Skip to content

Aaron Curry’s contract drops from six years to four

Getty Images

For three of the top 11 players taken in the 2009 draft, last week was a bad, bad week.

The Bills cut Aaron Maybin (No. 11), who received a curious hero’s welcome in New York after clearing waivers.  Also, the Bengals opted not to pick up the option on tackle Andre Smith, reducing his rookie contract from six years to four.  The Bengals avoided a $4.75 million option bonus.  (Curiously, the contract didn’t have the standard “non-exercise fee,” which would have forced the Bengals to cut or trade Smith in order to avoid the payment.)

Then there Seahawks linebacker Aaron Curry.  The fourth overall pick in 2009, a league source tells us that Curry recently agreed to a new deal that cuts his rookie contract from six years to four.  It will make Curry an unrestricted free agent after the 2012 season.

In return for early freedom, Curry gave up $5 million in guaranteed money that he’s due to earn in 2012.  It suggests that 2011 will be a make-or-break season for Curry.

All in all, the first 11 players taken in 2009 have had more misses than hits.  Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford (No. 1 overall) has shown real potential, but he has had too many injuries.  Rams tackle Jason Smith, the second pick and presumably the new Orlando Pace, was bumped last year to the right side in 2010.  Chiefs defensive lineman Tyson Jackson has been unspectacular at No. 3 — but in light of the other guys taken around him, we now understand why G.M. Scott Pioli said in April that he’d take Tyson Jackson in that spot all over again.

Raiders receiver Darrius Heyward-Bey has been a disappointment at No. 7, and 49ers wideout Michael Crabtree hasn’t come close to living up to his potential at No. 10.

Permalink 51 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Buffalo Bills, Cincinnati Bengals, New York Jets, Rumor Mill, Seattle Seahawks, Sprint Football Live - Rumors, Top Stories
51 Responses to “Aaron Curry’s contract drops from six years to four”
  1. andrejohnsonforpresident says: Aug 22, 2011 4:23 PM

    2009 is one of the best draft classes of all time.. HAAAA

  2. hendeeze says: Aug 22, 2011 4:24 PM

    Most safe pick of 2009, right Kiper?

  3. eaglesfootballfan says: Aug 22, 2011 4:25 PM


  4. americankris says: Aug 22, 2011 4:25 PM

    The pundits called it a weak draft back in 2009 but damn

  5. tylerdurden0 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:26 PM

    “All in all, the first 11 players taken in 2009 have had more hits than misses. ”

    Don’t you mean more misses than hits?

  6. peopletrains says: Aug 22, 2011 4:26 PM

    And he was supposed to be the “sure thing” in that draft… great job, draft gurus!

  7. freemantowilliams says: Aug 22, 2011 4:29 PM

    Buc Fan here. Boy I am i glad we took freeman that year. Not gonna lie i was mad at first but thats all history now. GO BUCS!!

  8. nyctexan says: Aug 22, 2011 4:32 PM

    haha great pic…

  9. trollhammer20 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:32 PM

    Could really see this coming. If Curry had been a fourth-round pick, then his performance thus far might not be that much of a disappointment. But as the #4 overall pick, he’s supposed to be an impact player, and he has been anything but.

    His propensity for running his mouth on Twitter and picking up dumb penalties (as when he threw the helmet of a Viking offensive lineman this past weekend) doesn’t do much to help his cause. He really doesn’t seem to show much of a head for the game. He has a lot of physical ability, but when it comes to actually utilizing it, he’s left a lot to be desired.

    Time for him to put up, shut up, or wind up a Raider in two seasons. After all, he has a really impressive 40 time for someone his size…

  10. megabeast37215 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:36 PM

    I haven’t heard the name ‘Aaron Curry’ in forever… I’d like to ask all the Seahawk fans how he has looked over the last couple years.

  11. BernardPollardIsAnAss says: Aug 22, 2011 4:37 PM

    Typical Seahawks.

  12. aschwartz2011 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:37 PM

    Josh Freeman!

  13. kuya206 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:38 PM

    As a Seahawks fan, this is good news. It’s either he performs like a #4 pick to be paid or bust. So far, he’s been a bust – He has been a like a Gorilla for us… Massive strength and power, but has no Football knowledge whatsoever.

  14. cornellsteelers says: Aug 22, 2011 4:40 PM

    If the 2009 draft was re-done Mike Wallace would be a top-10 pick.

