Skip to content

Baseball beats football to the punch on HGH testing

Getty Images

For those of you who don’t pay attention to other sports, you may not have heard that baseball has avoided the drama (and free publicity) that comes from a protracted labor squabble.  Instead, management and labor recently worked out a new agreement, without rancor, rhetoric, or rigmaroles.

According to ESPN, the new labor deal for baseball includes an agreement that players’ blood will be tested for HGH.

Of course, the NFL’s new labor deal includes such a provision as well, but the two sides left enough wiggle room in the chapters-and-verses to allow the NFLPA to drag its feet, and the NFL has yet to muster the nerve to try to enforce the commitment via a court of law or some similar authority.

At a time when Congress has no timetable for continuing to prod the stewards of pro football toward ensuring that something other than the honor system is used to keep the sport completely clean, the decision of baseball players to accept blood testing for HGH will serve only to put more pressure on football players to do the same.

And it would be wise, both for the NFL and the union, to find a way to make that happen without Congress having to start questioning players under oath and otherwise dredging up evidence of who knew what and when they knew it about the use of HGH in pro football.

Permalink 16 Comments Feed for comments Latest Stories in: Rumor Mill, Top Stories
16 Responses to “Baseball beats football to the punch on HGH testing”
  1. alldayaldon says: Nov 20, 2011 8:54 AM

    albert and reyes better sign somewhere soon.

  2. howiefeltersnatch says: Nov 20, 2011 8:54 AM

    Sounds to me like football is just dragging their feet waiting for their players to make sure to get the HGH out of their system before they start testing them for it.

  3. bloggingpoodlewalker says: Nov 20, 2011 8:55 AM

    We dont want HGH testing in the NFL,..heck we dont want steroid testing either,…football is better with both. I just set you all strait.

  4. canetic says: Nov 20, 2011 8:56 AM

    So I guess Albert Pujols will be switching over the NFL now.

  5. jetsmetsfan says: Nov 20, 2011 9:02 AM

    I guess MLB wants to get rid of the drugs and the NFL doesn’t…pretty simple

  6. seneca1ss says: Nov 20, 2011 9:10 AM

    since baseball cracked down on steroid testing, the players don’t charge the mound like raving lunatics anymore

  7. Patriot42 says: Nov 20, 2011 9:23 AM

    The players union like alot of unions are protecting themselves with smoke and mirrors. Half of these clowns on on the stuff and don’t want to be caught.

  8. greymares says: Nov 20, 2011 9:24 AM

    baseball may be first but football will be most.

  9. greymares says: Nov 20, 2011 9:27 AM

    by the way how’s tiger woods doing since his doctor has been exposed.

  10. thridandlong says: Nov 20, 2011 9:34 AM

    This is all about money.

    First there will be heavy $ fines to those that test positive. Another revenue source for MLB.
    Probably then a reinstatement fee as well.

    The rich getting richer.

  11. dionoil says: Nov 20, 2011 9:40 AM

    I’ll just say it. Legalities aside, football is better with hgh

  12. joetoronto says: Nov 20, 2011 10:46 AM

    Baseball beating the NFL to HGH testing is an embarrassment to the NFL

    Baseball, wow.

  13. yahmule says: Nov 20, 2011 10:58 AM

    Too bad they didn’t do this before the owners sanctioned the players to wipe their asses with the record books. There are precious few baseball men left among the baseball owners and Bud Selig is worse at his job than anybody I’ve ever seen. That said, I’m glad to see them take positive steps to clean up the sport. I hated 10-9 slugfests every day and half a dozen shortstops hitting over 30 HR a year.

    The NFL institutes all changes grudgingly and at their own pace. It is certainly no exaggeration to say the owners have little regard for the ultimate health and well being of their players. The mentality of the game is such that players are put in position to essentially share that view themselves. You can see this in the resistance to crackdowns on violent hits. Playing football is bad for you and the proliferation of drugs that make players bigger, faster, stronger and more aggressive isn’t necessary for an entertaining sport. The fact that their are long term health issues related to unregulated used of PEDS is reason enough to ban them from the sport.

  14. melikefootball says: Nov 20, 2011 11:10 AM

    More and more the dragging of the feet by NFL players, is sounding like they all know more than they want anyone to find out.

  15. section24 says: Nov 20, 2011 12:38 PM

    “For those of you who don’t pay attention to other sports…”

    There is the impression that this site is populated by young kids, not sports fans.

  16. philyeagles5 says: Nov 20, 2011 1:13 PM

    and football wins in everything else

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!