Skip to content

There’s still a minor reason to be mildly concerned

Champagne_BrendanSmialowskiGetty460 Getty Images

With the new labor deal looking even more inevitable than ever, and with all signs pointing to an agreement coming by Tuesday at the latest, there’s reason to be at least a little concerned until the two sides apply their Herbie Hancocks to the settlement documents.

The owners, for example, are concerned that NFLPA* lawyers Jeffrey Kessler and/or Jim Quinn will make a Hail Mary effort to blow up the talks, focusing on an issue that was overlooked or underestimated during the negotiations and trying to pump it a dealbreaker.  (It doesn’t matter whether they will or would; the reality is that the owners are concerned that they may give it a try.)

And as one member of the media pointed out earlier tonight, another bait-and-switch by ownership could cause a major problem between the parties.  Last month, the owners reportedly changed terms that the players believed already had been the subject of an agreement.  The move nearly caused the talks to collapse.

So, basically, we’re leaving the pink champagne on ice while we all remain prisoners of the lockout, not of our own device.  Hopefully, they’ll kill that damn beast soon.

Permalink 80 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories, Union
80 Responses to “There’s still a minor reason to be mildly concerned”
  1. kremis says: Jul 15, 2011 11:17 PM

    THERE IT IS!!!!!THE COLD WATER

  2. greatminnesotasportsmind says: Jul 15, 2011 11:18 PM

    Damn lawyers trying to “earn” that extra buck.

  3. 1kcfan says: Jul 15, 2011 11:19 PM

    Just get the damned thing signed already!!!!!

  4. vikesfan4life says: Jul 15, 2011 11:22 PM

    Cold water applied. Thank you.

  5. kremis says: Jul 15, 2011 11:22 PM

    The only news worse would be that brett” I throw interceptions at the worst time” farve is coming out of retirement

  6. footballfanatic3431 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:22 PM

    You have got to be kidding.

    Even on the most positive, optimistic news day in CBA negotiations history, there is still cold water.

    Un-Freaking-Believable.

  7. silverhornet says: Jul 15, 2011 11:24 PM

    Here’s hoping Kessler and Quinn get sent to the moon for as long as it takes.

  8. joesphkerr says: Jul 15, 2011 11:25 PM

    I knew this was coming. Get rid of Jeffrey Kessler and the deal will get done. Hopefully when the next CBA is up, Kessler won’t be involved.

  9. crunation says: Jul 15, 2011 11:27 PM

    Sign it in blood

  10. the4cannon's says: Jul 15, 2011 11:27 PM

    From full on erect to limp noodle in no time flat!

  11. tbbucs09 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:27 PM

    LAWYERS SUCK

  12. typhilly21 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:28 PM

    No worries here, quit trying to drive hits for bs.

  13. trbowman says: Jul 15, 2011 11:30 PM

    If Kessler or Quinn were to blow up the talks, they cement themselves as two of the most hated people in the country.

  14. austinbrownsfan says: Jul 15, 2011 11:30 PM

    These reports are like football heroin…

  15. skoobyfl says: Jul 15, 2011 11:30 PM

    Romans versus the lawyers is next.

  16. nomesayin says: Jul 15, 2011 11:30 PM

    Hurry up & get it signed, before they find the passage back to the place they were before.

    Relax, said the lawyers. We are programmed to deceive. They can sign it anytime they like. But we will never leave…

  17. jjrs89 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:32 PM

    Durrrr, hotel California, durrr

  18. melonnhead says: Jul 15, 2011 11:36 PM

    oh come on i dont think james harrison can take anymore downtime!

  19. dylanmusicfane says: Jul 15, 2011 11:36 PM

    is that as cold as the water gets tonight? kill the beast… i love that!

  20. oldbrowndawg says: Jul 15, 2011 11:37 PM

    This is progressing from the ridiculous to the sublime! I’m checking out of this moronic nonsense until I hear officially that the CBA is agreed to. Enough already!

