<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The passing yardage insanity, in one stat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1291182</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1291182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[golonger says: Sep 27, 2011 2:53 PM

      str8up12 – WRONG……guys in the NFL haven’t tackled for years…..even when practices were tougher!
____________________________________
You&#039;re right they don&#039;t tackle in practice. BUT I agree with him that lack of padded practices are hurting defenses a lot and to some extent run game. You can&#039;t be tough and physical in a game if you seldom can be physical in practice. The removal of coaches&#039; decision on when and how often to have padded practices is the single worst result of the new CBA IMO.
Dungy said flat out that the 2006 improvement in his run defense in the playoffs was due to his  being able to put them in pads (and he wasn&#039;t a big padded practice guy IIRC). That will never be allowed to happen again. If the 06 Colts had that rule, no SB for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>golonger says: Sep 27, 2011 2:53 PM</p>
<p>      str8up12 – WRONG……guys in the NFL haven’t tackled for years…..even when practices were tougher!<br />
____________________________________<br />
You&#8217;re right they don&#8217;t tackle in practice. BUT I agree with him that lack of padded practices are hurting defenses a lot and to some extent run game. You can&#8217;t be tough and physical in a game if you seldom can be physical in practice. The removal of coaches&#8217; decision on when and how often to have padded practices is the single worst result of the new CBA IMO.<br />
Dungy said flat out that the 2006 improvement in his run defense in the playoffs was due to his  being able to put them in pads (and he wasn&#8217;t a big padded practice guy IIRC). That will never be allowed to happen again. If the 06 Colts had that rule, no SB for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olcap</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1290039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olcap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1290039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@cardiovascularendurance

Nope, on a pc, (actually, I use a few different PCs to access this site), and the problem occurs when you tell it to remember you.  It remembers you alright, even when it decides 5 days or a week later, that you have been logged on too long, so it logs you off, but the commenting box is still available, and it even says I am logged on as me, but when I hit the Submit button, that&#039;s when it says I have to log on to make a comment.  I&#039;m sure this happens to more than just me, and it&#039;s really frustrating to deal with.  That Wordpress would have this bug in the software and doesn&#039;t fix it is hard to believe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cardiovascularendurance</p>
<p>Nope, on a pc, (actually, I use a few different PCs to access this site), and the problem occurs when you tell it to remember you.  It remembers you alright, even when it decides 5 days or a week later, that you have been logged on too long, so it logs you off, but the commenting box is still available, and it even says I am logged on as me, but when I hit the Submit button, that&#8217;s when it says I have to log on to make a comment.  I&#8217;m sure this happens to more than just me, and it&#8217;s really frustrating to deal with.  That WordPress would have this bug in the software and doesn&#8217;t fix it is hard to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golonger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[golonger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[str8up12 - WRONG......guys in the NFL haven&#039;t tackled for years.....even when practices were tougher!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>str8up12 &#8211; WRONG&#8230;&#8230;guys in the NFL haven&#8217;t tackled for years&#8230;..even when practices were tougher!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golonger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[golonger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[marinephinfan ......it is moreso than completions and yards!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marinephinfan &#8230;&#8230;it is moreso than completions and yards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granadafan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[granadafan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you happy now, Goodell?  You bent over for the TV executives who wanted &quot;better ratings&quot; and destroyed the integrity of the game.  Hey, who cares about the fans and players as long as you get that fat bonus.  You&#039;re just like those Wall Street and Enron executives who ruined the country in the name of greed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you happy now, Goodell?  You bent over for the TV executives who wanted &#8220;better ratings&#8221; and destroyed the integrity of the game.  Hey, who cares about the fans and players as long as you get that fat bonus.  You&#8217;re just like those Wall Street and Enron executives who ruined the country in the name of greed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pftwstbshmc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pftwstbshmc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bengalsown says: 
Sep 27, 2011 11:14 AM 
Did you ever think that maybe, all this proves is how much more important an offseason training program is for a defense, than an offense?

NO!  It proves that the moron commissioner is getting his wish of high scoring games with no defense.  He has (as a few have posted) made football a wuss sport.   It belongs to real men, who play real sports and the one in charge shouldn&#039;t be a woman disguised as a man who wants players to wear skirts.  

