug handles him in a reasonable manner, then Raji will come across as a bum.  In some respects, Doug doesn&#039;t have much to lose and should just play his tail off.

Steelers 24
Packers 20

GO STEELERS!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure a number of Packer fans are happy about this.  Some of us Steeler fans prefer the opponents&#8217; stars to play so we beat the best.  Nonetheless, the standard is the standard.  No excuses.  Not the first time or last time the Steelers had to deal with a key injury.  If Doug screws up, it will be unfortunate but life will go on.  I expect he will take this as his opportunity to prove what he is capable of.  The pressure frankly is more on Raji, since if Doug handles him in a reasonable manner, then Raji will come across as a bum.  In some respects, Doug doesn&#8217;t have much to lose and should just play his tail off.</p>
<p>Steelers 24<br />
Packers 20</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrmbadger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jrmbadger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;skoobyfl
what about rodgers 55 qb rating in the nfc championship???

The steelers o line is a weakness but if you take a closer look at the matchup this is the type of matchup the steelers o line would want. 

green bay has a big and physical defensive line (all three starters are over three bills). They like to get into offensive linemen, knock them back, and shed them to make plays in the backfield. If there is one thing that Pittsburgh’s offensive line has, it is size It will be tough to knock back guys as big as Flozell Adams, Ramon Foster, and Chris Kemoeatu. The best matchup the Packers have up front is Cullen Jenkins against Jonathan Scott, which is a decent-sized mismatch. However, the Steelers prefer to run to the right, which should diminish the effectiveness of Green Bay’s best defensive lineman.

Of course, most people’s concern with the Pittsburgh offensive line stems from their inability to protect Ben Roethlisberger. However, I think that the Packers front three will struggle to get pressure on Roethlisberger. With the exception of Jenkins, none of the Packers defensive linemen are particularly quick. Most of them are bull rushers with club counters, meaning they like to fire into an offensive lineman and get him off balance before using their forearm to club the defender to one side or the other.

the Steelers struggle up front when they can’t get their hands on people and are forced to deal with space. The Green Bay defensive line tries to eliminate space to create push, which is what the slower, heavier Steelers offensive line would prefer. Maurkice Pouncey is the one Steelers player who has the most trouble with pure strength, and he will be out. Doug Legursky, might actually be better equipped to handle this kind of pass rush, Legursky’s short and stocky build should be ideal for handling bull rushes and clubs — his low center of gravity should keep him fairly stable.&quot;

Sorry but the 3-4 DL&#039;s job is to simply tie up blockers so that the LB&#039;s can make plays &quot;in-space&quot; - That&#039;s kinda the point of the 3-4 - make the lineman play &quot;in space&quot; against the O-Line.  According to you that makes it a terrible matchup for the Steelers.  

Your whole post ignores the 4 linebackers behind the big 3.  All GB&#039;s DLineman have to do is stalemate the O-line and not get pushed back and let the LBs make the plays.  If the D-line gets a push thats simply a bonus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;skoobyfl<br />
what about rodgers 55 qb rating in the nfc championship???</p>
<p>The steelers o line is a weakness but if you take a closer look at the matchup this is the type of matchup the steelers o line would want. </p>
<p>green bay has a big and physical defensive line (all three starters are over three bills). They like to get into offensive linemen, knock them back, and shed them to make plays in the backfield. If there is one thing that Pittsburgh’s offensive line has, it is size It will be tough to knock back guys as big as Flozell Adams, Ramon Foster, and Chris Kemoeatu. The best matchup the Packers have up front is Cullen Jenkins against Jonathan Scott, which is a decent-sized mismatch. However, the Steelers prefer to run to the right, which should diminish the effectiveness of Green Bay’s best defensive lineman.</p>
<p>Of course, most people’s concern with the Pittsburgh offensive line stems from their inability to protect Ben Roethlisberger. However, I think that the Packers front three will struggle to get pressure on Roethlisberger. With the exception of Jenkins, none of the Packers defensive linemen are particularly quick. Most of them are bull rushers with club counters, meaning they like to fire into an offensive lineman and get him off balance before using their forearm to club the defender to one side or the other.</p>
<p>the Steelers struggle up front when they can’t get their hands on people and are forced to deal with space. The Green Bay defensive line tries to eliminate space to create push, which is what the slower, heavier Steelers offensive line would prefer. Maurkice Pouncey is the one Steelers player who has the most trouble with pure strength, and he will be out. Doug Legursky, might actually be better equipped to handle this kind of pass rush, Legursky’s short and stocky build should be ideal for handling bull rushes and clubs — his low center of gravity should keep him fairly stable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry but the 3-4 DL&#8217;s job is to simply tie up blockers so that the LB&#8217;s can make plays &#8220;in-space&#8221; &#8211; That&#8217;s kinda the point of the 3-4 &#8211; make the lineman play &#8220;in space&#8221; against the O-Line.  According to you that makes it a terrible matchup for the Steelers.  </p>
<p>Your whole post ignores the 4 linebackers behind the big 3.  All GB&#8217;s DLineman have to do is stalemate the O-line and not get pushed back and let the LBs make the plays.  If the D-line gets a push thats simply a bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickster2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickster2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[definitemaybe55 says: 
Feb 4, 2011 3:56 PM 
Can the Steelers put him and Aaron on IR at this late stage and bring a couple of other guys up?

