Skip to content

Ravens’ Brendon Ayanbadejo wades into Maryland gay marriage debate

Brendon Ayanbadejo, Antonio Brown

The Maryland House of Delegates will vote on Friday on a proposal to allow same-sex couples to marry, and Ravens linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo is taking the opportunity to speak out in favor of gay marriage.

“Gay and lesbian couples want to marry for similar reasons as we all do: love and commitment. It’s time to allow them the opportunity to build a family through marriage,” Ayanbadejo says in a video released by Equality Maryland. “It’s a matter of fairness. This is why I’m asking Marylanders to join me in supporting marriage equality for same-sex couples.”

Most NFL players steer clear of taking stands on hot-button issues, but Ayanbadejo isn’t like most players. He has written in the past of his support of same-sex marriage, and he has also gone to Washington to lobby for other causes he believes in, increasing physical education and improving nutrition at schools.

Here’s the video:

Permalink 124 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Baltimore Ravens, Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
124 Responses to “Ravens’ Brendon Ayanbadejo wades into Maryland gay marriage debate”
  1. chapnastier says: Mar 9, 2011 2:56 PM

    What’s that sound? Oh yeah! That’s the sound of website hits!

  2. nps6724 says: Mar 9, 2011 2:59 PM

    Cue approximately 100 posts calling him gay for doing so.

  3. johosophat says: Mar 9, 2011 3:04 PM

    Kudos Brandon, keep up the good fight for equal rights.

  4. shastacornell says: Mar 9, 2011 3:09 PM

    Need more athletes to speak out like this. Excellent job.

  5. The Baseball Gods says: Mar 9, 2011 3:09 PM

    Good for you Brendon! Equality for everyone!

  6. ihatemikebrown says: Mar 9, 2011 3:17 PM

    Good for him.

  7. thenewwisewoo says: Mar 9, 2011 3:18 PM

    Good for him… but the real questions are what did he have for breakfast? what’s he eating for dinner? Did I see him jogging in new sweatpants? What’s his middle name? Oh my gosh he was seen in public with who?

    ProFootballTMZ

  8. truwarier90 says: Mar 9, 2011 3:19 PM

    terrell owens supports him too.

  9. joetoronto says: Mar 9, 2011 3:20 PM

    He says “it’s not subjective”, how so, his view should be the view of everyone?

    That’s a pile of horse crap, it IS subjective, and rightfully so.

  10. wvuandsteelers says: Mar 9, 2011 3:27 PM

    nps6724: I’ll be #1 of 100 then.

    Sounds like somebody’s coming out of the closet.

  11. toe4 says: Mar 9, 2011 3:32 PM

    Thumbs up for Brendon Ayanbadejo.

  12. pickyourking says: Mar 9, 2011 3:33 PM

    If 2 dudes or 2 girls want to spend $$$ to be divorced within 5 years,
    why would any law stopping that be considered constitutional?

    But for real if men (Especially ones who spent most at least 1/3 of their lives sitting around nekkid men and tackling them wearing spandex) can’t accept the fact that some men are born wired to lust/love other men then they probably lust/love men and
    hate on gays that have the balls to come out the closet

  13. Rex Grossman says: Mar 9, 2011 3:33 PM

    i luv america home of the free and brave eff ya i got every right to carry a firearm at all times this is america ok. equal effing rights. i cant believe gays want to get married and unequal my right to get married to 3 or 4 women. dem gays getting married creates inequality for us normal gents to get married. they fault they aint normal! we shudnt get punished cuz they aint normal. just kiss a woman for golly sakes! it aint hard! say no to inequality! gays should not get more benefits! they gay! didnt make the rules, sorry! sarah palin for prez!

  14. nickvpackfan says: Mar 9, 2011 3:39 PM

    Choosing to be gay or lesbian is a choice to not be legally married…Marriage is between a man and a woman…At least he is taking a stand…Even if it is the wrong one.

  15. facebook.com/joesimmonscomic AKA Slow Joe (Bucs fan) says: Mar 9, 2011 3:46 PM

    Thumbs up.

  16. trailerdawg says: Mar 9, 2011 3:50 PM

    Good for them. I believe that gays should be allowed to be as miserable as the rest of us married straight men. Welcome to the world of being financially held hostage to your mate. They have it made and they just don’t know it. It’s not worth the tax write off or the insurance stay single.

  17. voxveritass says: Mar 9, 2011 3:54 PM

    They should have the right to be miserable too.

  18. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 3:57 PM

    Equal rights? Gays can marry the opposite sex just like Heterosexuals can. That is called equal rights. Heterosexuals cannot marry the same sex, Gays cannot marry the same sex. Again, this is called equal rights. What this battle is truly about is SPECIAL RIGHTS, not equal rights!

    Gays want a special right granted to them under the law that currently exists for no one else. This about what they WANT. What of polygamy? If it involves consenting adults then who cares, right? What about Bigamy? In fact, why is the Federal Government involved at all when it comes to marriage? Because heterosexual marriage, when engaged by to loving parties is the optimum environment in which nature or God intended for us to rear children. It stablizes a society. Gay marriage is a farce and just another one of many otherperverted sexual fetishes.

  19. hobartbaker says: Mar 9, 2011 4:01 PM

    With his purple shirt, Brandon proudly reps his favorite team and his favorite Teletubby.

  20. packattack1967 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:02 PM

    As long as its voted on, Im ok with it. Just dont want some activist judge dictating policy to people.

  21. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 4:09 PM

    Equal rights? Gays can marry the opposite sex just like Heterosexuals can. That is called equal rights. Heterosexuals cannot marry the same sex, Gays cannot marry the same sex. Again, this is called equal rights. What this battle is truly about is SPECIAL RIGHTS, not equal rights! Ayanbadejo is just another “useful idiot” for the far left.The majority of Americans have already said NO to gay marriage when they have been allowed to vote on it.

  22. ArtModellsPimp says: Mar 9, 2011 4:15 PM

    I disagree with the entire premise of gay marriage.

    If it’s about love and being together, so be it…but it is NOT an issue that needs to be before the public. These are very private issues.

    The ONLY reason for this to be a public issue is because it’s about political power and money. The gay/lesbian lobbyists see this as a political power-grab. The individuals want legal access to healthcare and death benefits.

    If someone makes a private choice to be in that kind of relationship, fine. Throwing it into the face of the public, is not fine.

    You don’t have to stay in the closet. Just stay out of my face with it.

  23. toe4 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:16 PM

    Nickvpackfan,

    That is right, when I got up the morning of my 12th birthday and chose to be straight I did so knowing that one day I could be married with three wonderful kids.

    When Kim B. gave me my first kiss at the age of 13 she was also making a choice to someday marry my best pal and later divorce him.

    My best pal made the choice to fall in love with woman of loose morals, and not a man, precisely so he could get married (and then divorced when she cheated on him with their pastor.)

    When my next door neighbor turned 12 and decided he was gay he made a choice to not get married (until last summer when he did get married…)

    And when he also kissed Kim B. when he was 13 (see Sean she was a tart even back then) and realized that it was my best friend Sean that he really wanted to kiss (probably would have worked out better for you, Sean) it was a choice to not get married that he was making.

