<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big passing yards don&#8217;t correlate to championships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:46:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1294115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1294115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bobhk says: Sep 29, 2011 2:54 PM

This may have been stated here before but lopsided passing stats almost always mask deficiencies in the running game and defense. In the playoffs, when you meet the elite, it’s hard to beat at least three teams in a row with such a flawed team.

That is why, a team like the Pats, will get bounced early in the playoffs this year (much like recent years in the past).

No matter how many Gerrard Warrens or Haynesworths they sign it won’t help. They got away from how they won in 2000s.
-------------

Too easy. Won&#039;t even say it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bobhk says: Sep 29, 2011 2:54 PM</p>
<p>This may have been stated here before but lopsided passing stats almost always mask deficiencies in the running game and defense. In the playoffs, when you meet the elite, it’s hard to beat at least three teams in a row with such a flawed team.</p>
<p>That is why, a team like the Pats, will get bounced early in the playoffs this year (much like recent years in the past).</p>
<p>No matter how many Gerrard Warrens or Haynesworths they sign it won’t help. They got away from how they won in 2000s.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Too easy. Won&#8217;t even say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobhk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1294072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bobhk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1294072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This may have been stated here before but lopsided passing stats almost always mask deficiencies in the running game and defense. In the playoffs, when you meet the elite, it&#039;s hard to beat at least three teams in a row with such a flawed team.

That is why, a team like the Pats, will get bounced early in the playoffs this year (much like recent years in the past). 

No matter how many Gerrard Warrens or Haynesworths they sign it won&#039;t help. They got away from how they won in 2000s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may have been stated here before but lopsided passing stats almost always mask deficiencies in the running game and defense. In the playoffs, when you meet the elite, it&#8217;s hard to beat at least three teams in a row with such a flawed team.</p>
<p>That is why, a team like the Pats, will get bounced early in the playoffs this year (much like recent years in the past). </p>
<p>No matter how many Gerrard Warrens or Haynesworths they sign it won&#8217;t help. They got away from how they won in 2000s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grilledjesus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grilledjesus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CKL says: 
Sep 29, 2011 10:33 AM 
Please tell me you aren’t a NYG fan and think that ANYTHING but your defense, oline dominance and run game won that SB 
---------------------------------------------
I completely agree that the NYG defense was the biggest contributer to that win, but to say the running game played a larger roll than the passing game is just plain wrong. Feel free to go back and look at the Giants scoring drives, you may notice that the only drive they scored on while primarily running was for a FG. Both TD drives were almost exclusively passing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CKL says:<br />
Sep 29, 2011 10:33 AM<br />
Please tell me you aren’t a NYG fan and think that ANYTHING but your defense, oline dominance and run game won that SB<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I completely agree that the NYG defense was the biggest contributer to that win, but to say the running game played a larger roll than the passing game is just plain wrong. Feel free to go back and look at the Giants scoring drives, you may notice that the only drive they scored on while primarily running was for a FG. Both TD drives were almost exclusively passing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CKL</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293383</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CKL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blackcatnfl says: Sep 29, 2011 1:11 AM

Because of pass-happy rule changes in recent years, this is a changing dynamic in the NFL and its really too early to draw that conclusion. In recent playoffs, defense has had a declining impact and its quite possible that defense no longer will win championships depending on how the calls in these critical games are made in 2011 and beyond.
----------------------------------------------------------------
That must be why in SB 45, the #1 &amp; #2 defenses in the entire NFL in points allowed were in it, but the top 2 QBs in the NFL in rating/yards weren&#039;t.
****************************************
grilledjesus says: Sep 29, 2011 9:47 AM

raiderlyfe510 says:
Sep 28, 2011 11:15 PM
Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber…But not in January.
————————————————

