Skip to content

NFL teams plan to open facilities Friday morning

NFL And Players Continue Court Ordered Mediation Getty Images

NFL teams are turning players away from team facilities this morning. But they won’t do that tomorrow, barring an appeals court giving the league an immediate stay of Judge Susan Nelson’s order ending the lockout.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said on today’s PFT Live that, unless something happens with the appeals court this afternoon, players should be allowed into team facilities tomorrow.

“We — just moments ago — notified our clubs that we think it’s appropriate under the circumstances to take additional steps in response to the injunction,” Aiello said. “So the facilities will open tomorrow at 8 a.m. Eastern time. In the meantime, clubs are free immediately to start contacting players and let them know when the facilities will be open for use.”

Aiello said players can also go to team headquarters for medical exams, meetings with coaches, distribution of playbooks and film study, among other things. And that all 32 clubs can start setting up schedules for organized team activities.

Shortly after Aiello’s appearance, the NFL issued a statement saying that voluntary workouts can begin as well. Players will be paid $130 a day for showing up and, more importantly, these workouts will count toward any offseason workout bonus in the player’s contract. So for players like D’Brickashaw Ferguson, this news could be worth $750,000.

That doesn’t mean, however, that the league year has begun: Transactions like trades and free agent signings can’t start just yet.

“Judge Nelson said it was up to us to determine how to proceed, and we think in light of the fact that the first round of the draft is tonight, clubs are fully focused on that,” Aiello said. “The best way to proceed is for the veterans to start working out at facilities tomorrow, and then we’ll set up the process of starting the league year, which would include player trades and player signings. . . . No player transactions until we start the league year.”

So there will be no trades of players under contract today, although it’s at least theoretically possible that the league year could start tomorrow and players under contract could be traded tomorrow and the next day, during Rounds 2-7 of the draft.

Of course, all of this is moot if the appeals court ruling goes the way the NFL is hoping.

“If they issue that stay, these arrangements would change, obviously,” Aiello said.

So stay tuned.

Permalink 51 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
51 Responses to “NFL teams plan to open facilities Friday morning”
  1. shamburg says: Apr 28, 2011 12:52 PM

    B.S.!!! Let the Brids trade Kolb!!!

  2. armchairgm9 says: Apr 28, 2011 12:53 PM

    Finally, the league does something right.

  3. 411dooleybug1 says: Apr 28, 2011 12:54 PM

    Why would they shoot themselves in the foot and not allow player trades during the first round of the draft? From a team betterment standpoint, it’s illogical.

  4. jennstergersburnedretinas says: Apr 28, 2011 12:55 PM

    Ugh…

    START FREE AGENCY JERKS!!!

    ALLOW PLAYER/DRAFT PICK TRADES!!!

    Make tonight more interesting by starting the league year immediately. It would be the most amazing draft ever, complete with free agent signings and player trades.

  5. wydok says: Apr 28, 2011 12:56 PM

    But WHY? Why would they prevent FA signings and trading on the 1st round draft day? It’s ridiculous. It’s like the NFL is conspiring against the Eagles so that Kolb can’t get traded for a draft pick this year.

    I bet this is because nobody felt like having to work hard today.

  6. madenatewell says: Apr 28, 2011 12:57 PM

    This is all a bunch of poo…screw the appeal and get back to the table. All this sitting on your thumbs is doing squat.

  7. irisht53 says: Apr 28, 2011 12:58 PM

    Here’s a fun thought, with no CBA and more importantly, no Union, can the league unilaterally decide to push back the beginning of the 2011 year to July 1st?

    Meaning the doors would be open, players could work out, meet and rehab at the team facilities, however no player movement other than re-signing your own players.

    That would be interesting workaround to the lockout, in that the lock out would be lifted, but players aren’t getting new contracts.

  8. duanethomas says: Apr 28, 2011 12:58 PM

    Will teams still cut pay and layoff employees with players returning? That really made sense, no players in the off season, which means cost should be down. Now players are back and cost will go up, (workouts, medical, equipment etc…) but no employees will be laid off. The owners are something……….

  9. barneyrumble says: Apr 28, 2011 12:59 PM

    You jested in the previous story about reseating the arrest meter to 0 over an obstinate owner.

