<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report:  Owners refused to meet with players last week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbone67</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1019071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tbone67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 02:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1019071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pro-owner? Pro-player?  Really?  

This is American capitalism at it&#039;s best.  God bless the USA.  Both sides had a business agreement that ended.  Both sides posturing for what they think they can get at the end of the day.  Neither side believes they will alienate the fans to the point that we will stop spending. 

Anyone who thinks the owners can ignore them is wrong.  The owners know it.  If they thought they could put a good product on the field without the star power that would sidelined, they would.  They also know that canning them would present an opportunity for an upstart league.  There are enough rich sport fan/businessmen in America to recognize an opportunity.

Personally, I begrudge no one who is trying to get the maximum of their market value (individually or as group).  The trick is not to overplay your cards. 

All big boys pursuing big money from a huge pot.  Neither side is going to starve. Every move from both sides calculated to improve their end gain.  

Let them have at it. I just hope they have underestimated the the third player in the poker game: the fans.  There is a real possibility this goes too far for too long and both sides are revealed as too greedy and unempathetic.  At which point they will need to make concessions (ticket prices, etc) to get us back.

I love a free market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro-owner? Pro-player?  Really?  </p>
<p>This is American capitalism at it&#8217;s best.  God bless the USA.  Both sides had a business agreement that ended.  Both sides posturing for what they think they can get at the end of the day.  Neither side believes they will alienate the fans to the point that we will stop spending. </p>
<p>Anyone who thinks the owners can ignore them is wrong.  The owners know it.  If they thought they could put a good product on the field without the star power that would sidelined, they would.  They also know that canning them would present an opportunity for an upstart league.  There are enough rich sport fan/businessmen in America to recognize an opportunity.</p>
<p>Personally, I begrudge no one who is trying to get the maximum of their market value (individually or as group).  The trick is not to overplay your cards. </p>
<p>All big boys pursuing big money from a huge pot.  Neither side is going to starve. Every move from both sides calculated to improve their end gain.  </p>
<p>Let them have at it. I just hope they have underestimated the the third player in the poker game: the fans.  There is a real possibility this goes too far for too long and both sides are revealed as too greedy and unempathetic.  At which point they will need to make concessions (ticket prices, etc) to get us back.</p>
<p>I love a free market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patpatriotagain</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patpatriotagain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead, and as we’ve said several times, the parties need only to agree that nothing regarding the format or structure of the settlement talks will be used by the NFL against the players in as to the question of whether the decertification of the union was legitimate.
-----------------------------------------------------
and as your readers have pointed out (and anyone with a brain), there&#039;s no way the NFL is going to agree to give up their biggest chip. it&#039;s like agreeing to a cease fire with Al-Qaeda. 

good luck with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead, and as we’ve said several times, the parties need only to agree that nothing regarding the format or structure of the settlement talks will be used by the NFL against the players in as to the question of whether the decertification of the union was legitimate.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
and as your readers have pointed out (and anyone with a brain), there&#8217;s no way the NFL is going to agree to give up their biggest chip. it&#8217;s like agreeing to a cease fire with Al-Qaeda. </p>
<p>good luck with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polegojim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polegojim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Players and owners need a year or so off without those fat paychecks to feel the effect.

Sadly, that means all the little folks will receive the same.  Too bad greed on both sides hurts the innocent as well. 

Sad Sad Sad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Players and owners need a year or so off without those fat paychecks to feel the effect.</p>
<p>Sadly, that means all the little folks will receive the same.  Too bad greed on both sides hurts the innocent as well. </p>
<p>Sad Sad Sad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfl25</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nfl25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[childressrulz says: 
Apr 4, 2011 9:08 AM 
Wow the pro owner crowd refuses to see the writing on the wall. I will make this simple. The bigger someone’s bank account is the less trustworthy they are and they are always a bigger slime ball as well. The rich don’t get rich giving people a fair deal. String the owners up. Worthless dusty old farts! Go Union



