<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week Four power rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:57:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lloyd1s</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1307590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lloyd1s]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 03:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1307590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Lets stick to facts shall we (and not some persons opinion rankings) Flacco is 23rd thru 4 games in total QBR. His turnovers (fumbles and interceptions) are equal to his touchdown throws. He can’t stretch the field since he has Pennington type arm strength. He hands off 44% of the time (near the top of the league) because it’s what he does best. You need a Rodgers or a Brees in the 2011 NFL. It’s a pass first league. The Raven plan (win 13-7 with it’s defense and low octane offense) is obsolete.&quot;

The fact is Flacco has one of the strongest arms in the league, and can throw a beaut of a deep ball.  Another fact is that over his first three and a quarter seasons, Flacco has one of the best winning records of any quarterback, ever.  Yet another fact is that over his first three seasons, he has more road playoff wins than anyone.  He&#039;s the only one to win at least one road playoff game in each of his first three seasons.  I&#039;ll grant that he had a heck of a lot of help with those feats, but I&#039;m not about to denigrate him for being surrounded by a lot of talent.  Yeah, he can occasionally throw a stinker of a game, especially against a really good defense.  That aspect of his game might be a little worse at the moment, probably because he&#039;s still building a rapport with some young receivers.  I still would not be surprised if Flacco eventually becomes one of the best QBs in the league.  If not, he&#039;ll still be good enough to win a lot of games, given Ozzie&#039;s penchant for getting great talent overall.  If the Ravens do end up playing the Pats in this year&#039;s playoffs, I think they&#039;ll win.  If they end up playing the Pack in Indy, well that they could lose.  But maybe they won&#039;t...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Lets stick to facts shall we (and not some persons opinion rankings) Flacco is 23rd thru 4 games in total QBR. His turnovers (fumbles and interceptions) are equal to his touchdown throws. He can’t stretch the field since he has Pennington type arm strength. He hands off 44% of the time (near the top of the league) because it’s what he does best. You need a Rodgers or a Brees in the 2011 NFL. It’s a pass first league. The Raven plan (win 13-7 with it’s defense and low octane offense) is obsolete.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact is Flacco has one of the strongest arms in the league, and can throw a beaut of a deep ball.  Another fact is that over his first three and a quarter seasons, Flacco has one of the best winning records of any quarterback, ever.  Yet another fact is that over his first three seasons, he has more road playoff wins than anyone.  He&#8217;s the only one to win at least one road playoff game in each of his first three seasons.  I&#8217;ll grant that he had a heck of a lot of help with those feats, but I&#8217;m not about to denigrate him for being surrounded by a lot of talent.  Yeah, he can occasionally throw a stinker of a game, especially against a really good defense.  That aspect of his game might be a little worse at the moment, probably because he&#8217;s still building a rapport with some young receivers.  I still would not be surprised if Flacco eventually becomes one of the best QBs in the league.  If not, he&#8217;ll still be good enough to win a lot of games, given Ozzie&#8217;s penchant for getting great talent overall.  If the Ravens do end up playing the Pats in this year&#8217;s playoffs, I think they&#8217;ll win.  If they end up playing the Pack in Indy, well that they could lose.  But maybe they won&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blu4l1fe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1306085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blu4l1fe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1306085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to say, I am enjoying reading the back and forth banter, but let’s get back to reality for a minute.  Like most have stated here, these rankings do not, let me repeat, do not mean anything at this point, except maybe to hype some fans up (insert Skins fans here).  Yes, the Pack and the Saints are early favorites, especially because they are the two previous Super Bowl winners and they are always in the running, not just on paper, but in the standings.  But for everyone else, even the Giants, which I’m a fan of, the standing does not do anything for them, and it will not bring them to the playoffs or win them the championship.  So for the Skin fans irate about their ranking…. GET OVER IT!!!  Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, if the lowly Eagles beat a good Bills team next week, where should they be in the ranking?  And, if the Eagles then beat the Skins the following week, where should the Skins rank?  Come on, these are weekly rankings, and that’s the only thing they are.  They do not predict who eventually will be in the Super Bowl and who wins it.  And for the Skins fan, just be happy where you are, please get over it and enjoy how your team is playing.  Yes, their quarterback and running back play have really picked up but as far as being contenders, not only this year, but for years to come, AGAIN, let&#039;s not get ahead of ourselves.  I believe someone already said it, &quot;you haven&#039;t won anything unless you win what really counts.&quot;  And I believe, everyone in this blog knows what I am talking about.  Hope and pray that they don’t have another usual Skins meltdown like they usually do and actually make it fun and interesting, not just for the NFC East but for the NFC altogether.  You should know the division needs it considering how the Eagles and the Cowboys seem to be giving away games of late.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, I am enjoying reading the back and forth banter, but let’s get back to reality for a minute.  Like most have stated here, these rankings do not, let me repeat, do not mean anything at this point, except maybe to hype some fans up (insert Skins fans here).  Yes, the Pack and the Saints are early favorites, especially because they are the two previous Super Bowl winners and they are always in the running, not just on paper, but in the standings.  But for everyone else, even the Giants, which I’m a fan of, the standing does not do anything for them, and it will not bring them to the playoffs or win them the championship.  So for the Skin fans irate about their ranking…. GET OVER IT!!!  Let’s just say, for argument’s sake, if the lowly Eagles beat a good Bills team next week, where should they be in the ranking?  And, if the Eagles then beat the Skins the following week, where should the Skins rank?  Come on, these are weekly rankings, and that’s the only thing they are.  They do not predict who eventually will be in the Super Bowl and who wins it.  And for the Skins fan, just be happy where you are, please get over it and enjoy how your team is playing.  Yes, their quarterback and running back play have really picked up but as far as being contenders, not only this year, but for years to come, AGAIN, let&#8217;s not get ahead of ourselves.  I believe someone already said it, &#8220;you haven&#8217;t won anything unless you win what really counts.&#8221;  And I believe, everyone in this blog knows what I am talking about.  Hope and pray that they don’t have another usual Skins meltdown like they usually do and actually make it fun and interesting, not just for the NFC East but for the NFC altogether.  You should know the division needs it considering how the Eagles and the Cowboys seem to be giving away games of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisnbeckett</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1306029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chrisnbeckett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1306029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REALLY henne would look as good as brady???? What an assine comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REALLY henne would look as good as brady???? What an assine comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puckfillyandduckfallas</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[puckfillyandduckfallas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS has the Redskins ranked 8th and NFL.com has them ranked 10th. This site is a joke. Its not about Grossman or Beck. There running game and defense will keep this team in the top 10. You may not like it, but this team is here to stay in contention. This year, and several years to come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS has the Redskins ranked 8th and NFL.com has them ranked 10th. This site is a joke. Its not about Grossman or Beck. There running game and defense will keep this team in the top 10. You may not like it, but this team is here to stay in contention. This year, and several years to come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean112263</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dean112263]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Packers will have a tough test Sunday night in ATL. The defense has been bending a lot, but making the stops they need to keep them in and win their first 4 games.

