<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PFT&#8217;s Week Eight picks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/</link>
	<description>ProFootballTalk on NBCSports.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 05:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: neeboy74</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1356286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neeboy74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1356286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey wait a minute!  Nobody mentioned that the Packers are gonna give up too many points this week!

Oh, wait a minute...we&#039;re on bye week.  Guess we&#039;re gonna hafta wait for next week for A-Rod to get his 5th Fed Ex Air player of the Week award!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wait a minute!  Nobody mentioned that the Packers are gonna give up too many points this week!</p>
<p>Oh, wait a minute&#8230;we&#8217;re on bye week.  Guess we&#8217;re gonna hafta wait for next week for A-Rod to get his 5th Fed Ex Air player of the Week award!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: electstat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1355365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[electstat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 23:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1355365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[bhindenemylines says: Oct 27, 2011 12:18 PM

notrelated says:
Oct 27, 2011 11:20 AM
Someone let Rosenthal know Andy Reid is 12-0 after the bye week.

———————————–
Somebody let notrelated know how the law of probability works.

The fact that he is 12-0 means there is a higher probability for a loss than a win.

_____________________

Fail. It means that there is a 50/50 chance of winning. You are probably the same person that will bet on red because there&#039;s no way black can hit five times in a row.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bhindenemylines says: Oct 27, 2011 12:18 PM</p>
<p>notrelated says:<br />
Oct 27, 2011 11:20 AM<br />
Someone let Rosenthal know Andy Reid is 12-0 after the bye week.</p>
<p>———————————–<br />
Somebody let notrelated know how the law of probability works.</p>
<p>The fact that he is 12-0 means there is a higher probability for a loss than a win.</p>
<p>_____________________</p>
<p>Fail. It means that there is a 50/50 chance of winning. You are probably the same person that will bet on red because there&#8217;s no way black can hit five times in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icyhuck</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1355250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icyhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1355250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marshall said the dolphins will win against the giants ,I won&#039;t hold my breath]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marshall said the dolphins will win against the giants ,I won&#8217;t hold my breath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icyhuck</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1355244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icyhuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1355244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah the ravens are going to run the score up on the CARDs this week to make wacko,flacco look good LOL hope so//ravens fan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah the ravens are going to run the score up on the CARDs this week to make wacko,flacco look good LOL hope so//ravens fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1354907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1354907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wish you&#039;d let me tell gimmeabruschi there was more to it than that ... because there was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wish you&#8217;d let me tell gimmeabruschi there was more to it than that &#8230; because there was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1354898</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1354898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@routerunner ...

Pats fans never cease to amaze me. They like to talk about &quot;most&quot; of our teams being roided up until it became against the rules but choose to ignore the fact that 1) only a couple of our offensive linemen said they took steroids and 2) &lt;em&gt;every&lt;/em&gt; team--including the Pats--was roided up until it became against the rules. It&#039;s called an even playing field.

I&#039;ve already got the part about the memo. People that don&#039;t get it aren&#039;t going to get it anymore than people are going to acknowledge that all teams were using steroids during that era. In the Pats&#039; case, there probably are misunderstandings because that whole thing was so convoluted. But people know the Steelers weren&#039;t the only team taking steroids. But just as you did in your post, they pretend otherwise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@routerunner &#8230;</p>
<p>Pats fans never cease to amaze me. They like to talk about &#8220;most&#8221; of our teams being roided up until it became against the rules but choose to ignore the fact that 1) only a couple of our offensive linemen said they took steroids and 2) <em>every</em> team&#8211;including the Pats&#8211;was roided up until it became against the rules. It&#8217;s called an even playing field.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already got the part about the memo. People that don&#8217;t get it aren&#8217;t going to get it anymore than people are going to acknowledge that all teams were using steroids during that era. In the Pats&#8217; case, there probably are misunderstandings because that whole thing was so convoluted. But people know the Steelers weren&#8217;t the only team taking steroids. But just as you did in your post, they pretend otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: routerunner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1354862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[routerunner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1354862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steeler fans never cease to amaze me.  They like to call the Pats cheaters even though most of their teams were roided up until it became against the rules.  But yet they choose to ignore the facts that 1) the Pats&#039; SBs preceded goodell&#039;s memo forbidding what they did and 2) Steeler hero Bill Cowher admitted to doing what the Pats did when he coached.