  21. possiblecabbage says: Jul 15, 2011 11:43 PM

    I honestly feel better now that I know what the horrible setback might look like. The completely unanticipated horrible setback was much scarier.

  22. tashkalucy says: Jul 15, 2011 11:46 PM

    You mean we don’t have to talk about the Lebron James circus and the rest of the WWF-inspired NBA?

    We can follow a real professional sports league!

    Oh, goody goody!

  23. pmars64 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:46 PM

    If the owners can find a way to squeeze more out of this deal in the 11th, by God, they will if they think it won’t destroy the deal. There are ALWAYS 11th hour hiccups. Anybody who has been a part of any difficult and arduous negotiation knows that something ALWAYS comes up before signitures are put on paper.

  24. tomsd1 says: Jul 15, 2011 11:48 PM

    Never in the history of sports – at least as far as I can recall – and I only go back 60 plus years – has there been more hype/scrambling for headlines/pure manufactured BS than what we have seen/read/heard wrt to the negotiations for a new NFL CBA – aka – lockout/strike.

    So far – the Owners have accomplished one of their major goals – to get these negotiations out of the courts (specifically – the Federal District Courts in Minnesota) – and into the bargaining room and/or before the proper authority – the NLRB – National Labor Relations Board – which the Norris-LeGuardia Act compels.

    Once the 8th Ct of Appeals squashed rookie Judge Suzy’s completely out to lunch 89 page “decision” – the NFLPA has hopefully awakened and spit out the kool-aid that D Finger Smith was providing them about achieving their goals through the courts.

    Right now – the owners are toying with the Union and their much ballyhooed executive committee – (Drew – the mouth – Brees at the forefront) and the only real decision the owners are considering is:

    How much face do we – the owners – let them – the players – keep face – v. just breaking their backs.

  25. nonstory says: Jul 15, 2011 11:48 PM

    We tod did, sofa king we tod did.

  26. realitypolice says: Jul 15, 2011 11:57 PM

    greatminnesotasportsmind says:
    Jul 15, 2011 11:18 PM
    Damn lawyers trying to “earn” that extra buck.
    ===================

    You do understand that this article isn’t based upon anything the lawyers have actually done, right? Only speculation on something that they could theoretically, possibly, hypothetically, not likely but just might try?

    This article contains no facts, just pure speculation that one of the two sides might try to do something again that they may or may not have done before, despite having no evidence whatsoever that either is planning any like it.

    Probably the most pandering, worthless article posted throughout this entire lockout nightmare.

  27. wtfru2 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:00 AM

    Any work thought the weekend, or they all heading home again? I’m really getting sick of this $hit.

  28. mrsh1978 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:04 AM

    You’re such the party crasher….

  29. tumtum1288 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:05 AM

    Nice hotel California reference.

  30. trbowman says: Jul 16, 2011 12:07 AM

    Besides, the owners already know the players aren’t giving more ground. They saw what happened the first time. They’re not going to try it again.

    Wouldn’t trust Kessler/Quinn as far as I could throw them. Still, I highly doubt they try to blow it up at this point.

    I wouldn’t worry about this.

  31. adeedothatswho says: Jul 16, 2011 12:11 AM

    Come on….the best part of that stupid song is the Steely Dan reference….

  32. 305phinphan says: Jul 16, 2011 12:16 AM

    If those lawyers mess up all of this progress that has been made, they will be more hated then Casey Anthony is right now!

  33. jshawaii22 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:19 AM

    Welcome to the Hotel NFL… where we are all prisoner’s of our own device…

    I need my fix…. my NFL fix…

    js

  34. ninerfaithful75 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:21 AM

    I’m digging the Eagles references, and not like the Demaurice Smith dig, I actually like em

  35. jayniner says: Jul 16, 2011 12:29 AM

    What’s the difference between a dead lawyer in the road and a dead snake in the road?…There’re skid marks in front of the snake…

  36. southmo says: Jul 16, 2011 12:33 AM

    Hard to imagine that either side is stupid enough to go through this many hours of negotiations, and achieve this much progress to now scuttle the deal over ANY single issue.

