<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Belichick doesn&#8217;t see the point in extra points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:24:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: londonbengal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1225007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[londonbengal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 16:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1225007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMO there should be some thought given to the NFL scoring system to encourage more &#039;big&#039; plays. 

Something like.....

1 point = existing PAT,
2 points = existing 2 point try,
3 points = existing field goal try,
4 points = field goals from behind the 35 yard line,
5 points = defensive safety,
6 points = TD,
7 points = All TD&#039;s scored from behind the 35, including punt/KO return TD&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO there should be some thought given to the NFL scoring system to encourage more &#8216;big&#8217; plays. </p>
<p>Something like&#8230;..</p>
<p>1 point = existing PAT,<br />
2 points = existing 2 point try,<br />
3 points = existing field goal try,<br />
4 points = field goals from behind the 35 yard line,<br />
5 points = defensive safety,<br />
6 points = TD,<br />
7 points = All TD&#8217;s scored from behind the 35, including punt/KO return TD&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1221126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1221126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[patriotinvasion says: 
Aug 23, 2011 12:51 PM 
Listen to your master folks. All the Belichick haters can keep hating but you all know you’d love to have the greatest coach in NFL history coaching your team.

And if you think taping dummy signals in plain view to 70,000 people in the stadium made him who he is than you’re reaching for straws to justify the Patriots whoopin’ your team’s tale for a decade. 

The Dynasty continues bums…haha!

__
If the signals were so &quot;dummy&quot; then why did the &quot;greatest&quot; coach even bother?  Looks like he was pretty stupid to do it if it really didn&#039;t give him any advantage.  Also stupid of you Pats fan to even believe that he wasn&#039;t purposefully cheating.

Oh, and the word is &quot;tail&quot;, New England MORON.  Go back and get your GED, you freakin&#039; idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>patriotinvasion says:<br />
Aug 23, 2011 12:51 PM<br />
Listen to your master folks. All the Belichick haters can keep hating but you all know you’d love to have the greatest coach in NFL history coaching your team.</p>
<p>And if you think taping dummy signals in plain view to 70,000 people in the stadium made him who he is than you’re reaching for straws to justify the Patriots whoopin’ your team’s tale for a decade. </p>
<p>The Dynasty continues bums…haha!</p>
<p>__<br />
If the signals were so &#8220;dummy&#8221; then why did the &#8220;greatest&#8221; coach even bother?  Looks like he was pretty stupid to do it if it really didn&#8217;t give him any advantage.  Also stupid of you Pats fan to even believe that he wasn&#8217;t purposefully cheating.</p>
<p>Oh, and the word is &#8220;tail&#8221;, New England MORON.  Go back and get your GED, you freakin&#8217; idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1221117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1221117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bowlhounds says: 
Aug 23, 2011 2:34 PM 
I wonder why they call this web site PROFOOTBALLTALK.COM when the majority of the morons on here can’t tell a legitimate idea for PRO FOOTBALL from a bunch of whinney a## school girls yelling about who has the better “barbie car”. Most of the non real fans of the game can’t get over the fact that BB has kicked their teams a$$es for the better part of the past decade and even MORE so since “manthoughthewasagenius” turned on the coaching fraternity because BB told him he wasn’t ready to be a PRO FOOTBALL coach, and his panties got all caught up in his girlieboy ideals on how to make a team and cried they”cheat”,like the little bitc%he is . Maybe people should listen to what the man says instead of hearing what they want, the guys a genius when it comes to the game. Get over your pen%% envy of the PATS.

__
What a loser post from a gay loser named butthumps.  The Pats still have a long way to go to top more prominent franchises like the Steelers.  Until then, your team is still far behind.  Much like you were in grade school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bowlhounds says:<br />
Aug 23, 2011 2:34 PM<br />
I wonder why they call this web site PROFOOTBALLTALK.COM when the majority of the morons on here can’t tell a legitimate idea for PRO FOOTBALL from a bunch of whinney a## school girls yelling about who has the better “barbie car”. Most of the non real fans of the game can’t get over the fact that BB has kicked their teams a$$es for the better part of the past decade and even MORE so since “manthoughthewasagenius” turned on the coaching fraternity because BB told him he wasn’t ready to be a PRO FOOTBALL coach, and his panties got all caught up in his girlieboy ideals on how to make a team and cried they”cheat”,like the little bitc%he is . Maybe people should listen to what the man says instead of hearing what they want, the guys a genius when it comes to the game. Get over your pen%% envy of the PATS.</p>
<p>__<br />
What a loser post from a gay loser named butthumps.  The Pats still have a long way to go to top more prominent franchises like the Steelers.  Until then, your team is still far behind.  Much like you were in grade school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1221109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1221109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1historian says: 
Aug 23, 2011 2:35 PM 
Open letter to all of you who hate Bill Belichik:

1) Do you (even in your wildest dreams) even dare to imagine that he gives a s..t?

2) The Patriots were caught stealing defensive signals (by a former asst. coach) in the 1st half of the 1st game of the 2007 season. They were told to stop they did. Given the publicity the incident received would it not stand to reason that the league would keep them under extra-sharp surveillance after that? Of course it does. Any complaints since then? None. 

2) Not long after that rumors, conjecture, etc. started circulating that the Patriots had been stealing defensive signals since, well since forever – probably since (at least) before the civil war. Any proof? None. (BTW – Teams in all sports on all levels have been stealing other teams’ signals – offensive and defensive – since well before the invention of dirt.) 

3) (For being so evil) The Patriots were stripped of their 1st round choice in the 2008 draft. The evil genius ALREADY had the 7th overall choice in the 1st round and then – just to be more evil – he traded down to the 10th overall choice, receiving an extra 2nd round choice, and used that #10 overall choice to pick Jerrod Mayo who (just to irritate all of you that much more) became the defensive rookie of the year. 

4) Your complaints about us Pats fans – we stand accused of being snobs, arrogant, irritating, and just about every other possible fan-crime. 

GUILTY

When you have a team as good as ours to root for that is as good as ours and has been for the last 10 years and shows no sign of letting up – that is one of the bennies of being a Pats fan. When (if?) they start losing more we will shut up, but until then 

a) get used to it

and 

b) get some new material

___
How pathetic.  Just goes to show that outside of bandwagon sports fandom, New Englanders have no life.  

Of course, compared to the hatred that New Englanders have for the Yankees (who have pretty much dominated an entire century of baseball), any &quot;hatred&quot; of the Pats is laughable by comparison.  Pretty much explains the desperation with which New Englanders have clung to this blip in time.  New England sports fans are without a doubt the most childish fans in all of the sports world.  Cry about the boorish behavior fans of other teams (Steeler fans in particular) when they are losing and conveniently forget how to be gracious winners when they are winning.  Biggest hypocrites in America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1historian says:<br />
Aug 23, 2011 2:35 PM<br />
Open letter to all of you who hate Bill Belichik:</p>
<p>1) Do you (even in your wildest dreams) even dare to imagine that he gives a s..t?</p>
<p>2) The Patriots were caught stealing defensive signals (by a former asst. coach) in the 1st half of the 1st game of the 2007 season. They were told to stop they did. Given the publicity the incident received would it not stand to reason that the league would keep them under extra-sharp surveillance after that? Of course it does. Any complaints since then? None. </p>
<p>2) Not long after that rumors, conjecture, etc. started circulating that the Patriots had been stealing defensive signals since, well since forever – probably since (at least) before the civil war. Any proof? None. (BTW – Teams in all sports on all levels have been stealing other teams’ signals – offensive and defensive – since well before the invention of dirt.) </p>
<p>3) (For being so evil) The Patriots were stripped of their 1st round choice in the 2008 draft. The evil genius ALREADY had the 7th overall choice in the 1st round and then – just to be more evil – he traded down to the 10th overall choice, receiving an extra 2nd round choice, and used that #10 overall choice to pick Jerrod Mayo who (just to irritate all of you that much more) became the defensive rookie of the year. </p>
<p>4) Your complaints about us Pats fans – we stand accused of being snobs, arrogant, irritating, and just about every other possible fan-crime. </p>
<p>GUILTY</p>
<p>When you have a team as good as ours to root for that is as good as ours and has been for the last 10 years and shows no sign of letting up – that is one of the bennies of being a Pats fan. When (if?) they start losing more we will shut up, but until then </p>
<p>a) get used to it</p>
<p>and </p>
<p>b) get some new material</p>
<p>___<br />
How pathetic.  Just goes to show that outside of bandwagon sports fandom, New Englanders have no life.  </p>
<p>Of course, compared to the hatred that New Englanders have for the Yankees (who have pretty much dominated an entire century of baseball), any &#8220;hatred&#8221; of the Pats is laughable by comparison.  Pretty much explains the desperation with which New Englanders have clung to this blip in time.  New England sports fans are without a doubt the most childish fans in all of the sports world.  Cry about the boorish behavior fans of other teams (Steeler fans in particular) when they are losing and conveniently forget how to be gracious winners when they are winning.  Biggest hypocrites in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1221089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1221089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[luckynumberlucas says: 
Aug 23, 2011 2:48 PM 
I’d say keep the PAT, but add something like a Field Goal Punt.