Hope this clears up any misunderstandings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steeler fans never cease to amaze me.  They like to call the Pats cheaters even though most of their teams were roided up until it became against the rules.  But yet they choose to ignore the facts that 1) the Pats&#8217; SBs preceded goodell&#8217;s memo forbidding what they did and 2) Steeler hero Bill Cowher admitted to doing what the Pats did when he coached.</p>
<p>Hope this clears up any misunderstandings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: souldogdave</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1354083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[souldogdave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1354083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Romo is the Jennifer Aniston of the NFL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Romo is the Jennifer Aniston of the NFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delius1967</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[delius1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are only three teams in the league capable of beating Dallas:  the Packers, the Patriots, and the Cowboys.

Unfortunately that last opponent is going to keep showing up wherever they play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only three teams in the league capable of beating Dallas:  the Packers, the Patriots, and the Cowboys.</p>
<p>Unfortunately that last opponent is going to keep showing up wherever they play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimmeabruschi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gimmeabruschi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 04:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Deb

They nix a few of my posts here and there. I just move on. Trying to divine the rhyme or reason behind it will only destroy your mind. Keep sharing your insights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deb</p>
<p>They nix a few of my posts here and there. I just move on. Trying to divine the rhyme or reason behind it will only destroy your mind. Keep sharing your insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howley1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howley1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Steelers Super Bowl roid wins preceded the 1980 ban and the Pats’ Super Bowl camera wins preceded Goodell’s memo. There is no question of legitimacy in either case.

-------------------------------------------------------

Actually Goodell&#039;s memo was not an establishment of a new rule but a reminder of an existing rule that had been around for years. I believe it was directed at at least one team that shall remain nameless... and that team ignored the reminder just like they had been ignoring the existing rule, which forced action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Steelers Super Bowl roid wins preceded the 1980 ban and the Pats’ Super Bowl camera wins preceded Goodell’s memo. There is no question of legitimacy in either case.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Actually Goodell&#8217;s memo was not an establishment of a new rule but a reminder of an existing rule that had been around for years. I believe it was directed at at least one team that shall remain nameless&#8230; and that team ignored the reminder just like they had been ignoring the existing rule, which forced action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@the adult professional moderator with the sense of humor who approved my last post ... 

God bless you, too!!!!! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@the adult professional moderator with the sense of humor who approved my last post &#8230; </p>
<p>God bless you, too!!!!! <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satan's Valet</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satan's Valet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[0 degrees Kelvin says: Oct 27, 2011 6:03 PM

@theroc5156says:

No cheating?? Are you kidding me?? The Steelers were one of the most ‘roided up teams in the ’70′s.

___________________________________
Steroids WERE NOT banned in the NFL until 1983.
So moron, how is that cheating in the ’70′s? Idiot.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The same way that a lot of people consider HGH to be cheating right now, even if it isn&#039;t illegal (yet).  I don&#039;t need the rules to catch up with what I know is wrong to not consider it cheating, because I&#039;m not going to hide behind a technicality.  Does the spirit of fair competition mean nothing to you?  If not I guess you never competed in anything athletically.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0 degrees Kelvin says: Oct 27, 2011 6:03 PM</p>
<p>@theroc5156says:</p>
<p>No cheating?? Are you kidding me?? The Steelers were one of the most ‘roided up teams in the ’70′s.</p>
<p>___________________________________<br />
Steroids WERE NOT banned in the NFL until 1983.<br />
So moron, how is that cheating in the ’70′s? Idiot.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
The same way that a lot of people consider HGH to be cheating right now, even if it isn&#8217;t illegal (yet).  I don&#8217;t need the rules to catch up with what I know is wrong to not consider it cheating, because I&#8217;m not going to hide behind a technicality.  Does the spirit of fair competition mean nothing to you?  If not I guess you never competed in anything athletically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@gimmeabruschi ...

