<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rams gave up conditional sixth-round pick for Lloyd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgstriker</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1332138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jgstriker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1332138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we give up practically our only talent on offense other than maybe Tebow or Eddie Royal for a 6th round pick? What???? Any comments?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we give up practically our only talent on offense other than maybe Tebow or Eddie Royal for a 6th round pick? What???? Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jebdamone</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jebdamone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow...for a conditional sixth rounder?  did they at least throw in a bowl of clam chowder too?  how were there not more teams (vikings) looking to make a play at this guy?  sammie is going to love lloyd.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230;for a conditional sixth rounder?  did they at least throw in a bowl of clam chowder too?  how were there not more teams (vikings) looking to make a play at this guy?  sammie is going to love lloyd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjstyles</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tjstyles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Denver gives up that for a 5th rounder, I wonder what they’ll give up for a 4th rounder?&quot;

What do they have left to trade?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Denver gives up that for a 5th rounder, I wonder what they’ll give up for a 4th rounder?&#8221;</p>
<p>What do they have left to trade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thespeaker08</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thespeaker08]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WOW

A real steal. 

If I were Pat Bowlen, i&#039;d give away a second rounder and Champ Bailey with John Fox just to convince someone to take Fox just off my hands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW</p>
<p>A real steal. </p>
<p>If I were Pat Bowlen, i&#8217;d give away a second rounder and Champ Bailey with John Fox just to convince someone to take Fox just off my hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broncofanatic7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broncofanatic7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@capslockkey
I never said he was going to be 3X the WR that Lloyd ever was... But let us all remember. Lloyd is a WR that was a journey man for 8 years before he finally started producing in the NFL. He&#039;s now 31 years old. And Demaryius Thomas has a lot of upside to him, he&#039;s taken time to get healthy and now it&#039;s time for him to play and show us what he can do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@capslockkey<br />
I never said he was going to be 3X the WR that Lloyd ever was&#8230; But let us all remember. Lloyd is a WR that was a journey man for 8 years before he finally started producing in the NFL. He&#8217;s now 31 years old. And Demaryius Thomas has a lot of upside to him, he&#8217;s taken time to get healthy and now it&#8217;s time for him to play and show us what he can do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will447</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[will447]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They are doing everything they can to stay in the Suck for Luck race.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are doing everything they can to stay in the Suck for Luck race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homelanddefense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[homelanddefense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow, I bet a lot of fans are pissed that their team didnt give up a  6th for the guy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, I bet a lot of fans are pissed that their team didnt give up a  6th for the guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capslockkey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capslockkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Broncofanatic7

People forgot about Demaryius Thomas because the guy spends more time in the tub than on the field.  Hell, he was even injured when the Broncos drafted him.  I think it&#039;s funny that someone claims he&#039;s 3X the receiver Lloyd is when he&#039;s accomplished next to nothing at the NFL level so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Broncofanatic7</p>
<p>People forgot about Demaryius Thomas because the guy spends more time in the tub than on the field.  Hell, he was even injured when the Broncos drafted him.  I think it&#8217;s funny that someone claims he&#8217;s 3X the receiver Lloyd is when he&#8217;s accomplished next to nothing at the NFL level so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bignubba</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bignubba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[denverdave3 says:
Oct 17, 2011 2:34 PM
“gnubba says: Oct 17, 2011 2:02 PM

Why would Denver even bother with this?!

A) It sets Tebow up for failure

B) Wouldn’t they have received a 5th rounder as a compensatory draft pick anyway? (which the Rams will now get, essentially getting Lloyd for free)

Unbelievable, the Broncos essentially gave him away. Someone clue me in, what am I missing here?!”

okay let me ‘splain it to ya. For starters the Rams are going nowhere so the pick will be only a few spots out of the 4th round. Next, he has only had one good year out of 9. Then there the fact that his contract is up in 3 months, then he will want top dollar for the few years he has left. Meanwhile the Broncs have good young talent (Cheaper) on the team and practice squad. Those players can realte to Tebow better than LLoyd and it is clear the Broncs want to get younger. Finally whoever the early 5th round pick is has a good chance of making this team and giving the Broncs 6-8 years of service. To put it another way the Pats have been proving for years that certain players are more valuable on the trading block than they are on field for a dozen games. Such is the case here. It’s as simple as that.

------------------------------
Wow. Thank you for rewording my point, while adding the Brandon Lloyd bio all of us already know.  I sure feel &quot;schooled&quot; 

So again, instead of using him for the rest of this year to at least attempt to win some games, we let him go for the same draft pick we&#039;d be getting when he leaves at the end of the year? Oh I forgot, THIS pick, MIGHT be a FEW spots higher. 