    And when that same next door neighbor went to prom with another boy from the next school over he made a choice to get beat up later that night by guys who thought just like you, Nickvpackfan.

    One of the great things about the US, by god, of A is that you, Nickvpackfan, have the right to state your opinion. But the best part is that I have the right to mock you for doing so.

  24. mad55555 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:17 PM

    Wow, Looking at the thumbs up and down for the bigot, prejudice comments actually givs me hope that most people want fair rights for everyone. I am curious to know how many of the prejudice comments did not get through. This counrty is evoling into what it was meant to be 200+ years ago. Can’t wait for the day when the minority is the majority in this great country. Only then will there be fair rights for all.

  25. southridge23 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:22 PM

    I’m just gonna go ahead and say it…I saw the title, and was hoping that he’d say something stupid…kudos to Brendon, but kinda disappointed

  26. CKL says: Mar 9, 2011 4:23 PM

    Scott Fujita also spoke out on this issue last year I believe.

  27. thefiesty1 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:27 PM

    No, they only want it for the insurance benefits.

  28. zeussuperman says: Mar 9, 2011 4:31 PM

    I’m pleasantly surprised at the comments section of PFT. Most of you have intelligent, thought out and rational opinions.

    Only a few of you are falling back on the distorted interpretations of a fictional book about a zombie savior allegedly written by an invisible man!

    Score one for Civil Rights.

  29. cleonslamminsalmon says: Mar 9, 2011 4:31 PM

    Yeah…I knew the Ravens were getting soft…Didn’t think they were getting THIS soft…Go Pack Go!

  30. acmepacker says: Mar 9, 2011 4:32 PM

    Why does it really matter what someone else does?
    I don’t understand why we should even be having this discussion. So you don’t care for something, don’t do it and don’t decide for someone else what they should do. I can’t understand why any one feels they are qualified to make the decision for another how they should be. Tend to your ownself and leave others alone. Bigotry is alive and thriving.

  31. toe4 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:36 PM

    I kind of don’t understand why the government is in the marriage business anyway? Why did my wife and I have to fill out a marriage licence application? Apparently we could have been turned down. Sorry, no marriage for you get back in line!

  32. insertnamehere2 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:37 PM

    trailerdawg says:
    Mar 9, 2011 3:50 PM
    Good for them. I believe that gays should be allowed to be as miserable as the rest of us married straight men. Welcome to the world of being financially held hostage to your mate. They have it made and they just don’t know it. It’s not worth the tax write off or the insurance stay single.

    ——————————————————– Marriage is a license to steal…

  33. toe4 says: Mar 9, 2011 4:38 PM

    mad5555… I was going to give you a thumbs up or down… but the truth is I didn’t quite understand what you were saying.

  34. Deb says: Mar 9, 2011 4:48 PM

    As Ayanbadejo said, we’re free to practice our religious beliefs, but government has to treat everyone objectively. Some nations have had laws forbidding divorce or the use of birth control because it was against the teachings of a particular church. I don’t want government making decisions about my life based on someone else’s religion … so I don’t have the right to make decisions for other people based on mine.

    It’s unusual for a football player to spend his free time as a writer and activist–especially on controversial causes. Ayanbadejo sounds like an interesting man. He’d be a good future guest for PFT Live.

  35. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 4:50 PM

    Wow, Looking at the thumbs up and down for the bigot, prejudice comments actually givs me hope that most people want fair rights for everyone. I am curious to know how many of the prejudice comments did not get through. This counrty is evoling into what it was meant to be 200+ years ago. Can’t wait for the day when the minority is the majority in this great country. Only then will there be fair rights for all.
    ———————–
    Our founding fathers did not create this nation so that sodomites and entitlement vampires could redefine marriage with their perversions and rob the treasury to finance their laziness. What this country is evolving into is Rome in it’s final days. Whe the professional victims finally get their way, and you are right that they will eventually get what they want because most Americans are apathetic and utterly clueless about history and the red flags to destruction, this nation will collapse into a bankrupt & perverse banana republic. You will win until you realize that you have ultimately lost, and by then it will be too late. Enjoy!

  36. nickvpackfan says: Mar 9, 2011 4:54 PM

    Toe4, I’m guessing that you either A. Related to both Sean and Kim B. or B. High…Your story make no freaking sense. lol, it was entertaining though…

    Mad5, you know what this country was founded on 200+ years ago? God fearing men who knew right from wrong…Just because it is more “accepted” now, doesn’t make it right.

  37. smellmyface says: Mar 9, 2011 4:57 PM

    Marriage is between a man and woman period. If they want to have some sort of ceromony with two women with one dressed like a man…go right ahead. All of this PC stuff is getting out of hand.

  38. dkeyser says: Mar 9, 2011 4:59 PM

    marrage is between a man and woman…And the divorce rate between man and woman is 55% of all 1st marrages end in divorce, 65% of all 2nd marrages end in divorce and 85% of 3rd marrages end in divorce….So yes all us straits should keep the failed institute of marrage to ourselves

  39. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 5:04 PM

    zeussuperman foolishly stated the following…

    I’m pleasantly surprised at the comments section of PFT. Most of you have intelligent, thought out and rational opinions.

    Only a few of you are falling back on the distorted interpretations of a fictional book about a zombie savior allegedly written by an invisible man!

    Score one for Civil Rights.
    —————–

    If you knew anything about the civil rights movement you would know that most of it’s heros & victims were & are predominantly students of that “fictional book” you speak of, and are also follwers of that “zombie savior” you just mocked.

    In fact, the VAST MAJORITY of blacks and hispanics are Christian! They also happen to be a large segment of the population that totally opposses “gay marriage”! That’s right silly boy, atheism is a white man’s disease! LOL @ YOU!!!

  40. trickbunny says: Mar 9, 2011 5:16 PM

    Well, one thing is for sure- it’s pretty apparent from the thumbs up and down after the comments that a good 75% or so of the people on this board have no problem with gay people having the same rights straight people do. WTFAY to tell another human being what they can or can’t do if it doesn’t affect you? Btw, “offending your sensibilities” isn’t going to count as “affecting” you. Sorry.

    In other words, if you’re one of the immature, old fashioned, probably-in-the-closet-yourself types who are making a comment that bashes Ayanbadejo for doing this PSA or bashing on gay people themselves, you’re *CLEARLY* in the minority here and pretty much everywhere else. If you can only find 2 or 3 people in a room of 10 that think what you think, then the 3 or 4 of you are probably thinking wrong. Or at least are stuck in the past. Sad.

  41. gordyb7 says: Mar 9, 2011 5:17 PM

    Marriage is between two people of the same race and same religion and different genders, period.

    God does not want White people marrying Asians or Christians marrying Buddhists or women marrying other women.

    Interracial marriage, gay marriage, and inter-religious marriage are going to destroy the morals of this country and should be outlawed.

    Unless you believe in personal liberty and all of that.

  42. NFLJunkie says: Mar 9, 2011 5:28 PM

    When I heard a story about a woman who had not been allowed to visit her longtime partner in a hospital’s intensive care unit after an accident because she was not legally next of kin, and her partner died before she was able to convince the hospital staff otherwise, I no longer questioned if we need to formally legalize gay marriage. The issues go deeper, but that one example really hit home.

