<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opt out clause still lingers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:45:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfatl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1142452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pfatl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1142452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@narutofan10

Are you that stupid?  YES.  I am saying there is a negative side to making 48% of 25 billion over 10 years. First, 25 billion over 10 years?  WTF is wrong with your math skills?  Assuming that the 9 billion number (per year) that&#039;s thrown around, even if the pie doesnt grow, we&#039;re talking 90 billion over 10 years.  Second, this deal is made given that the pie is composed of specific revenue streams.  The players are making assumptions about what the total revenue streams are from which they take 48%.  The owners thus have every incentive to try to find new revenue streams not within the deal.  While there is nothing wrong with that, there is something wrong if the owners divert efforts to maximize revenues under the deal to seeking revenues outside the deal.  

Thus, the players could get screwed and want an opt-out provision.  Again, like i said, i didnt approve of the owners pulling the plug and I dont approve of the players holding out for the ability to do so.  Your stupid comment does help me to understand the basis of many people&#039;s animosity against the players generally - they just don&#039;t understand anything that&#039;s going on.

Also, you probably don&#039;t understand why the owners opted out of the CBA.  YOU MEAN THERE&#039;S A DOWNSIDE TO THE OWNERS MAKING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS??! idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@narutofan10</p>
<p>Are you that stupid?  YES.  I am saying there is a negative side to making 48% of 25 billion over 10 years. First, 25 billion over 10 years?  WTF is wrong with your math skills?  Assuming that the 9 billion number (per year) that&#8217;s thrown around, even if the pie doesnt grow, we&#8217;re talking 90 billion over 10 years.  Second, this deal is made given that the pie is composed of specific revenue streams.  The players are making assumptions about what the total revenue streams are from which they take 48%.  The owners thus have every incentive to try to find new revenue streams not within the deal.  While there is nothing wrong with that, there is something wrong if the owners divert efforts to maximize revenues under the deal to seeking revenues outside the deal.  </p>
<p>Thus, the players could get screwed and want an opt-out provision.  Again, like i said, i didnt approve of the owners pulling the plug and I dont approve of the players holding out for the ability to do so.  Your stupid comment does help me to understand the basis of many people&#8217;s animosity against the players generally &#8211; they just don&#8217;t understand anything that&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Also, you probably don&#8217;t understand why the owners opted out of the CBA.  YOU MEAN THERE&#8217;S A DOWNSIDE TO THE OWNERS MAKING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS??! idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damnyankee13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damnyankee13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[cancel the season allready]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cancel the season allready</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucngator</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucngator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 02:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the NFLPA* and the league broke negotiations with the understanding that &quot;they had a deal&quot;....

How are the players allowed to continue to negotiate ANYTHING??  

Looks to me, like the players are the one&#039;s &quot;slipping things in&quot;...

...STFU and sign the damn deal, you ungrateful and arrogant pricks!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the NFLPA* and the league broke negotiations with the understanding that &#8220;they had a deal&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
<p>How are the players allowed to continue to negotiate ANYTHING??  </p>
<p>Looks to me, like the players are the one&#8217;s &#8220;slipping things in&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;STFU and sign the damn deal, you ungrateful and arrogant pricks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shawnleblancpatsfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shawnleblancpatsfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason I can think off where players would want to opt out after 7 years is the case where owners in 2013 could reduce the pre-season from 4 to 2 games.  Assuming the players don&#039;t agree to the extension of the regular season to 18 games, the salary cap would be reduced due to the reduction in total pre-season revenue.  I know this would be a few years after (2017 season) but it gives them an opportunity to opt out to force to re-negotiate the revenue sharing to get a bigger piece of teh pice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I can think off where players would want to opt out after 7 years is the case where owners in 2013 could reduce the pre-season from 4 to 2 games.  Assuming the players don&#8217;t agree to the extension of the regular season to 18 games, the salary cap would be reduced due to the reduction in total pre-season revenue.  I know this would be a few years after (2017 season) but it gives them an opportunity to opt out to force to re-negotiate the revenue sharing to get a bigger piece of teh pice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: narutofan10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[narutofan10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 22:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pfatl says: Jul 24, 2011 2:38 PM

The players want it because the owners demonstrated that no one makes a huge deal of/holds it against the party who pulls the plug.