Ah yes, I remember that SB in 2008. It was surely the 91yds and 0tds that the Giants had rushing that won the game for them. Those touchdown passes were just there for show.
_____________________________________
Please tell me you aren&#039;t a NYG fan and think that ANYTHING but your defense, oline dominance and run game won that SB (run games kill clock not allowing the other o to get on the field). Scoring 17 pts wouldn&#039;t cut it in a lot of wins. Your defense holding the best PPG offense in the league that year to 14 does. Eli played very well in the playoff wins up to the SB but was quite average  (and lucky) IN the actual SB. I bet he was happy when Samuel wound up in his division.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blackcatnfl says: Sep 29, 2011 1:11 AM</p>
<p>Because of pass-happy rule changes in recent years, this is a changing dynamic in the NFL and its really too early to draw that conclusion. In recent playoffs, defense has had a declining impact and its quite possible that defense no longer will win championships depending on how the calls in these critical games are made in 2011 and beyond.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
That must be why in SB 45, the #1 &amp; #2 defenses in the entire NFL in points allowed were in it, but the top 2 QBs in the NFL in rating/yards weren&#8217;t.<br />
****************************************<br />
grilledjesus says: Sep 29, 2011 9:47 AM</p>
<p>raiderlyfe510 says:<br />
Sep 28, 2011 11:15 PM<br />
Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber…But not in January.<br />
————————————————</p>
<p>Ah yes, I remember that SB in 2008. It was surely the 91yds and 0tds that the Giants had rushing that won the game for them. Those touchdown passes were just there for show.<br />
_____________________________________<br />
Please tell me you aren&#8217;t a NYG fan and think that ANYTHING but your defense, oline dominance and run game won that SB (run games kill clock not allowing the other o to get on the field). Scoring 17 pts wouldn&#8217;t cut it in a lot of wins. Your defense holding the best PPG offense in the league that year to 14 does. Eli played very well in the playoff wins up to the SB but was quite average  (and lucky) IN the actual SB. I bet he was happy when Samuel wound up in his division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yards don&#039;t matter.

The stat that matters for Offenses are third down conversions, limiting turnovers, red zone %, and points.

Wether you do it running/or passing, it doesn&#039;t matter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yards don&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>The stat that matters for Offenses are third down conversions, limiting turnovers, red zone %, and points.</p>
<p>Wether you do it running/or passing, it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joetoronto</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joetoronto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is all a bunch of crap.

A dominating run game and a good run defense is where it&#039;s at.

You only need to be decent at passing the ball and against the pass.

A dominating run game will protect the defense and raise your TOP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all a bunch of crap.</p>
<p>A dominating run game and a good run defense is where it&#8217;s at.</p>
<p>You only need to be decent at passing the ball and against the pass.</p>
<p>A dominating run game will protect the defense and raise your TOP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grilledjesus</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grilledjesus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[raiderlyfe510 says: 
Sep 28, 2011 11:15 PM 
Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber…But not in January.
------------------------------------------------

Ah yes, I remember that SB in 2008. It was surely the 91yds and 0tds that the Giants had rushing that won the game for them. Those touchdown passes were just there for show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>raiderlyfe510 says:<br />
Sep 28, 2011 11:15 PM<br />
Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber…But not in January.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Ah yes, I remember that SB in 2008. It was surely the 91yds and 0tds that the Giants had rushing that won the game for them. Those touchdown passes were just there for show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xinellum</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xinellum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I understand this article correctly, it is basically saying that the teams that pass the most don&#039;t necessarily win the super bowl and then a commentor pointed out that leading the league in rushing doesn&#039;t win the super bowl either.  So my only deduction is, if passing and running has nothing to do with winning the super bowl, then why don&#039;t teams just sit down in the middle of the field and win (since the only 2 ways to move the ball on offense, outside penalties, is to run or pass) .  What kind of useless dribble is this article anyway?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I understand this article correctly, it is basically saying that the teams that pass the most don&#8217;t necessarily win the super bowl and then a commentor pointed out that leading the league in rushing doesn&#8217;t win the super bowl either.  So my only deduction is, if passing and running has nothing to do with winning the super bowl, then why don&#8217;t teams just sit down in the middle of the field and win (since the only 2 ways to move the ball on offense, outside penalties, is to run or pass) .  What kind of useless dribble is this article anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forthelove</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293221</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forthelove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Control the line-of-scrimmage (on offense and defense). 

2. Solid D. 

3. Solid running game. 

4. Competent passing game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Control the line-of-scrimmage (on offense and defense). </p>
<p>2. Solid D. </p>
<p>3. Solid running game. </p>
<p>4. Competent passing game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: descendency</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[descendency]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with record years is that it doesn&#039;t account for how bad your defense is.

If your defense gives up points every 3 minutes, but you put up 1000 yards per game, you probably aren&#039;t going to win playoff games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with record years is that it doesn&#8217;t account for how bad your defense is.</p>
<p>If your defense gives up points every 3 minutes, but you put up 1000 yards per game, you probably aren&#8217;t going to win playoff games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hockeyfan1701</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hockeyfan1701]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray Lewis said it best, Offense sells tickets and Defense wins championships]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray Lewis said it best, Offense sells tickets and Defense wins championships</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imopen7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[imopen7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ah la Big Ben. nuff said. Oh, and if you want to get technical, yards per reception DOES have a direct correlation to winning....again ah la Big Ben.