Like in Rugby, where you can kick (punt) the ball through the goalposts for 3 points.

Give the teams an option to either kick a PAT for 1 point, punt it through the goalposts from the 20y line and outside the hash marks for 2 points…

That would be interesting and would value punters a bit more…

Just a thought…

__
That basically is called a &quot;dropkick&quot;.   And it&#039;s still legal in the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>luckynumberlucas says:<br />
Aug 23, 2011 2:48 PM<br />
I’d say keep the PAT, but add something like a Field Goal Punt.</p>
<p>Like in Rugby, where you can kick (punt) the ball through the goalposts for 3 points.</p>
<p>Give the teams an option to either kick a PAT for 1 point, punt it through the goalposts from the 20y line and outside the hash marks for 2 points…</p>
<p>That would be interesting and would value punters a bit more…</p>
<p>Just a thought…</p>
<p>__<br />
That basically is called a &#8220;dropkick&#8221;.   And it&#8217;s still legal in the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1221064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1221064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get rid of game-winning FGs as well.  And make it retroactive.  LMAO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get rid of game-winning FGs as well.  And make it retroactive.  LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nannymcsack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1219667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nannymcsack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1219667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there should just be a penalty anytime the ball touches somebodys foot.  then it would almost make sense for the game to be called football.  imagine everytime the ball hit somebodys foot, the whole stadium yells FOOTBALL! 10 yard penalty]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there should just be a penalty anytime the ball touches somebodys foot.  then it would almost make sense for the game to be called football.  imagine everytime the ball hit somebodys foot, the whole stadium yells FOOTBALL! 10 yard penalty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p01ntman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1219586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[p01ntman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1219586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should get rid of punts too then.

Either you  make it on 4th down  or you throw it down  field. 

If you opt to throw it then  you have a chance to recover it. 

if you throw it  then the opponent  may  pick it up and run it.

you could also fake a down field throw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should get rid of punts too then.</p>
<p>Either you  make it on 4th down  or you throw it down  field. </p>
<p>If you opt to throw it then  you have a chance to recover it. </p>
<p>if you throw it  then the opponent  may  pick it up and run it.</p>
<p>you could also fake a down field throw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlr4skins</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1219528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dlr4skins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1219528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Belicheat!

Worry about getting yourself a respecting wardrobe, a non-married girlfriend, help from a bogus tuck rule, and doing something in the post-season sans extra video footage! 

If there was no competative advantage to the tapes, why did Goodell burn them quicker than a crack rock in Lawrence Taylor&#039;s pocket.

Learn some class ala Joe Gibbs!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Belicheat!</p>
<p>Worry about getting yourself a respecting wardrobe, a non-married girlfriend, help from a bogus tuck rule, and doing something in the post-season sans extra video footage! </p>
<p>If there was no competative advantage to the tapes, why did Goodell burn them quicker than a crack rock in Lawrence Taylor&#8217;s pocket.</p>
<p>Learn some class ala Joe Gibbs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pigeonpea</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1218734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pigeonpea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1218734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Belichick,

If it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Belichick,</p>
<p>If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickster2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1218543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nickster2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1218543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[==================================
tjacks7 says:
Aug 23, 2011 12:34 PM

Clearly not thought out. When teams are scoring either 3, 6, or 8 points per score, it would be nearly impossible for a team to be up by 7 at the end of the game.

==================================

and clearly math is not your forte...