Well, I have what fun I&#039;m allowed, but for months the Gestapo have censored any attempt on my part to joke, demonstrate football knowledge, or comment on my own team unless I resubmit 20 times, complain incessantly to NBC, or manage to sneak in something when a respectful, professional adult moderator is on duty. So I imagine taking verbal swipes at people&#039;s testes would be verbotten for me. But I&#039;ll try my best ;) God bless the U.S.A.!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@gimmeabruschi &#8230;</p>
<p>Well, I have what fun I&#8217;m allowed, but for months the Gestapo have censored any attempt on my part to joke, demonstrate football knowledge, or comment on my own team unless I resubmit 20 times, complain incessantly to NBC, or manage to sneak in something when a respectful, professional adult moderator is on duty. So I imagine taking verbal swipes at people&#8217;s testes would be verbotten for me. But I&#8217;ll try my best <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  God bless the U.S.A.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docboss</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[docboss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there anyone on the planet who really thinks the Rams will score more than 10 points against the Saints? Memo from Stan to Steve. &quot;Tick, tick, tick.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anyone on the planet who really thinks the Rams will score more than 10 points against the Saints? Memo from Stan to Steve. &#8220;Tick, tick, tick.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howley1</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howley1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@xtb3: They switched from the wide 9 to the more traditional 6 stance (on running downs) against a running team a held them to 42 rushing yards last week .

-----------------------------------------------------------

&quot;against a running team&quot; &lt;---- hahaha

Just say it. It was the Redskins. They had no QB whatsoever, a bunch of 2&#039;s and 3&#039;s starting at WR, a crippled TE trying to play FB, and their top running back (Hightower) didn&#039;t play. It is what it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@xtb3: They switched from the wide 9 to the more traditional 6 stance (on running downs) against a running team a held them to 42 rushing yards last week .</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;against a running team&#8221; &lt;&#8212;- hahaha</p>
<p>Just say it. It was the Redskins. They had no QB whatsoever, a bunch of 2&#039;s and 3&#039;s starting at WR, a crippled TE trying to play FB, and their top running back (Hightower) didn&#039;t play. It is what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gimmeabruschi</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gimmeabruschi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deb says: Oct 27, 2011 1:34 PM

@gimmeabruschi …

Read up on your NFL history before you start that Steelers-’n-Steroids bit again? It’s been well established that steroids were in common use by every team from the late 1960s until they were banned by the NFL in the late 1980s. And since they were used by players on every team, it was an even playing field.

Yeah, doofus asked for it with his “6 rings, no cheating” remark. But since I always post that the Pats didn’t get their championships from a video camera, it wouldn’t hurt you guys to take the high road, too.

_________________________________


He asked for it. He got it. I temporarily came down from the high road to deliver the nut shot he was begging for. It was an act of random kindness.

The Steelers Super Bowl roid wins preceded the 1980 ban and the Pats&#039; Super Bowl camera wins preceded Goodell&#039;s memo. There is no question of legitimacy in either case.

I encourage you as well to exit the high road and to admonish with a hefty kick to the testes any unprovoked Pats&#039; fan who would be so foolish as to attempt to besmirch the Steeler victories by bringing up roids.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deb says: Oct 27, 2011 1:34 PM</p>
<p>@gimmeabruschi …</p>
<p>Read up on your NFL history before you start that Steelers-’n-Steroids bit again? It’s been well established that steroids were in common use by every team from the late 1960s until they were banned by the NFL in the late 1980s. And since they were used by players on every team, it was an even playing field.</p>
<p>Yeah, doofus asked for it with his “6 rings, no cheating” remark. But since I always post that the Pats didn’t get their championships from a video camera, it wouldn’t hurt you guys to take the high road, too.</p>
<p>_________________________________</p>
<p>He asked for it. He got it. I temporarily came down from the high road to deliver the nut shot he was begging for. It was an act of random kindness.</p>
<p>The Steelers Super Bowl roid wins preceded the 1980 ban and the Pats&#8217; Super Bowl camera wins preceded Goodell&#8217;s memo. There is no question of legitimacy in either case.</p>
<p>I encourage you as well to exit the high road and to admonish with a hefty kick to the testes any unprovoked Pats&#8217; fan who would be so foolish as to attempt to besmirch the Steeler victories by bringing up roids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oside760</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oside760]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanna just go ahead and say this again, even though I&#039;ve said it about a gazillion times already.. I don&#039;t believe there is another charger fan out there in the entire universe that wants norv turner and aj smith fired more than I do.  I haven&#039;t agreed with the hiring since day 1, and I haven&#039;t agreed with any of the other coaches he has brought in.  I can&#039;t wait to see the game this Monday.  If they lose... I want norvs head]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanna just go ahead and say this again, even though I&#8217;ve said it about a gazillion times already.. I don&#8217;t believe there is another charger fan out there in the entire universe that wants norv turner and aj smith fired more than I do.  I haven&#8217;t agreed with the hiring since day 1, and I haven&#8217;t agreed with any of the other coaches he has brought in.  I can&#8217;t wait to see the game this Monday.  If they lose&#8230; I want norvs head</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacksaysfu</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jacksaysfu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@dcowboysfan : &quot;your team (eagles) is a joke &quot;..........The Eagles are 1 game behind Dallas and are gonna stomp Romo Sunday night .

