<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 62 pickup: Saints have night to remember</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: goawayeverybody</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1346984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goawayeverybody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1346984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;third least important&quot;

I hate to break this to you, but in a field of three, the third least important running back is the most important.  Did you mean &quot;third most important&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;third least important&#8221;</p>
<p>I hate to break this to you, but in a field of three, the third least important running back is the most important.  Did you mean &#8220;third most important&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacktumlinson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1346803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jacktumlinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 22:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1346803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rpiotr01 says:Oct 24, 2011 8:16 AM 

Why was Peyton having Brees sling it the entire game? Bad juju for teams to run up the score like that

Guess Peyton did that to show how horrible the Colts are without him. But somehow I doubt he called any of the Saints plays. PAYTON, who is the Saints coach and not the Colts quarterback, didn&#039;t call any of the plays either. That was our offensive cordinator who called the plays. And the weird part is that this is the first game he has ever called plays in a game. If PAYTON would have called plays it would have been a higher score somehow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rpiotr01 says:Oct 24, 2011 8:16 AM </p>
<p>Why was Peyton having Brees sling it the entire game? Bad juju for teams to run up the score like that</p>
<p>Guess Peyton did that to show how horrible the Colts are without him. But somehow I doubt he called any of the Saints plays. PAYTON, who is the Saints coach and not the Colts quarterback, didn&#8217;t call any of the plays either. That was our offensive cordinator who called the plays. And the weird part is that this is the first game he has ever called plays in a game. If PAYTON would have called plays it would have been a higher score somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dukemarc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1346251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dukemarc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1346251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stay classy &#039;Aints, just like your gimpy coach....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay classy &#8216;Aints, just like your gimpy coach&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: materialman80</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1346134</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[materialman80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1346134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, it&#039;s the Colts and they suck, but the Saints were really clicking last night! If I was Manning, I would never come back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, it&#8217;s the Colts and they suck, but the Saints were really clicking last night! If I was Manning, I would never come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 46defense</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[46defense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn;t the Jaguars score 62 in the playoffs in the late 90&#039;s early 00&#039;s?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn;t the Jaguars score 62 in the playoffs in the late 90&#8242;s early 00&#8242;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chas88</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chas88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if Peyton was playing, the Saints still would have put up 62 points. Sure, the Colt&#039;s score probably would have been higher, but it doesn&#039;t mean anything when your defense can&#039;t stop anyone. Peyton only masked the Colt&#039;s huge, glaring problems. With or without him this year, the Colts still wouldn&#039;t have been very good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if Peyton was playing, the Saints still would have put up 62 points. Sure, the Colt&#8217;s score probably would have been higher, but it doesn&#8217;t mean anything when your defense can&#8217;t stop anyone. Peyton only masked the Colt&#8217;s huge, glaring problems. With or without him this year, the Colts still wouldn&#8217;t have been very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[musicman495 - your 10:44 post

good one. Thanks. 

It&#039;s the job of the offense to score, it&#039;s the job of the defense to stop them. 

That&#039;s why they get the big bux.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>musicman495 &#8211; your 10:44 post</p>
<p>good one. Thanks. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the job of the offense to score, it&#8217;s the job of the defense to stop them. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why they get the big bux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1historian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1historian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this game was the long overdue kharmic payback for the irsay family. And from the looks of it&#039;s just the beginning, and in that (almost) brand new $1,000,000,000 + indoor stadium the irony is delicious. 

This game is on the record of the indianapolis colts. It is NOT on the record of the BALTIMORE COLTS. 

Mr. Manning - I say this out of respect - please hang it up NOW. At your age and with your family medical history you should NOT play any more. You don&#039;t owe the fans anything, you don&#039;t owe the irsay family anything, but you do owe YOUR family a husband and father who can walk around.

