Skip to content

NFLPA keeping close watch on cuts of player reps and alternates

Getty Images

As the NFL continues its frenetic pace of signings and releases, some of the players who have been released have played significant roles in the recently-concluded labor effort.

A source with knowledge of the situation, but who has requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the subject, tells PFT that the NFLPA will be monitoring “with vigilance” any decisions to cut player representatives and alternate player representatives.

Since Tuesday, three players fit that category.  Receiver Derrick Mason (pictured) was the Ravens’ representative, and center Shaun O’Hara was the Giants’ rep.  Tackle Max Starks served as the alternate in Pittsburgh.

Whether the NFLPA can prove retaliation is a much bigger, and more convoluted question.  For now, the message to every team is that the soon-to-be-reconstituted union wants to be sure that none of the men who led the effort on behalf of all players lose their jobs because of it.

Permalink 41 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Baltimore Ravens, New York Giants, Pittsburgh Steelers, Rumor Mill, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
41 Responses to “NFLPA keeping close watch on cuts of player reps and alternates”
  1. bigvinnyinjax says: Jul 28, 2011 2:46 PM

    Cut all 32

  2. jersey73 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:46 PM

    Tin foil hats ready for the NFLPA*???

  3. orakpownd says: Jul 28, 2011 2:46 PM

    Have the players ever considered they are cut…because they cant play football.

  4. bigvinnyinjax says: Jul 28, 2011 2:46 PM

    …or however many there may be.

  5. broncobeta says: Jul 28, 2011 2:48 PM


    Derrick Mason sucks.

    Shaun O’Hara was always hurt.

    Max Starks was a form of punishment for Big Ben.

  6. dcbassguy says: Jul 28, 2011 2:50 PM

    The union* needs to relax. The guys that got cut were getting paid too much, for doing too little. The O’hara cut shocked me, but that was more because he is Coughlins son-in-law. I still think he’ll be back with the Giants.

  7. amuzed2dth says: Jul 28, 2011 2:52 PM

    This smells funny. Please do the vigilance.

    Wonder if Mason would be willing to replace Kenny Britt?

  8. trbowman says: Jul 28, 2011 2:52 PM


    Mason will likely be brought back at a lower price. Gee, think Starks getting cut might of had something to do with him pushing 400 pounds?

    NFLPA doesn’t have a case.

  9. rolltide510 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:52 PM

    It would seem a lot easier to prove this if all of the players in question weren’t members of the AARP in addition to the NFLPA.

  10. waldoampere says: Jul 28, 2011 2:53 PM

    I can’t imagine that any owner in his right mind would hurt his team by telingl a coach to cut a productive player because he was active for the NFLPA. OK, Mike Brown would but I mean owners who are rational.

  11. waitingguilty says: Jul 28, 2011 2:53 PM

    At the risk of sounding naive, this patently absurd.

    It stands to reason that a player rep would be a more experienced, maybe even one of the most experienced (IE Old) players on a given team. So logically they are going to be at risk of being cut as most teams constantly value getting younger.

  12. austinbrownsfan says: Jul 28, 2011 2:53 PM

    Please, by all that is good and wholesome in this world. No more stories or references to the devilish lockout.

  13. psuravens19 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:54 PM

    Dam… now the Ravens can’t cut Foxworth and make a strong push for Nnamdi.

  14. possiblecabbage says: Jul 28, 2011 2:54 PM

    I find it really hard to believe that an NFL team would act counter to its self-interest and cut a guy simply because he was part of the union leadership. If a guy is a good player, and he doesn’t make trouble for you in the locker room then you keep him.

    It’s far more likely that some of the NFLPA team reps and alternates just fall into the “old, overpaid, and/or not that good any more” category that is so hard on veterans. I mean, Derrick Mason is 37. A 37 year old WR getting cut should never be a surprise.

  15. hobartbaker says: Jul 28, 2011 2:54 PM

    When the Pats cut Brady we’ll know something’s up.

  16. montsta says: Jul 28, 2011 2:55 PM

    Add Carolina’s kicker John Kasay to that list.

  17. boyshole25 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:56 PM

    ohara is not coughlins son in law chris snee is, coughlin is from my hometown so ive seen snee with him here before

  18. molson48187 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:57 PM

    Exactly, now if the Lions go and cut VBosh then there would be something up but most of these clowns are over the hill and have been spending more time in conference rooms than gyms the last few months.

  19. jakek2 says: Jul 28, 2011 2:58 PM

    All it takes is for one disgruntled team employee to testify that a rep was cut for being a rep.

  20. johnjosephyossarian says: Jul 28, 2011 2:58 PM

    PFT posters prove their stupidity again. The article didn’t claim the union was alleging anything, just that it was monitoring. Jesus, how are you all so dumb?

  21. karlpilkington says: Jul 28, 2011 2:58 PM

    Wow, could it be that the team just does not want the players services anymore and would like to move on? Paranoia will destroya…

  22. polishrod says: Jul 28, 2011 2:58 PM

    Ummm, as a general rule… the player reps are older, established players because who’s gonna vote in a rookie or 2nd year player to represent them.

    Next, let’s add in the concept that player reps NEVER get replaced.

    And finally, their leader is already retired (Mawae).

    So yeah, most player reps are long in the tooth and/or injury prone. Mason and O’Hara both fit that description perfectly

  23. sportsinhd says: Jul 28, 2011 2:59 PM

    Max Starks wasn’t cut as a punishment to Big Ben, he was cut because he currently weighs about 400 pounds. His excessive weight is about equal to his excessive contract.