It&#039;s now off limits to even breath on a QB or a reciever if you are on defense.  THAT is why there are so many high scores.  And God forbid you try to stop either kind of player.  The all mighty GOD-ell  will fine you for DOING YOUR JOB!  Something he has no clue on how to do. 

Goodell if you want to make a variation of football, be judge, jury and executioner in handing out fines, then go to another country and do it.  Stay out of the greatest sport ever in the greatest country ever.  Put it back to what it was and stop trying to re-invent the wheel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bengalsown says:<br />
Sep 27, 2011 11:14 AM<br />
Did you ever think that maybe, all this proves is how much more important an offseason training program is for a defense, than an offense?</p>
<p>NO!  It proves that the moron commissioner is getting his wish of high scoring games with no defense.  He has (as a few have posted) made football a wuss sport.   It belongs to real men, who play real sports and the one in charge shouldn&#8217;t be a woman disguised as a man who wants players to wear skirts.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s now off limits to even breath on a QB or a reciever if you are on defense.  THAT is why there are so many high scores.  And God forbid you try to stop either kind of player.  The all mighty GOD-ell  will fine you for DOING YOUR JOB!  Something he has no clue on how to do. </p>
<p>Goodell if you want to make a variation of football, be judge, jury and executioner in handing out fines, then go to another country and do it.  Stay out of the greatest sport ever in the greatest country ever.  Put it back to what it was and stop trying to re-invent the wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: str8up12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[str8up12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lack of padded practices is your most likely culprit. The only time you can practice tackling and jamming receivers is when you are in pads. The fundamentals are suffering. Too many shoulder tackles at every level of the defence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of padded practices is your most likely culprit. The only time you can practice tackling and jamming receivers is when you are in pads. The fundamentals are suffering. Too many shoulder tackles at every level of the defence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: golonger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[golonger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[psdaleno - that is the way it has always worked dumb-a]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>psdaleno &#8211; that is the way it has always worked dumb-a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marinephinfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marinephinfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a WR and DB have the same right to the football (I realize it&#039;s supposed to be this way, but it&#039;s not) and when today&#039;s QB stops being protected more than the Pope while in his Pope-mobile, passing yards may mean something again.

300yds passing in ~1995 and before= Spectacular!

300yds passing in ~1996 until present= A gimme!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a WR and DB have the same right to the football (I realize it&#8217;s supposed to be this way, but it&#8217;s not) and when today&#8217;s QB stops being protected more than the Pope while in his Pope-mobile, passing yards may mean something again.</p>
<p>300yds passing in ~1995 and before= Spectacular!</p>
<p>300yds passing in ~1996 until present= A gimme!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtisme</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gtisme]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What really needs to change is how Defenses are ranked, currently I believe its by yardage allowed. Who gives a freaky HOOT about yardage allowed?

Scoring Defense is the only stat that means a damned thing these days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What really needs to change is how Defenses are ranked, currently I believe its by yardage allowed. Who gives a freaky HOOT about yardage allowed?</p>
<p>Scoring Defense is the only stat that means a damned thing these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marinephinfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marinephinfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are just now figuring this out? 

Maybe one day you all will also learn that wins and Super Bowls are team accomplishments and not a good judge of a QB or their performance. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are just now figuring this out? </p>
<p>Maybe one day you all will also learn that wins and Super Bowls are team accomplishments and not a good judge of a QB or their performance. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joetoronto</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joetoronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[m2karateman:

Of course, anything can happen. Is that your point?

I was obviously talking in a general sense, that&#039;s all you can do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m2karateman:</p>
<p>Of course, anything can happen. Is that your point?</p>
<p>I was obviously talking in a general sense, that&#8217;s all you can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardiovascularendurance</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cardiovascularendurance]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[olcap- Are you on a mac?  I have issues like that on mine.  I can only comment while on Safari.  Firefox doesn&#039;t seem to work (on a mac) for some reason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>olcap- Are you on a mac?  I have issues like that on mine.  I can only comment while on Safari.  Firefox doesn&#8217;t seem to work (on a mac) for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like Chan Gailey did well by passing on Gabbert, Locker, Mallett, Kaepernick, Dalton and Ponder. Keeping Fitzpatrick so far looks like a great decision: 72/111 (64.9), 841yds, 9tds, 3int for a 103.5 rating, (3-0). 

