Oh, wait. The NFL already gets 18% of my salary.

You would think by now that the leader of this site would learn to keep his opinions to himself before blurting out an entire blog post full of nonsense.

“League should be blamed for breakdown in labor talks” needs to be clarified, the author needs to apologize for his bias and restore any credibility he had left.
________________________
Well, seeing as how the league tossed out their first offer and refused to let the NFLPA continue to talk after they responded with their initial offer and then stormed out of the talks and canceled the next scheduled meeting, I think one can objectively state that the league representatives were the ones that killed the negotiations this time around. As for the league’s statement, there’s nothing to it. They don’t offer any real info and simply state that their actions were mischaracterized. If you hadn’t noticed, pretty much any time someone releases a statement that something they did or said has been mischaracterized or taken out of context, it tends to mean that they got caught doing or saying something that can get them in trouble or upset people they don’t want mad at them. If things hadn’t gone the way it was reported earlier, they would have come out and said that the earlier report was a lie or that it was factually incorrect. Instead, they simply say that their actions were characterized inaccurately.

Sincerely,
Bud Selig

This is still the best site for Football related stuff. But you are right. They are indeed biased towards the union which I cannot even begin to understand.

Well, he said “sorry”…now he’ll go back to bashing the NFL and Jerry Jones despite the fact that he has no clue who is actually to blame for the seating issue.

As I’ve posted SO man times before, Mikey and company are too busy injecting their opinion and bias into everything to EVER be considered a legit news source.

Whenever you see these kinds of stories, and you especially see this in politics, it’s usually the ones who come out first pointing fingers who are the liars. And it’s the follow up, the second response to the first allegation, that is probably closer to the actual truth.

I think this is probably nothing more than the union engaging in more nonsense trying to paint the picture one way, and bait the NFL into playing games.

He needs to quit being the contrition of this site and actually get some sense. There is no problem arguing a point…just do it intelligently.

“It tried to take the high road. Essentially the purpose for the statement was to say the NFL won’t negotiate in public.’

Really? the high road? Or they are losing a P.R. battle between this, the Super Bowl, and knowing that are demanding unreasonable requests of the players union?

“League should be blamed for breakdown in labor talks” needs to be clarified, the author needs to apologize for his bias and restore any credibility he had left.