    Heterosexuals have so many rights that are extended automatically based on being legally married. Things we often just take for granted. Of course it’s an equal rights issue.

  43. mad55555 says: Mar 9, 2011 5:37 PM

    @nickVfudgepacker:
    The founding fathers were against governing by/with religion. One of the most common statements from the “Religious Right” is that they want this country to “return to the Christian principles on which it was founded”. However, a little research into American history will show that this statement is a lie. The men responsible for building the foundation of the United States had little use for Christianity, and many were strongly opposed to it. They were men of The Enlightenment, not men of Christianity. They were Deists who did not believe the bible was true. Please try to keep up with the world which is evolving around you.

  44. johntonioholmes says: Mar 9, 2011 5:43 PM

    Vomitingliberals suffers from paranoid delusions. He is nothing but some dude who beats it to Glenn Beck 24/7.

    Open a history book before you talk about Rome or the Founding Fathers. You can’t get any factual information from that psycho of a talk show host.

  45. kingjamsi says: Mar 9, 2011 5:53 PM

    So happy to see this, way to go Brendon.

  46. abninf says: Mar 9, 2011 6:11 PM

    “It’s time to allow them the opportunity to build a family through marriage”
    ————————————————

    You don’t “build a family” through marriage.

  47. brasho says: Mar 9, 2011 6:27 PM

    I don’t support gay marriage.,.. but not for religious reasons… but I still have to commend BA for standing up and speaking his mind on a controversial subject that breaks the status quo in professional sports. It’s nice that a pro athlete can be confident enough to speak up for other people even if it MIGHT affect him negatively.

  48. bucks12965 says: Mar 9, 2011 6:29 PM

    At least this guy has balls.

  49. trickbunny says: Mar 9, 2011 6:30 PM

    abninf says:
    Mar 9, 2011 6:11 PM
    “It’s time to allow them the opportunity to build a family through marriage”
    ————————————————

    You don’t “build a family” through marriage.
    ——————————————

    What should we call it if a gay couple get married and then adopt or get a surrogate mother or a sperm donor?

  50. jfluke65 says: Mar 9, 2011 6:35 PM

    -wvuandsteelers says:
    Mar 9, 2011 3:27 PM
    nps6724: I’ll be #1 of 100 then.

    Sounds like somebody’s coming out of the closet.-

    I’ll be number 2. That’s the first thing I thought when I read it.
    Count me against it. Thankfully, I can’t see it ever coming to a vote in Virginia.

  51. chrismatthewsucks says: Mar 9, 2011 6:38 PM

    Eww..

    Maybe Mike Singletary can drop his pants for him if he likes the man on man.

  52. jfluke65 says: Mar 9, 2011 6:40 PM

    -mad55555 says:
    Mar 9, 2011 5:37 PM
    @nickVfudgepacker:
    The founding fathers were against governing by/with religion. One of the most common statements from the “Religious Right” is that they want this country to “return to the Christian principles on which it was founded”. However, a little research into American history will show that this statement is a lie. The men responsible for building the foundation of the United States had little use for Christianity, and many were strongly opposed to it. They were men of The Enlightenment, not men of Christianity. They were Deists who did not believe the bible was true. Please try to keep up with the world which is evolving around you.-

    That may be true of the select few tasked with actually wrtiting the Constitution, but is hardly true of the Continental Congress as a whole. most the Congress then, as now, were Christians.
    Anyway, not sure how ‘enlightened’ even the writers were. They still allowed for Slavery, and kept the vote to male land owners, age 21 or better among other things.

  53. jluttrell32 says: Mar 9, 2011 6:41 PM

    @ abninf
    “You don’t build a family through marriage”

    Umm, isn’t marriage the first step in building a family since according to certain faiths, you shouldn’t engage in premarital sex? And you shouldn’t have children out of wedlock.

    As for same sex marriages, again certain faiths say marriage should be between a man and a woman. But for debate purposes, these are not the actual words of god bu the words of man interpreting religion throughout time. So as time changes, shouldn’t also the belief that marriage could be between two adults who pledge their love and commitment for one another?

  54. trollaikman8 says: Mar 9, 2011 6:46 PM

    Glad to see Brendon getting a favorable response to his stance and statements. Who cares (other than Sean Hannity) if two men/women get married?
    Only the Taliban and Right-wingers.

  55. alltimeballa says: Mar 9, 2011 6:47 PM

    One of the misnomers about America is that we are a Christian nation! We are a nation that has Christians in it….being a christian does not give anyone the right to FORCE a system of belief upon Non Christians. It is equally incorrect for Non Christians to force their belief system on Christians. In America, we have the right to agree to disagree with what our moral compass says is wrong for us.

    I disagree with same sex marriages!

  56. sirbenly says: Mar 9, 2011 7:01 PM

    Rex Grossman says: Mar 9, 2011 3:33 PM

    i luv america home of the free and brave eff ya i got every right to carry a firearm at all times this is america ok. equal effing rights. i cant believe gays want to get married and unequal my right to get married to 3 or 4 women. dem gays getting married creates inequality for us normal gents to get married. they fault they aint normal! we shudnt get punished cuz they aint normal. just kiss a woman for golly sakes! it aint hard! say no to inequality! gays should not get more benefits! they gay! didnt make the rules, sorry! sarah palin for prez!

    ———————————————————————

    I think you’ve proven the point perfectly. Well done

  57. sirbenly says: Mar 9, 2011 7:12 PM

    Our founding fathers did not create this nation so that sodomites and entitlement vampires could redefine marriage with their perversions and rob the treasury to finance their laziness. What this country is evolving into is Rome in it’s final days. Whe the professional victims finally get their way, and you are right that they will eventually get what they want because most Americans are apathetic and utterly clueless about history and the red flags to destruction, this nation will collapse into a bankrupt & perverse banana republic. You will win until you realize that you have ultimately lost, and by then it will be too late. Enjoy!

    ————————————————————————

    Wow, calm down dude. You are confusing so many different things. I’m pretty sure that the Roman empire dissolved more because its borders were too spread out and because of the corruption of the government, among others, and less because of legalizing gay marriage. First, calm down then read a history book.

  58. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 7:21 PM

    simple test here-

    How do you know if being gay is ok?

    Try this simple test out-

    Everyone in the world has to participate for the results to be correct though. thats the kicker.

    Anyway, here we go.

    Starting today, EVERYONE in the world becomes gay, i mean flaming. No interest in the opposite sex going forward.

    All guys on guys and all gals on gals.

    Now, ask yourself-how long would the world survive?

    Maybe 70 or 80 years? maybe.

    How long before the economy crashes?

    Think about it, no more children being born.

    How would that harm the economy. Think about all that children consume, with that gone, things go south a little, right?

    How about the effect on colleges? how about the money lost once there are no moe kids to play collegiate sports?

    If college goes away, what happens to pro football? baseball? hockey?

    What happens when everyone is too old to do manual labor? hmmmmm?

    The proof is in the pudding, as they say.

    Think about it rationally, not with emotion and the truth will hit you in the face.

    So, the next time a gay person defies you to give them one good reason that doesnt include religion on why it is wrong to be gay tell them, if we all did it the world would collpase with a quickness.