I (and millions of other fans) would HATE to see you sitting in a wheelchair when you deliver your HOF acceptance speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this game was the long overdue kharmic payback for the irsay family. And from the looks of it&#8217;s just the beginning, and in that (almost) brand new $1,000,000,000 + indoor stadium the irony is delicious. </p>
<p>This game is on the record of the indianapolis colts. It is NOT on the record of the BALTIMORE COLTS. </p>
<p>Mr. Manning &#8211; I say this out of respect &#8211; please hang it up NOW. At your age and with your family medical history you should NOT play any more. You don&#8217;t owe the fans anything, you don&#8217;t owe the irsay family anything, but you do owe YOUR family a husband and father who can walk around.</p>
<p>I (and millions of other fans) would HATE to see you sitting in a wheelchair when you deliver your HOF acceptance speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ejrunabout</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ejrunabout]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess the Saints could have instructed the running backs in 4th quarter to just walk or skip, but absolutely no running.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the Saints could have instructed the running backs in 4th quarter to just walk or skip, but absolutely no running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicman495</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musicman495]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CaJonMcChicken says: Oct 24, 2011 1:04 AM

Was it just me or did it seem like the Saints were running the score up on the Colts?
----------------------------------------
It was just you.  Brees sat out the whole fourth quarter, and they rarely if ever called a pass play after that.  You can&#039;t blame the Saints that the Colts can&#039;t stop anybody.

Saints ran over the Colts like a Mayflower van in the middle of the night.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CaJonMcChicken says: Oct 24, 2011 1:04 AM</p>
<p>Was it just me or did it seem like the Saints were running the score up on the Colts?<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
It was just you.  Brees sat out the whole fourth quarter, and they rarely if ever called a pass play after that.  You can&#8217;t blame the Saints that the Colts can&#8217;t stop anybody.</p>
<p>Saints ran over the Colts like a Mayflower van in the middle of the night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philyeagles5</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[philyeagles5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thats weird. i had no idea Peyton played defense too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats weird. i had no idea Peyton played defense too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20bust11</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[20bust11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At this point I’m just glad that the Patriots are in the AFC. The Saints and Packers can score a ton of points but the Packers are a monster and I don’t see anybody in the NFC beating them in the postseason including the Saints.

The Saints were outplayed by the Packers in their 1st game of the season, at Lambeau, and still had a shot at winning that game. They were in scoring position, but came up 1 play short. The Saints defense is clearly improving, and with their offense doing whatever they want, whenever they want, I doubt the Packers are happy they&#039;re in the NFC. The Tampa game, in Tampa, was won by the referees. Between non-calls, and terrible calls, Tampa was literally handed a gift. Anyone who saw that game knows that. The Saints play Tampa again in 2 weeks. They will meet Green Bay again at the end of the season. They will get to rectify both losses. If the Saints are fortunate, they will get to play the worst defense in the NFL, in Indianapolis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point I’m just glad that the Patriots are in the AFC. The Saints and Packers can score a ton of points but the Packers are a monster and I don’t see anybody in the NFC beating them in the postseason including the Saints.</p>
<p>The Saints were outplayed by the Packers in their 1st game of the season, at Lambeau, and still had a shot at winning that game. They were in scoring position, but came up 1 play short. The Saints defense is clearly improving, and with their offense doing whatever they want, whenever they want, I doubt the Packers are happy they&#8217;re in the NFC. The Tampa game, in Tampa, was won by the referees. Between non-calls, and terrible calls, Tampa was literally handed a gift. Anyone who saw that game knows that. The Saints play Tampa again in 2 weeks. They will meet Green Bay again at the end of the season. They will get to rectify both losses. If the Saints are fortunate, they will get to play the worst defense in the NFL, in Indianapolis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spharrgcs</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spharrgcs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing at all was gained by subjecting the general public to a public flogging such as what the Saints did to a pitiful and embarrassing Colts team.  NBC will definitely want to revisit the flex option and try to foresee a mismatch like that a little bit sooner in the season.  There were plenty of better games on the table for such a high-ratings program to showcase.  I&#039;m sure baseball was happy though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing at all was gained by subjecting the general public to a public flogging such as what the Saints did to a pitiful and embarrassing Colts team.  NBC will definitely want to revisit the flex option and try to foresee a mismatch like that a little bit sooner in the season.  There were plenty of better games on the table for such a high-ratings program to showcase.  I&#8217;m sure baseball was happy though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polishrod</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polishrod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mmcdan13 says: 
Oct 24, 2011 5:52 AM 
damnyoulinelliot says:Oct 24, 2011 12:01 AM 

