<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vikings could kick in more cash, settle for non-retractable roof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:53:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlblogsyankeeblogspot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1269130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mlblogsyankeeblogspot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1269130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So here is what I dont understand ... I am tired of Rubes in this state that dont see the profit of a publicly funded stadium.  A half a cent increase will increase the profitability of the area exponentially.  It will increase team revenue, and increase the vikings experience for fans.  Anyone that cant see this in minnesota needs to take their you betcha backwards flap hat wearing arse back to the iron range.... get with the program and the rest of the country]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So here is what I dont understand &#8230; I am tired of Rubes in this state that dont see the profit of a publicly funded stadium.  A half a cent increase will increase the profitability of the area exponentially.  It will increase team revenue, and increase the vikings experience for fans.  Anyone that cant see this in minnesota needs to take their you betcha backwards flap hat wearing arse back to the iron range&#8230;. get with the program and the rest of the country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigjim50010</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1240091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigjim50010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1240091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dunno...long term I think a retractable roof could attract a Superbowl. W/o it..no chance.
I dont mean a Superbowl for the Vikings... I mean another venue for the game to be played. MN in the winter cant be any worse than what Dallas was this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno&#8230;long term I think a retractable roof could attract a Superbowl. W/o it..no chance.<br />
I dont mean a Superbowl for the Vikings&#8230; I mean another venue for the game to be played. MN in the winter cant be any worse than what Dallas was this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwhitehurst</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1240079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dwhitehurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1240079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phew! Glad Ziggy is pitching in for a roof. For a minute there I thought we Vikings fans would have to settle for an outdoor stadium, you know, like the Packers and Bears currently have. Oh wait, come to think of it, also our own team prior to 1982. What were we thinking?  And what are the Packer&#039;s and Bears fans thinking? I mean, it gets just as cold there as it does in Minneapple.  But they&#039;re just paleo-football fanatics. Everyone knows the we Vikings fans are above having to dress warm and watch football games outdoors on natural turf. Yuck! How barbaric!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew! Glad Ziggy is pitching in for a roof. For a minute there I thought we Vikings fans would have to settle for an outdoor stadium, you know, like the Packers and Bears currently have. Oh wait, come to think of it, also our own team prior to 1982. What were we thinking?  And what are the Packer&#8217;s and Bears fans thinking? I mean, it gets just as cold there as it does in Minneapple.  But they&#8217;re just paleo-football fanatics. Everyone knows the we Vikings fans are above having to dress warm and watch football games outdoors on natural turf. Yuck! How barbaric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recon163</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1237867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[recon163]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1237867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ brewdogg:

&quot;If the public is against using tax money to build a new stadium, then any state congressman who votes for it would risk not being re-elected. Do you disagree? I’ll assume you don’t.&quot;

They indeed would risk not being re-elected. 

&quot;Then why would any politician approve a plan that would not only cost the state more money than it brought in, but would also get them voted out of office?&quot;

Except for the Ramsey County supes, they haven&#039;t have they? In fact, it is the politicians calling for a referendum isn&#039;t it?

I would assume they are looking for political cover. Fails as a referendum, they won&#039;t take the blame for the team moving. Passes as a referendum, they won&#039;t be blamed for the tax increase. Either way they win with a referendum.  

&quot;So I say once again, let the people who were hired to determine what is in the state’s best interests do their job . . .&quot;

Well it would appear that those who were hired to put the states best interest forward are punting on the issue. What does that tell you about the proposal? 

&quot;And I ask once again, if the people deserve the right to vote on what their taxes go to, let’s discuss the federal pension payouts. . . Do you think that would pass?&quot;

Probably not. 

&quot;Why don’t you concern yourself with the real government largesse and stop obsessing about what is down to a few million a year . . .&quot;

Is this the complain about public largesse forum? Or are we commenting on the story as posted by PFT? Shall I go on a rant about something completely unrelated to the story that we are commenting on? How does that make sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ brewdogg:</p>
<p>&#8220;If the public is against using tax money to build a new stadium, then any state congressman who votes for it would risk not being re-elected. Do you disagree? I’ll assume you don’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>They indeed would risk not being re-elected. </p>
<p>&#8220;Then why would any politician approve a plan that would not only cost the state more money than it brought in, but would also get them voted out of office?&#8221;</p>
<p>Except for the Ramsey County supes, they haven&#8217;t have they? In fact, it is the politicians calling for a referendum isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I would assume they are looking for political cover. Fails as a referendum, they won&#8217;t take the blame for the team moving. Passes as a referendum, they won&#8217;t be blamed for the tax increase. Either way they win with a referendum.  </p>
<p>&#8220;So I say once again, let the people who were hired to determine what is in the state’s best interests do their job . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Well it would appear that those who were hired to put the states best interest forward are punting on the issue. What does that tell you about the proposal? </p>
<p>&#8220;And I ask once again, if the people deserve the right to vote on what their taxes go to, let’s discuss the federal pension payouts. . . Do you think that would pass?&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably not. </p>
<p>&#8220;Why don’t you concern yourself with the real government largesse and stop obsessing about what is down to a few million a year . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this the complain about public largesse forum? Or are we commenting on the story as posted by PFT? Shall I go on a rant about something completely unrelated to the story that we are commenting on? How does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rka3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1237616</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rka3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1237616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@paulharghis
Dummy, they had 5 titles before they moved out there. it’s nice that you know the history of the team you root for.