this is what most player backers think like. the majority of player backers are 13-19 years old. they love the players and think rich old dudes that run nfl teams arent as cool as the players. i know alot of philly people love the players too, but alot of patriot fans back the owners. sorry but philly fans never make any sense. and i am an eagle fan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>childressrulz says:<br />
Apr 4, 2011 9:08 AM<br />
Wow the pro owner crowd refuses to see the writing on the wall. I will make this simple. The bigger someone’s bank account is the less trustworthy they are and they are always a bigger slime ball as well. The rich don’t get rich giving people a fair deal. String the owners up. Worthless dusty old farts! Go Union</p>
<p>this is what most player backers think like. the majority of player backers are 13-19 years old. they love the players and think rich old dudes that run nfl teams arent as cool as the players. i know alot of philly people love the players too, but alot of patriot fans back the owners. sorry but philly fans never make any sense. and i am an eagle fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfl25</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nfl25]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 18:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[chapnastier says

&quot;Then they filed a law suit, called the owners “slave owners”, ran an aggressive failure of a PR campaign and a true propaganda website with in an attempt to make the owners look like the villains trying to crush the little man. Ultimately the move convinced 3 people who comment on this site and one who runs it while the rest of the football world got the point&quot;

that is so funny and true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chapnastier says</p>
<p>&#8220;Then they filed a law suit, called the owners “slave owners”, ran an aggressive failure of a PR campaign and a true propaganda website with in an attempt to make the owners look like the villains trying to crush the little man. Ultimately the move convinced 3 people who comment on this site and one who runs it while the rest of the football world got the point&#8221;</p>
<p>that is so funny and true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefiesty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thefiesty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owners think they will have the injunction squashed.  If the players had any balls they would have met directly with the owners.  Ofter the players union* walked out there should have been no question of waiting to for Judge Nelson to kill the injunction.  No need to talk to the players lawyers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owners think they will have the injunction squashed.  If the players had any balls they would have met directly with the owners.  Ofter the players union* walked out there should have been no question of waiting to for Judge Nelson to kill the injunction.  No need to talk to the players lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinFan68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinFan68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Buried at the very bottom of a mailbag from ESPN’s John Clayton is a nugget that should have gotten much more prominent treatment from the boys and girls in Bristol...&quot; 

&quot;...So how in the hell is that at the bottom of a Q&amp;A column in the dot-com alphabet junkyard and not on the bottom of the ESPN ticker?&quot;
****************
Mike, based on how you feel about this, why did you let this nugget drop from the top 10 or so articles on this site&#039;s home page?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Buried at the very bottom of a mailbag from ESPN’s John Clayton is a nugget that should have gotten much more prominent treatment from the boys and girls in Bristol&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;So how in the hell is that at the bottom of a Q&amp;A column in the dot-com alphabet junkyard and not on the bottom of the ESPN ticker?&#8221;<br />
****************<br />
Mike, based on how you feel about this, why did you let this nugget drop from the top 10 or so articles on this site&#8217;s home page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danetow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[danetow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The way I see it the owners tried to negotiate in good faith and didn&#039;t even see so much as a counter offer. The players wanted this in court so the owners are obliging their wishes. The players thought the owners would fold to their wishes like they did last time except this time the owners are taking the high road and will just whoop their butts in court.