  15. jigwig13 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:41 PM

    Crabtree shouldn’t be on that list with them guys…MC yards and catches have gone up in his two yrs with the niners..not to mention that half the yr his rookie season he didn’t play and still ended up wit almost 50 catches..I think ppl are caught up because he holdsout and missed training camp all 3 yrs..but ppl forget he’s been getting his numbers with bad qb play…let’s go niners

  16. sweetnlow44 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:41 PM

    Off sides, defense, #59.

  17. rpiotr01 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:44 PM

    I guess it goes without saying that BJ Raji at #9 was probably the best of the bunch. Kinda like how Haloti Ngata at #8 was the best of the bunch in 2006.

  18. raider23mike says: Aug 22, 2011 4:45 PM

    I forgot all about Aaron Curry..

  19. row60 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:47 PM

    The Packers first round picks of BJ Raji and Clay Matthews look even better given the lack of quality in that draft.

  20. jfrogwi says: Aug 22, 2011 4:49 PM

    2009 worked out pretty well for the Packers in the first round. B.J. Raji (9) and Clay Matthews III (26).

  21. blackfootkiller says: Aug 22, 2011 4:53 PM

    He runs around like a chicken with it’s head cut off.
    Over pursues, no cover skills, and can’t rush the QB.
    They have been trying really hard to coach him up and find something he’s good at, hasn’t worked.
    Really fast, really big, and really disappointing.
    Just another in a long line of Tim Ruskell’s first round busts.
    Maybe they can ship him off to Chicago for a 1st round pick!

  22. cured76 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:53 PM

    The guy I wanted that year, Hakeem Nicks, seems to be doing rather nicely for his Giants team. Luckily, the birds team I follow didn’t do too badly. Jeremy Maclin’s biggest problem was getting sick this year but he’s been a productive receiver for us.

  23. ajknox88 says: Aug 22, 2011 4:56 PM

    matt stafford will move off this list after this year, but i do agree hes on it right now.

  24. jagernation says: Aug 22, 2011 4:59 PM

    rah said he would have taken freeman first overall after the draft that year and everyone laughed. who would you take first overall in a do over? freeman and clay matthews are the only 2 options

  25. thevalsalvamanouvre says: Aug 22, 2011 5:03 PM

    Tim Ruskell’s finest pick. Good luck, Bears fans.

  26. jewseverywhere says: Aug 22, 2011 5:16 PM


  27. davikes says: Aug 22, 2011 5:17 PM

    DHB only disappointed Al. He met expectations for everyone else.

  28. hus10188 says: Aug 22, 2011 5:20 PM

    cornellsteelers says:
    Aug 22, 2011 4:40 PM

    If the 2009 draft was re-done Mike Wallace would be a top-10 pick.
    If he’s a top 10 pick then that makes Hakeem Nicks a top 3 pick in that draft.

    The most complete receiver in the 09 draft and soon to be perennial pro bowler, #88.

  29. otistaylor89 says: Aug 22, 2011 5:30 PM

    Raiders receiver Darrius Heyward-Bey taken at No. 7….overall.

    Think about that for awhile.

  30. jetropolitans says: Aug 22, 2011 5:48 PM

    This post curiously left out the success of Mark Sanchez, 5th overall selection in the 2009 draft, Superbowl XLVI MVP

  31. pacificnw7722 says: Aug 22, 2011 5:58 PM

    “Just another in a long line of Tim Ruskell’s first round busts.”

    This is so so true!

    It’s such a relief to know that GM John Schneider is running the show now.

    GO HAWKS!!

  32. lowleadman says: Aug 22, 2011 6:00 PM

    Just thinking back 2 years ago, Curry was a player that could have gone 1 or 2 that year, he was that highly regarded. Seattle did the right thing, based on his lofty status and what were their options at #4.

    Just goes to show you that the draft is a crapshoot. You never know how college players are going to adapt to the pro game. And not just teams are wrong. The so-called experts like Kiper and his bretheren are just as bad.

  33. phelbin says: Aug 22, 2011 6:05 PM

    I was psyched at the time that Crabtree was still available at number 10 and I thought my Niners got a steal. Boy was I wrong. Saying only that “he hasn’t lived up to potential” is letting him off easy. He’s a diva who is apparently allergic to hard work. Heyward-Bey is worse…but at least he tries.

  34. raider23mike says: Aug 22, 2011 6:24 PM

    Atleast Heyward Bey makes 2-3 great 15yd catches every game before disappearing.

  35. cliffordc05 says: Aug 22, 2011 6:49 PM

    Curry is especially disappointing when you consider that Mark Sanchez was taken immediately after Curry. Curry has been a non-factor in most games. He doesn’t have any football smarts and might possibly regress this year without Tatupu at the center linebacker spot. Hawthorne is great as a middle backer but Tatupu made certain that everyone around him was in place and knew their assignment.