    Watch them get angry and start to studder. watch me laugh.

    The truth hurts huh?

  59. johntonioholmes says: Mar 9, 2011 7:24 PM

    Do you believe in liberty? Do you believe in equality before the law? Do you believe in the protection of discrete and insular minorities?

    Better yet, do you believe in the Constitution?

    If you’ve answered yes to any of those, you have outed yourself as a supporter of gay marriage. No where in the Constitution does it grant the federal government the right to restrict marriage privileges, which is precisely what DOMA does (and many hypocritical douches support the legislation, but disavow what is idiotically and ignorantly referred to as “big government”).

    Why does it matter who someone else marries? If you care that much about it, you should see a shrink because you have a major insecurity problem.

  60. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 7:32 PM

    cmon guys tell me im wrong and the world wouldnt collapse if everyone turned gay. please tell me. you’d be wrong, but you could tell me.

    You see, the world has thrived doing things the old fashioned way since the beginning of time, it would only take 80 years to undo it all if everyone were gay.

    does that hit home with ANY of you people who think its cool for guys to bang other guys?

    oh, and its a sin that will send you to hell, did i mention that? laugh it up, cool. Every second that ticks by puts you one second closer to finding out how wrong you are/were.

    good luck!!

  61. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 7:33 PM

    please debate me. i defy you…….all that mouth and when reality hits you the gays go silent. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

  62. cunningstunts96 says: Mar 9, 2011 7:39 PM

    To all of the brilliant bigots who are claiming that marriage is ONLY between a man and a woman: Look up the definition.

    We have something in this country called “Separation of Church and State.” The idea that marriage is ONLY between a man and a woman is derived from thousands of years of religious practice and belief, and just about every single argument I’ve ever heard against gay marriage was derived from the Bible.

    That doesn’t fly, according to our Constitution. If you don’t like gay marriage, your remedy is simple: Don’t marry someone of your own sex. Really, those who don’t want to allow gay marriage are just ignorant, hateful, closed-minded people- to put it softly. How is it hurting or affecting you in ANY way? If you have any B.S. answer to that- just stop lying to yourself and others now. You’re nothing but closed-minded bigots with an outdated mindset that needs to be adjusted to catch up with present times.

    From a Pittsburgh fan, props to Brendon. Especially for going public with his thoughts.

  63. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 7:46 PM

    johntonioholmes says:
    Mar 9, 2011 7:24 PM
    Do you believe in liberty? Do you believe in equality before the law? Do you believe in the protection of discrete and insular minorities?

    Better yet, do you believe in the Constitution?

    If you’ve answered yes to any of those, you have outed yourself as a supporter of gay marriage. No where in the Constitution does it grant the federal government the right to restrict marriage privileges, which is precisely what DOMA does (and many hypocritical douches support the legislation, but disavow what is idiotically and ignorantly referred to as “big government”).

    Why does it matter who someone else marries? If you care that much about it, you should see a shrink because you have a major insecurity problem.

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I dont care who they marry, I’m just saying if everyone did it the world would collapse….You mean to tell me that fact doesnt make you think even a little?
    Or would you tell me that it isnt a fact? really?

    Since when can guys get other guys prego. I must have missed that one.

    You sounded so smart just a minute ago when you were posting and now the truth makes you realize you know nothing. How naive.

  64. dkeyser says: Mar 9, 2011 7:58 PM

    what does gay marrage have anything to do with everyone turning gay????

  65. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 8:06 PM

    dkeyser says:
    Mar 9, 2011 7:58 PM
    what does gay marrage have anything to do with everyone turning gay????

    00 i

    Rate This

    so……you dont deny that if we all took up your sexual beliefs that the world would collapse?

    please clarify.

  66. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 8:11 PM

    i know a lot of you gays out there at one time or another have said, man, i wish everyone was gay, then life would be so much easier.

    the classic line applies here, be carefull what you wish for. you might get it.

    and then you’ve got 80 years. but only 10 good ones. the other 70 would be pure hell.

  67. elyasm says: Mar 9, 2011 8:27 PM

    alltimeballa says: Mar 9, 2011 6:47 PM

    One of the misnomers about America is that we are a Christian nation! We are a nation that has Christians in it….being a christian does not give anyone the right to FORCE a system of belief upon Non Christians. It is equally incorrect for Non Christians to force their belief system on Christians. In America, we have the right to agree to disagree with what our moral compass says is wrong for us.

    I disagree with same sex marriages!

    ————————————————–

    That is perfectly fine, don’t marry the same sex then. But also don’t presume to tell other people who they can and cannot marry because you are then forcing your beliefs onto them.

  68. elyasm says: Mar 9, 2011 8:36 PM

    leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 7:33 PM

    please debate me. i defy you…….all that mouth and when reality hits you the gays go silent. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

    ——————————————

    The Ancient Greeks held gay (apparently PFT bans the more PC ‘h’ word) orgies on a regular basis but somehow avoided turning their entire population gay. The Allies would have found it pretty hard to win WWII without Alan Turing (gay). When you stop basing your worldview on a book of fairy tales you might find that there are lot less people in the world you need to hate.

  69. elyasm says: Mar 9, 2011 8:39 PM

    @leaguemvp
    What makes you think that allowing gay people to be happy together will cause everyone to turn gay? I support gay rights even though I find the thought of the actual act between two men repulsive. It sounds like you have some repressed desires in that direction of your own that you really need to come to terms with…

  70. mad55555 says: Mar 9, 2011 9:06 PM

    leaguemvp says:
    WTF is wrong with your brain? Besides the fact that people could still artifically insemenat, adopt, if “everyone in the world was gay” Everyone in the world would never be gay just like everyone in the world will never be hetrosexual. For your sake I hope that you are 13 yrs old and have not interacted with the outside world yet. Brace yourself kid, NOT EVERYONE IN THE WORLD acts as stupid as you. (thank god) Please stop spamming the comment section with stupidity.

  71. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 9:09 PM

    elyasm says:
    Mar 9, 2011 8:39 PM
    @leaguemvp
    What makes you think that allowing gay people to be happy together will cause everyone to turn gay? I support gay rights even though I find the thought of the actual act between two men repulsive. It sounds like you have some repressed desires in that direction of your own that you really need to come to terms with…

    @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

    So you do or dont deny that if everyone turned gay the world would collapse in short order?

    I’m not sure you addressed the facts in my post, please try again, but harder this time.

  72. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 9:12 PM

    and one more thing elyasm-

    for the record, i never said letting gay people live in sin would turn the rest of us funny, i just said lets try a simple experiment.

    I want to know what would happen if everyone were gay. EVERYONE.

    So, tell me, what is your estimate on how long the human race would survive if we were all like you….

    ps-
    sure you arent gay….

  73. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 9:19 PM

    The Ancient Greeks held gay (apparently PFT bans the more PC ‘h’ word) orgies on a regular basis but somehow avoided turning their entire population gay. The Allies would have found it pretty hard to win WWII without Alan Turing (gay). When you stop basing your worldview on a book of fairy tales you might find that there are lot less people in the world you need to hate.

    @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

    What does the bible have to do with the fact that if the entire world turned gay tomorrow the clock would be ticking on humanity?