Offense has been playing fabulously. Will be interesting if Bulaga and Clifton are healthy enough to play a whole game. That&#039;ll go a long way in showing who&#039;ll win Sunday.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packers will have a tough test Sunday night in ATL. The defense has been bending a lot, but making the stops they need to keep them in and win their first 4 games.</p>
<p>Offense has been playing fabulously. Will be interesting if Bulaga and Clifton are healthy enough to play a whole game. That&#8217;ll go a long way in showing who&#8217;ll win Sunday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And people saying the Giants are average, with the best defensive line in football, and getting healthy bodies back are in need of a lobotomy STAT. We aren&#039;t even hitting our stride on either side of the ball yet and are still getting it done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And people saying the Giants are average, with the best defensive line in football, and getting healthy bodies back are in need of a lobotomy STAT. We aren&#8217;t even hitting our stride on either side of the ball yet and are still getting it done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Skins will finish the season 7-9 and will still be complaining about being ranked too low, while the Giants will be 11-5 and they will still be trying to rest on a FLUKY WEEK ONE GAME WITH HALF THE GIANTS&#039; STARTERS ON IR OR INACTIVE. Goodness gracious knock it off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Skins will finish the season 7-9 and will still be complaining about being ranked too low, while the Giants will be 11-5 and they will still be trying to rest on a FLUKY WEEK ONE GAME WITH HALF THE GIANTS&#8217; STARTERS ON IR OR INACTIVE. Goodness gracious knock it off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 02:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[fringetastic says: Oct 4, 2011 1:55 PM

My only complaint with the list is that the 3-1 Chargers are #7 while the 3-1 Redskins are 17. Same record and both teams have struggled against bad teams, with the Chargers struggling MORE (Vikings, KC; Rams), so why the big difference in ranks?
--------------------

Because the Bolts are just a better team top to bottom and only lost to the Patriots because of Philip Rivers&#039; career-worst game.