    If you needed more proof that Ruskell was a complete disaster, this is it. A franchise simply cannot waste a top five draft pick.

  36. radrntn says: Aug 22, 2011 6:49 PM

    yep, but bspn todd mcshay says a 3rd pick on pryor is a reach…lmao….how many third rd picks make it in the nfl after 4 years?

  37. stampnhawk says: Aug 22, 2011 6:54 PM

    If only 1/2 of Tatupu’s football sense could’ve rubbed off on Curry and his physical tools, he’d be in line for an extension.
    As it stands, he’s got little margin for error under the new regieme.

  38. stonecold1977 says: Aug 22, 2011 6:57 PM

    We took Hakeem Nicks, steal of that draft!!!

  39. jerranamo says: Aug 22, 2011 7:22 PM

    wow.. who would have thought that the best pick ups of the 2009 draft class would have been:
    5. Mark Sanchez – Jets
    8. Eugene Monroe – Jaguars
    9. BJ Raji – packers

    say what you want about each of these three players BUT they are paying dividends for their teams. From what I have seen, each of these players has had their share of growing pains BUT they are still playing solid for first round picks after two years.

    PS – suck it, Kipper.

  40. canjura says: Aug 22, 2011 7:25 PM

    @raider23mike: does DHB even have 45 receiving yards for his career?

  41. frantheman56 says: Aug 22, 2011 7:49 PM

    It really isn’t fair to cast judgement on a draft too soon. However when your team flat out cuts you, or forces you to take a pay cut only 2 years into your contract then it is clear that player has been a disappointment. What is strange is that it was an exceptional draft for WRs yet the top 2 WRs drafted wouldn’t be first rounders if every team had it to do over again.

  42. hawkapalooza says: Aug 22, 2011 7:53 PM

    megabeast37215 says:
    Aug 22, 2011 4:36 PM
    I haven’t heard the name ‘Aaron Curry’ in forever… I’d like to ask all the Seahawk fans how he has looked over the last couple years.

    Imagine T-Joke playing on defense.


    No cover skills, bites on every fake, dumb penalties.

  43. frantheman56 says: Aug 22, 2011 8:16 PM

    Sanchez hasn’t exactly lit it up. The Jets have had a pretty loaded roster the last two years and many times have seemingly won in spite of the play of Sanchez rather than because of. Now with the Burress hype train in full effect it’s time for the Jets to take the training wheels off Sanchez and find out if they have a real NFL quarterback. Dallas is going to blitz the ever living @#$% out of Sanchez in the opener…book it.

  44. snoqualmieterry says: Aug 22, 2011 8:19 PM

    Curry was great as a pass rusher in college. How often does he blitz? I think if we have him blitz, we would see his performance improve.

  45. thevalsalvamanouvre says: Aug 22, 2011 10:30 PM


    Curry was not great as a pass rusher in college…I think you’re mistaking him for someone else. You would think he would excel at it, given his amazing athleticism, but he’s really no good. TE’s bully him around all day long.

  46. youboettcha says: Aug 23, 2011 12:11 AM

    The reason Andre Smith’s contract didn’t include a non-exercise fee was because Andre thought he would have to pay for the right to not exercise.

  47. savannahrose44 says: Aug 23, 2011 3:23 AM

    If restructuring his contract inspires him to get off his butt and make some plays…good move Seattle. However, I’m also not one to forget coach coming out and saying last year that he didn’t know exactly how to utilize Curry’s talents on our team. We shall see what the season has to say about him being a bust or not. If the coaching staff was telling it true last season and in the off season then we should see some better utilization and hopefully better play.

  48. axespray says: Aug 23, 2011 5:33 AM

    Clay Matthews, BJ Raji, Josh Freemen, Mike Wallace, Hakeem Nicks….

    wow raiders/seahawks/niners ….
    them dudes were THERE!

  49. haleyistheman00 says: Aug 23, 2011 7:48 AM

    Tyson jackson is becoming a beast. pioli is a genius

  50. punkymagee says: Aug 23, 2011 11:16 AM

    Gotta say, I was shocked the Chiefs didn’t take Curry given the hype, but it just goes to show once again that Scott Pioli knows what he is doing. That said, it’s a make-or-break year for Tyson Jackson too. Most defensive ends need a couple of years to get used to the pace and the system, but if T. Jack can’t hack it this year, look to see him cut soon.

  51. claymus1 says: Aug 23, 2011 12:22 PM

    Seattle is still signing LB s. What does that say for Aaron Curry?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!