    What does anything you just posted have to do with the reality i just slapped you with?

    sure, one gay couple wouldnt turn the world gay….no one ever said they would. Can you read sir?

    But doesnt the reality that a world could not survive if they all based their lifestyle on what you say should be allowed bother you a little bit? doesnt it make you think?

    The world has thrived for centuries doing it gods way, the world would last a matter of seconds in comparison doing it your way.

    really, that doesnt mean anything to you? and you say we are closed minded.

    isnt that the kettle calling the pot black….just wondering……

  74. leaguemvp says: Mar 9, 2011 9:26 PM

    dkeyser says:
    Mar 9, 2011 7:58 PM
    what does gay marrage have anything to do with everyone turning gay????

    41 i

    Rate This

    Are you able to read and understand?

    No one ever said it had anythingto do with anything.

    The point is earth wouldnt survive if everyone held the same moral shortcomings as you.

    Address the point please or go away. Tell me the world would figure out how to make guys able to get other guys prego or something….

    Anything other than pretending you are unable to understand what I posted because you cant mount a decent response rooted in reality.

  75. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 9:27 PM

    Well, one thing is for sure- it’s pretty apparent from the thumbs up and down after the comments that a good 75% or so of the people on this board have no problem with gay people having the same rights straight people do. WTFAY to tell another human being what they can or can’t do if it doesn’t affect you? Btw, “offending your sensibilities” isn’t going to count as “affecting” you. Sorry.

    In other words, if you’re one of the immature, old fashioned, probably-in-the-closet-yourself types who are making a comment that bashes Ayanbadejo for doing this PSA or bashing on gay people themselves, you’re *CLEARLY* in the minority here and pretty much everywhere else. If you can only find 2 or 3 people in a room of 10 that think what you think, then the 3 or 4 of you are probably thinking wrong. Or at least are stuck in the past. Sad.
    ——————–

    How old are you? 15, 16? The “Immature old fashioned” types are the only ones with common sense. Wh is supposedly smarter, the idiotic public school indoctrinated youth? LOL.

    The likely “closet types” to speak of are the alleged heterosexual types who fall over themselves to defend sodomy.

    People who think like me might not be a majority on a leftist stronghold website run by MSNBC, by several RECENT elections across this nation (California & Oregon included) have all said NO to gay marriage. YOU are in the minority and as the population of Christian Blacks & Hispanics continues to grow, you will see less and less support for gay marriage. Gay Marriage, like atheism, is a white man’s disease! So you are the one living in the past, the world is evolving and more minorities= less concern for deviant lifestyles!

  76. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 9:46 PM

    Wow, calm down dude. You are confusing so many different things. I’m pretty sure that the Roman empire dissolved more because its borders were too spread out and because of the corruption of the government, among others, and less because of legalizing gay marriage. First, calm down then read a history book.

    —————-

    Rome did not collapse because of gay marriage, but nor did it collapse because of “spread out borders” or “government corruption”. It’s borders were ALWAYS spread out (it was an empire after all, smarty-pants), and it’s government, like ALL governments, was corrupt from the beginning. So try again, and this time try reading a history book that wasn’t recommended to you by a commie revisionist.

  77. vomitingliberals says: Mar 9, 2011 10:00 PM

    Vomitingliberals suffers from paranoid delusions. He is nothing but some dude who beats it to Glenn Beck 24/7.

    Open a history book before you talk about Rome or the Founding Fathers. You can’t get any factual information from that psycho of a talk show host.
    ———————

    I have gleaned all of the knowledge I have about Rome and our Founding Fathers from history books. But the difference between the two of us is that I prefer not to read history books that have been written by communists, 1960’s revisionist perverts, or entitlement grabbing race pimps.

    The majority of our Founders believed in God, they took issue with the notion of theocracy, but they definitely had faith in God. Franklin & Jefferson struggled with their concept of God, but Madison, Washington, Adams and nearly the entire continental congress were devout men of faith. Furthermore, Jefferson spoke volumes of the value he found in the Christian faith and borrowed HEAVILY from the Puritans in gathering governmental concepts for the new founding documents. NONE of our founders would have supported gay marriage, and as the American population grows darker, and more and more blacks & hispanics begin to vote, you will see America becoming more and more Christian. Blacks 7 Hispanics will always vote solidly against sexually deviant agendas at the polls. They might like your liberal handouts, but they don’t want ANYTHING to do with your filthy white boy perversions. LOL & YOU!!!

  78. dkeyser says: Mar 9, 2011 10:04 PM

    This is me making my point..You went on this long drawn on rant about “if” this and “if” that…well IF a frog had wings he wouldnt bump his ass when he hopped…
    Gay marrage isnt going to lead to everyone turning gay. Its less than 5% of the population. Youre not even comparing apples to oranges, youre comparing apples to baseballs..get a clue man

  79. toe4 says: Mar 9, 2011 10:11 PM

    LeagueMVP is copping it dangerously close to falling into Internet Tough Guy domain.

    No answer me this. What would happen if everyone in the world would reply to your post and actually debate you all at once?

    C’mon!!!! Think about it!!! Debate me, I dare you!

    The internet would crash. All of it tumbling down. You would have maybe ten minutes of hot debate and them boom… no more porn, no more PFT, no more internet tough guy.

    Most everyone here is smart enough not to talk to a Troll. Apparently I am not. LeagueITG, you do know that your very odd argument really does a disservice to the people out there with legitimate anti-gay marriage points.

    Which, as far as I can tell the only legitimate anti-gay marriage posts I’ve seen on here are the people honest enough to simply say “I just don’t like it.”

    Which really is what it all boils down to, isn’t it?

  80. johntonioholmes says: Mar 9, 2011 10:31 PM

    leaguemvp

    Gay people have existed for thousands of years. They have been together for thousands of years.

    The world has never collapsed.

    Your fear seems to be predicated on the idea that gays being allowed to marry means that every straight person will start taking advantage of the system by also getting married to someone of the same sex.

    If that’s your concern, then I’ve got news for you–you might be gay.

  81. johntonioholmes says: Mar 9, 2011 10:37 PM

    @jfluke65

    Most of the continental congress were deists. A lot of them were Christians; a few were Catholic.

    And when he referred to them as enlightened thinkers, he was referring to the schooling of thought.

    Also, the 3/5 compromise was an effort to take voting power away from the southern states, who wanted the non-voting slaves to count as part of their population thus giving them disproportional representation. They knew slavery was going to be a problem in the future, which is pretty enlightened if I do say so.

  82. nps6724 says: Mar 10, 2011 12:51 AM

    If the entire world population suddenly turned into eggplants, how long would the human race survive?? 0 days, on account of them now being eggplants. Therefore, all eggplants should be illegal from this day forward. If you even look at an eggplant, you’re probably gay for eggplants.

  83. leaguemvp says: Mar 10, 2011 11:15 AM

    Who is talking about eggplants. But I knew you guys would try to change the subject. That’s what people do when they can’t formulate an actual response that has anything to do with the experiment I proposed.

    Name calling and avoiding. Congrats, you did exactly what I knew you would do.

    The experiment would prove that being gay is the opposite of natural.

    For you guys to turn a blind eye to that fact proves you are biased.