Yeah, definitely seems like a great move. Considering the Broncos WR group and their injury history (looking at you, D. Thomas) they shoulda kept him]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>denverdave3 says:<br />
Oct 17, 2011 2:34 PM<br />
“gnubba says: Oct 17, 2011 2:02 PM</p>
<p>Why would Denver even bother with this?!</p>
<p>A) It sets Tebow up for failure</p>
<p>B) Wouldn’t they have received a 5th rounder as a compensatory draft pick anyway? (which the Rams will now get, essentially getting Lloyd for free)</p>
<p>Unbelievable, the Broncos essentially gave him away. Someone clue me in, what am I missing here?!”</p>
<p>okay let me ‘splain it to ya. For starters the Rams are going nowhere so the pick will be only a few spots out of the 4th round. Next, he has only had one good year out of 9. Then there the fact that his contract is up in 3 months, then he will want top dollar for the few years he has left. Meanwhile the Broncs have good young talent (Cheaper) on the team and practice squad. Those players can realte to Tebow better than LLoyd and it is clear the Broncs want to get younger. Finally whoever the early 5th round pick is has a good chance of making this team and giving the Broncs 6-8 years of service. To put it another way the Pats have been proving for years that certain players are more valuable on the trading block than they are on field for a dozen games. Such is the case here. It’s as simple as that.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Wow. Thank you for rewording my point, while adding the Brandon Lloyd bio all of us already know.  I sure feel &#8220;schooled&#8221; </p>
<p>So again, instead of using him for the rest of this year to at least attempt to win some games, we let him go for the same draft pick we&#8217;d be getting when he leaves at the end of the year? Oh I forgot, THIS pick, MIGHT be a FEW spots higher. </p>
<p>Yeah, definitely seems like a great move. Considering the Broncos WR group and their injury history (looking at you, D. Thomas) they shoulda kept him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broncofanatic7</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Broncofanatic7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@capslockkey
That is the equivalent to that at all. Everyone has just forgotten about Demaryius Thomas because he&#039;s been injured. But now that he&#039;s back, it&#039;s a solid reviever joinging back in the depth chart. Thomas is going to be a beast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@capslockkey<br />
That is the equivalent to that at all. Everyone has just forgotten about Demaryius Thomas because he&#8217;s been injured. But now that he&#8217;s back, it&#8217;s a solid reviever joinging back in the depth chart. Thomas is going to be a beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: capslockkey</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1331004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[capslockkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1331004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Demaryius Thomas is back. If he stays healthy he will be 3x’s the receiver Lloyd is. So, no the Broncos did not get rid of their #1 WR, he’s just been injured.
&quot;&lt;/i&gt;


That&#039;s the equivalent of saying, trading Peyton Hillis away for essentially nothing makes sense since they have Knowshon Moreno.  How did that work out by the way?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Demaryius Thomas is back. If he stays healthy he will be 3x’s the receiver Lloyd is. So, no the Broncos did not get rid of their #1 WR, he’s just been injured.<br />
&#8220;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the equivalent of saying, trading Peyton Hillis away for essentially nothing makes sense since they have Knowshon Moreno.  How did that work out by the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santolonius</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[santolonius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[conspiracy theory... 1) the trade gives tebow a steeper mountain to climb so it is more likely that at year end they can say, &quot;well we gave him a shot but he ain&#039;t cut out for this&quot; and 2) the trade and more like it gives them a better chance of going 1-15 and doing the old &quot;suck for luck&quot; shuffle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>conspiracy theory&#8230; 1) the trade gives tebow a steeper mountain to climb so it is more likely that at year end they can say, &#8220;well we gave him a shot but he ain&#8217;t cut out for this&#8221; and 2) the trade and more like it gives them a better chance of going 1-15 and doing the old &#8220;suck for luck&#8221; shuffle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingkreg12</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kingkreg12]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this move a lot for the Rams. How often does a 6th round pick turn into a Colston, Brady or Portis? Answer is one in maybe 500 of them. Lloyd will thrive in this offense with Mc D and Sammy. I just hope they can show the organization enough to keep them from cleaning house in the offseason.