Hey NBC, please work it out in 2012 somehow where flex scheduling starts earlier in the year. K? thnx

——————————————————-
Why, so we could have gotten the Titans-Texans game for first place in the AFC South, and another beatdown. No guarantees, you can only hope for the best.

---------------------

At least that game meant something.  This game was a dog from the minute Peyton went down]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mmcdan13 says:<br />
Oct 24, 2011 5:52 AM<br />
damnyoulinelliot says:Oct 24, 2011 12:01 AM </p>
<p>Hey NBC, please work it out in 2012 somehow where flex scheduling starts earlier in the year. K? thnx</p>
<p>——————————————————-<br />
Why, so we could have gotten the Titans-Texans game for first place in the AFC South, and another beatdown. No guarantees, you can only hope for the best.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>At least that game meant something.  This game was a dog from the minute Peyton went down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BernardPollardIsAnAss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BernardPollardIsAnAss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@belicheckyoself

Could not agree more.  I love it when haters are to stupid to be consistent enough to at least mask their hate on some level.  Frauds.  Patriots hating frauds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@belicheckyoself</p>
<p>Could not agree more.  I love it when haters are to stupid to be consistent enough to at least mask their hate on some level.  Frauds.  Patriots hating frauds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woodyc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[woodyc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 13:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s keep this game in perspective; the Colts are awful this year without Peyton Manning.  Come back and talk to us when the Saints can put a spanking like this on a good team like the Packers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s keep this game in perspective; the Colts are awful this year without Peyton Manning.  Come back and talk to us when the Saints can put a spanking like this on a good team like the Packers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpiotr01</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rpiotr01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why was Peyton having Brees sling it the entire game? Bad juju for teams to run up the score like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was Peyton having Brees sling it the entire game? Bad juju for teams to run up the score like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nesuperfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nesuperfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the record, I don&#039;t have any problems with the score, or &quot;running it up&quot;, despite the negative connotations some people attach to that phrase.

I think they just played hard to 3 quarters, and because the score was so out of reach, only then did they let up. It really is to be expected that a pro team would not stop playing after the half.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I don&#8217;t have any problems with the score, or &#8220;running it up&#8221;, despite the negative connotations some people attach to that phrase.</p>
<p>I think they just played hard to 3 quarters, and because the score was so out of reach, only then did they let up. It really is to be expected that a pro team would not stop playing after the half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nesuperfan</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nesuperfan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[descendency says:Oct 23, 2011 11:48 PM 

I was really hoping for 70. or a record 73.
__________________________________

There have been a few games over the years, where a number of teams could have beaten this record, and last night was one of them. Despite the score, they choose not to run it up even more.