So the players are sitting there thinking, we’re rolling the dice with this 48% deal. If it doesn’t work out the way we’re expecting, we may want out of this.

-------------------------------------------------

wait hold up are you saying there is a negative side to getting 48% of 25 BILLION DOLLARS over the next ten years...a good 10% more than any other business will give you...WTF...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pfatl says: Jul 24, 2011 2:38 PM</p>
<p>The players want it because the owners demonstrated that no one makes a huge deal of/holds it against the party who pulls the plug.</p>
<p>So the players are sitting there thinking, we’re rolling the dice with this 48% deal. If it doesn’t work out the way we’re expecting, we may want out of this.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>wait hold up are you saying there is a negative side to getting 48% of 25 BILLION DOLLARS over the next ten years&#8230;a good 10% more than any other business will give you&#8230;WTF&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mhs8031</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mhs8031]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posts concerning criticisms of the content on this site are screened.  When say something like, &quot;When you speculate that the deal contains no escape clause and then post articles where there will be one&quot;  I think the powers that be are simply sensationalizing the news and even rumors to get more hits on the site.  If this is posted, I will be surprised]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posts concerning criticisms of the content on this site are screened.  When say something like, &#8220;When you speculate that the deal contains no escape clause and then post articles where there will be one&#8221;  I think the powers that be are simply sensationalizing the news and even rumors to get more hits on the site.  If this is posted, I will be surprised</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefiesty1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thefiesty1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An addendum can be added to the CBA for the greedy players for an opt out.  The owners will be agreeable when they find out in 7 years how much they gave away to the pimp and his decertified union.  They can opt out again and start this ridiculus process again.

They are all a bunch of idiots trying to screw up the best thing going.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An addendum can be added to the CBA for the greedy players for an opt out.  The owners will be agreeable when they find out in 7 years how much they gave away to the pimp and his decertified union.  They can opt out again and start this ridiculus process again.</p>
<p>They are all a bunch of idiots trying to screw up the best thing going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdemay4</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141727</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mdemay4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fans should boycott all preseason games,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fans should boycott all preseason games,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uclabruininstlouis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uclabruininstlouis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, it&#039;ll be so much fun to insult each other again about our teams than listen to this esoteric BS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;ll be so much fun to insult each other again about our teams than listen to this esoteric BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: palinforpresidentofnorthkorea</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[palinforpresidentofnorthkorea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More money!

Less practice!

Less hitting!

Less tackling!

VJ lying to the fans!

The NFLPA**** is ruining the game.  Shame on them!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More money!</p>
<p>Less practice!</p>
<p>Less hitting!</p>
<p>Less tackling!</p>
<p>VJ lying to the fans!</p>
<p>The NFLPA**** is ruining the game.  Shame on them!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: istateyourname</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[istateyourname]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...not underestimate the value of a 10-year deal to the important process of mending fences with the fans.&quot;

Ha,ha,ha, you&#039;re so funny.  Fans, what fans?
They were going to go with free parking, but that got tabled.  Try as hard as he might, the owners did not go for Demaurice&#039;s proposal to cap the cost of a beer at $4.25.
Hold on there, we&#039;re not just going to sign it, the fans want us to read it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;not underestimate the value of a 10-year deal to the important process of mending fences with the fans.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ha,ha,ha, you&#8217;re so funny.  Fans, what fans?<br />
They were going to go with free parking, but that got tabled.  Try as hard as he might, the owners did not go for Demaurice&#8217;s proposal to cap the cost of a beer at $4.25.<br />
Hold on there, we&#8217;re not just going to sign it, the fans want us to read it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eagleswin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eagleswin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really think the lack of practices as set forth in the new CBA could be a problem.  The reason most injuries happen in practice is because players are on the field more during practices than games.  Once it changes to more injuries happening in games (esp. injuries which could&#039;ve been avoided by being in better condition) people will lament the lack of practice time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think the lack of practices as set forth in the new CBA could be a problem.  The reason most injuries happen in practice is because players are on the field more during practices than games.  Once it changes to more injuries happening in games (esp. injuries which could&#8217;ve been avoided by being in better condition) people will lament the lack of practice time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marty2019</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marty2019]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 20:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If there’s any legitimate reason to have the ability to pull the plug after 10 years, we’d love to hear it.&quot;

