<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New replay rule shows up in Patriots game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:34:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleedgreen</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bleedgreen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This means that, by default, ALL &quot;close&quot; plays should be called a TD and then reviewed, rather than called not TDs and forcing a coach to challenge. In the Philly/Balt game, there was a close play in the end zone that was called not a touch down, but Reid had to throw the challenge flag to get it looked at. 

Isn&#039;t the point of reviewing every single one to prevent coaches from having to do that? Just like they&#039;re by default not supposed to blow the whistle on a fumble/non-fumble play,  they should be calling these TDs immediately and then following up to make sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This means that, by default, ALL &#8220;close&#8221; plays should be called a TD and then reviewed, rather than called not TDs and forcing a coach to challenge. In the Philly/Balt game, there was a close play in the end zone that was called not a touch down, but Reid had to throw the challenge flag to get it looked at. </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the point of reviewing every single one to prevent coaches from having to do that? Just like they&#8217;re by default not supposed to blow the whistle on a fumble/non-fumble play,  they should be calling these TDs immediately and then following up to make sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucfandango</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucfandango]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a new Replay Czar to oversee all of the replayers, and have they started a new Replayers Union?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a new Replay Czar to oversee all of the replayers, and have they started a new Replayers Union?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akulabug</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akulabug]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The booth guys are right. They are all reviewed just not all will go under the hood. Just because the game is not stopped does not mean it was not looked at by the assistant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The booth guys are right. They are all reviewed just not all will go under the hood. Just because the game is not stopped does not mean it was not looked at by the assistant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjs34</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjs34]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pats are grooming a couple stud QBs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pats are grooming a couple stud QBs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belicheckyoself</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[belicheckyoself]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I liked the gamesmanship surrounding the old rule, but this is probably for the best.

When was the last time the Pats had 4 rushing td&#039;s in a game? Just for trivia?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the gamesmanship surrounding the old rule, but this is probably for the best.</p>
<p>When was the last time the Pats had 4 rushing td&#8217;s in a game? Just for trivia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polegojim</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polegojim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Replay and review all you want.

Bottom line:  Patriots 47  Jaguars 12 - Jags starters against Pats second/third string even in first half.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replay and review all you want.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  Patriots 47  Jaguars 12 &#8211; Jags starters against Pats second/third string even in first half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neer music</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neer music]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 03:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i could see this becoming a huge momentum killer late in some games..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i could see this becoming a huge momentum killer late in some games..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm717</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lgm717]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 02:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with kairn42.  I think the way it works is that the replay assisstant is looking at every scoring play in the booth.  If it is something that is a no doubter they just go on with play.  But if it&#039;s a play that is close or could be worth another look, they signal down and and the officials on the field then stop play and review it.  In essence every scoring play is being &quot;reviewed&quot;, but it&#039;s by the replay assisstant in the booth and not by the officials on the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with kairn42.  I think the way it works is that the replay assisstant is looking at every scoring play in the booth.  If it is something that is a no doubter they just go on with play.  But if it&#8217;s a play that is close or could be worth another look, they signal down and and the officials on the field then stop play and review it.  In essence every scoring play is being &#8220;reviewed&#8221;, but it&#8217;s by the replay assisstant in the booth and not by the officials on the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: socojava</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[socojava]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 02:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure this happened in the Eagles/Ravens game when an incomplete pass from QB Mike Kafka was ruled a fumble and ran the other way for a score.  It was overturned.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure this happened in the Eagles/Ravens game when an incomplete pass from QB Mike Kafka was ruled a fumble and ran the other way for a score.  It was overturned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kairn42</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kairn42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 02:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, the way I understand it, the announcers are mostly correct.  The refs apparently have a pager/signaler on them and a replay assistant up in the booth will re-look at every scoring play and then alert the refs either &quot;review&quot; or &quot;confirmed&quot;.  Obviously, if someone breaks open and goes in uncontested the communication will be quick and easy so only the dicey calls should matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the way I understand it, the announcers are mostly correct.  The refs apparently have a pager/signaler on them and a replay assistant up in the booth will re-look at every scoring play and then alert the refs either &#8220;review&#8221; or &#8220;confirmed&#8221;.  Obviously, if someone breaks open and goes in uncontested the communication will be quick and easy so only the dicey calls should matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mempusa</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mempusa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew! Memp!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! Memp!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhode Island Patriots Fan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rhode Island Patriots Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 01:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Taylor Price has very good hands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Taylor Price has very good hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanmallettsbluntwrap</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ryanmallettsbluntwrap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[taylor price had a nasty catch , he will be playing alot of snaps this  year with his speed and good route running abilities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taylor price had a nasty catch , he will be playing alot of snaps this  year with his speed and good route running abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damnyoulinelliot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[damnyoulinelliot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hm. That arm motion that Hoyer is making is a little too reminiscent of Brady in the Tuck Rule Game. Now I know that wasn&#039;t a scoring play, but makes you wonder about replay in football from now on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. That arm motion that Hoyer is making is a little too reminiscent of Brady in the Tuck Rule Game. Now I know that wasn&#8217;t a scoring play, but makes you wonder about replay in football from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken0west</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken0west]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fat Tolbert also had his TD reviewed in the SD game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fat Tolbert also had his TD reviewed in the SD game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evpimp</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evpimp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I want is the right call. Tho I dont want to have to watch an extra hour of football because they do this every TD....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I want is the right call. Tho I dont want to have to watch an extra hour of football because they do this every TD&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conseannery</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[conseannery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Hoyer played for the Eagles, some desperate front office would be on the phone now offering a second rounder and starter for him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hoyer played for the Eagles, some desperate front office would be on the phone now offering a second rounder and starter for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nepatriots128154</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/11/new-replay-rule-shows-up-in-patriots-game/#comment-1191346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nepatriots128154]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=146807#comment-1191346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, its a replay assistant? The announcers for this preseason game have been saying EVERY score is reviewed, and I thought that was an awful rule. This makes more sense]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, its a replay assistant? The announcers for this preseason game have been saying EVERY score is reviewed, and I thought that was an awful rule. This makes more sense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