When push comes to shove the players are EMPLOYEES not employers. The sooner they realize that the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I see it the owners tried to negotiate in good faith and didn&#8217;t even see so much as a counter offer. The players wanted this in court so the owners are obliging their wishes. The players thought the owners would fold to their wishes like they did last time except this time the owners are taking the high road and will just whoop their butts in court.</p>
<p>When push comes to shove the players are EMPLOYEES not employers. The sooner they realize that the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commandercornpone</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[commandercornpone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[which NFLPA* lawyer would the owners have had to meet with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which NFLPA* lawyer would the owners have had to meet with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: airraid77</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[airraid77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the players are going to lose this battle....
THe NFLPA thinks that doty will settle it, and the owners will go over dotys head until they get the decision they want, which at worse will come from the supreme court.
The players are trying to negotiate as a union, while not being recognized as a union.
THey cant reassemble as a union and have the lawsuit......they want both ends. and rightfully so, the owners have said stick it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the players are going to lose this battle&#8230;.<br />
THe NFLPA thinks that doty will settle it, and the owners will go over dotys head until they get the decision they want, which at worse will come from the supreme court.<br />
The players are trying to negotiate as a union, while not being recognized as a union.<br />
THey cant reassemble as a union and have the lawsuit&#8230;&#8230;they want both ends. and rightfully so, the owners have said stick it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davem23</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davem23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This simple like many of you (about 54 of you), this is legal wrangling, that is intended to show the court that they (the NFLPA*) have been negotiation in &quot;good faith&quot;, when it is pretty clear that they never indented to seek common ground. They are trying a last ditch effort to squeeze the threat of litigation &quot;leverage&quot;, to gain even more concessions. To that the NFL says, &quot;SEE YOU IN COURT!&quot; My prediction...the Lock out will continue past the draft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This simple like many of you (about 54 of you), this is legal wrangling, that is intended to show the court that they (the NFLPA*) have been negotiation in &#8220;good faith&#8221;, when it is pretty clear that they never indented to seek common ground. They are trying a last ditch effort to squeeze the threat of litigation &#8220;leverage&#8221;, to gain even more concessions. To that the NFL says, &#8220;SEE YOU IN COURT!&#8221; My prediction&#8230;the Lock out will continue past the draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcbronco</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dcbronco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scud, you forgot to mention the Opt out that took place. That was by far the most important &quot;out&quot;. Without that &quot;out&quot;, no one would be having this discussion right now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scud, you forgot to mention the Opt out that took place. That was by far the most important &#8220;out&#8221;. Without that &#8220;out&#8221;, no one would be having this discussion right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigd9484</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigd9484]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And one more for the pro-players small faction.  The owners OWN the business, as such, they inherit all risks of said business.  The owners raise the prices, because each season, the top player demands more money.  Where does this come from? US.  If salaries remained fixed, you would have every right to whine about prices going up, because owners would just be pocketing that cash.  Unfortunately, since you are pro-player, you should be happy in the knowledge YOU are the reason YOUR prices go up.   Conversely, if an entire team were to tank and go bankrupt, how would that impact any of those players?  Answer:  besides being out of work, it would have no negative impact on those players.   They would get to keep every cent, while the owner would assume all the losses.  This is why the players have no right to do what they are doing.  Not to mention, did you know in the players lawsuit, they are going after the draft and free agency?  They are looking to ruin everything we like about football anyway, so why are you so pro-player?  The players need to put their ego&#039;s down for two seconds and realize they are nothing better than employee&#039;s.  They should be fighting for wages and lifetime health care, end of story.  The mere fact the owners are willing to let the players vote on business-model related items (like the 18 game schedule) is FAR more respectful than what they should get.  THEY took this to court, so if they found out they are about to get their butt&#039;s handed to them, the owners are now more than willing to let it go public.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one more for the pro-players small faction.  The owners OWN the business, as such, they inherit all risks of said business.  The owners raise the prices, because each season, the top player demands more money.  Where does this come from? US.  If salaries remained fixed, you would have every right to whine about prices going up, because owners would just be pocketing that cash.  Unfortunately, since you are pro-player, you should be happy in the knowledge YOU are the reason YOUR prices go up.   Conversely, if an entire team were to tank and go bankrupt, how would that impact any of those players?  Answer:  besides being out of work, it would have no negative impact on those players.   They would get to keep every cent, while the owner would assume all the losses.  This is why the players have no right to do what they are doing.  Not to mention, did you know in the players lawsuit, they are going after the draft and free agency?  They are looking to ruin everything we like about football anyway, so why are you so pro-player?  The players need to put their ego&#8217;s down for two seconds and realize they are nothing better than employee&#8217;s.  They should be fighting for wages and lifetime health care, end of story.  The mere fact the owners are willing to let the players vote on business-model related items (like the 18 game schedule) is FAR more respectful than what they should get.  THEY took this to court, so if they found out they are about to get their butt&#8217;s handed to them, the owners are now more than willing to let it go public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obamaczarofussa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obamaczarofussa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every single NFL &quot;slave&quot; has the right to choose,  not to play for their NFL masa&#039;s.
They can take the college degree they got for being able to run and catch and hit the real world.
They can amaze real world employers with their proficient use of ebonics and their uncanny ability to select gold chains and rims... &quot;fo they whip&quot;.
Please owners, do not give an inch ! Let them feel the cold slap of reality..It&#039;s a humbling the players desperately deserve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every single NFL &#8220;slave&#8221; has the right to choose,  not to play for their NFL masa&#8217;s.<br />
They can take the college degree they got for being able to run and catch and hit the real world.<br />
They can amaze real world employers with their proficient use of ebonics and their uncanny ability to select gold chains and rims&#8230; &#8220;fo they whip&#8221;.<br />
Please owners, do not give an inch ! Let them feel the cold slap of reality..It&#8217;s a humbling the players desperately deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigd9484</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigd9484]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t for one second blame this on the players.  Anyone who thinks its the owners greed is incredibly mistaken.  At 0 hour (when the best negotiating gets done) The owners put an offer on the table that came way across the half way line, and the players were so intent to decertify and go to court, that smith had to try and play it off like the final offer was such a bad deal.  They said &quot;see you in court&quot;  maybe the players side (the lawyers involved in the case) have gotten some information that the owners side may have more of a chance then they thought, hence the offer to return to the table.  At this point (3 days left), the owners are now very happy to look back at the players and go &quot;What? I thought you wanted this settled in court?&quot;  The players deserve this.  If they don&#039;t like how their union head is acting, they need to hold a vote, and get him out, get someone in who is actually acting in their interest instead of trying to make a name for himself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t for one second blame this on the players.  Anyone who thinks its the owners greed is incredibly mistaken.  At 0 hour (when the best negotiating gets done) The owners put an offer on the table that came way across the half way line, and the players were so intent to decertify and go to court, that smith had to try and play it off like the final offer was such a bad deal.  They said &#8220;see you in court&#8221;  maybe the players side (the lawyers involved in the case) have gotten some information that the owners side may have more of a chance then they thought, hence the offer to return to the table.  At this point (3 days left), the owners are now very happy to look back at the players and go &#8220;What? I thought you wanted this settled in court?&#8221;  The players deserve this.  If they don&#8217;t like how their union head is acting, they need to hold a vote, and get him out, get someone in who is actually acting in their interest instead of trying to make a name for himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggeden</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ggeden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just to re-emphasize...

