Comments on: League disapproves four rookie contracts http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/ ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com Wed, 22 May 2013 03:18:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: bowlhounds http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164823 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:51:28 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164823 Dex terrr I dint call everyone haters and while the Steelers are a great team no I’m not a fan . It just gets old listening to the fans (like you apparentlty) who whine because the Pats have kicked your A@@ all over the field for the past decade or so and who can’t ever appreciate what a winning program is.

]]> By: ih8registering http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164734 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:17:47 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164734 RE:

o0omorriso0o says:
Jul 31, 2011 10:38 PM
hahaha so much for the pats being so good in the front office not even knowing any rules or whatever. Eagles have a much better front office!!!

IMO they got three Lombardi’s and my team has none.

]]> By: bozosforall http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164243 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:48:53 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164243 jolink653 says:
Jul 31, 2011 10:48 PM
hmm violation in mallett’s contract must have been the clause about how much weed he’s allowed to smoke

__
Just more proof of what a bust Mallett will be in the NFL.

]]> By: bozosforall http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164231 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:45:32 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164231 CKL says:
Aug 1, 2011 7:56 AM
toad8572 says:
Jul 31, 2011 10:36 PM
Since two of the four voided contracts are with the Pats, I’m guessing it’s because they’re not permitted to appear in the Patriots taping of the opposing team’s offensive signals.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
If you are going to try (and I emphasize TRY) to talk junk about my team, it’s a special brand of failsauce if you can’t even get their violation right.
For your next “attempt” let me remind you that they were never proven to have taped anyone’s practices either, that was McDaniels in Den.
You’re welcome.

__
Goodell’s record fining of the Pats says otherwise. And those tapes that Goodell destroyed were all the proof that he needed. There’s your “proof”, Pats fan moron.

]]> By: lwdj905 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164170 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:04:19 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164170 The Patriots have that clause about charity appearances in all contracts. That is most likely why they got dinged.

]]> By: dexterismyhero http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164129 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:30:38 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164129 @bowlhounds says:
Aug 1, 2011 8:04 AM
Smell the fear and listen to the jealousy from the wanna know what it feels like to actually win in this league fans, incredible.
===================================
smell the fear? Really?

You are starting to sound like a Steelers fan.

Why didn’t just call everyone haters also.

The only thing I smell is an internet tough guy.

Go take a shower.

]]> By: cliverush http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164121 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:21:38 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164121 Nice to see all the losers out there in loserville are already getting their “hate the Pats” comments in. Don’t worry nitwits, your team is probably going nowhere again so you will have plenty of time to figure out more original lines about cheating. Too bad about your team doing nothing to win but with empty headed fans like you behind them they just say “What, me worry” and you return your cow pie grin.

]]> By: bowlhounds http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164101 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:04:10 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164101 Smell the fear and listen to the jealousy from the wanna know what it feels like to actually win in this league fans, incredible.

]]> By: CKL http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164096 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:56:11 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164096 toad8572 says:
Jul 31, 2011 10:36 PM
Since two of the four voided contracts are with the Pats, I’m guessing it’s because they’re not permitted to appear in the Patriots taping of the opposing team’s offensive signals.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
If you are going to try (and I emphasize TRY) to talk junk about my team, it’s a special brand of failsauce if you can’t even get their violation right.
For your next “attempt” let me remind you that they were never proven to have taped anyone’s practices either, that was McDaniels in Den.
You’re welcome.

]]> By: denverdude7 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164033 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:36:17 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164033 What???
The Patriots involved in rule breaking?
No way. Must be some kind of mistake. We all know how squeaky clean they are.

]]> By: patpatriotagain http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1164013 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 07:08:39 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1164013 toad8572 says:

Since two of the four voided contracts are with the Pats, I’m guessing it’s because they’re not permitted to appear in the Patriots taping of the opposing team’s offensive signals.
————————————————
oh you are so funny. you’re a regular Jerry Seinfeld. tell me where do you get such fresh material

]]> By: tomsd1 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163971 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 05:23:53 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163971 Thanks for the good info Mike.

]]> By: jpmelon http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163953 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:51:20 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163953 @goatcheez

You kidding me?

The Pats and Jags f**k up and you think it’s because they’re so smart?

]]> By: deadeye http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163940 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:41:09 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163940 “hahaha so much for the pats being so good in the front office not even knowing any rules or whatever. Eagles have a much better front office!!!”

==============================

Oh really, the Eagles have a better front office? The measure is rings, not rejected rookie contracts.

3 SBs > 0 SBs , sorry, Patriots are better by the only definition that matters.

]]> By: fonetiklee http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163925 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 04:29:55 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163925 o0omorriso0o, you are the reason people think all Eagles fans are morons. Stop making us look bad. We have a very smart FO, but to compare us to a team that won 3 Super Bowls in 4 years is ridiculous. STOP IT.

]]> By: goatcheez http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163822 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:24:50 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163822 If anything this shows how creative these two front offices are. Probably chopping spending by various incentives.

]]> By: drgreenstreak http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163817 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 03:22:20 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163817 Oh, the Pats know the rules….. Now the Jags, believable.

]]> By: whatchutalkinabouthillis http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163791 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:55:30 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163791 Lol @ jolink as long as he doesn’t smoke on gamedays I don’t think BB will care too much.

]]> By: jolink653 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163772 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:48:10 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163772 hmm violation in mallett’s contract must have been the clause about how much weed he’s allowed to smoke

]]> By: whatchutalkinabouthillis http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163761 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:40:23 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163761 Does this happen every year? First time I can remember the league nixing a deal. Please have more transactions NFL! My last few workdays have been awesome bc of all the stuff on PFT (especially bc im an Eagles fan) but it’s been a bit slow recently,

]]> By: o0omorriso0o http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163757 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:38:21 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163757 hahaha so much for the pats being so good in the front office not even knowing any rules or whatever. Eagles have a much better front office!!!

]]> By: toad8572 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/31/league-disapproves-four-rookie-contracts/#comment-1163752 Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:36:07 +0000 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=144048#comment-1163752 Since two of the four voided contracts are with the Pats, I’m guessing it’s because they’re not permitted to appear in the Patriots taping of the opposing team’s offensive signals.

]]>