    Three questions

    1. What would really happen if one of the owners keeps the gates locked?

    2. What is the chance that one of them would risk that?

    3. Who are the likely candidates to do so?

  10. mvp43 says: Apr 28, 2011 12:59 PM

    Basically if the Stay is issued, the NFL will win this in the long run. It will now turn into a long drawn out court procees that will more than likely last well into the regular season. That means that the players will not be receiving their paychecks…….that will force the players hands and the union will have to agree to the leauges terms……………..I think?

  11. quirtevans says: Apr 28, 2011 12:59 PM

    What a shock. What a surprise.

    Goodell’s an excellent lawyer. He wasn’t going to put the league in the position of being in contempt of court. That could affect the appeals court’s attitude about the appeal.

    At the same time, they’re doing the things that are minimally necessary in order to avoid being in contempt of court, while avoiding the larger steps in hope that the 8th Circuit will either stay or overturn Judge Nelson’s decision. In effect, they’re complying, but dragging their feet.

    Either they really believe the 8th Circuit will issue an emergency stay, or they’re doing this as a sop to the militant owners who want to pick a fight.

    But you had to know that they’d open the facilities. To ignore the judge’s order that flagrantly and that completely would have put the league in severe jeopardy.

  12. anonymouslyanonymouscommentor says: Apr 28, 2011 1:02 PM

    Really disappointing as an Ealges fan we won’t be able to trade Kolb…it almost seems like the league is trying to avoid trades tonight for some reason. Why not just start league activities now?

  13. skoobyfl says: Apr 28, 2011 1:02 PM

    I wonder which coach has the nerve to invite their players into the house & then kick them out later that day. I’d talk to the CB / SS before I’d talk to the guys on the line, just in case.

  14. arrogantathlete says: Apr 28, 2011 1:02 PM

    It must be uncomfortable feeling when the players get to the facilities and they have to meet the people that were called “liars” “greedy””slave owners” but then again its the union mentality and they expect everything being handed to them.

  15. kissbillsrings says: Apr 28, 2011 1:03 PM

    If the nfl gets their stay (& I hope it does) the players 7 owners better sit down & get that CBA worked out immediatly!!!!

  16. waitingguilty says: Apr 28, 2011 1:05 PM

    Either way, the concept of team’s drafting for each other is now in play.

    In other words, MIN drafts a RB in the 4th for WAS and Monday McNabb gets traded for that player’s rights.

    This is going to be a fun weekend!

  17. feartheelf19 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:07 PM

    Cant they just let there be trades, it would make tonights 1st round so much more interesting. I feel as though there would be a massive uproar and it would make everyones mocks a mess.

    Hey Judge Nelson, you better keep your ruling in place, dont go messing with our heads.

  18. jdl1325 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:07 PM

    The Eagles are the big loser in this decision. They will be able to trade Kolb a day or two after he could bring them any value for 2011.

  19. Deb says: Apr 28, 2011 1:07 PM

    Bet Aiello was choking on that. What a twit.

  20. gdive says: Apr 28, 2011 1:10 PM

    The NFL would have been looked at in a much better light if they had released this statement a day after the Judge’s ruling. They could have still appealed but at least they wouldn’t have alienated the fans or their own players.

  21. narutofan10 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:13 PM

    the nfl has screwed themselves the appeals court is gonna deny the stay because it was already denied and in fact the nfl has played dumb for two days following the initial ruling they dug their own grave just play football

  22. bigd9484 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:14 PM

    Start the league year already you bastards! Drinking Draft 2011 needs the uncertainty and penalty points for trades!

  23. savocabol1 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:14 PM

    Couldn’t the league just temporarily suspend the league year for an indefinite amount of time thereby effectively creating a mini lockout of sorts?

  24. p4ever says: Apr 28, 2011 1:15 PM

    There is the irreparable harm to free agent players…

  25. 8drinkminimum says: Apr 28, 2011 1:16 PM

    Well if the appeal fails and the owners turtle then it’s on to the season.

    Enjoy it because when this CBA does expire and court action isn’t available to either side we are probably looking at one very long, tough negotiation and that particular season will be in doubt.

  26. eacuna05 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:21 PM

    That picture says it all: Jerry: ” I thought we hired you to take care of our money, Roger.”

    Roger: “I tried Jerry, I tried.” (tears)

  27. footballking5 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:22 PM

    Nothing the owners are doing is making sense ritght now. You want to keep the lockout going because it will hurt the business? Not playing football will hurt your business more than anything. Your business is football. Not allowing trades and free agency makes zero sense. Who is running things down there, the government?