There will be a huge thud when all of your turds hop off the bandwagon once the rapist retires.

Prior to Rapist/Shaq years- attendance was around 8,ooo. This being after magic and kareem retired.

LA sure supports teams as long as they are winning- What was the article on PBT?
Maybe the least fans to ever see a MLB game?
That was the Dodgers recently. You are an idiot.

I know they had 5 rings before they moved I see the banner hanging every time I go to games. 

You wanna talk attendance and bandwagons, over the past decade only this year in 2011 has the Twins  had a better attendance then the Dodgers or Angels and both are still in the top 10, and the dodgers have been bad for atleast a decade. When it comes to the T-Wolves attendance it&#039;s not even in the same ball park as the Lakers winning or losing. Your tears make me smile and I would like to give a preemptive thank you to all Minnesotans for the Vikings.

THANK YOU COME AGAIN :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@paulharghis<br />
Dummy, they had 5 titles before they moved out there. it’s nice that you know the history of the team you root for.</p>
<p>There will be a huge thud when all of your turds hop off the bandwagon once the rapist retires.</p>
<p>Prior to Rapist/Shaq years- attendance was around 8,ooo. This being after magic and kareem retired.</p>
<p>LA sure supports teams as long as they are winning- What was the article on PBT?<br />
Maybe the least fans to ever see a MLB game?<br />
That was the Dodgers recently. You are an idiot.</p>
<p>I know they had 5 rings before they moved I see the banner hanging every time I go to games. </p>
<p>You wanna talk attendance and bandwagons, over the past decade only this year in 2011 has the Twins  had a better attendance then the Dodgers or Angels and both are still in the top 10, and the dodgers have been bad for atleast a decade. When it comes to the T-Wolves attendance it&#8217;s not even in the same ball park as the Lakers winning or losing. Your tears make me smile and I would like to give a preemptive thank you to all Minnesotans for the Vikings.</p>
<p>THANK YOU COME AGAIN <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoHomeTeam</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1237369</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NoHomeTeam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1237369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[theduuuuuuuuuude says: &quot; . . .  I doubt anyone in L.A. would care if they kept the Vikings name or changed it, they’d just be happy to have a team once again.&quot;

I, for one, must disagree &lt;i&gt;strongly&lt;/i&gt; with this.  I firmly believe that any team that moves here must completely reinvent itself, leaving behind the name, the logos, the records -- anything associated with its former identity -- if it&#039;s going to have any chance of being widely embraced.  The relocated franchise is going to need to functionally present itself as an &quot;expansion&quot; team.

And that includes teams that presently play in California.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theduuuuuuuuuude says: &#8221; . . .  I doubt anyone in L.A. would care if they kept the Vikings name or changed it, they’d just be happy to have a team once again.&#8221;</p>
<p>I, for one, must disagree <i>strongly</i> with this.  I firmly believe that any team that moves here must completely reinvent itself, leaving behind the name, the logos, the records &#8212; anything associated with its former identity &#8212; if it&#8217;s going to have any chance of being widely embraced.  The relocated franchise is going to need to functionally present itself as an &#8220;expansion&#8221; team.</p>
<p>And that includes teams that presently play in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewdogg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1237363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brewdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1237363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, recon, I could go point by point, but instead I&#039;ll just ask a very simple question.  First to set the table.....

If the public is against using tax money to build a new stadium, then any state congressman who votes for it would risk not being re-elected.  Do you disagree?  I&#039;ll assume you don&#039;t.

Then why would any politician approve a plan that would not only cost the state more money than it brought in, but would also get them voted out of office?

So I say once again, let the people who were hired to determine what is in the state&#039;s best interests do their job, and leave the public out of it.  Seriously, when put to a public vote, local school levies fail as often as not.