    Talk about a public relations disaster…

    Nah, they’ll make it. Might have a last minute argument but they’ll get it done soon.

  37. hongkongfan says: Jul 16, 2011 12:36 AM

    Props for the ‘Eagles/Hotel California’ reference.

  38. bearsnoah says: Jul 16, 2011 12:37 AM

    Click “like” if you are aware that this entire lockout is a giant publicity pageant for the NFL.

    An essentially pre-ordained dispute that was along going to end on a specific day right in time for the season….but guess what…the ratings will be ALLTIME HIGH this fall.

    Anticipation sells. We’ve all eaten it up–just be aware that were the puppets here.

  39. surftx says: Jul 16, 2011 12:40 AM

    Not so much as here or here, but right here…..

  40. illusi0nz79 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:43 AM

    Officially done with all articles related to the lockout until it’s 100% been resolved.

    Don’t care, moving on, nothing to see here. Thanks for trying to keep us informed PFT but it’s gotten quite stale.

    I’ll stick to the other articles until I see one that says it’s done and what date things attempt to go back to normal.

  41. golions1 says: Jul 16, 2011 12:46 AM

    As long as they just keeping stabbing with their steely knives……

    Nice Eagles reference at the end of the article.

  42. wyldsoul says: Jul 16, 2011 12:56 AM

    aka…
    The lockout will be over in 4 days. or the lockout will linger on into the unforseable future. or we have no realistic idea of when football will resume and should reserve judgement until we have our facts strait.

  43. rolandsloan says: Jul 16, 2011 1:16 AM

    “Mildly concerned”……Words uttered on the Titanic five minutes after it hit the iceburg. It ain’t over til it’s over.

  44. gregwestlake says: Jul 16, 2011 1:19 AM

    Why did you even write this article tonight? Couldn’t you have let us have this one day of happiness….

  45. pacificnw7722 says: Jul 16, 2011 1:23 AM

    “Jeffrey Kessler and/or Jim Quinn will make a Hail Mary effort to blow up the talks.”

    Keep these demons away from the talks!

  46. patriotsdefense says: Jul 16, 2011 1:28 AM

    Red Hot Chili Peppers = Super Bowl Halftime?

  47. raiduhdude says: Jul 16, 2011 1:28 AM

    Please don’t screw the pooch.

  48. tradeassociation says: Jul 16, 2011 1:41 AM

    Ownership has no reason for a bait-and-switch. The next scheduled owners’ meeting is July 21 (Thursday), and if there is no deal in principle by then to vote on, then there will be no way to avoid missing regular season games, which would cost the owners hundreds of millions of dollars.

    This labor standoff proves that the owners aren’t losing money. If they were, they’d be willing to take a short term financial hit in order to secure a fundamentally better deal. But the truth is that they weren’t even willing to sacrifice more than one preseason game, let alone, say, a half season. They were making plenty of money, and wanted a better deal in order to make even more. So, they were willing to endure a lockout and miss an offseason in order to try to make a little more. And they wanted to be able to tell Mike Brown/Ralph Wilson contingent “hey, we tried! … well not really but hey we can at least SAY we tried, ok?”

    In a lot of ways, this deal is better for the players – and worse for certain owners – than the last one. If the owners actually were hurting financially (and by this I mean collectively; some individual owners might legitimately have money issues), they would have never agreed to this deal, and certainly would have never agreed to it so quickly, after less than a month of actual negotiations. They wouldn’t have agreed to do more things to generate revenue (i.e. getting a team back in Los Angeles) and they CERTAINLY wouldn’t agree to a 10 year deal. And if the owners were oh so struggling to stay afloat, why on earth would they agree not only to large salary cap increases, but to significantly increase their minimum payroll each year? Even the rookie cap keeps teams from counting the prorated rookie signing bonuses towards the salary cap floor, which means that the rookie cap will result in teams paying more money to more players!