  28. snowpea84 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:23 PM

    I was really looking forward to letting the Eagles trade away their best QB. Now they will have a QB when their starting RB goes down to injury, as he always does. Or when he fakes injury after getting picked apart by the AFC East.

  29. koch23jk says: Apr 28, 2011 1:23 PM

    Eagles fans need to quit whining about trading Kolb. I realize you are trying to get rid of him and strike while the iron is hot but the only reason anyone would take a chance on him is because there is no clear cut franchise QB in the draft and there about 12 teams with questions at the position.

  30. babyjesus69 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:30 PM

    Thank God for this weekend! I was already tiring of the nba and hockey playoffs

  31. 505phillyguy says: Apr 28, 2011 1:34 PM

    Basically, the NFL couldn’t obtain a stay from the court so it decided to impose its own stay. I hope that the players move for the owners to be held in contempt. They are in direct defiance of the court’s order to start “business as usual.”

    If the owners and Goddell really want football to start, they should do so instead of delaying in hopes of one day winning in court.

  32. pondbridge says: Apr 28, 2011 1:36 PM

    Step 1: Kill all the lawyers.

    The judge says return to work, and yet the NFL attorneys who have screwed up everything so far are insisting that the league year has not begun, screwing up free agency AND trades in the draft for existing players.

    The NFL lawyers better not be paid on a merit basis. If so, they owe billions for their multiple screw ups.

  33. skindome1234 says: Apr 28, 2011 1:38 PM

    Relax folks. be sure that if league opens tomorrow or monday that teams who intended to trade players (KOLB ect.) can just have a team make a pick for them in secret and then make player trades (KOLB for player drafted ) either Fri or Mon

  34. blackcatnfl says: Apr 28, 2011 1:44 PM

    Exactly how do we know this draft even matters one hill of beans? What legal right does the NFL currently have to restrict a person coming out of college from signing with whatever team they want?

    Or am I asking the question that should not be asked?

  35. laeaglefan says: Apr 28, 2011 1:50 PM

    If trades could start today, sure it would be chaotic, but it would be lots of fun too!

  36. quirtevans says: Apr 28, 2011 1:51 PM

    Someone should really do an analysis of how many draft-day trades in the past involved veterans. My guess is, not many.

    Draft day trades, going just on my recollection, are most commonly pick-for-picks. (Sometimes, they involve an already-picked player … but usually not a veteran.)

    So, even if the NFL were to allow trades before or during the draft, I don’t think it would make much of a difference.

  37. thephantomstranger says: Apr 28, 2011 1:54 PM

    What does this mean for signing undrafted rookie free agents after the draft?

  38. vaphinfan says: Apr 28, 2011 2:06 PM

    No idea why are you Eagles fans are so mad about this. When VICK falls on his face this year, and he will, (hes old and legs can only take you so far), who is going to be your QB then?

  39. rusty81 says: Apr 28, 2011 2:09 PM

    i pose the question, that since each team is its own entity, and the CBA and union no longer exist, why can’t teams (i.e. individual businesses) go about aquiring any players not currently under contract (i.e. new employees)??? free agency is in effect wide open for each team, regardless of what Goodell says…

  40. zaggs says: Apr 28, 2011 2:11 PM

    “505phillyguy says: Apr 28, 2011 1:34 PM

    Basically, the NFL couldn’t obtain a stay from the court so it decided to impose its own stay. I hope that the players move for the owners to be held in contempt. They are in direct defiance of the court’s order to start “business as usual.” ”

    Figures you’re from philly. All Nelson said was that the league had to stop locking out players. She specifically said the league did not have to enter into contracts with players. If they do not have to enter into contracts with players, they do not have to terminate/reclass contracts either which would be required for free agency. Nelson did not say they had to start the season, she did not say they had to allow trades. Also not entering into contracts would mean that the NFL did not have to enter into contracts for injury insurance for workouts.

  41. geo1113 says: Apr 28, 2011 2:13 PM

    “Someone should really do an analysis of how many draft-day trades in the past involved veterans.”

    Go for it, quirtevans!

  42. mvp43 says: Apr 28, 2011 2:14 PM

    kissbillsrings says:
    Apr 28, 2011 1:03 PM
    If the nfl gets their stay (& I hope it does) the players 7 owners better sit down & get that CBA worked out immediatly!!!!