    That’s all I’m saying.

    Be gay, it’s cool. Just be glad that we all don’t live like you guys. The world would turn into a ghost town prett quickly.

    Quick question, how did aids spread so quickly in the early 80’s. Anyone gay guys have any ideas?

    Why do you guys think the majority of the world considers being gay immoral, a sin? Ever heard the saying “a thousand china men can’t be wrong”?

    I think that saying applies pretty well in thus case. Just saying.

  84. raven4life21 says: Mar 10, 2011 1:31 PM

    quoting one of my buddies… “they deserve to be just as miserable as the rest of us”

    good call

  85. raven4life21 says: Mar 10, 2011 2:16 PM

    wow, there are some REAAAALLLY disturbed people on here… if a single one of you could look away from your own biases and insecurities and THEN look at what you are posting… you would think the same… prob is… most of you “antigay” idiots are too stubborn and old fashioned to EVER put your own views and biases and insecurities aside to do this… so it’s pretty much pointless talking to a brick wall and waiting for it to agree with you… anybody that disagrees with gay marriage has NEVER been in love themselves or actual TRUE love… or it’s bogus love or you just don’t like the idea of gay marriage and can’t get over yourself..yeah im sure there are gonna be people who act like it just to get tax brakes and discounts but you cannot deny a person of how they feel naturally… you can say it’s wrong (and this is for you religion fanatics out there) and you say it’s wrong cuz God or the Bible says its wrong… but how could it be wrong when (im sure in most of your views) GOD created these gay people… so now you are calling God wrong??? pretty bold thing to do if you ask me

  86. ruvelligwebuike says: Mar 10, 2011 2:49 PM

    I have no real concern on this matter whatsoever, but tell me if I’m right.

    The 27 year old white, heterosexual male who eats meat, hunts, fishes, plays golf, works hard and goes to church….

    …is now the bad guy in the story of life?

  87. thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 4:24 PM

    GOD created these gay people… so now you are calling God wrong??? pretty bold thing to do if you ask me

    @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

    God doesnt create sinners, he creates man in his own likeness.

    Read the bible before you assume to know what it contains.

    The bold thing to do is to think its okay to make it law to allow guys to bang guys and call it marriage.

    When countries pass laws that fly in the face of the creator of this universe, bad things follow….

    Since you dont read the bible ill tell you a short story-

    City named sodom and gomorrah collapsed because of all the, you guessed it, deviant activity, ie, guys banging guys.

    God destroyed the city because they wouldnt change, kinda reminds me of whats happening in california these days…..trashed economy, earthquakes, nancy pelosi…woops, sorry, did i type that last part?

    Why do you think san fran gets the awesome rcognition as being the anus of america?

    Do you guys consider that name flattery? it isnt….just FYI.

    Another question you guys will avoid like you avoided confronting my proposed experiment on what would happen if everyone were gay? not even turned gay, what if everyone born from here on out was “born gay”?(which is impossible, but for conversations sake) how long would we all last? answer-

    NOT LONG BRO!!!

    Cue name calling and avoiding.

    Is it any wonder that the most hardened criminals practice sodomy in prisons across america? They are usually called sodomites, at least they were in the shawshanked redemtion. remember those guys raping andy dufresne….classy group of gents huh?

    When you vote for gay marriage you are siding with the sodomites. That’s a groups I’d want to stay as far away from in every respect from living near them to living like they live. Anything they do, I’m running from it 100 mph. Which is yet another way to put being gay into perspective.

  88. thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 4:32 PM

    hey toe4-

    Which, as far as I can tell the only legitimate anti-gay marriage posts I’ve seen on here are the people honest enough to simply say “I just don’t like it.”

    ___________________________________
    Does the fact that the creator of the universe, your creator, calls it a sin against him not count for anything?

    Does the fact that the world would collpase if everyone were “born gay” not mean anything to you? You cant see how that result means something has to be wrong with it? of course you dont nacy pelosi…..

    The truth is coming soon my friend. Think back on this day, when you heard the truth but rejected it.

  89. nps6724 says: Mar 10, 2011 4:41 PM

    I’m still waiting for you to answer MY question:

    What would happen if everyone was born an eggplant? The human race would be nonexistent. Thus eggplant = evil.

  90. thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 4:48 PM

    from league mvp, but you guys avoided it like he knew you would so i again pose these simple, yet for you, unanswerable and maddening questions-

    Quick question, how did aids spread so quickly in the early 80′s. Anyone gay guys have any ideas?

    Why do you guys think the majority of the world considers being gay immoral, a sin?

    Why is it specifically mentioned in the bible as a sin against god and man?

    Before you discount the bible, remember, this is the oldest, longest lasting, most read piece of literate EVER. IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE. please tell me.

    If being gay is natural, why cant men reproduce with other men? women with other women?

    enlighten me please, if you can.

  91. thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 5:28 PM

    nps6724 says:
    Mar 10, 2011 4:41 PM
    I’m still waiting for you to answer MY question:

    What would happen if everyone was born an eggplant? The human race would be nonexistent. Thus eggplant = evil.

    ___________________________________
    What would happen?

    The answer is you’d be better off (much better off when compared to being “born gay” which again is impossible) being an eggplant than being a gay person. At least you arent living in sin and going against the creator of the universe, which is kinda nice.

    now, its your turn…I await your non response.

  92. thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 5:29 PM

    nps6724–

    anyway pal, i asked first……

  93. samsam1450 says: Mar 10, 2011 6:05 PM

    Hey moron…. ok if everyone in the world turns gay how would we reproduce??

    Ever hear of artificial insemination? Now go crawl back under your bigoted rock.

  94. nps6724 says: Mar 10, 2011 6:31 PM

    There’s simply nothing to respond to. It’s a ridiculous question. Which is why I posed an equally ridiculous one.

  95. reddskeletor says: Mar 11, 2011 4:01 AM

    It is pretty gutsy of him to advocate for gay rights; the NFL is not some bastion of socially liberal thinking. There are lots of conservative Christians in the NFL. When Reggie White made his comments in 1998, he was criticized by many in the media, but the NFL players, especially the Christian ones, thought he was speaking the truth.

  96. juancorsair says: Mar 11, 2011 10:45 AM

    The Maryland House of Delegates will vote on Friday on a proposal to allow same-sex couples to marry, and Ravens linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo is taking the opportunity to speak out in favor of gay marriage.

    Nobody cares. Perhaps if this issue was even remotely related to football, somebody here would. What’s next? A post on how each player around the league plans to vote in 2012?

  97. spizzy123 says: Mar 11, 2011 11:22 AM

    I don’t support gay marriage but I think gay couples should have the right to the same health benefits/privileges that married couples do.

    that being said, some of the arguments above against gay marriage are plain ridiculous.

    I applaud this guy for taking a stand – I’m sure his stand will even generate controversy in his own locker room.

  98. 1historian says: Mar 11, 2011 1:01 PM

    In 31 states the voters have had the opportunity to vote on allowing same-sex marriage.

    In all 31 states the response was NO. The only states in which same-sex is legal are states in which either the legislature or activist judges have made it so.

    That having been said – it takes cojones for the guy to speak out as he did and I commend him for it.