And I ask once again, if the people deserve the right to vote on what their taxes go to, let&#039;s discuss the federal pension payouts.  They have doubled in the last 15 years, and are at nearly $950 billion.  $950 BILLION for PENSIONS!!  Do you think that would pass?

Why don&#039;t you concern yourself with the real government largesse and stop obsessing about what is down to a few million a year to keep the tax revenue of a $200 million business with $150 million in payroll in the state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, recon, I could go point by point, but instead I&#8217;ll just ask a very simple question.  First to set the table&#8230;..</p>
<p>If the public is against using tax money to build a new stadium, then any state congressman who votes for it would risk not being re-elected.  Do you disagree?  I&#8217;ll assume you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Then why would any politician approve a plan that would not only cost the state more money than it brought in, but would also get them voted out of office?</p>
<p>So I say once again, let the people who were hired to determine what is in the state&#8217;s best interests do their job, and leave the public out of it.  Seriously, when put to a public vote, local school levies fail as often as not.</p>
<p>And I ask once again, if the people deserve the right to vote on what their taxes go to, let&#8217;s discuss the federal pension payouts.  They have doubled in the last 15 years, and are at nearly $950 billion.  $950 BILLION for PENSIONS!!  Do you think that would pass?</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you concern yourself with the real government largesse and stop obsessing about what is down to a few million a year to keep the tax revenue of a $200 million business with $150 million in payroll in the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recon163</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1236326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[recon163]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1236326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ brewdogg:

&quot;A. Great idea. And while we’re at it, let’s let the people vote on the DNR budget, or have a public referendum for each road construction project, or let the people decide whether the state should fund field trips for developmentally disabled adults….&quot;

Uh why not let them vote? After all if it such a great deal for everyone and with all the economic benefits you tout, it should easily pass public scrutiny. 

&quot;Or maybe, since we hired them to collect all the necessary information and make the best decision for their constituents, we should just shut up and let them do their job.&quot;

More like the public will see through the hype and vote no. Better not take that chance Vikings fans. 

&quot;A. Because these “studies” are objective and dismiss much of the information pertinent to making an unbiased judgement.&quot;

Wow. I have heard of studies being rejected for being subjective but never for being objective. Shall we use this study to make a decision? No it is too close to the truth and it is too balanced. Reject it. 

&quot;This ignores people travelling from outside the area or the possibility that someone would choose to use that “discretionary income” outside of the area.&quot;

How many people is that? The stadium only holds 76k. Are you saying that the local area can&#039;t get 76k locals to the game?

&quot;You wouldn’t, oh, I don’t know, go see your favorite team play in a different city, of go to Vegas or Hawaii…..&quot;

You just might. But then again you might not. They might spend that money near home. But I find the argument rather silly. Take my family to Hawaii or buy season tickets? 

Hmmmm.....what are your priorities brewdogg? I am thinking lots of things take a back seat to the NFL. Just because you feel that way doesn&#039;t give you license to tax your neighbors to support your pasion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ brewdogg:</p>
<p>&#8220;A. Great idea. And while we’re at it, let’s let the people vote on the DNR budget, or have a public referendum for each road construction project, or let the people decide whether the state should fund field trips for developmentally disabled adults….&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh why not let them vote? After all if it such a great deal for everyone and with all the economic benefits you tout, it should easily pass public scrutiny. </p>
<p>&#8220;Or maybe, since we hired them to collect all the necessary information and make the best decision for their constituents, we should just shut up and let them do their job.&#8221;</p>
<p>More like the public will see through the hype and vote no. Better not take that chance Vikings fans. </p>
<p>&#8220;A. Because these “studies” are objective and dismiss much of the information pertinent to making an unbiased judgement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow. I have heard of studies being rejected for being subjective but never for being objective. Shall we use this study to make a decision? No it is too close to the truth and it is too balanced. Reject it. </p>
<p>&#8220;This ignores people travelling from outside the area or the possibility that someone would choose to use that “discretionary income” outside of the area.&#8221;</p>
<p>How many people is that? The stadium only holds 76k. Are you saying that the local area can&#8217;t get 76k locals to the game?</p>
<p>&#8220;You wouldn’t, oh, I don’t know, go see your favorite team play in a different city, of go to Vegas or Hawaii…..&#8221;</p>
<p>You just might. But then again you might not. They might spend that money near home. But I find the argument rather silly. Take my family to Hawaii or buy season tickets? </p>
<p>Hmmmm&#8230;..what are your priorities brewdogg? I am thinking lots of things take a back seat to the NFL. Just because you feel that way doesn&#8217;t give you license to tax your neighbors to support your pasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwhitehurst</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1236325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dwhitehurst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1236325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Anything but an outdoor stadium! If that&#039;s all we can afford, then forget it. Why, I don&#039;t want my cappachino getting cold on the way back from the vendor!  No way! Just move the team to LA!&quot;  