I think you mean &quot;after 7 years.&quot;   Not &quot;after 10 years.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If there’s any legitimate reason to have the ability to pull the plug after 10 years, we’d love to hear it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you mean &#8220;after 7 years.&#8221;   Not &#8220;after 10 years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hedleykow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hedleykow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At some point you have to face the reality that it&#039;s just too darn hot to practice football right now.  How much intelligence does it take to figure that out?  Once the outdoors temperatures settle down a bit, then it will be time to do the deal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point you have to face the reality that it&#8217;s just too darn hot to practice football right now.  How much intelligence does it take to figure that out?  Once the outdoors temperatures settle down a bit, then it will be time to do the deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valman61</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[valman61]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as I hate this lockout and believe it should be over by now, I understand the opt out for players. The points against it made by this site are all valid, but my argument comes from new avenues of revenue not included in this CBA as football income. With digital media and technological advances, there may be new ways teams start making large sums of money that are not collectively bargained which they decide to keep. They have final control of the books and will have no incentive to share anything above and beyond what is included in the agreement for 10 years. If their is an opt out clause, it may give owners incentive to share a portion of any large new revenue which is not currently included in the new CBA in the hopes of avoiding more labor uncertainty and lowering tv money and other revenue directly impacted by long term labor certainty.

 In my opinion, you can solve this with a broad definition of revenue, an independent firm reviewing the revenues, and the parties agreeing to meet and review all revenues to make sure both sides are getting a fair amount. I obviously haven&#039;t seen the new CBA, but I know historically new revenues which one side believes should not be shared while the other does generally creates labor unrest. An opt out can be used as leverage over the course of the deal for players. I don&#039;t agree with it necessarily, but I do understand it. PFT please try to look into the CBA and see if their is a mechanism which designates either sharing or a review system of determination for new revenue streams which are earned beyond the scope of this agreement and if they will be included in the 48% of revenue sharing. 