=========================

that&#039;s why there is a 53 man roster.

They usually only dress 7 linemen anyway.  They will probably dress Tony Hills as backup tackle and Essex will be a backup for the interior lineman.  If any starters get hurt, though, they will be struggling!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitemaybe55 says:<br />
Feb 4, 2011 3:56 PM<br />
Can the Steelers put him and Aaron on IR at this late stage and bring a couple of other guys up?</p>
<p>=========================</p>
<p>that&#8217;s why there is a 53 man roster.</p>
<p>They usually only dress 7 linemen anyway.  They will probably dress Tony Hills as backup tackle and Essex will be a backup for the interior lineman.  If any starters get hurt, though, they will be struggling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryandaly16</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ryandaly16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I question his toughness, its the biggest game of his career, most guys would just cut that leg off to get into the game.  Come on MJD your with me right?  Deion?  Bruce Gradkowski?  Oh we all learned our lesson with Jay huh?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I question his toughness, its the biggest game of his career, most guys would just cut that leg off to get into the game.  Come on MJD your with me right?  Deion?  Bruce Gradkowski?  Oh we all learned our lesson with Jay huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stairwayto7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stairwayto7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever Rodgers throws his 2nd pick, no one will talk about Lugursk.  The only thing you will hear will be Packer fan chanting, &quot;WE WANT FAVRE, WE WANT FAVRE!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever Rodgers throws his 2nd pick, no one will talk about Lugursk.  The only thing you will hear will be Packer fan chanting, &#8220;WE WANT FAVRE, WE WANT FAVRE!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expatpatfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[expatpatfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pigs, you can&#039;t be that excited about the Flozell v. Matthews matchup.  Add in the now confirmed/long suspected Raji v. Legursky, and there&#039;s a clear advantage to GB in the trenches.  Conversely, GB fans can&#039;t be too excited about having a rookie go up against Woodley.  Both QBs will be running a lot, and both QBs *can* run, which should make for an interesting game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pigs, you can&#8217;t be that excited about the Flozell v. Matthews matchup.  Add in the now confirmed/long suspected Raji v. Legursky, and there&#8217;s a clear advantage to GB in the trenches.  Conversely, GB fans can&#8217;t be too excited about having a rookie go up against Woodley.  Both QBs will be running a lot, and both QBs *can* run, which should make for an interesting game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dixon29</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dixon29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High ankle sprains take 4-6 weeks to heal.  I understand why Pouncey wanted to give it everything he had to get on the field for the Super Bowl, but it was always just a pipe dream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High ankle sprains take 4-6 weeks to heal.  I understand why Pouncey wanted to give it everything he had to get on the field for the Super Bowl, but it was always just a pipe dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cityofchampyinz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cityofchampyinz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@jrmbadger 

The standard is the standard.

We don&#039;t make excuses. This is an opportunity for a young man to fill in and do his job to the standard of the greatest organization in professional sports.

Unlike all the Packers fans who keep whining about their 4,000 players on I.R. Like they are the only team in the whole NFL who has injuries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jrmbadger </p>
<p>The standard is the standard.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t make excuses. This is an opportunity for a young man to fill in and do his job to the standard of the greatest organization in professional sports.</p>
<p>Unlike all the Packers fans who keep whining about their 4,000 players on I.R. Like they are the only team in the whole NFL who has injuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tomlin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Tomlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly did Raji do before he pick 6&#039;ed a third string QB from the 4 yard line?

