<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Ingram runs official 4.62 forty at Combine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregjennings85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-977376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gregjennings85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-977376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, all this talk about Emmitt Smith is ridiculous. This kid has been solid in a run-first offense with a loaded supporting cast.

To make the leap in logic that he will be like Emmit Smith because they have similar measurables is laughable.

Smith&#039;s greatest attribute was his vision...that...and the 1,500 pounds of offensive line in front of him.

So, with that, I&#039;ll state: Unless he ends up in Carolina, Cleveland or Kansas City, he&#039;s going to disappoint.

_______________________________

sufferingbirdsfan:

As a nervous observer of the Eagles&#039; recent solid drafts, there is no way Reid uses a 1st round pick on a situational RB.

I&#039;m 99% sure Philly will be going O-line first, and then defensive front seven after that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, all this talk about Emmitt Smith is ridiculous. This kid has been solid in a run-first offense with a loaded supporting cast.</p>
<p>To make the leap in logic that he will be like Emmit Smith because they have similar measurables is laughable.</p>
<p>Smith&#8217;s greatest attribute was his vision&#8230;that&#8230;and the 1,500 pounds of offensive line in front of him.</p>
<p>So, with that, I&#8217;ll state: Unless he ends up in Carolina, Cleveland or Kansas City, he&#8217;s going to disappoint.</p>
<p>_______________________________</p>
<p>sufferingbirdsfan:</p>
<p>As a nervous observer of the Eagles&#8217; recent solid drafts, there is no way Reid uses a 1st round pick on a situational RB.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 99% sure Philly will be going O-line first, and then defensive front seven after that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregjennings85</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-977370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gregjennings85]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-977370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pass.

This kid keeps getting compared to Shonne Greene. Problem is, Greene can move a pile, while carrying 3 tacklers.

Ingram had running lanes the size of elephants, and he still wasn&#039;t exceptional.

I think his hype puts him in the top-15, but his talent is more in the 3rd round range.

I would rather gamble on a back in the later rounds than lock up a Maurice Clarrett-type gamble.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pass.</p>
<p>This kid keeps getting compared to Shonne Greene. Problem is, Greene can move a pile, while carrying 3 tacklers.</p>
<p>Ingram had running lanes the size of elephants, and he still wasn&#8217;t exceptional.</p>
<p>I think his hype puts him in the top-15, but his talent is more in the 3rd round range.</p>
<p>I would rather gamble on a back in the later rounds than lock up a Maurice Clarrett-type gamble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sufferingbirdsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-977022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sufferingbirdsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-977022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go ahead and pass on him, we&#039;ll take him in Philly as a double threat with Shady McCoy if no one else wants him. Emmitt Smith was no speed demon either remember.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go ahead and pass on him, we&#8217;ll take him in Philly as a double threat with Shady McCoy if no one else wants him. Emmitt Smith was no speed demon either remember.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thompgk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thompgk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 01:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats a terrible time. Anything under 4.6 is a success? 

Sounds like he is a Marion Barber III at best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a terrible time. Anything under 4.6 is a success? </p>
<p>Sounds like he is a Marion Barber III at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deanvernonwormer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deanvernonwormer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go. Mention the name &quot;Dolphins&quot; and we&#039;re in for another Dolphin con. First it was Ricky Williams. Then it was Ronnie Brown. Now it&#039;s Mark Ingram. And the only playoff appearance the Dolphins got out of it was when they brought in Pennington.

Don&#039;t worry. Saban is badmouthing the Dolphins organization to Ingram as we speak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go. Mention the name &#8220;Dolphins&#8221; and we&#8217;re in for another Dolphin con. First it was Ricky Williams. Then it was Ronnie Brown. Now it&#8217;s Mark Ingram. And the only playoff appearance the Dolphins got out of it was when they brought in Pennington.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry. Saban is badmouthing the Dolphins organization to Ingram as we speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miamiron</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976912</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miamiron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somewhere Chris Johnson is laughing]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere Chris Johnson is laughing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pftareraiderhaters</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pftareraiderhaters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[way to slow for the nfl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>way to slow for the nfl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: contraryguy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[contraryguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tomorrow we get tom compare this number to the guys who are going to be chasing him. probably a lotta guys who can make that 4.62

fwiw, combine runs:
Larry Johnson, 4.62
Jerome Bettis: 4.48
Brandon Jacobs 4.56 (4.7 at pro day)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tomorrow we get tom compare this number to the guys who are going to be chasing him. probably a lotta guys who can make that 4.62</p>
<p>fwiw, combine runs:<br />
Larry Johnson, 4.62<br />
Jerome Bettis: 4.48<br />
Brandon Jacobs 4.56 (4.7 at pro day)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc1958cool</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc1958cool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[small and slow is not making it in the nfl! sorry not a first rounder]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>small and slow is not making it in the nfl! sorry not a first rounder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cappa662</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cappa662]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overrated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zackd2</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zackd2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Step 1: Runs an unofficial 4.58
Step 2: PFT writes &quot;but anything sub-4.6 would qualify as a successful time for him.&quot;
Step 3: Release official time of 4.62
Step 4: Laugh]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step 1: Runs an unofficial 4.58<br />
Step 2: PFT writes &#8220;but anything sub-4.6 would qualify as a successful time for him.&#8221;<br />
Step 3: Release official time of 4.62<br />
Step 4: Laugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rushbacker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rushbacker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ingram should be a solid back, but overall this year&#039;s group of running backs is pretty unimpressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingram should be a solid back, but overall this year&#8217;s group of running backs is pretty unimpressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswestphal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976744</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jameswestphal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His burst is ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His burst is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dansnyder</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dansnyder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once Ingram is about 20 yards into his 40 yard dash he cannot help but to highstep the rest of the way.

It&#039;s in this man&#039;s DNA to highstep. That alone is enough reason to draft him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once Ingram is about 20 yards into his 40 yard dash he cannot help but to highstep the rest of the way.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s in this man&#8217;s DNA to highstep. That alone is enough reason to draft him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1972wasalongtimeago</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1972wasalongtimeago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I&#039;ll order my 3XL Ingram #22 jersey in Orange.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll order my 3XL Ingram #22 jersey in Orange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameswestphal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/27/alabamas-mark-ingram-runs-in-the-4-5s-at-combine/#comment-976723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jameswestphal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=114099#comment-976723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4.5S?  Do we need to solve for S to get a free profootballtalk.com Math Team Sweatshirt?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4.5S?  Do we need to solve for S to get a free profootballtalk.com Math Team Sweatshirt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
