<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NFL sends letter to club using Chris Johnson&#8217;s image in uniform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/17/nfl-sends-letter-to-party-to-club-using-chris-johnsons-image-in-uniform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/17/nfl-sends-letter-to-party-to-club-using-chris-johnsons-image-in-uniform/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 808raiderinparadise</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/17/nfl-sends-letter-to-party-to-club-using-chris-johnsons-image-in-uniform/#comment-1099785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[808raiderinparadise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=136109#comment-1099785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Act on Deck&quot; son]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Act on Deck&#8221; son</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpmelon</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/17/nfl-sends-letter-to-party-to-club-using-chris-johnsons-image-in-uniform/#comment-1099728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jpmelon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=136109#comment-1099728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Ah, yes. But the league didn’t previously send those dozens of letters during a lockout when we had nothing else to write about.&quot;

Wow, you guys are really looking for crap to write about....there was another post on a different thread with a good suggestion....it&#039;s gonna be a ton of work, but I&#039;d be interested to see it as well as the guy who first wrote it (yesterday I think).

Can you make a list of the top 20 players from each team in the league and explain their contract situations. Everyone is a little confused right now because no one understands (or knows) the new free agency rules because they don&#039;t yet exist. If you took that list and organized it by what players would be free agents if the new rules allow teams to hold onto players for 6 years, then 5 years, then 4 years.....obviously, the 4 year bracket would have all the same players that were in the 6th and 5 year bracket.

It&#039;d be interesting and it would make a lot of us readers sound smarter when we talk about this sort of thing. Get busy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ah, yes. But the league didn’t previously send those dozens of letters during a lockout when we had nothing else to write about.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, you guys are really looking for crap to write about&#8230;.there was another post on a different thread with a good suggestion&#8230;.it&#8217;s gonna be a ton of work, but I&#8217;d be interested to see it as well as the guy who first wrote it (yesterday I think).</p>
<p>Can you make a list of the top 20 players from each team in the league and explain their contract situations. Everyone is a little confused right now because no one understands (or knows) the new free agency rules because they don&#8217;t yet exist. If you took that list and organized it by what players would be free agents if the new rules allow teams to hold onto players for 6 years, then 5 years, then 4 years&#8230;..obviously, the 4 year bracket would have all the same players that were in the 6th and 5 year bracket.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be interesting and it would make a lot of us readers sound smarter when we talk about this sort of thing. Get busy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