Minnesota Pansies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anything but an outdoor stadium! If that&#8217;s all we can afford, then forget it. Why, I don&#8217;t want my cappachino getting cold on the way back from the vendor!  No way! Just move the team to LA!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Minnesota Pansies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theduuuuuuuuuude</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1236190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theduuuuuuuuuude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1236190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s not a stupid argument in this case, because there’s a long tradition of Scandinavian presence in Minnesota. There’s still a considerably large population there (about a third of the state’s total) with Scandinavian roots, and it’s recognized around the country as a focal point of Scandinavian cultural heritage. (And on a more superficial note, the climate in Minnesota is much more akin to Scandinavia than, say, L.A., so it makes an intuitive sense.)

So nice try, dude, but you’re wrong on this one.

--------------------------------------------------
Oh are there a lot of people of Scandinavian descent in Minnesota? I&#039;d never heard that before, thanks for enlightening me!
#sarcasm

I don&#039;t think I ever said that L.A. Vikings is a great team name. Just meant that a team&#039;s nickname really doesn&#039;t matter. You could call them the Minnesota Puppies and it wouldn&#039;t matter, because all team nicknames are pretty much irrelevant. If they did move to L.A. (Which I don&#039;t think they will), I doubt anyone in L.A. would care if they kept the Vikings name or changed it, they&#039;d just be happy to have a team once again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not a stupid argument in this case, because there’s a long tradition of Scandinavian presence in Minnesota. There’s still a considerably large population there (about a third of the state’s total) with Scandinavian roots, and it’s recognized around the country as a focal point of Scandinavian cultural heritage. (And on a more superficial note, the climate in Minnesota is much more akin to Scandinavia than, say, L.A., so it makes an intuitive sense.)</p>
<p>So nice try, dude, but you’re wrong on this one.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Oh are there a lot of people of Scandinavian descent in Minnesota? I&#8217;d never heard that before, thanks for enlightening me!<br />
#sarcasm</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I ever said that L.A. Vikings is a great team name. Just meant that a team&#8217;s nickname really doesn&#8217;t matter. You could call them the Minnesota Puppies and it wouldn&#8217;t matter, because all team nicknames are pretty much irrelevant. If they did move to L.A. (Which I don&#8217;t think they will), I doubt anyone in L.A. would care if they kept the Vikings name or changed it, they&#8217;d just be happy to have a team once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevpft</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235794</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevpft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;salmen76 says: 
Sep 1, 2011 4:16 PM 

Ha ha again. You took the bait hook, line and sinker! You guys are still bitter over getting your butts sent home with a loss to the Saints in the Superdome. Yea, thats right, we got a dome. 
...
We will win 2 out of the next 3 SBs. But even if we don’t and even if we are second class, we’re still ahead of you losers. Yall have zero SB championships. One is more than none pal. Do they teach math in Minn. Fans that complain their team lost because of luck and bad calls are just simply “cry babies”. Geaux Saints!&lt;/i&gt;

Uh, if you&#039;re referring to me as the Vikings, I&#039;m a few states away from there and the Cowboys are the team I follow. The Cowboys that have five Super Bowl wins (8 overall appearances), whose shoes the Saints franchise isn&#039;t fit to shine.

But unless you play or work for the Saints, you&#039;re just another loser who refers to a professional sports team as &quot;we&quot;, when in fact you have nothing whatsoever to do with their success and no one on the team even knows you exist, or cares. &quot;You&quot; aren&#039;t winning any Super Bowls, pal - the highly-paid professionals you idolize are. &quot;You&quot; don&#039;t have any bragging rights - you&#039;re just some chump living vicariously, which is fine - it&#039;s why sports exists - until you start bragging and thinking you have any part in it.