GO STEELERS!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah la Big Ben. nuff said. Oh, and if you want to get technical, yards per reception DOES have a direct correlation to winning&#8230;.again ah la Big Ben.</p>
<p>GO STEELERS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kisstherings</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kisstherings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big yardage would have a lot to do with winning a Super Bowl if the defense stepped up.  

Brady wasn&#039;t on the field when a fluke scramble by Eli Manning relulted in the one of the luckiest fluke catches in Super Bowl History.

That one catch isn&#039;t made and Brady&#039;s 2007 season is on the other side of your study.  Doesn&#039;t seem to have much to do with the QB&#039;s yards as much as the defense.  And in Brady/Patriots case you can say that is definately true because Belichick doesn&#039;t care what the score is.  He will keep throwing if its 40-3 if it is what the opposing defense gives him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big yardage would have a lot to do with winning a Super Bowl if the defense stepped up.  </p>
<p>Brady wasn&#8217;t on the field when a fluke scramble by Eli Manning relulted in the one of the luckiest fluke catches in Super Bowl History.</p>
<p>That one catch isn&#8217;t made and Brady&#8217;s 2007 season is on the other side of your study.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to have much to do with the QB&#8217;s yards as much as the defense.  And in Brady/Patriots case you can say that is definately true because Belichick doesn&#8217;t care what the score is.  He will keep throwing if its 40-3 if it is what the opposing defense gives him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1293021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1293021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You must have a good passing/running ratio with a decent Defense to have a higher Superbowl winning percentage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must have a good passing/running ratio with a decent Defense to have a higher Superbowl winning percentage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealsmiley</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[therealsmiley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raiderly captured it.  Rushing and a good defense.  Hail!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raiderly captured it.  Rushing and a good defense.  Hail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingkreg12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingkreg12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask Brady too... he won 3 rings when he had some strong defenses and they had more emphasis on the running game. 

Pats haven&#039;t won a SB since Brady really developed into an elite passer(Cue spygate comments)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask Brady too&#8230; he won 3 rings when he had some strong defenses and they had more emphasis on the running game. </p>
<p>Pats haven&#8217;t won a SB since Brady really developed into an elite passer(Cue spygate comments)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scudbot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scudbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;TOTAL yards passing may be irrelevant, but it is a documented fact that YARDS PER PASS ATTEMPT is the stat which is most highly correlated with winning.&quot;  Except for Romo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TOTAL yards passing may be irrelevant, but it is a documented fact that YARDS PER PASS ATTEMPT is the stat which is most highly correlated with winning.&#8221;  Except for Romo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scudbot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292946</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scudbot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Volume stats are meaningless …us big Ben supporters have been saying this for years&quot;  Leaving aside the implication that two smoking sexual assault guns don&#039;t mean anything, your point is somewhat well taken.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Volume stats are meaningless …us big Ben supporters have been saying this for years&#8221;  Leaving aside the implication that two smoking sexual assault guns don&#8217;t mean anything, your point is somewhat well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackcatnfl</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blackcatnfl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because of pass-happy rule changes in recent years, this is a changing dynamic in the NFL and its really too early to draw that conclusion.  In recent playoffs, defense has had a declining impact and its quite possible that defense no longer will win championships depending on how the calls in these critical games are made in 2011 and beyond.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of pass-happy rule changes in recent years, this is a changing dynamic in the NFL and its really too early to draw that conclusion.  In recent playoffs, defense has had a declining impact and its quite possible that defense no longer will win championships depending on how the calls in these critical games are made in 2011 and beyond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosanostra71</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cosanostra71]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[part of it is because you rack up more passing yards when you&#039;re constantly coming from behind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>part of it is because you rack up more passing yards when you&#8217;re constantly coming from behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCxShow</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MCxShow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hats off to Tom Curran, this is a really interesting stat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hats off to Tom Curran, this is a really interesting stat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huejackson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huejackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raiders are going to win the super bowl..
 it will be the first time in history ESPN does not mention the superbowl..
No Highlights, No talk about it.. Nothing
Instead they will review the last little leauge world series..
Anything but mention the Raiders won a game because in the words of Tom Jackson when Raiders beat the Chargers last year and of course ESPN did not show a single highlight but they just said at the end of prime time &quot;oh and the raiders beat the chargers for the second time&#039; QUE TOM JACKSON 
&quot;IT&#039;S A DAMN SHAME&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raiders are going to win the super bowl..<br />
 it will be the first time in history ESPN does not mention the superbowl..<br />
No Highlights, No talk about it.. Nothing<br />
Instead they will review the last little leauge world series..<br />
Anything but mention the Raiders won a game because in the words of Tom Jackson when Raiders beat the Chargers last year and of course ESPN did not show a single highlight but they just said at the end of prime time &#8220;oh and the raiders beat the chargers for the second time&#8217; QUE TOM JACKSON<br />
&#8220;IT&#8217;S A DAMN SHAME&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keeponhating</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[keeponhating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweet so hopefully Philip rivers never wins a SB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet so hopefully Philip rivers never wins a SB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raiderlyfe510</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292839</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raiderlyfe510]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Running the ball and stopping the run wins championships. 

