Comments on: Richard Seymour expected to stay in Oakland http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Sat, 25 May 2013 00:57:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: raiderapologist http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-960917 Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:47:55 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-960917 marcsasharc says: Feb 10, 2011 9:46 PM

more fuel to the fire. raider fans better hope they win more than 9 games next year or the pompous idiots will look retarded!

Just in case, are there any seats on your bus?

]]> By: dasmol http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-960461 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:56:01 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-960461 Good for Seymour/Raiders, bad for the rest of the AFC West.

joetoronto:

The Raiders are on the way up, while you’re on the way down from nowhere.

Loser.

****************************************

Careful there Joe. Just because you took one foot out of the basement, doesn’t mean you’re ready to climb those stairs.

Hey, how are the argonauts gonna do this year?

]]> By: raiderinpa http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959981 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:42:53 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959981 Wow! People have nothing better to do than to rip on a team who is obviously on the rise via an article based on pure speculation…

Keep on hating, there will be plenty more hating to do once YOUR beloved team gets spanked AGAIN by the Silver & Black!!

]]> By: marcsasharc http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959913 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:04:05 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959913 “once a Raider, always a Raider”

-Charles Woodson
:)

]]> By: slickster35 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959902 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:45:55 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959902 Seymour will NEVER sign long term.

Thats proof enough that he’d rather be elsewhere.

]]> By: rtl1984 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959884 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:11:59 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959884 Great veteran to have on the team. Good for the raiders.

]]> By: marcsasharc http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959799 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:46:44 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959799 more fuel to the fire. raider fans better hope they win more than 9 games next year or the pompous idiots will look retarded!

]]> By: joetoronto http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959734 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:44:06 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959734 natelan says: Feb 10, 2011 6:46 PM

No amount is enough to stay on that awful team.

Condolences to Mr. Seymour.
********************************************************
“That awful team” has 3 more Super Bowls than the Dis-Chargers.

The Raiders are on the way up, while you’re on the way down from nowhere.

Loser.

]]> By: jc1958coo http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959732 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:42:42 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959732 i’m sorry richard, wasn’t your decision, if new england kept you, they would have played the packers!!!

]]> By: therolandobottom http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959731 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:41:44 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959731 So natelan who is this mysterious team of awesomeness that you represent? Probalbly the Lions.

]]> By: mrconnors http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959702 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:15:23 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959702 I love the taste of Raiders fans tears.

Patriots 16-13

]]> By: radrntn http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959700 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:13:56 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959700 @ natelan

here you go natelan..TOP TEAMS IN THE NFL..your team is dfl in the AFC WEST

http://cowboysblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/02/bob-sturms-nfl-rankings-final.html

]]> By: natelan http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959691 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:07:48 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959691 I wonder who they have in mind for head coach in 2013.

]]> By: snnyjcbs http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959690 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:05:15 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959690 I love how it just kills folks that the Pro Bowl DE/DT wants to stay in Oakland and will stay in Oakland.

I really enjoy how all the folks that laughed at Al Davis for taking Nnamdi late in round one of the Draft. Calling him a reach and a typical Al Davis pick, thrashing Nnamdi during his first two years calling him a bust. Are now slobbering all over themselves hoping they can get their hands on him. He will be staying in Oakland as well.

You media types rather then rehashing opinion you find in Local Teams Papers should start to try and call out a Seymour or Moss trade before the fact, now that would be an insider with a “source” lol. With “sources” like yours, Contra Costa Times, SF Chronicle you look foolish.

]]> By: essfjay http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959688 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:03:19 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959688 if anything we can say about Al is that he pays his players. plus Oakland is only getting better they had a break out offensive season and that D-Line was at the top of the league for sacks. sign a few more key FA maybe bring in a few pieces and the Raiders can easily contend to win the AFC West next year. let’s not forget that they swept the division too.