16 - 9?
19 - 12?
15 - 8?
18 - 11?
21 - 14?

there are infinite possiblities.

not that I agree with the suggestion, though.  I think the PAT should remain.  More so now that Belicheat has spoken out against it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>==================================<br />
tjacks7 says:<br />
Aug 23, 2011 12:34 PM</p>
<p>Clearly not thought out. When teams are scoring either 3, 6, or 8 points per score, it would be nearly impossible for a team to be up by 7 at the end of the game.</p>
<p>==================================</p>
<p>and clearly math is not your forte&#8230;</p>
<p>16 &#8211; 9?<br />
19 &#8211; 12?<br />
15 &#8211; 8?<br />
18 &#8211; 11?<br />
21 &#8211; 14?</p>
<p>there are infinite possiblities.</p>
<p>not that I agree with the suggestion, though.  I think the PAT should remain.  More so now that Belicheat has spoken out against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donkeykong2011</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1217394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[donkeykong2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1217394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[all you fools would LOVE to have BB as your team&#039;s coach.  

and you know it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all you fools would LOVE to have BB as your team&#8217;s coach.  </p>
<p>and you know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richm2256</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1217271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richm2256]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1217271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@raidermick ;

Amy Trask says &quot;thanks for debunking the stereotype, moron!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@raidermick ;</p>
<p>Amy Trask says &#8220;thanks for debunking the stereotype, moron!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guada1265</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1217257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guada1265]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1217257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Belichick 100%! Take the &quot;puss&quot; out of football. The extra point is stupid, The Kickoff Rule is even more stupid! These dudes make a lot of money to entertain and I realize that there are health concerns, BUT it&#039;s THEIR choice to take on this profession, not unlike crab fisherman, deep sea welders, farmers, oilmen, or any other high risk job. If you want the bucks there will be risks. I&#039;m all for making things safer with technology (kind of like NASCAR achieved with the HANS device) but until then they should assume the risk that comes with the job. Don&#039;t change the game, figure out better protection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Belichick 100%! Take the &#8220;puss&#8221; out of football. The extra point is stupid, The Kickoff Rule is even more stupid! These dudes make a lot of money to entertain and I realize that there are health concerns, BUT it&#8217;s THEIR choice to take on this profession, not unlike crab fisherman, deep sea welders, farmers, oilmen, or any other high risk job. If you want the bucks there will be risks. I&#8217;m all for making things safer with technology (kind of like NASCAR achieved with the HANS device) but until then they should assume the risk that comes with the job. Don&#8217;t change the game, figure out better protection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nofunleague</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1217146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nofunleague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1217146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leave the extra point as it is, but if you miss you lose a point down to 5 points. Wont happen much but may force some to go for 2 points]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave the extra point as it is, but if you miss you lose a point down to 5 points. Wont happen much but may force some to go for 2 points</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nannymcsack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nannymcsack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes beardown, the extra point is indeed worth one point.  unparalleled insight]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes beardown, the extra point is indeed worth one point.  unparalleled insight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toolkien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toolkien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just spit ballin&#039;-

PAT from the 20 is 1 pt, or
PAT from the 30 is 2pts, or
PAT from the 40 is 3pts.

TD scoring team&#039;s choice.

No more rough and tumble 2 pt conversions from the 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spit ballin&#8217;-</p>
<p>PAT from the 20 is 1 pt, or<br />
PAT from the 30 is 2pts, or<br />
PAT from the 40 is 3pts.</p>
<p>TD scoring team&#8217;s choice.</p>
<p>No more rough and tumble 2 pt conversions from the 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beardown2011</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216518</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beardown2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The extra point is used to break the tie. (7-7, 14-14) Eventually someone will miss resulting in a 7-6, 14-13 or 21-20 score.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The extra point is used to break the tie. (7-7, 14-14) Eventually someone will miss resulting in a 7-6, 14-13 or 21-20 score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: descendency</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[descendency]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It makes sense not only from a fan interest (seriously, when I watch a replay of a game, I skip all extra points unless it&#039;s 2 minutes to go and close) but from a safety issue as well. 

Those non plays are low reward, high risk. When you kick off from the 30 (the 35 moreso) the best outcome for the kicking team (reasonably) is a stop around the 20 (give or take a few yards). It&#039;s highly unlikely that a team gets a stop on the 5. However, If something goes wrong, a team can get a lot better field position (or even score). Thus to stop that, teams take risks that are not really necessary and players get hurt because of it.