The Skins&#039; record hides how poor that team is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fringetastic says: Oct 4, 2011 1:55 PM</p>
<p>My only complaint with the list is that the 3-1 Chargers are #7 while the 3-1 Redskins are 17. Same record and both teams have struggled against bad teams, with the Chargers struggling MORE (Vikings, KC; Rams), so why the big difference in ranks?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Because the Bolts are just a better team top to bottom and only lost to the Patriots because of Philip Rivers&#8217; career-worst game.</p>
<p>The Skins&#8217; record hides how poor that team is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1305112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 01:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1305112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[goawayeverybody says: Oct 4, 2011 10:47 AM

Btw did anyone notice how the officials were actively trying to keep the Steelers in the game? It was truly disgusting. Texans fans know exactly what I’m talking about.

I hate how the officials in this league play favorites with certain teams.
-------------

Giants fan here, but I had that game and yes, I was going ballistic with the way the refs were blatantly cheating for PIT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goawayeverybody says: Oct 4, 2011 10:47 AM</p>
<p>Btw did anyone notice how the officials were actively trying to keep the Steelers in the game? It was truly disgusting. Texans fans know exactly what I’m talking about.</p>
<p>I hate how the officials in this league play favorites with certain teams.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Giants fan here, but I had that game and yes, I was going ballistic with the way the refs were blatantly cheating for PIT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nepatriots128154</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nepatriots128154]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 23:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/lions-hype-teetering-out-of-control/

In this article you guys say the Lions wouldn&#039;t be able to match up with the Ravens or Pats, yet they are ranked higher than both those teams in the Power Rankings. Hmm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/lions-hype-teetering-out-of-control/" rel="nofollow">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/lions-hype-teetering-out-of-control/</a></p>
<p>In this article you guys say the Lions wouldn&#8217;t be able to match up with the Ravens or Pats, yet they are ranked higher than both those teams in the Power Rankings. Hmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axespray</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[axespray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 - 0 Packers vs 10 - 0 Lions

might be the biggest regular season game this year, prime time, division rivals, big name players, good coaching, fans, playoff seeding, etc.

I&#039;m pumped up thinking about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 &#8211; 0 Packers vs 10 &#8211; 0 Lions</p>
<p>might be the biggest regular season game this year, prime time, division rivals, big name players, good coaching, fans, playoff seeding, etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pumped up thinking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304687</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***Giants should be 4th or 5th.

Otherwise, these are solid. I love how you guys are rational about the Skins, even though their fans are NOT. But not doing anything for two decades will lead to delusion amongst that bunch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Giants should be 4th or 5th.</p>
<p>Otherwise, these are solid. I love how you guys are rational about the Skins, even though their fans are NOT. But not doing anything for two decades will lead to delusion amongst that bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Wright 212</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Wright 212]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[goawayeverybody says: Oct 4, 2011 10:43 AM

“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”

Analysis: Norv Turner is a moron.
------------


because AJ gave Sproles away?

Right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goawayeverybody says: Oct 4, 2011 10:43 AM</p>
<p>“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”</p>
<p>Analysis: Norv Turner is a moron.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>because AJ gave Sproles away?</p>
<p>Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: piemasteruk</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[piemasteruk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Ravens are ranked way too high.
 
They will never be a top 10 team until they get a REAL franchise QB to run the offense.&quot;

What, like they did when they won the Superbowl you mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ravens are ranked way too high.</p>
<p>They will never be a top 10 team until they get a REAL franchise QB to run the offense.&#8221;</p>
<p>What, like they did when they won the Superbowl you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suckafree67</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suckafree67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”

sorry Sproles was not worth $6-$7 Mill. a year had the Bolts kept him...1-3 returns for TDs is not worth that amount no matter how you cut it!

and too funny the love Tony Schlomo still gets from fans who think the &#039;Boys should be ranked higher than the top 15!

Really? Dude is a bust, admit it and move on..6 years in the league and 1-2 playoff wins?

Tom Landry would have gotten rid of this bum 2 years ago..