Basically, the NFL has kinda plateaued now. It&#039;s gotten too big and &#039;needs&#039; to die a lot to bring back the integrity again, but it&#039;s also passed the point of no return too. Why a light at the end of the tunnel is always a new fledgling rival league that needs fans, bends backwards for fans, innovates, rules traditional and fan-geared, players appreciative of the chance and genuinely able to be taught in life and football, etc. Read Schottenheimer&#039;s interviews on joining the UFL, how he hates the NFL now, players can&#039;t be taught anymore, too much of a big business, players come and go, players all self-entitled, owners sweep out coaching staffs very quickly, etc.

Think back how the AFL forced the NFL to improve massively and dramatically at the time. Remember where the NFL was at the time, what the AFL did -- innovations on and off-field, racial equality, etc etc. It was the catalyst for the merged NFL becoming the behemoth it is today. Once again, the cycle repeats tho. Where the game is now overall, in every area, is at another point of decay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to re-emphasize&#8230;</p>
<p>Basically, the NFL has kinda plateaued now. It&#8217;s gotten too big and &#8216;needs&#8217; to die a lot to bring back the integrity again, but it&#8217;s also passed the point of no return too. Why a light at the end of the tunnel is always a new fledgling rival league that needs fans, bends backwards for fans, innovates, rules traditional and fan-geared, players appreciative of the chance and genuinely able to be taught in life and football, etc. Read Schottenheimer&#8217;s interviews on joining the UFL, how he hates the NFL now, players can&#8217;t be taught anymore, too much of a big business, players come and go, players all self-entitled, owners sweep out coaching staffs very quickly, etc.</p>
<p>Think back how the AFL forced the NFL to improve massively and dramatically at the time. Remember where the NFL was at the time, what the AFL did &#8212; innovations on and off-field, racial equality, etc etc. It was the catalyst for the merged NFL becoming the behemoth it is today. Once again, the cycle repeats tho. Where the game is now overall, in every area, is at another point of decay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hail2tharedskins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hail2tharedskins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bukes,