Had they kept Brees in there for another quarter, and kept throwing, does anyone believe they would not have passed 73 points?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>descendency says:Oct 23, 2011 11:48 PM </p>
<p>I was really hoping for 70. or a record 73.<br />
__________________________________</p>
<p>There have been a few games over the years, where a number of teams could have beaten this record, and last night was one of them. Despite the score, they choose not to run it up even more.</p>
<p>Had they kept Brees in there for another quarter, and kept throwing, does anyone believe they would not have passed 73 points?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drednot</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drednot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How come none of these &quot;talking heads&quot; aren&#039;t talking about this game? If the Patriots, Saints, Jets, Steelers (we did when the Ravens hammered them) or Packers lost this bad we&#039;d hear it for a month!! I understand no Manning, but he doesn&#039;t play D.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come none of these &#8220;talking heads&#8221; aren&#8217;t talking about this game? If the Patriots, Saints, Jets, Steelers (we did when the Ravens hammered them) or Packers lost this bad we&#8217;d hear it for a month!! I understand no Manning, but he doesn&#8217;t play D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hireclixscott</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hireclixscott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peyton Manning is not the MVP.  Bill Polian deserves a lot of blame for not having a competent back up in place for Manning.  This comes down to executive management and coaching.  Both poor.  They road the Manning horse until it was dead without having anyone else in the stable.  Awful.  Plus, the Saints did run up the score, but the D has to stop them.  No whining.  These are paid professionals.  Anyone who whines about running up the score in the NFL should stick to HS football.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peyton Manning is not the MVP.  Bill Polian deserves a lot of blame for not having a competent back up in place for Manning.  This comes down to executive management and coaching.  Both poor.  They road the Manning horse until it was dead without having anyone else in the stable.  Awful.  Plus, the Saints did run up the score, but the D has to stop them.  No whining.  These are paid professionals.  Anyone who whines about running up the score in the NFL should stick to HS football.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canjura</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1345005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[canjura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1345005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dont understand why people are complaining about &quot;running up the score&quot;. These are both PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL TEAMS (Well, the only reason the Colts qualify is because they&#039;re getting paid to play), if you get your feelings hurt when a team scores tons of points, STOP THEM. I don&#039;t want to hear how the Saints are classless for scoring especially considering Brees didnt play the whole 4th quarter. I mean, what would happen if the Saints pulled Brees at half and the Colts came back (miracles do happen) and won.Then we&#039;d be complaining why didn&#039;t they keep the foot on the pedal and why this team is so soft.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont understand why people are complaining about &#8220;running up the score&#8221;. These are both PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL TEAMS (Well, the only reason the Colts qualify is because they&#8217;re getting paid to play), if you get your feelings hurt when a team scores tons of points, STOP THEM. I don&#8217;t want to hear how the Saints are classless for scoring especially considering Brees didnt play the whole 4th quarter. I mean, what would happen if the Saints pulled Brees at half and the Colts came back (miracles do happen) and won.Then we&#8217;d be complaining why didn&#8217;t they keep the foot on the pedal and why this team is so soft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tdrundmc</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tdrundmc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah way to run up the score on a  really bad football team..the saints and their qb captain check down are nothing special.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah way to run up the score on a  really bad football team..the saints and their qb captain check down are nothing special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmcdan13</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mmcdan13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[damnyoulinelliot says:Oct 24, 2011 12:01 AM 

Hey NBC, please work it out in 2012 somehow where flex scheduling starts earlier in the year. K? thnx


-------------------------------------------------------
Why, so we could have gotten the Titans-Texans game for first place in the AFC South, and another beatdown.  No guarantees, you can only hope for the best.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damnyoulinelliot says:Oct 24, 2011 12:01 AM </p>
<p>Hey NBC, please work it out in 2012 somehow where flex scheduling starts earlier in the year. K? thnx</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Why, so we could have gotten the Titans-Texans game for first place in the AFC South, and another beatdown.  No guarantees, you can only hope for the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacktumlinson</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344979</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jacktumlinson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[running up the score? So i guess they should have taken a knee on every possession in the second half. If they wanted to run up the score they would have score a 100. They was just playing their game. Not their fault the Colts can&#039;t stop a nosebleed. Get rid of that crappy cover 2. Teams know how to attack it. You need a good tight end and a good receiving running back to exploit the middle of the field and the Saints have that. Also you need good corners to cover the receivers and the Colts don&#039;t have those either. Scoring on just about every drive is what teams try to do. They didn&#039;t run trick plays, do onside kicks or nothing like that. They just lined up and ran plays. Get a clue. As far as no one in the NFC beating the Pats I think the Saints can and Green Bay can. Hell, if the Giants can I know the Saints and Green Bay Packers can. The Pats are not the same since they couldn&#039;t videotape the opposing teams anymore. Notice after they got caught doing that they haven&#039;t won a Super Bowl since.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>running up the score? So i guess they should have taken a knee on every possession in the second half. If they wanted to run up the score they would have score a 100. They was just playing their game. Not their fault the Colts can&#8217;t stop a nosebleed. Get rid of that crappy cover 2. Teams know how to attack it. You need a good tight end and a good receiving running back to exploit the middle of the field and the Saints have that. Also you need good corners to cover the receivers and the Colts don&#8217;t have those either. Scoring on just about every drive is what teams try to do. They didn&#8217;t run trick plays, do onside kicks or nothing like that. They just lined up and ran plays. Get a clue. As far as no one in the NFC beating the Pats I think the Saints can and Green Bay can. Hell, if the Giants can I know the Saints and Green Bay Packers can. The Pats are not the same since they couldn&#8217;t videotape the opposing teams anymore. Notice after they got caught doing that they haven&#8217;t won a Super Bowl since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r8erswilldebacleyou</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[r8erswilldebacleyou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manning is the greatest QB in NFL history. 

