<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The same judges will handle the motion for a stay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:07:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eagleswin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eagleswin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 19:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thefiesty1 says:May 2, 2011 1:53 PM 

Good, only one of the three are a liberal. The other two will likely keep the majority option.
----------------------

I&#039;m going to take the unusual position here of saying that it&#039;s not a slam dunk that the one dissenting judge will rule against the permanent stay.  I may just be overly optimistic but i think his problem was specifically with the emergency stay only. 

We&#039;ll know soon enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thefiesty1 says:May 2, 2011 1:53 PM </p>
<p>Good, only one of the three are a liberal. The other two will likely keep the majority option.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to take the unusual position here of saying that it&#8217;s not a slam dunk that the one dissenting judge will rule against the permanent stay.  I may just be overly optimistic but i think his problem was specifically with the emergency stay only. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll know soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefiesty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thefiesty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, only one of the three are a liberal. The other two will likely keep the majority option.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, only one of the three are a liberal. The other two will likely keep the majority option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eagleswin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eagleswin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[olcap says:May 2, 2011 12:31 PM 

Hey, it’s the 8th Circuit Court Of Corporate Lapdogs to the rescue of the billionaire mommy’s boys.
-----------------------------

Seems like just yesterday the player supporters where praising the justice system and saying the law is the law.  It doesn&#039;t feel so good right now does it?

The owners may still lose this, I understand that but it&#039;s not nearly the slam dunk that the player supporters and PFT would have you believe.

I&#039;d also like to point out to the people who think that one court should always rule the same as another court that there is a reason the players filed in Minnesota.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olcap says:May 2, 2011 12:31 PM </p>
<p>Hey, it’s the 8th Circuit Court Of Corporate Lapdogs to the rescue of the billionaire mommy’s boys.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Seems like just yesterday the player supporters where praising the justice system and saying the law is the law.  It doesn&#8217;t feel so good right now does it?</p>
<p>The owners may still lose this, I understand that but it&#8217;s not nearly the slam dunk that the player supporters and PFT would have you believe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to point out to the people who think that one court should always rule the same as another court that there is a reason the players filed in Minnesota.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olcap</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olcap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, it&#039;s the 8th Circuit Court Of Corporate Lapdogs to the rescue of the billionaire mommy&#039;s boys.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it&#8217;s the 8th Circuit Court Of Corporate Lapdogs to the rescue of the billionaire mommy&#8217;s boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rad312</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rad312]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UFL provides the UDFA an option for employment to play football on a professional as does the CFL.  It may not carry the same cache or paycheck that playing in the NFL does however does this constitute irreparable harm?.?.?

Get back to the table and hammer out a deal - that is the key!

Not whether an UDFA can sign with an NFL club, or can the Eagles trade Kolb, or player X can sign club Y.

We would all like to see the business of football begin however it is important that all parties understand the system that will be in place and further important elements of the system will not be challenged in court (hello, Mr. Kessler).

Get back to the table and hammer out a new CBA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UFL provides the UDFA an option for employment to play football on a professional as does the CFL.  It may not carry the same cache or paycheck that playing in the NFL does however does this constitute irreparable harm?.?.?</p>
<p>Get back to the table and hammer out a deal &#8211; that is the key!</p>
<p>Not whether an UDFA can sign with an NFL club, or can the Eagles trade Kolb, or player X can sign club Y.</p>
<p>We would all like to see the business of football begin however it is important that all parties understand the system that will be in place and further important elements of the system will not be challenged in court (hello, Mr. Kessler).</p>
<p>Get back to the table and hammer out a new CBA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoxitic</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049479</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zoxitic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get ready for the UFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get ready for the UFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpoppa808</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigpoppa808]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 15:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow Mike!  How come you didn&#039;t dissect the decisions and political ties of the previous judge that ruled in favor of the players?  Seems like biased reporting to me, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the first time of allowing your liberal emotions to reflect in your posts.  I do hope they lift the stay so NFL business can continue while they take the next few months to listen to the arguments and finally make a ruling on the appeal.  I think that would satisfy the fans (temporarily)  while the 2 sides go at it in court.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Mike!  How come you didn&#8217;t dissect the decisions and political ties of the previous judge that ruled in favor of the players?  Seems like biased reporting to me, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the first time of allowing your liberal emotions to reflect in your posts.  I do hope they lift the stay so NFL business can continue while they take the next few months to listen to the arguments and finally make a ruling on the appeal.  I think that would satisfy the fans (temporarily)  while the 2 sides go at it in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfridley</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bfridley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A month in advance... meaning that the ball won&#039;t even get rolling until a month after this information is even announced... fantastic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A month in advance&#8230; meaning that the ball won&#8217;t even get rolling until a month after this information is even announced&#8230; fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobartbaker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hobartbaker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 14:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A motion to &quot;stay&quot; was made, but since many of the players have yet to learn to scratch at the door to be let out to &quot;do their business&quot; or stop climbing up on the couch, it will likely have litte effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A motion to &#8220;stay&#8221; was made, but since many of the players have yet to learn to scratch at the door to be let out to &#8220;do their business&#8221; or stop climbing up on the couch, it will likely have litte effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sj39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sj39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 13:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yawn, wake me when it&#039;s over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn, wake me when it&#8217;s over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownsfn</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownsfn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[13 days since an arrest...well that should be reset any day now...the wait begins....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13 days since an arrest&#8230;well that should be reset any day now&#8230;the wait begins&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr92687</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/05/02/the-same-judges-will-handle-the-motion-for-a-stay/#comment-1049363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr92687]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=128706#comment-1049363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uh oh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh oh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