Thanks for that i was unaware.  Good to know, I thought they were deleted simply because they didn&#039;t like the content.  Even still, if you gonna delete the links you could at least update the story since the information is clearly out there and from a reliable source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bukes,</p>
<p>Thanks for that i was unaware.  Good to know, I thought they were deleted simply because they didn&#8217;t like the content.  Even still, if you gonna delete the links you could at least update the story since the information is clearly out there and from a reliable source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggeden</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ggeden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very problem with it all is that the NFL is a made business. Generating $9b, that has ruined the very integrity of the sport itself (rules destroying game), the integrity of the NFL itself (corruption of commish, owners raising prices on fans cos they can, knowing fans are addicted), and the integrity of players (becoming wealthy divas and sociopaths who take it all for granted).

This is why whenever a league is fledgling, and trying to make it, it&#039;s always the salad days, a golden era. Like the AFL was. Like the XFL was. Like the UFL is now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very problem with it all is that the NFL is a made business. Generating $9b, that has ruined the very integrity of the sport itself (rules destroying game), the integrity of the NFL itself (corruption of commish, owners raising prices on fans cos they can, knowing fans are addicted), and the integrity of players (becoming wealthy divas and sociopaths who take it all for granted).</p>
<p>This is why whenever a league is fledgling, and trying to make it, it&#8217;s always the salad days, a golden era. Like the AFL was. Like the XFL was. Like the UFL is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bukes111</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bukes111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hail2tharedskins says:  they don&#039;t allow links on this forum and all posts w/ links get deleted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hail2tharedskins says:  they don&#8217;t allow links on this forum and all posts w/ links get deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimphin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimphin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DS: ...&quot; we sent a letter to the National Football League reminding them of something that they know better than anybody else: that discussions on the settlement can occur any time at their convenience...&quot;

I guess they took De at his word when he sent then letter informing them that negotiation can occur ... at their convenience.  I suppose that a couple days before a law suit is not that convenient.

Isn&#039;t this the modern age?  Can&#039;t the NFLPA* just send a counter offer via some type of electronic device?

Doesn&#039;t the next offer need to come from the NFLPA* side?  Do they really expect the NFL to negotioate against their own last offer without a counter offer on the table....errr... modern electronic device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DS: &#8230;&#8221; we sent a letter to the National Football League reminding them of something that they know better than anybody else: that discussions on the settlement can occur any time at their convenience&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess they took De at his word when he sent then letter informing them that negotiation can occur &#8230; at their convenience.  I suppose that a couple days before a law suit is not that convenient.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t this the modern age?  Can&#8217;t the NFLPA* just send a counter offer via some type of electronic device?</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the next offer need to come from the NFLPA* side?  Do they really expect the NFL to negotioate against their own last offer without a counter offer on the table&#8230;.errr&#8230; modern electronic device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myspaceyourface</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[myspaceyourface]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The owners need to plan to move on without these current players.  

1. Expand the draft to 15 rounds for 2011

2. Open a FA signing period for 30 days after the draft.

3. Hold open tryouts

4. Give the current players an opportunity to return to work, under their current contracts, during the first week of August
(think you will be surprised how many come back)

5. Schedule camps, preseason, and regular season games as planed.  Show the players that you are serious about moving on without them.

6. After 4 weeks of the season are in the books, give all remaining players 5 business days to return to work.  If they choose not to, make it clear that this is their last chance to do so.


 
THE LEAGUE LIVES ON.  For everyone that disagrees with this, keep in mind the average NFL career is 3.3 years.

It would only take a season or two of drafts and FA signings to get the NFL back to the standard.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owners need to plan to move on without these current players.  </p>
<p>1. Expand the draft to 15 rounds for 2011</p>
<p>2. Open a FA signing period for 30 days after the draft.</p>
<p>3. Hold open tryouts</p>
<p>4. Give the current players an opportunity to return to work, under their current contracts, during the first week of August<br />
(think you will be surprised how many come back)</p>
<p>5. Schedule camps, preseason, and regular season games as planed.  Show the players that you are serious about moving on without them.</p>
<p>6. After 4 weeks of the season are in the books, give all remaining players 5 business days to return to work.  If they choose not to, make it clear that this is their last chance to do so.</p>
<p>THE LEAGUE LIVES ON.  For everyone that disagrees with this, keep in mind the average NFL career is 3.3 years.</p>
<p>It would only take a season or two of drafts and FA signings to get the NFL back to the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bukes111</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bukes111]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ chapnastier
_________________________________