So you just keep your &quot;bait&quot;, and enjoy the Saints&#039; time in the spotlight. But remember that all-time NFL bragging rights take a lot more than one SB win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>salmen76 says:<br />
Sep 1, 2011 4:16 PM </p>
<p>Ha ha again. You took the bait hook, line and sinker! You guys are still bitter over getting your butts sent home with a loss to the Saints in the Superdome. Yea, thats right, we got a dome.<br />
&#8230;<br />
We will win 2 out of the next 3 SBs. But even if we don’t and even if we are second class, we’re still ahead of you losers. Yall have zero SB championships. One is more than none pal. Do they teach math in Minn. Fans that complain their team lost because of luck and bad calls are just simply “cry babies”. Geaux Saints!</i></p>
<p>Uh, if you&#8217;re referring to me as the Vikings, I&#8217;m a few states away from there and the Cowboys are the team I follow. The Cowboys that have five Super Bowl wins (8 overall appearances), whose shoes the Saints franchise isn&#8217;t fit to shine.</p>
<p>But unless you play or work for the Saints, you&#8217;re just another loser who refers to a professional sports team as &#8220;we&#8221;, when in fact you have nothing whatsoever to do with their success and no one on the team even knows you exist, or cares. &#8220;You&#8221; aren&#8217;t winning any Super Bowls, pal &#8211; the highly-paid professionals you idolize are. &#8220;You&#8221; don&#8217;t have any bragging rights &#8211; you&#8217;re just some chump living vicariously, which is fine &#8211; it&#8217;s why sports exists &#8211; until you start bragging and thinking you have any part in it.</p>
<p>So you just keep your &#8220;bait&#8221;, and enjoy the Saints&#8217; time in the spotlight. But remember that all-time NFL bragging rights take a lot more than one SB win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulharghis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paulharghis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[don’t worry about the L.A.Vikings Minnesotans, we’ll turn them into 16x Champions just like the last team we got from you.

Signed
Los Angelenos

=============================
Dummy, they had 5 titles before they moved out there. it&#039;s nice that you know the history of the team you root for.

There will be a huge thud when all of your turds hop off the bandwagon once the rapist retires.

Prior to Rapist/Shaq years- attendance was around 8,ooo. This being after magic and kareem retired.
LA sure supports teams as long as they are winning- What was the article on PBT?
Maybe the least fans to ever see a MLB game?
That was the Dodgers recently. You are an idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don’t worry about the L.A.Vikings Minnesotans, we’ll turn them into 16x Champions just like the last team we got from you.</p>
<p>Signed<br />
Los Angelenos</p>
<p>=============================<br />
Dummy, they had 5 titles before they moved out there. it&#8217;s nice that you know the history of the team you root for.</p>
<p>There will be a huge thud when all of your turds hop off the bandwagon once the rapist retires.</p>
<p>Prior to Rapist/Shaq years- attendance was around 8,ooo. This being after magic and kareem retired.<br />
LA sure supports teams as long as they are winning- What was the article on PBT?<br />
Maybe the least fans to ever see a MLB game?<br />
That was the Dodgers recently. You are an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david7590</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david7590]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 21:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brewdogg says:  Arnold is not the Governor of California, Jerry &quot;Moonbeam&quot; Brown is.  He&#039;s no better though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brewdogg says:  Arnold is not the Governor of California, Jerry &#8220;Moonbeam&#8221; Brown is.  He&#8217;s no better though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yizudien</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yizudien]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Minnesota built new parks for the Gophers &amp; Twins before they built for their most popular team that plays in the most popular league in sports. What? It’s called priorities Minnesota! If you lose the Vikings it’s your own fault&quot;

Gophers was paid for by private money.  Twins is a little easier on tax payers when you consider the cut off sales for 80+ games as opposed to 8 Football games a season.  

Seriously an outdoor stadium in Minnesota, isnt the market for selling tickets reduced for a game in January when its -20 out with a good wind chill coming from the temp difference between inside and outside of the stadium?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Minnesota built new parks for the Gophers &amp; Twins before they built for their most popular team that plays in the most popular league in sports. What? It’s called priorities Minnesota! If you lose the Vikings it’s your own fault&#8221;</p>
<p>Gophers was paid for by private money.  Twins is a little easier on tax payers when you consider the cut off sales for 80+ games as opposed to 8 Football games a season.  </p>
<p>Seriously an outdoor stadium in Minnesota, isnt the market for selling tickets reduced for a game in January when its -20 out with a good wind chill coming from the temp difference between inside and outside of the stadium?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salmen76</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[salmen76]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[kevpft says: 

Yes, the Saints can now stand proud and tall alongside such other one-time SB winners as Kansas City and Tampa Bay. I’d say that’s just about where they belong. A perpetually second-class team that backed into a title thanks to luck and bad officiating.