Lloyd may not come close to what he did last season ever again, but thinking that he can&#039;t put up 1000 yds in this offense is a lapse of judgement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this move a lot for the Rams. How often does a 6th round pick turn into a Colston, Brady or Portis? Answer is one in maybe 500 of them. Lloyd will thrive in this offense with Mc D and Sammy. I just hope they can show the organization enough to keep them from cleaning house in the offseason.</p>
<p>Lloyd may not come close to what he did last season ever again, but thinking that he can&#8217;t put up 1000 yds in this offense is a lapse of judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bing253</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bing253]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Seahawks got a higher pick for Deion Branch last year (4th)  than the Broncos got for last years leading receiving? The Broncos didn&#039;t do a good job on this one they should have got at least a 4th or a couple middle/late round picks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Seahawks got a higher pick for Deion Branch last year (4th)  than the Broncos got for last years leading receiving? The Broncos didn&#8217;t do a good job on this one they should have got at least a 4th or a couple middle/late round picks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docboss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[docboss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless Lloyd can play on the offensive line, the &quot;upgrade&quot; is moot. How can Lloyd catch a ball while Bradford is on the ground? Is this just an attempt by Billy to save his job by winning three games this season?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Lloyd can play on the offensive line, the &#8220;upgrade&#8221; is moot. How can Lloyd catch a ball while Bradford is on the ground? Is this just an attempt by Billy to save his job by winning three games this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbk1000</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbk1000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[umm, which round was Brady drafted again?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm, which round was Brady drafted again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7pints</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[7pints]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demaryius Thomas is back.  If he stays healthy he will be 3x&#039;s the receiver Lloyd is.  So, no the Broncos did not get rid of their #1 WR, he&#039;s just been injured.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demaryius Thomas is back.  If he stays healthy he will be 3x&#8217;s the receiver Lloyd is.  So, no the Broncos did not get rid of their #1 WR, he&#8217;s just been injured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fissels</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fissels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thats it? a 6th rounder? Thats all?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats it? a 6th rounder? Thats all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwisnasky</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bwisnasky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Land Snark says:
Oct 17, 2011 2:04 PM
Broncos are getting fleeced again because of a regime change.

Hopefully Fox and Elway know what they’re doing.


-----------------------------------------------

They know exactly what they are doing... they are setting up their Suck for Luck campaign in full force... and right now St. Louis is ahead of them... why not try to help the Rams win a couple of games so they can move up in the draft order?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Land Snark says:<br />
Oct 17, 2011 2:04 PM<br />
Broncos are getting fleeced again because of a regime change.</p>
<p>Hopefully Fox and Elway know what they’re doing.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>They know exactly what they are doing&#8230; they are setting up their Suck for Luck campaign in full force&#8230; and right now St. Louis is ahead of them&#8230; why not try to help the Rams win a couple of games so they can move up in the draft order?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dafixisin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dafixisin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow... now all they have to do is reunite Eddie Royal with Cutler for a 7th rounder and eliminate any deep threat whatsoever!  

And as a Raiders fan... hooray!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; now all they have to do is reunite Eddie Royal with Cutler for a 7th rounder and eliminate any deep threat whatsoever!  </p>
<p>And as a Raiders fan&#8230; hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denverdave3</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330897</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[denverdave3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;gnubba says: Oct 17, 2011 2:02 PM

Why would Denver even bother with this?!

A) It sets Tebow up for failure

B) Wouldn’t they have received a 5th rounder as a compensatory draft pick anyway? (which the Rams will now get, essentially getting Lloyd for free)

Unbelievable, the Broncos essentially gave him away. Someone clue me in, what am I missing here?!&quot; 

okay let me &#039;splain it to ya. For starters the Rams are going nowhere so the pick will be only a few spots out of the 4th round.  Next, he has only had one good year out of 9. Then there the fact that his contract is up in 3 months, then he will want top dollar for the few years he has left. Meanwhile the Broncs have good young talent (Cheaper) on the team and practice squad. Those players can realte to Tebow better than LLoyd and it is clear the Broncs want to get younger. Finally whoever the early 5th round pick is has a good chance of making this team and giving the Broncs  6-8 years of service.  To put it another way the Pats have been proving for years that certain players are more valuable on the trading block than they are on field for a dozen games. Such is the case here.  It&#039;s as simple as that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;gnubba says: Oct 17, 2011 2:02 PM</p>
<p>Why would Denver even bother with this?!</p>
<p>A) It sets Tebow up for failure</p>
<p>B) Wouldn’t they have received a 5th rounder as a compensatory draft pick anyway? (which the Rams will now get, essentially getting Lloyd for free)</p>
<p>Unbelievable, the Broncos essentially gave him away. Someone clue me in, what am I missing here?!&#8221; </p>
<p>okay let me &#8216;splain it to ya. For starters the Rams are going nowhere so the pick will be only a few spots out of the 4th round.  Next, he has only had one good year out of 9. Then there the fact that his contract is up in 3 months, then he will want top dollar for the few years he has left. Meanwhile the Broncs have good young talent (Cheaper) on the team and practice squad. Those players can realte to Tebow better than LLoyd and it is clear the Broncs want to get younger. Finally whoever the early 5th round pick is has a good chance of making this team and giving the Broncs  6-8 years of service.  To put it another way the Pats have been proving for years that certain players are more valuable on the trading block than they are on field for a dozen games. Such is the case here.  It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hendeeze</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hendeeze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Denver take solace that your 5th is actually a really really low 4th.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denver take solace that your 5th is actually a really really low 4th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sweetnlow44</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330875</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sweetnlow44]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Denver is stupid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Denver is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: universalcynic</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[universalcynic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brandon had a great season lat year. So far this year he and I have the same amount of TDs for the Broncos. 