Passing over running the ball will only grow as the season continues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Chan Gailey did well by passing on Gabbert, Locker, Mallett, Kaepernick, Dalton and Ponder. Keeping Fitzpatrick so far looks like a great decision: 72/111 (64.9), 841yds, 9tds, 3int for a 103.5 rating, (3-0). </p>
<p>Passing over running the ball will only grow as the season continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: failcopter</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[failcopter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controlling the game, and winning the game are two different things. KC has always been among the best rushing teams in the NFL, and last year they limped into the playoffs. Historically, it’s the balanced teams that win games and go to the playoffs, not the ones stronger at running or passing while being weak at the other.  

--------------------------------------------------

KC limped into the playoffs after they gave up 120+ rushing yards to the raiders&#039; backup running back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controlling the game, and winning the game are two different things. KC has always been among the best rushing teams in the NFL, and last year they limped into the playoffs. Historically, it’s the balanced teams that win games and go to the playoffs, not the ones stronger at running or passing while being weak at the other.  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>KC limped into the playoffs after they gave up 120+ rushing yards to the raiders&#8217; backup running back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getweird4u</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[getweird4u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@@m2karateman
The only flaw in your point is that the last 2 champs have had almost NO running game at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@@m2karateman<br />
The only flaw in your point is that the last 2 champs have had almost NO running game at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingokra</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingokra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just passed for 335 yards.  Thanks, Roger!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just passed for 335 yards.  Thanks, Roger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m2karateman</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m2karateman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[joetoronto says: 
Sep 27, 2011 10:53 AM 
Rushing yards are where it’s at, you control the game by running the ball.

This has never changed.
--------------------------------------------------------
Controlling the game, and winning the game are two different things.  KC has always been among the best rushing teams in the NFL, and last year they limped into the playoffs.  Historically, it&#039;s the balanced teams that win games and go to the playoffs, not the ones stronger at running or passing while being weak at the other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joetoronto says:<br />
Sep 27, 2011 10:53 AM<br />
Rushing yards are where it’s at, you control the game by running the ball.</p>
<p>This has never changed.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Controlling the game, and winning the game are two different things.  KC has always been among the best rushing teams in the NFL, and last year they limped into the playoffs.  Historically, it&#8217;s the balanced teams that win games and go to the playoffs, not the ones stronger at running or passing while being weak at the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psdaleno</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psdaleno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wes walker catches a pass and RUNS for 99 yards. that somehow translates into tom brady &quot;throwing&quot; a 99 yard pass????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wes walker catches a pass and RUNS for 99 yards. that somehow translates into tom brady &#8220;throwing&#8221; a 99 yard pass????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olcap</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olcap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally a result of Miss Goodell&#039;s campaign to pussify the game of football.

Someone had better get thos clown out of there soon; maybe send him to work somewhere more in line with his character.  Possibly a head designer at a facotry that makes little pink babydoll dresses.