  24. livenbreathefootball says: Jul 28, 2011 3:03 PM

    It has happened before. We have owners who want to bring things back to the way they were in the ’70s. Guess what happened in the 70’s, no matter how good the player, if he became the NFLPA rep, he was G-O-N-E.

    In prior lawsuits, the same thing happened. The name players were chopped. One of the reasons the players went with Brady, Manning and Brees this time. A little harder to chop them without it being obviously retaliation.

    In other words, yes, the owners will cut players despite any damage to the team.

  25. supashug says: Jul 28, 2011 3:03 PM

    no way to prove it, so stupid

  26. bunjy96 says: Jul 28, 2011 3:04 PM

    dcbassguy says: Jul 28, 2011 2:50 PM

    The union* needs to relax. The guys that got cut were getting paid too much, for doing too little. The O’hara cut shocked me, but that was more because he is Coughlins son-in-law. I still think he’ll be back with the Giants.


    Thought Snee was his son-in-law.

  27. xinellum says: Jul 28, 2011 3:06 PM

    I think the site is negligent in pointing out Mason’s release but not representing the fact the Dominique Foxworth of the Union’s Executive Committee is still on the roater with a huge cap number. If ownership wastruly targeting reps, it is odd they are rewarding the union leaders. The Ravens have a clearcut excuse to axe Foxworth with no repurcussions because of his injury and his cost, yet nothing has happened to him. Sounds to me if you wanted to slay the union beast you woild go for the head not an old toenail that needed cut.

  28. wyobroncoboy says: Jul 28, 2011 3:06 PM

    Then there is Foxworth who never could play.

    He just Talks the talk.

    Great guy…………….intelligent guy……..

  29. mikerlowery says: Jul 28, 2011 3:09 PM

    Vonnie Holliday is next after seeing all the DL moves the ‘Skins are making!

    Player reps are normally the oldest guys (or team leaders). Shouldn’t be a surprise when they get cut.

  30. thehouseofho says: Jul 28, 2011 3:09 PM


    Chris Snee is Coughlin’s son-in-law, not Shaun O’Hara.

  31. mkepackfan says: Jul 28, 2011 3:11 PM

    Dont forget the players committee.

    Kevin Mawae – old…was he even on a roster last season?
    Mark Tauscher – old & beat up from injuries….probably will be cut.

  32. bleedgreen says: Jul 28, 2011 3:13 PM

    dcbassguy says: Jul 28, 2011 2:50 PM

    The union* needs to relax. The guys that got cut were getting paid too much, for doing too little. The O’hara cut shocked me, but that was more because he is Coughlins son-in-law. I still think he’ll be back with the Giants.

    Chris Snee is Coughlin’s son in law, not O’Hara.

  33. falconsfan says: Jul 28, 2011 3:16 PM

    I might have missed something but a majority of the NFLPA player reps were long time Vets. Is it possible that these guys might have just negotiated themselves out of jobs? After all, it is much cheaper for NFL teams to go young now as opposed to signing and keeping Veteran players. Why pay a Derrick Mason a ton of money when AJ Green was just given a 4 year $19 million contract?

  34. eagleswin says: Jul 28, 2011 3:21 PM

    Mawae still believes it’s a conspiracy that he’s not a starting center. It starts at the top and rolls downhill.

  35. jamaltimore says: Jul 28, 2011 3:24 PM

    They shouldn’t complain foxworth still has his job while josh wilson is gone! Foxworth should be cut but I bet the Raven’s hands are tied. He has a bum knee and wasn’t that good before he got hurt!

  36. axespray says: Jul 28, 2011 3:33 PM

    Or it could be that teams want to be “YOUNG” … especially after seeing the Draft & Develope Packers win the superbowl over the Load & Buy Old Free Agents Vikings crumble….

  37. gfan8611 says: Jul 28, 2011 4:08 PM

    O’Hara was cut because he’s an eleven year vet that played in a whopping six games last season and the team protected Manning better without him. He did make the Pro Bowl but all that proves is Pro Bowl voting should be taken away from the fans.

  38. vetdana says: Jul 28, 2011 4:16 PM

    ” Retaliation ” is very difficult to prove, and to do so, Mgmt. would have to be able to document multiple occurrences of what would be considered “offenses”, and then have witnesses to each one. This is a messy and most difficult business.

  39. myeaglescantwin says: Jul 28, 2011 4:21 PM

    Kevin Mawea (spelling)

    perfect case of a NFL player being black balled. Crazy how no one brought that up last year. Multiple teams needed a C last year includin the birds, but no one pickedup a perenial Pro bowler?? cmon.

  40. mark0226 says: Jul 28, 2011 4:30 PM

    Looking at this year alone is not enough. Need to look at the last ten years, which includes periods of no labor unrest and the CBA renewal in 2006.

  41. bcgreg says: Jul 28, 2011 4:45 PM

    Mason’s a 37 year WR.
    Starks was hurt last year and Pitt made it to the SB without him
    O’Hara is 34 years old and was hurt last year.
    There’s no conspiracy here.
    How come Brady, Brees and Manning haven’t been cut? Mankins is signing his one year tender and won’t be cut. Jeff Saturday is still the center for the Colts. Dominique Foxworth hasn’t been cut either.
    Stop with this nonsense NFLPA.
    Plus, the owners locked the players out. They were the ones who wanted to change the deal. The players didn’t strike. What are they retaliating against? That they players didn’t kiss their collective asses?
    Dumb theory here.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!