Ask John Elway who lost three superbowls before T Davis...

Ask Marino.

Ask any Run &amp; Shoot team from the 90&#039;s(houston, Atlanta, and Detroit)

Ask the Bills who lost to power running teams in the championship.

Ask Air Coryell and the early 80&#039;s Chargers.

Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber...But not in  January.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running the ball and stopping the run wins championships. </p>
<p>Ask John Elway who lost three superbowls before T Davis&#8230;</p>
<p>Ask Marino.</p>
<p>Ask any Run &amp; Shoot team from the 90&#8242;s(houston, Atlanta, and Detroit)</p>
<p>Ask the Bills who lost to power running teams in the championship.</p>
<p>Ask Air Coryell and the early 80&#8242;s Chargers.</p>
<p>Passing the ball for a lot of yards will win you a lot of games from September to Decemeber&#8230;But not in  January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catdelmonte</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[catdelmonte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lets look at the top rushing seasons

Rk

Player

Team

Yards

Year



1

Eric Dickerson

Los Angeles Rams

2,105

1984



2

Jamal Lewis 

Baltimore Ravens

2,066

2003



3

Barry Sanders

Detroit Lions

2,053

1997



4

Terrell Davis 

Denver Broncos

2,008

1998



5

Chris Johnson 

Tennessee Titans 

2,006

2009



6

O.J. Simpson

Buffalo Bills

2,003

1973



7

Earl Campbell

Houston Oilers

1,934

1980



T8

Ahman Green 

Green Bay Packers

1,883

2003



T8

Barry Sanders

Detroit Lions

1,883

1994



10

Shaun Alexander 

Seattle Seahawks

1,880

2005



11

Jim Brown

Cleveland Browns

1,863

1963



12

Tiki Barber 

New York Giants

1,860

2005



13

Ricky Williams 

Miami Dolphins

1,853

2002



14

Walter Payton

Chicago Bears

1,852

1977



15

Jamal Anderson 

Atlanta Falcons

1,846

1998



16

Eric Dickerson

Los Angeles Rams

1,821

1986



17

O.J. Simpson

Buffalo Bills

1,817

1975



18

LaDainian Tomlinson 

San Diego Chargers

1,815

2006



19

Eric Dickerson

Los Angeles Rams

1,808

1983



20

Larry Johnson 

Kansas City Chiefs

1,789

2006

1 superbowl, Its not all about rushing either but that said i dont think there is a cut out ratio to win the superbowl, just do what scores points]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lets look at the top rushing seasons</p>
<p>Rk</p>
<p>Player</p>
<p>Team</p>
<p>Yards</p>
<p>Year</p>
<p>1</p>
<p>Eric Dickerson</p>
<p>Los Angeles Rams</p>
<p>2,105</p>
<p>1984</p>
<p>2</p>
<p>Jamal Lewis </p>
<p>Baltimore Ravens</p>
<p>2,066</p>
<p>2003</p>
<p>3</p>
<p>Barry Sanders</p>
<p>Detroit Lions</p>
<p>2,053</p>
<p>1997</p>
<p>4</p>
<p>Terrell Davis </p>
<p>Denver Broncos</p>
<p>2,008</p>
<p>1998</p>
<p>5</p>
<p>Chris Johnson </p>
<p>Tennessee Titans </p>
<p>2,006</p>
<p>2009</p>
<p>6</p>
<p>O.J. Simpson</p>
<p>Buffalo Bills</p>
<p>2,003</p>
<p>1973</p>
<p>7</p>
<p>Earl Campbell</p>
<p>Houston Oilers</p>
<p>1,934</p>
<p>1980</p>
<p>T8</p>
<p>Ahman Green </p>
<p>Green Bay Packers</p>
<p>1,883</p>
<p>2003</p>
<p>T8</p>
<p>Barry Sanders</p>
<p>Detroit Lions</p>
<p>1,883</p>
<p>1994</p>
<p>10</p>
<p>Shaun Alexander </p>
<p>Seattle Seahawks</p>
<p>1,880</p>
<p>2005</p>
<p>11</p>
<p>Jim Brown</p>
<p>Cleveland Browns</p>
<p>1,863</p>
<p>1963</p>
<p>12</p>
<p>Tiki Barber </p>
<p>New York Giants</p>
<p>1,860</p>
<p>2005</p>
<p>13</p>
<p>Ricky Williams </p>
<p>Miami Dolphins</p>
<p>1,853</p>
<p>2002</p>
<p>14</p>
<p>Walter Payton</p>
<p>Chicago Bears</p>
<p>1,852</p>
<p>1977</p>
<p>15</p>
<p>Jamal Anderson </p>
<p>Atlanta Falcons</p>
<p>1,846</p>
<p>1998</p>
<p>16</p>
<p>Eric Dickerson</p>
<p>Los Angeles Rams</p>
<p>1,821</p>
<p>1986</p>
<p>17</p>
<p>O.J. Simpson</p>
<p>Buffalo Bills</p>
<p>1,817</p>
<p>1975</p>
<p>18</p>
<p>LaDainian Tomlinson </p>
<p>San Diego Chargers</p>
<p>1,815</p>
<p>2006</p>
<p>19</p>
<p>Eric Dickerson</p>