**On a side note, your site is so freaking lame, when it says you are logged in, you write a comment, and then it says you have to be logged in to comment.  Very. Freaking. LAME.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally a result of Miss Goodell&#8217;s campaign to pussify the game of football.</p>
<p>Someone had better get thos clown out of there soon; maybe send him to work somewhere more in line with his character.  Possibly a head designer at a facotry that makes little pink babydoll dresses.</p>
<p>**On a side note, your site is so freaking lame, when it says you are logged in, you write a comment, and then it says you have to be logged in to comment.  Very. Freaking. LAME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: psdaleno</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[psdaleno]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if this qb/receiver pampering gets any worse, im gonna ask vince mcmahon to bring back the XFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this qb/receiver pampering gets any worse, im gonna ask vince mcmahon to bring back the XFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bullcharger</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bullcharger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[offenses take what they are given... Passing moves the ball down the field more quickly than running and if receivers are open all teams will sling it.  The reason the numbers are suddenly inflated so much is because of the lockout.  The lack of defensive preperation in the offseason is killing the DBs accross the league.  it has already started to change.  Buffalo picked off Brady 4 times... The Patriots picked of Fitzpatrick twice.  Brees thew two picks against houston.  DBs are starting to get better week by week.  The QBs won&#039;t be able to take the chances they have been so far much longer.  back to short passes and running games in the next 2 or 3 weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>offenses take what they are given&#8230; Passing moves the ball down the field more quickly than running and if receivers are open all teams will sling it.  The reason the numbers are suddenly inflated so much is because of the lockout.  The lack of defensive preperation in the offseason is killing the DBs accross the league.  it has already started to change.  Buffalo picked off Brady 4 times&#8230; The Patriots picked of Fitzpatrick twice.  Brees thew two picks against houston.  DBs are starting to get better week by week.  The QBs won&#8217;t be able to take the chances they have been so far much longer.  back to short passes and running games in the next 2 or 3 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packerfan1000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[packerfan1000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With all of the comments people make on here saying how horrible the league is now, please just ask yourself a few questions before posting: Is the game really that bad? Do you really hate it as much as you say you do? Is the game being ruined? Or is it still the best stinking game ever?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of the comments people make on here saying how horrible the league is now, please just ask yourself a few questions before posting: Is the game really that bad? Do you really hate it as much as you say you do? Is the game being ruined? Or is it still the best stinking game ever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: massappeal12345</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[massappeal12345]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe teams are just passing more often.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe teams are just passing more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goawayeverybody</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289103</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goawayeverybody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truly exceptional quarterbacks so far:

Aaron Rodgers, no question
Drew Brees, no question
Matthew Stafford, no question
Matt Hasslebeck?  By all accounts yes!
Ryan Fitzpatrick?  Another yes!

Tom Brady?  Yes, although he flushed a game down the toilet
Peyton Manning, to a certain extent, just by sitting
Tony Romo, but not in game 1
Eli Manning?  Wow, what a fine performance so far]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly exceptional quarterbacks so far:</p>
<p>Aaron Rodgers, no question<br />
Drew Brees, no question<br />
Matthew Stafford, no question<br />
Matt Hasslebeck?  By all accounts yes!<br />
Ryan Fitzpatrick?  Another yes!</p>
<p>Tom Brady?  Yes, although he flushed a game down the toilet<br />
Peyton Manning, to a certain extent, just by sitting<br />
Tony Romo, but not in game 1<br />
Eli Manning?  Wow, what a fine performance so far</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralphie</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ralphie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to see a team&#039;s 6 point red zone success. There&#039;s been a ton of passing yardage between the 20&#039;s in a number of games I&#039;ve seen, but some teams have been able to buckle down in the red and hold the opposition to 3, or even forced a turnover the past 3 weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see a team&#8217;s 6 point red zone success. There&#8217;s been a ton of passing yardage between the 20&#8242;s in a number of games I&#8217;ve seen, but some teams have been able to buckle down in the red and hold the opposition to 3, or even forced a turnover the past 3 weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikea311</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikea311]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so do we need to increase when the bonus kicks in for fantasy football?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so do we need to increase when the bonus kicks in for fantasy football?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardmagnet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cardmagnet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well no wonder, defenders have to play two hand touch with QBs and come to a complete stop to properly tackle a wide receiver without penalty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well no wonder, defenders have to play two hand touch with QBs and come to a complete stop to properly tackle a wide receiver without penalty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Earthquake</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Little Earthquake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is nothing new. I&#039;ve passed for 5,000 yards and 60 TDs plenty of times on Tecmo Super Bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing new. I&#8217;ve passed for 5,000 yards and 60 TDs plenty of times on Tecmo Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regisphilbin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/27/the-passing-yardage-insanity-in-one-stat/#comment-1289070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[regisphilbin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157163#comment-1289070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jag&#039;s cant have more than 5 over the last 5 years.  Time to get with the times...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jag&#8217;s cant have more than 5 over the last 5 years.  Time to get with the times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