Well 50% of every dollar a company makes is misleading considering that the NFL takes a billion off the top before they calculate the 50%.  On top of that, the owners are asking for another billion off the top (although that number should come down when they enter serious negotiations).  Then take into consideration that there are revenue streams out there that the owners collect that are not part of the collective bargaining agreement.  So in reality, we&#039;re talking somewhere closer to a 60 40 split in favor of the owners.  
And finally, we&#039;re talking about a cap, not a payroll minimum.  No one&#039;s putting a gun to the owner&#039;s head and forcing them to use the whole cap.  The spread between the lowest and highest payroll was around 60 million.  So in reality, the 40% that the players are entitled to won&#039;t be completely utilized.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ chapnastier<br />
_________________________________</p>
<p>Well 50% of every dollar a company makes is misleading considering that the NFL takes a billion off the top before they calculate the 50%.  On top of that, the owners are asking for another billion off the top (although that number should come down when they enter serious negotiations).  Then take into consideration that there are revenue streams out there that the owners collect that are not part of the collective bargaining agreement.  So in reality, we&#8217;re talking somewhere closer to a 60 40 split in favor of the owners.<br />
And finally, we&#8217;re talking about a cap, not a payroll minimum.  No one&#8217;s putting a gun to the owner&#8217;s head and forcing them to use the whole cap.  The spread between the lowest and highest payroll was around 60 million.  So in reality, the 40% that the players are entitled to won&#8217;t be completely utilized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpiotr01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpiotr01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nelson should order them back to mediation for another two weeks. Someone needs to act like an adult here.


And FWIW, why should the league meet and negotiate with a union pretending to not be a union for the sole purpose of breaking the league&#039;s back? If the PA* wanted to keep negotiating they shouldn&#039;t have gone through with the sham decertification. My guess is, the league thinks that even if Nelson rules for the players, they still have a great chance of winning in the appeals process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nelson should order them back to mediation for another two weeks. Someone needs to act like an adult here.</p>
<p>And FWIW, why should the league meet and negotiate with a union pretending to not be a union for the sole purpose of breaking the league&#8217;s back? If the PA* wanted to keep negotiating they shouldn&#8217;t have gone through with the sham decertification. My guess is, the league thinks that even if Nelson rules for the players, they still have a great chance of winning in the appeals process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: realitypolice</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[realitypolice]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing to me what little understanding people have about how the legal machinations work on a case like this.

Neither side is going to &quot;win&quot; the anti-trust lawsuit in terms of a trial verdict.  This case will never, ever, see trial.

The players are not going to win and end the draft or restrictions on player movement.

The owners are not going to win and be able to impose any conditions they want on the players.

The key question is will the lockout stand or not.  Once this is settled through the hearing beginning this week, negotiations will proceed with one side having considerable leverage over the other.

Whichever side has this leverage will get a deal more favorable to them.   

This deal will then be entered with the court as the &quot;settlement&quot; of the lawsuit.  

And all of this will happen within the next 4 months.

Trust me.  I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me what little understanding people have about how the legal machinations work on a case like this.</p>
<p>Neither side is going to &#8220;win&#8221; the anti-trust lawsuit in terms of a trial verdict.  This case will never, ever, see trial.</p>
<p>The players are not going to win and end the draft or restrictions on player movement.</p>
<p>The owners are not going to win and be able to impose any conditions they want on the players.</p>
<p>The key question is will the lockout stand or not.  Once this is settled through the hearing beginning this week, negotiations will proceed with one side having considerable leverage over the other.</p>
<p>Whichever side has this leverage will get a deal more favorable to them.   </p>
<p>This deal will then be entered with the court as the &#8220;settlement&#8221; of the lawsuit.  </p>
<p>And all of this will happen within the next 4 months.</p>
<p>Trust me.  I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinFan68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FinFan68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The players want the owners to settle the anti-trust lawsuits. Settling would imply that the suits have merit. That would give the players a little more leverage in the CBA negotiations. Trying to equate a lawsuit settlement with a CBA is faulty logic. The owners would be willing to negotiate with the NFLPA, but that would require dropping the suit and recertifying the union. The players do not want to do that right now, thus, they do not want to negotiate a new CBA right now. They just want to settle the lawsuit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The players want the owners to settle the anti-trust lawsuits. Settling would imply that the suits have merit. That would give the players a little more leverage in the CBA negotiations. Trying to equate a lawsuit settlement with a CBA is faulty logic. The owners would be willing to negotiate with the NFLPA, but that would require dropping the suit and recertifying the union. The players do not want to do that right now, thus, they do not want to negotiate a new CBA right now. They just want to settle the lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scudbot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scudbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3octaveFart says:
Apr 4, 2011 9:30 AM
scudbot says: Apr 4, 2011 8:41 AM