And i now say. Ha ha again. You took the bait hook, line and sinker! You guys are still bitter over getting your butts sent home with a loss to the Saints in the Superdome. Yea, thats right, we got a dome. The Saints are the second most profitable team in the NFL. Our QB is a future hall of famer. We will win 2 out of the next 3 SBs. But even if we don&#039;t and even if we are second class, we&#039;re still ahead of you losers. Yall have zero SB championships. One is more than none pal. Do they teach math in Minn. Fans that complain their team lost because of luck and bad calls are just simply &quot;cry babies&quot;. Geaux Saints!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kevpft says: </p>
<p>Yes, the Saints can now stand proud and tall alongside such other one-time SB winners as Kansas City and Tampa Bay. I’d say that’s just about where they belong. A perpetually second-class team that backed into a title thanks to luck and bad officiating.</p>
<p>And i now say. Ha ha again. You took the bait hook, line and sinker! You guys are still bitter over getting your butts sent home with a loss to the Saints in the Superdome. Yea, thats right, we got a dome. The Saints are the second most profitable team in the NFL. Our QB is a future hall of famer. We will win 2 out of the next 3 SBs. But even if we don&#8217;t and even if we are second class, we&#8217;re still ahead of you losers. Yall have zero SB championships. One is more than none pal. Do they teach math in Minn. Fans that complain their team lost because of luck and bad calls are just simply &#8220;cry babies&#8221;. Geaux Saints!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rka3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rka3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ jacunn2000:

“The NFL would just not be the same with out Minnesota. L.A. needs to just go away. You have had your chances.”

@dickroy

Come on Minnesotians, keep your beloved Vikings up north where they belong. No such thing as a Viking in LA. Would have to change their name to LA Surfer Boys.
__________________

Don&#039;t approve the 1/2 cent tax increase and don&#039;t worry about the L.A.Vikings Minnesotans, we&#039;ll turn them into 16x Champions just like the last team we got from you.

Signed
Los Angelenos]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jacunn2000:</p>
<p>“The NFL would just not be the same with out Minnesota. L.A. needs to just go away. You have had your chances.”</p>
<p>@dickroy</p>
<p>Come on Minnesotians, keep your beloved Vikings up north where they belong. No such thing as a Viking in LA. Would have to change their name to LA Surfer Boys.<br />
__________________</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t approve the 1/2 cent tax increase and don&#8217;t worry about the L.A.Vikings Minnesotans, we&#8217;ll turn them into 16x Champions just like the last team we got from you.</p>
<p>Signed<br />
Los Angelenos</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: choisbois</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[choisbois]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota built new parks for the Gophers &amp; Twins before they built for their most popular team that plays in the most popular league in sports. What? It&#039;s called priorities Minnesota! If you lose the Vikings it&#039;s your own fault.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota built new parks for the Gophers &amp; Twins before they built for their most popular team that plays in the most popular league in sports. What? It&#8217;s called priorities Minnesota! If you lose the Vikings it&#8217;s your own fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewdogg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brewdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[schemefactory says:
Sep 1, 2011 3:41 PM
brewdeauxgg!!
------------------------

I also accept Leauxrd Brewdeauxgg the Heauxly]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>schemefactory says:<br />
Sep 1, 2011 3:41 PM<br />
brewdeauxgg!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>I also accept Leauxrd Brewdeauxgg the Heauxly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: childressrulz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[childressrulz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[packalltheway1 says: Sep 1, 2011 11:56 AM

To those of you with your taxpayer comments – use your head before you speak. Shame on Ziggy for getting an education and working hard for his money. Guy probably pays more in taxes in one year than you make in a lifetime. And why should he??? I always love it when people think that rich people get a tax break. if it wasnt for rich people, this country would be significantly more broke and there wouldn’t even be football.
___________________________________
Hang on turbo! I think most would agree that the elite wealthy use this country&#039;s infrastructure a little more than the average middle class, small family. There is a reason the rich should pay more; and it&#039;s the loop holes and bail outs that most of us have grown tired of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>packalltheway1 says: Sep 1, 2011 11:56 AM</p>
<p>To those of you with your taxpayer comments – use your head before you speak. Shame on Ziggy for getting an education and working hard for his money. Guy probably pays more in taxes in one year than you make in a lifetime. And why should he??? I always love it when people think that rich people get a tax break. if it wasnt for rich people, this country would be significantly more broke and there wouldn’t even be football.<br />
___________________________________<br />
Hang on turbo! I think most would agree that the elite wealthy use this country&#8217;s infrastructure a little more than the average middle class, small family. There is a reason the rich should pay more; and it&#8217;s the loop holes and bail outs that most of us have grown tired of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broncobillie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[broncobillie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outdoor stadium in Minneapolis? 
The math is easy:

Green Bay = outdoor =&gt;  4 Superbowl rings
Minnesota = indoor   =&gt;  0 rings

Why again do the Vikings need a roof?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outdoor stadium in Minneapolis?<br />
The math is easy:</p>
<p>Green Bay = outdoor =&gt;  4 Superbowl rings<br />
Minnesota = indoor   =&gt;  0 rings</p>
<p>Why again do the Vikings need a roof?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derty Ernie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derty Ernie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This fight is no longer about IF the vikings get a stadium its a power play between two forces as to where the stadium will be built. Ziggy wants it out of town where there is lots of room for malls and parking concessions and the power players with the tax money are waving red flags saying no deal unless its downtown.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This fight is no longer about IF the vikings get a stadium its a power play between two forces as to where the stadium will be built. Ziggy wants it out of town where there is lots of room for malls and parking concessions and the power players with the tax money are waving red flags saying no deal unless its downtown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anarchopurplism</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anarchopurplism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Screw the roof.