Nothing more than Big Snack does, thats for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly did Raji do before he pick 6&#8242;ed a third string QB from the 4 yard line?</p>
<p>Nothing more than Big Snack does, thats for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: claymaker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[claymaker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s disheartening to know that Maurkice isn&#039;t going to play on Sunday.   Which center was responsible for the fumbled snaps one of which resulted in the safety???  2 weeks of practice makes a difference, but also for both teams.  So while the Jets had no film study on the guy before he came in, it will be a different story for Raji now knowing the centers tendencies.   Jet&#039;s DT only had 2 sacks all year, and Raji had 7 not including playoffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s disheartening to know that Maurkice isn&#8217;t going to play on Sunday.   Which center was responsible for the fumbled snaps one of which resulted in the safety???  2 weeks of practice makes a difference, but also for both teams.  So while the Jets had no film study on the guy before he came in, it will be a different story for Raji now knowing the centers tendencies.   Jet&#8217;s DT only had 2 sacks all year, and Raji had 7 not including playoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerswinagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerswinagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legursky will be fine. He is one of the strongest guys on the team and maybe even matchups better against a NT like Raji than Pouncey does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legursky will be fine. He is one of the strongest guys on the team and maybe even matchups better against a NT like Raji than Pouncey does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steelerswinagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steelerswinagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodgers – Best playoff QB rating ever at ~ 130.
Big Ben’s Conference finals game QB rating – 35.


Rodgers did not even WIN a playoff game until this year.
Ben - 2 rings, 4 championship games, 10 playoff wins....that 35 rating is not how you measure what he did in that game. Rodgers was SHUT DOWN halfway through the 2nd quarter of his (only) championship game and the Bears defense is nowhere near as good as the Steelers. Do not expext Raji to get a pick 6 and bail you out this week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodgers – Best playoff QB rating ever at ~ 130.<br />
Big Ben’s Conference finals game QB rating – 35.</p>
<p>Rodgers did not even WIN a playoff game until this year.<br />
Ben &#8211; 2 rings, 4 championship games, 10 playoff wins&#8230;.that 35 rating is not how you measure what he did in that game. Rodgers was SHUT DOWN halfway through the 2nd quarter of his (only) championship game and the Bears defense is nowhere near as good as the Steelers. Do not expext Raji to get a pick 6 and bail you out this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovemesomenfl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lovemesomenfl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me preface this by saying I am not sure there is anyone who hates the Steelers more than I do - in every aspect of this great game.  With that said, does anyone think this will really change the outcome of the game?  The Steelers have been playing with one of the most patch work offensive lines in whole league for the second half of the season - and look at what they have done.  Truth is, they do enough to win almost every game they play, and those they did lose they very well could have won - minus one play or two.  This team has some of the best coaching in the league and (as players say about Belicheck) they know how to put their players in a position to excel.

The biggest problem you have with a center going down is the timing with the QB (and this did come out with the safety in the Jets game) but with two weeks to practice - this will become more and more of a moot issue.

Believe me, I am cheering harder than most people for the Packers this Sunday (with the exception of the umpteen millions of die hard Packer fans) but really ... the center not playing having a MAJOR impact on the outcome of the game - not a chance.  He will be able to read the coverages and call the blocking schemes just as well and the impact will be minimal at best.

Go Pack!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me preface this by saying I am not sure there is anyone who hates the Steelers more than I do &#8211; in every aspect of this great game.  With that said, does anyone think this will really change the outcome of the game?  The Steelers have been playing with one of the most patch work offensive lines in whole league for the second half of the season &#8211; and look at what they have done.  Truth is, they do enough to win almost every game they play, and those they did lose they very well could have won &#8211; minus one play or two.  This team has some of the best coaching in the league and (as players say about Belicheck) they know how to put their players in a position to excel.</p>
<p>The biggest problem you have with a center going down is the timing with the QB (and this did come out with the safety in the Jets game) but with two weeks to practice &#8211; this will become more and more of a moot issue.</p>
<p>Believe me, I am cheering harder than most people for the Packers this Sunday (with the exception of the umpteen millions of die hard Packer fans) but really &#8230; the center not playing having a MAJOR impact on the outcome of the game &#8211; not a chance.  He will be able to read the coverages and call the blocking schemes just as well and the impact will be minimal at best.</p>
<p>Go Pack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rugdog100</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/04/tomlin-confirms-that-maurkice-pouncey-is-out/#comment-950775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rugdog100]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=109344#comment-950775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Packers poor run defense will be dominated by Steelers O-Line... run, run, run.  The Steelers will pound the Pack into road kill.  
Steelers 28  Packers 17]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packers poor run defense will be dominated by Steelers O-Line&#8230; run, run, run.  The Steelers will pound the Pack into road kill.<br />
Steelers 28  Packers 17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