“The players opened this door.”

..right after the owners locked the doors.

---

The players walked out and the union was disbanded while their reps were still negotiating with the owners so they could go to court.  1. Walkout, then 2. Lockout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3octaveFart says:<br />
Apr 4, 2011 9:30 AM<br />
scudbot says: Apr 4, 2011 8:41 AM</p>
<p>“The players opened this door.”</p>
<p>..right after the owners locked the doors.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>The players walked out and the union was disbanded while their reps were still negotiating with the owners so they could go to court.  1. Walkout, then 2. Lockout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angrycorgi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angrycorgi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now the players want to meet...even though THEY rolled out in the first place?  What the heck??  I guess the fact that their counsel shamelessly begged Doty recently to make a ruling on an injunction, despite the fact that it wasn&#039;t his job...tells me the players&#039; counsel is starting to sweat without their favorite back-pocket judge on the case.

Honestly, I wish they would all just sit down...no lawyers or NFLPA* morons on either side and just 5 owners and 5 players and let them hash it out.  All this mess is doing is shoveling tons of cash in the lawyers&#039; pockets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the players want to meet&#8230;even though THEY rolled out in the first place?  What the heck??  I guess the fact that their counsel shamelessly begged Doty recently to make a ruling on an injunction, despite the fact that it wasn&#8217;t his job&#8230;tells me the players&#8217; counsel is starting to sweat without their favorite back-pocket judge on the case.</p>
<p>Honestly, I wish they would all just sit down&#8230;no lawyers or NFLPA* morons on either side and just 5 owners and 5 players and let them hash it out.  All this mess is doing is shoveling tons of cash in the lawyers&#8217; pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tednancy</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tednancy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the owners determined that by meeting with the NFLPA&#039;s &quot;advisors&quot; would be tantamount to acknowledging the legitimacy of decertification?

If so, I don&#039;t blame them one bit for refusing to play right into the hands of this greedy power grab by DeSmith.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the owners determined that by meeting with the NFLPA&#8217;s &#8220;advisors&#8221; would be tantamount to acknowledging the legitimacy of decertification?</p>
<p>If so, I don&#8217;t blame them one bit for refusing to play right into the hands of this greedy power grab by DeSmith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapnastier</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018215</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chapnastier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ 30octave

Since you are so smart you are fully aware that you can post from smart phones right? There is a PFT app and it is actually quite cool. For all you know I am on a flight, sitting in an airport, on the road, or doing some sort of work that doesn&#039;t involve pushing papers across a desk like you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 30octave</p>
<p>Since you are so smart you are fully aware that you can post from smart phones right? There is a PFT app and it is actually quite cool. For all you know I am on a flight, sitting in an airport, on the road, or doing some sort of work that doesn&#8217;t involve pushing papers across a desk like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hail2tharedskins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/04/report-owners-refused-to-meet-with-playerslast-week/#comment-1018212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hail2tharedskins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=121184#comment-1018212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happened to the links I provided with the letters that the NFLPA published that clearly showed that players&#039; counsel was not expecting any meeting anytime soon???

Wow, I just typed a reply defending the author&#039;s against multiple claims of bias and my links that are clearly relevant and published by the NFLPA are deleted???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the links I provided with the letters that the NFLPA published that clearly showed that players&#8217; counsel was not expecting any meeting anytime soon???</p>
<p>Wow, I just typed a reply defending the author&#8217;s against multiple claims of bias and my links that are clearly relevant and published by the NFLPA are deleted???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