If this agreement shares all revenue, my point is null and void. However I doubt it includes all revenues because teams generate revenue from other avenues like concerts in the stadium, interest, tax savings, and etc which typically are not classified as football operating revenue. It all hinges on the scope of the revenue which is shared and which revenues would not be included in that scope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I hate this lockout and believe it should be over by now, I understand the opt out for players. The points against it made by this site are all valid, but my argument comes from new avenues of revenue not included in this CBA as football income. With digital media and technological advances, there may be new ways teams start making large sums of money that are not collectively bargained which they decide to keep. They have final control of the books and will have no incentive to share anything above and beyond what is included in the agreement for 10 years. If their is an opt out clause, it may give owners incentive to share a portion of any large new revenue which is not currently included in the new CBA in the hopes of avoiding more labor uncertainty and lowering tv money and other revenue directly impacted by long term labor certainty.</p>
<p> In my opinion, you can solve this with a broad definition of revenue, an independent firm reviewing the revenues, and the parties agreeing to meet and review all revenues to make sure both sides are getting a fair amount. I obviously haven&#8217;t seen the new CBA, but I know historically new revenues which one side believes should not be shared while the other does generally creates labor unrest. An opt out can be used as leverage over the course of the deal for players. I don&#8217;t agree with it necessarily, but I do understand it. PFT please try to look into the CBA and see if their is a mechanism which designates either sharing or a review system of determination for new revenue streams which are earned beyond the scope of this agreement and if they will be included in the 48% of revenue sharing. </p>
<p>If this agreement shares all revenue, my point is null and void. However I doubt it includes all revenues because teams generate revenue from other avenues like concerts in the stadium, interest, tax savings, and etc which typically are not classified as football operating revenue. It all hinges on the scope of the revenue which is shared and which revenues would not be included in that scope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zizzod</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zizzod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the &quot;sources&quot; know NOTHING!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the &#8220;sources&#8221; know NOTHING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t wait to see the details of this deal because what I have seen suggests that the players bent the owners over prison style.
/stillangryaboutthewussificationofpracticething]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see the details of this deal because what I have seen suggests that the players bent the owners over prison style.<br />
/stillangryaboutthewussificationofpracticething</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j0esixpack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j0esixpack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 years = stability = more money for all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 years = stability = more money for all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spencer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll remember this for tomorrow, when there&#039;s no vote and another delay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll remember this for tomorrow, when there&#8217;s no vote and another delay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evrybdyhas1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evrybdyhas1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The opt out clause in the last CBA was the lever that allowed Gene Upshaw to force it down the owners throats. Both sides should learn from the past and be either all in or all out. 
The fans don&#039;t want anymore of this BS.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opt out clause in the last CBA was the lever that allowed Gene Upshaw to force it down the owners throats. Both sides should learn from the past and be either all in or all out.<br />
The fans don&#8217;t want anymore of this BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverhornet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverhornet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So tired... so so tired...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So tired&#8230; so so tired&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chatham10</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chatham10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will hear about this &quot;lockout&quot; all year even after this type of thing is settled and the new CBA is signed and the reason we will keep hearing about it is when a team plays bad it will be blamed on the lockout. I look forward to next year when after the players got everything they wanted, less OTA&#039;s, lesss practice time, no two a days and then see what new excuse they will have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will hear about this &#8220;lockout&#8221; all year even after this type of thing is settled and the new CBA is signed and the reason we will keep hearing about it is when a team plays bad it will be blamed on the lockout. I look forward to next year when after the players got everything they wanted, less OTA&#8217;s, lesss practice time, no two a days and then see what new excuse they will have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caseysarasota</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[caseysarasota]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[apparently so does Brett Favre.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently so does Brett Favre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjp2033</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tjp2033]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 19:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What dont these players understand?  Longer CBA without a threat of an opt out means more money in tv deals.  Which in turn means more money for the players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What dont these players understand?  Longer CBA without a threat of an opt out means more money in tv deals.  Which in turn means more money for the players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everydayimfumbilin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[everydayimfumbilin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are just messing with us now]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are just messing with us now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mook68</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mook68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This just won&#039;t end.  Y ou don&#039;t have to worry about this stuff in the WWE.....lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just won&#8217;t end.  Y ou don&#8217;t have to worry about this stuff in the WWE&#8230;..lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rams2011</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141638</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rams2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thursdays headlines:  week 1 of the preseason cancelled   another week of (close) and  (crossing Ts and dotting Is) then next thursdays headlines week 2 of the preseason cancelled, then more assorted bullcrap.  etc   etc   etc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thursdays headlines:  week 1 of the preseason cancelled   another week of (close) and  (crossing Ts and dotting Is) then next thursdays headlines week 2 of the preseason cancelled, then more assorted bullcrap.  etc   etc   etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heroofthisparish</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141635</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heroofthisparish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has had cold water thrown on it so often it may as well be water boarding.

Get it done already!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has had cold water thrown on it so often it may as well be water boarding.</p>
<p>Get it done already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mictins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mictins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There it is..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There it is..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfatl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/24/opt-out-clause-still-lingers/#comment-1141629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pfatl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=141183#comment-1141629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The players want it because the owners demonstrated that no one makes a huge deal of/holds it against the party who pulls the plug.

This time around, the owners pulled the plug and yet a huge proportion of the readers of this site either conveniently forget or don&#039;t care.  The owners basically said, &quot;jeez, this labor deal isn&#039;t working out how we thought, lets pull the plug and try again.&quot;

So the players are sitting there thinking, we&#039;re rolling the dice with this 48% deal.  If it doesn&#039;t work out the way we&#039;re expecting, we may want out of this.

I didn&#039;t approve of the owners doing it and don&#039;t approve of the players holding out for the provision.  

Sleep in the bed you make.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The players want it because the owners demonstrated that no one makes a huge deal of/holds it against the party who pulls the plug.</p>
<p>This time around, the owners pulled the plug and yet a huge proportion of the readers of this site either conveniently forget or don&#8217;t care.  The owners basically said, &#8220;jeez, this labor deal isn&#8217;t working out how we thought, lets pull the plug and try again.&#8221;</p>
<p>So the players are sitting there thinking, we&#8217;re rolling the dice with this 48% deal.  If it doesn&#8217;t work out the way we&#8217;re expecting, we may want out of this.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t approve of the owners doing it and don&#8217;t approve of the players holding out for the provision.  </p>
<p>Sleep in the bed you make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