    ——————————————-

    I hope they get their stay too, but working out a CBA is the last thing the owners want (at least now). They would rather force the players hands by dragging this out as long as they can. Come season time when the paychecks aren’t rolling in, that’s when the players will start banging on De’s door to get this resolved.

  43. quirtevans says: Apr 28, 2011 2:21 PM

    “”All Nelson said was that the league had to stop locking out players. She specifically said the league did not have to enter into contracts with players. ”

    No, that’s not what she said. What she said was, no team has to enter into contracts. She did NOT say that the league didn’t have to enter into contracts with players, because …. THE LEAGUE DOES NOT ENTER INTO CONTRACTS WITH PLAYERS. Teams do.

    If all 32 teams collectively refuse to enter into contracts with players, that’s collusion. That’s an anti-trust violation.

    The league is playing with fire.

  44. savocabol1 says: Apr 28, 2011 2:27 PM

    quirtevans says:
    Apr 28, 2011 1:51 PM
    Someone should really do an analysis of how many draft-day trades in the past involved veterans. My guess is, not many.

    Draft day trades, going just on my recollection, are most commonly pick-for-picks. (Sometimes, they involve an already-picked player … but usually not a veteran.)

    So, even if the NFL were to allow trades before or during the draft, I don’t think it would make much of a difference.

    _______________________

    Go to wikipedia or something because there is mulitple draft day trades that involve players every year during every round. Most years you even have some big name players being traded as well.

  45. igglesfan9 says: Apr 28, 2011 2:57 PM

    So if the league year hasn’t started, does this mean that players drafted this weekend will automatically accrue one year of service when the league year does begin?

  46. quirtevans says: Apr 28, 2011 2:58 PM

    I’m willing to believe you … however, my recollection is that trades of veterans for draft choices usually happen pre-draft. For example, Donovan McNabb was traded April 4th, more than two weeks before the draft. The year before, Jay Cutler was traded on April 2nd. Richard Seymour was traded on September 6th for draft choices.

    So, there, I’ve done some research on recent “big name players”. If there are multiple draft day trades involving veterans, it’s your turn, do you have some examples?

  47. quirtevans says: Apr 28, 2011 3:27 PM

    “So if the league year hasn’t started, does this mean that players drafted this weekend will automatically accrue one year of service when the league year does begin?”

    There are three answers to that question.

    One, years of service is a concept from the collective bargaining agreement. If there’s no CBA, years of service do not matter.

    Two, in the absence of a CBA, the owners can do whatever they like, and live with the potential anti-trust consequences.

    Three, eventually, this will all be resolved through a new collective bargaining agreement, which will no doubt specify what rights the draftees have. (And which will no doubt give them the short end of the stick.)

  48. fatelvis77 says: Apr 28, 2011 3:35 PM

    Hello Philadelphia: You are NOT getting a number 1 for Kolb and you never were. Once other teams know you want to get rid of a guy, “No #1 for you.”

  49. thefiesty1 says: Apr 28, 2011 4:27 PM

    In the meantime, move on until the appeals court over turns Obama-Nelson. Politics – what a way to screw up a wet dream.

  50. hatesycophants says: Apr 28, 2011 4:55 PM

    Some of you folks are among the dumbest people on the planet. Irredeemably stupid. However, the real evil amongst us is those who think the rest of us are dumber than you.

    Keep on shilling for billionaires! Hey, why not save yourselves some angst and send your kid’s college fund to the Koch brothers or some other billionaire who would just as soon grind your bones for fuel as give you the time of day?

  51. puregreed says: Apr 28, 2011 7:10 PM

    hatesycophants says: Apr 28, 2011 4:55 PM

    Some of you folks are among the dumbest people on the planet. Irredeemably stupid. However, the real evil amongst us is those who think the rest of us are dumber than you.

    Keep on shilling for billionaires! Hey, why not save yourselves some angst and send your kid’s college fund to the Koch brothers or some other billionaire who would just as soon grind your bones for fuel as give you the time of day?

    ___________________________________

    I agree with this and because of this I will not purchase anything from the NFL this year, not a ticket, hat, jersey, sunday ticket, nothing. I will watch what game is televised nationally and follow online. How about you hatesycophants? I assume you won’t be one of “dumbest people on the planet” and support those billionares or millionares will you?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!