@xtb3: They switched from the wide 9 to the more traditional 6 stance (on running downs) against a running team a held them to 42 rushing yards last week . It&#039;s early but know your facts . 
Philly will still win the East , and after Sunday will be in 2nd place....Times ours , haters !!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@dcowboysfan : &#8220;your team (eagles) is a joke &#8220;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.The Eagles are 1 game behind Dallas and are gonna stomp Romo Sunday night .</p>
<p>@xtb3: They switched from the wide 9 to the more traditional 6 stance (on running downs) against a running team a held them to 42 rushing yards last week . It&#8217;s early but know your facts .<br />
Philly will still win the East , and after Sunday will be in 2nd place&#8230;.Times ours , haters !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0 degrees Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[0 degrees Kelvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;@theroc5156&lt;/b&gt;says:

No cheating?? Are you kidding me?? The Steelers were one of the most ‘roided up teams in the ’70′s.

___________________________________
Steroids &lt;b&gt;WERE NOT&lt;/b&gt; banned in the NFL until 1983.
So moron, how is that cheating in the &#039;70&#039;s? Idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@theroc5156</b>says:</p>
<p>No cheating?? Are you kidding me?? The Steelers were one of the most ‘roided up teams in the ’70′s.</p>
<p>___________________________________<br />
Steroids <b>WERE NOT</b> banned in the NFL until 1983.<br />
So moron, how is that cheating in the &#8217;70&#8242;s? Idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rodgerthat</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodgerthat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The Broncos passing attack had two yards halfway through the fourth quarter last week&quot;
--------------------------------------------
I am having a real hard time understanding the media hype behind this Tebow guy. They talk about him on ESPN, NFL Net, JRIB, heck even TMZ! Just a question for the peeps that watch the games which is you guys on here.... Am I missing something? This dude throws the worst football I have ever seen tossed by an individual older than 5. Every ball I saw him throw last week was a wobbly, bobbly, joke. Even &quot;THE&quot; couple he completed at the end of the game were a freakin joke.... So I ask what is the attraction???????
* Oh and prediction hmmmmm I predict that the Packers don&#039;t win this week. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Broncos passing attack had two yards halfway through the fourth quarter last week&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
I am having a real hard time understanding the media hype behind this Tebow guy. They talk about him on ESPN, NFL Net, JRIB, heck even TMZ! Just a question for the peeps that watch the games which is you guys on here&#8230;. Am I missing something? This dude throws the worst football I have ever seen tossed by an individual older than 5. Every ball I saw him throw last week was a wobbly, bobbly, joke. Even &#8220;THE&#8221; couple he completed at the end of the game were a freakin joke&#8230;. So I ask what is the attraction???????<br />
* Oh and prediction hmmmmm I predict that the Packers don&#8217;t win this week. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whyalwaysthehate</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whyalwaysthehate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I now hate both of you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now hate both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strunkian</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strunkian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rosenthal will be up by 50 by the time anyone locks up a playoff spot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosenthal will be up by 50 by the time anyone locks up a playoff spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PanchoHerreraFanClub</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PanchoHerreraFanClub]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG, both of you are picking the Rams to score 2 TDs in a single game. What are you smoking? I predict that Rams will score exactly 2 TDs in the next 3 games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, both of you are picking the Rams to score 2 TDs in a single game. What are you smoking? I predict that Rams will score exactly 2 TDs in the next 3 games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmwarner</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fmwarner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dhc1980 says: Oct 27, 2011 11:37 AM

Tom Brady, by no means owns the Steelers. He does not have 6 superbowl rings…The Rooney’s do though, and about to be 7!!
===================================

And how many of those rings came at Brady&#039;s expense? 