But, Dungy had already been running the Colts into the ground before Caldwell got his inept hands on them. Their schemes are horrible. They have about 8 different offensive plays. Painter, a &quot;professional QB&quot;, can&#039;t even call a play and their defense is predictable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manning is the greatest QB in NFL history. </p>
<p>But, Dungy had already been running the Colts into the ground before Caldwell got his inept hands on them. Their schemes are horrible. They have about 8 different offensive plays. Painter, a &#8220;professional QB&#8221;, can&#8217;t even call a play and their defense is predictable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrconnors</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrconnors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No whining about running up the score yet, we&#039;ll see what happens when the Patriots play the Colts this season.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No whining about running up the score yet, we&#8217;ll see what happens when the Patriots play the Colts this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ilovefoolsball</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ilovefoolsball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All this talk about the Saints running up the score sounds like a bunch of whiny, ugly girls complaining about the hot chick that wore a sexy dress.
Get off it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this talk about the Saints running up the score sounds like a bunch of whiny, ugly girls complaining about the hot chick that wore a sexy dress.<br />
Get off it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmwarner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmwarner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[diablito0402 says: Oct 24, 2011 12:57 AM

What a bunch of classless fools, i guess thats swamp football to run up the score like that,,
 
CaJonMcChicken says: Oct 24, 2011 1:04 AM

Was it just me or did it seem like the Saints were running the score up on the Colts? Why is there no backlash against them for it? Oooh because they are not the Patriots!
==================================

It&#039;s not their fault the Colts can&#039;t tackle or cover anybody.  Are they supposed to kneel on the ball in the third quarter?

BTW, &quot;classless&quot; is the most misused and overused word on PFT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>diablito0402 says: Oct 24, 2011 12:57 AM</p>
<p>What a bunch of classless fools, i guess thats swamp football to run up the score like that,,</p>
<p>CaJonMcChicken says: Oct 24, 2011 1:04 AM</p>
<p>Was it just me or did it seem like the Saints were running the score up on the Colts? Why is there no backlash against them for it? Oooh because they are not the Patriots!<br />
==================================</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not their fault the Colts can&#8217;t tackle or cover anybody.  Are they supposed to kneel on the ball in the third quarter?</p>
<p>BTW, &#8220;classless&#8221; is the most misused and overused word on PFT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kernelreefer</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/23/saints-drop-up-62-points-on-colts/#comment-1344941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kernelreefer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=162588#comment-1344941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Vikings fan, I can tell you right now:

No such thing as &quot;running up the score.&quot; When you have the lead, take it, and hold on to it, ANY WAY YOU CAN.

Sincerely,
disgruntled]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Vikings fan, I can tell you right now:</p>
<p>No such thing as &#8220;running up the score.&#8221; When you have the lead, take it, and hold on to it, ANY WAY YOU CAN.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
disgruntled</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