I hate the new rule, but I hate seeing a guy on the field with his neck broken because he was a wedge buster or a middle man. 

Football is a violent sport, but it&#039;s gotten more violent as time has gone on (because of the &quot;bigger, faster, stronger&quot; stuff) and I can understand why the league can&#039;t have that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense not only from a fan interest (seriously, when I watch a replay of a game, I skip all extra points unless it&#8217;s 2 minutes to go and close) but from a safety issue as well. </p>
<p>Those non plays are low reward, high risk. When you kick off from the 30 (the 35 moreso) the best outcome for the kicking team (reasonably) is a stop around the 20 (give or take a few yards). It&#8217;s highly unlikely that a team gets a stop on the 5. However, If something goes wrong, a team can get a lot better field position (or even score). Thus to stop that, teams take risks that are not really necessary and players get hurt because of it.</p>
<p>I hate the new rule, but I hate seeing a guy on the field with his neck broken because he was a wedge buster or a middle man. </p>
<p>Football is a violent sport, but it&#8217;s gotten more violent as time has gone on (because of the &#8220;bigger, faster, stronger&#8221; stuff) and I can understand why the league can&#8217;t have that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broncobillie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[broncobillie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liked death and taxes, NFL rule changes are inevitable. Since we are going to have them, might as well make the game more interesting. 

So I say aye to BB&#039;s ideas.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liked death and taxes, NFL rule changes are inevitable. Since we are going to have them, might as well make the game more interesting. </p>
<p>So I say aye to BB&#8217;s ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nannymcsack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nannymcsack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^where were you sat aug 20 raidermick?  probably in the parking lot of candlestick poppin shots off cause your raiders couldnt get in the endzone against the freakin niners.  sorry i wont be able to make it to the black hole this season because, as you notcied im on the EAST coast.  thats 3000 miles away and that would put me not in oakland (ie, i have a job). plus, why would i fly al the way across the country to see a complete blowout. ill go to a more competitive patriot victory in philly. thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^where were you sat aug 20 raidermick?  probably in the parking lot of candlestick poppin shots off cause your raiders couldnt get in the endzone against the freakin niners.  sorry i wont be able to make it to the black hole this season because, as you notcied im on the EAST coast.  thats 3000 miles away and that would put me not in oakland (ie, i have a job). plus, why would i fly al the way across the country to see a complete blowout. ill go to a more competitive patriot victory in philly. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fltacks</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fltacks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So he wants to eliminate kickoffs and extra points.  Someone remind me - why do we call the game FOOTball???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he wants to eliminate kickoffs and extra points.  Someone remind me &#8211; why do we call the game FOOTball???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doyousmellthat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[doyousmellthat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Move the snap of the ball back to the 5.  This would create a 22 -yard kick and still be close enough to the goal line for 2 points.  Then spot the ball on the hash on the side of the field where the scoring play ended (like they do now after every non-scoring scrimmage play).  Having to kick a 22-yard PAT on an angle could be a bit more exciting.  Plus, you have the added strategy of which side of the field (or the middle) you score on to make the kicker&#039;s job easier..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move the snap of the ball back to the 5.  This would create a 22 -yard kick and still be close enough to the goal line for 2 points.  Then spot the ball on the hash on the side of the field where the scoring play ended (like they do now after every non-scoring scrimmage play).  Having to kick a 22-yard PAT on an angle could be a bit more exciting.  Plus, you have the added strategy of which side of the field (or the middle) you score on to make the kicker&#8217;s job easier..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: americankris</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[americankris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Belichick doesn&#039;t see the point in not cheat either]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Belichick doesn&#8217;t see the point in not cheat either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pigskinswag</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pigskinswag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Bangachik...er...Belichick. Extra points are pointless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Bangachik&#8230;er&#8230;Belichick. Extra points are pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raidermick</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raidermick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s the matter Boston &quot;cup cakes&quot;, can&#039;t take it when someone bashes your &quot;where the freak were you until this century&quot; freakin team of cheaters? 