....and cannot forget, Go Bolts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”</p>
<p>sorry Sproles was not worth $6-$7 Mill. a year had the Bolts kept him&#8230;1-3 returns for TDs is not worth that amount no matter how you cut it!</p>
<p>and too funny the love Tony Schlomo still gets from fans who think the &#8216;Boys should be ranked higher than the top 15!</p>
<p>Really? Dude is a bust, admit it and move on..6 years in the league and 1-2 playoff wins?</p>
<p>Tom Landry would have gotten rid of this bum 2 years ago..</p>
<p>&#8230;.and cannot forget, Go Bolts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravensfan4life52</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304230</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ravensfan4life52]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@clintonportisheadd

your parents must be very sad about how stupid you are. i almost feel bad for laughing at how idiotic you are...almost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@clintonportisheadd</p>
<p>your parents must be very sad about how stupid you are. i almost feel bad for laughing at how idiotic you are&#8230;almost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flash1283</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flash1283]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bozosforall says: 
Oct 4, 2011 2:01 PM 



Better defense in Baltimore. And everyone knows that defense wins championships. Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago. And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason. What…it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled? LMAO


----
@bozosforall

Hey dumbass the Patriots beat Baltimore last season!!!!

You must be confused, it was your Steelers that got &quot;pummeled&quot; just a few weeks back by Baltimore.

MORON!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bozosforall says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 2:01 PM </p>
<p>Better defense in Baltimore. And everyone knows that defense wins championships. Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago. And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason. What…it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled? LMAO</p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
@bozosforall</p>
<p>Hey dumbass the Patriots beat Baltimore last season!!!!</p>
<p>You must be confused, it was your Steelers that got &#8220;pummeled&#8221; just a few weeks back by Baltimore.</p>
<p>MORON!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n0hopeleft</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304202</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n0hopeleft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear gassiusclay..   The requirement on this website is that you actually watch football before you post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear gassiusclay..   The requirement on this website is that you actually watch football before you post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southpaw2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southpaw2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richm2256 says: 
Oct 4, 2011 2:33 PM 

Baltimore thrashed the Steelers, then lost to Tennesee, beat the might 0-4 Rams, and looked absolutely pathetic in beating the Yets.

New England got snookered by a very improved 3-1 Bills team, beat the pathetic 0-4 Fins, and turned in solid performances against two strong teams in Oakland and San Diego.

One quality win for the ‘birds against two for the Pats.

------------------------------------------------

Ravens also have given up nearly half as many points as the Patriots have, and also have the largest point differential in the NFL.  Patriots may have an offense that could potentially put 40 points on the board every week, but as we all know a good defense outweighs a good offense.  The Pats&#039; lack of D will come back to haunt them eventually, so the Ravens are rightfully ranked higher than them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richm2256 says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 2:33 PM </p>
<p>Baltimore thrashed the Steelers, then lost to Tennesee, beat the might 0-4 Rams, and looked absolutely pathetic in beating the Yets.</p>
<p>New England got snookered by a very improved 3-1 Bills team, beat the pathetic 0-4 Fins, and turned in solid performances against two strong teams in Oakland and San Diego.</p>
<p>One quality win for the ‘birds against two for the Pats.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Ravens also have given up nearly half as many points as the Patriots have, and also have the largest point differential in the NFL.  Patriots may have an offense that could potentially put 40 points on the board every week, but as we all know a good defense outweighs a good offense.  The Pats&#8217; lack of D will come back to haunt them eventually, so the Ravens are rightfully ranked higher than them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: turbodog1027</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[turbodog1027]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Giants and skins are going nowhere. NFC is ruled by the Saints and Pack, winner of rematch in Jan goes on to Indy. Everybody else is just playing for the bronze]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Giants and skins are going nowhere. NFC is ruled by the Saints and Pack, winner of rematch in Jan goes on to Indy. Everybody else is just playing for the bronze</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucwild05</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bucwild05]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[okay, Lions at 3??  I like the Lions, as I have always liked to see a team that hasn&#039;t done much in the past to do good, however, saying that there are 29 teams that are not better than the Lions is a stetch to say the least.