]]> By: raiderapologist http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959686 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:00:48 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959686 Davis keeps the guys he wants by slapping them across the face with his checkbook or slapping them with a tag. He deals with guys like Timmy Brown, Lechler, Asomugha, and Seymour by finding their price point.

]]> By: lunarpie http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959681 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:53:14 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959681 SOUTHTEXASRAIDER:
Yeh BABY!!! I love when everyone loves to talk bad against the Raiders after we went UNDEFEATED in our division. Next year AFC Title and AFC Championship game n maybe SB!
NERAIDER

]]> By: natelan http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959668 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:41:43 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959668 tatum064 says:Feb 10, 2011 7:15 PM natelan says: Feb 10, 2011 6:46 PM
No amount is enough to stay on that awful team.
Condolences to Mr. Seymour.

========================

Condolences to that 59-14 a%& kicking we dropped on Denver and a 6-0 AFC West sweep.
*******************

First of all, I’m not a Broncos fan…

Second of all, when going 8-8 and third in your division constitutes a good season, you know your team is epicly bad.

]]> By: 1mocollins http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959652 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:27:22 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959652 What a negative piece of c-ap you are. This Raiduh hating is getting so old. PFT was fairly unbiased until you come along. Go back to the rock you crawled out from under Greggy.

]]> By: pftareraiderhaters http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959639 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:18:07 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959639 when did SEYMOUR ever say he did not want to be a raider. I know BSPN said that, and PFT said that, but richard loves the silver and black…it has been in the 70′s and 80′s the past couple of weeks…plenty of sunshine in the bay, why it is freezing back east.

]]> By: tatum064 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959635 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:15:57 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959635 natelan says: Feb 10, 2011 6:46 PM

No amount is enough to stay on that awful team.

Condolences to Mr. Seymour.
========================
Condolences to that 59-14 a%& kicking we dropped on Denver and a 6-0 AFC West sweep.

]]> By: radrntn http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959633 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:13:51 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959633 gotta love gregg “i make stuff up about the raiders” rosenthall. If I recall the pats and belladick stabbed seymour in the back a week before the season began. All the haters sayed seymour would not show up at all, etc…I do believe he was in town for the monday night game against the chargers where he dominated the game. Unfortunaetely Louis Murphy had a touchdown called on the field , but went to booth review (same thing as a fumble, turned into tuck) which was called incomplete, and the raiders got beat by the refs yet once again…….so don’t think for a minute that seymour takes a lot more pride playing for the raiders, then he did the new england backstabbers.

]]> By: southtexasraider http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959632 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:13:08 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959632 lmao, yes the awful team and d-line he mentored to become the team with the most sacks this season.
like or not the silver an black are back and its gonna get ugly.

RAIDER NATION BABY!

]]> By: whynotusecommonsense http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959624 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:03:51 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959624 Love the “begrudgingly” editorial.

Since when does begrudgingly mean, “I needed time to get my family affairs in order”? Yep, that’s a quote from Seymour himself.

]]> By: tgraiders http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959621 Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:01:05 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959621 Yet another dead on PFT report that is if by;

“Richard Seymour came to the Raiders begrudgingly when he was acquired from the Patriots” – You mean we at PFT tried to make it seem that way regardless of what Seymour said at the time.

and by;

“Raiders value Seymour enough to repeatedly give him a 20% raise” – You mean this is the first time they would be giving him a 20% increase.

I see a long term deal worked out soon if we know anything about AL we know he pays the players he wants around same goes for Miller

]]> By: xtb3 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959607 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:48:35 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959607 When will you stop talking and reporting about this absolute crap of “he signing here” or “he signing there” when it all means absolutely nothing as there will be a lockout preventing any logical discussion about why any team needs or has cap room to sign anyone and they bwon’t be signing any including their own until a deal is finalized?

]]> By: natelan http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/richard-seymour-looks-likely-to-stay-in-oakland/#comment-959604 Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:46:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=110697#comment-959604 No amount is enough to stay on that awful team.

Condolences to Mr. Seymour.

]]>