MN is one of the world&#039;s best at de-icing planes, getting airport runways, streets &amp; side-walks cleared.

We can certainly get a field cleaned off and die-hards can get bundled up while others get cozy in their luxury suites.

Wouldn&#039;t a heating sub-system underground and foot/seats in the stadium be cool?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screw the roof.</p>
<p>MN is one of the world&#8217;s best at de-icing planes, getting airport runways, streets &amp; side-walks cleared.</p>
<p>We can certainly get a field cleaned off and die-hards can get bundled up while others get cozy in their luxury suites.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t a heating sub-system underground and foot/seats in the stadium be cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schemefactory</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[schemefactory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brewdeauxgg!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewdeauxgg!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicpetro</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vicpetro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The team WANTS an open air stadium. The POLITICIANS made it clear they will not contribute to a FOOTBALL-ONLY stadium. Don&#039;t blame the Vikings, blame the GUTLESS DOPES the good people of Minnesota elected.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team WANTS an open air stadium. The POLITICIANS made it clear they will not contribute to a FOOTBALL-ONLY stadium. Don&#8217;t blame the Vikings, blame the GUTLESS DOPES the good people of Minnesota elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brewdogg</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brewdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[purpleisreallypinkyouknow says:
Sep 1, 2011 3:03 PM
brewdogg says:Sep 1, 2011 2:29 PM

Oh yeah, and to the sconnies taking shots at Minnesota’s education system…..

Did you know that, if Minnesota applied the same percentage of tax revenue to their schools that Wisconsin does, the state would save $2 billion per year. They could build two new stadiums every year if they only short-changed the public schools like their neighbors to the east…..
__________________________________

Unfortunately for you guys, we weren’t inept enough to elect pro wrestlers and stand-up comedians into public office. Maybe your dire fiscal situation would’ve be in better shape with Vince McMahon and Howie Mandel instead.
Congrats on your education system. Good luck getting your ass handed to you in every capacity by your “neighbors to the east” over the next 7 to 10 years.
-------------------------------------------

a)  We were smart enough to get rid of Ventura.  Arnold still holds office in Cali.....

b)  Ventura has been out of office for over 8 years now.  I think maybe the career politician who was more concerned with his future presidential bid than the welfare of the state may have had something to do with our current situation....

c)  So are you really saying you are in full support of your state&#039;s congress?  You might not want to say that around any union folk....

d)  Congrats on your SB victory.  Good luck separating your personal quality of life from the Packers success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>purpleisreallypinkyouknow says:<br />
Sep 1, 2011 3:03 PM<br />
brewdogg says:Sep 1, 2011 2:29 PM</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and to the sconnies taking shots at Minnesota’s education system…..</p>
<p>Did you know that, if Minnesota applied the same percentage of tax revenue to their schools that Wisconsin does, the state would save $2 billion per year. They could build two new stadiums every year if they only short-changed the public schools like their neighbors to the east…..<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>Unfortunately for you guys, we weren’t inept enough to elect pro wrestlers and stand-up comedians into public office. Maybe your dire fiscal situation would’ve be in better shape with Vince McMahon and Howie Mandel instead.<br />
Congrats on your education system. Good luck getting your ass handed to you in every capacity by your “neighbors to the east” over the next 7 to 10 years.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>a)  We were smart enough to get rid of Ventura.  Arnold still holds office in Cali&#8230;..</p>
<p>b)  Ventura has been out of office for over 8 years now.  I think maybe the career politician who was more concerned with his future presidential bid than the welfare of the state may have had something to do with our current situation&#8230;.</p>
<p>c)  So are you really saying you are in full support of your state&#8217;s congress?  You might not want to say that around any union folk&#8230;.</p>
<p>d)  Congrats on your SB victory.  Good luck separating your personal quality of life from the Packers success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombradysponytail</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tombradysponytail]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[joelvis72 says: 
Sep 1, 2011 3:02 PM 
I may be (am) ignorant of architectural materials, but has someone come up with a way to construct a dome out of something that is translucent as glass, giving the effect of open air? The roofs themselves may be too large to be built out of such a substance.