I love how the Lions are 4-0, and love how the Colts are 0-4, but, I would place Detroit around the 8-9 range... not the 3rd best team in football]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, Lions at 3??  I like the Lions, as I have always liked to see a team that hasn&#8217;t done much in the past to do good, however, saying that there are 29 teams that are not better than the Lions is a stetch to say the least.</p>
<p>I love how the Lions are 4-0, and love how the Colts are 0-4, but, I would place Detroit around the 8-9 range&#8230; not the 3rd best team in football</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richm2256</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304129</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richm2256]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis says: 
Oct 4, 2011 2:24 PM 
Sorry that was for bozosforall



Sorry, saw this after I posted the above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PFTiswhatitis says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 2:24 PM<br />
Sorry that was for bozosforall</p>
<p>Sorry, saw this after I posted the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richm2256</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richm2256]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis says: 
Oct 4, 2011 2:24 PM 
@richm2256: it was 2 seasons ago. If you are going to talk smack at least get your facts straight loser. I hate to disappoint you but there is no way the Ravens get by any of the top teams. Not with Flacco running that offense.

---------------------------------------------------------------
What, exactly, was two seasons ago? Try making a little sense, Bunkie.

I stood up for the 4-0 Packers over the 4-0 Lions, the Lions over the 3-1 Saints, and the 3-1 Patriots over the 3-1 Ravens.

What facts did I not get straight?


richm2256 says: 
Oct 4, 2011 12:44 PM 
No problem putting GB over Detroit, but you have seriously got to get over your crush for the Saints. Detroit deserves #2.

New Orleans at 3-1 has the same record as several other teams, and two of those wins were over the Jags and Chicago.

Seriously.

And the Ravens over the Pat’s????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PFTiswhatitis says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 2:24 PM<br />
@richm2256: it was 2 seasons ago. If you are going to talk smack at least get your facts straight loser. I hate to disappoint you but there is no way the Ravens get by any of the top teams. Not with Flacco running that offense.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
What, exactly, was two seasons ago? Try making a little sense, Bunkie.</p>
<p>I stood up for the 4-0 Packers over the 4-0 Lions, the Lions over the 3-1 Saints, and the 3-1 Patriots over the 3-1 Ravens.</p>
<p>What facts did I not get straight?</p>
<p>richm2256 says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 12:44 PM<br />
No problem putting GB over Detroit, but you have seriously got to get over your crush for the Saints. Detroit deserves #2.</p>
<p>New Orleans at 3-1 has the same record as several other teams, and two of those wins were over the Jags and Chicago.</p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>And the Ravens over the Pat’s????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richm2256</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richm2256]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bozosforall says: 
Better defense in Baltimore. And everyone knows that defense wins championships. Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago. And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason. What…it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled? LMAO

----------------------------------------------------------------
Well, well, well ....... look who&#039;s back.

And I was getting worried about the shortage of morons here?

Bozo, I&#039;m fine when any team kick&#039;s the Patriot&#039;s a$$, but the examples you gave are from PREVIOUS seasons. The Power Rankings are for THIS season.

And THIS season the Patriots, despite the NFL&#039;s worst defense, have definitely out-performed the Ravens.

Baltimore thrashed the Steelers, then lost to Tennesee, beat the might 0-4 Rams, and looked absolutely pathetic in beating the Yets.

New England got snookered by a very improved 3-1 Bills team, beat the pathetic 0-4 Fins, and turned in solid performances against two strong teams in Oakland and San Diego.

One quality win for the &#039;birds against two for the Pats.

Let&#039;s not even talk about your beloved 2-2 Yets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bozosforall says:<br />
Better defense in Baltimore. And everyone knows that defense wins championships. Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago. And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason. What…it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled? LMAO</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Well, well, well &#8230;&#8230;. look who&#8217;s back.</p>
<p>And I was getting worried about the shortage of morons here?</p>
<p>Bozo, I&#8217;m fine when any team kick&#8217;s the Patriot&#8217;s a$$, but the examples you gave are from PREVIOUS seasons. The Power Rankings are for THIS season.</p>
<p>And THIS season the Patriots, despite the NFL&#8217;s worst defense, have definitely out-performed the Ravens.</p>
<p>Baltimore thrashed the Steelers, then lost to Tennesee, beat the might 0-4 Rams, and looked absolutely pathetic in beating the Yets.</p>
<p>New England got snookered by a very improved 3-1 Bills team, beat the pathetic 0-4 Fins, and turned in solid performances against two strong teams in Oakland and San Diego.</p>
<p>One quality win for the &#8216;birds against two for the Pats.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not even talk about your beloved 2-2 Yets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southpaw2k</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[southpaw2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gassiusclay says: 
Oct 4, 2011 1:38 PM 
NYG are #9????? are you out of your freaking mind? What games have you been watching? We [Redskins] beat the crap out of them…granted their D-Line was hurt, but their secondary wasn’t, nor were anyone on Offense. 