<p>Los Angeles Rams</p>
<p>1,808</p>
<p>1983</p>
<p>20</p>
<p>Larry Johnson </p>
<p>Kansas City Chiefs</p>
<p>1,789</p>
<p>2006</p>
<p>1 superbowl, Its not all about rushing either but that said i dont think there is a cut out ratio to win the superbowl, just do what scores points</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: favreforever</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[favreforever]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coincidentally, the bottom 34 single season passing yardage totals were not represented at the Super Bowl either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, the bottom 34 single season passing yardage totals were not represented at the Super Bowl either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daddyoscar</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daddyoscar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ps

in o7 manning only played 1 qtr last game, warner ditto in 2,000 and brees as well in 09,  rodgers missed almost 2 games due to injury last year, flynn, sorgi, brunell, germaine all also passed for yardage]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps</p>
<p>in o7 manning only played 1 qtr last game, warner ditto in 2,000 and brees as well in 09,  rodgers missed almost 2 games due to injury last year, flynn, sorgi, brunell, germaine all also passed for yardage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KeepitReal</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KeepitReal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this day of everyone thinking they&#039;re an expert and thinking you need a Pro Bowl Quarter Back to get to the Super Bowl. Don&#039;t be surprised a team like the Raiders make a Super Bowl run. Great offensive line. Great Runners and an Average QB who gets hot. We’ve seen it before. They also have a really physical on defense. The era of the runners controlling the game will return at some point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this day of everyone thinking they&#8217;re an expert and thinking you need a Pro Bowl Quarter Back to get to the Super Bowl. Don&#8217;t be surprised a team like the Raiders make a Super Bowl run. Great offensive line. Great Runners and an Average QB who gets hot. We’ve seen it before. They also have a really physical on defense. The era of the runners controlling the game will return at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j0esixpack</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[j0esixpack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Pats fan I&#039;ve been saying all along - big passing numbers are usually put up when teams NEED to put up big numbers.

It&#039;s cool that Brady&#039;s up to the task - but I&#039;d prefer he not need to put up numbers like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Pats fan I&#8217;ve been saying all along &#8211; big passing numbers are usually put up when teams NEED to put up big numbers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cool that Brady&#8217;s up to the task &#8211; but I&#8217;d prefer he not need to put up numbers like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nkappel</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/09/28/big-passing-yards-doesnt-correlate-to-championships/#comment-1292821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nkappel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=157506#comment-1292821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yea but, the game is changing. As you wrote, many of the SB champs in recent history have been passing teams, many of them QBd by guys on this list...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea but, the game is changing. As you wrote, many of the SB champs in recent history have been passing teams, many of them QBd by guys on this list&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