_____

It better have really big windows that we could roll down on a hot, sunny day...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joelvis72 says:<br />
Sep 1, 2011 3:02 PM<br />
I may be (am) ignorant of architectural materials, but has someone come up with a way to construct a dome out of something that is translucent as glass, giving the effect of open air? The roofs themselves may be too large to be built out of such a substance.</p>
<p>_____</p>
<p>It better have really big windows that we could roll down on a hot, sunny day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thephantomstranger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thephantomstranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[tombradysponytail says: 
Sep 1, 2011 2:46 PM 
@brewdogg

Q. Are people who ask and anser their own questions morons?
A. Yes
______________

It&#039;s beneath me to even point it out, but since you&#039;re the guy who always calls me the &quot;grammar cop&quot; (when all I ever point out is spelling errors in comments that insult the intelligence of another commenter), I feel I must.

It&#039;s &quot;answer.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tombradysponytail says:<br />
Sep 1, 2011 2:46 PM<br />
@brewdogg</p>
<p>Q. Are people who ask and anser their own questions morons?<br />
A. Yes<br />
______________</p>
<p>It&#8217;s beneath me to even point it out, but since you&#8217;re the guy who always calls me the &#8220;grammar cop&#8221; (when all I ever point out is spelling errors in comments that insult the intelligence of another commenter), I feel I must.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;answer.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandycratch</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sandycratch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Willing to do the same thing. People from Minnesota pay and support this team. With a reduction in tax payers/money taken in and an increase in the costs of healthcare and services needed for everyday living (our roads cost a bit more than your!) we have to prioritize spending. This year it took a special session to find agreement on these services. So to the author, your article and job is a PASTIME. Getting to work and living healthy lives take priority over any entertainment here. We will continue to love our team. I hope the North Vikings understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willing to do the same thing. People from Minnesota pay and support this team. With a reduction in tax payers/money taken in and an increase in the costs of healthcare and services needed for everyday living (our roads cost a bit more than your!) we have to prioritize spending. This year it took a special session to find agreement on these services. So to the author, your article and job is a PASTIME. Getting to work and living healthy lives take priority over any entertainment here. We will continue to love our team. I hope the North Vikings understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleisreallypinkyouknow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleisreallypinkyouknow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brewdogg says:Sep 1, 2011 2:29 PM 

Oh yeah, and to the sconnies taking shots at Minnesota’s education system…..
 
Did you know that, if Minnesota applied the same percentage of tax revenue to their schools that Wisconsin does, the state would save $2 billion per year. They could build two new stadiums every year if they only short-changed the public schools like their neighbors to the east…..
__________________________________

Unfortunately for you guys, we weren&#039;t inept enough to elect pro wrestlers and stand-up comedians into public office. Maybe your dire fiscal situation would&#039;ve be in better shape with Vince McMahon and Howie Mandel instead.
Congrats on your education system. Good luck getting your ass handed to you in every capacity by your &quot;neighbors to the east&quot; over the next 7 to 10 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewdogg says:Sep 1, 2011 2:29 PM </p>
<p>Oh yeah, and to the sconnies taking shots at Minnesota’s education system…..</p>
<p>Did you know that, if Minnesota applied the same percentage of tax revenue to their schools that Wisconsin does, the state would save $2 billion per year. They could build two new stadiums every year if they only short-changed the public schools like their neighbors to the east…..<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>Unfortunately for you guys, we weren&#8217;t inept enough to elect pro wrestlers and stand-up comedians into public office. Maybe your dire fiscal situation would&#8217;ve be in better shape with Vince McMahon and Howie Mandel instead.<br />
Congrats on your education system. Good luck getting your ass handed to you in every capacity by your &#8220;neighbors to the east&#8221; over the next 7 to 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joelvis72</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/01/vikings-couldkick-in-more-cash-settle-for-non-retractable-roof/#comment-1235445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joelvis72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=151335#comment-1235445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brewdogg:

Super Bowl wins:
Saints: 1
Vikings: zereaux

Seriously, that &quot;eaux&quot; crap gets beaten to death down here, and I personally hate it.

I may be (am) ignorant of architectural materials, but has someone come up with a way to construct a dome out of something that is translucent as glass, giving the effect of open air?  The roofs themselves may be too large to be built out of such a substance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brewdogg:</p>
<p>Super Bowl wins:<br />
Saints: 1<br />
Vikings: zereaux</p>
<p>Seriously, that &#8220;eaux&#8221; crap gets beaten to death down here, and I personally hate it.</p>
<p>I may be (am) ignorant of architectural materials, but has someone come up with a way to construct a dome out of something that is translucent as glass, giving the effect of open air?  The roofs themselves may be too large to be built out of such a substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