I love how people devalue a draft pick as if it were a breath mint or something. A conditional 5th is pretty valuable when you have holes all over the roster to fill. 

This front office is still pickup up the pieces from the Josh McFratboy era. They gave it a go with what was left from his version of an NFL roster and are now blowing it up. I don&#039;t blame them. 

The Broncos (even with Lloyd) were an average team at best. Now they don&#039;t have to overpay a vet WR next year and can get younger with an extra pick. 

STL...good luck with all of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon had a great season lat year. So far this year he and I have the same amount of TDs for the Broncos. </p>
<p>I love how people devalue a draft pick as if it were a breath mint or something. A conditional 5th is pretty valuable when you have holes all over the roster to fill. </p>
<p>This front office is still pickup up the pieces from the Josh McFratboy era. They gave it a go with what was left from his version of an NFL roster and are now blowing it up. I don&#8217;t blame them. </p>
<p>The Broncos (even with Lloyd) were an average team at best. Now they don&#8217;t have to overpay a vet WR next year and can get younger with an extra pick. </p>
<p>STL&#8230;good luck with all of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allascowboys</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[allascowboys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is that Nick Cannon?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that Nick Cannon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoknowsnothing</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whoknowsnothing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now I can pickup Lloyd and start him on my fantasy team.

His stats for 2010 season:
REC-77 
YDS-1448  
TD&#039;s-11 

Denver gives up that for a 5th rounder, I wonder what they&#039;ll give up for a 4th rounder?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I can pickup Lloyd and start him on my fantasy team.</p>
<p>His stats for 2010 season:<br />
REC-77<br />
YDS-1448<br />
TD&#8217;s-11 </p>
<p>Denver gives up that for a 5th rounder, I wonder what they&#8217;ll give up for a 4th rounder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wasteindustries</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wasteindustries]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teams are getting tighter about trading picks now a days so couldn&#039;t really see anyone giving a 4th rounder or higher for a free agent to be]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teams are getting tighter about trading picks now a days so couldn&#8217;t really see anyone giving a 4th rounder or higher for a free agent to be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acanniv</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[acanniv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, this just seems like a terrible trade for the Broncos.  Wouldn&#039;t they have gotten a comparable compensatory pick if he would&#039;ve just left after the season?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this just seems like a terrible trade for the Broncos.  Wouldn&#8217;t they have gotten a comparable compensatory pick if he would&#8217;ve just left after the season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mogogo1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mogogo1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s truth to the &quot;get something now rather than nothing later&quot; argument, but this is AWFULLY close to nothing. 

Interestingly enough, as they conduct this extended audition of Tim Tebow at quarterback, they&#039;ll do so with a really thin corps of wideouts.  After trading up in the first round to select him, you&#039;d think they&#039;d be interested in seeing if he can actually play.  But their line stinks, their running game is still lousy, and now they have nobody of note at WR except for Decker (who&#039;ll draw tighter coverage with Lloyd being gone). I&#039;ve never been a real believer in Tebow, but it&#039;s hard to see how they&#039;re giving him much of  a chance to succeed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s truth to the &#8220;get something now rather than nothing later&#8221; argument, but this is AWFULLY close to nothing. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough, as they conduct this extended audition of Tim Tebow at quarterback, they&#8217;ll do so with a really thin corps of wideouts.  After trading up in the first round to select him, you&#8217;d think they&#8217;d be interested in seeing if he can actually play.  But their line stinks, their running game is still lousy, and now they have nobody of note at WR except for Decker (who&#8217;ll draw tighter coverage with Lloyd being gone). I&#8217;ve never been a real believer in Tebow, but it&#8217;s hard to see how they&#8217;re giving him much of  a chance to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suckleague</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/17/rams-gave-up-conditional-sixth-round-pick-for-lloyd/#comment-1330791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[suckleague]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=161226#comment-1330791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s something. Man that team needs help. Thank you captain obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s something. Man that team needs help. Thank you captain obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