    And I disagree with him.

  99. 1historian says: Mar 11, 2011 1:02 PM

    I should have said ‘same sex marriage’ instead of just ‘same sex’.

    My bad

  100. sf5x says: Mar 11, 2011 3:02 PM

    I must be too logical for this website, since msnbc won’t post my rational comment.

  101. mjdkid100 says: Mar 11, 2011 3:22 PM

    thirstythursday01 says: Mar 10, 2011 4:48 PM

    from league mvp, but you guys avoided it like he knew you would so i again pose these simple, yet for you, unanswerable and maddening questions-

    Quick question, how did aids spread so quickly in the early 80′s. Anyone gay guys have any ideas?

    Why do you guys think the majority of the world considers being gay immoral, a sin?

    Why is it specifically mentioned in the bible as a sin against god and man?

    Before you discount the bible, remember, this is the oldest, longest lasting, most read piece of literate EVER. IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE. please tell me.

    If being gay is natural, why cant men reproduce with other men? women with other women?

    enlighten me please, if you can.

    ___________________________________

    Exact reason your view is worthless, you latch on just because people have thought this for a long time, without actually doing anything thinking for yourself. The bible was written by humans who wanted to control people. Its been changed, translated, and exploited by stupid people for thousands of years.

    How old do you think the earth is?

    Do you believe in life on other planets? Over the billions and billions and billions of galaxies, each containing billions and billions and billions of stars, which could then contain planets. Why do you think ours is so special? Let me tell you something its not. We are a drop in the ocean to the rest of the universe. We are the equivalent of some ant colony in africa youll never notice.

    There may be a creator, none of us will ever know. But he certainly didnt want a bible and he certainly wouldnt hate science as you christian morons and retards do. As always though you will be left behind with evolution, its just taking too damn long.

    “Quick question, how did aids spread so quickly in the early 80′s. Anyone gay guys have any ideas?”

    this was a hilarious statement from you. Why is AIDs in Africa spreading? Ill give you a hint, its not because of gays, its because christian lunatics like you and the Pope denounced condoms, with the Pope actually saying on a trip to Africa once, “youre more likely to get AIDs with condoms.”(look it up)

    Religion holds our species back, and that is an absolute fact. Nothing good has come of it, in the thousands of years you nuts have believed it. Just wars, genocide, pedophilia(by not letting priests marry), and hate.

  102. johntonioholmes says: Mar 11, 2011 4:02 PM

    My god. Most of you social conservatives are frickin’ cultists.

    I at least respect the people who don’t support gay marriage simply because they don’t like it. It’s a totally weak argument, but at least they aren’t citing John Birch.

    At least they are talking about what the founders wanted, despite having never read the records of the Constitutional convention or the federalists papers…or even the Constitution.

    At least they aren’t saying gay marriage is a communist conspiracy.

    I knew a lot of social conservatives were certifiably insane; I just never though that it was most of them.

  103. alltimeballa says: Mar 11, 2011 8:34 PM

    @Elyasm

    So you are just letting me know that you agree with everything I said? Cool.

  104. waynefontes says: Mar 12, 2011 5:46 AM

    The idiocy of some of these comments would be laughable isn’t it wasn’t so sad.

  105. cunningstunts96 says: Mar 12, 2011 11:55 AM

    thirstythursday01 says:

    “Before you discount the bible, remember, this is the oldest, longest lasting, most read piece of literate EVER. IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNIVERSE. please tell me.”

    No, it isn’t.

    Beowulf is.

    For real, though, even if it was- it doesn’t matter. We’re not the United States of Christianity. We’re Americans. We have a Constitution and (supposedly) freedom. We’re not robots who follow what a few writers (mind you, King Henry VIII was one of the re-writers of the Bible- you wanna follow his example? I didn’t think so). The Bible isn’t a book of laws, and even if it was, it is a terribly supported one as it all falls back to a deity that, whether or not we believe in him, we have no proof that he exists.

    To put it bluntly for you: If you are quoting the Bible, you’re wrong, according to our Constitutional rights. Period. On top of that, you have NO grounds on which to base the laws by which the Bible says you have to live. Again, we have Separation of Church and State. The Bible cannot legally dictate what our laws permit. That, coupled with the fact that gay marriage hurts, displaces, violates, or-any-other-stupid-excuse-you-have NO ONE… We have no choice but to legalize it. Marriage isn’t a union between a man and a woman. It’s a union between two people.

    Look it up in a real dictionary. Not your book written by a man who killed numerous wives for not giving him a son.

  106. bradymancrush10 says: Mar 12, 2011 12:12 PM

    This argument has been dragged through the mud many times already…..
    The fact is the book of Romans in the New Testament is perfectly clear on this issue. All of the worlds major belief systems are strongly against the practice. This is just another example of man believing he knows more than God and refuses to obey and worship Him.

  107. cunningstunts96 says: Mar 12, 2011 12:44 PM

    ^Or a man willing to think for himself, and not giving in to a religion YOU believe simply because YOU say it’s right.

    You zealots are so ignorant.

  108. bradymancrush10 says: Mar 12, 2011 12:45 PM

    @ cunningstunts96 :
    our Bible we read today is primarily from William Tyndale who was one of the first to translate form the Greek and Hebrew texts to the King James Bible..
    Henry tried to muscle in on the church of England to change the marriage laws. A simple reading of a Bible will dispel all notions of what Henry did was reasonable.

  109. bradymancrush10 says: Mar 12, 2011 2:27 PM

    @ cunningstunts96 :
    Why all the name calling?? If we are just believing in “fables”, why are you so offended? Are you as offended if your child believes in Santa? After all, isn’t Santa just a fable? Does he really exist?
    The fact for you and everyone elses hostility is because you are quite aware of your maker and try to absolve Him from your conscience.
    If He was just a fable, it wouldn’t really matter would it?

  110. raven4life21 says: Mar 12, 2011 5:56 PM

    if gay marriage isn’t allowed then neither should marriage between man and woman… look at the statistics, men and women can’t even get marriage right… every day the divorce rate is climbing higher and higher, so what makes straight people so special just because they can reproduce children naturally??? that’s the only difference isn’t it??? take all the religious crap out of the argument and you have no basis at all against gay-marriage… take whatever you’ve been told to believe and throw it out the window and where does your opinion lie?? gay people have just enough right to be as miserable as the rest of us… and i am a heterosexual… and no the entire world is not going to one day turn entirely gay and won’t be able to reproduce, that’s a freagin fairytale if i ever heard one, get over yourselves people, the world is gonna end someday anyway, might as well let people be happy

  111. argel830 says: Mar 13, 2011 10:32 AM

    This Leaguemvp fella never heard of artificial insemination then? Doesn’t sound too bright really. If everyone was gay (including you boyo) then I imagine it would be strange, but it wouldn’t destroy the human race. Simple as that.

    The other one, vomitingliberals, well he sounds like exactly what he is, a lunatic. Also as a historian I find his desire simply not to read history books he doesn’t agree with particularly stupid. If you only read books that reinforce your own opinions on a subject, how do you intend to learn anything? How do you challenge your preconceived notions? I know the answer, it is that you don’t, you just consider yourself right and don’t have the mental capability to deal with conflicting opinions.