    Now you see why they wouldn’t open the books. The owners are making plenty of money, so they have absolutely no incentive to cost themselves hundreds of millions of dollars by missing regular season games.

  49. festivus01 says: Jul 16, 2011 1:41 AM

    Oh wow…………………

  50. woodyg says: Jul 16, 2011 1:52 AM

    Talk about paranoid !!!

  51. saturn1111 says: Jul 16, 2011 2:28 AM

    “And as one member of the media pointed out earlier tonight, another bait-and-switch by ownership could cause a major problem between the parties.”

    Well…sure. So could an out-of-the blue decision by either side not to sign the new cba cause problems. So could dropping a bomb on the hotel conference room where they’re doing the negotiating.

    But are there any actual *signs* that the owners are poised to make a bait-and-switch move? If there aren’t, then why bring it up?

    The first concern you raise, that NFLPA* lawyers have been playing rope-a-dope, and might blow this thing up yet, is understandable, because the owners are concerned that something like this might be on the horizon.

  52. donniebmc says: Jul 16, 2011 4:35 AM

    If they don’t get it done, I think I’M gonna ‘blow up’

  53. avaughn02 says: Jul 16, 2011 5:12 AM

    true, but as others have reported d smith may have finally stepped in an told nflpa lawyers to quit it like upshaw had done in the past. deal is imminent hof game may be cancelled but season should be on sched. let the crazy free agency begin!! pullin out fantasy draft boards soon

  54. saints25 says: Jul 16, 2011 6:26 AM

    soooo,thats why Jerry Jones stayed in NYC?

  55. stubbyjones says: Jul 16, 2011 6:38 AM

    Just drink the champagne already…things seem better when youre blitzed….

  56. deeppurple23 says: Jul 16, 2011 6:43 AM

    JOHN not Herbie.

  57. purpleman527 says: Jul 16, 2011 6:56 AM

    Well, that’s more like it.

    I was starting to have withdrawl systems from the drug known as deal/no deal.

    Thanks for giving us another shot of deal/no deal.

  58. imag3d says: Jul 16, 2011 7:08 AM

    I thought the water was getting a bit too warm around here…. yeah that little bit of cold water makes it feel just about right ;)

  59. dewalt2990 says: Jul 16, 2011 7:16 AM

    Just play Prevent on those POS lawyers. Let em dink and dunk until their time runs out.

  60. jersey73 says: Jul 16, 2011 7:20 AM

    So in essence, you are worried about what we all have known for years. LAWYERS SCREW EVERYTHING UP!!!

  61. baddegg says: Jul 16, 2011 7:22 AM

    You couldn’t resist…lol

  62. jimmysee says: Jul 16, 2011 7:24 AM

    Is the insanity clause still there?

  63. warmachine2112 says: Jul 16, 2011 7:25 AM

    From the outset, Jeffrey Kessler has made me feel nervous about his commitment to a negotiated conclusion to this situation.

    Obviously, given that he’s currently a Global Litigation Chair, that would be the recourse with which he is most familiar. There’s the old maxim about the right tool for the job to be considered and while he is a tool, he was not necessarily the correct tool.

    The sooner this is signed and done with, the sooner I’ll be able to relax and not have to deal with seeing Kessler’s “just-released-a-massive-fart” smile on TV.

  64. any2many says: Jul 16, 2011 7:26 AM

    Don’t tell me about the labor pains , just show me the baby !

  65. txhc says: Jul 16, 2011 7:41 AM

    I KNEW THE COLD WATER WAS COMING!

  66. oldbyrd says: Jul 16, 2011 7:45 AM

    D Moron Smith dragging it out? Of course it’s back to the zoo for him after this abortion.

  67. gdonz14 says: Jul 16, 2011 7:46 AM

    STOP!!! No more posts til it’s done!! PFT style of lockout spin reporting as per exhibit A below: “it’s done!”…”maybe not”…”it’s done!”…”maybe not”. No one cares until there’s actual news to report. It’s maddening and insulting. PFT = PuppetFootballTalk.com.