Yeah, thought so.

Steelers fans here have accomplished the impossible.  They make Pats fans look sympathetic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dhc1980 says: Oct 27, 2011 11:37 AM</p>
<p>Tom Brady, by no means owns the Steelers. He does not have 6 superbowl rings…The Rooney’s do though, and about to be 7!!<br />
===================================</p>
<p>And how many of those rings came at Brady&#8217;s expense? </p>
<p>Yeah, thought so.</p>
<p>Steelers fans here have accomplished the impossible.  They make Pats fans look sympathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blu4l1fe</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blu4l1fe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it is getting tiring hearing about how the Redskins had regressed but I also agree that they probably weren&#039;t that good to begin with but was just able to make enough plays and even maybe outplay their opponents when they won those early games.  But I think more people are now voicing their opinions with regards to their piling losses because quite a few considered them as &quot;the team to beat&quot; or &quot;Super Bowl bound&quot; when they won a few games even though it was early in the season.  Again, this is most likely the only league where team standing and positions change within a week or two time period.  I guess I can understand why the Skins fans got overexcited when they started the season with multiple wins considering they really have not had much success in prior seasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is getting tiring hearing about how the Redskins had regressed but I also agree that they probably weren&#8217;t that good to begin with but was just able to make enough plays and even maybe outplay their opponents when they won those early games.  But I think more people are now voicing their opinions with regards to their piling losses because quite a few considered them as &#8220;the team to beat&#8221; or &#8220;Super Bowl bound&#8221; when they won a few games even though it was early in the season.  Again, this is most likely the only league where team standing and positions change within a week or two time period.  I guess I can understand why the Skins fans got overexcited when they started the season with multiple wins considering they really have not had much success in prior seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozosforall</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bozosforall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wikidpissah says: 
Oct 27, 2011 2:34 PM 
dhc1980 says: 

Patriots D is way overrated and older than the Steelers. Prediction: Steelers 31 Pats 16

___________________________________
Over rated? Everyone except you seems to know that the Pats’ defense is their Achilles heal. 

As for the age of the Pats’ defense, you’re 0 for 2. Other than a couple veterans on the D-Line, they have one of the youngest defenses in the NFL.

It’s better to remain silent and thought a fool….

__
Yet you failed to follow your own advice and spoke up anyway.  Par for the course for idiot Pats fans like yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wikidpissah says:<br />
Oct 27, 2011 2:34 PM<br />
dhc1980 says: </p>
<p>Patriots D is way overrated and older than the Steelers. Prediction: Steelers 31 Pats 16</p>
<p>___________________________________<br />
Over rated? Everyone except you seems to know that the Pats’ defense is their Achilles heal. </p>
<p>As for the age of the Pats’ defense, you’re 0 for 2. Other than a couple veterans on the D-Line, they have one of the youngest defenses in the NFL.</p>
<p>It’s better to remain silent and thought a fool….</p>
<p>__<br />
Yet you failed to follow your own advice and spoke up anyway.  Par for the course for idiot Pats fans like yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: test2402</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1353060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[test2402]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1353060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Romo is over paid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Romo is over paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: childressrulz</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1352989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[childressrulz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1352989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate the Broncos but the Lions are far worse than people thought. I guess the clock struck 12 and they are back to being a pumpkin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the Broncos but the Lions are far worse than people thought. I guess the clock struck 12 and they are back to being a pumpkin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/27/pfts-week-eight-picks/#comment-1352987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=163331#comment-1352987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Lee &gt; Tom Brady]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Lee &gt; Tom Brady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