    Don’t worry though America, you’re doing better than we or anyone else gives you credit for. As a British person I was pleasantly surprised by the post ratings, seems to indicate that maybe those that shout the loudest don’t speak for you all.

  112. leaguemvp says: Mar 13, 2011 9:07 PM

    First off, there is no “right” for guys to marry guys. Its your right to live in filthy sin if you want, but it isnt your right to have the gov’t recognize you as normal. You arent normal. thats why they call you “funny”

    Just be glad you live in america pal, go to iran and you and your boyfriend will go missing in the middle of the night…is that ignorant of me to say? how do you feel about that “conflicting opinion” on how to treat deviants?

    Next,

    Your only comeback to me is “artificial insemination”? really?

    If being “funny” was natural and “right” procreation would happen naturally pal, like how grass grows or how pollination occurs, all natural, natural like a man and a women having a child.

    And doesnt the word “artificial” mean anything to you? kinda like “fake”?

    The reason my experiment proposal doesnt sound too bright to you is because the only answer to the question it poses is an answer you refuse to allow to part your lips.

    And anyway, art. insem. is cheating, the experiemt is to see if you deviants can be deviants and not need the opposite sex for anything, try to live like a man and a women would live, since being deviant is as normal as a man and a women in your mind, try it out smart guy. tell me where it gets you charlie. I already know, you do too, thats why you are still posting a week later, furious as ever.

    And since you’re a historian, im sure you have taken the time to read the oldest, most read book on the planet end to end…..im sure. dont know the name? I’m not shocked, “historian” hahaha.

    last thing, you arent pleasantly surprised because your british, its because you sympathize with deviants on the highway to hell. enjoy.

  113. leaguemvp says: Mar 13, 2011 9:12 PM

    for the record, i dont hate the person, i hate the sin.

  114. leaguemvp says: Mar 14, 2011 10:16 AM

    looks like the battle is now OVER for the year.

    The turning point was when the deviant rep made a joke about his creator.

    “God didnt sign up for or against”

    he didnt huh?

    Is that man literate? Has he EVER heard of the bible?

    Dont try to smack god in the face because you cant have your way.

    The black church shut em down baby.

    Game over baby. Touchdown for the good guys.

    See ya next year, if you have the energy, you see its a lot easier to type than it is to actually win, you guys showed up en masse to type, god showed up as one to win. and win he did.

    Do you guys like apples?

  115. leaguemvp says: Mar 14, 2011 10:19 AM

    how bout them apples?
    now crawl back to san fran and tell nancy we dont want her politics.

  116. chc36 says: Mar 14, 2011 1:55 PM

    You realize you just said that it was God’s hand in making the decision to shoot down the law right? By that logic you thereby claim that it was God’s hand that killed thousands of Japanese, that it is God’s hand that makes women kill there unborn babies, that it is God’s hand that allows the drunk driver run his car into family on the way back from church? And don’t say its the Devil who is also present in the world, because I can counter just as easily and tell you to prove that it wasn’t Satan’s hand in shooting down the law, because you can’t. Nobody can, I’m not saying your wrong (although I believe you are), because I don’t know, I’m not claiming I do. But that fact is God wants us to question, God gave us free will to think on our own, and saying God had a hand in anything, is slapping God in the face.

  117. toe4 says: Mar 14, 2011 2:00 PM

    League MVP,

    Here is the kicker to your argument, the debate you so greatly cherished.

    You are right. Completely. Being gay is entirely unnatural, a sin and these people are probably going to burn.

    Now that I have ceded your point answer me this.

    Why can’t they get married? What do you care what a couple of sinners do?

    Are you worried that its going to rub off on you? you might catch the gay?

  118. leaguemvp says: Mar 14, 2011 2:58 PM

    toe4 said-

    “Why can’t they get married? What do you care what a couple of sinners do? ”

    Honestly, i dislike this sin more than most, i admit. having said that, I wouldnt stand in the way of an individual doing what he wants as a person, my problem is when sinners want the gov’t to co sign their activities. They want the gov’t to tell them what god wont, that it is ok to live in sin and this country agrees with that way of life. That brings a curse on the country. True story.

    Next-

    “Are you worried that its going to rub off on you? you might catch the gay?”

    Sorry toe4, it doesnt work like that….much to your dismay I’m sure.

    last thing, not probably going to burn, definately, if they continue being sodomites.

  119. leaguemvp says: Mar 14, 2011 3:19 PM

    CHC36 said-

    “and don’t say its the Devil who is also present in the world, because I can counter just as easily and tell you to prove that it wasn’t Satan’s hand in shooting down the law, because you can’t. Nobody can.”

    Actually sir, I can, and will. right here right now.

    If you had ever taken the time to read the bible, which is gods word to us, you would know that gods word tells us that being a sodomite is a sin. In black and white print, its been there for thousands of years. So im sure if you fnd time to actually research before you post again the book will be still be waiting around for you to get to it.

    That’s a pretty big leap fom me saying god stands behind his word to you saying i said god killed japan. A slight stretch I’d say. Nice try on changing the subject and twisting. Valliant effort sir. Address me head on. No new topics mid paragraph please because you are being crushed by the truth. Stop squirming, it’s unbecoming.

    Did you realize that god destroyed the ENTIRE WORLD by flood, save those that were in the ark.

    Ever heard the phrase the wrath of god?

    And for the record, satan rules this world currently, until he is thrown out by God. So to say the devil couldnt wreak havoc on the workd is naive. It’s flat out wrong. He steals, kills and destroys. And he also loses in the end. The story has already been written and is playing out now.

    Did God or satan cause all of these natural disasters? Who is to say…..but I can tell you that being gay is surely a sin, and sin brings a curse and if your cursed bad things happen.

    Anyway, it WAS gods hand in taking down that law. hello? Gods word is clear on this matter. It’s a sin. Cut and dry. Now you know.

  120. ChopBlockMurph says: Mar 14, 2011 4:13 PM

    You know Aesop’s Fables have been in print for thousands of years, too, right?

  121. leaguemvp says: Mar 14, 2011 4:57 PM

    You cant defend this point against me.

    Telling me its good and right and natural for gays to be gay and get married is like telling me that pigs can fly or that the world is flat.

    No matter how long you try to surgically add wings to the pig to make him fly you’ll fail, pigs werent made by god to fly, just like guys werent made by god to marry other guys.

    Next thing you know though, youll post back saying prove it that the world isnt flat…..and i’ll say great comeback.

    Thanks in advance……

  122. joeflaccosunibrow says: Mar 14, 2011 10:38 PM

    If gay or lesbians want to marry and have the same arguments and gripes I have with my wife, go right ahead.

    In the end, it’s 50% more chance for a lawyer to get their hands on divorce court $$$

  123. toe4 says: Mar 16, 2011 8:45 AM

    By the way, I’ve been replying to you but it took me awhile to realize the H word was not allowing my posts to get through.

  124. slickzmoney says: Mar 16, 2011 1:42 PM

    Non-football issues really bring out the nutters on this site. I could care less about gays getting the right to marry but the way some of you guys think is alarming and dangerous. By the way there is no entity in the sky who is going to punish all the people who don’t share your opinions.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!