    7/15, 11:14pm — There’s still a minor reason to be mildly concerned
    7/15, 7:10pm — Almost nothing can derail a deal now
    7/15, 9:33am — Get ready for a road bump or two
    7/14, 11:54pm — Talks end for the day with a deal closer than ever

  68. robf2010 says: Jul 16, 2011 7:54 AM

    I have an idea. Sign the deal NOW before anyone has a chance to blow it up.

  69. jersey73 says: Jul 16, 2011 8:23 AM

    When there are hours to be billed, never count out a lawyer!!!

    BILLABLE HOURS…LIKE CRACK TO AN ATTORNEY!

  70. dolphins1121 says: Jul 16, 2011 8:41 AM

    What a pointless article…

  71. hankster81 says: Jul 16, 2011 9:08 AM

    Nice Eagles quote. This is what lawyers do. They stall, stall and stall so they can keep racking up those billable hours. We just went through a very simple lawsuit and it took two years. Should have been about 6 months, but the lawyers (not ours) kept stalling. Even our lawyer expressed disgust for the practice of law based on what he says happens every time – they stall to collect more money from their deep pocket clients.

  72. glac1 says: Jul 16, 2011 9:35 AM

    There’s a union involved so all bets are off. They can NOT be trusted.

  73. deadmanwalking47 says: Jul 16, 2011 9:47 AM

    only thing lower than eagle fans and those who think pit bulls are a worthless breed? LAWYERS!!!!

  74. kate773 says: Jul 16, 2011 10:16 AM

    Forgive me for asking what I’m sure is a stupid question, but why would ANYONE, including the lawyers, purposely try to blow up the deal? That doesn’t make sense to me.

  75. steelers4385 says: Jul 16, 2011 10:23 AM

    I wonder if lawyers are required to sell their souls to the devil before actually becoming a lawyer?

  76. jcd213 says: Jul 16, 2011 10:32 AM

    loser journalists!

  77. gdeli says: Jul 16, 2011 10:39 AM

    Well they aren’t giving each other roses! git it done!

  78. CKL says: Jul 16, 2011 11:48 AM

    @tradeassociation

    Nice post with good reasoning even though I don’t agree with the argument that the owners weren’t “losing money”. I don’t think any of them claimed they were actually losing money (as in “in the red”)…just that their profit margins were declining due to increasing expenses. Maybe that’s what you meant with that phrase though and if so, please ignore this. :)

    We shall see if the owners and players have negotiated something that addresses the profit margins the owners are making. I am not sure what happened to make them dump the “true up” piece of the bargaining with the mine off the top for owner expenses, but the conversion to a flat revenue split from those methods seems to suggest that the owners and players concerns were addressed better that way.

  79. 3ghostninja says: Jul 16, 2011 12:56 PM

    Damn lawyers trying to “earn” that extra buck.
    ===================

    You do understand that this article isn’t based upon anything the lawyers have actually done, right? Only speculation on something that they could theoretically, possibly, hypothetically, not likely but just might try?

    This article contains no facts, just pure speculation that one of the two sides might try to do something again that they may or may not have done before, despite having no evidence whatsoever that either is planning any like it.

    Probably the most pandering, worthless article posted throughout this entire lockout nightmare.

    ===================================

    It’s just that it’s possible. There’s motive and opportunity for the lawyers, so to speak, and they wouldn’t mind making an extra several hundred thousand dollars.

    Businesses always deny something, even if they were planning it, until they announce the decision themselves.

    My attitude is “they’d better not.” But what am I going to do about it?

    I wouldn’t call the article worthless though. I think it’s just trying to add a little bit of caution to all the optimism — trying to keep things real until the deal is actually signed.

  80. thefiesty1 says: Jul 16, 2011 2:58 PM

    Quinn/Keesler won’t make a move until DeMo says jump. They are not the problem, DeMo is and he’s the one everybody needs to worry about screwing this thing up.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!