BTW, I am good with up being down @ 17, but you have the Cowboys ranked under us? They beat us.

Who the hell made this list?

----------------------------------------------

Staff writers at ProFootballTalk.com made this list - note the website you had logged into.

And while you may have a point about that the Redskins should be ranked higher than the Giants, I also think the Cowboys deserve to be ranked under you.  They are completely impossible to determine who they are.  They could be one of the top five teams in the league, but definitely not consistently.  Power rankings aren&#039;t just about who beat who, it&#039;s based on who *CAN* beat who.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gassiusclay says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 1:38 PM<br />
NYG are #9????? are you out of your freaking mind? What games have you been watching? We [Redskins] beat the crap out of them…granted their D-Line was hurt, but their secondary wasn’t, nor were anyone on Offense. </p>
<p>BTW, I am good with up being down @ 17, but you have the Cowboys ranked under us? They beat us.</p>
<p>Who the hell made this list?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Staff writers at ProFootballTalk.com made this list &#8211; note the website you had logged into.</p>
<p>And while you may have a point about that the Redskins should be ranked higher than the Giants, I also think the Cowboys deserve to be ranked under you.  They are completely impossible to determine who they are.  They could be one of the top five teams in the league, but definitely not consistently.  Power rankings aren&#8217;t just about who beat who, it&#8217;s based on who *CAN* beat who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFTiswhatitis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry that was for bozosforall]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry that was for bozosforall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PFTiswhatitis</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PFTiswhatitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@richm2256: it was 2 seasons ago.  If you are going to talk smack at least get your facts straight loser.  I hate to disappoint you but there is no way the Ravens get by any of the top teams.  Not with Flacco running that offense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@richm2256: it was 2 seasons ago.  If you are going to talk smack at least get your facts straight loser.  I hate to disappoint you but there is no way the Ravens get by any of the top teams.  Not with Flacco running that offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodgray39</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodgray39]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20 is the right place for the Panthers. With injuries to key defensive players Beason and Davis, the Panthers have been in every game this season. 1-3 at the quarter pole is damn good for a team with the toughest schedule in the league.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 is the right place for the Panthers. With injuries to key defensive players Beason and Davis, the Panthers have been in every game this season. 1-3 at the quarter pole is damn good for a team with the toughest schedule in the league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1304000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1304000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richm2256 says: 
Oct 4, 2011 12:44 PM 
No problem putting GB over Detroit, but you have seriously got to get over your crush for the Saints. Detroit deserves #2.

New Orleans at 3-1 has the same record as several other teams, and two of those wins were over the Jags and Chicago.

Seriously.

And the Ravens over the Pat’s????

__
Better defense in Baltimore.  And everyone knows that defense wins championships.  Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago.  And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason.  What...it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled?  LMAO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richm2256 says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 12:44 PM<br />
No problem putting GB over Detroit, but you have seriously got to get over your crush for the Saints. Detroit deserves #2.</p>
<p>New Orleans at 3-1 has the same record as several other teams, and two of those wins were over the Jags and Chicago.</p>
<p>Seriously.</p>
<p>And the Ravens over the Pat’s????</p>
<p>__<br />
Better defense in Baltimore.  And everyone knows that defense wins championships.  Just look at what the Giants did to the vaunted Pats offense in the Super Bowl just a few short years ago.  And what the Ravens D did to the Pats just last postseason.  What&#8230;it pains you to remember how your team got pummeled?  LMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/04/week-four-power-rankings-2/#comment-1303990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=158571#comment-1303990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[goawayeverybody says: 
Oct 4, 2011 10:43 AM 
“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”

Analysis: Norv Turner is a moron.

__
More like:   A.J. &quot;The Lord of No Rings&quot; Smith is a moron.  After all, not only is he in charge of player acquisitions, releases and trades, but he also hired Norv in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goawayeverybody says:<br />
Oct 4, 2011 10:43 AM<br />
“In Darren Sproles, they have the steal of the 2011 free-agency class.”</p>
<p>Analysis: Norv Turner is a moron.</p>
<p>__<br />
More like:   A.J. &#8220;The Lord of No Rings&#8221; Smith is a moron.  After all, not only is he in charge of player acquisitions, releases and trades, but he also hired Norv in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