The tuck rule does not happen, then you are still the miserable team your were in the previous decades...Your &quot;Coach&quot; will turn into a &quot;Pumpkin&quot; at the stroke of 1:15 pm PST on Oct 02, 2011

We will be waiting for your cookie dough defense-to come to THE BLACK HOLE!!! LOL!!!

Oh that&#039;s right, east coast people are only tough in movies and in fairy tales. 

So you won’t show your Patsy freakin cookie dough faces on that day after all. 

Oh well, that&#039;s the just the wimpy East Coast mentality...We understand you would be terrified. You should fear us, you freakin Cup Cakes. LOL!!!

We will destroy Brady!!!! You hear me? DESTROY!!! 

We will have him on his back all day -if he survives that long - (See Richard S. VS Ben the Rapist.) LOL!!!

Late...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the matter Boston &#8220;cup cakes&#8221;, can&#8217;t take it when someone bashes your &#8220;where the freak were you until this century&#8221; freakin team of cheaters? </p>
<p>The tuck rule does not happen, then you are still the miserable team your were in the previous decades&#8230;Your &#8220;Coach&#8221; will turn into a &#8220;Pumpkin&#8221; at the stroke of 1:15 pm PST on Oct 02, 2011</p>
<p>We will be waiting for your cookie dough defense-to come to THE BLACK HOLE!!! LOL!!!</p>
<p>Oh that&#8217;s right, east coast people are only tough in movies and in fairy tales. </p>
<p>So you won’t show your Patsy freakin cookie dough faces on that day after all. </p>
<p>Oh well, that&#8217;s the just the wimpy East Coast mentality&#8230;We understand you would be terrified. You should fear us, you freakin Cup Cakes. LOL!!!</p>
<p>We will destroy Brady!!!! You hear me? DESTROY!!! </p>
<p>We will have him on his back all day -if he survives that long &#8211; (See Richard S. VS Ben the Rapist.) LOL!!!</p>
<p>Late&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keepounding1234</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keepounding1234]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you kidding me? Who the hell would want to watch 7 minutes of free kicks? Is your son a kicker somewhere??
--------------------------------------------------
From Poland are we?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? Who the hell would want to watch 7 minutes of free kicks? Is your son a kicker somewhere??<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From Poland are we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradleyjames080</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bradleyjames080]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don’t think it is good for the game. Extra points, when you’re up to the 99 percent range in extra points it’s not a play.&quot;

---------------------------------

I&#039;m all for doing something with extra points, but its &#039;success rate&#039; is a weak argument. I&#039;d be curious to see how often a &#039;slam dunk&#039; is successful..... Or how about a few other high percentage stats/plays: Lowest MLB (team) fielding percentage last year was .978! Worst NHL goalie save percentage was .917! How about the success rate of the center-qb exchange. Want to bet that&#039;s around 99%? Should we have the QB self-hike like we do in flag-football? 

If you want to get rid of it because it&#039;s boring and antedated, great ... make them go for 2 or move the kick back to spice things up. But don&#039;t argue against it because it&#039;s a high probability play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t think it is good for the game. Extra points, when you’re up to the 99 percent range in extra points it’s not a play.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for doing something with extra points, but its &#8216;success rate&#8217; is a weak argument. I&#8217;d be curious to see how often a &#8216;slam dunk&#8217; is successful&#8230;.. Or how about a few other high percentage stats/plays: Lowest MLB (team) fielding percentage last year was .978! Worst NHL goalie save percentage was .917! How about the success rate of the center-qb exchange. Want to bet that&#8217;s around 99%? Should we have the QB self-hike like we do in flag-football? </p>
<p>If you want to get rid of it because it&#8217;s boring and antedated, great &#8230; make them go for 2 or move the kick back to spice things up. But don&#8217;t argue against it because it&#8217;s a high probability play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stairwayto7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stairwayto7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you get rid of kickers, you get rid of onside kicks also!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you get rid of kickers, you get rid of onside kicks also!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falstaffsmind</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/08/23/bill-belichick-doesnt-see-the-point-in-extra-points/#comment-1216116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[falstaffsmind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=149323#comment-1216116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing the NFL needs to eliminate is blackouts.  They are the modern day equivalent of debtor&#039;s prison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing the NFL needs to eliminate is blackouts.  They are the modern day equivalent of debtor&#8217;s prison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
